GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT REGIONAL PARKS COMMITTEE

Transcription

1 GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT REGIONAL PARKS COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, March 31, :00 PM 2 nd Floor Boardroom, 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia A G E N D A 1 1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 1.1 March 31, 2015 Regular Meeting Agenda That the Regional Parks Committee adopt the agenda for its regular meeting scheduled for March 31, 2015, as circulated. 2. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES 2.1 February 19, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes That the Regional Parks Committee adopt the minutes of its regular meeting held February 19, 2015, as circulated. 3. DELEGATIONS 4. INVITED PRESENTATIONS 5. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEE OR STAFF 5.1 Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, 2015 Designated Speaker: Gudrun Jensen, Division Manager Parks Visitor and Operations Services, Policy, Planning and Environment Department That the GVRD Board: a) give first, second and third reading to Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, 2015 ; and b) pass and finally adopt Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, Note: Recommendation is shown under each item, where applicable. March 24, 2015 Regional Parks Committee 1

2 Regional Parks Regular Agenda March 31, 2015 Agenda Page 2 of Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Designated Speaker: Gudrun Jensen, Division Manager Parks Visitor and Operations Services, Policy, Planning and Environment Department That the GVRD Board: a) give first, second and third reading to Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 ; and b) pass and finally adopt Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, 2015 Designated Speaker: Gudrun Jensen, Division Manager Parks Visitor and Operations Services, Policy, Planning and Environment Department That the GVRD Board: a) give first, second and third reading to Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, 2015 ; and b) pass and finally adopt Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, Colony Farm Regional Park Sheep Paddocks Pedestrian Only Trail Feasibility Options Designated Speaker: Jamie Valla, Park Planner, Planning, Policy and Environment Department That the Regional Parks Committee: a) receive for information the report dated March 4, 2015, titled Colony Farm Regional Park Sheep Paddocks Pedestrian Only Trail Feasibility Options ; and b) direct staff to halt feasibility testing of the Sheep Paddocks pedestrian only trail option at this time and report back at a future date on the need for additional park trails once the multi use trail has been constructed and has had a full year of operation. 5.5 Crippen Regional Park Pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden Proposal Designated Speaker: Gregory Paris, West Area Planner, Regional Parks Division, Planning, Policy and Environment Department That the Regional Parks Committee: a) direct staff, in response to public feedback, to advise the Bowen Agricultural Alliance to find a more supportable location for its Pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden Proposal; and b) thank the Bowen Agricultural Alliance for its volunteer work on the initiative. Regional Parks Committee 2

3 Regional Parks Regular Agenda March 31, 2015 Agenda Page 3 of Manager s Report Regional Parks Designated Speaker: Allan Neilson, General Manager, Planning, Policy and Environment Department That the Regional Parks Committee receive for information the report dated March 2, 2015, titled Manager s Report Regional Parks. 6 INFORMATION ITEMS 6.1 Regional Parks Summary of April 2015 Events 7 OTHER BUSINESS 8 BUSINESS ARISING FROM DELEGATIONS 9 RESOLUTION TO CLOSE MEETING Note: The Committee must state by resolution the basis under section 90 of the Community Charter on which the meeting is being closed. If a member wishes to add an item, the basis must be included below. That the Regional Parks Committee close its regular meeting schedule for March 31, 2015, pursuant to the Community Charter provisions, Section 90 (1) <(i )> as follows: 90 (1) A part of the meeting may be closed to the public if the subject matter being considered relates to or is one or more of the following: (i) the receipt of advice that is subject to solicitor client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose 10 ADJOURNMENT/CONCLUSION That the Regional Parks Committee adjourn/conclude its regular meeting of March 31, Membership: Deal, Heather (C) Vancouver Long, Bob (VC) Langley Township Braun, Henry Abbotsford Dhaliwal, Sav Burnaby Elkerton, Janis Pitt Meadows Hayne, Bruce Surrey Hodge, Craig Coquitlam Jackson, Lois Delta McEwen, John Anmore Muri, Lisa North Vancouver District Nicholson, Maureen Bowen Island Penner, Darrell Port Coquitlam Read, Nicole Maple Ridge Regional Parks Committee 3

4 2.1 GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT REGIONAL PARKS COMMITTEE Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) Regional Parks Committee held at 9:00 a.m. on Thursday, February 19, 2015 in the 2 nd Floor Boardroom, 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Councillor Heather Deal, Vancouver Vice Chair, Councillor Bob Long, Langley Township Mayor Henry Braun, Abbotsford Councillor Janis Elkerton, Pitt Meadows Councillor Craig Hodge, Coquitlam Mayor Lois Jackson, Delta Mayor John McEwen, Anmore Councillor Lisa Muri, North Vancouver District Councillor Maureen Nicholson, Bowen Island Mayor Nicole Read, Maple Ridge MEMBERS ABSENT: Councillor Sav Dhaliwal, Burnaby Councillor Bruce Hayne, Surrey Councillor Darrell Penner, Port Coquitlam STAFF PRESENT: Allan Neilson, General Manager, Planning, Policy and Environment Carol Mason, Commissioner/Chief Administrative Officer Janis Knaupp, Assistant to Regional Committees, Board and Information Services, Legal and Legislative Services 1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 1.1 February 19, 2015 Regular Meeting Agenda It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Regional Parks Committee adopt the agenda for its regular meeting scheduled for Thursday, February 19, 2015, as circulated. CARRIED Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the GVRD Regional Parks Committee held on Thursday, February 19, 2015 Page 1 of 5 Regional Parks Committee 4

5 2. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES 2.1 January 29, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes 3. DELEGATIONS No items presented. It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Regional Parks Committee adopt the minutes of its regular meeting held Thursday, January 29, 2015, as circulated. CARRIED 4. INVITED PRESENTATIONS No items presented. 5. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEE OR STAFF 5.1 Campbell Valley and Aldergrove Regional Parks National Hiking Trail Designation Report dated January 21, 2015 from Wendy DaDalt, East Area Manager, Regional Parks, Planning, Policy and Environment, seeking GVRD Board approval to have sections of existing trails in Campbell Valley and Aldergrove Regional Parks designated as part of the National Hiking Trail. It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVRD Board approve the designation of select trails in Metro Vancouver s Campbell Valley and Aldergrove Regional Parks as part of the National Hiking Trail, as requested by Hike BC, as presented in the report dated January 21, 2015, titled Campbell Valley and Aldergrove Regional Parks National Hiking Trail Designation. CARRIED Regional Parks Service Review Overview and Progress Report Report dated January 23, 2015 from Frieda Schade, Division Manager, Regional Parks Planning and Engineering Services, Planning, Policy and Environment, providing the Regional Parks Committee with an overview and progress report on actions required to implement the 2014 Regional Parks Service Review. Members were provided an overview presentation and progress report on the 2014 Regional Parks Service Review highlighting recommendations, implementation, and how service review products fit with plans and guiding documents. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the GVRD Regional Parks Committee held on Thursday, February 19, 2015 Page 2 of 5 Regional Parks Committee 5

6 Discussion ensued about consideration of agricultural activities in regional parks as well as municipal and regional park maps. Request of Staff Staff was requested to distribute to the Regional Parks Committee the 2014 report presented to the Environment and Parks Committee on the role of agriculture in Metro Vancouver parks, for information. Request of Staff Staff was requested to post to the Metro Vancouver website the municipalregional parks overlap map and provide a link to the Regional Parks Committee when available. Presentation material titled Regional Parks Service Review Overview and Progress Report is retained with the February 19, 2015 Regional Parks Committee agenda. It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Regional Parks Committee receive for information the report dated January 23, 2015, titled 2014 Regional Parks Service Review Overview and Progress Report. CARRIED 5.3 Manager s Report Regional Parks Report dated January 26, 2015 from Allan Neilson, General Manager, Planning, Policy and Environment, updating the Regional Planning Committee on the Committee s 2015 Work Plan, iparks Navigator, Regional Trail Network Map, and the George Ross bequest announcement and recognition event. Members were introduced to Joe Hargitt, Executive Director, Pacific Parklands Foundation; efforts by Caitlin Hill, outgoing Acting Executive Director and former Communications and Fund Development Coordinator, were recognized. Members were provided a live demonstration of the Metro Vancouver iparks Navigator app highlighting collaborative data collection efforts with member municipalities, municipal interest in participating, downloading, navigating, features, map legend, wireless access in regional parks, and user feedback. Members were further provided a presentation on developing a Regional Trail Network Map, including opportunities and challenges. Members were requested to provide feedback on scope, purpose, audience and cycling as a component. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the GVRD Regional Parks Committee held on Thursday, February 19, 2015 Page 3 of 5 Regional Parks Committee 6

7 It was suggested that consideration be given to exploring opportunities using the Metro Vancouver iparks Navigator app and clarifying local and regional responsibilities. Request of Staff Staff was requested to the Regional Parks Committee the questions posed in the February 19, 2015 Developing a Regional Trail Network Map presentation, seeking feedback from the Committee by March 5, 2015, and report back to the Committee. Presentation material titled What is the purpose of today s Regional Network Map Presentation is retained with the February 19, 2015 Regional Parks Committee agenda. 6. INFORMATION ITEMS It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Regional Parks Committee receive for information the report dated January 26, 2015, titled Manager s Report Regional Parks. CARRIED It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Regional Parks Committee receive for information the following Information Items: 6.1 Summary of Regional Parks Events for March 2015; and 6.2 Hunting Along Boundary Bay Correspondence dated January 16, 2015, from the Corporation of Delta s Mayor, Lois E. Jackson, addressed to the Metro Vancouver Regional Parks Committee. CARRIED 7. OTHER BUSINESS No items presented. 8. BUSINESS ARISING FROM DELEGATIONS No items presented. 9. RESOLUTION TO CLOSE MEETING It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Regional Parks Committee close its regular meeting scheduled for February 19, 2015, pursuant to the Community Charter provisions, Section 90(1)(e), (i) and (k) as follows: 90 (1) A part of the meeting may be closed to the public if the subject matter being considered relates to or is one or more of the following: Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the GVRD Regional Parks Committee held on Thursday, February 19, 2015 Page 4 of 5 Regional Parks Committee 7

8 (e) (i) (k) the acquisition, disposition or expropriation of land or improvements, if the board or committee considers that disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the regional district; and the receipt of advice that is subject to solicitor client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose; negotiations and related discussions respecting the proposed provision of a regional district service that are at their preliminary stages and that, in the view of the board or committee, could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the regional district if they were held in public. CARRIED 10. ADJOURNMENT/CONCLUSION It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Regional Parks Committee adjourn its regular meeting of February 19, CARRIED (Time: 10:11 a.m.) Janis Knaupp, Assistant to Regional Committees Heather Deal, Chair FINAL Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the GVRD Regional Parks Committee held on Thursday, February 19, 2015 Page 5 of 5 Regional Parks Committee 8

9 5.1 To: From: Regional Parks Committee Gudrun Jensen, Division Manager Parks Visitor and Operations Services, Policy, Planning and Environment Department Date: February 23, 2015 Meeting Date: March 31, 2015 Subject: Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, 2015 RECOMMENDATION That the GVRD Board: a) give first, second and third reading to Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, 2015 ; and b) pass and finally adopt Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, PURPOSE To authorize amendments to Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw No. 1177, BACKGROUND The Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw allows Metro Vancouver to manage the use of regional parks by the public. The bylaw sets out prohibitions and a system of permits that, taken together, are designed to regulate park visitor behaviour and activities. From time to time, update and housekeeping amendments are required to the Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw in order to keep the bylaw current. Proposed regional park fees and charges are listed in Schedule A. These fees and charges are adjusted periodically to reflect current rates in municipal park systems across Metro Vancouver. Regional Parks approach is to adjust fees as required to remain in the mid range of comparable fee schedules, and to avoid significant market adjustments. Proposed amendments to the Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw include: a) Adding a prohibition against leaving non regional park property in a regional park; b) Requiring dog feces to be disposed of in a receptacle if provided; and c) Effective 2016, increasing fees by 2 3% to I. Liquor Permits II. Commercial Use Bus Parking Fees III. Rentals of Fields, Group Campsites and Indoor Facilities. Regional Parks Committee 9

10 Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, 2015 Regional Parks Committee Meeting: March 31, 2015 Page 2 of 2 ALTERNATIVES 1. That the GVRD Board: a) give first, second and third reading to Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, 2015 ; and b) pass and finally adopt Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, That the GVRD Board provide alternate direction to staff. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The proposed fees and charges increases will generate an additional $3,000, based on the 2014 level of rentals and permits. SUMMARY / CONCLUSION Staff recommend Alternative 1. This amending bylaw outlines minor increases to select Regional Parks rental and permit fees and charges, and includes certain housekeeping updates. Attachment: (DOC# ) Greater Vancouver Regional District Bylaw No. 1218, Regional Parks Committee 10

11 5.1 Attachment GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO. 1218, 2015 A Bylaw to Amend Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw No. 1177, 2012 WHEREAS the Board of Directors of the Greater Vancouver Regional District has adopted Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw No. 1177, 2012, a bylaw to establish rules and regulations for the management, maintenance, operation, enforcement, control, and use of regional parks and property in regional parks; and WHEREAS the Board of Directors of the Greater Vancouver Regional District wishes to amend Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw No. 1177, 2012 ; NOW THEREFORE the Board of Directors of the Greater Vancouver Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw No. 1177, 2012 is hereby amended as follows: (a) Section 3.4(g) is added as follows: 3.4(g) No person shall leave or abandon any non regional park property in a regional park. (b) Section 8.6 is deleted and replaced by the following: 8.6 An owner of a dog shall immediately remove and dispose of any defecated matter of the dog in a designated waste receptacle or in an otherwise sanitary manner. (c) Effective 01 January 2016 Schedule A is deleted and replaced by the attached Schedule A. Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, 2015 Page 1 of 7 Regional Parks Committee 11

12 2. This bylaw shall be cited as Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME this day of, PASSED AND FINALLY ADOPTED this day of, Greg Moore, Chair Chris Plagnol, Corporate Officer Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, 2015 Page 2 of 7 Regional Parks Committee 12

13 SCHEDULE A (Effective 01 January 2016) Section 1.0 GENERAL FEES 1.1 Tent Rental Fees Tent size Fee, per day 6.09m x 6.09m (20' x 20') $ m x 9.14m (20' x 30') $ Liquor Permits NO. of Persons Fee, per day 1 to 199 persons $ persons $ persons $ or more persons $ Parking Permits Regional Park Location Fee, per hour Fee, per day Pacific Spirit Fraser Lot $1.50 $7.50 Section 2.0 COMMERCIAL USE PARK PERMIT FEES 2.1 Commercial Use Permit Initial Application and Annual Fees Fee Initial commercial use permit application fee $105 Annual commercial use permit fee for general commercial activities $105 Annual commercial use permit fee for bicycle tours $207 Annual commercial use permit fee for guided equestrian rides $207 Commercial use permit fee for dog walking, up to 4 dogs $450 Commercial use permit fee for dog walking, more than 4 dogs $750 Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, 2015 Page 3 of 7 Regional Parks Committee 13

14 Section 2.0 COMMERCIAL USE PARK PERMIT FEES (Continued) 2.2 Commercial Use Permit Specialized Fees Fees Locker storage of commercial use related equipment at Wreck Beach, where the maximum rental period permitted is April 1 to September 30 of each year Replacement key for locker storage at Wreck Beach Commercial use permittee vest Park permit for buses and other motor vehicles that enter a regional park in connection with a commercial use $100 per bin per rental period (nonrefundable) $15 per replacement $35 per vest 11 or fewer seats: $16 per vehicle per day or $612 annually per vehicle 12 to 24 seats: $26 per vehicle per day or $867 annually per vehicle 25 seats or more: $44 per vehicle per day or $1,275 annually per vehicle Section 3.0 REGIONAL PARK FACILITY PARK PERMIT FEES 3.1 Outdoor Facilities Regional Park Facility Fee on weekends and holidays, per day Fee on weekdays, per day Picnic Shelters Aldergrove Blacktail Picnic Shelter $140 $67 Belcarra Belcarra 1 Picnic Shelter $140 $67 Belcarra Belcarra 2 Picnic Shelter $140 $67 Boundary Bay Boundary Bay 1 Picnic Shelter $140 $67 Boundary Bay Boundary Bay 2 Picnic Shelter $140 $67 Campbell Valley Old Orchard Picnic Shelter $140 $67 Crippen Crippen 1 Picnic Shelter $67 $67 Crippen Crippen 2 Picnic Shelter $67 $67 Crippen Crippen 3 Picnic Shelter $67 $67 Deas Island Deas Picnic Shelter $140 $67 Deas Island Muskrat Meadows Picnic Shelter $140 $67 Derby Reach Marpole Picnic Shelter $140 $67 Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, 2015 Page 4 of 7 Regional Parks Committee 14

15 Section 3.0 REGIONAL PARK FACILITY PARK PERMIT FEES 3.1 Outdoor Facilities (Continued) Fields Aldergrove Aldergrove Bowl $107 $107 Aldergrove Sedge Field $85 $85 Boundary Bay Centennial Beach Field $85 $85 Campbell Valley Little River Bowl $85 $85 Campbell Valley Little River Field $85 $85 Campbell Valley Rowlatt Farm Field $107 $107 Campbell Valley Rowlatt Farm Enhanced Field (with $265 $265 access to electrical power and washrooms) Campbell Valley Picnic Terrace $85 $85 Capilano River Cleveland Dam Field $85 $85 Crippen Middle Field $85 $85 Crippen Snug Cove Field $85 $85 Crippen Snug Cove Ball Diamond $85 $85 Deas Island Fisher's Field $85 $85 Lynn Headwaters Lynn Headwaters Field $85 $85 Pacific Spirit Plains of Abraham $85 $85 Miscellaneous Outdoor Facilities Belcarra Belcarra Wharf Reserved Mooring $75, per hour $75, per hour Campbell Valley Campbell Downs Equestrian Centre $140 $140 Campbell Valley Equestrian Centre Overflow Parking Lot $83 $83 Campbell Valley MacLean Pond $26 $26 Campsites Fee, per night Youth group fee, per night Campbell Valley Camp Coyote Group Camp $204 $102 Deas Island Muskrat Meadows Group Camp $204 $102 Tynehead Raven's Nest Group Camp $204 $102 Seniors/Persons with disabilities fee, per night Derby Reach Edgewater Bar Campground Site $24 $21 Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, 2015 Page 5 of 7 Regional Parks Committee 15

16 Section 3.0 REGIONAL PARK FACILITY PARK PERMIT FEES (Continued) 3.2 Indoor Facilities Fee Youth group fee Capilano River Camp Capilano Overnight rental $1,020, per $428, per night night Day use, from 9am $510, per day $214, per day to 5pm Late checkout $200, per hour $200, per hour Lifeguarding $36, per hour $36, per hour service Boundary Bay Cammidge Facility rental $63, per hour n/a House Tent or Over $255, per day n/a Occupancy Limit Late checkout $200, per hour n/a Deas Island Inverholme Facility rental $52, per hour n/a Schoolhouse Minnekhada Minnekhada Facility rental $82, per hour n/a Lodge Late checkout $200, per hour n/a Lynn Headwaters BC Mills House Facility rental $16, per hour n/a 4.0 PRIVATE EVENT PARK PERMIT FEES Event Description Number of Participants & Spectators Fee Simple event Up to 300 persons $257, per day Complex event 301 to 500 persons $385, per day Large event Over 500 persons $515, per day Camping outside of designated campsites n/a $6 per person, per night Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, 2015 Page 6 of 7 Regional Parks Committee 16

17 5.0 SECURITY DEPOSITS AND CANCELLATION FEES 5.1 Security Deposits Park Permit Facility Security Deposit Commercial Use Permit $105 Facility Reservation Permit Rowlatt Farm Enhanced Field (with $500 access to electrical power and washrooms) Facility Reservation Permit Camp Capilano $200 Facility Reservation Permit Cammidge House $500 Facility Reservation Permit Inverholme Schoolhouse $500 Facility Reservation Permit Minnekhada Lodge $500 Facility Reservation Permit BC Mills House $ Cancellation Fees Park Permit Cancellation Notification Period Fee Outdoor Facilities, More than 2 months prior to the $25 See Schedule A section 3.1 rental date 2 months or less prior to the rental 100% of fee paid date Indoor Facilities, See Schedule A section 3.2 More than 6 months prior to the rental date 50% of security deposit 6 months or less prior to the rental date 100% of security deposit Private Events, More than 2 months prior to the $25 See Schedule A section 4.0 event date 2 months or less prior to the event 100% of fee paid date Private Group, At least 14 days prior to the $25 See Part 12 section12.1 program date Fewer than 14 days prior to the program date 100% of fee paid Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 1218, 2015 Page 7 of 7 Regional Parks Committee 17

18 5.2 To: From: Regional Parks Committee Gudrun Jensen, Division Manager Parks Visitor and Operations Services, Policy, Planning and Environment Department Date: February 23, 2015 Meeting Date: March 31, 2015 Subject: Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 RECOMMENDATION That the GVRD Board: a) give first, second and third reading to Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 ; and b) pass and finally adopt Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, PURPOSE To authorize amendments to Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Bylaw No. 1117, BACKGROUND While compliance to the provisions of the Regional Park Regulation Bylaw is primarily promoted through education, advisories and warnings, in some cases and for some offences more serious measures are warranted. The Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Bylaw enables Metro Vancouver to enforce compliance through the issuance of Notices of Bylaw Violation (NBVs) with accompanying fines. NBVs are intended to be the main enforcement option. They provide an administrative ticketing alternative where disputes are screened, heard and resolved inhouse through the adjudication process. Amendments to the Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Bylaw are periodically required to keep the Bylaw current; in the present case to reflect changes that have been made to the Regional Parks Division s organizational structure and to the Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw. The proposed amendments to the Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Bylaw include: a) Updates to the list of Screening Officers; b) Updates to the list of Bylaw Enforcement Officers; and c) The addition in Schedule A of an offence for Abandoning Non Park Property. Screening Officer Amendments Screening Officers review circumstances surrounding a Notice of Bylaw Violation as part of the dispute process. The proposed changes to the Screening Officer positions list include: a) Updated titles for Division Manager Parks and Operations Services, and Supervisor Parks Operations and Maintenance Systems; and b) The addition of the positions of Division Manager Environmental Regulation and Enforcement, and Enforcement Lead Engineer. Regional Parks Committee 18

19 Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Regional Parks Committee Meeting: March 31, 2015 Page 2 of 2 Bylaw Enforcement Officer Amendments Proposed amendments to the list of designated Bylaw Enforcement Officers empowered to issue NBVs include: a) Updates to Municipal Police and RCMP titles; b) The addition of Division Manager Electoral Area and Environment, Division Manager Corporate Safety, and Security and Crime Prevention Coordinator to assist with enforcement of Electoral Area Bylaws; and c) The removal of Electoral Area Administration Manager to reflect current organizational structure. Schedule A Amendment For the GVRD Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw Number 1177, 2012 the offence Abandoning Park Property with a penalty of $125 is added to assist in addressing situations where items such as bicycles or kayaks are left in a regional park, not as garbage or litter, but for personal or others use. ALTERNATIVES 1. That the GVRD Board: a) give first, second and third reading to Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 ; and b) pass and finally adopt Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, That the GVRD Board provide alternate direction to staff. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Fines associated with regulatory bylaws are not intended to comprise a stable revenue stream but do help to offset costs for in house NBV disputes adjudication. For Regional Parks, fines are based on risk with the maximum legislated fines assigned to those offences with the greatest potential loss. SUMMARY / CONCLUSION Staff recommend Alternative 1. This amending bylaw updates the lists of Screening Officers and Bylaw Enforcement Officers, and adds an offence for Abandoning Non Park Property. Attachment: (DOC ) Greater Vancouver Regional District Bylaw No. 1219, Regional Parks Committee 19

20 5.2 Attachment GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO. 1219, 2015 A Bylaw to Amend Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Bylaw No. 1117, 2010 WHEREAS the Board of Directors of the Greater Vancouver Regional District has adopted Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Bylaw No. 1117, 2010, a bylaw respecting the enforcement of Notices of Bylaw Violation and establishing a Bylaw Violation Dispute Adjudication System; and WHEREAS the Board of Directors of the Greater Vancouver Regional District wishes to amend Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Bylaw No. 1117, 2010 ; NOW THEREFORE the Board of Directors of the Greater Vancouver Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Bylaw No. 1117, 2010 is hereby amended as follows: a) Section 7.2 is deleted and replaced by the following: 7.2 The following are designated titles of persons that are appointed as Screening Officers: (a) Division Manager Parks Visitor and Operations Services; (b) Supervisor Parks Operations and Maintenance Systems; (c) Environmental Control Officer; (d) Division Manager Environmental Regulation and Enforcement; and (e) Environmental Regulation and Enforcement Lead Engineer. b) Section 9.1 is deleted and replaced by the following: 9.1 Persons acting as any of the following are hereby designated as Bylaw Enforcement Officers for the purposes of this Bylaw and the Act: (a) GVRD Park Officer; (b) Royal Canadian Mounted Police Officer; Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Page 1 of 13 Regional Parks Committee 20

21 (c) Municipal Police Officer; (d) British Columbia Provincial Conservation Officer; (e) any person appointed by the GVRD Board to be an officer pursuant to section 31(2) of the Environmental Management Act; (f) Division Manager Electoral Area and Environment; (g) Building Inspector; (h) Regional Planner; (i) Division Manager Corporate Safety; (j) Emergency Preparedness and Security Coordinator; (k) Local Assistant to the Fire Commissioner; and (l) Security and Crime Prevention Coordinator. c) Schedule A is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the attached Schedule A. 2. This bylaw shall be cited as Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME THIS day of, PASSED AND FINALLY ADOPTED THIS day of, Greg Moore, Chair Chris Plagnol, Corporate Officer Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Page 2 of 13 Regional Parks Committee 21

22 Schedule A Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Section Authorized Words or Expressions Discounted Penalty Penalty Late Payment Penalty Compliance Agreement Available GVRD Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw No. 1177, 2012 (amended) 2.5 Failure to Assist Park Officer $190 $250 $310 No 2.5(d) Failure to Obey Order $190 $250 $310 No 2.6 Obstruction of Park Officer $375 $500 $500 No 2.7 Misleading Park Officer $190 $250 $310 No 3.1 Failure to Obey Bylaw $375 $500 $500 No 3.2 Failure to Obey Posted Notice $190 $250 $310 No 3.3 In Park When Closed $190 $250 $310 Yes 3.4 Destroying or Damaging Park Property $375 $500 $500 No 3.4(d) Unauthorized Structure $95 $125 $155 No 3.4(f) Removing Park Property $375 $500 $500 No 3.4(g) Abandoning Non Park Property $95 $125 $155 No 3.6 Interfering with Park Permit $190 $250 $310 No 3.7 Inadequate Supervision of Young Person $95 $125 $155 No 4.1 Dangerous or Offensive Conduct $375 $500 $500 No 4.2 Possessing Dangerous Device $375 $500 $500 No Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Page 3 of 13 Regional Parks Committee 22

23 4.3 Defecating or Urinating Where Not Allowed $95 $125 $155 No 4.4 Undue Noise or Disturbance $190 $250 $310 No 5.1 Off Road or Trail $375 $500 $500 No 5.2 Obstructing Road or Trail $375 $500 $500 No 5.3 Unauthorized Group Gathering $95 $125 $155 No 5.4 Unauthorized Activity $95 $125 $155 No 6.1 Smoking $375 $500 $500 No 6.2 Discarding Burning Substance $375 $500 $500 No 6.3 Use of Flame Producing Device Where Not Allowed $375 $500 $500 No 6.4 Open Fire $375 $500 $500 No 6.5 Fireworks $375 $500 $500 No 7.2 Depositing Waste $375 $500 $500 No 7.4 Littering $95 $125 $155 No 8.1 Animal Not Under Control $95 $125 $155 No 8.2 Disorderly Animal $95 $125 $155 No 8.3 Dangerous Animal $375 $500 $500 No 8.4 Unleashed Animal $190 $250 $310 Yes 8.6 Dog Feces Left $95 $125 $155 No 8.7 Dog Where Not Allowed $190 $250 $310 No 8.8 Dog Not Leashed Near Horse $190 $250 $310 No 8.10 Horse Where Not Allowed $190 $250 $310 No Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Page 4 of 13 Regional Parks Committee 23

24 8.11 Disturbing An Animal $190 $250 $310 No 8.13 Feeding An Animal $95 $125 $155 No 8.14 Abandoning An Animal $95 $125 $155 No 9.1 Swimming Where Not Allowed $190 $250 $310 No 9.2 Tampering with Float or Lifesaving Device $375 $500 $500 No 9.3 Mooring Where Not Allowed $375 $500 $500 No 10.2 Unauthorized Use of Motor Vehicle $375 $500 $500 No 10.3 Unauthorized Use of Motor Assisted Cycle 10.4 All Terrain Vehicle or Motorized Device $95 $125 $155 No $190 $250 $310 No 10.5 Parking Without Permit $95 $125 $155 No 10.6 Unauthorized Parking $95 $125 $155 No 10.8 Cleaning or Repairing Vehicle $95 $125 $155 No 11.1 Commercial Activity Without Permit $375 $500 $500 Yes 13.3(a) Failure to Pay Permit Fees or Charges $190 $250 $310 No 13.3(b) Failure to Comply With Permit $375 $500 $500 No GVRD Air Quality Management Bylaw No. 1082, Burning unauthorized fuel in residential fireplace or stove 8 Improper use of residential fireplace or stove. 11(4) Violation of permit monitoring requirement $95 $125 $155 Yes $95 $125 $155 Yes $190 $250 $310 Yes Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Page 5 of 13 Regional Parks Committee 24

25 11(5) Violation of permit record keeping or reporting requirement 13 Violation of approval monitoring requirement 13 Violation of approval record keeping or reporting requirement 31 Removing, tampering with or interfering with monitoring equipment $95 $125 $155 Yes $190 $250 $310 Yes $95 $125 $155 Yes $375 $500 $500 No 33 Failure to provide reasonable access $290 $375 $460 Yes Concrete and Concrete Products Industries Emission Regulation Bylaw No. 1084, Failure to register $190 $250 $310 Yes 8 Failure to pay registration fee $190 $250 $310 Yes 10 Failure to pay annual fee $190 $250 $310 Yes 11(2) Fugitive dust visible beyond plant boundary 14 Failure to report or take corrective action for an emergency or like condition $190 $250 $310 Yes $290 $375 $460 Yes 15 Improperly equipped storage silo $190 $250 $310 Yes 16 Ineffective fabric filter system during cement or flyash unloading 18 Ineffective fabric filter systems during concrete batching operations 19 Ineffective fabric filter system during drying, mixing or bagging operations $375 $500 $500 Yes $190 $250 $310 Yes $375 $500 $500 Yes Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Page 6 of 13 Regional Parks Committee 25

26 21 Failure to minimize fugitive dust from active operations $190 $250 $310 Yes 24 Failure to keep records $95 $125 $155 Yes 25 Failure to retain or produce records $95 $125 $140 Yes Gasoline Distribution Emission Regulation Bylaw No. 1085, Failure to register $190 $250 $310 Yes 8 Failure to pay registration fees $190 $250 $310 Yes 10 Failure to pay annual fees terminal or bulk plant 11 Failure to pay annual fees fuel transfer vehicle 12 Failure to pay annual fee service station $190 $250 $310 Yes $190 $250 $310 Yes $190 $250 $310 Yes Gasoline Distribution Terminals 17 Gasoline transfer without vapour balancing system 18 Improper gasoline transfer at a distribution terminal 20 Interfering with vapour recovery system through scheduled maintenance 21 Failure to notify of inoperative vapour recovery system 22 Failure to provide employees or operators with written procedures or training $375 $500 $500 Yes $375 $500 $500 Yes $190 $250 $310 Yes $190 $250 $310 Yes $95 $125 $155 Yes Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Page 7 of 13 Regional Parks Committee 26

27 23 Failure to report control works malfunction $190 $250 $310 Yes 26 Failure to keep records $95 $125 $155 Yes 27 Failure to retain or produce records $95 $125 $155 Yes 27(4) Failure to submit annual report $95 $125 $155 Yes Bulk Plants 29 Gasoline storage tank not equipped with adequate vapour balancing system 32 Failure to provide employees or operators with written procedures or training $375 $500 $500 Yes $95 $125 $155 Yes 35 Failure to keep records $95 $125 $155 Yes 36 Failure to retain or produce records $95 $125 $155 Yes 36(4) Failure to submit annual report $95 $125 $155 Yes Fuel Transfer Vehicles 38 Fuel transfer vehicle not equipped with adequate vapour recovery system $375 $500 $500 Yes 44 Failure to keep records $95 $125 $155 Yes 45 Failure to retain or produce records $95 $125 $155 Yes 45(4) Failure to submit annual report $95 $125 $155 Yes Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Page 8 of 13 Regional Parks Committee 27

28 Service Stations 47 Inadequate vapour controls or equipment for submerged filling of storage tanks $290 $375 $460 Yes 51 Failure to retain records $95 $125 $155 Yes 52 Failure to produce records $95 $125 $155 Yes Automotive Refinishing Emission Regulation Bylaw No. 1086, Failure to register $190 $250 $310 Yes 8 Failure to pay registration fee $190 $250 $310 Yes 10 Failure to pay annual fees $190 $250 $310 Yes 14(2) Failure to post or maintain spray gun operating parameters $95 $125 $155 Yes 20(1) Failure to certify technician(s) $190 $250 $310 Yes 20(2) Failure to post or maintain technician certification $95 $125 $155 Yes 21 Failure to keep records $95 $125 $155 Yes 22 Failure to retain or produce records $95 $125 $155 Yes Boilers and Process Heaters Emission Regulation Bylaw No. 1087, Failure to register natural gas or propane fuelled boilers 7 Failure to register biomass fuelled boilers $190 $250 $310 Yes $190 $250 $310 Yes 10 Failure to pay registration fee $190 $250 $310 Yes 12 Failure to pay annual fees $190 $250 $310 Yes Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Page 9 of 13 Regional Parks Committee 28

29 18 Unauthorized bypass of control works 28 Unauthorized emission stack less than 20 meters high 31 Failure to conduct emission testing as required 31(6) Emission testing without required notice 33 Failure to comply with emission testing methodology $375 $500 $500 Yes $190 $250 $310 Yes $190 $250 $310 Yes $95 $125 $155 Yes $190 $250 $310 Yes 34 Failure to keep records $95 $125 $155 Yes 35 Failure to retain records $95 $125 $155 Yes 36 Failure to produce records $95 $125 $155 Yes 37(1) Failure to submit emission exceedance results within 5 days of testing 37(2) Failure to submit emission testing results within 60 days of testing $190 $250 $310 Yes $95 $125 $155 Yes Agricultural Boilers Emission Regulation Bylaw No. 1098, Failure to register natural gas or propane boiler $190 $250 $310 Yes 7 Failure to register biomass boiler $190 $250 $310 Yes 10 Failure to pay registration fee $190 $250 $310 Yes 12 Failure to pay annual fees $190 $250 $310 Yes 23 Emission limits exceeded biomass boiler $375 $500 $500 Yes Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Page 10 of 13 Regional Parks Committee 29

30 26 Unauthorized emission stack less than 15 meters high 30 Failure to conduct emission testing as required 32 Failure to comply with emission testing methodology 32 Emission testing without required notice. $190 $250 $310 Yes $190 $250 $310 Yes $190 $250 $310 Yes $95 $125 $155 Yes 33 Failure to keep records $95 $125 $155 Yes 34 Failure to retain records $95 $125 $155 Yes 35 Failure to produce records $95 $125 $155 Yes 36 Failure to submit emission testing results $95 $125 $155 Yes Greater Vancouver Regional District Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw No. 1144, (1) Use land or building contrary to bylaw $190 $250 $310 No Greater Vancouver Regional District Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw No. 1043, (2) Obstruct Building Official $190 $250 $310 No 109(3) Fail to stop work $375 $500 $500 No 201(1) Construction without a permit $375 $500 $500 No 201(2) Occupy without approval $190 $250 $310 No 201(3) Submit false information $190 $250 $310 No 201(4) Tamper with posted notice $190 $250 $310 No 201(5) Work contrary to approved plans $190 $250 $310 No 210(1) Fail to post building permit $190 $250 $310 No Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Page 11 of 13 Regional Parks Committee 30

31 Greater Vancouver Regional District Electoral Area A Unsightly Premises and Nuisance Bylaw No. 1198, Cause or allow unsightly property $190 $250 $310 No 2.2 Cause or allow nuisance $190 $250 $310 No 2.3 Cause or allow recurrent water ponding 2.3 Cause or allow unstable soil conditions $190 $250 $310 No $190 $250 $310 No 2.3 Cause or allow erosion $190 $250 $310 No 2.4(a) 2.4(b) Failure to maintain structurally sound building Failure to maintain doors and windows $190 $250 $310 No $190 $250 $310 No 2.4(c) Failure to maintain roof $190 $250 $310 No 2.4(d) Failure to maintain interior walls or ceilings 2.5 Failure to maintain dock $190 $250 $310 No 4.4 Failure to comply with directive $190 $250 $310 No 4.4 Failure to undertake remedial action $190 $250 $310 No Greater Vancouver Regional District Non Road Diesel Emission Regulation Bylaw No. 1161, Failure to register $190 $250 $310 Yes 14 Obstruction by an operator $95 $125 $155 Yes 18 Operation of engine without Tier label 19 Failure to display registration No. or Tier label during operation $95 $125 $155 Yes $95 $125 $155 Yes Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Page 12 of 13 Regional Parks Committee 31

32 21 Failure to keep low use engine records 22 Failure to comply with records requirements 32 Operating a prohibited Tier 0 engine 33 Operating a prohibited Tier 1 engine $95 $125 $155 Yes $95 $125 $155 Yes $375 $500 $500 Yes $375 $500 $500 Yes 35 Unauthorized engine idling $190 $250 $310 Yes 37 Failure to submit anti idling procedure $95 $125 $155 Yes Greater Vancouver Regional District Notice of Bylaw Violation Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication Amending Bylaw No. 1219, 2015 Page 13 of 13 Regional Parks Committee 32

33 5.3 To: From: Regional Parks Committee Gudrun Jensen, Division Manager Parks Visitor and Operations Services, Policy, Planning and Environment Department Date: February 23, 2015 Meeting Date: March 31, 2015 Subject: Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, 2015 RECOMMENDATION That the GVRD Board: a) give first, second and third reading to Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, 2015 ; and b) pass and finally adopt Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, PURPOSE To authorize amendments to Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 1050, BACKGROUND Although compliance to the Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw is primarily promoted through education, advisories and warnings, in some cases and for some offences, more serious measures are warranted. The Ticket Information Utilization bylaw enables Metro Vancouver to enforce compliance with the Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw by authorizing officers to issue Municipal Ticket Informations (MTIs) with accompanying fines. MTIs are intended for exceptional circumstances. They require prior approval before being issued because of the potential impact on resources, and the uncertainty inherent in court actions. From time to time amendments are required to keep the Bylaw current; in this case to reflect organizational changes, update language, and to reflect a change in the Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw. The proposed amendments to the Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw include: a) In Schedule A, updating language and the designated bylaw enforcement officers for Environmental Regulation and Electoral Area bylaws; and b) In Schedule B, adding an offence for Abandoning Non Park Property. Schedule A Amendments Schedule A lists the Metro Vancouver regulatory bylaws that may be enforced by means of an MTI, and the Bylaw Enforcement Officers empowered to issue MTIs for each regulatory bylaw. The proposed changes: a) Update language from Municipal Police and RCMP Constable to Officer for the Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw; b) For every environmental regulatory bylaw, change Officer to Any person appointed by the GVRD Board to be an officer pursuant to section 31(2) of the Environmental Management Act ; Regional Parks Committee 33

34 Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, 2015 Regional Parks Committee Meeting: March 31, 2015 Page 2 of 2 c) For the Electoral Area bylaws remove Building Official, Enforcement Officer and Park Officer, as applicable; and d) For every Electoral Area bylaw ensure the list of designated Bylaw Enforcement Officers includes Division Manager Electoral Area and Environment Building Inspector Regional Planner Division Manager Corporate Safety Emergency Preparedness and Security Coordinator Local Assistant to the Fire Commissioner Security and Crime Prevention Officer. Schedule B Amendment For the GVRD Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw Number 1177, 2012 the offence Abandoning Park Property with a penalty of $250 is added to assist in addressing situations where items such as bicycles or kayaks are left in a regional park, not as garbage or litter, but for personal or others use. ALTERNATIVES 1. That the GVRD Board: a) give first, second and third reading to Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, 2015 ; and b) pass and finally adopt Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, That the GVRD Board provide alternate direction to staff. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Fines associated with regulatory bylaws are not intended to comprise a stable revenue stream but do help to offset costs for MTI court disputes. For Regional Parks, fines are based on the level of risk. MTI fines are twice those of the Notice of Bylaw Violation fine for the corresponding offence. SUMMARY / CONCLUSION Staff recommend Alternative 1. This amending bylaw adds an offence for Abandoning Non Park Property and updates the list of Enforcement Officers. Attachment: (DOC ) Greater Vancouver Regional District Bylaw No. 1220, Regional Parks Committee 34

35 5.3 Attachment GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO. 1220, 2015 A Bylaw to Amend Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 1050, 2006 WHEREAS the Board of Directors of the Greater Vancouver Regional District has adopted Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 1050, 2006, a bylaw to authorize the use of the municipal ticket information for the enforcement of certain bylaws, to designate persons as bylaw enforcement officers, to authorize the use of certain words or expressions to designate certain bylaw offences and to set certain fine amounts; and WHEREAS the Board of Directors of the Greater Vancouver Regional District wishes to amend Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 1050, 2006 ; NOW THEREFORE the Board of Directors of the Greater Vancouver Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 1050, 2006 is hereby amended as follows: a) Schedule A is deleted and replaced by the attached Schedule A. b) Schedule B is deleted and replaced by the attached Schedule B. 2. This bylaw shall be cited as Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME THIS day of, PASSED AND FINALLY ADOPTED THIS day of, Greg Moore, Chair Chris Plagnol, Corporate Officer Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, 2015 Page 1 of 5 Regional Parks Committee 35

36 Schedule A Column 1 Designated Bylaws 1 Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw No. 1177, Greater Vancouver Regional District Air Quality Management Bylaw No. 1082, Greater Vancouver Regional District Concrete and Concrete Products Industries Emission Regulation No. 1084, Greater Vancouver Regional District Gasoline Distribution Emission Regulation No. 1085, Greater Vancouver Regional District Automotive Refinishing Emission Regulation Bylaw No. 1086, Greater Vancouver Regional District Boilers and Process Heaters Emission Regulation Bylaw No. 1087, Greater Vancouver Regional District Agricultural Boilers Emission Regulation Bylaw No. 1098, Greater Vancouver Regional District Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw No. 1144, 2011 Column 2 Designated Bylaw Enforcement Officers Park Officer Royal Canadian Mounted Police Officer Municipal Police Officer British Columbia Provincial Conservation Officer Any person appointed by the GVRD Board to be an officer pursuant to section 31(2) of the Environmental Management Act Any person appointed by the GVRD Board to be an officer pursuant to section 31(2) of the Environmental Management Act Any person appointed by the GVRD Board to be an officer pursuant to section 31(2) of the Environmental Management Act Any person appointed by the GVRD Board to be an officer pursuant to section 31(2) of the Environmental Management Act Any person appointed by the GVRD Board to be an officer pursuant to section 31(2) of the Environmental Management Act Any person appointed by the GVRD Board to be an officer pursuant to section 31(2) of the Environmental Management Act Division Manager Electoral Area & Environment Building Inspector Regional Planner Division Manager Corporate Safety Emergency Preparedness & Security Coordinator Local Assistant to the Fire Commissioner Security and Crime Prevention Officer Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, 2015 Page 2 of 5 Regional Parks Committee 36

37 9 Greater Vancouver Regional District Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw No. 1043, Greater Vancouver Regional District Non Road Diesel Engine Emission Regulation Bylaw No. 1161, Greater Vancouver Regional District Electoral Area A Unsightly Premises and Nuisance Bylaw No. 1198, 2014 Division Manager Electoral Area & Environment Building Inspector Regional Planner Division Manager Corporate Safety Emergency Preparedness & Security Coordinator Local Assistant to the Fire Commissioner Security and Crime Prevention Officer Any person appointed by the GVRD Board to be an officer pursuant to section 31(2) of the Environmental Management Act Division Manager Electoral Area & Environment Building Inspector Regional Planner Division Manager Corporate Safety Emergency Preparedness & Security Coordinator Local Assistant to the Fire Commissioner Security and Crime Prevention Officer Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, 2015 Page 3 of 5 Regional Parks Committee 37

38 Schedule B Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw No. 1177, 2012 (amended) Column 1 Authorized Words or Expressions Column 2 Section Column 3 Fine Failure to Assist Park Officer 2.5 $500 Failure to Obey Order 2.5(d) $500 Obstruction of Park Officer 2.6 $1000 Misleading Park Officer 2.7 $500 Failure to Obey Bylaw 3.1 $1000 Failure to Obey Posted Notice 3.2 $500 In Park When Closed 3.3 $500 Destroying or Damaging Park Property 3.4 $1000 Unauthorized Structure 3.4(d) $250 Removing Park Property 3.4(f) $500 Abandoning Non Park Property 3.4(g) $250 Interfering with Park Permit 3.6 $500 Inadequate Supervision of Young Person 3.7 $250 Dangerous or Offensive Conduct 4.1 $1000 Possessing Dangerous Device 4.2 $1000 Defecating or Urinating Where Not Allowed 4.3 $250 Undue Noise or Disturbance 4.4 $500 Off Road or Trail 5.1 $1000 Obstructing Road or Trail 5.2 $1000 Unauthorized Group Gathering 5.3 $250 Unauthorized Activity 5.4 $250 Smoking 6.1 $1000 Discarding Burning Substance 6.2 $1000 Use of Flame Producing Device Where Not Allowed 6.3 $1000 Open Fire 6.4 $1000 Fireworks 6.5 $1000 Depositing Waste 7.2 $1000 Littering 7.4 $250 Animal Not Under Control 8.1 $250 Disorderly Animal 8.2 $250 Dangerous Animal 8.3 $1000 Unleashed Animal 8.4 $500 Dog Feces Left 8.6 $250 Dog Where Not Allowed 8.7 $500 Dog Not Leashed Near Horse 8.8 $500 Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, 2015 Page 4 of 5 Regional Parks Committee 38

39 Schedule B (Continued) Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Parks Regulation Bylaw No. 1177, 2012 (amended) Horse Where Not Allowed 8.10 $500 Disturbing An Animal 8.11 $500 Feeding An Animal 8.13 $250 Abandoning An Animal 8.14 $250 Swimming Where Not Allowed 9.1 $500 Tampering with Float or Lifesaving Device 9.2 $1000 Mooring Where Not Allowed 9.3 $1000 Unauthorized Use of Motor Vehicle 10.2 $1000 Unauthorized Use of Motor Assisted Cycle 10.3 $250 All Terrain Vehicle or Motorized Device 10.4 $500 Parking Without Permit 10.5 $250 Unauthorized Parking 10.6 $250 Cleaning or Repairing Vehicle 10.8 $250 Commercial Activity Without Permit 11.1 $1000 Failure to Pay Permit Fees or Charges 13.3(a) $500 Failure to Comply With Permit 13.3(b) $ Greater Vancouver Regional District Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 1220, 2015 Page 5 of 5 Regional Parks Committee 39

40 5.4 To: From: Regional Parks Committee Jamie Vala, Park Planner, Planning, Policy and Environment Department Date: March 4, 2015 Meeting Date: March 31, 2015 Subject: Colony Farm Regional Park Sheep Paddocks Pedestrian Only Trail Feasibility Options RECOMMENDATION That the Regional Parks Committee: a) receive for information the report dated March 4, 2015, titled Colony Farm Regional Park Sheep Paddocks Pedestrian Only Trail Feasibility Options ; and b) direct staff to halt feasibility testing of the Sheep Paddocks pedestrian only trail option at this time, and report back at a future date on the need for additional park trails once the multi use trail has been constructed and has had a full year of operation. PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to inform the Regional Parks Committee of the work to date on the feasibility of a pedestrian only trail in the Sheep Paddocks area of Colony Farm Regional Park and proposed next steps. BACKGROUND On May 2, 2014, the GVRD Board passed the following resolution: That the GVRD Board direct staff to proceed with detailed design of a multi use trail, comprised of a southern riverside route and a northern inland route, providing a connection from Colony Farm Regional Park to the Pitt River Bridge; and direct staff to further explore options for 1B, as presented in the February 14, 2014 report titled "Colony Farm Regional Park Sheep Paddocks Trail: Route Selection. History The Sheep Paddocks Trail (Attachment 1) was a popular trail in Colony Farm Regional Park. It was a narrow trail along the banks of the Coquitlam River through a deciduous riparian forest. Due to safety concerns from sloughing of the trail, erosion and sink holes, the trail was closed in In 2013, a consultant team evaluated new options for the trail route. During a public engagement process on the options, some members of the public expressed a preference for a multi use trail that connected to the PoCo Traboulay Trail, while other participants supported the idea of a pedestrian only trail along the old alignment, or no trail at all. The sensitive ecosystem inventory analysis identifies the Sheep Paddocks area as the most sensitive area of the park, largely due to the dynamic nature of the water systems (marsh, creeks and the Coquitlam River) and the presence of key habitat for several species at risk. Regional Parks Committee 40

41 Colony Farm Regional Park Sheep Paddocks Pedestrian Only Trail Feasibility Options Regional Parks Committee Meeting: March 31, 2015 Page 2 of 5 In 2014, the GVRD Board directed staff to proceed with the design of the multi use trail that followed the old Sheep Paddocks route along the southern portion and included a new northern route that followed the hydro corridor. The GVRD Board also directed staff to further explore options for a pedestrian only route along the northern alignment of the old trail. Several factors helped to inform the decision for the multi use trail: the Regional Park Visitor Survey (2013), identified 31% of the park visitors arrive by bicycle (double the overall average to Regional Parks); the Sheep Paddocks Trail connects on either end to multi use trails as part of the PoCo Traboulay Trail; municipalities of Coquitlam and Port Coquitlam preferred a multi use trail; and there are a number of challenges associated with the northern (riverside) section (~800m) of the Sheep Paddocks Trail including o over 100m of trail length is expected to flood annually due to low elevation o preliminary examinations indicate approximately 300 m of stream bank stabilization may be required o five stream crossings are required o trail would be closed annually due to flooding, flood damage, and repair o annual maintenance costs due to flooding for old trail ranged from $7000 $35,000 not including major repair. The design of the multi use trail is currently underway. In following Board direction staff have also been exploring the feasibility of a pedestrian only trail along the northern portion of the old Sheep Paddocks Trail. Details of this exploration are provided below. Public Input A public workshop was held on February 4, 2015 in Coquitlam. Invitations were sent to the Colony Farm Park Association, Burke Mountain Naturalists, the Colony Farm Community Gardeners Society, and the Riverview Horticultural Society. Individual invitations were also sent to those who had previously indicated that they were interested in this issue. Additionally, posters were placed throughout the park, and social media and the Metro Vancouver website were used to advertise the event. The public workshop was attended by 18 people Background information and a questionnaire were available online; a total of 31 questionnaires were completed. For additional information refer to Attachment 2 (Graphic Summary of Questionnaire Results) and Attachment 3 (Feasibility Workshop Notes). In summary, there are still two positions on this issue: those who do not see the need for another trail in this area, and those who seek the experience that this section of the old Sheep Paddocks Trail at one time provided. The first group believes that conservation should be given priority over recreation in this area of the regional park. The second group also feels strongly that the environmental values of the area need to be protected; however, this group believes that with appropriate, low impact construction methods, a rustic trail would be a compatible use. The workshop and the questionnaire focused on three issues: trail experience, environment, and trail management. Seventeen respondents identified the environment as their first priority over Regional Parks Committee 41

42 Colony Farm Regional Park Sheep Paddocks Pedestrian Only Trail Feasibility Options Regional Parks Committee Meeting: March 31, 2015 Page 3 of 5 trail experience and trail management. Twenty one respondents felt that a pedestrian trail was a worthwhile trade off between conservation and recreation values. Nineteen respondents preferred a trail to be managed and maintained by Metro Vancouver but below typical park standards (e.g., a standard that included closures due to flooding, a bare earth surface, non standard crossings, lower maintenance and fewer patrols). Some members of the public (6 respondents) showed an interest in participating in the maintenance and construction of the trail. There was awareness of safety and liability concerns around the trail and general consensus that stabilization and major construction works should be undertaken by Metro Vancouver. There was also acknowledgement that Metro Vancouver would likely still need to support volunteer efforts and that volunteers are sometimes unavailable at times when work needs to be done. There was little interest from those that participated in the workshop in entering into a formal agreement with Metro Vancouver and taking responsibility for the trail. This public engagement process confirmed what staff heard last year from the public. Opinion is divided on whether this trail should be rebuilt; however, there is consensus to have a trail connection between the park and Pitt River Road. This connection will be achieved with the multiuse trail. Challenges and Constructability The total trail length being examined for the pedestrian only section of the Sheep Paddocks Trail is approximately 800m. The consultant s report, Sheep Paddocks Trail Alignment Analysis (2013), identified that approximately 300m of river bank would need stabilization (rip rap or wooden crib walls) to address the issues of sloughing, erosion, and sink holes that caused the trail to be closed. This work usually requires large machinery and causes disturbance of the riverbank in the short term. Stream bank stabilization costs approximately $1,000 per linear metre. This work makes up a significant portion of the cost of the rebuilding the trail. In some areas it may be possible to move the trail away from the river using boardwalk. However, as the soils are mainly peat soils, deep piles would be required to support a boardwalk. This type of boardwalk is costly to install, which means that the option would not likely result in any financial savings. As there is agreement from the public that riparian vegetation should be preserved as much as possible, small equipment and construction by hand would be necessary. This approach would reduce the impact to the environment but add to the cost of the project. For comparison, staff investigated a project in Saanich, BC, that was built using a low impact method. A portion of the Lochside trail required a 290m bridge through a marsh area to be built. To limit the disturbance footprint to the marsh, a trestle bridge design was envisioned. A lightweight skidder was used to drive more than 100 piles into the peat soils, many to a depth of 50m. The bridge was built as the piles extended out limiting the construction footprint to just 6 m for 75% of the length of the bridge. This project cost $925,000 in Regional Parks Committee 42

43 Colony Farm Regional Park Sheep Paddocks Pedestrian Only Trail Feasibility Options Regional Parks Committee Meeting: March 31, 2015 Page 4 of 5 ALTERNATIVES 1. That the Regional Parks Committee: a) receive for information the report dated March 4, 2015, titled Colony Farm Regional Park Sheep Paddocks Pedestrian Only Trail Feasibility Options ; and b) direct staff to halt feasibility testing of the Sheep Paddocks pedestrian only trail option at this time and report back at a future date on the need for additional park trails once the multi use trail has been constructed and has had a full year of operation. 2. That the Regional Parks Committee recommend that the GVRD Board direct staff to proceed with further feasibility, planning and cost estimates of a section of the Sheep Paddocks pedestrian only trail, described as option 1B, and include funding for the project as part of the 5 year capital plan. 3. That the Regional Parks Committee provide alternate direction to staff. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The $2.3 Million budget for the multi use trail was approved in the 2015 Regional Parks capital development budget, and forms part of the 5 year capital program. Preliminary estimates indicate a rustic pedestrian trail would cost between $500,000 $700,000 to construct depending on the level of stream bank stabilization and boardwalk required. These construction costs are not currently budgeted in the capital program. Should the Committee wish staff to proceed with the development of a pedestrian only trail, the 5 year capital program will need to be adjusted to include this project. OTHER IMPLICATIONS The Kwikwetlem First Nation has sent a letter outlining its deep concern over the prospect of further development and the impacts to the riparian corridor in the area of the park over which a pedestrian only trail would pass. Staff will be organizing a meeting to understand the Kwikwetlem First Nation s specific concerns. SUMMARY / CONCLUSION The old Sheep Paddocks Trail provided a unique trail experience in Colony Farm Regional Park. The public agree that the environmental values of the Sheep Paddocks area of Colony Farm Regional Park constitute the most important factor to consider when making a decision about a pedestrian trail. Views are divided, however, over whether a rustic pedestrian trail can be accommodated in this area with minimal disturbance while protecting those values. In total, 21 respondents felt that a pedestrian trail was a worthwhile tradeoff between conservation and recreation. The number of respondents to the public engagement process was low, 31 in total. The low demand coupled with the challenges and costs, both financial and environmental, of constructing a second trail in this area of the regional park have led staff to recommendation a halt to further feasibility work at this time. Staff recommends to keep the area closed to the public and monitor demand once the multi use Sheep Paddocks Trail is complete and a full year of trail operation has concluded. Staff recommend Alternative 1. Regional Parks Committee 43

44 Colony Farm Regional Park Sheep Paddocks Pedestrian Only Trail Feasibility Options Regional Parks Committee Meeting: March 31, 2015 Page 5 of 5 Attachments: (DOC ) 1. Colony Farm Regional Park Sheep Paddocks Trail Area Map 2. Colony Farm Regional Parks Sheep Paddocks Pedestrian Trail Graphic Summary of Questionnaire Results 3. Colony Farm Regional Park Sheep Paddocks Pedestrian Trail Feasibility Workshop Notes Regional Parks Committee 44

45 5.4 Attachment 1 CO LO NY FARM REG IONAL PARK Lan ds COLONY FARM REGIONAL PARK ay Railw Riv CPR Kw i k wet l e m First Nation Lands N y Hw ed Undergoing further study: Pedestrian only trail section ug Shau FPH he ghne d mr United Blvd Fa r s sy S t o ny KF Lo he wy Col L g ou Riv e r R d iew erv map detail KFN H ed Pi RW M a ry H i l l B y p a s s dr P Hy v er Trail being studied o oc il ay Tra l u o Trab BC Planned trail o Existing trails i t la Coqu ek Home Farm Dyk e Tr a il Tra i l Creek y d n Mu Sheep Paddocks Trail Cre Dyke Tr ail ndy Wilson Farm Mu m Ri Multi-use route currently undergoing detailed design. Construction in 2015/16. Regional Parks Committee m N

46 16% 31 * SHEEP PADDOCKS PEDESTRIAN TRAIL: Questionnaire Results responses workshop 18 attendees TRAIL EXPERIENCE number of responses number of responses number of responses 0% ENVIRONMENT 0% MANAGEMENT 0% 4 8 NO ANSWER 20% 20% 20% 19 INTERNAL CONNECTION ONLY 40% 60% IS A PEDESTRIAN TRAIL WORTH THE TRADE-OFF BETWEEN CONSERVATION AND RECREATION? NO ANSWER NO 40% 40% 19 TRAIL MAINTAINED BY MV, TO TYPICAL PARK STANDARD NONE OF THE ABOVE TRAIL MAINTAINED BY COMMUNITY GROUP 60% 60% CONNECTION TO POCO TRABOULAY TRAIL 21 80% YES 80% 80% 100% 100% TRAIL MAINTAINED BY MV, BELOW TYPICAL PARK STANDARDS 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% PRIORITIES 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 6 >1x per week 1-4x per month 1-4x per year Other RESPONDENT ACTIVITIES IN PARK 0% Regional 100% Parks Committee 46 { } 17 1 RESPONDENT FREQUENCY OF PARK VISITS 0% Hiking/walking Enjoying nature Birdwatching/ wildlife viewing Cycling Dog Walking Volunteering Other Jogging/running Gardening 20% 40% Other 10% Port Moody Unknown 7% Port Coquitlam 19% 0 60% 48% 80% Tri-Citie 83% Environment Experience Management Coquitlam 100% RESPONDENT CITY OF ORIGIN very small sample size Respondents ranked Environment as the most important aspect in considering a Sheep Paddocks pedestrian trail, followed by Experience. 1 MOST IMPORTANT * 5.4 Attachment 2 LEAST 2 3 IMPORTANT 3 19 February 2015

47 5.4 Attachment 3 FEASIBILITY WORKSHOP NOTES Notes from Breakout Tables The notes below are from flip charts and post-its that were generated from the breakout groups. Three topics were discussed and participants moved around, having the opportunity to discuss each of the topics. TOPIC 1 - Experience Q: What makes Sheep Paddocks Trail Special? Participants wrote ideas on Post-it Notes which were placed on a wall and were grouped by theme collaboratively by participants and facilitator (Post-it Note comments are verbatim) Areas for amphibians and reptiles wildlife isn t only large- it is also all the small insect, birds, etc birds wildlife viewing incredible bird life eg. Rufus & Anna s humming birds closeness to wildlife for viewing access to wildlife evidence of wildlife activity valuable wildlife habitat contact with nature was a definite agreement with all 3 groups- a distinction was made between the value for the wildlife itself versus the ability to access that wildlife distinct from any other trail at Colony Farm Regional Park informal character connect with narrow (mostly- till now) trail from near tennis courts in Port Coquitlam Gates Park introducing children to nature- respect, understand low use forest experience nature cottonwoods canopy tree canopy, leaf cover enclosed Regional Parks Committee 47 1

48 value the tree canopy tree canopy partial tree canopy forested photography meandering (X 3) limited sight lines meandering trail informal character natural systems at work flooding seasonal cyclical closure wilderness experience scope of wetland and estuary experience close interaction with nature trees shrubbery close to the trail not easily accessed by bike vegetation wild and lush salmon berries flowers observe plants narrow trail narrow- one person wide the trail was THIN! narrow narrow close to river (X2) different aspect of river tree canopy riparian experience near river proximity to water- sound of water, birds Regional Parks Committee 48 2

49 a trail close to the river helps people t understand dynamics of river and what rivers do over time scenic riverside experience closeness to the river, the feel of the movement of the water view the river all the way ie. ability to be close to the river for an extended distance quiet (x 2) sounds of river and wind in the woods quieter than all other trails in park quieter a quiet part of the park peaceful & quiet (relative to Lougheed Hwy) away from road value the sound of the river trail was not heavily used- had opportunity for quiet interactive nature experience relative quiet secluded better for true sake of nature to hand it over to nature people out! leave it all alone! natural habitat of greatest importance people not adhering to dog leashing- dogs in the river running uncontrolled on the trail dogs issues no dogs on walking trail too environmentally sensitive Q. Should a new pedestrian trail connect to the PoCo Traboulay Trail or just internal park trails? Benefits of connecting to the PoCo Traboulay Trail Makes sense to not connect does not Makes for a nicer walk the loop with dyke system on PoCo side No trail at all Benefits of an internal trail connection Environmental issues/ ½ access, ½ environment Cost issues especially maintenance Potentially reducing dog and cycling issues with focus on viewpoint Tying it to nature View point would be useful regardless of trail type Fewer users =beneficial Regional Parks Committee 49 3

50 TOPIC 2 Environment Several factors of environmental disturbance were discussed: How acceptable is stream bank stabilization/riparian area disturbance? No disturbance is acceptable multiple comments Some disturbance because vegetation can recover No large tree removal Heavy equipment disturbance is unacceptable Keep original width - multiple comments 50 m linear disturbance OK a little for stabilization Keep people out If this is the most environmentally sensitive area then no disturbance Any disturbance should be compensated for (some not in favour of compensation) No large tree removal they are valuable and can t be replaced Create wildlife trees topping acceptable Minimize disturbance by relaxing standards Disturbance with a purpose Less disturbance with bioengineering, better materials, less heavy machinery Least disturbance Management plan for park should set thresholds How acceptable is hazard tree removal? Some tree removal acceptable keep balance for fire protection Retain larger trees multiple comments Little as possible multiple comments Leave it to the beavers Should beaver proof trees in future as preventative measure- only in region of trail If trees removed leave in area Only for imminent safety concern Should be less of a concern as beavers operate at night Strategies for working and living with beavers Ties to management levels How acceptable is disturbance from stream crossings? Reduce impact by kind of bridge eg prebuild Where possible use a culvert with beaver box Basic simple bridges preferred Cedar only no treated lumber Acceptable if construction method can minimize damage (eg plank bridges) Don t remove any more of bridges in place Regional Parks Committee 50 4

51 TOPIC 3 - Management Trail maintenance and management options were discussed: Option 1 Maintain trail below typical park standards Opportunities Constraints Natural experience trail through woods, close to nature Might encourage kids wanting to bike on those types of trails Minimal environmental impact Are there minimum safety requirements? Discourage cyclists Closure when flooded Unique feature for this park Need signage about staying on trail Lower cost Need signage about not as physically accessible Nature education opportunities % of people won t read signs More likely to volunteer for this Will get sprawl more people wandering off trail More able to allow natural processes to heal (after flood) Risk of people going foraging (fiddleheads) if not patrolled often Option 2 Maintain trail to typical park standards Opportunities Constraints More physically accessible (disabled and strollers) More impact from bringing in materials Less observation (patrol) because of conditions Increased impact on riparian (opening/closing decision, trail safety) Keep it open longer Not feeling as close to nature Different levels of ability feel more comfortable Harder to keep cyclists off Larger environmental impact Higher cost initially and for maintenance Limited/no opportunity for volunteer involvement Cumulative impact/effects from whole trail system-edge effects Increased impact on vegetation because it is wider (more trees need to be removed) Environmental impact interfering with natural processes How will it affect beavers and fish if go too far on management Increased trail usage human-animal interactions (less savy users) Option 3 Maintained by Community Opportunities Free labour Opportunities to explore co-management Get schools involved Volunteer experience learning how to do something, experience itself Constraints Continuity of the labour Safety, training and liability Would it require supervision by more experienced people Would not be able to maintain to Park standards Regional Parks Committee 51 5

52 Least expensive re labour Co-management heal wounds between MV and community Community becomes advocates for the trial policing of cyclists Streambank stabilization still needs to be done by MV Questions around cost and maintenance standards Still has impact on staff timing- just shifting focus Needs funding to supply materials (approved materials Liability waivers ensure safety Question about the size of support group required Strategies for Pedestrian Only Trail [brainstorming] Signage Trail design Surface materials (eg wood chips) Gates Baffles Fines- enforcement Community advocates There should be no trail Should Dogs be allowed? Environmental issue Regional Parks Committee 52 6

53 5.5 To: From: Regional Parks Committee Gregory Paris, West Area Planner, Regional Parks Division, Planning, Policy and Environment Department Date: March 3, 2015 Meeting Date: March 31, 2015 Subject: Crippen Regional Park Pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden Proposal RECOMMENDATION That the Regional Parks Committee: a) direct staff, in response to public feedback, to advise the Bowen Agricultural Alliance to find a more supportable location for its Pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden Proposal; and b) thank the Bowen Agricultural Alliance for its volunteer work on the initiative. PURPOSE To report to the Regional Parks Committee on the feedback received from the community consultation on Bowen Agricultural Alliance s (BAA) proposed Pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden in the Killarney Meadows area of Crippen Regional Park. BACKGROUND At its September 9, 2014, meeting the Environment and Parks Committee authorized staff to undertake community consultation on BAA s proposal to establish a 0.7 acre demonstration garden in Killarney Meadows, and to report back on their findings (Attachment 1). Park staff and BAA held a public information meeting on the proposed initiative on Tuesday evening, December 9, Approximately 50 people attended the meeting which was held at Bowen Island Community School. BAA began the meeting by presenting its proposal. The open discussion that followed included questions about the proposal, as well as various comments on the concept and proposed location (Attachment 2). In advance of the public information meeting, a webpage on Metro Vancouver s website was available with much of the information provided in the September 2014 Committee report. BAA had information on its proposal and the meeting on the group s own website. The public information meeting was advertised in two community newspapers the Bowen Island Undercurrent and the North Shore News and was placed on the BIM Community Notice Board. Meeting notices were placed in the regional park kiosks. People were encouraged to submit comments electronically through the Metro Vancouver Information Centre, and by phone or by mail to Metro Vancouver, by Friday, January 30, The messages that Metro Vancouver received directly were consolidated into 181 submissions. In general, people were supportive of the idea of a pollinator initiative and demonstration garden; however, people expressed varying levels of interest in, support for, or enthusiasm for the specific proposal. On the proposed location in Killarney Meadows specifically, approximately 70 percent of Regional Parks Committee 53

54 Crippen Regional Park Pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden Proposal Regional Parks Committee Meeting: March 31, 2015 Page 2 of 3 submissions were not supportive. Approximately 30 percent of submissions were supportive of the proposed location. People suggested other locations on public institutional lands (e.g., municipal, school, regional district) and on private lands (attachments 3 and 4). Correspondence addressed to the BAA and Metro Vancouver opposing the proposed pollinator garden location in the regional park was received by the BAA twice and posted on the Bowen Forum website. The first time the correspondence was received it included 125 names and comments; the second time it included 311 names and signatures (Attachment 5 and 6). Through the public information process, regional parks staff gained valuable insights into the environmental, social, recreational and aesthetic values held by regional park visitors. While the Meadows is categorized as low sensitive ecosystem, this open area surrounded by forest is highly prized in its existing condition. This area was cleared in the early 1900 s and much has remained open since, as the result of decades of use as grazing land. Some of the cleared parts have returned to dense deciduous stands. Regional parks staff believe that the idea of a Pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden has attracted the interest of a broad spectrum of the local community, including environmental and educational professionals. The local community is well qualified to evaluate the various public institutional and private sites that have been identified in the feedback, and to bring forward a concept and location proposal. Should a regional parkland site be identified as a site of interest, regional park staff can become involved. Regional parks staff have communicated with BAA. While disappointed, BAA understands that the Killarney Meadows location did not receive the general community support required to move the project forward, (Attachment 7). ALTERNATIVES That the Regional Parks Committee: 1. That the Regional Parks Committee: a) direct staff, in response to public feedback, to advise the Bowen Agricultural Alliance to find a more supportable location for its Pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden Proposal; and b) thank the Bowen Agricultural Alliance for its volunteer work on the initiative. 2. That the Regional Parks Committee provide alternate direction to staff. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS There are no financial implications associated with Alternative 1. Staff time and costs incurred through this project review and public consultation process were covered under the 2014 Regional Parks budget. SUMMARY / CONCLUSION Community consultation found general support for the idea of a pollinator initiative and demonstration garden. The proposed location in Killarney Meadows for the initiative, however, did not receive sufficient support. Regional Parks Committee 54

55 Crippen Regional Park Pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden Proposal Regional Parks Committee Meeting: March 31, 2015 Page 3 of 3 Staff believe that the local community is engaged, positioned and well qualified to undertake the site evaluation and concept development required to bring forward a proposal with broad based community support to an agency or property owner. Staff recommend Alternative 1. Attachments: (DOC ) 1. Environment and Park Committee Report, September 09, Public Information Meeting Transcript by James Glave, BAA, September 9, Feedback received by the Metro Vancouver Information Centre re BAA s Proposed Pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden 4. Comments on Crippen Regional Park Proposed Pollinator Initiative and Demo Garden 5. Correspondence addressed to the Bowen Agricultural Alliance and Metro Vancouver re an alternate location for a pollinator demonstration garden on Bowne Island with a list of 125 names and comments 6. Correspondence addressed to the Bowen Agricultural Alliance and Metro Vancouver re an alternate location for a pollinator demonstration garden on Bowen Island with 311 names and signatures. 7. ed Correspondence addressed to Metro Vancouver from the Bowen Agricultural Alliance re withdraw of proposal for a native pollinators education demonstration garden in Crippen Regional Park Regional Parks Committee 55

56 Regional Parks Committee Attachment 1

57 Regional Parks Committee 57

58 Regional Parks Committee 58

59 Regional Parks Committee 59

60 Regional Parks Committee 60

61 5.5 Attachment 2 Public Information Meeting Tuesday, 09 September 2014 Crippen Regional Park Killarney Meadows BAA s Proposed Pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden Meeting transcript by James Glave, BAA Colleen: wondering about funding, who pays for it? We are looking for programming that would generate revenue that would in turn hire a part time coordinator. Greg: This is above standard budgets, we would have a land use agreement that we have with existing user groups with facilities in the park. Shari: Are there other areas cropping up like this, is it a pioneer project or are there other initiatives? Greg: There are a number of these sorts of initiatives In Vancouver with SPEC and City Farmer that are about learning and information sharing in nature. Community gardens are typically a municipal park responsibility. In Vancouver there are a number of parks that have been established with volunteer efforts. Elle: Vancouver has pollinator projects, and Leutette Farm in North Vancouver, a co-op farm and pollinator garden. They have workshops there and sell mason bees. Bruce Russell: Looking at a phased budget? Elle: Preliminary budget, how much for capital costs and how much to operate. Q: Your role as Metro Vancouver is to consent to it or not? Greg: Tom and I are with the Parks Department. Our responsibility is the park. Some of the other things that were mentioned about ecological health action plan, these are other parts of Metro Vancouver that are involved in regional planning. These sorts of things are examples of what can be done that get dovetailed with municipal actions. The action plan is more of a vision. The part that we saw that was a fit was the Ecological Action Plan increased ecological services. There is not money that comes with that, it is examples of things that can be undertaken in a variety of areas. From a regional perspective Metro Van supports that. Supporting pollinators is a part of that. Gordon Ganong: What are the next steps in your approvals for this to go ahead? Tom: We will take comments from tonight and to the end of January and we will compile them and compile a report for the parks committee to have a look at. Our political folks make the decision. We will look through comments, meet with BAA to talk about what we heard and then map out next steps. As Tom was mentioning our key next step was to go back to the environment and parks committee. The earliest we would get back to is March. Bruce: If you get strong input would it be clear this would be a go. Metro: We are here to listen. Marian: If and when it does get created, what is the legal relationship with Metro Parks? Greg: It is very much like the memorial garden or the hatchery. They have a license agreement it is a land use agreement. Initially, probably for a year or two. With some of our longer-term community groups we have five-year agreements. It is not a lease, it is an agreement between Metro and BAA society. Identifies roles and responsibilities. Greg: Marion and Jean have both written historical accounts. Jean: The foundations were for the man who owned the cattle. The Union Steamship company built a barn there for the farm and the family. Q: There was a report submitted to the environment and parks committee is it available. A: Yes. Will Husby: This is a very different endeavor than the memorial garden in that education and interpretation 1 Regional Parks Committee 61

62 is the core of this. I would strongly suggest that they be involved in vetting this. When I was involved in designing the kiosk about the salmon we developed an interpretive plan, which had major steps about features inventory what is there. A pollination garden on a meadow will decrease pollinators. I take people there to learn about pollinators. Also audiences, who are they how will they be addressed and what are the impacts of doing that. This is something your folks have expertise in it. You need some professional assisting this volunteer group. Joyce: If our concerns are met, if concerns are addressed, and this project goes ahead, I would hope that any brochures would include a focus, including signage from the ferry all the way through the park. Greg: Yes it would be a feature of the park. Our education staff is working on QR codes and social media is being actively pursued. There are lots of opportunities for linkages. Elle: The arts council has the idea of an art walk that would lead people there similar to the bird house. Signage is super-important. Tom: Congrats on the work, you have clearly responded to the feedback. There is no way you are going to get financing with a one year lease. So you can raise the capital without raising a fortune. If there is enough support are you open to a longer lease? Greg: We use license agreements. Leasing involves subdivision of land, and registering on title and metro van is not interested. Elle: It impacts fundraising. Tim: Speaking from the Fish and Wildlife perspective. We are 100 percent volunteer organization. One of our main partners has been Metro Van parks. Metro owns the building, we own the equipment inside. We would raise between K fry which we release into Terminal Creek and the lagoon. One constraint is water. For two months of the year we have low rainfall. Killarney Creek and Terminal Creek are fantastic spawning environments. In the summer it is stressed. You can look at Carter Pond, it is a trickle. And if you walk along through the summer, any operation will be that July 15-Sept 15 period, getting enough water. On the partnership side, Metro Van is a fantastic partner. If they do decide to go ahead they 2 would be a great partner. If they decided not to they would be good reason. Andre Chollat: Is there a potential alternative somewhere else in the park. The area seems to be my main concern. I would have thought you have chosen a site in Davies Orchard. They are Alders. They will attract many pests, which are not welcome in the garden. I don t think lavender will do very well. The project itself is great but I am very concerned about your choice of location to do it. Greg: Early on in the discussion we identified a couple of sites that might be possible. BAA went away and gave it some thought and they really wanted to have something in the meadow. Elle: We did look at three other sites, the orchard, behind the baseball field. This was our favorite site and we did commission and We hired a site assessment, and have looked at other sites and it is still our favorite site. Everhard: Half of your site will be in shade. Elle: They looked at the sunlight on the existing site, the sun light is adequate for what we want to say. No it would not be bigger. Greg: There is an opportunity because of its location to enhance the pollinator. Will: The term enhancement for pollinators has me concerned. Pollinator habitat wasn t looking at the plants, the limiting factor is where they nest. What I see on the edge between the meadow and the trees, there is fallen logs and salmonberry, when you break a stem that is a nesting spot for native bees, leaf cutter bees and mason bees. I think you need to spend a little more time developing an understanding of pollinator habitat beyond plants you plant to eat or look pretty. I am quite concerned with what I am hearing. My question is, are you going to get some expert ecologists. (Absolutely) Greg: Working with Dr. Elizabeth Ellie at SFU. I am not going to come up with a planting plan. Elle: Really good point and we would talk to the experts who are interested. A focus is educating on pollinators. We will bring in the experts. Will: One final thing is in my experience you let the site tell you the things you don t choose the thing Regional Parks Committee 62

63 first. Those criteria about sunlight, water, light, habitat you are not going to destroy existing habitat that is the kind of thing that helps you decide the location. Peter Frinton: Questions about design and safeguards. Why do you need an outdoor learning center when BICS has built on that is underutilized? On the south side you have the old foundations. Why espaliered trees in the middle? Going on to constraints I look at the alders, that is an important songbird habitat. I would hate to see those as sacrificial in that the conifers have greater value. Disturbed overgrown old field while they have a lifespan maybe another 30 years that is another benefit of that area. I would want to see cutting back. I think you will lose your sun later in the day. Water has been addressed but I think there maybe are good ways to deal with that. The closest sources are the two creeks. Maybe you need a cistern to tide you through. The final thing is yes we have a budget, the community garden is 30,000. How expensive will this be? Sarah: It is a very pedestrian friendly location and it is close to schools. We can have some school groups come here to use our outdoor learning center and it is for the use of the school, this would be open to schools at all times. The simple structure would be a place to generate the catchment. A simple structure would be beneficial. Greg: On the water, that was identified early on. We know the hatchery closes down in the summertime when the creek is low. We don t think any of the creeks would be a source of water. Dave McIntosh: I worked real hard at actually growing vegetables and the other thing is promoting eating and growing locally. Vancouver is doing an excellent job. All of their bee gardens and vegetable are on municipal land or private land. Here on Bowen I have been trying hard to promote growing and eating locally. We can do this, for bees, for little critters or own our own properties. I have one other garden on a bigger piece of property and I have three more coming next spring. We have room for bees. Do we know the bee population? I happen to know at the recycling depot there are a lot of wild flowers. I am thinking that half an acre in the park, what is it going to do. I think it is too much. We can have people visit other areas of the island where there is good possibility. How much bigger can we get. We have lots of land and I am thinking why can t we leave the meadows alone? There are big flat parcels, with water. Emily: I like looking to the meadows to define themselves. I run three wilderness education programs on Bowen all I have taken to the meadows, it was an unbelievably good opportunity to show how wilderness can regenerate. Under the alder tree next to the dog park was the best place to go. It was open and secluded and be in the wilderness and not be interrupted by people and see the pollen blowing by. It was an amazing opportunity, and I don t go there but I do go exactly where you are planning this garden. That little area A pollinator garden is an urban idea, to have it in an urbanized area is a good idea. But to put it in the meadow is disastrous educationally. We would walk along the trail and right along that ditch is one of the three best areas to see wild food plants. My question is have you put so much work into this that you are reluctant to do it somewhere else. Elle: This is our favorite spot and yeah it doesn t have to be there. We are trying to make it a more beautiful space but I understand that for you that is taking away from it. It is a concept we are talking about. Joyce Ganong: There is an undercurrent I want to state the obvious. The undercurrent in the room is thank you a group of people have said what they would like to do and put an incredible amount of work into this. A lot of respectful comments and an endorsement of what you would like to see. I just want to make sure that is spoken. The comments that are being taken you are doing a good job of receiving them. This is how we are going to move forward as a community by being this way. Support for the work that is being done and being passionate about moving it forward. Q: You mentioned you love that spot. Why is it? We love it because it is a sanctuary of peace and stillness. There was a meadow where we lived it brings me back. What do we feel when we walk through the meadow, it is a spiritual thing. It speaks to the mandate of why we have parks. To have that feeling of connection to nature it connects to the stillness 3 Regional Parks Committee 63

64 within each of us. We have to preserve that and it needs to be somewhere else. John Dowler: Wrong map distributed?!? Elle: Wrong map was printed should not have handed out. Greg: A sunlight analysis was done. A number of images of that. Those reports are good background information. Q: Have any of you gone and sat on the bench in the meadows. Bowen has so much land. I am getting devastated listening to this. The meadows are irreplaceable. Once it s done it s done you can t go back. I would really like you on a sunny day to go sit on a bench by the horse ring. Comment: I would like to look at it and say the education merits of this project, in terms of using up time departing the ideal specifications to manage this project. We really have a critical timeline in the health of the bees. And we have a government that has approved pesticides that allow for the killing of millions of bees. Educating people from urban environments in a rural environment is so critical. I don t want to just keep that for myself and I want others to experience that. Comment: I am all for it but we don t need fences in the middle of the meadows. Comment: I am a trained master gardener. The movement is to not over disturb things. There is a scientific approach. We try not to go in with our ideas of beauty and order and to see what is there. This is obviously really disturbed by humans already. I agree that beneficial pollinators are threatened. I don t see where they aren t threatened would improve things. Going to another site that needs more restoration would make sense. Just because you put a plan in a place that is inappropriate. And try to make the site work. The information is there it seems that we are making. You can t teach a lesson by ignoring what the site is telling you. It is saying we can have a pollinator garden. Kim: We walked the land, we didn t have a full permaculture assessment. I am not attached to it being in the meadows. I believe in the concept and I have stared at the Davies Orchard area a lot. That wasn t what was pursued in this particular place. I am hopeful there could be some other site possibilities that could be looked at. Everhard van lithe de jude: I am looking at the meadow, now we have the horse ring, the dog off leash areas, add the three up and that is half of the meadow area. It is taken away from what used to be the meadow. Pretty soon if there is another group coming in and saying we want this other corner then it is more than half of the meadow. I don t think it s the right place. Helen: I did live in the old farmhouse. At that place where the horse meadow was the barn, there was a putting green that was leveled and pesticides. The place has changed it is changing, it is evolving, something like putting in gardens is a lovely space. WE are not going to be destroying anything. It has changed it is evolving and for me the garden sounds like a nice idea. Alison Morse: I am not a gardener. If we left it alone the whole meadow will be alders right? Greg: Yes. Sue Ellen Fast: Has the snake hibernaculum under the foundation been considered? They need that place and spread out from there in several kilometers. We don t have a lot of snake predators, lots of hawks and owls. Greg: BAA was originally looking at a small farm. Mouse and habitat. Sue Ellen: I want to reinforce that it is already a green learning ground, those of us who do lead educational excursions into the park. Also want to ring up the visitor experience aspect. Wildlife and nature viewing was the highest activity of 45 percent of the visitors, walking on the trails was another experience. Wonder if you thought about the visitor experience and how the fence and the activities would change it, and when is a meadow not a meadow. 4 Regional Parks Committee 64

65 Elle: One of the main reasons is that we love the idea of doing something ALR land which is designated as such. I would just ask you to think about that. That is why this land isn t the same as any other. Comments very heart-felt. Please don t forget you can make a comment of any kind until January 30. Close out with group rendition of Happy Birthday. End at 8:22pm 5 Regional Parks Committee 65

66 5.5 Attachment 3 Crippen Regional Park Killarney Meadows BAA s Proposed Pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden Feedback via the Metro Vancouver Information Centre icentre@metrovancouver.org The following are my thoughts concerning the pollinator demonstration garden (the Project) proposed by the Bowen Agricultural Alliance (BAA) in part of the Killarney (Crippen) Meadow area Crippen Regional Park. I am very much in favour of educational projects such as a pollinator demonstration garden. I am also a supporter and member of BAA (when I remember to pay my dues!). On first review, the proposed general location seemed like a reasonable idea. However, after much thought and careful consideration, I ve come to the realization that the proposed location in Killarney Meadow is not appropriate for the following reasons. 1. The major issue for me is the well-known presence of an important garter snake habitat site (possibly a hibernaculum) within the old dairy barn foundations at that site. For some reason, this environmentally sensitive feature of the site appears to have been overlooked by BAA and the society s advisors during the conceptual design of the pollinator demo garden project. I consider this a major flaw of the proposed Project. Although there are no written references that I know of regarding this critical reptilian habitat, it has long been known by Bowen s naturalists for at least 30 years, based on Michael Dunn s accounts from before I moved here in 1988 (Mr. Dunn, a wildlife expert and CWS staff member, was a co-founder of the Bowen Nature Club circa 1985). This critical reptilian habitat has been protected by its obscurity behind tall grasses and thistles in summer; is a sure-bet place to see beautiful snakes of all sizes in summer, and a place where the snakes can quickly hide too; and a great place to sit quietly out of the way and bask in the energy of so many reptiles and other wildlife. A demonstration garden at this site would disturb if not destroy this habitat. 2. I recognize that this meadow is not a naturally occurring type of ecosystem on Bowen Island. However, its human-created presence (and continuation through periodic mowing by MetroVan Parks) contributes to increasing biodiversity on the island. Abandoned fields are, in their own right, an important type of meadow ecosystem. The open space of the greater meadow is also an aesthetic amenity much appreciated by park users. In my view, this area is best kept as a meadow ecosystem demonstration area, a place of discovery and wonder, rather than redeveloped even if only partially for a pollinator demo garden. The meadow in its current state offers a great opportunity for interpretive education on historical meadow ecosystems, by MetroVan Parks and community groups. Indeed, the Bowen Nature Club has already conducted many nature walks in the park including the meadow area. 3. Also, I understand the conundrum posed by the opposing perspectives of historical agriculture versus nature preservation, because I support greater agricultural production on Bowen and at the same time prefer to keep any protected areas preserved in perpetuity. In this regard, I see the meadow as an agricultural land reserve to be used only in case of extreme hardship such as war or other major disaster befalling the region. As it is right now, there is ample realized or potential agricultural production on private properties. I see no need to alienate public natural parkland for this purpose. In my opinion, there is no demonstrated need for a pollinator 1 Regional Parks Committee 66

67 demonstration garden in a rural setting, much less in a natural park. Conversely, there is a need for such gardens in more urbanized settings. 4. The scale of the proposal also seems much larger than would be warranted as a simple demonstration garden. The installation of fencing and establishment of an area of restricted public access is objectionable. I feel uneasy that a pollinator demo garden in Crippen meadow could become a beach head, a smaller-scale first step, that could lead to further de-protection of the meadow in the future: today a pollinator garden, tomorrow a demo farm sort of progression, with further restriction of public access. 5. A pollinator demo garden is a great idea, just not in the Crippen meadow, and definitely on top of a garter snake refuge. There are undoubtedly many other suitable areas, including the more urbanized area of Crippen Park within Snug Cove. For that matter, multiple pollinator demo gardens could be created throughout the Bowen Island Municipality s public spaces, including for example verges on the outside edge of selected roadside ditches. In conclusion, I urge MetroVan Parks to preserve the Crippen or Killarney meadow as a semi-natural ecosystem with unrestricted public access, and give serious consideration to helping BAA find an alternative location for this proposed pollinator demonstration garden, such as in Snug Cove. Thank you for taking my views into consideration during this community consultation. I grew up on Bowen Island from the ages of 18months to 18years, and some of my fondest memories took place in the Crippen Park Meadows. I walked dogs there, met with friends, rode horses, competed in equestrian events and chaperoned preschool field trips. I learned to respect the environment, and that everything has it's place in the ecosystem. I watched it transition through the different seasons, and how it adapted to these changes. I didn't need a man-made structure to teach me how to appreciate nature, I simply walked into that clearing and experienced it. I am 27 now, and live in Vancouver. Whenever I return to Bowen Island, I make sure to visit this special place, for there is nowhere else like it. I have travelled to many parts of the world, and I have not yet found another place that makes me feel as it does. To know that everything in the ecosystem is working in harmony makes me feel at peace. Every day I face the crowded, bustling streets of Vancouver. I pass people who have their eyes glued to a screen, or rushing to get places. When I enter the Meadows, all of that congestion and stress melts away, and suddenly I am peaceful. As I move towards having children of my own, I want to know that there is somewhere I can take them to teach the importance of respecting and appreciating nature. I want them, and the many children who currently live on Bowen, to have the experience I did, for my time at the meadows enriched my life, and continues to be a source of peace and wonder for me. I am vehemently against the construction of a pollination garden in the Crippen Park Meadows. There are many other areas on the island where this could be developed that would be much more accessible and well populated. The Meadows is not currently easily accessible to the handicapped, 2 Regional Parks Committee 67

68 nor would many tourists know where this area is. A more central location, closer to Snug Cove, would be provide education and enjoyment to a much greater audience. Please protect this rare treasure, as there is nowhere else in the world like it. Thank you, I am ing you to register our family's grave concerns over the proposed location of the Bowen Island pollinator garden. We believe that, for many reasons (both aesthetic and significantly ecological) the current proposed site - the Meadow - is the wrong location. There are numerous sites more suitable on the island (specifically those closer to the ferry terminal for day-trippers, and utilising currently overlooked and under-used spaces). We therefore join a significant number of Bowen Islanders in respectfully urging you to request that the Bowen Agricultural Alliance finds a more suitable site for this wonderful - but currently ill-placed - initiative. With warm wishes, I support the idea of a pollinator garden on Bowen Island, and the initiative taken by the Bowen Agricultural Alliance ( BAA ) to create one for education and interpretative purposes. However, I oppose the location of this garden in the Killarney Meadow. I oppose the location in the Killarney Meadow because of concerns over de-pletion of native pollinator habitat. The Killarney Meadow in its current state has a broad biodiversity of plants, which already support a large number of native pollina-tors. The proposed initiative will destroy the existing native pollinator environment and replace it with an artificial native pollinator garden. This is likely to lead to fewer nesting sites for bumble bees, solitary bees and wasps, and larval food plants for butterflies, moths and beetles. Removal of the salmonberry bushes in the mead- ow will deplete both hummingbird foraging and nesting habitat. The Metro Vancouver s Ecological Health Action Plan advocates for protection of na- tive pollinator habitat. The proposed BAA plan, although very well intentioned in its goals, will unfortunately reduce this habitat. With the current active uses in the meadow the horse paddock and the off leash dog area there has already been a significant reduction in the area s natural habi- tat. Any further reduction will affect the ability of some of the birdlife to forage for seeds, berries and insects. We are also concerned about the impact this proposed garden and the consequent public traffic will have on the population of garter snakes, which are particularly abundant in the meadow. Garter snakes are important predators of slugs, insects and mice, and thus an important element in the meadow ecosystem. 3 Regional Parks Committee 68

69 Finally, the Killarney meadow is a very popular place for islanders and visitors alike, who enjoy the quiet and solitude that this place offers. The addition of a fenced garden site utilizing one third of the meadow with structures and more human activity will detract from this experience. I encourage the BAA to consider alternate locations for their proposed pollinator garden, somewhere that will not cause any damage to existing natural pollinator habitat. This is the one area on Bowen Island that brings people together in the environment. Elders and youngsters, those seeking solace or beauty arrive and "pollinate" each other in a place without fences. It is working for the birds and the bees and the people! Please find another place to do this. Respectfully, I do support the proposed location for the pollinator initiative and demo garden. I have read the comments/concerns of Will Husby which have been widely disseminated on Bowen Island, and wish to point out a number of his points which deserve further comment / consideration. WH: The biodiversity of plants here is especially important since many native pollinators have strong preferences for a narrow spectrum of host plants AP: A significant portion of Bowen Island (+80%?) is covered with native re-growth (after logging early in the 1900 s) surely this provides adequate range for truly native pollinators? WH: A broad biodiversity of plants supports a broad biodiversity of pollinators AP: Surely this is a point in support of the addition of biodiversity which the proposed garden would enhance? WH: The numerous fallen branches and tree trunks on the edges.this warm site attracts many pollinators who seek out warm dry wood or soil. AP: Bowen does suffer from a lack of fallen branches and tree trunks. Is not the reason this site has an open nature because it was cleared in the past for farming? Therefore is this habitat actually native to Bowen at all? If this sort of open space is not native to Bowen then why would using it for gardening negatively impact native pollinators? WH: The proposed plan will significantly reduce native pollinator habitat. AP: I see no proof offered to support this assertion. What % of Bowen does this tiny parcel of land represent in relation to the total island my guess 0.01%. 4 Regional Parks Committee 69

70 WH: They propose to remove existing meadow habitat (native and non-native grasses,.. AP: So this area already has non-native plants so addition of additional non-native plants will increase bio-diversity, and is not a case of introducing non-native species into a virgin habitat. WH: continuation of sentence above grasses, herbs and shrubs) and replace it with a raised bed garden that will include a selection of flowers attractive to native pollinators,. AP: Admits flowers will be attractive to NATIVE pollinators. WH: It is my professional opinion that there will be a significant net loss in pollinator habitat, especially nesting sites for bumble bees, solitary bees and wasps and larval food plants for. AP: There is no shortage of wasps on Bowen Island. A significant loss what %? Is the gain in biodiversity of plants and resulting potential gain in pollinator species included in this calculation (use term calculation loosely as no evidence or supporting numbers given). WH: The area of natural meadow habitat. AP: This was a farm this is not a natural habitat for Bowen. WH: Some of this decrease has been the result of natural succession as trees and shrubs have moved into the meadow edges from the adjacent forest Over a very long period.crippen Meadow will be absorbed by the surrounding forest. AP: Yes nature is retaking its territory. Again proving the point that this is not a natural habitat on Bowen. I would dispute the statement that it would take a very long period for the forest to re-integrate the meadow if we just leave this area be based on my observations to my backyard (on Bowen). WH: These reductions are likely to reduce the local biodiversity AP: Unsubstantiated, and counter to his own statements A broad biodiversity of plants supports a broad biodiversity of pollinators. WH: The loss of one third of existing meadow habitat will negatively affect the populations and perhaps the biodiversity of birds that are adapted to meadow habitat AP: Birds that are adapted to meadow habitat should not be on Bowen as meadow is not a natural habitat on Bowen. No evidence sited which indicates the garden will reduce number of mice/voles (would likely increase these populations in my opinion) and garden could increase seeds and berries available. IMO evidence points to this increasing the attractiveness of the meadow area for birds and perhaps increasing the biodiversity of birds. WH: the population of garter snakes on Bowen Island is high 5 Regional Parks Committee 70

71 AP: Then why the hand wringing? WH: Snakes travel long distances to gather at hibernacula There is strong evidence that the farm building foundations are used underground dens where snakes congregate AP: Native snakes do not require man-made structures around which to hibernate otherwise they would not be native to Bowen. They can just slither to the next hopefully native hibernacula. WH: This is likely to result in a significant negative impact on local garter snakes populations Disturbance of this hibernacula would decimate the local garter snake population They can be easily caught and killed by dogs and people who are afraid of snakes. AP: Existence of hibernacula has not even been confirmed. The population on Bowen is high. There are dogs and people in the park now. Will the garden increase biodiversity of dogs and people? WH: The removal of approximately one third of the remaining meadowlands.will detract from the nature experience of many who already use this site AP: Perhaps but not substantiated. Also, the new garden might substantially improve the nature experience of others. Any evidence the garden will disturb the quiet natural setting? I have to point out again that IMO the meadow is NOT a natural setting on Bowen Island. WH: The impact of garden-related fences, structures, planters and human activity is inconsistent with.. AP: Seems to be a prioritization of certain human activities over other human activities which does not seem constructive and a personal value judgment which I do not share. WH: Visitors to Crippen are an important part of Bowen s economy and quality of the visitor experience should be maintained: AP: Zero evidence given that visitors would think a garden is a negative addition to the park. More likely in my opinion to enhance use of park and attract new users. Gardening is very popular on Bowen and Bowen s garden tours are very well known in the Lower Mainland. This garden might be added to the tour and introduce an entire new demographic to Crippen. WH: One of the insects common here are forest tent caterpillars. AP: 0.1% of Bowen Islanders are worried that the garden will reduce the scourge of tent caterpillars on Bowen Island. Since this is a pollinator garden I have 100% confidence that BAA will not use pesticides that kill pollinators. Plus, could be a good demonstration put on of how to deal with caterpillars without use of pesticides which could reduce pesticide use on Bowen Island and result in significant increase in biodiversity on Bowen including native pollinators, birds and garter snakes. WH: Regular vandalism will increase maintenance costs and may require regular evening patrols by Metro Vancouver Parks staff or RCMP. 6 Regional Parks Committee 71

72 AP: Unsubstantiated fear mongering. WH: Alternative Locations..other sites in Crippen Park or on private lands would be a better option, especially on sites that already are disturbed and lack pollinator habitat? AP: I personally don t like any of the other suggested sites. The proposed site is already disturbed in that the land is only clear because it was put in that state to act as a garden and if we stopped cutting back the alder it would quickly revert to what is natural on Bowen forest. I hope Metro Vancouver will honor the history of Bowen Island by agreeing to allow BAA to restore a very small part of one of the few historic farms on Bowen Island. Thank-you. I am writing to to express my support for the Pollinator Garden in Crippen Park on Bowen Island. I think it would make an excellent educational contribution to the island. The park offers many natural adventures both for the tourist and the locals but at present there are few educational aspects to the park beyond the salmon signs at the Causeway and the fish hatchery. I think that the meadow is a great location as noted by BAA, being walking distance from the ferry as well as many of the schools. As a learning experience it would be wonderful to have the garden demonstrate the many aspects of a pollinator garden with signage, gardens and people on hand to give talks. The main opposition to the Pollinator Garden seems to be in the location and not of the idea itself. For some the meadow is a place of quiet and natural habitat. I live close to the meadow and go there for my daily walks but rarely do I find that I am alone. It is a busy place with the dog park, the horse ring and an area for kids to play ball or throw a disc. It is flat and many people are cycling. So why the opposition to an already busy place? The meadow has a history of agriculture. Bowen is a big island. There are many places on Bowen for native pollinators to go. The area for the garden in the meadow is just a small spot in the scheme of things. I give a thumbs up to the garden, and thank the BAA for all the research work that went in to taking the idea this far. I am a citizen, educator and resident of Bowen Island and have been for 20 years. I strongly oppose the development of anything in the land known as "the meadows on Bowen. This land is a natural and open space - we already have community gardens (recently built with an educational component for the greater community) at our Community School on Bowen Island. These lands in the meadow should be left wi;d and untouched, they are enjoyed and have been for years by all residents and to have them designated as a place for activity and a small farm and teaching garden here would entirely spoil the natural quiet beauty that we now have. 7 Regional Parks Committee 72

73 PLEASE do not allow this project to move forward as it is not needed and detrimental to our island. Thank you The proposal of a pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden is a commendable goal of the BAA to be encouraged. However the choice of the Killarney Meadows area of Crippen Regional Park to establish that project of a garden raises some doubts about the reflexion of such an initiative by its proponents for the following reasons: 1. The Killarney Meadows Area varies considerably from extremely wet in winter to very dry in late summer. Its agricultural history as a farm was a dairy barn for a few cows given the grass potential of that wetland and not a food production garden for humans, which then occupied a large part of Deep Bay. 2. A pollinator and demonstration Garden ought to be established in the vicinity of flowering trees, preferably fruit trees, like the Davie s orchard of Snug Cove. A production garden in the meadows will attract insects from the surrounding Alders Forest (Ants and Termites, Aphids and Weevils and various voracious caterpillars and beetles) not welcomed in a vegetable patch! 3. Water is essential to the production and survival of a vegetable garden. It may be different with some types of ornamentals particularly with the new technics of Xeriscaping and the use of semi tropical plants. A quick calculation of the water need for a 200ft vegetable garden in raised beds is an average of 40 gal a day (or 8 pails of 5 gal each for 5 beds of 4 X10 ) to succeed with the production of most current vegetables. The dry season now on BOWEN ISLAND is of 6 to 10 weeks between July and October (most often in August and September). With the need of 40 gal a day for 42 to 70 days, the garden requires a total of gal to gal. In the dry season that amount of water taken out of Terminal Creek will endanger trout s, salmon s and other creature s survival. The drilling of a well in that location may also affect the ecology of the surrounding area. 4. A demonstration Garden in the Killarney Meadows will necessitate some protection from the Deer, the Squirrels, the Raven and the Crows and perhaps now the Raccoons and Skunks, and an infrastructure of Fencing and Gates, Shelters for the protection of garden tools and teaching equipment, bee shelters and Washrooms for the participants. The relative isolated situation of that location of Killarney Meadows may also require the demonstration garden to be protected from potential damage of vandalism when the recycling depot is not in operation and the equestrian ring not often used. For all those reasons it would be wise to reconsider the location of that initiative. The Davies Orchard would provide all the conditions required: access to water, existing cottage as amenities and a perfect location for Bowen Islanders and Tourists all year round. It would also be within the historical context of the area where there was some vegetable and ornamental gardens around the cottages. It would add to the heritage garden production of the Bowen Island Heritage Preservation Association. 8 Regional Parks Committee 73

74 With the hope that those comments will assist the decision making process Thank you for last night information session. BAA did not go the BI museum and Archive file of the Union Steamship. The archive has a map showing the different uses of the Union steamship properties. The garden growing vegetables for the hotel were at what is now the catholic church eastward. The barn shown was on Lenora rd, nowhere near the Meadows. With all the respect I have for Dr Neil BOYD, I find disappointing his manipulative decision regarding the Pollinator Initiative in Crippen Park, to refer copies of the proposal to faculty colleagues at Simon Fraser University, Dr WINSTON, an expert in pollination and Dr Gail ANDERSON, a forensic entomologist. In doing so Dr Boyd may want to prove that there academic expertise are of greater importance than the overwhelming reject of the project in that area by a majority of Bowen Islanders. The named academics responded according to the knowledge of the science, but they do not know the area and they have not mastered the cumulative reasons by many to reject such a project in the meadows of Crippen Park. Those many reasons were provided to Metro Vancouver and were well received To try and forcefully impose the BAA expectations of such a project to the community by the means of the professional comments of reputed Academics and by degrading as self-described local experts the local people involved who have a down to earth understanding of that area, a rather biased use of fair play and of the democratic process. Some years ago, it is such understanding and informed data recording of the natural habitat by local islanders that helped Dr Anderson in her research of a forensic case on Bowen Island. To Heather PRITTIES statement that the same people that oppose the Pollination Garden in the Meadows had opposed the school soccer field. This is not true as we were strong proponents of that project and pleased to see it completed. Finally to Michelle PENTZ-GLAVE submission, we are very much in favour to see the Pollinator Initiative be developed in the alternative area of the Bowfest field and the Davies Orchard area, which would make that project acceptable to all and very successful. The Meadows are the most beautiful part of Crippen Park, and there is already a healthy, pollinating ecosystem thriving there. Rather than allow some members of a small group to dig a quarter of it up and damage the biological balance in the remainder in the process, wouldn't it be better to have local experts help visitors interpret what Mother Nature is already doing in The Meadows? If this group wants to create a man-made garden, it would be better in Snug Cove, where there is water for irrigation, and many more people would see it. That way, visitors to Crippen Park could have the best of both worlds. 9 Regional Parks Committee 74

75 I say Yes to the Pollinator garden. As a frequent user of Crippen Park for the past 25 years, I have seen Our Park frequently face external and internal threats. I use the term Our Park in a fully inclusive way, in that our park belongs to everyone and not to special interest groups who propose developments or activities that damage the environment or exclude other natural and human uses. Sometimes proposals are made in ignorance, other times proponents should know better. Threats Crippen Park has faced in the past, and lost, include industrialization by a previous gravel storage pit now the recycling depot location, vehicle storage for BC Hydro and likely associated subsurface and groundwater contamination, encroachment on its margins by extra wide shoulders along roadways and parking areas, the fenced meadow dog area, and removal of valuable lands just by calling them surplus. Some developments are extremely beneficial, if located and operated correctly. One obvious example is the fish hatchery. Undoubtedly, Metro/GVRD Park staff and managers will have a much longer list of threats to Crippen Park. Metro/GVRD Park managers need to be fully vigilant in protecting our park for natural and human uses. Briefly, my concerns regarding this specific proposal include: The meadow is currently a healthy functioning native pollinator habitat, and it needs no assistance from this proposal. Professional science authorities inform that the proposal plan will actually significantly reduce native pollinator habitat. So why proceed? The physical footprint of the proposal will significantly reduce natural meadow habitat, and lead to increased fragmentation. Other than pollinators, the meadow is used by many species of wildlife including red-tail hawks. The proposal will adversely impact these natural uses. Some of the area is significantly used by garter snakes, which would be forced to move with this proposal Move where? The proposal will harm visitor experience and conflicts with existing education uses A proposal of this size should have had conducted an appropriately detailed environmental review. I could find no reference to such a review. For all these reasons, Metro Vancouver / GVRD must deny this proposal I am writing to express concern with the location in the existing meadow area of Crippen Regional Park as a potential site for the Bowen Agricultural Alliance s proposed Demonstration Pollinating Garden. All of the material distributed indicates that their proposal would involve covering or destruction of the existing meadow ground cover, fencing of the area, construction of one or more shelters and storage buildings, and raised planter beds above the existing grade. 10 Regional Parks Committee 75

76 The meadow area has already been permitted to be intruded upon by the horse ring and a fenced dog-off-leash area. The remaining meadow is old-field growth of mostly native grassland habitat, with a wide variety of resident and migratory insects and birds taking advantage of the pollinating plants that already exist in this habitat. This area is well enjoyed by many pedestrians, dog-walkers, cyclists and some equestrians using the well-established trail that bisects the meadow area and connects to the entire Crippen Park trail system an several directions. Metro Parks staff do an excellent job of maintaining these trails for the ongoing enjoyment of residents and visitors to Bowen Island. As this are is within walking distance of the ferry terminal and Snug Cove. I would suggest that the Davies Heritage Orchard, also part of Crippen Regional Park, might provide a better location for a demonstration pollinator garden. Volunteers with the Bowen island Heritage Preservation Association (Heritage Bowen) have worked for many years to restore the cottages, prune and care for as well as underplant heritage apple and other fruit species. Most recently, the Weed Warriors group with the Bowen Island Conservancy have worked with Metro Parks staff over the past three years to replant native shrub vegetation on the banks below Davies Heritage Orchard and leading to Davies Creek, as well as weekend weeding and care of the plantings to remove invasive species since planting. There are turfgrass areas behind and between the existing cottages that could be improved to include raised beds for a demonstration pollinator garden, in co-operation with Metro Parks and Heritage Bowen. There is municipal water available at the site, and Davies Heritage Orchard is in close proximity to Snug Cove and the ferry terminal. Metro Parks staff have already provided attractive interpretive signage and rustic fencing in this location, and these could be added to in the same form and style. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. Like anything on Bowen. Will have lots of participation for the first two years and then the novelty will wear off and GVRD will have to clean it up. Just like the bike park that the municipality had to clean up. I strongly oppose the proposed location of the Pollinator Project in Killarney Meadows Bowen Island. I would support such a project in a different location namely around the Metro Vancouver Orchard cottages in Snug Cove. I think as most people live in houses, a pollinator project that showcases how to produce beneficial biological results would be best suited situated in an area with dwellings. People are more apt to be able to apply the demonstrated ideas to their own homes if the project mimics the setting in which most folk live. In addition the cottage area is situated close to schools and to the "gateway" of our Island. The historical uses of the meadow area is very interesting but the fact of the matter is this area now supports amazing biodiversity and edge habitat for a diverse array of species (reptile to raptor; amphibian to numerous small mammals). As comparable or similar habitats are being developed on Bowen, the meadow's biosignificance has been amplified. The area also is sited within a wetland 11 Regional Parks Committee 76

77 complex which, upon introduction of nutrients from agricultural activity could have far reaching detrimental effects. I would like to have my opinion considered when making a decision concerning the Proposal for a Pollinator Garden in Crippen Park on Bowen Island. While I support the idea and respect all the time and effort gone into the idea I DO NOT SUPPORT the chosen location. I believe in this case the meadow should be left in tact to flourish in its uniqueness and not exploited for that 'uniqueness.' I attended the information meeting on Bowen and was impressed with the alternative ideas presented as to its location, especially the Davies Orchard in Snug Cove as a possible alternative. Access, water availability and the fact that it is an 'orchard' makes it seem like a very viable location. I am sure there are other suitable ideas but that one stands out for me. I appreciate being able to register my thoughts with you, thank you. Regarding Bowen's proposed pollinator garden, I like the idea, but I think that the location, in the meadows, is misplaced. If this is to be an education opportunity, as the proponents suggest, it would far easier achieve its purpose by being located closer to most of the foot traffic in The Cove, namely, Davies Orchard. I support the BAA proposal in the meadow on Bowen I fully support this and think it is awesome that Bowen Island can become a haven for bees. Comment Form 1. Comments on BAA s Proposed Pollinator Initiative and Demonstration Garden? As a 72 year resident (2nd home) of the island, with family roots dating back to the mid 1920 s, I believe this is an excellent use of this small portion of the former Terminal Farm site. It is a benign, environmentally friendly use which very much complements the adjacent uses. I believe the Bowen Agricultural Alliance has done a good job in researching the use and choosing the site. The demonstration garden would be of great interest to school children, tourists and the community-atlarge. I would encourage Metro Vancouver Parks endorse the initiative as the BAA volunteer effort has been exceptional, sustained for some 3-4 years and is generally supported by a large constituency in the community as evidenced by the excellent, full house attendance at the December 9, 2014 Community Information Meeting. 2. Comments on the proposed location of the Demonstration Garden in Killarney Meadows? The location appears to have been chosen after considerable research and notwithstanding some logistical challenges is located in a good location both from an operations and a convenience 12 Regional Parks Committee 77

78 perspective. As to the latter, access is important for the success of this type of educational amenity. The site is within easy walking distance of the ferry, is centrally located for islanders and is in easy walking distance of the Bowen Island Community School, Island Pacific School, and the proposed Community Centre on the recently rezoned BIM Lot What kinds of information & programming could BAA offer that would be interesting & useful to you? The general concept promotional information is most helpful which on completion of construction, I am sure would be regularly updated to reflect the introduction of new additions to the garden. The proposed interpretive signage would support the educational aspect and allow patrons to observe, learn and understand what the garden had to offer. I would expect demonstrations and interactive workshops would provide a better understanding of nature. 4. How might you anticipate using the Demonstration Garden? While old timers, my wife and I are not beyond learning more about the birds and the bees. As we are regular users of the trails in the subject area we would drop by the gardens both on our own, with our grandchildren (9 & 7 years) and friends who visit regularly. 5. Other Comments? A wholesome, volunteer effort of this nature, which I understand to be self-funded, deserves the full support of Metro Vancouver Parks. This is an ideal use for the small 0.7-acre agricultural site. In that the Island was in the Terminal Farms/Union Steamship Days, considered to be the Happy Isle and Evergreen Playground, and now considers itself, an environmental retreat and an island of nature and natural beauty, what more needs to be said. Let the pollination and education begin. I am writing on behalf of the Bowen Island Arts Council (BIAC). Our organization has been identified as supporting the BAA's Pollinator Garden Initiative on Bowen Island. Please be advised that BIAC neither supports nor opposes the BAA initiative. Our stance is neutral. The initiative is not one that we feel relates to the mission and values of our organization and as a result, we are not involved. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Hi...I wanted to add my name to what I hope is a long list of people supporting the initiative of the Bowen Agricultural Alliance to partner with Metro Vancouver Parks to build and maintain a pollinator garden. I have been a Bowen Island resident since 2001, and I really appreciate the various initiatives Metro Parks and BAA have made, to help us understand more about this marvellous place we live in. Thanks. What a great idea just not the best location in my opinion. I believe water will be a huge issue in this area as the small creek that runs behind there is seasonal with little or no water from June to often October. It could be a huge fire issue as well when we do not have rain over the summer months as it becomes very dry and there is more traffic though this area. 13 Regional Parks Committee 78

79 As well, I would expect you will need to put up deer fencing as the meadows area is rampant with beautiful wildlife, especially deer. It would be quite unpleasant to be walking through nature and come to an 8 high wire fence - totally defeats the purpose of that park. My suggestion would be to put it closer to the cove - behind the ball diamond (upper Bowfest Field) where more could enjoy due to accessibility. Water could be more easily piped in for irrigation if required. Thank you for the consideration Following the public meeting at BICS, and after walking the Crippen park meadow over time while thinking about the project, here are my comments: It's an interesting and worthwhile idea. I strongly recommend locating the pollinator garden in Davies Orchard in Snug Cove for the following reasons: -it's heritage agricultural land and has existing interpretive signage - the land is already cleared (no thistles, horsetail, encroaching alder or field voles) -there is good perimeter road access for building and ongoing maintenance -easy to fence -water is already available -less set up and maintenance cost, easier for work crews and volunteers in all seasons -adjacent to ferry, ideal access for off island groups, both students and individual visitors as well as locals -short walk for BICS, IPS, IDS students and Children's Centre outings -longer tours could include a walk in Crippen Park to see pollinators at work in a wilder setting -draw more people to the Heritage Orchard, continue the work begun there in planting and education, help in revitalizing the cove. How to explain the enormous gift of the meadows and Killarney Lake in all weather and seasons. When the GVRD first acquired the park, Rick Hankin said how nice it was that so little was required other than improving a few basic trails, especially around the lake, and adding minimal signage. Many of us still agree with that original vision. Thank you for the opportunity to give my view. Hello again just to clarify. When I sent my comments yesterday on the pollinator garden project I was simply trying to comply with your deadline from the public meeting. I was unaware there was any group action or petition until reading Michelle's letter today online. My response is based on farming and gardening in this area for 44 years (Farm, 10 acres, also ALR and heritage) and walking in the meadow most days. Several years before Crippen became a park, I was one of a few original reps asked to voluntarily work for the community to obtain the land for a regional park. (Bowen Island Park and Store use Society.) Which took some years. That's why the fond remembrance of working with Rick Hankin. 14 Regional Parks Committee 79

80 I am a gardener and I live on beautiful Bowen Island, by the side of killarney lake and have brought my children up playing in the meadow, and while I and many others, have nothing against the concept of a pollinator garden, it would be far better suited to Snug Cove, where there would be a water supply, electricity, and it could be experienced by far more people. That way, people would get the best of both worlds: a mediated educational experience in the village centre, and the opportunity to see an undisturbed ecosystem in the Meadows. Please do not spoil such a beautiful space. I am not in support of the proposed location of this garden for the following reasons: The meadows are serene, no visible fences (the ring has been there for a long time). The area is flat, (for strollers and old people) and sunny. The visual view as you come out from the hatchery trail is alders, grass, meadow, and mountains. Every time that I walk this trail, there is someone taking a photo of this view, yesterday it was 2 young teen age boys, discussing their photos taken on their iphone. The meadow leads to the new beaver marsh, a new opportunity for visitor interpretation of a changing natural landscape. The meadow long grasses support lovely wildflowers, and mice, my photographs show the various flowers, including thistle, which are all natural pollinators. The red tailed hawk enjoys the meadow, and is seen daily. Visitors from the city can enjoy a pollinator garden at Burrard and Davie for example. They cannot see any of the above in the city. The pollinator garden in Victoria has honey bees, right downtown at the Empress Hotel. So, I am not against a pollinator garden, but Please, move it somewhere else on Bowen. We do not need a demo garden in this very special place. Why not the orchard cottage area? The orchard needs gardens, renovations and is an entrance to the cove. Also, I am at a loss as to the omission of honey bees to the plan. It seems that this is not a complete plan, one vital half is missing. I am in full support of the proposed project. Education in regards to pollinators of food systems is vital. I feel you cannot care or respect something if you do not know it. I am an organic food grower here on Bowen Island for 40 years, I an excited to see this initiative move forward, understanding food systems is number one. I look forward in helping this go forward on the ground. I attended the presentation Tuesday evening on the pollinator garden proposal. I did recently a response with my full support. I found many people s comments food for thought, I especially identified with that the meadow is constantly changing, once part was a putting green, it was larger now alders are making their way in, horse ring, etc. I feel at this time in the world food sustainability and pollination is extremely important in our world. I feel the location does work. I feel it could be 15 Regional Parks Committee 80

81 moved back a bit into the mowed/ picnic meadow part, also that it be place feet back from the path and the natural existing meadow stay intact. On another location in the meadow the dog park I would have liked to see it place not in the center of the field but back and narrow and the land around it no mowed and encourage natural vegetation to fill in. This part of the meadow could very well encompass the garden as well, with some reorganizing. many thank for your time I am writing to send my comments on the Proposed Pollinator Initiative and Demo Garden on Bowen Island. I do not support the location of the Demo Garden at Killarney Meadows. Our family has lived on Bowen Island since We live only a few minutes away so the Meadow has been a regular walk and play area throughout our life on Bowen. As a young mother I walked with my baby and husband there and met with friends, for picnics and birthdays. Then later the public school had many walk and play days that I remember with such fondness for the children had such a wide open area to fully enjoy. The natural beauty of the Meadow is unsurpassed. It is one of the few natural open unstructured spaces left on the island that is available to the public and accessible to one and all at every stage of their lives. I believe that for persons living on Bowen and those visitors from off island, the Meadow best serves the public in its present natural state and that the demonstration garden and fencing would change the flexibility to use the space, and impact both the existing habitat and beautiful vista that is now present. While I support and applaud the BAA initiative I do not support the location of the Demo Garden at Killarney Meadows. I think the idea of an educational component to the meadow experience for both visitors, students and Islanders. And I am expecting it will be a very attractive beautiful space to sit and enjoy. I wouldn't call this area wilderness given that there is a horse area, and dog field, this seems to fit in with using this area as a place to visit and use. I don't know a lot about the pollinators but I assume that the Bowen Agricultural Alliance have done their homework and have determined that this would be a good thing for bees on Bowen. I am completely in favour of having something else to see, enjoy and learn about on Bowen. Your plan to construct a garden in the meadow on Bowen Island is a great idea except for the location. There are other locations on Bowen Island much better suited for such an endeavour. I am vehemently against the construction of such a garden in the Meadows. Thank you for your time. 16 Regional Parks Committee 81

82 Just want to voice my support for this project on Bowen Island. Generally I think it is a great idea. I know there is some opposition and I have one suggestion. The area that is now fenced off and used as a dog run, could be re-purposed and used as the garden area. The dog run is almost never used as such, so there would be no loss. And this area is tucked out of the way, and is far less prominent in the meadow. The pollinator garden in this area would be far more acceptable to those who want no change to the look and use of the meadow. I understand that you are considering developing a fenced and locked pollinator garden in Crippen Park, in the meadows area near the horse paddock. I am generally opposed to the approach you seem to be taking to Crippen. For example: 1. The fenced-in, off leash meadow was deeply disappointing. The entire park functions as an offleash area, in case you didn t know. What you did simply turned a general use meadow into a single use meadow, to no-one s advantage. It downgraded the meadow from a natural space anyone could use, to a fenced space only dog walkers could use. 2. Interfering with beaver activity. Beavers are actively trying to improve the habitat in that area, and have accomplished quite a lot, resulting in increasing density of wetland life, including mink, otters, ducks, and crayfish. Yet your workers are not only demolishing damworks, but even placing a long pipe to function as a culvert to make the creek impossible to dam. The labour would have been better placed in building up the trails, if flooding was an issue. I am not opposed to the placement of a pollinator garden' per se in Crippen Park, but I do not support the establishment of a further fenced-in space, and I do not approve the creation of a facility in the meadows from which the public will be excluded except at the pleasure of a private society. If space in Crippen is to be developed, that space should be open to the public at all times. Thank you for your open house on Bowen back in December please read my letter attached. We moved here to Bowen Island 29.5 years ago. When we first came here we heard about Crippen Park. We met so many people who worked very hard to help the Park happen. I would like to take this opportunity to thank Mr. Crippen and all the hard working people and the GVRD for helping create Crippen Regional Park. In relation to the current proposal involving a bee apiary and garden in the park in the Meadows I am totally opposed to both that and other uses and desires of others for park opportunities. Let s keep the Park in its natural state for the use of the public to walk, meander and admire the birds, bees and local critters. Many years ago our family and other families would go owling in the meadows at night and we would walk the park by day. 17 Regional Parks Committee 82

83 30 years ago Crippen Regional Park was Bowen Island s most precious gift; over the next 30 years if protected as a Regional Park it will become even more precious. In terms of a garden or bee apiary etc Bowen Island has many opportunities to grow vegetables, cultivate gardens and there are many bee keepers on the Island. Opportunities for people who want to have nice large gardens are available on Municipally owned land and or private property.i personally have 2 gardens and will be developing 2 other gardens with people here from Bowen Island because we believe that growing and eating locally as much as possible is extremely important. The folks that are in favour of the garden in the park are more than welcome to join us and take part in one or two of the 20 sites that I have identified and have approval to proceed with a garden on Municipal or privately owned land that are accessible, sunny, flat and have water. Please protect Crippen Regional Park for the future. I believe this great project will be derailed by a very vocal minority. Opponents to the garden have taken to a public web forum where the issue has been distorted while at the same time inciting an emotional response to what is a community minded proposal. The more people who can learn about gardening and good agricultural practices the better off everyone will be. Tucking this garden in a low pedestrian traffic corner (as the opponents are calling for) where people cannot see and experience a demonstration garden is counter to the whole idea. The Meadow is not a pristine environment. It was used for agriculture for many years. A demonstration garden will enhance the meadow, and provide a valuable community amenity. Please do not be swayed by opponents who speak as if they have the whole island on their side. Greetings, I am writing to object to the installation of any structure in the meadows in Crippen Park.... the humbug from BAA reveals that it really doesn't serve anyone's interest except their myopic vision of some sort of education center. Claims that it will enhance the meadow and honor agricultural history is just obvious spin. Also, I see no mention of the possibility of disturbing the remains and artifacts of the Chinese farm workers. It is not "already" a destination except for the few that go there because nothing much is happening or to pick berries. Correspondence from their leader... " won't impact on endangered species"/well what a surprise, that" it's only.07 of an acre"(it's going to be small so why not let us put a building there anyway) and "hopefully the silent majority" ( phrase made famous by dishonored Richard Nixon) "and not the vocal few will be heard" reveals desperation rather than confidence. As a regional park founder, I don't carry the big stick like on other issues pertaining to the park and store... Marion Moore, Will Husby and others speak with more authority on this one. 18 Regional Parks Committee 83

84 Putting a building there and forgive me for saying so, that few will visit and soon even less will care about, will only take away from the future enjoyment of this unique part of Crippen. Surely there are less intrusive ways to educate us on the importance of pollination... how about a walk and a talk program??" My 2 cents worth...no change required. Please note that my husband and I are in full support of the BAA and Metro Vancouver proposal to situate a pollinator garden within the Killarney Meadows in Crippen Park. While we understand that some residents wish to relocate this proposed garden, we are confident in the abilities of these two organizations to determine the best use location for such an endeavor, and we therefore support the location as currently proposed. Hello, I think the bee pollinator garden is an excellent idea, but do not support its being built in the Meadows.. The Orchard by the pink cabins in Snug Cove would be a better choice perhaps. Thank you, I have been a resident of Bowen Island for 18 years. I would like to oppose the proposal for a pollinator garden to be established in Killarney Meadows in Crippen Park on Bowen Island. I am not opposed to the creation of the garden but I am opposed to locating it in Killarney Meadows. This area is used, mainly by residents, as a quiet area to walk. The area proposed for the garden is in the middle of the meadow and I feel it would greatly diminish the look and feel of the area. I walk there a couple of times a week with my dogs and enjoy the open space and the ability to walk through the meadow. I don't feel it is appropriate to disturb this area. There are few "visitors" to this area, mostly locals, and I feel an area closer to the ferry or the school would be more appropriate and would be seen by more people. There are areas around both locations that could use some "sprucing up" and this could be helpful in doing that. Please consider the feelings of the people who use this area now and don't want to see it disturbed. This is an absolute no for any change to the meadows on Bowen Island We are writing to you to express our concern regarding the proposed pollinator garden for the Crippen Park Meadows. In our opinion, this is a commendable idea in the wrong location on Bowen Island. A few of our reasons for this follow: Native pollinators will be displaced by the clearing and development of a demonstration garden. These plants are already in place and provide valuable ecosystem services. Why displace them? If the intent is to educate about the importance of pollinators, why not put information kiosks 19 Regional Parks Committee 84

85 about native pollinators in the area? There is no need to erect a demonstration garden for this function it is already there! Displacement of the garter snake hibernaculum under the old foundation. One of the reasons many local garter snakes use this space to overwinter and breed because of its location sunny, out of the way, and warm. If a demonstration garden is in the immediate vicinity this will make this a less desirable location for the hibernaculum and negatively impact our native snake population. As well, this area is prime habitat for native rodents who provide food for rapture populations. Who amongst us hasn t enjoyed the site of an eagle or hawk soaring over the meadows in search of food? The visual impact of a large area with a tall fence to keep deer and other animals out of the garden will have negative impact on the visitor experience in the meadows. The fencing and other infrastructure is inconsistent with the reason why many people enjoy walking in the meadows to experience the open space which is ideal for wildlife viewing and other simple pleasures. The current discussion about the meadows reminds us of another proposal for the meadows (and surrounding area) in Crippen Park (around 1990): that of putting the Bowen Island Golf course there. The Golf Course is now a much loved Bowen Island institution that found its home near Seymour Bay. It didn t belong in the Crippen Park meadows and neither does the proposed pollinator demonstration garden. Please find another location for the garden purposes and respect the existing uses of the meadows by leaving that space as it is for all to enjoy. If Metro approached the local school on Bowen Island and suggested building a pollinator demonstration patch somewhere in their sports-field we all know exactly what the response would be. It would be a resounding no! This area is being used on a daily basis by children and adults alike. It astounds me that the current use of the meadow is not seen in the same light, children and adults are there seven days a week, absorbing the energy of the grass and trees, it is as important to their health and happiness as eating and breathing. To interfere with this part of the lives of 4000 islanders, twice that in summer, is an imposition of unheard of proportion, and the location needs to be immediately changed. If one considers the space as important to the well being of the island inhabitants then how is it possible to even make the first drawings of a mini-farm that would crush the spirit of a significant part of the meadow, the concept borders on the absurd in a society which we assumed was sensitive to the environment. Imagine for a moment if you will, tearing up a large piece of the picnic grounds in Stanley Park, or perhaps half the cricket pitch, or maybe that stretch of grass along the water on Georgia. Imagine the response of the people if that land was ripped away from them, where they walk every day, where they take their children in strollers, where seniors spend large parts of their day. Surely it's obvious that the meadow functions in the same way, it is a part of our lives on Bowen, it is not a superfluous piece of dirt, waiting to be chewed up and fenced in to demonstrate how bees 20 Regional Parks Committee 85

86 pollinate. All the gazebos and benches and fountains (all urban devices) can't change the ugliness of a huge wire fence which would dominate the area, not to mention the man-made structures intended to 'pretty up' the mud. This idea must never be realized in the meadow on Bowen Island. No to the demonstration garden in the Bowen Island meadows I lived on Bowen for over twenty years and feel that the meadows should not be tampered with and left as a natural area. Once it is gone it will never be able to be replaced. Great idea! Perfect spot that will be appreciated for years. Don t let the whiners dissuade you. I support a far more all-encompassing direction towards real open dialogue and information sharing of any proposals that impact ALL Bowen Island residents, as well as visitors, and tourists alike. I understand, from a letter printed in our local paper, The Undercurrent, of January 23, 2015, that the Bowen Island Alliance (BAA) has been negotiating with Metro Vancouver Parks for 5 years! I find that extraordinary since BAA have not, as far as I know, been authorized as a municipal committee to engage in such negotiations on behalf of the municipality of Bowen. This pollinator garden proposal has so recently been brought to the attention of the community of all Bowen Island that it is strange that Metro has not recognized the need for the wider community to be consulted before intimating to BAA that the Board is about to collaborate by approving their proposal following the January 31 st deadline for further input. The appreciation of thousands of visitors and tourists who speak in awe of our standing green environment - our presently existing and fairly well-preserved natural environment and come to Bowen because of it - also needs to have been taken seriously into consideration and with whole island thoughts welcomed. When deciding on new and potentially beneficial, or not, projects, envisioned by any islanders, I suggest that the Metro Park planners committee help and encourage them to embrace the WHOLE community for opinions and expertise prior to presenting to Metro. Also, many times, misunderstandings, and dissention are created when whole community engagement is not encouraged early on in any proposal. There is such a simple way to prevent that from occurring, that I marvel over the propensity for clandestine planning as opposed to open and enthusiastic promotion and invitation for involving as many community members as can be reached. Accommodating all interested Islanders, not just particular groups, over a reasonable period of time might be a more productive approach, and hopefully will soon become the norm. 21 Regional Parks Committee 86

87 As many opportunities as possible for dialogue and exchange of helpful information would serve the community far better than one public meeting, as the December 9 th, 2014 one that was set during the very busy pre-holiday season. Encouraging community participation from the start might dramatically lessen the development of sides being formed, or for that angry or sarcastic tone that often develops, and in this case has developed to the point of becoming more of a deliberate exercise in one-upmanship in rhetorical debate rather than for any real interest in supporting an initiative that may very well have merit. When adequate opportunity for educated involvement is not provided, there is definitely that sense of being railroaded, or bullied into accepting the brainchild of one or a few because all residents have not had time to consider the idea, get educated, and give input from the outset. Additionally concerning is when local long-standing residents, who are well recognized and appreciated for their environmental expertise, are not consulted. That courtesy seems such an obvious and respectful one to observe. Until we truly get our act together, as a species, in understanding much more completely how the balance of nature works I advocate on the side of respectful dialogue and adequately studied and presented research, not only in regard to possible environmental analysis of costs, immediate and ongoing, but also the financial consequences of on-going maintenance, and/or the very real possibility of having to dismantle and try to replace the more natural state whose benefits may not be immediately obvious to all at present. As another voice in supporting the existing open and natural-looking meadows, I urge Metro Parks to advise Bowen to take more study time on this subject. I am also advocating for discussion of a variety of possible alternative locations perhaps some philanthropist s private land - while considering all positives and/or negatives of each suggestion in addition to the one being proposed. I also believe that all existing treed and natural park lands including the community lands, need to be protected and preserved. I would like to add my voice to the petition against the proposed pollinator garden in Crippen Park Meadow. Please help us preserve our park in its current state and halt further development there. Specifically the current proposal for a pollinator demonstration garden needs to find an alternative home outside of the park. I have already commented once on this, very briefly. Now as the deadline approaches I would like to add the following, The Bowen Agricultural Alliance missed one very important stakeholder group in their process: the general public of Bowen Island who use and enjoy the park and meadow as a natural and peaceful environment, evolving as a protected ecosystem with minimum human impact. 22 Regional Parks Committee 87

88 Of course stakeholder groups with agricultural and agricultural education focus would show excitement and support for this project. The IDEA of a demo garden was well supported I supported it too.but the site decision was not taken back to the original stakeholder groups for comment. If it has been, and if it had been put out to the general community, I think the feedback would have been different. Please understand that there is not opposition to Bowen creating a demonstration garden at all: the opposition is to the development of the Meadow in Crippen Park. I have walked the site (I walk the park regularly), contemplated the potential change, imagined the fencing, the tree removal, the movement of materials and people from the road to the site, the infrastructure and labour required, the proposed size of the project. I come up with this: The proposed garden is too big. It is not a demo pollinator garden, it is a full on market size food production garden. With that size, the emphasis is on demo food production, not pollinators. As such, it will require bed maintenance, water, soil amendments, tools, path maintenance, deer proofing etc. It is not a gentle intrusion into the park. All of that will come in from the road along the gravel trail, through the entrance to the meadow, across the existing grass area to the garden site. The impact and use of space is MUCH BIGGER than just the garden site. The peace and tranquility of the meadow will be replaced by human activity and human infrastructure not in service of protecting natural space. To me this is a direct disconnect from the purpose of creating park protection and management for natural spaces. Lots of initiatives would see park space as ideal for their applications: but parks are not on the table as developable lands. Just because the park has an agricultural history (80 years ago) does not mean it should be on the table as agricultural land now. We have moved on. It is now a park for many solid reasons and has been a park for a long time! It is not as if there are no other possible locations. There are other possibilities for this initiative if it is truly trying to be a demonstration pollinator garden and educational space. It does not have to be inside the park. It does not have to be so big. It does not have to be all one continuous space. Working in the cove with raised bed gardens around the heritage cottages springs to mind as a good possibility to explore. No, not a farm, but much more in keeping with how local food production is likely to evolve around here now. In summary, I believe that most people are supportive of a demo garden being built somewhere on Bowen. I believe the process missed an important stakeholder group: the park users. I believe that the park should be a protected natural space, managed just enough to allow people to enjoy the lovely beauty of the existing ecosystems safely and with minimal impact. I believe that this garden project must find another home. 23 Regional Parks Committee 88

89 I've been a Bowen resident for most of my 23-year-old life, and I'm writing to ask you to please reconsider the location of the proposed Crippen Meadow demonstration garden. The space is so important to the community: there is nowhere else quite like it on the island. Throughout the various stages of my life, it has provided a place to play make-believe, learn about natural ecosystems, play sports and games, draw inspiration from nature as a budding musician, walk my dog, watch community theatre and music, connect with family, friends and neighbours, and simply enjoy a peaceful, open patch amid such a richly forested area. In the few years since I've moved from Bowen to Vancouver, the meadow is a favourite spot to visit, reminisce, and show my off-island friends. I cannot stress enough how much the meadow is a quintessential part of Bowen Island, of what "home" means to me and so many others I know. I am so thankful for everything that space has meant to me as a young person, and I would hate for future islanders and visitors never to experience its magic. The prospect of a demonstration garden on Bowen excites me greatly, as a gardener and supporter of agricultural education: I really respect and appreciate the intent behind the project. But the island has other spaces that would make much more sense, benefiting the community rather than taking away something it cherishes. Snug Cove is an ideal spot - the garden would be much more accessible and receive way more exposure (I can attest to this from working for many summers interacting with tourists visiting the island), as well as having better, pre-existing infrastructure for necessary resources. Creating a huge human-made demonstration of a phenomenon already being displayed naturally in a healthy, self-sustaining ecosystem contains a sad irony: a rich educational opportunity is inherent in the Meadows as they stand. It certainly has been for me growing up. We need to celebrate nature's capable complexity, and educate about the importance of preserving and learning from natural ecosystems as best we can. The solution here seems like a no-brainer. Please, listen and be responsive to islanders who deeply understand the dynamic and context of the community we love: keep the unique, thriving ecosystem in the Meadows undisturbed, and leverage the full potential of the demonstration garden by building it in a space it would improve and inspire rather than disrupt and detract. Thank you so much for your time and consideration of this issue that is so dear to myself and my community. I wish to express my support for the pollinator demo garden proposed for Killarney Meadows in Crippen Park on Bowen Island. I believe that this project will add interest to the meadow, spark research and knowledge development regarding the local ecology, and encourage visitors to appreciate our island home just a little bit more. Thank you for your interest in supporting this project. (feedback continues next page) 24 Regional Parks Committee 89

90 I wrote five days ago expressing my support for the pollinator demo garden, which I think is a very good idea, but upon further consideration, I realize that Killarney Meadows in Crippen Park is the wrong location for this demo garden. Killarney Meadows does not offer the water or power resources that such a garden would need, and it is a healthy, naturally pollinating ecosystem that should not be disrupted. There are other locations on Bowen which are already significantly disturbed and would benefit from such a garden. Two that come to mind are: next to the Bowfest Field, or next to the baseball diamond. Both of these locations have water and power much more readily available and offer the additional benefit of a larger audience, since they are closer to the concentration of people coming off the ferry and attending events in Snug Cove. I apologize for having written too quickly before. I was excited about the idea of the garden and did not consider the proposed location carefully enough. Thank you for your consideration. I am writing to register my thoughts on the proposed pollinator demostration garden in Crippen Park. I feel that a pollinator demonstration garden is a fine idea... but not in the Crippen Park meadows. To build a human-made garden in an area that is on its way to becoming a thriving meadow and wetland, with many wild species returning to the undeveloped parts of it, would be destructive of this natural process. The pollinators come for the plants that are naturally there. The more we leave it alone, the more it will thrive. Now imagine such a garden in the cove, where there is little space for a true wilderness to exist. I understand that it's important to the Agricultural Alliance to build the garden on ALR land. Perhaps something more suitable can be found in the area near the Killarney Lake Parking lot or the pending development of the land around Grafton Lake (Rennison property). As for the fact that the meadow was once a farm - yes it was, although unsuitable for much more than seasonal grazing, as noted by the people who's family farmed it. And now, thanks to the beavers who have moved down there, it is becoming a wetland. Bowen has very little wetland and water catchment area. We can consider ourselves very lucky to be gaining this one, and (I hope) be less directive in its development. Picnic tables: How much do you learn about the wilderness while sitting up on a bench at a table, with a handy shelter over your head to keep off "the elements"? Now how much do you learn about the wilderness while sitting in the grass, with the elements shining or dripping down on your head? Learning about the land we live on requires us to stop building on it; stop creating intermediaries between the land and us, and actually just appreciate it for what it is on its own. Every few years Crippen Park seems to be eroded more and more by our activities: BIHORA, the mowing, the constant removal of dams, and the piping water through or over them to outwit the beavers, then the dog park built in what used to be the treasured Fairy Meadow, before it was decimated by mowing and fences. You know what I do with those kids from Wild Art groups? I take 25 Regional Parks Committee 90

91 them out exploring. We used to sit under that nice alder in the fairy meadow, collect the catkins and talk about the pollinators and the pollen. We watched the pollen fly from the tree. Those kids knew what their heritage was. They knew the importance of flowering trees and grasses... until all that was taken away. Now we avoid the meadow because there's nowhere nice to sit in the long grass, and there's dog poop everywhere. Now, to replace the natural pollinator attractants we can have a demonstration garden, instead? I'm sorry. But that just doesn't make any sense at all. Taking away what is naturally abundant just to replace it with a "demonstration" of what it should have been is absolutely nonsensical. That demonstration should happen in a place where "nature" is not already doing a better job than we are. I think it's highly disingenuous to claim that you spoke with the Nature Club, when in fact you haven't. You (Tom M.) spoke with me. Yes, I'm a Nature Club director, but first of all the Wild Art Program which he suggested I might run out of the building that was proposed at the time, is not a Nature Club program, and secondly the use of a covered or enclosed area defeats the purpose of the program. So I indeed stated my lack of interest. That does not constitute a communication with the Nature Club, and it certainly does not constitute support from the Nature Club. The Nature Club has met to discuss this, and not a single of our current directors has ever expressed support for this project in the Nature Club's name. In reading communications from directors and core members of other groups you have listed, I have discovered this to be a common problem. The support from these organizations seems to have been an integral part of your submission to Metro Vancouver, and yet it seems not to be based on fact. That brings up a big issue for me: Can we trust you? If you are going to build for your community, you need to have your community's support and confidence. In fact those two things may be of far greater value than whatever you end up building. I'm going to this to you, and copy it to Metro Vancouver. We would like to submit our comments on the proposed pollinator garden. This petition was put together as a means for people who felt uncomfortable ing Metro Vancouver in person to still voice their opinions, and it appears that all have done so courteously and often with support for BAA. I hope you will enjoy reading that this community does, after all, seem to be supportive. Please find attached two.pdf files. One contains the letter and individual comments made by some of the signatories; the other contains the letter and the names of all signatories. The two files are intended to be together. Thank you very much for hearing us, (petition) Please find an alternate location for a pollinator demonstration garden on Bowen Island. Crippen Park is a public park, used by much of the island's population for recreation, and also is becoming an ecologically valuable wetland and water catchment area, due to the fortuitous arrival of beavers in Killarney Creek. 26 Regional Parks Committee 91

92 A pollinator demonstration garden can be a wonderful educational resource, and we are not averse to having one on the island, but we feel that the proposed location in Killarney Meadows is unsuitable. The Killarney Meadows are already populated by many pollinators and naturallyoccurring pollinator attractors, especially in the currently un-mowed area being considered for the pollinator garden. To remove this and build a human-designed approximation would in fact disrupt the healthy process already happening, there. In addition, we would like to note the slow erosion of our public lands by private interests such as the dog park and BIHORA ring. To add a fenced garden and covered picnic area to the middle of the meadows will erode both the natural character and public enjoyment of the park dramatically. We would like to register our hope that the plans made by the Bowen Agricultural Alliance can be actualized in another location, hopefully someplace already built, such as the cove. Comments from 125 people; attached to message above, Same message as above, with the names of 310 people The meadow is a very peaceful place which the Bowen residents of all ages enjoy very much. Especially the children, young moms with their children and the elderly have their daily long walks there in peace. We spend quiet times in the meadow meditating, thinking, resting and/or just enjoying the nature. We don't want large fences, organized activities, study groups (even though we love children and appreciate education) and noisy crowds. Please let the meadow be and start the pollination garden somewhere more suitable. I am ing at the request of our local Agricultural Alliance in regards to the proposed pollinator demonstration garden at the meadow in Crippen Park on Bowen Island. While, I appreciate the idea of more education about our native ecosystems and species, I also really appreciate the quiet beauty of the meadow. The introduction of the education site and pollinator garden could benefit our community. The opportunity for the children to continue learning about out local and natural environment is a welcome one. My children have participated in the salmon release from the Fish Hatchery, and both still talk about it. It's no secret that the bees are in trouble, and more opportunity to learn and educate about this is crucial to everyone's future. The same is true for the butterflies and songbirds. I look forward to many more family events if this project goes through. 27 Regional Parks Committee 92

93 I am writing to you in regards to the Crippen Regional Park Proposed Pollinator Initiative and Demo Garden, I would like to go on record as being against the proposed site for this being Killarney Meadows and area proposed on the map. My family has lived on Bowen Island for over 30 years, and the area you are describing has been used by our family many, many, times, over those years. I used to ride my horse down to the meadow to practise for the horse shows; I won my first ribbon at the horse ring. As my father was a member of the Bowen Island nature club, many a day was spent wondering through the meadow and surrounding trails looking for birds and all sorts of insects. Also the meadow was used at night, by the Nature Club, to watch for owls and even bringing our telescopes to find the stars. The exact spot you are mentioning on the concrete slab, is where we set up our telescopes to look for passing comets. Obviously with no lights from buildings it was the perfect spot. Our dogs love running up and down the fields searching for interesting smells and playing with new doggie friends. The best thing about the fantastic Killarney Meadow and surrounding trails is that it doesn't look like it gets used much, but it does greatly by residence, visitors, students, animals. The impact is nil and we would like it to stay that way. Even as a child at the local school we used to run through the meadow as part of the Terry Fox run. It is a fantastic beautiful wide open space, that is free from buildings, exhibits, gazebos, that is why it is used by many Bowen Island Groups and local residence. There is a magic when you approach the Killarney Meadows where by entering at either end. The big wide open space is beautiful to walk through. From the overgrown trails full of trees, then you open out to the amazing wide space filled with grass, rimmed by shrubs. Or from the other end, there is Killarney trail, with a swamp, bridge, a tangle of birch trees, to then pop out to the wide expanse of the meadows. It is fantastic to walk through and see the different turrain and trees and plants and just breathe in the fresh air. To add a building to this site, or any other structures, would just ruin the whole impact of the place. Bowen does not have many wide open spaces for people to use on a daily basis, that let your horse, dog, children run free. Even the adults love running through here, its peaceful and serene and would be spoilt with demo gardens, planter pots, and building structures. There is only one other meadow down in the Cove, which is hard to access as a horse owner, at least with this horse ring and surrounding land, large amount of people can come and watch events, without leaving any impact to the area. I am all for the Pollinator Initiative and Demo Garden, I think it is a great idea, to teach people of all ages about how Mother Nature works. I really believe it would do Bowen Island good to have such a great education service provided to its residents. But there are far better places for this to be constructed. There are many vacant fields down in Sung Cove which get lots of sun, are easily accessible to the elementary schools, and also from visiting schools who could easily walk there from the ferry. Or how about over the Lagoon, the fields across from the old Hotel, where there actually used to be an amazing orchard? It gets fantastic sun all day, and would be inline with the Bowen Island historic agriculture of the past 100 years (the apples of these trees always tasted amazing)! 28 Regional Parks Committee 93

94 I speak for my entire family when I say please, please, please listen to the Bowen Island residence of new and old, and keep our special spots special. Do not build in spots that do not need building on, and ruining this beautiful space full of nature for all of us. We know the Park workers really work hard to keep Killarney Meadow looking great, and safe for all to use, we appreciate this everyday. And we enjoy this special spot ever so much, and have a million wonderful memories of the past times shared there with family and friends who have now passed on. Thank you so much for taking the time to read my and we hope the right decision is made. Living on the mainland these days, after many years on Bowen Island, I have a piece of Bowen in my tiny apartment: a print of a lovely painting by Bill Hoopes, called The Meadows. He has captured the subtle beauty and uncultivated tranquility of that bucolic space on a summer day. When I come back to Bowen to visit, I am drawn to The Meadows in Crippen Park as are so many others and the restorative powers of their peaceful hush and wide-open space. I have learned that some members of the Bowen Agricultural Alliance (BAA) are proposing to build a large demonstration garden so as to educate the public about pollination. I think that s a fine idea; I would like to know more myself. I also understand that they would like to situate this cultivation initiative in The Meadows. I firmly believe that that s the wrong place for it. I feel like Dr. Seuss s elephant protagonist, Horton, when he heard the Whos. There is already an evolved ecosystem thriving in and around the thirty-one thousand plus square feet area that has been targeted. It is delicate, complex, balanced and teeming with life. Why dig it up (and dump it. where?) so as to replace it with I gather from the plans raised beds, gravel paths, signage, a covered patio and 7 foot deer fencing? Can that even be done in a riparian zone? A fragile new garden is likely to need water during the summer months; where will that come from? And what of the loss for Vancouverites, islanders and those who come to Bowen from farther afield? I cannot think of another space like The Meadows so close to the urban centre. Community gardens are proliferating in Vancouver; The Meadows are entirely different, and they offer visitors a wonderful, unfamiliar experience. I would support the kind of garden centre proposed if it were situated in Snug Cove. The Cove Bay Water System could provide irrigation, and electricity is available there if needed. It would reach far more people at that location, and would be accessible to those with compromised mobility and other impediments. 29 Regional Parks Committee 94

95 Rather than profoundly disrupting an established ecosystem that is already doing everything this group espouses, wouldn t it be better to collaborate with experts at, for instance, Bowen Island Nature Club, Bowen Island Fish and Wildlife Club, Bowen Conservancy, and more, to create a booklet and even a smartphone app educating people about what is already going on in The Meadows? I think all that s needed is a tour guide. Because what s happening right now in The Meadows is a busy, fascinating, self-sustaining biological community where pollination plays a vital role in the established energy transformations and biogeochemical cycling that reflect a healthy ecology. Mother Nature has been working on this project for a century, and offers a demonstration every single day. I could not attend the evening meeting last night regarding the proposed garden in Crippen Park. I wanted to write to you to express my support of this idea. I think creating this park in the location of the old dairy farm is a terrific idea for Crippen Park and for Bowen Islanders. All of the elements proposed sound completely appropriate for the location and the park. I also completely support and commend your partnership with BAA, as they are a terrific island organization committed to creating & supporting agricultural opportunities on Bowen. I look forward to watching this project develop. We totally support the idea of a pollinators demonstration garden in the meadows on Bowen Island. It is a great idea. I stand with many wanting to save the natural beauty of the meadow. The pollination education garden is an interesting idea and would be an obvious and ideal attraction in the snug cove area around the heritage cottages that would welcome tourist and residents as an easy access attraction because of its central location and is easily available to handicapped, seniors, families with strollers...and easier to maintain and secure as it is the heart of action of our island. Please reconsider the site to enhance our island not diminish our natural attractions. This stuff doesn't usually bug me, but putting a pollinator garden where the snake field is now in the Meadows - complete with chain-link fence etc - is, I reckon, such a pity. I spent hours upon hours of my 18 years on Bowen Island walking dogs, riding bikes and catching up with friends in the Crippen Park Meadow. The Meadow is where we stopped for lunch when taking a school field trip to the fish hatchery in Elementary School. 30 Regional Parks Committee 95

96 It was where I stopped to play games with the summer camp groups where I was a camper and later a counsellor. It was where I watched my sister in her first horse show. So although I now live in Vancouver, it is a place that is very special to me. I still have friends that I made in preschool on the Island and we all recognize how incredibly fortunate we were to grow up in such an exquisite natural environment. To let our imaginations run wild in forests and open spaces. I want others who come to get to experience the same beauty and tranquility of the Crippen Park Meadows that I did. This is why I am asking you to please consider another space for the proposed Pollinator Education Garden. Please let the Meadow exist as it does. It is more than enough on its own. I view the Meadow as an extremely educational site on its own. Not many young people can claim that they were able to do a field study on natural insect habitats with their grade 5 class. Please understand I think the Pollinator Garden could offer many opportunities for educational experiences however I think it would be better suited in a more accessible area with a yearround water supply. I am 23 years old and I have spoken with those same friends that I made in preschool and grew up with on the Island. The Meadow matters to young people who are lucky enough to call Bowen Island their hometown. It would be a great loss to the community to see it altered in such a drastic way. Untold numbers of Vancouver tourists come to Bowen to walk around Killarney Lake. They also walk across the little bridge and into the meadow - as do Bowen residents. No one is against the idea of the garden. Who would be? They are simply against it changing the experience of and the gentle atmosphere of the Meadow. Fences and a gazebo, and increased buzz and activity have no place in the Meadow. I know people in Vancouver who make it an annual thing to come to Bowen to do this walk - almost like a pilgrimage. I also know of several people who come every year on their respective birthdays to do this walk. We have to show respect for what we have that is lovely in Crippen Park AND also respect the wishes of over 200 people who have signed this petition. Please put the garden elsewhere. I know the Heritage Society for the Orchard Cabins expressed an interest in having the garden - but were dismissed. 31 Regional Parks Committee 96

97 We are writing to you to strongly register our opposition to Crippen Park Meadow being turned into a cultivated pollinator garden. Having lived full-time on Bowen Island for over 22 years, we have walked through this marvellous natural habitat thousands of times in all seasons and believe that the natural beauty of the area must absolutely be preserved. This natural meadow is definitely not the right location for a fenced, gated, cultivated pollinator garden. In fact, the current meadow is already a location for native pollinators and needs no "improvement". As it currently exists it is a healthy, diverse habitat for indigenous pollinators. A wide variety of flowering plants provides abundant nectar and pollen throughout the spring, summer and fall. The rough ground, exposed soil and woody debris provides needed nesting and over-wintering habitat for a variety of native leaf-cutter, bumble, and blue orchard bees plus a variety of caterpillars that cocoon here, to emerge as adult moths ready to pollinate in spring. This beautiful natural meadow is also full of voles and field mice. Raptors of all species including Red tailed Hawks, Peregrine Falcons and Barred Owls can be seen constantly hunting from dense trees that surround this wild meadow. There are also an abundance of local snake species, red racers, garter and boas that can be found from spring until fall in the long grasses of this meadow including their tiny new offspring that can be seen slithering through and sheltering in the meadow's long grasses in the late spring. Large numbers of Bowen Island's black-tailed deer also use this natural meadow to graze, to shelter, and to transit through. They can often be seen with their young fawns in early summer in the meadow, watchful and keeping their distance on the edges of the meadow. The presence of more human traffic, fences, gates and the destruction of the local flora and fauna will completely disrupt the natural usage in this area. Unthinkable and unacceptable! This part of Crippen Park is already fragmented enough with two large horse paddocks and a dog park in very close proximity. We do not want to see any more fragmentation or loss of the natural habitat in Crippen Park and especially in this meadow that we so treasure. There are other far better places on the island for the proposed pollinator garden. In fact a brand new, large garden has just been constructed right next to the Bowen Island Community School. If the proposed pollinator garden were to be coupled with this new school garden existing immediately adjacent to the school, this would give students greater opportunities to be involved in the pollinator garden, incorporate the running of it in the school curriculum and thus maximize the benefit to the school's student body. In summary, we vehemently oppose the placement of this cultivated pollinator garden in Crippen Park Meadow and we trust that the staff of Metro Parks will fulfill their obligations to the park mandate by protecting and preserving this precious meadow in its current natural state. The idea of destroying a natural pollinator area to construct a cultivated pollinator garden is absolutely misplaced, wrong-headed and simply must not be allowed to happen. 32 Regional Parks Committee 97

98 Thank you for your judicious consideration of this letter. We look forward to an appropriate solution to this major threat to the Crippen Park Meadow by directing the proponents to seek out a different and far more appropriate location. I am writing in support of the pollinator garden in Crippen Park Meadow on Bowen Island. A wonderful learning opportunity I believe that the Bowen Agriculture Alliance s concept of the pollinator garden is an eminently sensible project for our beloved meadows and support it (and any local food production system on Bowen Island) whole heartedly. The only down side I see is that it makes perfect sense, and here on Bowen, things that make sense seem to be doomed to limbo. Please do not go ahead with any changes in the meadows on Bowen Island. It is used by so many residents of all ages and will be missed by many if changes are made. I think it's a great idea! I strongly disapprove of a Pollinator Garden in Crippen Park Meadow on Bowen Island. We have always enjoyed this meadow for its vast open space in the middle of forested trails. Please leave it as it is. We do like the concept of a Pollinator Garden and would enjoy seeing it closer to the Cove. Of the many other areas to choose from, the area around the historic cottages seems like a good fit. It would also be good for Bowen business to have more critical mass within the cove. Some people oppose any change on Bowen Island, and you will find many of their names on a petition against the pollinator demonstration garden in the meadows of Crippen Park. They are also promoting an opinion paper in which one of them warns that putting such a garden in the meadows would be ecologically disastrous. (To counter the perception that they are saying no because they always do, they claim to only object to the location apparently other parts of Bowen could absorb the ecological insult without dire consequence.) In contrast, I have learned that two eminent SFU scientists with relevant expertise (Mark Winston and Gail Anderson) are highly supportive of both the concept and the proposed location, and a third SFU scientist, Elizabeth Elle, who has received international recognition for her work with wild bees, has already offered her support. I enthusiastically agree with the proposal, not only because it has the overwhelming weight of scientific opinion in its favour, but also because of its educational aspects and the historical implications of its location all of which are so capably outlined in the proposal itself. I know that area of the park well, and look forward to visiting and enjoying the garden in the near future. 33 Regional Parks Committee 98

99 Please do not touch the meadow on Bowen Island - in Crippen Park where the horse arena is... that is the last thing we want are signs, raised planters etc... just leave it alone. I am writing in regards to the Crippen Park Proposed Pollinator Initiative and Demo Garden. I am an admirer of the BAA and think they do great things here on Bowen Island. However, I feel I must write to register my objection to the proposed initiative in the Crippen Park meadows. Good plan, wrong place. A 'demo garden' does not belong in the meadows and is much better suited to other places on the island, such as the Community School, which has space, water, infrastructure, adjacent parking, and is under-utilized. (I have heard that $ 14,000 was recently expended on the new school garden.) Another possibility is behind the cabins in Snug Cove, which again have space, water, nearby parking, and were historically gardened, unlike the meadows. Furthermore, I fail to understand by a 'structure' needs to be built to increase appreciation of pollinators. Thank you for your consideration of my remarks There is a wide circulated fallacy circulated among certain prominent Bowen Islander s and it is the broken record of Bowen Island is a polarized community where nothing ever happens. I start my comments here because as a Landscape Architect, Planner and Architect I m a firm believer in due process. I received the following comment from my friend who I asked about process on this proposal, here s what she said: I went to their consultation eighteen months ago. It was very nice and explorative, but had no space for concerns. I think it is on the basis of that that they are claiming all these endorsements, but that's not really accurate. They did not at any point say 'Do you endorse this on behalf of your board.' Even then they were talking about people being 'obstructive', and fussing about confidentiality. So they keep everyone in the dark, without really having any clue about what values they might be clod hopping into, and then when they find themselves at the centre of the shit storm, they say 'we told you so' and start writing shitty letters to the paper. Basically it says a lot to me about the process. At one time I was supportive of this project, until I really started understanding it. You see, I have a 10 year old daughter, a budding landscape architect perhaps, for sure a conservationist. She s already raised more than $1,000 towards the Nature Conservancy of Canada (through used toy sales) a true force for nature. As a father I often take her to the meadow. It s her favorite place on Bowen, and mine too. What makes it so special for her are the ruins where she can catch garter snakes, lots of garter snakes. For me watching her in this activity connects me to my childhood and to her and to Bowen Island and to Crippen Park. 34 Regional Parks Committee 99

100 Obviously this part of the Meadow is a sacred cow, and I think the proponents of this project knew that going into this process, and rather than crafting a public process, they crafted a war plan. Just look at the musings on the Bowen Island forum. This stuff does not build community it does the opposite it tears it apart. Back to the Bee Pollinator garden well what s not to like about a garden? It s hard to fault anyone for such a noble effort and I m all for gardens just not in this location, a small piece of Bowen heritage, a fascinating ecotone, a place of wonder for children, and an important edge in one of Bowen s most amazing outdoor rooms. The basic problem with this proposal is the all or nothing mandate. There is no room for dialogue, nor does it appear to have compassion for folks like me who take an opposing view. They drop their plan on people, get feedback, then start calling the people who give feedback names. Instead they should have explained the concept, worked up from there. Better yet, they should have given the public options to weigh in on. And is it true nothing happens on Bowen because we are polarized and hence that s the merit in developing this site? Not so. John Reid s project for a new community of clustered housing across the Island received broad community support and rezoning last year. A proposal which includes, what could be characterized as a controversial element, a retreat for families with children with down syndrome. No NIMBYism over this one. The infill of the Village Square, another great project on Bowen. No community opposition. That great ole Cedar tree by the front door of the Ruddy had to come down, but the owners were sensitive to the diverse range of folk who reside on Bowen and did everything in their power to save it. But in the end it was a hazard. But they were inclusive in their thoughts and process and there were no letters to the UC over that project because the project and the process was well conceived. There are many more projects I could list, but hopefully Metro Vancouver can see through the rhetoric and realize that options need to be put out there for a better location for this project such as the upper Bowfest Field just below the ball diamond. A space rarely used by Bowen Islanders and a location that would draw more people to the Cove. I m sure there are many other locations to, if a small clearing in the forest was to happen in support of this project. I am writing as a concerned former Canadian (now Australian) resident, and citizen of both countries, concerning the proposed demonstration pollinator garden at Crippen Park, Bowen Island. I travel to Bowen Island regularly to visit family and have spend many hours at the park and walking in and around the meadow areas. This is precious native bushland to Western Canada and should not be disturbed. Any movement of soil and disturbance of groundcover will give way to weed infestations, loss of species and land habitat for birds and other wildlife. Surely a location closer to Snug Cove would be more suitable to the proposed type of activity given proximity to infrastructure and promotional opportunities for tourists etc. Having experienced the disappearance of 97% of native Australian grasslands in the area in which I live (near Canberra, the capital city), I have seen the results first hand of land clearance and the invasion of non-indigenous plant species it is an 35 Regional Parks Committee 100

101 ongoing issue for our Australian landcare groups and conservationists given the age and fragility of the Australian continent. Canada is such a young country in terms of its geological history and there is still time to preserve this precious land for future generations. I urge you to take these issues into consideration as a matter of global significance. I wholeheartedly disagree with the changes proposed for the meadow. I walk through the meadow at least 5 times a week, always enjoying it s beauty and tranquility. The proposed pollinator garden should be in the Cove amongst the heritage apple trees. The meadow is the wrong place, please consider the number of people who want to retain the meadow as it is. I love to walk through Crippen Park regularly. It is such a beautiful, peaceful and natural environment and the meadows are a pleasure to visit. Please keep it this way. I would really like to see this demonstration garden somewhere else on Bowen Island (Snug Cove?) though and would enjoy visiting and learning about pollinators. I most likely won't visit the meadows as often if there are man-made shelters, signs and raised beds instead of nature. I and my family of four fully support all of the work of the BAA and support their proposal for the centre at the proposed location. I would like to comment on the recent interest in using Crippen Park Meadows for various initiatives, including community gardens. I am very much in favour of using and preserving the ALR, of preserving natural spaces on Bowen, especially our parklands. As of now we have a lovely green oasis in the meadows. Some of the proposals would enhance this area and encourage the wildlife, including bees. A very important initiative. But Community Gardens? I don t think so. Let's look at some history. The Terminal Steamships and the USS Co which followed it, used the meadows as pastureland. As mentioned, there are concrete foundations still in evidence in the meadow. This is where there was a stable for riding horses in the 40's, not earlier. The dairy herd was not barned (if one can use that term) there. Under the USS Ço there was a large barn where Melmore now curves around. The herd was milked there, then driven to the meadows for grazing, returning at night. John Lister was the employee in charge. When the USS Co divested itself of the dairy operation, Mr Lister took over the herd and drove it to his home in the Trout Lake Valley. The heroic part of the story belongs to Marjory Lister. Every morning on the way to school (which was 36 Regional Parks Committee 101

102 where the works yard is now) she would drive the herd back to the Meadow to pasture. After school she would drive them home to Delight Valley (As it was called). The USS Co had large vegetable gardens, but they were on more upland slopes, where there was more sun and the right amount of water -- somewhat a continuation of the slope Collins Farm is on. Houses now cover those slopes. So I am in favour of Community Gardens, but not on Crippen Park Meadows. There are other areas that can be used, more suitable as to sun and the right amount of moisture, and leave the Meadows for the enjoyment of the public! I sent a letter some weeks ago outlining my reasons for opposing your plans for Crippen Park Meadow. I will try to recap: First, is there a similar area on Bowen, a lovely green meadow surrounded by trees and accessible to the public--in a park, no less? No, there isn't. So why is Metro Park agreeable to destroying the beauty of this unique spot? Alright, land in the ALR is to be used for agriculture. But also to protect the ecosystems that are vital to retaining the natural systems we love, pollination included. No, there is no need to destroy the Meadow. A better area with more sun and a lower water table could easily be found if we need to grow vegetables. There are some misconceptions being written. Terminal Farms and Union Estates farming did not include vegetable farming on the meadows. It was used as pasture land for grazing cattle. The cattle were kept in a large barn where Melmore Street and houses are situated now. The cows were driven every morning after milking to the meadows to graze. At night they were driven back to the barn. Also, the barn foundations now evident in the meadow are from a horse stable, used for stabling riding horses in the nineteen forty's. When the Union Estates divested itself of its dairy business, John Lister, an employee who had been responsible for the herd, took the cattle to his home in the Trout Lake Valley. From there they were driven back to the meadows in the morning--back to Lister's at night. Marjorie Lister, daughter, was the one to drive the herd to and from the meadow morning and afternoon. She drove them on the way to and from school---school at that time being where the works yard is now. The USS Co had vegetable gardens on the slope that continues down from Collins Farm. There, with adequate sun and water, many vegetables were grown to supply the hotel and store with fresh produce. Houses now cover those slopes. So why allow the meadows to be used now for an unsuitable use, growing vegetables, and in the process destroying such a treasure? As a resident of Bowen Island, I am writing to express my support for this proposed project. The meadow was once an active farm and is a gathering place for Bowen Islanders. I believe that a 37 Regional Parks Committee 102

103 pollinator garden, and the resulting community engagement and participation that it would create, is a perfect use for the section of the meadow proposed. Please let me know if you need any more information. Thank you. I couldn't make the Dec. 9 meeting but I am concerned about this project. While I love the concept -- I would rather see it brought to fruition in an area that is already built up with man made things, in amongst the Orchard Cottages, perhaps? The meadow is a place where, for the most part, you get to see simple, beautiful nature in a wide, clear open space, which is a refreshing tonic for many people. Many Bowen Islanders and visitors feel a particular bond with the meadow because it is so peaceful. I can't say I'm enthusiastic about visions of signage, fencing, raised beds and other accoutrements that may be required for building on official parkland -- surfaced paths? Washrooms? Triple garbage cans? I hope Council brings this to the Bowen Public for vote. As I said -- I love the idea. There's a big veggie garden at my house and I grow 8 bee attracting plants to keep it successful. Just somewhere else please!! The Board of Directors of the Bowen Nature Club would like to express our concerns about the proposed pollinator demonstration garden in Killarney Meadow of Crippen Park. Killarney Meadow is the biggest open meadow on Bowen Island and because of this the Bowen Nature Club has hosted many field trips and events in this special area. Development of a fenced garden in this area increases the fragmentation of an otherwise complete ecosystem. The little used horse ring and off-leash dog park have already taken away a large portion of the meadow area. Further, the foundation of the old barn, which is included in the planned development, is home to a well-known hibernaculum for Garter snakes. The educational goals of Bowen Agricultural Alliance's demonstration garden can be achieved by simple observance of the presently existing native species of flora and fauna. To develop this area with non-native plant and insect species undermines the naturally occurring work in progress. We feel that Bowen Agricultural Alliance would be better to educate the public about garden pollination in an area which has been developed and is more accessible to the public such as Davies Orchard. This location would also support the pollination of the existing mature fruit trees. Crippen Park is a regional park which belongs to all of us. Although we understand the positive nature of BAA's intention Bowen Island is a small community which regrets every piece developed in its most beloved gathering spot. 38 Regional Parks Committee 103

104 This is a note to let you know that, as a Bowen resident, I vote in favour of leaving the Crippen Meadow as is. I suggest the garden should be elsewhere. Thank you. I wish to add my name to those opposed to the proposed destruction of the meadow in order to put in a pollination garden instead of protecting the already pristine Ecosystem which already exists. My children grew up playing in this meadow the only real unspoiled green space on Bowen that is open and undeveloped. It would be a crying shame to not preserve this environment for future generations. We are writing to send our comments on the Proposed Pollinator Initiative and Demo Garden on Bowen Island. We do not support the location of the Demo Garden at Killarney Meadows. Our family has lived on Bowen Island since We have used the Meadow extensively throughout our lives. It is one of the few natural open unstructured spaces left on the island that is available to the public and accessible to all at every stage of their lives. As a young mother I took my baby and toddler there to meet with friends, for picnics and birthdays. My daughter visited the Meadows on field trips with her preschool and grade schools to study and enjoy nature. As a Sparks, Brownie and Guide Leader we used the Meadows for various activities. My husband and I have been on field trips to the Meadow to explore the world of bugs and its natural diversity. We enjoy the natural beauty of the Meadow when we walk or run through it. My elderly mother, who is 87, loves to walk to the Meadow with her cane and rest on one of the benches all the while enjoying the view. We believe that for persons living on Bowen and those visitors from off island, the Meadow best serves the public in its present natural state. I believe that the demonstration garden and fencing would change the flexibility to use the space, and impact both the existing habitat and beautiful vista that is now present. While we support and applaud the BAA initiative we do not support the location of the Demo Garden at Killarney Meadows. I have recently attended an information evening regarding the Bowen Island Agricultural Alliance's desire to create a pollinator garden. I listened carefully and feel I understand the plan. I support the plan because it will benefit rural families trying to grow their own food through education and instruction. I support the location of the proposed site in Crippen Park as it suits the existing mixed use of the park but more importantly it makes Crippen Park more of a learning destination site for on island residents and teachers and students from the mainland wishing to have a condensed site for field trips. I am a former teacher and have raised two west coast children from birth to young adulthood. Currently, according to a Victoria TV station, parents of kindergarten aged children were 39 Regional Parks Committee 104

105 willing to camp out overnite in tents, in order to secure registration for kindergarten that is 50% taught outdoors! This reflects the value our society places on outdoor education. As a Bowen Island resident I am writing to provide feedback in regards to the pollinator garden as proposed by the Bowen Agricultural Alliance. I am also a member of the Alliance, though I have not been involved in any of the preparations or discussions about the garden. I support the concept of the pollinator garden wholeheartedly. But I do not support the proposed location in the Crippen Regional Park meadow. The meadow is a very beautiful and special place; I'll even describe it as a majestic place, as a result of its natural, open terrain surrounded by mountain vistas. Whenever I walk through the meadow it gives me a great feeling of peace and calm. It is also very wonderful to watch the meadow change through the seasons and the different insects and wild life that thrive there. According to the plans that I have viewed, the pollinator garden would fence off a significant part of the meadow. This will not only impact the snakes, insects, birds and fauna that inhabit this area, but the fenced garden will dramatically alter the meadow as an open and relatively natural space. As one acquaintance stated, Bowen has many farms, but we only have one meadow. Many Islanders have suggested that a more appropriate location for the pollinator garden would be in the Snug Cove area. Specially, Davies Orchard is a potential site that should be considered and evaluated. It is my understanding that the Bowen Heritage Society (and I am also a member) are certainly open to exploring this option. Second, the open green space between the baseball diamond and the Bowfest field is a highly under-utilized area. In fact, this may be the most ideal and beneficial location. There is a lot of talk on Island about revitalizing the Snug Cove area - to make it more "attractive" and to offer visitors and tourists a more enjoyable experience. In my opinion, a pollinator garden located in Snug Cove at one of these locations would be a wonderful addition to Snug Cove. In fact, if the goal behind the pollinator garden is to raise awareness and educate about the importance and how-to of pollination, then locating the garden in Snug Cove is the best option. Many visitors to Bowen Island never visit the meadow because they do not have the ability to get there or the physical capacity to walk that far. But if the pollinator garden is located in Snug Cove, then most visitors will easily have access to go to the garden and this will create a much more vibrant, viable and utilized pollinator garden - for all. Thank you for this opportunity to share my personal thoughts and insights. I sincerely hope that the best location of the pollinator garden will be based on a comprehensive analysis of all the facts and issues involved, as well as in accordance with the wishes of all Bowen Island residents. I would urge you delay any decision on the increasingly divisive issue of a proper location for a Pollinator Garden on Bowen Island. The lead proponent is Dr. Neil Boyd. But Mr. Boyd has no degree which confers the title Doctor. He is sometimes referred to as Doctor in internal Simon 40 Regional Parks Committee 105

106 Fraser discussions but officially he is not a Doctor. You can confirm this with Simon Fraser University. Second: One of his two entomology experts bowed out after being brought up to date on the fact that the area in question is a natural meadow, not reclaimed farmland. And Mr. Boyd's second entomology expert is in fact an Associate Professor of Criminology, where Mr. Boyd is the Director of the School of criminology at Simon Fraser. This is a huge conflict of interest which has not yet come out and I hope never does. As for the main opponent of the location, he is not the "self-described local expert" that Mr. Boyd describes. Will Husby is a nationally recognized expert in creating interpretive and educational sites within parks across Canada. His clients include, but are not limited to, the National Capital Commission where he developed the interpretive Master Plan for Canada's Capital Greenbelt (Ottawa). Other clients include Parks Canada (Prince Albert National Park), Rouge Park Alliance (Greater Toronto Area), Rouge Park (now Rouge Park National Park Reserve), Alberta Parks: Fish Creek Provincial Park (Canada s largest urban park, Calgary), Beaver Hills District (greater Edmonton area). All of these interpretive plans, which Will Husby designed, included the selection of interpretive sites based on location and the sensitivity of sites and features. Will is recognized throughout North America as a go to person when it comes to designing interpretative and educational sites in parks. Will Husby has an MSc in entomology from Guelph University and for the last quarter century has made his living as the senior partner of EcoLeaders Interpretation, which is a planning consultancy specializing in interpretive and education planning for park systems, parks, museums, and nature centres across Canada and in the US. The BAA wants an interpretive and education site and that is exactly what Will does professionally. As well, he and his partner Sue Ellen Fast (a Bowen Island Municipal councillor), produced Nature Walks, a critically acclaimed 52 part, four year long TV series focused on public education of the natural environment. Consequently, Will Husby is eminently qualified to hold an opinion on the proposed location for the Pollinator Initiative. And very media savvy. He is not happy that this issue was sprung on him at the last minute. There is no one against the idea of a Pollinator Garden but the location proposed has only been recently sprung on the community and it is very fair to say that there is outrage that much of the deliberation was carried out behind closed doors. We may not like who is elected in our elections but the elections are free and open so we bow to the selection process. But the same cannot be said about a selection process that is held behind closed doors until the last possible moment. If you rush a decision before the community debate is finished (it has barely begun), then you face the possibility of demonstrations in Crippen Park, under the media's eye. Now that we are finally having an open discussion, I expect the community will arrive shortly at a location that is picked in a fair and open manner, which it has not been to date. A pollinator garden is a great idea but the location is terrible as it will take a large swath out of one of the very few remaining meadows in the Lower Mainland area. Please give us time to carry out am open and fair community evaluation so that the results will be respected by all, even those who are uncomfortable with the final decision. I went to a meeting last night during which the Bowen Agricultural Alliance presented their vision for a pollinator garden and co-presenters from Metro parks outlined how the process would work. I think that a lot of creative energy has gone into the idea, and we're lucky on Bowen that we have people willing to create beautiful things for educational and other purposes. I find I'm very conflicted over the project because of where they propose to place it. I could fully 41 Regional Parks Committee 106

107 support the garden in a different location - personally I'd support somewhere on the north side of Government Road, or near the cottages and orchard in the lower Snug Cove. If it were placed in the meadow, for me it would cause some personal pain and I don't think I would appreciate it the way it deserves. It's quite a large area. The area would need to be fenced in order to keep out deer, and some of the area would actually be locked off as I understand for understandable security for some tools perhaps. From what I understand, it wouldn't necessarily improve the pollination of the area in a practical sense, but would be more about education. The plan also features an open classroom, which I guess would mean a structure with a metal roof which could serve to collect rainwater. So this would mean more fences, more structures in an area that I highly value on an almost daily basis as an open space without much in the way of build structures. I think that some people view the land as an overgrown farm because at one time it was indeed producing food. Others of us view it as a welcome reclamation of land by forest, wetland and habitat. To me it's not overgrown - it's natural. And it's perfect without adding structures or gardens - it is a garden already. So it is such as shame to find myself opposing what otherwise is a wonderful idea and shows generosity of spirit on the part of the folks proposing it. Would it be possible to hold another meeting so people could discuss the merits of the project but also put other locations on the table? I know the proponents like the centrality of the park, but as you know Snug Cove is very accessible as well. Many people have been talking about beautifying the Cove, and this would be a wonderful way to do that at the same time, while the meadow needs no beautifying. This way, people could learn about how pollination works, then go to the meadow to see it in nature. Again, I would be a supporter if for example the riding ring and dog park didn t already present fences, and if there were no building in the plan. I just hope a decision won t be taken that would divide our community again - we re really trying to lighten the tone of conversation and decision making on the island and we ve been through so much already! This is to confirm my opposition to the development of a demonstration garden of any sort in the Killarney Meadows in Crippen Park. I have lived on Bowen Island for over 40 years, and have frequented the meadows both before and after the establishment of the park. The natural area of the meadows is unique in the park, and there is no similar, publicly accessible, land on the island, most of which is thickly wooded. I continue to walk to the meadows often, and appreciate the meadows in their current natural state. Any further development of the meadows will diminish my enjoyment of the Park. I believe this is also true for a great number of islanders. 42 Regional Parks Committee 107

108 Further, the Park is a destination for many people from the Metro area. These visitors come to Bowen and the Park to enjoy the peace and closeness to nature. I say this on the basis of many conversations I have had with visitors over the years, most of which begin with questions about directions and lead to "what do you want to see". My own impressions in this regard have been confirmed by questionnaires of visitors to the Island, of which you are undoubtedly aware. If a demonstration pollinator garden is important for Bowen, which I doubt given the large proportion of islanders who engage in gardening, it should be located in an area where it is readily accessible, such as Snug Cove, and preferably not in the Park. Maintaining the untouched, peaceful integrity of the Killarney Meadow is the highest priority for Metro Vancouver residents As you noticed at the meeting of December 9 on Bowen Island, while most people do not object to the idea of a pollinator demonstration garden, a significant number of us felt strongly that it should not be situated in the Killarney meadow. Various reasons for our opposition was brought up, such as the lack of available water in the Summer, the existence of a snake habitat in the immediate vicinity of the proposed garden, and various concerns raised by entomologist Will Husby. Mr. Husby's wife, Sue Ellen Fast, also echoed the growing concern among islanders that the addition of yet another amenity to the meadow will affect the fundamental nature and character of the meadow itself. During the meeting, she astutely posed the question: "When is a meadow no longer a meadow?". The meadow now has a large fenced dog park and horse riding area, and the general area also includes a fish hatchery and recycling depot. The proposed pollinator demonstration garden would be in the main portion of the meadow - which would affect the area visually and involve increased human activities beyond the simple enjoyment of the meadow's immense feeling of serenity and peacefulness. In the increasingly hectic world in which Greater Vancouverites live, that kind of experience is priceless and it will become ever more priceless as Metro Vancouver becomes an increasingly urbanized area. Shouldn't the preservation of that kind of experience be your first, overriding priority as the stewards of parks in Metro Vancouver? In contrast to the concern about the dehumanization of society in increasingly urban environments, the Killarney meadow offers a truly unique, serene experience which dovetails beautifully with the placid peacefulness of Killarney Lake. Having worked in the field of acoustics, I am aware of the fact that there was an acoustic study of Greater Vancouver some years ago, where sound levels were recorded at 10,000 locations throughout the region. Killarney Lake was found to be the quietest area in all of Metro Vancouver. As stewards of parks for the people of Metro Vancouver, the third largest, ever growing urban area in Canada, what would be more valuable to them in the future? I would strongly submit that maintaining the untouched, peaceful integrity of the Killarney meadow is the highest priority for Metro Vancouver residents, for their children and their children's children. In fact, my first experience in walking through the Killarney meadow reminded me of many wonderful times spent as a child in a forest meadow adjacent to our house in a suburb of Montreal, as we lived on the edge of the developed area in our town. That town has now been amalgamated into the sprawling city of Laval and that meadow became but a faint though very special memory - until it was 43 Regional Parks Committee 108

109 rekindled again in the Killarney meadow of Crippen Regional Park. I think it would be fitting to preserve such an experience for our kids and ourselves in an area adjacent to the most peaceful lake in Metro Vancouver. I strongly believe that the wisest decision when it comes to the Killarney meadow is to basically let nature be - which is also the basic reason we have parks, and the fundamental mandate of Metro Parks. I just wanted to go on record to say that I really think the Meadows area on Bowen Island is not the best location for the demonstration garden. The meadow is one of my favourite areas and has its own unique ecosystem that should be preserved as nature intended it. I think the idea of the garden has merit and think it would be more appropriate to locate it near the old Davies orchard to encourage better pollination for the apples in the area and it is also a better location for tourists. I hope you will add my view to you list of collected opinions. Thank you for your role in making the meeting last night happen. Please be advised that I do support moving forward on this initiative. I believe that over time Bowen will become a centre for eco-education and the Killarney Meadows project is a step toward that aspiration. Knowing the people who are behind this strategy, I have every confidence that the majority of the concerns brought forward last night will be addressed. No project will ever proceed with unanimity, but I believe that overall support will be possible if concerns are heard, acknowledged, and addressed. Key to this will be ongoing communication. With regard to the location, although I support the Killarney Meadows as a choice, I would support any reasonable location. For me, the key issue is to move forward with the beginnings of an ecoeducation strategy that reaches beyond our own population. Bowen is such a jewel so close to such a densely populated area, I believe we have a responsibility to both protect and to share the riches of the island's natural habitat, not only for enjoyment but also to increase the overall appreciation and understanding. I appreciate the opportunity of submitting my support. I am in opposition to this proposal as I feel it will destroy the beauty of the meadow and restrict its use by all visitors. Please do not proceed with this proposal. Yes to Crippen Park. I just want to add my two cents to support the idea of putting the Pollinator Garden in Crippen Park. This is a great location as it already draws a lot of families etc. and adds to the enjoyment and interest of the area. 44 Regional Parks Committee 109

110 I don't believe this would be environmentally damaging and the area was already used for farming in the past so it is not like going into an "unspoilt" area of the island and changing the nature/function of that area. I wholeheartedly support the idea. I am totally in support or your initiative to put the pollinator garden right where you have suggested in the meadow. But I am worried that the vocal opposition will derail it and wanted to put forward a possible solution which may suit all. Could you approach BIHORA about giving up the riding ring and returning it to communal use? I haven't seen it used for many years (I was an avid rider for at least 15 years on Bowen and maybe used it twice). The heavy layer of mulch does much to take away from the natural character, wildlife and pollination abilities of the meadow, so taking over that already fenced tract could be the answer if BIHORA and the powers to be are okay with it. All opposition would be moot as you would be restoring an already fenced, spoilt and barely used piece of land to the benefit of all. Good luck with the project! I am in full support of the pollinator garden and location proposed in the Meadow. However, I wanted to propose something which may be a win-win situation for all sides. The horse ring, currently run by Bowen Island Horse and Rider Association (BIHORA) has long been left to fall into disrepair. It covers a large area of the meadow, is rarely used and only by an extremely small group of people, and the heavy mulching of the ground has done much more to destroy the natural ecosystem of the meadow that the garden proposal ever would. I haven't seen a single rider use that ring in many years and I frequently go the meadow to exercise my dogs in the off leash area or drive past it. I was, and so are both my children, ardent horse riders and horse owners on Bowen, so this is not a "them and us" suggestion. As riders we perhaps used the the meadow ring twice as there is a MUCH better facility for training, organised horse events and shows on the island elsewhere. Indeed the horse ownership on Bowen has significantly fallen in recent years due to increased traffic and disinterest. I support the Meadow location rather than an alternative location in the Cove as it gives walk-on tourists a reason to stay longer, to step outside of the Cove and walk a reasonable distance and ultimately spend more money on Bowen (better for businesses and more interesting for them). Putting all interesting sites in the Cove just crams everything into one area and they can be done in an hour! Those opposing the garden in the Meadow have unanimously stated on the Bowen Forum that they like the idea of the garden but it just should not be taking up already valuable space in the meadow. This would be the answer. Reclaim something that is rarely (if ever) used and replace it with something that everyone can enjoy. I attended the recent information meeting hosted by metro and BAA regarding the creation of a pollinator/demonstration garden in Killarney meadows. 45 Regional Parks Committee 110

111 I must say how impressed I was with the thoroughness of the planning and research performed around this project. The meadows are one of my favourite places on the island and I walk there almost every day with my dogs. It's serene and the Beavers have created an ever changing landscape. Over the years I've watched the ecology of this area change significantly from being mostly alders surrounding a meandering creek to its present marshland. When I look at the history of this area I see that this has been happening for many years and it will continue to change in the future. I feel that creating a pollinator initiative and demonstration garden will greatly enhance the park and add to our island an additional outdoor educational experience. This will draw islanders out into yet another gathering place as well as provide an area of interest to visitors. I wholeheartedly support this initiative, commend the visionaries of this project and look forward to learning all about the butterflies and bees! As someone who lived on Bowen for almost 22 years and who walked through the Crippen Meadows almost every day, I want to add my voice to the growing chorus of people who sincerely hope you will not go ahead with the proposed pollinator garden in that location. That would be cultivating a park which makes no sense at all. It's already a thriving pollinator habitat so don't muck with it. I agree with the idea of the garden in principal just not the location. Please consider moving the proposed garden to the Cove and leaving the Meadows to thrive as is. Thanks for your consideration from a regular parks-user I am writing to you about the above proposed development in the Crippen Park Meadows. This meadow is part of my family history and hopefully many more families to come. It is a wild serene space used and respected by many who enjoy and value it. Words cannot express the beauty inherent in the meadows; you have to be there to feel it. Perturbing the meadows with buildings and raised garden beds or whatever the BAA have decided would be nice, is inherently wrong. Once the meadows are mowed - that is it - no going back. Let us do better for our children and grandchildren, by leaving nature be and putting a stop to this proposed development. Find another area - one that can tap into what would be required infrastructure to run an interpretive center, e.g.: water and power. I categorically say NO to this proposed Pollinator Centre! I d like to express my support for the proposed pollinator demonstration garden in the meadow s of Metro Vancouver s Crippen Regional Park. I think it will enhance the space without taking away 46 Regional Parks Committee 111

112 from its current use (dog-walkers, runners, horseback riders, Ultimate players, etc.) I also believe it will help Bowen Islanders deepen their understanding of local history and the need for more pollinators in our region and elsewhere. Thank you for your support! I am a longtime Bowen Island resident and I fully support the proposed Pollinator Demonstration Garden as it is, in its proposed location. I signed the Change.org petition against the garden by accident, because I mistook it for a document supporting the current proposal in its entirety. That's my bad. I'm working on an "unsign" option, but sadly it's not quite as simple as an "unlike" on social media. I reiterate, I am fully in favour of a pollinator demonstration garden in the Killarney meadow on Bowen Island, and I look forward to hearing about the Bowen Island Agricultural Alliance and Metro Vancouver's progress on its development. PS: If you choose to publish or quote my message supporting this project, it would be much appreciated if you would do so anonymously. Please do not ruin the natural beauty of the open meadow in Crippen Park I am writing to express my concern that Parks is planning to place a pollination garden in our beautiful meadow on Bowen Island...deer fencing, signs, gravel paths, and pressure treated lumber are not the same as a sunny open meadow. We are very forested on Bowen Island and it is always a joy to turn a corner and see the meadow. Please do not put the demonstration garden in this location. I am a very frequent user of Crippen Park, having been so for about 20 years. I was most disturbed to learn that a pollinator garden was proposed for the Meadows. A pollinator garden is a good idea elsewhere, but not in the meadows. I am writing to express my support the BAA s proposal for a pollinator garden in Crippen Park on Bowen Island. I attended the meeting, reviewed the proposals and have been keeping up with the sometimes lively discussion on the Phorum, Bowen s informal discussion point. Although the discussion seems dominated by the negative side, these are the usual voices in opposition to change and, somewhat disturbingly, two people at the forefront of the opposition seem to run businesses based on giving tours of the meadow. It would seem that the garden would allow them to expand their offerings. The garden would be an educational addition to the island and the people behind it are typical of those who want to do something to make our home better. I live in the Deep Bay neighbourhood and walk through the meadow several times a week and even cross country ski there when there s snow enough. It would be a great addition and there are so many other paths that to object to this small slice is somewhat silly. 47 Regional Parks Committee 112

113 We want to voice our concern about the proposed demonstration garden planned for Crippen Park Killarney Meadow on Bowen Island. We do not agree with these plans and we would like to see this garden relocated to another more appropriate area of Bowen Island. It is important to leave Crippen Park as a beautiful untouched place for generations of people to enjoy in the future. I am totally opposed to a pollinator garden in the Crippen Park Killarney Meadows on Bowen Island. This garden should NOT be located in Crippen Park but located elsewhere on Bowen Island. We are residents of Bowen Island and we are writing in support of the proposed Killarney Meadows Garden A Pollinator Initiative & Demonstration Garden. We have participated in the conversations and are very excited to see this through. I think that this garden area would be a great addition to the meadows area. We need to preserve the serene stillness of the Killarney Meadow The serene stillness of the Killarney meadow is priceless and irreplaceable, as there is nothing more precious than experiences of complete peacefulness in our lives. I wrote this poem while sitting on a bench in the meadow on a Summer day, long before the issue of a pollinator demonstration garden was discussed within the community. My experience on that sunny day emphasized the importance of keeping the meadow in its serene state of stillness by simply letting it be. After listening to, reading and considering the comments made by Bowen Islanders on the proposed demonstration garden in Killarney Meadows, I would like to send my SUPPORT for the initiative. I believe that the garden will provide great educational value for park visitors and Bowen residents alike. I also believe that the creation of and continuing maintenance of the garden will build community and increase Bowen's knowledge of and support for more food growing initiatives. We greatly respect the goals of Metro in supporting our parks and having education as a top priority. When we learned of the proposed Pollinator Garden in Crippen Park on Bowen Island, we were curious about what this would entail. Looking closely at the plan, we realized that this plan, built in a to-be-former healthy pollinator habitat, would create an artificially-made environment that is meant to replicate a healthy pollinator habitat. 48 Regional Parks Committee 113

114 The value of the meadow area is its natural healthy state that supports wildlife - both plants and animals. It is a place that inspires curiosity, observation and connection to the natural world. No man-made signs and gardens are needed. Please consider moving this project to an area that is in need of healthy pollinator species where the chance for visitor to learn about this is minimal without this man made garden. All this work to create such a garden would be wasted on a population that does not want or need an artificial environment to observe or teach what is already there. Please do NOT build this garden in Crippen Park Meadow. Please consider other areas that are in need of such a garden - either on Bowen or elsewhere in Metro Vancouver. Please don't put the pollinator in Killarney Meadows. The Meadow is a special place for many folks - and one of the most important reasons is simple. This is the only place on Bowen Island that is suitable for small children and families year round. It is safe for children of all ages mostly because it is the only flat land where you can picnic & play, eat, wander, learn to ride a bike, etc without traffic, noise, rocky paths and so much more. Please, please, please don't take that away from families of small children by placing the pollinator there. This meadow has already lost valuable space to a dog park (and dogs roam free all over the trails regardless) - we can't afford even more space for structures and pollinators and risk there being even less safe spaces for families to play year round. Bowen Island is full of rocky beaches, rugged trails and whilst this is great for most able bodied folks, it can be tough on those who can't move about so well. The meadow is so much more special because those who can't walk far (old and young) can enjoy this wonderful space and feel like they are truly outdoors. Not everyone can afford sunny lawns and big gardens on Bowen Island, and the Meadow provides us with the chance to experience that. I support the idea of a pollinator for education and learning purposes, but please don't put it in the Meadow. I have supported and respected BAA for all their hard work, thoughtful consideration, interviews and lost sleep over creating this Pollinator Demo Garden on Bowen. I was at the community information meeting and heard people speak out against the proposed location of the garden. Maybe they are the community members who refused to meet with BAA as they were seeking input when creating this proposal. I don t know. 49 Regional Parks Committee 114

115 I feel that with all this opposition BAA should consider the other sites for placing the garden. On the other hand, the opposition to the site placement may dwindle once the decision has been made for the proposed site and the garden goes in. There is always opposition towards good changes / proposals on Bowen Is. For example, the little turf playing field had huge opposition and it has been used every waking hour of every day. Thank you for all your work as you continue to be involved in this process, I am writing to request that you deny those on Bowen Island requesting to create a large gated garden in the meadow of Crippen Park. That meadow is enjoyed by generations of people on and off Bowen Island and is an integral part of the trails connecting to Killarney Lake. I have lived on Bowen Island for almost twenty years and walk through that meadow daily. I am always surrounded by many others from seniors to mothers and their babies or toddlers to couples and to many visitors to Bowen Island who use the meadow trail for solitude and enjoyment. Allowing the proposed "garden" to be installed will not only destroy the tranquil and beautiful ambiance of the meadow itself but will also destroy the gorgeous wildflowers that already exist in the meadow. This meadow is treasured by thousands of people. Come any day to Bowen Island in the spring and summer months and you will see hundreds of off-island visitors from all over the lower mainland enjoying the delightful solitude of what is known as the Crippen Park meadow. Please, please do not allow a gated garden to be installed in this meadow and encourage the group in question to find a more suitable spot rather than on the walking trails of generations of Bowen Islanders and visitors from across the lower mainland. PLEASE PLEASE do not go forward with this project or find a better location. The meadow is a magical place and it will never be the same after you alter it. My husband and I have been residents of Bowen Island for 22 years. We are very concerned and opposed to the location of the proposed pollinator garden. We do believe this is a great idea for educational reasons but feel it is not the right location. We agree with the letter written by our long term local professional environmental educator, Will Husby, that the current meadow habitat is ideal for native pollinators and needs no improvement. When our sons were young boys, we would walk through that meadow most every day and explore the bugs, bees, snakes, birds, the fish hatchery, the creeks; it was a true education for us all! I have even taught my music classes and early childhood preschool classes in this meadow. The center where I now teach still brings the children to explore this meadow, just the way it is now. We reiterate, that we do think that this pollinator garden is a good idea, just not where the present, functioning very well on its own garden, is located. Thank you for your time. 50 Regional Parks Committee 115

116 I am a full time resident of Bowen Island. Over the years I have watched as Crippen Park has been chipped away. First the Equestrian ring, then the recycling depot, the Off Leash Dog Park and now a Demonstration Garden. I wish to register my opposition to this proposal. The meadow area is one of the few open spaces on Bowen and is a wonderful meeting place for our community. Please take time to truly assess the desires of the majority population before you make a decision in favour of a small special interest group. The dog park has stolen and destroyed an area that was used regularly by every school (preschool to grade 9) as a level playing field and safe outdoor space. It's my understanding that a regional park belongs to everyone. Before development Killarney Meadow was a wet land and now the Beavers are winning the war with park management to return it to that state. There is great education in observation while allowing nature to take its course. Crippen Park and Killarney Meadows specifically is an area known and loved by every Bowen resident. Why is the deadline for the decision to develop a pollinator demonstration garden at this location at the end of this month? I am afraid the answer is that the organization who has developed this plan over the past several years, Bowen Agricultural Alliance, is aware that much of Bowen's community is not in favour of further development of the park. They're best hope of achieving this goal is to push the project through before most people have had time to make their feelings known. As a community we have had less than two months to read, listen and consider what has been presented...and that time was over Christmas. Most people heard about the proposed pollinator garden a few days before the community information meeting and many (including myself) were not able to attend. I understand that there was no clear majority of opinion at that meeting. Surely this indicates that more consideration is needed. I firmly believe that this is exactly how the off leash dog park was obtained. If use monitoring was undertaken for that area I know it would show that only a VERY small percentage of dogs brought to the park use the off leash enclosure. Yet it is now unsuitable for anyone else. Metro Vancouver is responsible for decisions made in Crippen Park. Please give our community time to come to an open agreement before you allow another unwanted development in the most well loved meadow on Bowen. I am very much in favor of the Bowen Island pollinator garden and think it would be a beautiful and instructive addition to the island environment. There are botanical gardens all over the world, in many many communities, and this would be a naturalistic and appropriate garden for all to experience and share. 51 Regional Parks Committee 116

117 A quick note to voice my strong support for the proposed pollinator demo garden, It's a great idea and I find the location perfect. Don't understand why they'd be opposition to such a great project!!! I've recently been made aware of the proposal to build a pollination garden in Crippen Park. I think it's a really cool idea and I love myself a meditative, educational experience. However, those meadows hold a really dear place in my heart. I grew up losing myself and my dogs in those long grasses, getting muddy on the path when I underestimated recent rainfall, and breathing in the beautiful mist in the early hours of the morning. I would sincerely miss the wide open space I've treasured so much if fences and garden beds were to go up. I lived on Bowen for 22 years; from birth to completion of university. I now live in Vancouver but I visit at least once a month and I never miss an opportunity to walk through the meadows. I hope to take my children there someday. I know my personal feelings aren't the strongest of arguments, but I had to make my thoughts known. I hope you'll all consider alternate locations thoroughly. I spent many happy summers on Bowen Island in my childhood. My family visited often from Vancouver at all times of year. The Meadows was and remains a favourite place, one of my landscapes of inspiration which led me to the field of horticulture and landscape architecture. The Bowen Agricultural Alliance's proposal to build a demonstration pollination garden is a project I can support. But NOT in the Meadows As we lose pollinators in the wild it is critical to educate people about why they are vital to the health of our ecosystems and agricultural crops. But this should not be done by compromising an already healthy, functioning pollinator ecosystem in order to illustrate how valuable it is. This is simply hubris. Mother Nature is already doing a wonderful job of demonstrating pollinator activity in the meadows. We only need to recognize it. If more education is needed in order to understand this, those educational opportunities can be built in Snug Cove where more people have access and where there is electricity and water if needed. This is a worthy idea, but the Meadows is not the site for it. Let's leave them undisturbed. What a great initiative. Would be an asset to have this in the meadows, 52 Regional Parks Committee 117

118 Good luck with the project as Bowen has many folks that love to complain and put a stop to any changes. As a master gardener and owner of the largest organic farm on the Island, I am in full support. Although I support the idea of pollinator demonstrations taking place on Bowen, it is my hope that the initiators of this project and Metro Parks will consider developing it somewhere else than the Meadows of Crippen Park. The Meadows is a unique part of the Park. Certainly it was man-made. My father James Collins was one of the crew who were given the contract in c1903 to clear the land for a pasture. The Terminal Steamship Company had a herd of cows which needed to graze. The cows were held in a large barn which was on the west side of what is now known as Lenora Rd. Every day they were driven west on the Killarney lake road to the Meadows and then back home at night. Both the Terminal and U.S.S. Steamship Companies used the Meadows for grazing and hay for the winter. Neither of them grew vegetables there, but in a large garden close to their barn and nearer to their store and hotel. They also had pigs and chickens in that area. Fruit from their many apple trees was also harvested here. Having a large garden close to a good supply of fertilizer shows that they were serious about farming. The Meadows, as it has been named, is a unique part of the Park for quiet contemplative walks, all leading to natural and easy walking trails beyond. I would like to see it left with no further disturbance. The fenced off dog area, the horse-riders area and the re-cycling depot have been given. Let s leave the rest of the Meadows protected for everyone including the surrounding wild life. I suggest as another choice, what used to be U.S.S. Co. #5 Playground, the area between the Festival Field and the Ball field? Close to the Cove and easy to find. An area that may have been used by William Davies to grow his wealth of vegetables. He was a very early successful gardener. Regarding the public meeting on Bowen concerning the demo garden at the meadow, I would like record some additional comments to my previous on November 29. I would also like to apologize for my rather abrupt comment which I made when the last of the B.A.A. speakers was concluding her address. She made use of a photo in Bowen Island by Irene Howard, which may have justified her assumption that Joseph Mannion's house was situated in the Meadow. I don't believe that Mannion had any involvement in the Meadow or the Farm. When he left, the house stayed in its original place facing Deep Bay, then was incorporated by Cates, into the back of what became the Terminal Hotel. Irene Howard's book has some interesting and very useful Bowen history owing to her excellent research for much of it. Some of her comments re the early days of the Terminal and U.S.S. companies seem to have lacked a credible source. Information from my parents, my older siblings and my own life on this island has given me confidence to comment on that part of Bowen's history. 53 Regional Parks Committee 118

119 I support the need to consider leaving the Meadow with no additional activity except as now - a peaceful place for humans and wildlife. The meadow is included in zone 5 for the Christmas Bird Count. I was involved in the count for zone 5, from 1987 to During that time, I can remember the Meadow area as one which held many varieties of birds: Pacific Wrens (many if these living in the grass tufts); Woodpeckers (Pileated, Hairy, Downy, Red Breasted Sapsucker, Northern Flicker); Mallard Ducks & Great Blue Herons (in or by Killarney Creek); Robins (in the alders, depending on the weather); American Dippers in Terminal Creek; Kingfishers; Spotted Towhees, Fox and Song Sparrows in the growth of bushes east of the barn foundation; Occasional sitings: Northern Saw Whet Owl, Red Tailed Hawk and Northern Harrier (the Drone of the Avian world), very likely hoping for a meal of Wrens. Many people have spoken to me and expressed their concern re this proposed additional use of the Meadow. Some are so affected by it, they felt they could not speak at the meeting without becoming too emotional. I think that the Agricultural group should have had some awareness and concern for the number of people who would be disappointed to learn of the BAA and Metro Parks proposal. Its creation came as a surprise to many, so I believe there should have been some effort since 2010, to involve the whole community in the discussions. Having said all that, I commend the people involved for doing so much work on this very valuable concept and getting Metro Parks on side!! - but I hope you find another site. I would like add a couple of comments regarding the site proposed for the Killarney Meadow Gardens. My main concern is the water needed for this project. The creeks from which water would probably be gathered run well in the winter months but there is precious little flow in the summer. And this might well be in conflict with water needed for the Salmon Enhancement program run by the Bowen Fish and Wildlife Club which has been running for over a decade. It would be appalling if there was neither enough water for either fish or plants. There is a crucial concern. Secondly, Bowen has very little open areas, one being the Festival field. The second is the meadow in question. To reduce its wildness in size would be a great loss. I am just one of many who visit the Meadow on a daily basis and would hate to see it reduced in size. I wish the garden success but would much prefer an alternative location. I am writing to express my support for the small pollinators garden in Killarney Meadows on Bowen Island. I think that this is a great location. I am a resident of Bowen Island and would like to express my concern around the location of Bowen Agricultural Alliance s proposal for a demo garden in the Meadows of Crippen Park. My husband and I moved to Bowen in 2011 and live not far from the Meadow. We are avid gardeners and nature lovers, and though we support the BAA s idea of establishing a pollinator 54 Regional Parks Committee 119

120 garden on the island, we are strongly opposed to setting it up in the Meadow. We are not biologists, but from a layperson s perspective that there is something precious and rare in the raw unadulterated beauty of the Meadow that would be completely destroyed with the installation of a garden and deer fence this size. The Meadow is a relic in our day and age. It is one thing to protect acres of forest in a parkland, but so incredibly unique to have a wide open grass field that remains untouched. When we first came to Bowen and walked through it, we couldn t believe how magical it was and are so lucky to be reminded of what the earth looks like when it is left in its complete natural state. We are not anti-development by any means, and would completely support this project in a different less-destructive location. But please leave the Meadow alone! We now have a 2 year old son and I hope he will able to experience the raw untouched beauty of this small piece of land when he is old enough to realize how rare it actually is. The location of the iconic meadows is Not an appropriate location for which to introduce a project of this nature. We currently have an abundance of natural pollination occurring within these meadow grounds. Perhaps a handful of minimal kiosks would be proportionately more appropriate disbursed within the area as an educational tool. Though I am in support of this initiative by the Bowen Agricultural Alliance I cannot support their proposed location. Please adhere to Metro Vancouver's Ecological Health Action Plan and protect the native pollinator habitat. I'd like to express my disagreement with the plans to have a pollinator garden in the Meadows on Bowen Island, where I live. I have no problem with the garden, and would love to see it situated elsewhere on Bowen, perhaps in Snug Cove, but the Meadows are akin to a cathedral in their peacefulness, and I believe, like many other Bowen Islanders, that having more human-built structures takes away from that in a serious way. There are few if any other open natural areas like the Meadows on Bowen, where human structures are few, and where people can go to enjoy the quiet visual peacefulness of nature. I am writing in response to the Pollinator Garden initiative proposed for Bowen Island. Since there has been some confusion on this issue, Bowen Heritage wishes to make it clear that the board has not endorsed the BAA project, and would not seek to do so, as it is not a 'heritage' project, nor within our heritage 'precinct', and therefore not really within the purview of our society. However, we can offer this comment concerning the Davies Orchard, and hope that it is helpful: We note that in their recent service review, Regional Parks determined that their priorities are primarily, natural area protection and passive outdoor recreation. The Pollinator Garden project is 55 Regional Parks Committee 120

121 currently proposed for a largely undeveloped area, and we understand this will give Regional Parks significant pause. For our part we would be very pleased to consider a similar project within the Davies Orchard area. It would be entirely compatible with our existing heritage gardening, pollinator and orcharding activities that we have been undertaking for many years. We imagine that the proposed project could increase use of the area, community engagement, further our interpretive goals, as well as attracting possible funding and help. Further, locating the project in the Davies Orchard would present no conflict with Regional Parks' habitat preservation mandate, since the area already has significant development, in park terms, and is not a 'natural area'. It also has sun, water, drainage, access to washrooms, refreshments, potentially a ready built interpretive centre, in terms of a renovate-able cottage, and is very close to the ferry as well as island schools and preschools. I frequently walk in the Killarney meadow with or without a dog and benefit from the tranquility and solitude that it offers. There is already a dog park, horse riding area, fish hatchery and recycling centre in the overall area, and some members of the community already feel that the fenced dog park impinges upon the character of the meadow in that particular area. While the dog park is not as visible from the main portion of the meadow, that would not be the case with the proposed pollinator demonstration garden. For a substantial number of islanders, the proposed garden - from a visual point of view and the added level of human activity - is the straw that breaks the camel's back in terms of impinging upon the very sensitive nature of the immensely serene and peaceful experience of simply being in that meadow - a priceless place where we can experience the stillness of nature around us and within us. Please make no further changes to that wonderful area. What is more important than such a rare experience in the increasingly hectic world in which we live? Isn't that what parks are all about? I am writing to let you know that our family is against the building of a pollinator garden in the Meadows on Crippen Park. It should be done in a different place on the Island. Please do not disturb the ecosystem in the Meadows! I am writing to support the Pollinator Initiative in Crippen Park on Bowen Island. I am a member of the Board of Directors of the Bowen Island Foundation and our Board has expressed interest in funding this initiative. I became concerned, however, when I began to see some opposition to this project, and claims from self-described local experts that the proposal was likely to produce negative environmental consequences and was to be situated in an inappropriate location. I must confess that I was somewhat skeptical of these claims, however, as many of those in opposition are Bowen Islanders who have traditionally been opposed to virtually all forms of change on our island. 56 Regional Parks Committee 121

122 But I do not have the expertise to be able to choose amongst competing claims and so I sought the advice of two of my faculty colleagues at Simon Fraser, both with significant expertise in this realm. I provided them with a copy of the proposal, and a link to our local Forum, where both proponents and opponents of the project have voiced their views. Mark Winston is a Professor of Biology and one of North America s leading experts on pollination. As SFU s website notes, Winston's work has appeared in numerous books, commentary columns for the Vancouver Sun, The New York Times, The Sciences, Orion magazine, and frequently on CBC radio and television and National Public Radio. His research, communication, and dialogue achievements have been recognized by many awards, including the Manning Award for Innovation, Sterling Prize in Support of Controversy, British Columbia Gold Medal in Science and Engineering, Academic of the Year, Eve Savory Award for Science Communication, Michael Smith Award for Science Promotion, a prestigious Killam Fellowship from the Canada Council, and election as a Fellow in the Royal Society of Canada. He currently is Academic Director of Simon Fraser University's Centre for Dialogue, and a Professor of Biological Sciences. Here is his verbatim response, I've taken a look at the proposal and the comments. Note that I'll be reading/signing my new book "Bee Time: Lessons From the Hive" ( on Bowen Wednesday evening 4 February, at the Rustique Bistro. They are still working out the details, but I imagine it will be advertised soon, and may be of interest to those involved with the proposal (and its opponents). As to the proposal: The issue of native or not, both for bees and habitat, recurs every time a pollinator project is proposed. As I read the proposal, the objective was not to return a tiny portion of Bowen to its original habitat, but rather to promote understanding of the importance of pollination, awareness of wild bees (some of which are native), serve as a resource and inspiration for those interested in local food production, and to some extent increase awareness of what is native and what has been modified. Given the tiny area involved, I don't think the project will have much impact in restoring Bowen to some earlier form (and there will always be arguments about how far back does "native" become operative). With that in mind, and with respect to the concerns of a few, I think this is an excellent proposal that would add an important element to the park and provide many useful messages and experiences to visitors. I would support proceeding as planned, and perhaps rather than rejecting the opposition points use the project as a way to highlight this issue of what is native and is not as a component. In terms of details as to what to plant, Elizabeth Elle from SFU Biological Sciences is more of a wild bee expert than I (internationally recognized, actually), and has done quite a bit of local work on wild bees. She would be an excellent person to consult about what to plant and how to promote nesting sites for wild bees. She's also quite conversant in the issue of wild vs. native. Hope that helps. Let me know if you need any further feedback. (I might add that Professor Elizabeth Elle has already given her support for this initiative). 57 Regional Parks Committee 122

123 Professor Gail Anderson received a B.Sc. in Zoology from Manchester University and a M.Sc. and Ph.D. in Pest Management from Simon Fraser University. Her major research interests are in insect and other arthropod-borne diseases in man and animals, in particular the pest management aspects, and in forensic entomology, the use of insects in death investigation. She has gained international recognition for her pioneering work in the field of medico-legal entomology. She actively handles forensic death cases, particularly homicide cases, for the B.C. Coroner's Service, the RCMP, and city police, using insects to determine elapsed time since death, information frequently vital to the successful resolution of murder cases. Dr. Anderson is the only full-time forensic entomologist in Canada. Her work has been featured on several television programs, including ``Journeys - Grave Testimony'' first shown on the Discovery Channel, ``Forbidden Places - Silent Witness'' also first shown on the Discovery Channel, and ``The Nature of Things - Postmortem,'' as well as several other programs. She was awarded the Simon Fraser University Alumni Association Outstanding Alumni Award for Academic Achievement in Her verbatim response follows, Mark would be the one to know - he is the pollinator expert. To me it seems a no brainer - increasing native pollinators is always a great idea - we are all being encouraged to do this. If the proposal was to release a bunch of non-natives it would be very different but this seems to just be a general improvement of an area and designed to attract and educate people and kids. As is mentioned repeatedly, this is hardly an old growth area - it was a farm and is now an abandoned farm so they wish to improve it and improve the park generally which sounds as though it could be a lovely area but has a very low ranking. I get the impression that there are a few people who feel very passionately about 'no change' which is sometimes good, but in this case, the area has already been 'changed' repeatedly and this seems an attempt to improve it and actually demonstrate the agricultural use the land was put to in the past as well as increase the general health of the areas by simply encouraging native pollinators and hence wildlflowers, berries etc, which will improve bird sites and animal foraging and generally make the place healthier. In sum, the best available evidence from those with relevant expertise suggests that this is a wonderful initiative and one that should be strongly supported by Metro Vancouver. I very much appreciate the responses of my colleagues at Simon Fraser University and the opportunity to comment on this issue. Not in favour of using the meadow. Please reconsider your location. I am writing to express my views on the proposed initiative to create a pollinator garden in the Meadows of Crippen Park, on Bowen Island, brought forward by the Bowen Agricultural Alliance. While I support the project to create such a garden, I strongly oppose and protest the choice of location for this garden. In other words, I would like to see the project move ahead, but in another location. 58 Regional Parks Committee 123

124 I do not understand how destroying an area where natural pollinators are already found, in an open, inviting space that is frequented by island residents and visitors who enjoy the meadow as is, and replacing it with a fenced, artificial garden with raised beds, is supposed to be a good thing to do. Are we trying to, once again, to demonstrate the ability of humans to damage nature in trying to control it? Are we trying to reduce the limited open space available on Bowen Island? Taking this particular area of Crippen Park, and introducing yet more artificial structures surrounded by a fence seems to me to be particularly short-sighted and completely out of synch with the values of island residents. I also protest that the community at large has had very little opportunity to comment on the proposed location, even though this project has been said to have been in the works for 5 years. One public meeting has been held, but at the busiest time of the year, right before Christmas And now the public is, essentially, faced with an deadline for comment with much too little possibility for thoughtful discussion on the merits of the proposal and possible alternative locations. I hope that, if this initiative proceeds, the garden will be established in a location other than the Meadows. Hello I am a resident of Bowen Island and I want to ask that Metro parks consider a new location for the pollinator garden. I love the idea of a pollinator garden - in fact I am a member of the Agriculture Alliance and I have been supporting the idea of the project but when I learned of the location and learned that planting non-native plants and inviting non- native pollinators will upset the balance of the ecosystem, I decided that the project is much better off in a different location. I also know that many islanders are opposed of the location because the meadow is special to them as it is - wild and "untouched". I am hopeful that we can work together to create a wonderful educational garden in a special location but I am sure it won't be supported by many islanders if it goes in the meadow. Thanks for your time and consideration We are Bowen residents, gardeners and amateur naturalists. We have made provision in our garden for mason bees and have built a larger Insect House for a greater variety of insects to use. We also grow a lot of lavender which we understand will be one of the plants used in the pollen garden. Lavender self-seeds and we keep a close watch to see that lavender (and any other of our plants) does not escape into the wild. We consider this garden is a good idea but in the wrong place; such a garden is not appropriate for Crippen Park. Please keep it as wild as possible. In the 11 years we ve lived on Bowen, we ve seen many invasive plants take hold across the island and have spent (along with others) much time trying to control the spread. However, with little help or support (from the Municipality or yourselves) this is indeed an uphill battle of which many islanders seem oblivious. We would like Metro Parks to put more effort into removing invasives such as Burdock, Japanese Knotweed, Clematis and Daphne laureola. 59 Regional Parks Committee 124

125 I am writing to support the idea and the plan for the demonstration pollinator garden project in the Crippen Park /Killarney meadow on Bowen Island. I believe this project would benefit the community and those interested in learning about agriculture and pollinators and would be a delightful area to view and wander through. The location seems good and the proximity to the schools and the developed commercial area will likely entice both students and tourists to the garden should the project go ahead. As a Bowen resident over the last 20 years I can tell you there is no more special place on the island for residents and visitors alike than the gorgeous meadow in Crippen Park. This open pastoral foundational place would not be a good place for a demonstration garden. I am an avid gardener and parent yet I am strongly opposed to disrupting this gorgeous open vista from a biological, educational and aesthetically visual perspective. It doesn't make sense. There is much to be learned from what happens in a magical meadow. It's a gentle powerful teacher. The green education I've seen hundreds of kids experience chasing snakes, savouring blackberries, listening to the alders, frolicking amongst buttercups with romping dogs - that is rare! I know my plea is an emotional one - but it really counts. This is an accessible, semi wild, meditative play place. Open feeling= Open hearts. On an island where towering trees can isolate the meadow is a critical natural social meeting place. Generations of kids and parents and elders frequent the meadow as ritual as it represents a rare, bright and wild quality. The essence of it would be distorted by deer fences and raised beds. Keep it pastoral...pretty please Thank you for an excellent presentation tonight. Although I support the idea of an educational pollinator garden, I cannot support the present location in the meadow at Crippen Park. The location is not suitable for this kind of activity. Please consider another spot - Davies Orchard seems the most likely as it is convenient, has good visibility, and plenty of sun exposure. Unlike the meadow, there is water availability and better drainage. I would like to voice my opposition to putting a demonstration garden in Killarney Meadows or what is locally referred to as "the meadow". I walk through the meadow from 3-5 times a weekoften with my daughter and or a group of her young friends. It is one of our favorite places to see the change of seasons with the wildlife, trees and grasses. My daughter loves running through the grass looking for snakes, birds and field mice. We feel that any cultivation of the meadow would seriously detract from our experience. I applaud the Bowen Agricultural Alliance for the work that they have done on this project but I think that the upper bowfest field might be a much better location. 60 Regional Parks Committee 125

126 We already have a cut grass area, a paddock and a dog park in the meadow - please leave the rest of the meadow free of development/ cultivation. I have given considerable thought to the merits/downsides of this proposal, and bring perspectives gleaned from having sat on the Metro Vancouver Board and Parks/Environment committees. 1. This is an excellent idea, something that will potentially create 'value' for Crippen Park visitors and the Metro Parks brand. There have been lots of successful examples of partnerships in Metro Van. Parks- eg the rowing facility at Deas, the salmonid enhancement improvements at Colony. 2. The proposed location is highly controversial. I sense that on Bowen, everything is that way, but there are enflamed passions around this that amount to proxy battles about 'development' vs 'natural state' on any number of fronts. The plusses of the location are obvious-sunny, good soil, accessible and visible, flat, in ALR. The down sides are the distance and expense to provide water and power, the need for periodic vehicular access for bringing in materials, including soil amendments. Visual intrusion and diminishment of 'natural beauty'. The loss of 'old field' habitat is considerable, but not, for me, excessive. What strikes me most are the emotional attachments to positions. Some highly value the quiet and open visual landscape. They resent, for example the loss of such space for the dog enclosure. Others want more activities. Metro Vancouver Parks need to articulate a good rationale for whatever decision is made. Perhaps establish limits to loss of 'natural habitat' (not globally, but referencing the meadow area in particular). 3. The track record for such projects is mixed on Bowen. While the Fish Hatchery and Memorial Garden are still going strong, the use of the BIHORA ring has diminished quite steadily, such that it appears to be in organized use only a couple? of times a year, with very few individuals riding horses there at other times. The condition of fencing has deteriorated. The Bike Park was dismantled after similar deterioration and low usage rates. Outside the Park, the Outdoor Learning Centre at BICS (Community school) has hardly been used, though there is now construction of what appears to be some raised beds that may attract more interest. One of the stated goals of the pollinator garden project has been education, particularly of children, and it is odd to me that better use is not made of an existing facility. 4.There is no funding in place, and the projected costs will be high- for construction, maintenance, but most of all, for ongoing management. The proponents have not provided budget estimates. An earlier proposal for a community garden at Cates Hill municipal Park failed to take off, largely because of high projected costs. This.7 acre piece will require more management and funding. My recommendation is to give conditional support to the project, subject to a number of design, siting and performance parameters. 1. Adopt a go-slow approach. Test the assumptions for size, location and planned uses. There is considerable support for a smaller garden located in Davies Orchard, Snug Cove- close to Cove, water and power in place, and existing young orchard that could be inter-planted. 61 Regional Parks Committee 126

127 2. Require a solid business plan, and demand a performance bond. As well, require an operational plan that clearly identifies impacts and timelines. Ensure that nothing gets built until the funding is fully in place and all agreements are properly executed. 3. Provide core/startup funding and technical advice, to both demonstrate substantive support and retain some control. 4. Entrench an evaluation process, to determine progress and measure success. I am sure the agreements for all third-party users are well thought out; the safeguards need to be publicized. I love the idea of a pollinator garden and gardens in general. I would like to see a public garden on Bowen Island, but THIS PROPOSAL IS FOR THE WRONG PLACE. The meadows where the garden is proposed, is a much-treasured, open, un-treed space, which is rare on Bowen. I also understand that there are pollinators in the area which, ironically, may be threatened by converting part of the meadows to a garden. I would support such a project elsewhere on the island, and I suggest that there are parts of Crippen Park within the Snug Cove precinct which offer some potential. I'm writing to say I supposed the proposed pollinator garden for Killarney meadows here on Bowen Island. I'm hearing that there have been some vocal detractors so I want to have my voice heard. Quite frankly think those opposed to the garden have no vision and can't see how it will add beautiful flowers, very much needed for bees, educational opportunities for our children, more knowledge about the history of Bowen, and a chance to grow a little food. Probably grumps who admittedly enjoy the meadow but can't let a little bit of the space (it is a big space) go to meet the community objectives of an organization they probably aren't involved it. They want it all to themselves as probably feel it will ruin it when the opposite is true - it will just add to the vibrancy and joy of the park. Please allow Bowen Agricultural Alliance to create their pollinator project! It is a worthy project - don't let the short sighted grumps who will totally love it after it s built but can't handle change get in the way! Not in favour of using the meadow. Please reconsider your location. I was very pleased to read in today's Bowen Island Undercurrent about the BAA/Metro joint venture concept of the pollinator garden in the meadow, and particularly in the area of the old dairy barn ruins. 62 Regional Parks Committee 127

128 I have often thought that Bowen should get more involved in food production and that the meadows was an under-utilized area. I don't really know about pollinator gardens specifically, but as a retiree turning my own backyard into some sort of sustainable food production system, I am getting wind of a concept called permaculture. Perhaps permaculture practices could be part of this initiative and perhaps further the BAA/Metro joint venture could evolve into an educational facility. I am in favour of this project and the proposed location within the park. The location is a former farm site which was so chosen for sound agricultural reasons; to follow this thinking is reasonable. As a Bowen permanent resident for the past 43 years, I have witnessed much of its growth and development, over recent years. Our rural marine population has grown from some 300 permanent residents in 1972 to over 3500 today. As Bowen's elected Islands Trustee for 2 terms from 1974 to 1978, I contributed to the creation and approval of our first Bowen Island Official Community Plan and supporting Land Use By-Laws. I was also instrumental in the formation of Crippen Park, which is a timeless natural asset to present and future generations. After attending the December 2014, Bowen public meeting with Metro Vancouver Parks and the Bowen Agriculture Alliance (BAA) along with others, I am registering my opposition to the proposal for a fenced pollinator garden to be located on a portion of Crippen Park Meadow. This site should remain in its natural state, undisturbed by a perimeter deer fence and any other land development. This is not an appropriate land use for approximately 25% of Crippen Park Meadow. Will Husby who spoke convincingly at that meeting along with Dave MacIntosh and many other women and men, have explained that this historic gem of Bowen parkland should never be "improved" with fences and garden structures. It should not be leased and then used as is proposed by the BAA. Mr. Husby has confirmed his opposition in writing and he has my support. Just leave this parkland unimproved and as it is, please. I also respect the opinions of Bowen pioneers Jean Jamieson and her sister Marion Moore. They do not support this proposal. Their father first cleared Crippen Park Meadow for grazing of dairy cows that were supplying milk in the old days of Terminal Farms, Evergreen Lodge Hotel and the Union Steamships. Pollination on Bowen lands is important, however but a demonstration pollinator garden could better be located on an alternative site, either on private agricultural lands or possibly public or crown lands. Nearly one third of Bowen is crown land which was not discussed. Davies Orchard in Snug Cove has been suggested and could be explored as a possibility. In short, none of our treasured Crippen Park Meadows should ever be considered for BAA's demonstration pollinator garden. 63 Regional Parks Committee 128

129 I am a veteran journalist with a background in Environmental Studies, and want tell you that your plan for a garden in our meadow is simply stupid. It's as stupid as the war on drugs, because you are applying the same kind of short-term limited vision. I call it Taliban thinking. Tell your powers that be to take a longer look at the bigger picture. I am totally opposed to the establishment of a demonstration pollinator garden in Crippen Park Killarney Meadows on Bowen Island. This garden should be located elsewhere on Bowen Island and NOT in Crippen Park. I am in opposition to this proposal as I feel it will destroy the beauty of the meadow and restrict its use by all visitors. Please do not proceed with this proposal. I would like to voice my opposition to the proposed pollinator demonstration garden in the Meadow area of Crippen Park. I do support this initiative, but believe it should be situated in a different area. The attraction of the meadows is its natural state, and the proposed changes would completely alter this. In addition, the proposed area of the demonstration garden is home to the largest population of garter snakes that I've seen on Bowen. These keep the population of invasive European black slug at bay in the Meadows. Please find a different home for this garden - possible in the field between the Bowfest field and the baseball diamond? I am writing to express my strong opposition to the location of a pollinator garden in the Meadows in Crippen Park. This beautiful natural place, enjoyed by islanders of all ages, should not be taken over by this educational initiative. The pollinator garden is a great idea, but this is the wrong place. I am an environmental educator - a professor in Earth Sciences at Stanford University - with a home on Bowen Island. We need to teach, above all, respect for natural places and help children, and adults, develop the ability to observe and learn from the complex workings of the natural world. Please do not interfere with this functioning, healthy, but fragile, natural ecosystem. Human interference with nature should not be the starting point for education. I wrote yesterday to express my opposition to the proposed pollinator garden on Bowen Island. I am now writing to express my high level of concern regarding the process of community consultation. 64 Regional Parks Committee 129

130 I have read reports that claim support for this project from a number of groups on Bowen Island. In the middle of a very packed day at work, I have contacted representatives from 3 of the groups that were listed as supporting the project. In all cases the group had not indicated support. (This is in addition to the Bowen Nature Club and the Garden Club who were initially listed as supportive, when in fact they are not.) In the case of the Community School, the principle made it very clear to me that they did not want to get involved; their expressed interest in the project was simply due to an interest in knowing about any educational initiatives on Bowen Island; they did not indicate support for this specific project. If I had time I would contact all of the groups to determine the true level of support on our island. There has not been a sincere effort to engage the community and most people I speak with, while supportive of the concept, strongly oppose the location in the Meadows. Thanks for your attention to this matter. And a huge thanks for Crippen Park! I am writing to express that I do not like this specific location for this marvelous garden idea. The meadow is a favorite spot for me. The recent addition of a fenced off-leash dog area drastically changed the landscape. I want this area to remain as natural as possible. There are already two man-made destinations - the equestrian ring and off-leash dog area. I think this is crowding too many activities into the meadows. I want some area left for those of us who want to be in a natural area and find some moments of peace and connection without man-made structures / destinations at every turn. There are many other options for this Pollinator Garden that have been suggested - specifically in the parkland in Snug Cove - walking distance for all the schools/students, residents and visitors to access easily. It may seem that there are only a few of us that care so deeply to oppose what is really a good idea (just the location is a poor choice) - but our voices do matter. Please do not approve this location. When the Bowen Agricultural Alliance Society members don t even agree on the need for a pollinator demonstration garden in Crippen Park on Bowen Island I am at a loss to know how this proposal is moving forward. As far as I am aware they only discussed it at a meeting in December and have yet to approach the island populace at large and get feedback. Given the business of the holiday season I would not like to see this proposal pushed through until more people have been informed. And seriously, given the cost of ferry travel is a Bowen Island demonstration garden really going to attract traffic from Vancouver? This is not needed on Bowen. I like the idea of the project of having a pollinator garden on Bowen Island. I am new to the island with a young daughter and I think this would be extremely educational and an asset to our Island. 65 Regional Parks Committee 130

131 Having read the proposal documents for the demonstration pollinator garden proposed for Crippen Park (in the Meadows), I wish you to know that myself and my family strongly feel that this is not a suitable location for such a well-intended endeavor. Here are my comments I wrote when signing the petition to yourselves and BAA: Please consider another space that is already visually impacted and disturbed, not a serene, open meadow-scape. The aesthetic alone will be hard to swallow in a space people seek out to get away from built environments. Long term viability: who will fund and maintain this on Metro land in decades to come? Less human disturbance and interference there will ultimately be more beneficial to the existing native pollinators. Team up with BICS and their new garden on the Snake Field or the Community Garden behind the Seabreeze in the cove? These meadows must be left as is. The insects, etc do their work there, also deer and other creatures I lived on Bowen from 1974 until 2006 and at that time the walk to the Meadows and over the creek with my then 3 year old son and for years after was a happy and peaceful time for us. We would pick huckleberries, salmon berries, blackberries for a snack and for jam making Lots of pollinating going on there then and now also there are Oregon grape and salal berries for pollination The Meadows were a play area for my son, myself and friends it was/is an open area that afforded a sense of freedom free and wild it must be left like this it IS Bowen Island. I am writing to express my strong opposition to the Bowen Agricultural Alliance's proposed Demonstration Garden in Crippen Regional Park on Bowen Island. I lived on Bowen approximately seven years, until October of last year. I am presently living in Victoria, but plan to return to Bowen later this year or the year after. During my years on Bowen, I was a regular user of Crippen Park, walking or running around the lake almost every day. The Demonstration Garden is a nice idea with good intentions behind it, but this is the wrong place for it. The Meadow in Crippen Park is a beautiful natural environment and should be kept that way. It is habitat for deer and undoubtedly many other small animals residing in the long grass that grows up in the summer. There are also beaver living in the creek that passes through the meadow near the trail to the lake. Owls live all through the park, but especially in the valley area where the creek runs from the dam at the end of the lake down to the meadow area. Devoting a large part of the meadow to cultivation of a garden will introduce increased human presence and noise that will degrade the environment. I am so sad that this idea is being considered. I want to add that I have been generally very disappointed with Metro Vancouver's management of the park, which seems insensitive to local concerns and realities. A particular example is the offleash dog area in the meadow. This was (and is) a terrible idea. As I understand it, the rationale was that this would be a trade-off for enforcement of the on-leash rule elsewhere in the park, yet in fact it has remained the case that there is zero enforcement of the on-lease requirement. Every day I walked or ran around Killarney Lake, I would encounter people with unleashed dogs. If Metro Vancouver is not going to seriously enforce the on-leash rule elsewhere, then it needs to get rid of the fenced area. I really don't understand the concern with dogs being off-leash on the trails 66 Regional Parks Committee 131

132 anyway - I never saw any danger from it, although I was one of the people potentially affected as a runner and non-dog owner. The fenced area in the meadow for dogs to run unleashed is a complete waste of space - I have never seen anyone use it - and, again, a degradation of the habitat that should be preserved for wild animals in the park. The fence and the regular mowing of the grass within the area degrade the area as habitat for deer and other animals. I am writing on behalf of my small family of three including myself, my husband, and 15-month old daughter to express our support for the Pollinator Demo Garden in the Killarney Meadows on Bowen Island. We are very much in support of this project because we feel it will offer another amenity for children on the island and there is a big, always growing community of children here! We feel the project is in keeping with the feeling of Bowen Island, and appreciate its historical twist echoing the former use of the meadows in years gone by. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have need for more information regarding our support of this initiative! I would like to voice my support of the initiative to create a Demonstration Polinater Garden in Crippen Park on Bowen Island. I attended the recent information meeting and was impressed with the project and know those involved to be extremely capable, passionate and knowledgable. It is critical in these times to connect ourselves to the delicate balance that allows life and our food chain to thrive on the planet. This is the voice of pragmatist, not a hippy! We are very fortunate to have islanders amongst us who are passionate about supporting the education of children and adults and creating sustainable food sources on our own turf. Though I would have preferred to see it in the area of the off leash dog park for better sun, soil, and less impactful on the main walking area, I'm sure that has been considered and there are reasons why that was not an option. It is human nature to be resistant to change so there will undoubtedly be objections, but I urge Metro Vancouver to make a courageous choice in favour of considerations that are more important than the desire of a few to have things remain untouched. Personally, I have been walking through that park almost daily for 21 years and trust the project managers to create something of which Bowen Islanders and Metro Vancouver will be very proud. Thank you for your time, and your impressive involvement and support of the parks on Bowen Island. I am writing to express my opposition to locating the Pollinator Demonstration Garden in the Killarney Meadows on Bowen Island. Please do not put it in this location!! 67 Regional Parks Committee 132

133 Like many of the others opposing this location, I believe a garden like this could be a lovely, interesting and educational addition to the island, but do not feel the meadows are the appropriate place. It is a very "developed" type of facility and belongs in a more developed area of the park - somewhere in Snug Cove amongst the old orchard seems to be a more logical place. As a previous long term (20+ years) resident of Bowen Island I feel very strongly that the natural unstructured integrity of the meadows should be maintained. In my recent visits to the island I have been disappointed to observe the encroaching "human controlled" changes being made to the meadows with the enlarged areas of mowed "lawn". What a shame to see loss of habitat for all the small creatures and insects that live amongst the protective grasses and other small meadow plants. In recent years the beavers have moved into the area and as a now infrequent visitor I am so impressed with how their activities are changing the landscape. Perhaps some interpretive signs regarding their work would be a better "educational" opportunity. Please let nature and its creatures be the landscape architects in the meadows and find another location for this very structured, manipulated and unnatural garden. While the proposal for a "Pollinator Demonstration Garden" with promotion of learning about the pollination work of native insects, birds and wildlife on Bowen Island has great potential, I feel that it would be more appropriate to consider a different location. The Meadows in Crippen Park is a unique, natural, and peaceful environment offering wonderful changes through the seasons and weather systems. Walking, jogging and cycling through the meadows is enjoyed by Bowen residents and visitors alike. The basically flat terrain facilitates those for whom steeper and rugged terrain is not possible. Time spent in the meadows is great for the body and soul. It would be sad to have this diminish or disappear. One has to mention the amazing spiders that weave their lacelike webs among the grasses. This project, situated at another location, easily accessible from the ferry, conveniently provided with food and beverage outlets and close to "Events" activities, would have potential for increased participation, enjoyment, and learning. Over the past 3 days we have been able enjoy the beautiful Bowen meadows with our 3 preschool classes. That s 52 children who could explore the area, run in wide open space, enjoy and discover with wonder and have a picnic with friends. We were lucky this month to have such beautiful weather! We take the preschool children monthly, all school year and also for summer camps into the meadows to play in its beautiful nature. The trail systems that run behind our little school lead safely to the meadows and a cross walk has been painted for us, so that we can cross into the meadows safely with our classes of 3-5 year olds. 68 Regional Parks Committee 133

134 To build or change the meadows would be heartbreaking for all of us that use the area regularly. Surely there are other areas for the pollination gardens to be built. A ask you on behalf of all our young preschoolers and children on the island to please leave the meadows a beautiful and natural area! I am in strong support of the pollinator demonstration garden on Bowen Island! We had two meadows (only) on this island. The first one has been completely ruined by the offleash dog area - I am a dog owner by the way. And now the proposal is to eat into the other one. This island is very short of flat green space in its natural state and we cherish what little we have left. Great idea to have a garden; bad idea to have it in the meadows. I am a resident of Bowen Island and a certified Master Gardener with more than 40 years of gardening experience. I want to say how pleased I am that BAA and GVRD have partnered on this project. I am in complete support of the project in concept, and 100 percent opposed to locating it in the meadow. What a brilliant idea to locate it in the old Davies Orchard, closer to the Cove where visitors and locals can easily access the site! Such a project would seed a renewal of interest in the heritage orchard and in the rehabilitation of the cottages. There are organizations on Bowen that would lend a hand, and many people who expressed concern about the location but are in favor of the project have said they would be available to help raise funds, build, and plant. For ongoing maintenance of the pollinator demonstration garden, I think it is really important to ensure - from the start - that there is a broad base of support in the community, not just a handful of enthusiastic proponents. When I met recently in West Van with other Vancouver Master Gardeners, I met a woman who enthusiastically expressed interest in fundraising for the rehabilitation of the orchard. What a perfect marriage of interests and benefits! Plus, rather than re-arranging nature in the meadow, we would be restoring an area that has historical significance and is in dire need of rehabilitation. Thank you for the opportunity to express my opinion and for the interest and support in Bowen Island's pollinator project, located in Davies Orchard in Snug Cove. I have read the arguments about the location of the natural pollinators demonstration garden on Bowen Island. I applaud the idea very strongly, but I oppose the proposed location at least equally strongly. 69 Regional Parks Committee 134

135 Killarney Meadows is a place of utter tranquillity and the introduction of fences, a locked enclosure, raised beds and a pergola would change it utterly. I am very impressed by the ecological arguments presented by Will Husby in his submission on this topic and am persuaded by them. I also think it would be much more effective, and would fulfill your mandate much better, to locate the demonstration garden in or closer to Snug Cove. I hope this will be possible. I would greatly grieve the loss of the part of the meadows identified for the garden development. It is not in keeping with the 'feel' of the place. I attended your community information meeting on December 9, 2014 and would like to comment on the proposal by Bowen Agricultural Alliance (BAA) to establish a pollinator demonstration garden in that part of Crippen Park known as Killarney Meadows. I am a member of BAA and a garden enthusiast, but I am against this proposal. In principle, I do support the notion of a pollinator garden on Bowen Island if a suitable location can be found, but I believe that Killarney Meadows is the wrong place for such an initiative. I think it is entirely inappropriate for one of the few remaining wilder parts of Crippen Park to be tamed in such a way, especially when it seems likely that this proposal will lead to a significant net loss in pollinator habitat. I believe this plan has been brought to you for consideration by a small group of the population, which has unfortunately done inadequate public consultation before approaching you. I heard a great deal at the public meeting in December, and have learned more since the meeting in conversation and discussion via the community s online forum, to suggest to me that many people on the island - for a range of environmental, aesthetic and habitat reasons - are against this proposed use of Killarney Meadows. I have the strong sense, however, that the creation of a pollinator garden would receive broad public support if it was established elsewhere in Snug Cove within Crippen Park, perhaps in combination with the Davies Orchard Heritage Demonstration Garden behind Cottage 20. From a practical, gardening perspective, I also believe that the proposed location offers insufficient water to sustain the planned garden and that the planting proposed will not flourish in the light and soil conditions that prevail in this part of the Park. Re-locating to another spot in Snug Cove might overcome these deficiencies and improve the opportunity for greater numbers of visitors, school children and locals to enjoy all the benefits of a pollinator garden. I am writing to ask you to please consider a different location for the proposed pollinator demonstration garden on Bowen Island. Ideally a space which has already been heavily disturbed by human interference, such as the areas near the heritage cottages in the Cove, where Bowen celebrates her annual Apple Festival (would be perfect in conjunction with a demonstration garden), or perhaps the so-called Snake Field next to the Bowen Island Community School. 70 Regional Parks Committee 135

136 It would be so very sad to lose the beautiful, natural character of the Killarney Meadows, and it would be a terrible loss if the habitat of the meadows' current pollinators and naturally-occuring pollinator attractors were to be destroyed. Which "expert" do we believe? In one corner we have twenty year island resident, Will Husby, with impeccable credentials and an intimate knowledge of the meadows. In the other, we have two SFU professors with equally impressive credentials recruited by project supporter, Dr. Neil Boyd. The scope of SFU professors examination of the project was limited to the information provided by Dr. Boyd which may or may not have included all pertinent information, SUCH AS OTHER POSSIBLE LOCATIONS OR SITE CONSTRAINTS. Have these professors even visited the proposed site? Has anyone seen their report or are we expected to rely on what was written by Dr. Boyd. The SFU professors failed to address the true crux of the issue. On this island, you would be hard pressed to find anyone against the "pollinator garden", but those against the proposed location are as plentiful as BC Ferries critics. The professors have not addressed the site limitations such as a dependable source of water for irrigation during the growing season, that soil will have to be trucked from the mainland increasing our already high carbon footprint, and that the area is currently used as a hibernaculum for a portion of the islands garter snake population. The proposed area is the prime part of the meadows and is has been used regularly for years by island residents and visitors alike as it is one of the few FLAT, open sunny areas on the island. Changing its use to a pollinator garden would be a travesty. I would like to add my voice to the supporters of the Bowen Pollinators project. I think it oils be a great thing for our Island and for the entire Region. I just wanted to express my support for a pollinator garden in the meadow on Bowen Island. I agree with the proposal that the site would be enhanced by such a garden, the educational opportunities would be wonderful for all of the schools on Bowen, and it's a great example for other communities. It's a great cause and we hope it can be seen through. I would like to register my support for the above proposal on Bowen. As a Registered Professional Biologist and former Director of the BC Association of Professional Biologists, I recognize the importance of creating these educational and ecological opportunities. As a Bowen Island resident, I believe the location proposed is ideal as it is a brownfield area and easily accessible by everyone including those with mobility problems. I would note however there is an abundance of garter snakes in the area; likely using the old foundations for cover and/or hibernacula. Development of this area should include perhaps creation of alternative cover habitat (e.g. rock piles) and transplantation of the garter snakes, if possible. 71 Regional Parks Committee 136

137 I also believe this type of initiative fits into the character and Official Community Plan vison of Bowen Island to encourage environmental stewardship and tourism. As this will help boost much needed tourism to Bowen Island and I would encourage Metro Vancouver Parks to help advertise this attraction with new signage, brochures etc. and perhaps an expanded parking area near the Bowen Island Recycling Centre. Our only question relates to your water source. I believe the line to the horse facility in the Meadow comes from the Terminal Creek Salmon Hatchery, which is owned by Metro Vancouver and operated by the Bowen Island Fish & Wildlife Club under the guidance of DFO. Adequate water is crucial while we incubate eggs and raise fry. However, all the fry are released by early June and the hatchery does not operate during the summer and early fall (we shut off the water to the hatchery between approximately June 15 to October 15). I notice your plan is to collect rainwater as well as use the horse facility line. When would you be using the line? How much water would you require? I believe your project would be good for Metro Vancouver Parks and good for the community of Bowen Island. I don t think this will create a problem but the Agricultural Alliance Society, the BIFWC, and Metro Vancouver Parks should discuss and resolve any water issues before final approval. I fully support the Bowen Agricultural Alliance Society's proposal for a native pollinators demonstration garden and agricultural education centre in Killarney Meadows in Crippen Park. The location is central to educational, historical and community uses and will serve to enhance these uses. I have served as a municipal councillor, president of the chamber of commerce and municipal representative to our Parks, Trails and Greenway Committee and our Economic Development Committee, and am very aware of the importance of Crippen Park and Killarney Meadows to our community. Locating the proposed pollinator demo garden in the Killarney Meadow will enhance the value and appeal of the park to Bowen Islanders and our many visitors from Metro Vancouver. I am writing to express my interest and support for the pollinator garden that is proposed for the Meadows area in Crippen Regional Park. With pollinators negatively impacted by our modern world and its poisons, it is helpful to educate people about the importance of pollinators and how to support this important part of our food chain. Locating it in the old barn foundation sounds like a wonderful use of that remnant from a former time. 72 Regional Parks Committee 137

138 I m writing to you to express my support of the proposed Pollinator Demo Garden in Crippen Park on Bowen Island. I think it s a tremendous use of a small piece of the meadow, and the inspiration of our visitors, the youth in particular, could be awesome. I also think that this use of ALR land is outstanding. It would help the plants, the pollinators, and the overall environment. I m sure that some will want nothing to change, ever, in the meadow. I take a rather holistic approach. Change happens every day. Trees grow, mature, rot and fall. Alas, so do people. :-) So to me, it s about stewardship. And that means leading that change proactively, rather than reacting to change as we so often do. This is a well thought out approach, and I support it. I have just signed the petition asking that the pollinator demonstration garden not be located in Crippen's meadow. I have lived on Bowen since 1978 and as you can imagine the lovely natural meadow has been a large part of my life here. In good and not so good weather it is almost a daily destination. Those of us with children, dogs, friends, visitors or just the need for a fresh breath will head to the meadow to sit in the sun, throw a ball or just stroll about. The idea of losing one quarter or indeed any of that space to an artificial, fenced garden, no matter how educational, is horrifying. Hard to believe it is even being considered. The birds, bees, assorted rodents and bugs are more than capable of supporting the natural pollination. I would also like to know why the organization hoping to undertake this project will not consider an alternate location. Surely their commitment to the concept should support making adjustments that will allow them to achieve their goal. I am against the building of the cultivation garden in the meadow on Bowen Island. My husband s family has lived on Bowen for over 50 years and although we don t live on Bowen, we regularly visit his mother who continues to live there. Our family are avid runners and we regularly run through this natural meadow of subtle beauty and uncultivated tranquility. Mother Nature has been working on this area for a century, and offers a demonstration every single day. Keep Bowen super natural British Columbia!! This is to confirm that I am NOT in favour of the pollinator garden in Crippen Park meadow. I am a regular user of the meadow and surrounding park and would like to continue the experience of the meadow as it currently is. The addition of the dog park has already negatively changed how we use the meadow and I am concerned that the pollinator garden will reduce the experience even more. The dog park is rarely used and ruined our favourite place to observe wildlife; the pollinator garden will create an urban feel to a space that is in a natural setting so let s not repeat the mistake. I m sure there are other viable locations for the proposed garden which would be more accessible to Bowen residents and visitors. 73 Regional Parks Committee 138

139 This is a great initiative for Crippen Park and Bowen Island and I strongly support it and request it be approved without undue delay so that the Pollinator Garden can be functioning in This is a great idea and the location for it in the meadow is ideal. Please proceed with this well thought out and well planned initiative. I would like to voice my concern about the proposed building of a pollinator garden in the meadow area of Crippen Park on Bowen Island. While I understand the value of a pollinator garden I believe that this garden should be not be constructed in a natural park area but rather in an area that is already zoned for agriculture or for development. An area near Snug Cove or an agricultural area would be more suitable. Creating this garden would involve erecting a five or six foot high deer fence, bringing in irrigation, and I understand creating raised beds and gravel pathways. This type of garden would be much more suitable to an area where the services are already in place. There are increasingly few really natural areas of parkland and Crippen Park is such an area. The pollination garden with raised beds is perhaps more akin to the 'allotment' gardens in Ambleside beside the sea. You might think that building a garden in an area of parkland is just fine...but this is not a park like VanDusen Gardens but a natural area with a thriving established ecosystem of creatures that are interconnected and are, indeed, already acting as pollinators. Would you dig up the beach to create a 'man-made area of rock pools', would you fence off an area of ocean to house fish and dolphins and grow special seaweed? We have enjoyed Crippen Park as a whole and the meadows in particular. Taking our children, when they were younger on nature walks and to run or ride bicycles through the park. I urge you not to destroy an area of protected natural beauty. Build the garden in an area that is already 'cultivated'. I am not in favour of the pollinator demonstration garden in the meadows at Killarney Lake. I use the park 3-4 times a week and it is important to me and my family that it remains undeveloped. As a long time resident of Bowen Island and avid gardener, I support the idea of a pollinator garden on Bowen Island, and the initiative taken by the Bowen Agricultural Alliance ( BAA ) to create one for education and interpretative purposes. However, I am opposed to the location of this garden in the Killarney Meadow. 74 Regional Parks Committee 139

140 Why I oppose the proposed location I oppose the location in the Killarney Meadow because of my concerns over depletion of native pollinator habitat. The Killarney Meadow in its current state has a broad biodiversity of plants, which already support a large number of native pollinators. The proposed initiative will destroy the existing native pollinator environment and replace it with an artificial native pollinator garden. This is likely to lead to fewer nesting sites for bumble bees, solitary bees and wasps, and larval food plants for butterflies, moths and beetles. Removal of the salmonberry bushes in the meadow will deplete both hummingbird foraging and nesting habitat. The Metro Vancouver s Ecological Health Action Plan advocates for protection of native pollinator habitat. The proposed BAA plan, although very well intentioned in its goals, will unfortunately reduce this habitat. With the current active uses in the meadow the horse paddock and the off leash dog area there has already been a significant reduction in the area s natural habitat. Any further reduction will affect the ability of some of the birdlife to forage for seeds, berries and insects. I am also concerned about the impact this proposed garden and the consequent public traffic will have on the population of garter snakes, which are particularly abundant in the meadow. Garter snakes are important predators of slugs, insects and mice, and thus an important element in the meadow ecosystem. Finally, the Killarney meadow is a very popular place for islanders and visitors alike, who enjoy the quiet and solitude this place offers. The addition of a fenced garden site utilizing one third of the meadow with structures and more human activity will detract from this experience. We encourage the BAA to consider alternate locations for their proposed pollinator garden, somewhere that will not cause any damage to existing natural pollinator habitat. I am in favour of this initiative. Attached is a pdf document containing my comments about this proposed initiative in Crippen Park on Bowen Island (refer to attachment to this document) In regards to the proposed pollinator demonstration garden on Bowen Island, as a resident here, I am opposed to it proposed location in Killarney Meadows. I would like to express my full support of the pollinator demo garden in Crippen regional park on Bowen Island. I have looked at the details of this proposal and am opposed to the plans as they are currently. 75 Regional Parks Committee 140

141 I have connected with many experiences and educated individuals and groups and have, to date found no one in support, save the initiators. I am concerned about many aspects of the proposal. The main components that cause concern are fenced in vs. accessible, pollinator garden vs removing existent natural/native pollinators, education in a created environment vs educating in the available true natural locations on Bowen Island. I am open to discussion and learning more. :: 76 Regional Parks Committee 141

142 Comments on Crippen Regional Park Proposed Pollinator Initiative and Demo Garden My comments relate to the project overview on the Metro Vancouver website: ( ProjectsAndInitiatives/Pages/CrippenInitiative.aspx) and the presentation delivered by members of the Bowen Agricultural Alliance (BAA) on December 9, 2014 at the Bowen Island Community School. At the meeting on December 9, I expressed concerns about this project that I expand upon in this submission. I Do Not Support the Proposed Location in the Crippen Meadow Meadow is Currently a Healthy, Functioning Native Pollinator Habitat The Crippen Meadow has high biodiversity. It is made up of a mix of many species of native and non-native flowering plants, grasses, ferns and horsetails. The edges where the meadow meets the forest or wetland has many stands of native shrubs, especially salmonberry. This broad diversity of flowers is important sources of pollen and nectar for adult insect and vertebrate pollinators (hummingbirds). The variety of green foliage provides food for many caterpillars and larvae which become active pollinators as adult butterflies, flies and beetles. The biodiversity of plants here is especially important since many native pollinators have strong preferences for a narrow spectrum of host plants. A broad biodiversity of plants supports a broad biodiversity of pollinators. The numerous fallen branches and tree trunks on the edges and well into the centre of the meadow are used as nesting sites for a wide variety of bumble bees and solitary bees, wasps, ants and beetles all important pollinators. Finally the open nature of the meadow allows more sunlight to reach the ground creating a warm microclimate that is often noticeable by people entering the meadow from forest trails. This warm site attracts many pollinators who seek out warm dry wood or soil as optimum nesting and/or hibernation sites. What currently remains of the Crippen Meadow is a natural habitat that is integrated with the adjacent forest and wetland habitats that make up Crippen Regional Park. 5.5 Attachment 4 My Background I work as a planning consultant, developing interpretive plans, and education installations for parks, nature centres, museums and historic sites. My clients range from major institutions to non-profit community groups. Earlier, I was educated and worked as a entomologist, conducting field research on insect ecology. As a volunteer with the Bowen Nature Club, I regularly lead family nature discovery activities in the Killarney Meadow featuring insect ecology and native pollinators. And as an avid naturalist, I regularly observe and photograph insects, wildlife and wildflowers at this site. Significant Loss of Pollinator Habitat The proposed plan will significantly reduce native pollinator habitat. Understandably, the BAA has an agricultural focus. They propose to remove existing meadow habitat (native and non-native grasses, herbs and shrubs) and replace it with a raised bed garden that will include a selection of flowers attractive to native pollinators, a roofed structure, and perhaps a series of information signs about native pollinators. Even with plantings of non-native and native forage plants in a garden setting, It is my professional opinion that there will be a significant net loss in pollinator habitat, especially nesting sites for bumble bees, solitary bees and wasps and larval food plants for butterflies, moths and beetles. Removal of salmonberry bushes will deplete both hummingbird foraging and nesting habitat. This runs counter to Metro Vancouver s Ecological Health Action Plan, which advocates protection of native pollinator habitat. Protection of Pollinators and their Habitat The Ecological Health Action Plan (2012) includes a section focusing on pollinator populations. It recognizes that pollinator populations are under stress from the effects of habitat fragmentation, loss of secure and stable nesting and forage areas, disease, predators, parasites, climate change and pesticide use. Efforts will be focused on: protecting existing pollinator species protecting or existing pollinator habitat (maintaining native shrubs, grasses, flowers and trees) enhancing damaged pollinator habitats creating new habitat in areas where original habitat has been lost adapting land management practices to avoid causing harm to pollinator populations Regional Parks Committee 142

143 Meadow Habitat Loss and Fragmentation The area of natural meadow habitat has shrunk considerably since the Crippen Park Lands were purchased by Metro Vancouver. Some of this decrease has been the result of natural succession as trees and shrubs have moved into the meadow edges from the adjacent forest. Over a very long period, if no further disturbances occur, Crippen Meadow will be absorbed by the surrounding forest. Human human activities, however, have had a much bigger immediate impact on the meadow. The establishment of a mowed lawn area and a horse paddock in the south and a dog off-leash area in the north-west have reduced the meadow habitat by nearly half (see Figure 1 below). Dog Off-Leash Area Mowed Lawn Area Horse Paddock Remaining Meadow Habitat Figure 1: Lands currently removed from the original meadow habitat. I am alarmed by the possibility of further impact on the meadow by the proposed garden proposed by BAA. This would further reduce the remaining meadow habitat by nearly one third (see Figure 2). These reductions are likely to reduce the local biodiversity and the populations of native pollinators. Other Natural Uses of Crippen Meadow Feeding Habitat for Birds Other than pollinators the meadow is used by many species of wildlife including red-tail hawks. At least one regularly hunts mice and voles here. Many species of birds, both residents and migrators, can be observed foraging for seeds, berries and insects. The loss of one third of existing meadow habitat will negatively affect the populations and perhaps the biodiversity of birds that are adapted to meadow habitat. Garter Snake Hibernaculum Because there are few mid-sized snake predators such as skunks raccoons and foxes, the population of garter snakes on Bowen Island is high. Garter snakes play an important role as predators of slugs, insects and mice. Their abundance is one of the special features of the meadow. There is strong evidence that the farm building foundations (see Figure 2 for location) are used underground dens where snakes congregate below the winter frost line to survive the cold months of the year and for breeding in spring. Hibernacula are rare and important habitat for maintaining reptile populations and biodiversity. Snakes travel long distances to gather at hibernacula. The destruction of one can reduce or eliminate a large local population. I am very uneasy about the idea of using the foundation site for gardening and for gathering people near it. This is likely to result in a significant negative impact on local garter snake populations. Every spring and fall large numbers of garter snakes are seen around the foundations of a old building located within the area proposed as a garden. Snakes emerging from hibernacula in the spring are numerous and slow moving. They can be easily caught and killed by dogs and people who are afraid of snakes. Disturbance of this hibernaculum would decimate the local garter snake populations. Remaining Meadow Habitat Area to be Removed for BAA Garden Garter Snake Hibernaculum Figure 2: Location of proposed BAA garden. Regional Parks Committee 143

144 Other Concerns Visitor Experience According to Metro Vancouver s Regional Parks Plan (2011) a major focus of regional parks is to provide opportunities for passive outdoor recreation, nature study and community stewardship. Crippen Meadow is enjoyed regularly by many residents and visitors as a quiet place of solitude and enjoyment of the natural beauty of the meadow and the view of the forested landscape of Apodaca Ridge. They use the meadows to unwind and recharge in a quiet natural setting. The deep connection that many feel for the meadows was expressed by several people attending the December 9 information session. Other uses passive uses include nature photography, walking, wildlife-watching and nature study by groups led by members of the Bowen Nature Club. The removal of approximately one third of the remaining meadowlands and replacement with fenced garden plots will detract from the nature experience of many who already use this site. The impact of garden-related fences, structures, planters and human activity is inconsistent with walking in nature and wildlife/ nature viewing, primary activities of Crippen Park user as found in a recent survey (see 2013 visitor survey at metrovancouver.org/services/parks_lscr/planning%20docs/ VisitorSurveyReport pdf). Visitors to Crippen are an important part of Bowen s economy and quality of the visitor experience should be maintained. Vulnerability of Native Insects Crippen Meadow is surrounded by red alder forest on the north and eastern and part of its western edges. This rich open deciduous forest supports a high diversity of insects and birds. One of the insects common here are forest tent caterpillars. Their populations are generally kept in check by a intricate network of insect predators, parasites, diseases and some predatory birds. Occasionally there is a tent caterpillar population explosion which results in defoliation of alder trees and the mass movement of caterpillars. Generally, within a year these outbreaks are controlled by natural predators and disease. The native trees are adapted to these herbivore population fluctuations and they usually survive. However, many garden plants are vulnerable to these outbreaks. It will be difficult for BAA to deal with these outbreaks without the use of pesticides. Most pesticides have high toxicity to bees and other pollinators. Vulnerability to Vandalism The BAA proposal includes the development of a roofed shelter. My experience with parks across the country leads me to have concerns that this shelter and its relatively secluded location away from observation from local roads may result in this feature to become a local party site. Such sites and areas around them are often vandalized by party-goers. Regular vandalism will increase maintenance costs and may require regular evening patrols by Metro Vancouver Parks staff or RCMP. Conflicts with Existing Education Uses Currently native pollinators are present and abundant in the meadow, and easy to involve in interpretation and education programs. The proposed demo garden location has been where the highest diversity and abundance of native insects have been found and used in learning programs by local educators including me Sue Ellen Fast and Emily van Lidth de Jeude plus some teachers at BICS (see activity spot 3 on Meadow Bug Hunt excursion, BICS Teaching Trails resource: Hunt%20Brochure%20Quark.pdf). Lack of an Education Plan and Lack of Experience Development and delivery of effective education and interpretation is complex requiring detailed research and planning and goes well beyond providing information on sign panels (for example see the current works of Dr. Sam Ham and Dr. John Falk). The current BAA proposal is very weak in terms of substantial education planning and seems to focus on development of a garden rather than development of a learning program. It also lacks information on BAA s past successes in education and interpretation. Regional Parks Committee 144

145 Alternative Locations During the December 9 information meeting, some BAA members indicated that they had considered other sites as well as the Crippen Meadow. For the reasons stated above, I think that Crippen Meadow is not a good choice for the location of a pollinator demonstration garden. I suggest that the BAA group re-evaluate those options. If a goal of the BAA project is to expand pollinator habitat and increase their populations, other sites in Crippen Park or on private lands would be a better option, especially on sites that already are disturbed and lack pollinator habitat. Criteria for selection could include the following: a demonstration garden would enhance the habitat of native pollinators no damage to existing natural pollinator habitat no net loss of pollinator habitat or key wildlife habitat (e.g., snake hibernacula) access to and existing,, unencumbered water supply for watering plants and providing water for pollinators (some species of bees and wasps use mud for nest construction and require a water source to make mud) good sun exposure fertile soil close to where significant numbers of residents and visitors gather or pass by site is accessible by foot to: - local school classes - students and groups from off island Possible Locations of a Demonstration Garden in Snug Cove There are some interesting options in Crippen Park south of Government Road in Snug Cove. It may be possible to develop a small pollinator demonstration garden associated with the heritage garden behind Cottage 20 in the heritage precinct. This would require consultation and collaboration with Bowen Heritage and perhaps with the other effected community groups. Heritage Garden Other Potential Sites I Do Support in Principle the BAA Initiative for Pollinator Education BAA is an active volunteer group that has done good work expanding interest and support for locally grown food and related agricultural activities. They include a strong bee keeping group of members. Some members have also been involved in education activities with island schools and public outreach. I applaud BAA for recognizing the importance of pollinators to agriculture and the extreme pressure native pollinators are under, especially with the introduction of neonicotinoid insecticides that began in the 1990s. Recent research has definitively shown that these insecticides have a strong negative effect on most insect pollinators (see Hapwood et al, 2012) and new research shows a connection between these chemicals and colony collapse syndrome in honey bees (Dwyer, 2014). I support their proposed initiatives to develop education and interpretation about pollinators, their biology and importance, plus their desire to engage and inspire people to work to preserve or enhance native pollinator habitat at the places that they live. Respectfully submitted by: Will Husby Regional Parks Committee Reed Road, Bowen Island BC, V0N 1G1 will@ecoleaders.ca, My comments are related to three key foundation documents: 1. Metro Vancouver s Ecological Health Action Plan Key Points This is a far-seeing document that recognizes the importance of biodiversity and the value of ecological goods and services to the health and quality of life for people living in the region: Healthy, properly functioning natural systems are the foundation to the region s economic prosperity, our collective quality of life and personal well-being. the continued prosperity of the region is still linked to the natural beauty of the region and the ability of local ecosystems to provide clean water and other essential services. These services coupled with parks that provide spaces for relaxation, recreation and rejuvenation all contribute to the well-being of the region s residents. Metro Vancouver has made significant efforts to incorporate ecological health into its decision making. Since 2002, Metro Vancouver has formally put the concept of sustainability at the centre of its operating and planning philosophy and has been one of the leading agencies in promoting a sustainable future for the region. The Ecological Health Action Plan includes a section focusing on pollinator populations. The plan states that: In general, these Supplementing Ecosystem Services projects will contribute to improvements in the aesthetics of urban landscapes and some will help to enhance the Regional Green Infrastructure Network. It recognizes that pollinator populations are under stress from the effects of habitat fragmentation, loss of secure and stable nesting and forage areas, disease, predators, parasites, climate change and pesticide use. 2. Regional Parks Plans The Regional Parks and Greenways Plan (2005) provides strategic direction to the operations of Metro Vancouver s Regional Parks, and the updated Regional Parks Plan (2011) provide a framework for to protecting and enhancing natural systems in regional parks and include public education and engagement programs related to the understanding of ecological goods and services that thy provide and stewardship of natural capital. 3. Regional Food System Strategy Adopted in 2011, this strategy encourages collaboration of all regional stakeholders to create a sustainable, resilient and healthy regional food system. It recognizes that healthy, functioning ecosystems are essential for the production of food. Implementation will include actions that protect and enhance ecosystem goods and services.

146 change.org 5.5 Attachment 5 Recipient: Bowen Agricultural Alliance and Metro Vancouver Letter: Greetings, Please find an alternate location for a pollinator demonstration garden on Bowen Island. Crippen Park is a public park, used by much of the island's population for recreation, and also is becoming an ecologically valuable wetland and water catchment area, due to the fortuitous arrival of beavers in Killarney Creek. A pollinator demonstration garden can be a wonderful educational resource, and we are not averse to having one on the island, but we feel that the proposed location in Killarney Meadows is unsuitable. The Killarney Meadows are already populated by many pollinators and naturally-occuring pollinator attractors, especially in the currently unmowed area being considered for the pollinator garden. To remove this and build a human-designed approximation would in fact disrupt the healthy process already happening, there. In addition, we would like to note the slow erosion of our public lands by private interests such as the dog park and BIHORA ring. To add a fenced garden and covered picnic area to the middle of the meadows will erode both the natural character and public enjoyment of the park dramatically. We would like to register our hope that the plans made by the Bowen Agricultural Alliance can be actualized in another location, hopefully someplace already built, such as the cove. Regional Parks Committee 146