ARC MAPPING Things to Consider

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "ARC MAPPING Things to Consider"

Annabel Holmes
6 years ago
Views:

1 ARC MAPPING By David M. Wheeler, IAAI-CFI, CFEI, CFII Featured in Fire & Arson Investigator, July 2015 Volume 1, Issue 1 Submit your assignment: Call: (800) services@nefco.net Online:

[1] The concept is based on the premise that fire attacks the insulation on the electrical conductors in close proximity to where the fire originates, causing abnormal electrical activity such as an

2 David M. Wheeler, IAAI-CFI, CFEI, CFII NEFCO Fire Investigations, Inc. Arc Mapping INTRODUCTION A great deal has been written about Arc-Mapping and its effectiveness in identifying the origin of a fire, dating back to the early 1970 s. [1] The concept is based on the premise that fire attacks the insulation on the electrical conductors in close proximity to where the fire originates, causing abnormal electrical activity such as an arc fault between the electrical conductors, which, in turn, trips the overcurrent protection and produces characteristic damage that may be recognized after a fire. Once the overcurrent protection operates, the circuit being examined is no longer energized, and no further arcing will occur on that circuit. In theory, evidence of this [abnormal] electrical activity may be useful in locating the area of origin. [2] There are many factors that influence the reliability of Arc-Mapping, however, and very little has been published that specifically addresses such factors (or concerns). Consideration must be given to such things as fire loads, level(s) of protective coverings over the wiring, and ventilation effects, to name a few, which can adversely affect the reliability of Arc-Mapping. To that end, a series of full-scale compartment fires were conducted in which energized electrical conductors were exposed to fire conditions. After the fires were extinguished, electrical activity on the conductors was identified and mapped to determine its relationship to the origin of the fires. In an effort to produce differing fire growth scenarios, a variety of solid fuel arrangements were positioned throughout three burn cells, and differing levels of protective covering was applied over the electrical wiring. Some were covered with gypsum wallboard, while others had -inch wood paneling, and others had no protection whatsoever covering the wiring. The burn times were determined by the activation of the overcurrent protection at the electrical distribution panel, at which point the fires were extinguished. As a result, the level of fire growth varied in each of the experiments. EXPERIMENTS Photo 1 Three substantially identical compartments with offset doorways were constructed and furnished. Each of the compartments measured approximately 16 ft. long, 12 ft. wide, and 8 ft. high. The offset door was placed in the A-Side wall, as can be seen in Photograph 1. Walls and ceilings were lined with unfinished standard sheets of ½-inch gypsum wallboard to protect the wood framing of the burn cell. The floor consisted of unfinished oriented strand board (OSB). Each compartment was then wired with 14 AWG, non-metallic cable, which was connected to a100-ampere electrical distribution panel on the exterior of the compartment with eight individual branch circuits. Each branch circuit, which was protected by a 15-ampere circuit breaker was energized during the experiments. The wiring ran up the interior rear walls, across the ceilings, and down the front walls where they were connected to a variety of electrical loads on the exterior of the cell. (See photographs 2, 3 and Figure 1, 2 & 3) Each of the three burn cells was arranged differently with household furniture to represent various living spaces. A fire was set in each of the cells and allowed to persist until the over-current protection for the circuits tripped. The fires were extinguished via one ceiling mounted sprinkler head to minimize damage to the compartment. For documentation purposes, each of the burn cells were divided into four quadrants, beginning of the left-front corner, which was designated as quadrant #1, and proceeding in a clockwise fashion. Still photography, video and thermal imagery was used to document the experiment Fire&Arson Investigator July2015

EXPERIMENT #1 Ceiling coverings and exposed electrical wiring.

gypsum wallboard and exposed to the heat from the fire without any protective covering over them.

(See photographs 2 through 4) In this experiment, Quadrants 1 & 2 had equal fire loads, consisting of a full-sized mattress in each, and solid

1) Fire Load Arrangement Cell 1 Photo 4 - Quadrants 1 & 2 The fire was set by applying an open flame to the side of a mattress at the extreme

The compartment reached a temperature of 442 C (829 F) and was extinguished before reaching flashover.

arcing between the hot and neutral conductors was located on each of the energized circuits, and their locations were documented with orange

3 EXPERIMENT #1 Ceiling coverings and exposed electrical wiring. Photo 2 - View of Left side, Cell 1 Photo 3 - View of Rear Side, Cell 1 During this experiment, the non-metallic cables were affixed to the gypsum wallboard and exposed to the heat from the fire without any protective covering over them. This scenario was designed to simulate an unfinished area, such as a basement or a portion of a dwelling at various stages of construction. (See photographs 2 through 4) In this experiment, Quadrants 1 & 2 had equal fire loads, consisting of a full-sized mattress in each, and solid wood furniture in the remaining two quadrants. (See photograph 4 and Fig. 1) Fire Load Arrangement Cell 1 Photo 4 - Quadrants 1 & 2 The fire was set by applying an open flame to the side of a mattress at the extreme left-rear corner in Quadrant #2 and allowed to burn for a period of 4 minutes, 34 seconds until the over-current protection tripped at the panel. The compartment reached a temperature of 442 C (829 F) and was extinguished before reaching flashover. (See photographs 6 through 8) Fire Growth Burn Cell #1 Photo 5 - Quadrants 3 & 4 Photo 6 - Fire started at B-C corner Photo 7 Photo 8 Electrical arcing between the hot and neutral conductors was located on each of the energized circuits, and their locations were documented with orange marking tape. The evidence of arcing was found along the ceiling at the rear portion within Quadrants 2 & 3, extending across the entire length of the ceiling with arcing located immediately over where the fire originated, as well as at the right-rear corner opposite the doorway opening. (See photographs 9, 10, and Fig. 1)...continued on page 20 Fire&Arson Investigator July

Arc Mapping Arc Mapping of Burn Cell #1 EXPERIMENT #1 continued Figure 1 Diagram - Cell 1 Photo 9 - Quadrant #2

Burn Cell #1 Photo 11 - Quadrants 3 & 4 (Facing Side D) Photo 12 - Quadrants 1 & 2 (Facing Side B) During this

covered over with ½-inch gypsum wallboard to shield them from the heat.

The wiring in Quadrants 3 & 4 was covered over with -inch wood paneling to provide for differing levels of

The scenario was designed to simulate a dwelling where various construction materials are used.

4 Arc Mapping Arc Mapping of Burn Cell #1 EXPERIMENT #1 continued Figure 1 Diagram - Cell 1 Photo 9 - Quadrant #2 (Facing B/C Corner) Photo 10 - Quadrants 2 & 3 (Facing Side C, opposite doorway) EXPERIMENT #2 Ceiling coverings Burn Cell #1 Photo 11 - Quadrants 3 & 4 (Facing Side D) Photo 12 - Quadrants 1 & 2 (Facing Side B) During this experiment, non-metallic cables were affixed to the gypsum wallboard with all electrical wiring on the walls then covered over with ½-inch gypsum wallboard to shield them from the heat. The wiring across the ceiling in Quadrants 1 & 2 was also covered with ½-inch gypsum wallboard. The wiring in Quadrants 3 & 4 was covered over with -inch wood paneling to provide for differing levels of protective covering over the electrical wiring than those in Quadrants 1 & 2. The scenario was designed to simulate a dwelling where various construction materials are used. (See photograph 11). The fire load consisted of an overstuffed sectional sofa and a wood desk in Quadrants 1 & 2, and a solid wood dresser in Quadrants 3 & 4. (See photographs 13 & 14 on page 21) 20 Fire&Arson Investigator July2015

EXPERIMENT #2 continued Photo 13 - Cell 2, Facing Side B Fire Load Arrangement Photo

crumpled newspaper that was positioned adjacent to the sectional sofa and immediately

The fire was allowed to burn for a period of 5 minutes, 1 second until the

The compartment reached temperatures of 454 C (850 F) and was extinguished before

(See photograph 15 through 19) Fire Growth Burn Cell #2 Photo 15 Photo 16 Electrical

5 EXPERIMENT #2 continued Photo 13 - Cell 2, Facing Side B Fire Load Arrangement Photo 14 - Cell 2, Facing Side C The fire was set in Quadrant 1 by applying an open flame to crumpled newspaper that was positioned adjacent to the sectional sofa and immediately beneath cotton draping attached to the B-side wall. The fire was allowed to burn for a period of 5 minutes, 1 second until the over-current protection tripped at the panel. The compartment reached temperatures of 454 C (850 F) and was extinguished before reaching flashover. (See photograph 15 through 19) Fire Growth Burn Cell #2 Photo 15 Photo 16 Electrical arcing was identified on the energized circuits, and their locations were documented with orange marking tape. Evidence of arcing was found at ceiling level within Quadrant 3, immediately opposite the doorway opening with no arcing located near where the fire was started. (See photographs 20 & 21, and Fig. 2 on page 22) Photo 17 Photo 18 Photo 19...continued on page 22 Fire&Arson Investigator July

Arc Mapping EXPERIMENT #2 continued EXPERIMENT #3 Ceiling coverings Burn Cell #1 Arc Mapping Burn Cell #2 Photo 22 Photo 20

non-metallic cables were affixed to the underside of the gypsum wallboard, and all electrical wiring was then covered with

This scenario was designed to simulate a room of standard construction.

Crumpled newspaper was arranged along the floor in Quadrant 2 against the side of a wood bookshelf, which was positioned

The fire load in Quadrants 2 & 3 consisted of an overstuffed chair and pullout sofa bed with an assortment of bedding

6 Arc Mapping EXPERIMENT #2 continued EXPERIMENT #3 Ceiling coverings Burn Cell #1 Arc Mapping Burn Cell #2 Photo 22 Photo 20 - A view facing Side B Photo 23 Photo 21 - D (opposite doorway) Figure 2 Diagram - Cell 2 During this experiment, non-metallic cables were affixed to the underside of the gypsum wallboard, and all electrical wiring was then covered with ½-inch gypsum wallboard to shield them from the heat, which provided equal protection over all energized circuits. This scenario was designed to simulate a room of standard construction. Fire loads in Quadrant 1 consisted of a combination of a solid wood desk, chairs and fabric-covered furniture. Crumpled newspaper was arranged along the floor in Quadrant 2 against the side of a wood bookshelf, which was positioned immediately adjacent to an overstuffed chair. The fire load in Quadrants 2 & 3 consisted of an overstuffed chair and pullout sofa bed with an assortment of bedding material. The fire load in Quadrant 4 consisted of a wood roomdivider and a solid wood bookshelf. The fire was set in Quadrant 2 by applying an open flame to the sheets of crumbled newspaper. (See photographs 24 through 32 and Fig. 3) 22 Fire&Arson Investigator July2015

Fire Load Arrangement Burn Cell #3 The fire was

second at which time the overcurrent protection

During this experiment, the compartment reached

Photo 24 - Quadrants 2 & 3 Photo 25 - Quadrants

was identified on the energized circuits and

7 Fire Load Arrangement Burn Cell #3 The fire was allowed to burn for a period of 11 minutes, 1 second at which time the overcurrent protection tripped at the panel. During this experiment, the compartment reached post- flashover conditions with temperatures exceeding 648 C (1,198 F) before being extinguished. Photo 24 - Quadrants 2 & 3 Photo 25 - Quadrants 3 & 4 Fire Growth Burn Cell #3 Electrical arcing was identified on the energized circuits and their locations were documented with orange marking tape. Evidence of arcing was found at ceiling level along the rear wall within Quadrant 2 immediately over the overstuffed chair, a short distance from where the fire started. Photo 26 Photo 27 Photo 28 Photo 29 Photo 30 Arc Mapping Burn Cell #3 Photo 31 Facing Side - B Photo 32 Facing B/C Corner...continued on page 24 Fire&Arson Investigator July

Arc Mapping EXPERIMENT #3 continued Figure 3 Diagram - Cell 3 In experiment #1, where all electrical wiring was unprotected and equally exposed to the heat, Arc-Mapping proved to be useful in

8 Arc Mapping EXPERIMENT #3 continued Figure 3 Diagram - Cell 3 In experiment #1, where all electrical wiring was unprotected and equally exposed to the heat, Arc-Mapping proved to be useful in identifying the fire s origin, which was easily verified by visible fire damage patterns. However, it is worth noting that electrical activity (arcing) was also present in the area immediately opposite the ventilation opening, (At the C D corner), which was a distance away from where the fire started. In experiment #2, where the electrical wiring had a greater degree of protective covering (Gypsum) in Quadrants 1 and 2, and a lesser degree of protection over the wiring in Quadrants 3 & 4 (1/8-inch wood paneling), Arc-Mapping proved completely ineffective in identifying the origin. High velocity flows and turbulence from the ventilation opening intensified the fire in this location, which attacked the insulation on the electrical conductors early in the progression of the fire. This resulted in tripping of the overcurrent protection. Although Arc-Mapping was ineffective in identifying where the fire started, visible fire patterns clearly identified the origin. In experiment #3, the fire burned in a localized area for a substantial duration where the fire started before fuel gases filling the compartment became Conclusions involved. Arc-Mapping was useful in this experiment. However, the electrical activity was not found immediately over the fire s origin, but rather in the general proximity. Electrical activity was also found opposite the ventilation opening, away from where the fire started. Once again, visible fire damage patterns clearly identified the origin. Several important concepts were derived from the experiment with regard to the effectiveness of Arc-Mapping. Although proven to be an useful tool in the identification of an area of origin, a credible origin analysis hinges upon consideration of many factors, including the location(s) and configuration of fire load, the recognition and understanding of the influences of high velocity flows and turbulence from the ventilation openings, differing levels of protective coating over electrical wiring, as well as stages of fire growth attained. As with any origin determination, investigators must be able to identify and then segregate fire scene damage that may potentially be attributed to pre and post-flashover fire conditions. In preflashover conditions, fire pattern analysis most often defines the origin, and Arc- Mapping is used as a tool to confirm what the patterns reflect. However, fire loads that influence heat release rates and burn damage within a specific localized area may produce evidence of arcing that is not associated with the fire s origin. Most notable in this experiment was the evidence of arcing found in areas opposite the ventilation openings where the fire did not originate. High velocity, turbulent flows opposite and around ventilation openings produce a concentration of high temperatures, which can impact electrical conductors if present in that area, thus produce arcing that, if misunderstood, could lead to an inaccurate origin being identified. Therefore, for Arc-Mapping to be useful in identifying the origin of a fire, it is essential that investigators distinguish between the damage created by ventilation effects versus the damage created purely by fire attack around the location(s) where the fire started. Careful steps must be taken to ascertain the exact physical makeup of the compartment in terms of wall, floor and ceiling coverings, fuel packages and arrangements, window treatments, the conditions of ventilation openings and at which stage in the fires progression they were opened or failed. The failure to thoroughly investigate and consider these factors may lead to an erroneous origin. 1 Svare, R. Arc Mapping Brunel University, Uxbridge, London. 2 NFPA 921, Sec , Guide for Fire & Explosion Investigations, 2014 Ed. ACKNOWLEDMENTS The author wishes to thank the Concord, NH Fire Department and its members for their invaluable support, and the New Hampshire Fire Academy for the use of their facility. David M. Wheeler, IAAI-CFI, C.F.E.I., C.F.I.I. (NAFI) David is a full-time fire investigator with NEFCO Fire Investigations, Inc. He served 30 years in New Hampshire Law Enforcement, and has more than 20 years of experience as a volunteer firefighter. He holds degrees in Fire Science and Criminal Justice and serves as an Adjunct Instructor in the Fire Science program at Lakes Region Community College in Laconia, NH Fire&Arson Investigator July2015

Ventilation Effects on Fire Patterns during Post Flashover Burning

Ventilation Effects on Fire Patterns during Post Flashover Burning By Matthew Obach, M.A.Sc., EIT, CFEI In order to determine the origin of a fire, fire investigators analyze fire patterns that remain