APPENDIX D. Slope Stability Analysis Results for Soil and Overburden Storage Mounds
|
|
- Rudolph Stanley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Geotechnical Assessment Report APPENDIX D Slope Stability Analysis Results for Soil and Overburden Storage Mounds DABGeot/09059GA/Final
2 Geotechnical Assessment Report STABILITY OF SOIL AND OVERBURDEN STORAGE MOUNDS D. Shear Strength Parameters Most glacial tills are fissured or contain other directional voids that permit pore pressure dissipation. Preference has therefore been given to the use of effective stress tests in determining the shear strength of the glacial cover at Highthorn site. The results of the consolidated undrained triaxial compression tests are summarized in Tables and 3. Both the cohesion (c') and friction angle (ø') values have been derived from linear envelopes drawn to sets of Mohr circles of failure. Whilst this is in accordance with BS377 Part 8 (990), Section 7.6.3, Note 4, some of the intercept values (c') are considered to be too high. This conclusion is based upon the examination and back analysis of a number of failures at surface mines in the UK and the application of a curved failure envelope. Further analysis has therefore been undertaken by plotting the successive stress states of each of the test specimens in p, q space where: p = σ + σ 3 and q = σ - σ 3 Data from Ferneybeds site and the National Coal Board s offshore investigations at Highthorn have been included in the analysis. The soil types have been classified in accordance with the units defined by Robertson (99) so that direct comparison can be made with the shear strengths similarly derived using the combined data from a large number of sites in Northumberland. The data are plotted in Figures D to D3. D DABGeot/09059GA/Final
3 Geotechnical Assessment Report Unit Unit Figure D p -q Plots for Units and DAB Geotechnics Ltd. Scheme Geotechnical Assessment Report Date: 6 th May 05 D DABGeot/09059GA/Final
4 Geotechnical Assessment Report Unit 3 Unit 4 Figure D p -q Plots for Units 3 and 4 DAB Geotechnics Ltd. Scheme Geotechnical Assessment Report Date: 6 th May 05 D3 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
5 Geotechnical Assessment Report Remoulded Units and 3 Figure D3 p -q Plots for Remoulded Units and 3 DAB Geotechnics Ltd. Scheme Geotechnical Assessment Report Date: 6 th May 05 Linear regression has provided values for the intercept (A') and the slope (tan a ) for the best fit linear curve. The parameters c' and ø' have then determined using the following equations: ø' = sin - (tan α'), where α' is the slope of the linear curve; and c' - A' where A' is the intercept (set at zero). cosø' The results are summarized in Table D, most of which are distinctly lower than those derived by Robertson (99), but nevertheless have been used to model the ground conditions at Highthorn. D4 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
6 Geotechnical Assessment Report General Description Unit Highthorn Site Northumberland * c' (knm - ) ø' ( ) c' (knm - ) ø' ( ) Soft to firm, orange or reddish brown, mottled grey, silty or sandy CLAY Firm to very stiff, reddish brown, brown or grey brown, silty sandy to gravelly CLAY with occasional laminations of silt or sand Very stiff, grey silty CLAY Soft to stiff, brown thinly to thickly laminated CLAY Remoulded mixture of Units and * Robertson (99). Table D Summary of Calculated c' and ø' Values D. Topsoil Storage Mounds The stability of the topsoil mounds has been assessed using Bishop s Simplified method for circular failure, the most likely potential failure mechanism, and the computer program, Talren. Non-circular failure has also been considered. Shear strength parameters for remoulded topsoil were determined by analysing triaxial test data from Shotton site in Northumberland and are as follows: c = 0 kn/m and = 35º (bulk density.84 Mg/m 3 ) The topsoil mounds will be founded on natural ground (glacial material). Three scenarios were considered in accessing their stability: (i) (ii) (iii) a foundation comprising Unit material (weathered glacial till); a foundation consisting of Unit (i.e. in the absence of any weathered glacial till or Unit material); and a mound founded on a soil succession comprising solely Unit 4 (laminated clay). The cable percussion boreholes clearly show that the third scenario will not occur at Highthorn site, but laminated clay is present and the analysis results serve to demonstrate the likely effects on stability. Unit 3 only occurs are depth. The shear strengths for all the foundation materials were taken from Tables D with bulk densities derived from the data provided in Appendix B. Characterization of the laminated clay would have benefited from a number of shear box tests, but this omission from the test programme is not thought to be critical. A mound height of 6m was used in all the calculations. D5 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
7 Geotechnical Assessment Report The mounds will be constructed with outer slopes of not greater than v in h (6.6º) and this profile was used in the analysis. Induced pore pressures will be very low at shallow depth due to fissuring of the glacial material, but a range of values (expressed in terms of the pore pressure ratio, r u ) were used for comparative purposes and to the assess the likely impact of an adjacent subsoil or overburden mound. The pore pressures will dissipate with time and at depth this process can be quite slow owing to the low permeability of the glacial till. It will be enhanced where the adjacent ground is excavated. An assessment has been made of the stability of the mounds where they lie adjacent to the highwalls, but it is the security of the slopes themselves which will be critical. Further details are given in Appendix E. For the purposes of this exercise, a slope gradient of v in h (45 ) was used regardless of the thickness of the glacial deposits. This is the steepest profile recommended in Section 5.4. and represents the most conservative condition. The factors of safety (FoS) were determined using a grid of circle centres and the results are shown in Figures D4 to D3. A summary is provided in Tables D to D4 where the following classification has been applied: <.00 Unstable.0 to. Barely stable. to.3 Short term stability (i.e. a few days or weeks).4 Medium term stability (i.e. a few weeks or months).5 Long term stability (i.e. months and years) The analysis results indicate that stability can be maintained if the outer slopes of the topsoil mounds are formed at not greater than v in h (6.6º) as planned. Where they are formed at a lower angle the factors of safety will be higher. The same will apply where the mounds are constructed at a lower height. If any pore pressures are induced they will be relatively low and will slowly dissipate. This and the consolidation of the deposited material will also improve stability. Minor slumping or sliding of the outer surfaces of the mounds may occur, especially if the topsoil has a high moisture content when it is stripped, but as experience has shown this will not endanger plant and personnel. The recommended standoff from the site boundary (3m) will ensure that the security of adjacent properties is not compromised. D6 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
8 Geotechnical Assessment Report Location of Slip Circle Topsoil Mound Founded on Unit Soil Slip circles with overall minimum factor of safety. Slip circles forced through point m behind crest of outer slope. Slip circles forced through point m behind crest of outer slope. Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5). Slip circles forced through foundation with adjacent excavation highwall. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation with adjacent excavation highwall. Partly drained conditions. Non-circular failure surface extending from the crest of the mound and through the upper part of the foundation to the highwall. Fully drained conditions. Ditto with r u = 0.. Ditto with r u = 0.4. Factor of Safety Notes Slip circles confined to the outer surface of the topsoil mound and are representative of minor unravelling only. Stable in medium term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the outer slope. Stable in long term. Slip circle with the minimum factor of safety extends through the full height of the outer slope. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the mound. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 3m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the mound. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 3m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety daylight in the central part of the outer slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about.5m from the toe. Stable in medium term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety daylight in the central part of the outer slope. They penetrate up to m into the foundation and extend about.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the mound. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 3m from the toe. Stable in long term. Not possible to generate plausible slip surfaces that extend through the mound and slope. Stable in long term. Stable in long term. Stable in long term. Table D Summary of Slope Stability Analysis Results for Topsoil Storage Mounds D7 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
9 Geotechnical Assessment Report Location of Slip Circle Topsoil Mound Founded on Unit Soil Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5). Slip circles forced through foundation with adjacent excavation highwall. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation with adjacent excavation highwall (r u = 0.). Non-circular failure surface extending from the crest of the mound and through the upper part of the foundation to the highwall. Fully drained conditions. Ditto with r u = 0.. Ditto with r u = 0.4. Factor of Safety Notes Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the mound. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 3m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the mound or from the upper part of the outer slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 3m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circle with the minimum factor of safety extends from the upper part of the outer slope. It penetrates up to.0m into the foundation and extends about.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circle with the minimum factor of safety extends from the upper part of the outer slope. It penetrates up to.5m into the foundation and extends about 3.5m from the toe. Barely stable. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the mound. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 3m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the mound and from the upper part of the outer slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 3m from the toe. Stable in long term. Other slip circles extend at depth through the foundation and daylight in the excavation slope. Not possible to generate plausible slip surfaces at higher pore pressure ratios. Stable in long term. Stable in long term. Stable in long term. Table D3 Summary of Slope Stability Analysis Results for Topsoil Storage Mounds D8 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
10 Geotechnical Assessment Report Location of Slip Circle Topsoil Mound Founded on Unit 4 Soil Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5). Slip circles forced through foundation with adjacent excavation highwall. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation with adjacent excavation highwall. Partly drained conditions. Non-circular failure surface extending from the crest of the mound and through the upper part of the foundation to the highwall. Fully drained conditions. Ditto with r u = 0.. Ditto with r u = 0.4. Factor of Safety Notes Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the mound. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 3m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circle with the minimum factor of safety extends from the central part of the outer slope. It penetrates up to 0.5m into the foundation and extends about.5m from the toe. Stable in medium term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the mound or the crest of the outer slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 3.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circle with the minimum factor of safety extends from the upper part of the outer slope. It penetrates up to.5m into the foundation and extends about 3.5m from the toe. Barely stable. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the mound. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about.5m from the toe. Stable in long term. Not possible to generate plausible slip surfaces that extend through the mound and slope. Stable in long term. Stable in long term. Stable in long term. Table D4 Summary of Slope Stability Analysis Results for Topsoil Storage Mounds D9 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
11 Geotechnical Assessment Report D3. Subsoil and Drift Material Storage Mounds The stability of the subsoil mounds was also assessed using Bishop s Simplified method for circular failure. This is again the most likely potential failure mechanism. Complete remoulding of the subsoil material is unlikely to occur during mound construction because of the method of emplacement: namely, excavation by backactor, end tipping from rigid and/or articulated dumptrucks and spreading by dozers. Investigations at the former Acklington and Colliersdean surface mines in Northumberland suggest that the shear strength of the mound material can closely match that of the in situ weathered till, more so after a period of consolidation. The parameters used in these calculations have been based on p -q analysis of Unit test data as follows: c = 0 kn/m and = 30º. A bulk density of.00 Mg/m 3 was used to represent the deposited material, but this will increase as consolidation ensues. The same foundations were considered as for the topsoil mounds and where Unit has been used, this is based on the reasonable assumption that not all of this material will have been removed during the stripping of the subsoil. A mound height of m was adopted with outer slopes of v in h (6.6 ). Fully drained conditions were assumed, but the effect of induced pore pressures was considered. These will again be very low at shallow depth due to the presence of fissures. The minimum factors of safety were determined using a grid of circle centres and the results are presented in Figure D3 to D57. A summary is provided in Tables D5 to D7. The same classification has been applied as in Section D. The results show that in general the stability of the deposited subsoil can be maintained if the outer slopes of the mounds are formed at not greater than v in h (6.6º). The mound foundations will comprise a combination of the soil types identified in the cable percussion boreholes, although Unit appears to be predominant. This may or may not be capped by a layer of Unit material. Layers or beds of laminated clay (Unit 4) will only impact the factors of safety where they lie at very shallow depth (less than 4m), which is generally not the case. Minor slumping of the outer slopes of the mounds may occur during or shortly after placement, but stability will improve as the subsoil consolidates as experience has shown. Such occurrences will not compromise the safety of plant, personnel and members of the public. Adjacent properties will remain unaffected because of the standoffs that will be provided. Nevertheless, it is recommended that the outer slopes of the mounds are graded to the required profiles as soon as the deposited material reaches 3m in height. This operation should be continued until construction is completed. The analysis results are based on a m high structure and not all mounds will be constructed to this height nor will the side slopes be formed as steeply as v in h (6.6 ). Both these factors will serve to increase the factors of safety. The drift material storage mound will be constructed to a maximum height of m, but its eastern slope will be graded down to about v in 5h (.3 ). The stored material will comprise a mixture of Units and and as such the shear strength should be close to that used in the calculations. However, the recommendations made with regard to the construction of the subsoil mounds equally apply. D DABGeot/09059GA/Final
12 Geotechnical Assessment Report Location of Slip Circle Subsoil Mound Founded on Unit Soil Slip circles with overall minimum factor of safety. Slip circles forced through point m behind crest of outer slope. Slip circles forced through point m behind crest of outer slope. Slip circles forced through point 4m behind crest of outer slope. Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5). Slip circles forced through foundation with adjacent excavation highwall. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation with adjacent excavation highwall. Partly drained conditions. Non-circular failure surface extending from the crest of the mound and through the upper part of the foundation to the highwall. Fully drained conditions. Ditto with r u = 0.. Ditto with r u = 0.4. Factor of Safety Notes Slip circles confined to the outer surface of the subsoil mound and are representative of minor unravelling only. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through almost the full length of the outer slope. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full length of the outer slope. Stable in short term. As above. Stable in short term Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from around the crest of the outer slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 8.5m from the toe. Stable in medium term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from around the crest of the outer slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 5.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from around the crest and upper part of the outer slope. They penetrate up to m into the foundation and extend about 4.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circle with the minimum factor of safety extends from the upper part of the outer slope. It penetrates up to.5m into the foundation and extends about 4.5m from the toe. Barely stable. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the toe of the mound and the upper part of the adjacent safety bench. Stable in short term. (Barely plausible). Not possible to generate plausible slip surfaces that extend through the mound and slope. Stable in medium term. Stable in short term. Stable in short term. Table D5 Summary of Slope Stability Analysis Results for Subsoil Storage Mounds D DABGeot/09059GA/Final
13 Geotechnical Assessment Report Location of Slip Circle Subsoil Mound Founded on Unit Soil Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5). Slip circles forced through foundation with adjacent excavation highwall. Fully and partly drained conditions. Non-circular failure surface extending from the crest of the mound and through the upper part of the foundation to the highwall. Fully drained conditions. Ditto with r u = 0.. Ditto with r u = 0.4. Factor of Safety Notes Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from around the crest of the outer slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 7m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the upper part of the outer slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 4m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the upper part of the outer slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 4m from the toe. Barely stable. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the upper part of the outer slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 5.5m from the toe. Barely stable. Not possible to generate plausible slip surfaces that extend through the mound and slope. Stable in short term. Stable in short term. Stable in short term. Table D6 Summary of Slope Stability Analysis Results for Subsoil Storage Mounds D DABGeot/09059GA/Final
14 Geotechnical Assessment Report Location of Slip Circle Subsoil Mound Founded on Unit 4 Soil Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5). Slip circles forced through foundation with adjacent excavation highwall. Fully and partly drained conditions. Non-circular failure surface extending from the crest of the mound and through the upper part of the foundation to the highwall. Fully drained conditions. Ditto with r u = 0.. Ditto with r u = 0.4. Factor of Safety Notes Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from around the crest and the upper part of the outer slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 5.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from around the crest and the upper part of the outer slope. They penetrate up to m into the foundation and extend about 4.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the upper part of the outer slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 5.5m from the toe. Barely stable. Slip circle with the minimum factor of safety extends from the upper part of the outer slope. It penetrates up to.5m into the foundation and extends about 3.5m from the toe. Unstable. Not possible to generate plausible slip surfaces that extend through the mound and slope. Stable in short term. Stable in short term. Stable in short term. Table D7 Summary of Slope Stability Analysis Results for Subsoil Storage Mounds D3 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
15 Geotechnical Assessment Report D4. Overburden Mounds Two overburden mounds will be constructed on the site: OBM located in the north, which will be partly founded on opencast backfill and will formed at a maximum height of 5m; and OBM in the western part of the site resting on natural ground at a height of not greater than 7m. The stability of these two mounds has again been assessed using Bishop s Simplified method for circular failure. The same foundation models were used as for the assessment of the topsoil and subsoil mounds, but with the addition of old opencast backfill, for which suitable shear strength parameters have been taken from the test records for the permitted Ferneybeds site: c = 6 kn/m and = 30º (bulk density. Mg/m 3 ). These parameters are representative of a clay rich fill and may well be conservative. The shear strength will be higher if more rock fragments are present. Two types of overburden material were considered: a moderately compacted weak rockfill and a clayfill comprising a remoulded mixture of Units and 3. The shear strength parameters for the rockfill were estimated using the data provided by Charles and Watts (980) and an average vertical stress value for each of the overburden mounds. A bulk density of.0 Mg/m 3 was adopted based on experience. The shear strength of the rockfill that will be produced at the site will be higher because it will contain significant proportions of moderately strong to strong sandstone. The parameters for the remoulded clay were taken from Table D and Appendix B. Fully drained and partly drained conditions were considered for the foundation. Section profiles were determined for the outer slopes of the mounds and the steepest overall slope was assessed for Mound OBM. This is almost identical to the eastern slope of OBM, but the western side of this mound was assessed because of the adjacent A68. Banks have designed the mounds with an 8 to m high, v in h (6.6 ) outer slope along the toe, but with a gently graded upper part to minimize visual intrusion. The topsoil and subsoil storage mounds will also provide a screen. The analysis results have been determined using a grid of circle centres and are again expressed as minimum factors of safety (Figures D58 to D). They are summarized in Tables D8 and D3 and are classified in the same manner as in Sections D and D3. D4 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
16 Geotechnical Assessment Report Location of Slip Circle Mainly Clayfill Founded on Old Opencast Backfill Slip circles with overall minimum factor of safety. Slip circles forced through point m behind crest of v in h slope. Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Mainly Clayfill Founded on Unit Factor of Safety Notes Slip circles confined to the outer surface of the mound and are representative of minor unravelling only. Barely stable conditions. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the v in h section of the outer slope. Barely stable conditions. Slip circle with the minimum factor of safety extends through the full height of the v in h section of slope. It penetrates up to 0.5m into the foundation and extends about 4.5m from the toe. Stable in medium term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 4.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5) Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 8m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 5.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the upper part of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 4.5m from the toe. Barely stable. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the upper part of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to m into the foundation and extend about 6m from the toe. Barely stable. Table D8 Summary of Slope Stability Analysis Results for Overburden Mound OBM D5 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
17 Geotechnical Assessment Report Location of Slip Circle Mainly Clayfill Founded on Unit 4 Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5). Rockfill Founded on Opencast Backfill Slip circles with overall minimum factor of safety. Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Factor of Safety Notes Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 5.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the crest and upper part of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 4.5m from the toe. Barely stable. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the upper part of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to m into the foundation and extend about 5.5m from the toe. Barely stable. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the upper part of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 4.5m from the toe. Unstable. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 4.5m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 4.5m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 5m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 3.5m into the foundation and extend about 5.5m from the toe. Stable in long term. Table D9 Summary of Slope Stability Analysis Results for Overburden Mound OBM D6 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
18 Geotechnical Assessment Report Location of Slip Circle Rockfill Founded on Unit Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5). Rockfill Founded on Unit 4 Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5). Factor of Safety Notes Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 5m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 3m into the foundation and extend about 5.5m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circle with the minimum factor of safety extends through the full height of the v in h section of slope. It penetrates up to 4m into the foundation and extends about 7.5m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 5.5m into the foundation and extend about 7m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 5.5m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 4m into the foundation and extend about 7.5m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 5.5m into the foundation and extend about 7m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 7.5m into the foundation and extend about 6m from the toe. Barely stable. Table D Summary of Slope Stability Analysis Results for Overburden Mound OBM D7 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
19 Geotechnical Assessment Report Location of Slip Circle Mainly Clayfill Founded on Unit Slip circles with overall minimum factor of safety. Slip circles forced through point m behind crest of v in h slope. Slip circles forced through point 4m behind crest of v in h slope. Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5). Factor of Safety Notes Slip circles confined to the outer surface of the mound and are representative of minor unravelling only. Barely stable conditions. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of the outer slope. Barely stable conditions. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of the outer slope. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 6.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the crest of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 4m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the crest and upper part of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 4m from the toe. Barely stable conditions. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the crest and the upper part of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 5.5m from the toe. Barely stable conditions. Table D Summary of Slope Stability Analysis Results for Overburden Mound OBM D8 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
20 Geotechnical Assessment Report Location of Slip Circle Mainly Clayfill Founded on Unit 4 Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5). Rockfill Founded on Unit Slip circles with overall minimum factor of safety. Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5). Factor of Safety Notes Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 0.5m into the foundation and extend about 4.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from around the crest and upper part of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 4m into the foundation and extend about 7.5m from the toe. Barely stable conditions. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the upper part of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 4.5m from the toe. Barely stable conditions. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend from the upper part of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to m into the foundation and extend about 3.5m from the toe. Unstable. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 3m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 3m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 3.5m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 4m into the foundation and extend about 6m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circle with the minimum factor of safety extends through the full height of the v in h section of slope. It penetrates up to 4m into the foundation and extends about 3.5m from the toe. Stable in short term. Table D Summary of Slope Stability Analysis Results for Overburden Mound OBM D9 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
21 Geotechnical Assessment Report Location of Slip Circle Rockfill Founded on Unit 4 Slip circles forced through foundation. Fully drained conditions. Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.4). Slip circles forced through foundation (r u = 0.5). Factor of Safety Notes Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to.5m into the foundation and extend about 3m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h section of slope. They penetrate up to 3.5m into the foundation and extend about 6m from the toe. Stable in long term. Slip circles with the minimum factor of safety extend through the full height of the v in h slope. They penetrate up to 3.5m into the foundation and extend about 6m from the toe. Stable in medium term. Slip circle with the minimum factor of safety extends through the full height of the v in h section of slope. It penetrates up to 3.5m into the foundation and extends about 4m from the toe. Stable in short term. Table D3 Summary of Slope Stability Analysis Results for Overburden Mound OBM The analysis results are considered to reflect very conservative conditions and the factors of safety are likely to be higher. In all cases, however, they show that the slip circles with the minimum factors of safety are focused on the steeper, v in h (6.6 ) section of the mounds outer slopes. Clayfill is the least stable overburden material and there is a risk that the outer slopes will slump where they are formed at v in h (6.6 ). The risk of bearing capacity failure will diminish as the pore pressures dissipate and the material consolidates, but any adverse effects will not be felt beyond the site boundary if the recommended standoffs are applied. The pore pressures used in the analysis will be lower at shallower depth and where drainage is facilitated by granular opencast backfill. The presence of topsoil and subsoil mounds will also serve to load the toe and increase the factors of safety. The quality of the overburden will also be variable. Remoulding of the clay material will only be partial and in many instances it will retain its in situ strength. High factors of safety and satisfactory levels of stability were achieved using the shear strength parameters for rockfill, which may also prove to be conservative. A mixture of clay and rockfill should therefore achieve the necessary degree of security for the two mounds. However, it is recommended that as much rockfill as possible is incorporated into the outer perimeters of the two mounds where the steeper profiles are to be formed. This bund should be at least 5m wide and should be formed as the mound level is raised to between 8 and m in height. The standoff between the mounds and the excavations will be sufficient to prevent significant interaction. D0 DABGeot/09059GA/Final
22 γ c 0 0 φ Topsoil Gmin.39 Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00:6:00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Gen.tal Proj : Scale : / 00 D4
23 γ c 0 0 φ Gmin.47 Topsoil Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00:8:5 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Gen.tal Proj : Scale : / 00 D5
24 γ c 0 0 φ Gmin.56 Topsoil Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00:0:05 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Gen.tal Proj : Scale : / 00 D6
25 γ c 0 0 φ Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously. Topsoil Gmin.67 Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00::37 Scale : / 00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Gen.tal Proj : D7
26 γ c 0 0 φ ru 0. Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously. Topsoil Gmin.54 Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00:4:48 Scale : / 00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Gen.tal Proj : D8
27 γ c 0 0 φ ru 0.4 Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously. Topsoil Gmin.37 Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00:8:09 Scale : / 00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Gen.tal Proj : D9
28 γ c 0 0 φ ru 0.5 Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously. Topsoil Gmin.5 Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00:7:0 Scale : / 00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Gen.tal Proj : D
29 γ c 0 0 φ Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously Gmin.67 Topsoil Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00:3:03 Scale : / 00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Exc.tal Proj : D
30 γ c 0 0 φ Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously. Ga-z.88 a Topsoil z Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00:4:35 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Exc.tal Proj : Scale : / 00 D
31 γ c 0 0 φ ru 0. Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously. Ga-z.7 a Topsoil z Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00:4:6 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Exc.tal Proj : Scale : / 00 D3
32 γ c 0 0 φ ru 0.4 Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously. Ga-z.5 a Topsoil z Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00:4:5 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Exc.tal Proj : Scale : / 00 D4
33 γ c 0 0 φ Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously Gmin.57 Topsoil Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 0:5:4 Scale : / 00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Gen.tal Proj : D5
34 γ c 0 0 φ ru 0. Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously Gmin.45 Topsoil Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 0:53:30 Scale : / 00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Gen.tal Proj : D6
35 γ c 0 0 φ ru 0.4 Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously Gmin.6 Topsoil Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 0:0:0 Scale : / 00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Gen.tal Proj : D7
36 γ c 0 0 φ ru 0.5 Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously. Topsoil Gmin.3 Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 0:05: Scale : / 00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Gen.tal Proj : D8
37 γ c 0 0 φ Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously Gmin.57 Topsoil Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 0::57 Scale : / 00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Exc.tal Proj : D9
38 γ c 0 0 φ ru 0. Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously Gmin.45 Topsoil Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 0::59 Scale : / 00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Exc.tal Proj : D0
39 γ c 0 0 φ Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously. Ga-z.75 a Topsoil z Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00:44:4 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Exc.tal Proj : Scale : / 00 D
40 γ c 0 0 φ ru 0. Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously. Ga-z.59 a Topsoil z Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00:45:6 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Exc.tal Proj : Scale : / 00 D
41 γ c 0 0 φ ru 0.4 Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously. Ga-z.44 a Topsoil z Unit Date : 05/07/00 Time : 00:45:59 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Exc.tal Proj : Scale : / 00 D3
42 γ c 0 0 φ Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously. Topsoil Gmin.48 Unit 4 Date : 05/07/00 Time : 0:55:47 Scale : / 00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit 4 Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Gen.tal Proj : D4
43 γ c 0 0 φ ru 0. Conditions concerning soils and are verified simultaneously. Topsoil Gmin.34 Unit 4 Date : 05/07/00 Time : 0:57:56 Scale : / 00 6m High Topsoil Mound Unit 4 Foundation v in h Outer Slopes File : Topsoil Gen.tal Proj : D5
1 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
February 14, 2017 Our File Ref.: 160796 Denis Lacroix 6909 Notre Dame Street Ottawa, Ontario K1C 1H6 Subject: Slope Stability Analysis 6909 Notre Dame Street Ottawa, Ontario Pursuant to your request, LRL
More informationCHAPTER 8 SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS
TM 5-818-1 / AFM 88-3. Chap. 7 CHAPTER 8 SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS 8-1. General. This chapter is concerned with characteristics and critical aspects of the stability of excavation slopes; methods of designing
More informationEAT 212 SOIL MECHANICS
EAT 212 SOIL MECHANICS Chapter 4: SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL PREPARED BY SHAMILAH ANUDAI@ANUAR CONTENT Shear failure in soil Drained and Undrained condition Mohr-coulomb failure Shear strength of saturated
More informationEFFECT OF COMPACTION ON THE UNSATURATED SHEAR STRENGTH OF A COMPACTED TILL
EFFECT OF COMPACTION ON THE UNSATURATED SHEAR STRENGTH OF A COMPACTED TILL Vanapalli, S.K., Pufahl, D.E., and Fredlund, D.G. (University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK., Canada, S7N 5A9) Abstract An experimental
More informationProf. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
22 Module 5: Lecture -4 on Stability of Slopes Sudden drawdown Determination of most critical slip surface Criteria for most critical slip surface = Minimum factor of safety Trial and error approach involves
More informationPILE FOUNDATIONS CONTENTS: 1.0 Introduction. 1.1 Choice of pile type Driven (displacement) piles Bored (replacement) piles. 2.
PILE FOUNDATIONS CONTENTS: 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Choice of pile type 1.1.1 Driven (displacement) piles 1.1.2 Bored (replacement) piles 2.0 Analysis 2.0.1 Driving formulae 2.0.2 Soil mechanics 2.1 Piles
More informationThis document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine
This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine Don t forget to visit our companion site http://www.vulcanhammer.org Use subject to the terms and conditions of the respective
More informationSlope stability assessment
Engineering manual No. 25 Updated: 03/2018 Slope stability assessment Program: FEM File: Demo_manual_25.gmk The objective of this manual is to analyse the slope stability degree (factor of safety) using
More informationDRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.3 STATIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES
DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.3 STATIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES Parsons P:\Honeywell -SYR\444576 2008 Capping\09 Reports\9.3 December 2009_Capping and
More informationRapid Drawdown with Multi-Stage
1 Introduction Rapid Drawdown with Multi-Stage Stability analysis during rapid drawdown is an important consideration in the design of embankment dams. During rapid drawdown, the stabilizing effect of
More informationCOMPARISON OF SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS OF BLACK COTTON SOIL WITH EFFECT OF RELATIVE COMPACTION
Vol-2 Issue-4 16 COMPARISON OF SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS OF BLACK COTTON SOIL WITH EFFECT OF RELATIVE COMPACTION Prof. Usha k. Patel Assistant Professor, LDCE Prof. M. G. Vanza Associate Professor, LDCE
More informationThe University of Iowa Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering SOIL MECHANICS 53:030 Final Examination 2 Hours, 200 points
The University of Iowa epartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering SOIL MECHNICS 53:030 Final Examination 2 Hours, 200 points Fall 1998 Instructor: C.C. Swan Problem #1: (25 points) a. In a sentence
More information[Gupta* et al., 5(7): July, 2016] ISSN: IC Value: 3.00 Impact Factor: 4.116
[Gupta* et al., 5(7): July, 6] ISSN: 77-9655 IC Value: 3. Impact Factor: 4.6 IJESRT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES & RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY EFFECT OF DENSITY AND MOISTURE ON THE SLOPE STABILITY
More informationCompaction. Compaction purposes and processes. Compaction as a construction process
Compaction Compaction purposes and processes Specification and quality control Moisture condition value Compaction is a process that brings about an increase in soil density or unit weight, accompanied
More informationShear Strength of Soils
Shear Strength of Soils Shear failure Soils generally fail in shear strip footing embankment failure surface mobilised shear resistance At failure, shear stress along the failure surface reaches the shear
More informationEFFECT OF RELICT JOINTS IN RAIN INDUCED SLOPE FAILURES IN RESIDUAL SOIL
EFFECT OF RELICT JOINTS IN RAIN INDUCED SLOPE FAILURES IN RESIDUAL SOIL Neethimappiriya Tharmalingam, Student (Email: neethi_26@yahoo.com) N.W.H. Lakshamana, Student (Email: hansaka8888@yahoo.com) R.D.T.B.
More informationLaboratory Tests to Determine Shear Strength of Soils
Triaxial Testing Laboratory Tests to Determine Shear Strength of Soils Geotechnical Engineering II (ENGI 6723) Presented by Rodney P. McAffee, Ph.D., P.Eng. Laboratory Tests to Determine Shear Lecture
More informationThe entire site supports grass on which sheep had been grazing recently.
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT FOR LAND AT HORSEHAY A^ Agricultural Land Classification of approximately 14 hectares of land to the southwest of Horsehay was undertaken in November 1989. The site lies
More informationA DETAILED ANALYSIS OF SLOPE STABILITY USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD (FEM)
A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF SLOPE STABILITY USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD (FEM) S. Halder 1*, M. O. Imam 2 & M. S. Basir 1 1 Department of Civil & Water Resources Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering
More informationProblems with Testing Peat for Stability Analysis
Problems with Testing Peat for Stability Analysis Dick Gosling & Peter Keeton Scottish Executive Document Published December 2006 Includes requirement for slope stability analysis using infinite slope
More informationThis document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine
This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine Don t forget to visit our companion site http://www.vulcanhammer.org Use subject to the terms and conditions of the respective
More informationAn Experimental Study on Variation of Shear Strength for Layered Soils
An Experimental Study on Variation of Shear Strength for Layered Soils Mr. Hemantkumar Ronad 1 DCE, M.Tech in Geotechnical Engg. Department of Civil Engineering 1, Basaveshwar Engineering College, Bagalkot-587102.
More informationBearing Capacity Theory. Bearing Capacity
Bearing Capacity Theory Bearing Capacity 1 Bearing Capacity Failure a) General Shear Failure Most common type of shear failure; occurs in strong soils and rocks b) Local Shear Failure Intermediate between
More informationAdvanced Foundation Engineering. Soil Exploration
Shahrood University of Technology Department of Geotechnical Engineering Advanced Foundation Engineering Soil Exploration Mohsen Keramati, Ph.D. Assistant Professor 1 - Introduction The field and laboratory
More informationAdvanced Foundation Engineering. Introduction
Shahrood University of Technology Department of Geotechnical Engineering Advanced Foundation Engineering Introduction Mohsen Keramati, Ph.D. Assistant Professor 1 - Detailed Course Plan Introduction (Geotechnical
More informationPROPOSED OPEN CAST COAL SITE SEPTEMBER 1992
AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS SKIERS SPRING, HOYLAND, SOUTH YORKSHIRE PROPOSED OPEN CAST COAL SITE SEPTEMBER 1992 ADAS LEEDS STATUTORY GROUP Job No. 98/92 MAFF
More informationLoad-Carrying Capacity of Stone Column Encased with Geotextile. Anil Kumar Sahu 1 and Ishan Shankar 2
Load-Carrying Capacity of Stone Column Encased with Geotextile Anil Kumar Sahu 1 and Ishan Shankar 2 1 Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India (sahuanilkr@yahoo.co.in)
More informationFINAL COVER VENEER STABILITY ANALYSES FOR SCA DESIGN
DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE SEDIMENT CONSOLIDATION AREA CIVIL & GEOTECHNICAL FINAL DESIGN 12B12BAPPENDIX L FINAL COVER VENEER STABILITY ANALYSES FOR SCA DESIGN p:\honeywell -syr\444853 - lake detail design\09
More informationSubsoil conditions are examined using test borings, provided by soil engineer (geotechnical).
SOIL & FOUNDATION TYPES: Subsurface investigations: Subsoil conditions are examined using test borings, provided by soil engineer (geotechnical). Number of borings and location of borings depends on building
More informationGary Person, Foundation Engineer Geotechnical Engineering Section
Minnesota Department of Transportation MEMO Mailstop 64 14 Gervais Avenue Maplewood, MN 9 DATE: November 3 rd, 214 TO: FROM: CONCUR: Bruce Johnson, Project Manager Metro Design Hossana Teklyes, Assist.
More informationGEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE
GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Prof. J. N. Mandal Department of civil engineering, IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India. Tel.022-25767328 email: cejnm@civil.iitb.ac.in Module - 7
More informationGEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE
GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Prof. J. N. Mandal Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India. Tel.022-25767328 email: cejnm@civil.iitb.ac.in Module - 8
More informationFull Scale Model Test of Soil Reinforcement on Soft Soil Deposition with Inclined Timber Pile
Full Scale Model Test of Soil Reinforcement on Soft Soil Deposition with Inclined Timber Pile Suheriyatna 1, L. Samang 2, M. W. Tjaronge 3 and T. Harianto 4 1 Doctoral Student, Department of Civil Engineering,
More informationReference No S053 MARCH 2012
A REPORT TO MARIANNEVILLE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED A SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ESTATES OF GLENWAY NEWMARKET GLENWAY GOLF CLUB DAVIS DRIVE WEST AND BATHURST STREET TOWN OF NEWMARKET
More informationGlobal Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management
ANALYSIS OF SOIL EFFECTIVE SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS CONSIDERING DIFFERENT SPECIMEN DIAMETERS IN TRIAXIAL TESTS Fernando Feitosa Monteiro*, Yago Machado Pereira de Matos, Mariana Campos Fontenelle, Beatriz
More informationSTATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION
STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION BIRKWOOD FARM, ALTOFTS WEST YORKSHIRE Proposed Opencast Extraction of Clay and coal ADAS January 1990 Leeds Regional Office File
More informationAnalysis of Pullout Resistance of Soil-Nailing in Lateritic Soil
Analysis of Pullout Resistance of Soil-Nailing in Lateritic Soil B,L.A. Isaka 1, B.C. Madushanka 1 and N.H. Priyankara 1 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty of Engineering University
More information1 Introduction. 2 General Pile Analysis Features. 2.1 Pile Internal Forces and Displacements
RSPile version 1.0 RSPile is a general pile analysis software for analyzing driven pile installation, axially loaded piles and laterally loaded piles. It is capable of computing the axial capacity for
More informationSwelling Treatment By Using Sand for Tamia Swelling Soil
Swelling Treatment By Using Sand for Tamia Swelling Soil G. E. Abdelrahman 1, M. M. Shahien 2 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Cairo University-Fayoum Branch, Fayoum, Egypt 2 Department of Civil Engineering,
More informationExamining soils in the field. Examining soils in the field. Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field
Examining soils in the field thinksoils Examining soils in the field Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field 31 Examining soils in the field 32 Environment Agency thinksoils examining
More information4 Slope Stabilization Using EPS Geofoam at Route 23A
Slope Stabilization Using EPS Geofoam at Route 23A 4.1 Introduction Geofoam introduced in recent years has provided solutions to a number of engineering problems. One of these problems is the slope stability
More informationConsolidation Stress Effect On Strength Of Lime Stabilized Soil
RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Consolidation Stress Effect On Strength Of Stabilized Soil K. Saranya*, Dr. M. Muttharam** *(Department of Civil Engineering, Research Scholar, Anna University, Chennai-25)
More informationTECHNICAL. Design Guide. Retaining walls made easy with this beautiful solution EARTH RETAINING WALLS
TECHNICAL Design Guide EARTH RETAINING WALLS Retaining walls made easy with this beautiful solution qro.com.au sales@qsolutionsco.com.au (07) 3881 0208 TDG-ERW-01 Sept 2017 1 RETAINING WALL SELECTION PROCEDURE
More informationRESPONSE OF ANCHOR IN TWO-PHASE MATERIAL UNDER UPLIFT
IGC 29, Guntur, INDIA RESPONSE OF ANCHOR IN TWO-PHASE MATERIAL UNDER UPLIFT K. Ilamparuthi Professor and Head, Division of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Anna University, Chennai 25, India.
More informationSoil Strength and Slope Stability
Soil Strength and Slope Stability J. Michael Duncan Stephen G. Wright @ WILEY JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC. CONTENTS Preface ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 C HAPTER 2 EXAMPLES AND CAUSES OF SLOPE FAILURE 5 Examples
More informationReinforcement with Geosynthetics
Reinforcement with Geosynthetics GEO-SLOPE International Ltd. www.geo-slope.com 1200, 700-6th Ave SW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2P 0T8 Main: +1 403 269 2002 Fax: +1 888 463 2239 Introduction Reinforced earth
More informationSoil-Structure Interaction of a Piled Raft Foundation in Clay a 3D Numerical Study
388 J. Eng. Technol. Sci., Vol. 48, No. 4, 2016, 388-407 Soil-Structure Interaction of a Piled Raft Foundation in Clay a 3D Numerical Study Endra Susila 1,* & Nita Anggraini 2 1 Geotechnical Engineering
More informationDam Construction by Stages
Dam Construction by Stages 1 Introduction This simple example demonstrates the simulation of staged embankment construction on soft ground. The primary objective of this example is to demonstrate the use
More informationExperimental investigation and theoretical modelling of soft soils from mining deposits
International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, September 3,, Seoul, Korea Experimental investigation and theoretical modelling of soft soils from mining deposits Herle, Ivo Institute
More informationCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION. Road transport is an only means of transport that offers itself to the whole community
1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Road transport is an only means of transport that offers itself to the whole community alike. It is accepted fact that of all the modes the transportation, road transport
More informationStress-Strain and Strength Behavior of Undrained Organic Soil in Kupondol, Kathmandu
TUTA/IOE/PCU Journal of the Institute of Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 113 118 TUTA/IOE/PCU All rights reserved. Printed in Nepal Fax: 977-1-5525830 Stress-Strain and Strength Behavior of Undrained Organic
More informationNumerical Analysis of the Bearing Capacity of Strip Footing Adjacent to Slope
International Journal of Science and Engineering Investigations vol. 4, issue 46, November 25 ISSN: 225-8843 Numerical Analysis of the Bearing Capacity of Strip Footing Adjacent to Slope Mohammadreza Hamzehpour
More informationAvailable online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 125 (2015 )
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Engineering 125 (2015 ) 331 337 The 5th International Conference of Euro Asia Civil Engineering Forum (EACEF-5) Effect of Area Development
More informationGUIDE FOR SELECTING AN APPROPRIATE METHOD TO ANALYZE THE STABILITY OF SLOPES ON RECLAIMED SURFACE MINES 1
GUIDE FOR SELECTING AN APPROPRIATE METHOD TO ANALYZE THE STABILITY OF SLOPES ON RECLAIMED SURFACE MINES 1 John J. Bowders, Jr. and Sun Chai Lee 2 Abstract: Geotechnical engineers have long Recognized the
More informationSlope Stability of Soft Clay Embankment for Flood Protection
Research Article Slope Stability of Soft Clay Embankment for Flood Protection Vannee Sooksatra and Pawinee Jinga* Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Rangsit University, Phaholyothin
More informationLessons Learned From the Failure of a GCL/Geomembrane Barrier on a Side Slope Landfill Cover
Lessons Learned From the Failure of a GCL/Geomembrane Barrier on a Side Slope Landfill Cover by G. N. Richardson, R. S. Thiel and W. A. Marr ABSTRACT: A sliding failure which occurred during construction
More information1. RETAINING WALL SELECTION PROCEDURE
1. RETAINING WALL SELECTION PROCEDURE a. Select the appropriate design table(s) depending on whether or not there are fences located above the retaining wall. Go to Section 3.1 or 4.1 of this document
More informationChapter 8 REMEDIAL MEASURES 8.1 FACETS IN HAZARD CATEGORY
Chapter 8 REMEDIAL MEASURES 8.1 FACETS IN HAZARD CATEGORY Stabilization of rock slope happens when the driving force acting on a potentially unstable rock slope is reduced, while the resisting force increases
More informationISO/TS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION. Geotechnical investigation and testing Laboratory testing of soil Part 10: Direct shear tests
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ISO/TS 17892-10 First edition 2004-10-15 Geotechnical investigation and testing Laboratory testing of soil Part 10: Direct shear tests Reconnaissance et essais géotechniques Essais
More informationEffect of Placement of Footing on Stability of Slope
Scientific Journal of Impact Factor (SJIF) : 3.134 ISSN (Print) : 2348-6406 ISSN (Online): 2348-4470 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development Effect of Placement of Footing
More informationTECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD PAGE 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No.
1. Report No. FHWA/LA.03/373 4. Title and Subtitle TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD PAGE 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 5. Report Date Evaluation of the Effect of Synthetic Fibers and
More informationBackfill Stress and Strain Information within a Centrifuge Geosynthetic-Reinforced Slope Model under Working Stress and Large Soil Strain Conditions
GeoCongress 2012 ASCE 2012 461 Yang, K-H., Zornberg, J.G., Liu, C-N. and Lin, H-D. (2012). Backfill Stress and Strain Information within a Centrifuge Geosynthetic-Reinforced Slope under Working Stress
More informationModified geotextile tube a new geotextile tube for optimized retaining efficiency and dewatering rate
Modified geotextile tube a new geotextile tube for optimized retaining efficiency and dewatering rate Hyeong-Joo Kim 1), Tae-Woong Park 2), Sung-Gil Moon 3), Hyeong-Soo Kim 4), Ri Zhang 5), and *Peter
More informationNON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY
Proposed Sand and Gravel Extraction and Associated Processing Operations with Restoration to a Mixture of Agriculture and Nature Conservation including Areas of Shallow Water at Hedgeley, Northumberland
More informationAN ASSESSMENT OF STRENGHT PROPERTIES OF. Diti Hengchaovanich and Nimal S. Nilaweera 1
ANASSESSMENTOFSTRENGHTPROPERTIESOF VETIVERGRASSROOTSINRELATIONTOSLOPE STABILIZATION DitiHengchaovanichandNimalS.Nilaweera 1 Introduction Vetivergrass(Vetiveriazizanioides)hasbeenutilizedto reducesoilerosioninmanycountriesthroughouttheworldfora
More informationREFERENCE NO S066 JUNE 2017
0 WEST BEAVER CREEK ROAD, SUITE #0, RICHMOND HILL, ONTARIO, L4B 1E TEL (416) 4-1 FAX (0) 1-33 A REPORT TO 2413 ONTARIO LTD. A GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT BETTY BOULEVARD
More informationSOIL SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS. Analyses of slopes can be divided into two categories: 6,Chapter 13 J. MICHAEL DUNCAN
6,Chapter 13 J. MICHAEL DUNCAN SOIL SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS Analyses of slopes can be divided into two categories: those used to evaluate the stability of slopes and those used to estimate slope movement.
More informationSubject Name: RESERVOIR AND FARM POND DESIGN (2+1) CONTENTS
Subject Name: RESERVOIR AND FARM POND DESIGN (2+1) CONTENTS (Name of Course Developer: Prof. B. C. Sahoo and Prof. S. N. Panda, AgFE Department, IIT Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721 302) Module 1: Fundamentals
More informationTransient Groundwater Analysis with Slope Stability
Transient Groundwater Analysis with Slope Stability 19-1 Transient Groundwater Analysis with Slope Stability This tutorial describes how to use Slide to calculate factors of safety for a dam subjected
More informationCompressibility and One Dimensional Consolidation of Soil
Compressibility and One Dimensional Consolidation of Soil ONE DIMENSIONAL SETTLEMENT BEHAVIOUR Initial condition U= u0 u0 is hydrostatic pore water pressure Effective stress, σo' Undrained loading U =
More informationFinite Element Methods against Limit Equilibrium Approaches for Slope Stability Analysis
Finite Element Methods against Limit Equilibrium Approaches for Slope Stability Analysis H. Khabbaz 1, B. Fatahi 1, C. Nucifora 1 1 Centre for Built Infrastructure Research, School of Civil and Environmental
More informationPULLOUT CAPACITY OF HORIZONTAL AND INCLINED PLATE ANCHORS IN CLAYEY SOILS
PULLOUT CAPACITY OF HORIZONTAL AND INCLINED PLATE ANCHORS IN CLAYEY SOILS BALESHWAR SINGH Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati Guwahati 78139, India
More informationLABORATORY STUDY ON THE CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT OF CLAY-FILLED GEOTEXTILE TUBE AND BAGS
Journal of GeoEngineering, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. Chew 41-45, et al.: April Laboratory 2011 Study on the Consolidation Settlement of Clay-Filled Geotextile Tube and Bags 41 LABORATORY STUDY ON THE CONSOLIDATION
More informationNumerical Analysis of Leakage through Geomembrane Lining Systems for Dams
The First Pan American Geosynthetics Conference & Exhibition 25 March 2008, Cancun, Mexico Numerical Analysis of Leakage through Geomembrane Lining Systems for Dams C.T. Weber, University of Texas at Austin,
More informationAPPENDIX E COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS AND EQUIPMENT
APPENDIX E COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS AND EQUIPMENT When the Materials Division designs a pavement structure, there are a number of factors that influence it s outcome. Projected traffic counts, percentage
More informationDETERMINATION OF BEARING CAPACITY FOR BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN IN OWO LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, ONDO STATE, NIGERIA ABSTRACT
DETERMINATION OF BEARING CAPACITY FOR BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN IN OWO LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ONDO STATE, NIGERIA OTUAGA, Philips Moses Department of Civil Engineering and Technology Rufus Giwa Polytechnic,
More informationEvaluation of undrained shear strength of soft New Orleans clay using piezocone
Evaluation of undrained shear strength of soft New Orleans clay using piezocone L. Wei & R. Pant HNTB Corporation, Baton Rouge, LA, USA M.T. Tumay Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA and Bogazici
More informationAPPLICATIONS IN FILTRATION AND DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL
Lecture 36 APPLICATIONS IN FILTRATION AND DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL Prof. G L Sivakumar Babu Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560012 Geotextile filter requirements:
More informationAGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS BIRCH PIT, NEAR COLCHESTER ESSEX
AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS BIRCH PIT, NEAR COLCHESTER ESSEX AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS SEMI-DETAILED SURVEY BIRCH PIT, NEAR
More informationEffect of pile sleeve opening and length below seabed on the bearing capacity of offshore jacket mudmats
NGM 2016 Reykjavik Proceedings of the 17 th Nordic Geotechnical Meeting Challenges in Nordic Geotechnic 25 th 28 th of May Effect of pile sleeve opening and length below seabed on the bearing capacity
More informationFine Coal Refuse 25 Years of Field and Laboratory Testing Data and Correlations
Fine Coal Refuse 25 Years of Field and Laboratory Testing Data and Correlations October 1, 2018 Blaise E. Genes Gonzalo Castro, Ph.D., P.E. Thomas O. Keller, P. E. Fatma Ciloglu, Ph.D., P. E. Presentation
More informationAssessment of Geotextile Reinforced Embankment on Soft Clay Soil
Assessment of Geotextile Reinforced Embankment on Soft Clay Soil M. Siavoshnia*, F. Kalantari and A. Shakiba Corresponding author: Civil Engineering Faculty, Neyaiesh Complex, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic
More informationTHREE DIMENSIONAL SLOPE STABILITY
THREE DIMENSIONAL SLOPE STABILITY Timothy D. Stark, Ph.D, PE Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 205 N. Mathews Ave. Urbana, IL 61801 (217)
More informationDevelopment of a Slope Stability Program for Transmission Towers
Development of a Slope Stability Program for Transmission Towers *Jung-Tae Kim 1), Youngjong Sim 2), Ah-Ram Kim 3), Gye-Chun Cho 4) and Dae-Hong Kim 5) 1), 3), 4) Department of Civil and Environmental
More informationPHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON
PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON Introduction Following the" request for detailed information on the physical characteristics of soil at Manor
More informationMAFF I^inistry of IfiriEE Agriculture Fisheries and Food
MAFF I^inistry of IfiriEE Agriculture Fisheries and Food AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION BROOMY HOLM FARM, EDMONDSLEY, CO DURHAM PROPOSED GOLF COURSE DECEMBER 1993 ADAS Leeds Statutory Group JobNo:- 168/93
More informationAGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS DALE PIT FARM. HATFIELD VOODHOUSE PROPOSED EXTRACTION OF SAND AHD GRAVEL ADAS April 1989 Leeds Regional office File Ref: 2FCS
More informationSTAFFORDSHIRE AND STOKE-ON- TRENT STRUCTURE PLAN Site 7: Priory Farm. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Report November 1998
STAFFORDSHIRE AND STOKE-ON- TRENT STRUCTURE PLAN Site 7: Priory Farm Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Report November 1998 A J Spalding Resource Planning Team RPT Reference: 008/98 & 25/RPT/Ol
More informationGEOMEMBRANE FIELD INSTALLATION
GEOMEMBRANE FIELD INSTALLATION CONTENTS Introduction Quality Control and Quality Assurance Types of lining systems Basic Lining Design Executive Lining Design Basic Lining Design Specification Executive
More informationKeywords: slope stability, numerical analysis, rainfall, infiltration. Yu. Ando 1, Kentaro. Suda 2, Shinji. Konishi 3 and Hirokazu.
Proceedings of Slope 25, September 27-3 th 25 SLOPE STABLITY ANALYSIS REGARDING RAINFALL-INDUCED LANDSLIDES BY COUPLING SATURATED-UNSATURATED SEEPAGE ANALYSIS AND RIGID PLASTIC FINITE ELEMENT METHOD Yu.
More informationStability analysis of slopes with surcharge by LEM and FEM
International Journal of Advanced Structures and Geotechnical Engineering ISSN 2319-5347, Vol. 04, No. 04, October 2015 Stability analysis of slopes with surcharge by LEM and FEM MD. MONIRUZZAMAN MONI,
More informationLoading unsaturated soil. *Mohamed Abdellatif Ali Albarqawy 1)
The 2012 World Congress on Advances in Civil, Environmental, and Materials Research (ACEM 12) Seoul, Korea, August 26-30, 2012 Loading unsaturated soil *Mohamed Abdellatif Ali Albarqawy 1) 1) Faculty of
More informationTest Pit Observation Report. Albertville Business Park 67th Street to 70th Street NE Albertville, Minnesota. Prepared for.
Test Pit Observation Report Albertville Business Park 67th Street to 70th Street NE Albertville, Minnesota Prepared for Fehn Companies Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this plan, specification,
More informationUnsaturated Shear Strength Behavior under Unconsolidated Undrained Tests
Unsaturated Shear Strength Behavior under Unconsolidated Undrained Tests Majid Sokhanvar 1, Ir. Dr. Azman Kassim 2 1: Master of Engineering (Civil- Geotechnics), Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti
More informationSoil Structure, Density, and Porosity. Laboratory #4
Soil Structure, Density, and Porosity Laboratory #4 Objectives Understand the concept of soil structure and how it differs from soil texture. Understand how soil structure influences other soil properties.
More informationIndirect Design Comparison of the structural strength of the pipe (Three- Edge-Bearing Test) to the field supporting strength of a buried pipe.
2 Indirect Design Comparison of the structural strength of the pipe (Three- Edge-Bearing Test) to the field supporting strength of a buried pipe. Direct Design The design of pipe in the installed condition.
More informationMAFF Ministry of Ifinil Agriculture Rsheries and Food
MAFF Ministry of Ifinil Agriculture Rsheries and Food STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION SHILBOTTLE COLLIERY RECLAMATION SCHEME NORTHUMBERLAND DECEMBER 1994 ADAS
More informationStudy on Effect of Water on Stability or Instability of the Earth Slopes
International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 2014 Available online at www.irjabs.com ISSN 2251-838X / Vol, 8 (9): 1482-1487 Science Explorer Publications Study on Effect of Water on Stability
More informationAGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS SEGHILL, NORTHUMBERLAND PROPOSED VASTE DISPOSAL SITE ADAS January 1989 Leeds Regional Office REF: 3/89 2FCS 4191 lds.rpg3.seghill
More informationReference No S082
A REPORT TO DUNPAR DEVELOPMENTS INC. A SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED 3.-STOREY TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT 28, 2168, 2180 AND 2192 TRAFALGAR ROAD TOWN OF OAKVILLE Reference No. 120-S082 JUNE 2012 DISTRIBUTION
More information