VISUAL RESOURCES 1. INTRODUCTION 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS. a. Visual Character

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "VISUAL RESOURCES 1. INTRODUCTION 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS. a. Visual Character"

Transcription

1 IV.A VISUAL RESOURCES 1. INTRODUCTION This section addresses the potential changes in visual character that would result from implementation of the proposed Wilshire and La Brea Project. Also evaluated are the impacts of light and glare, and the impact of changes in shade and shadow patterns. 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS a. Visual Character The proposed Wilshire and La Brea Project would be located in the Wilshire Community Plan Area of Los Angeles. The visual character of the area is urban with a variety of building heights, building types, and densities. The visual character of the Miracle Mile District, which is located directly adjacent to the project site to the west, is characterized by numerous high-rise office buildings along Wilshire Boulevard. Several of these high-rise tower buildings are visible from the project site. In addition, several high-rise tower buildings along the Wilshire Corridor are also visible to the east from higher vantage points on the project site. The Miracle Mile District contains about 20 historic buildings that were built during the 1920s and 1930s. Three of the buildings are classified as City Cultural Monuments while the remaining buildings are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The project site is located next to two of these historic structures, the E. Clem Wilson Tower Building at Wilshire Boulevard and the Zephyr Club, located at 5209 Wilshire Boulevard. The project site is located on the southeast corner of Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue, immediately south of the Wilson Tower and the Zephyr Club. The site is presently occupied by a church and commercial strip center. The church is a three-story (plus basement) reinforced concrete building that has a flat roof and a rectangle plan that was formerly occupied by a bank. The building is an example of Late Modern expression combining aspects of Brutalism and International Style architecture. The commercial strip center is a single-story structure that was formally an automobile dealership. The building is an example of the Art Deco style of construction that is prevalent in the area. Refer to Section III, General Description of Environmental Setting, for photographs of the project site and detailed descriptions of surrounding land uses. Traveling north and south on La Brea Avenue provides views of the existing E. Clem Wilson Tower Building. Constructed in 1932, the Wilson Tower is an example of Streamline Moderne architecture. Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-1 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

2 Constructed in 1929, the Zephyr Club is an example of Art Deco architecture. Neither the Wilson Tower nor the Zephyr Club have been found eligible for listing on either the National Register of Historic Resources or California Register of Historic Resources, as discussed in detail in the Cultural Resources Technical Report. b. Off-Site Views Existing off-views of the project site are described below. Existing off-site views from each corner of the project site are depicted in Figures IV.A-1 and IV.A-2, Existing Off-Site Views. Southeast Corner of Sycamore Avenue and 8 th Street Photo 1, Figure IV.A-1 provides a southeast view from the project site at the corner of Sycamore Avenue and 8 th Street. As shown, multi-family residential uses and the streetscape dominate the foreground. No long- and/or mid-range views are visible in the distance. Northeast Corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Sycamore Avenue Photo 2, Figure IV.A-1 provides a northeast view from the project site at the corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Sycamore Avenue. As illustrated, an automobile dealership and the streetscape dominate the foreground. A commercial strip center is also partially visible to the east. Long- to mid-range views of residential and commercial development along the Wilshire Boulevard Corridor to the east of the project site are also visible. Northwest Corner of Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue Photo 1, Figure IV.A-2 provides a northwest view from the project site at the corner of Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue. As shown, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) customer center and the intersection dominate the foreground. Mid-range views of multi-family residential and commercial office buildings are also visible along Wilshire Boulevard to the west while mid-range views of commercial retail buildings along La Brea to the north are visible to the north. Long-range views of the Hollywood Hills are also visible along La Brea Avenue to the north. Southwest Corner of La Brea Avenue and 8 th Street Photo 2, Figure IV.A-2 provides a southwest view from the project site at the corner of La Brea Avenue and 8 th Street. As illustrated, commercial-retail uses and the streetscape, including billboards, dominate the foreground. A tire store is also partially visible to the south. No long- and/or mid-range views are visible in the distance. Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-2 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

3 Photo 1: West 8th Street & Sycamore Avenue n NOT TO SCALE SOURCE: Impact Sciences, Inc. - May /07 Photo 2: Wilshire Boulevard & Sycamore Avenue FIGURE IV.A-1 Existing Off-Site Views

4 Photo 1: Wilshire Boulevard & La Brea Avenue n NOT TO SCALE SOURCE: Impact Sciences, Inc. - May /07 Photo 2: West 8th Street & La Brea Avenue FIGURE IV.A-2 Existing Off-Site Views

5 c. On-Site Views Existing views of the project site are described below. Existing on-site views from each corner of the project site are depicted in Figures IV.A-3 and IV.A-4, Existing On-Site Views. Southeast Corner of Sycamore Avenue and 8 th Street Photo 1, Figure IV.A-3, provides a view northwest across the project site from the intersection of Sycamore Avenue and 8 th Street. As shown, the parking lot behind the commercial strip center, which is surrounded by a small brick wall with iron fencing, dominates the foreground. Long- to mid-range views of the church on the project site and the Wilson Tower located at the corner of Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue are visible in the distance along with billboards located along La Brea Avenue. Northeast Corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Sycamore Avenue Photo 2, Figure IV.A-3, provides a view southwest across the project site from the intersection of Wilshire Boulevard and Sycamore Avenue. As illustrated, the church on the project site and the church parking lot, which is surrounded by a small brick wall with a hedgerow along the north side, dominate the foreground. Long- to mid-range views of billboards and signage along Wilshire Boulevard are also visible. Finally, long-range views of high-rise structures located in the heart of the Miracle Mile District to the west are also visible. Northwest Corner of Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue Photo 1, Figure IV.A-4, provides a view southeast across the project site from the intersection of Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue. As shown, the church on the project site, which is a converted bank building, and signage associated with the church dominates the foreground. A mid-range view of the commercial strip center on the project site and a billboard along La Brea Avenue are visible. A mid-rise building along Wilshire Boulevard to the east of the project site is also visible. No long-range views are visible. Southwest Corner of La Brea Avenue and 8 th Street Photo 2, Figure IV.A-4, provides a view northeast across the project site from the intersection of La Brea Avenue and 8 th Street. As illustrated, the commercial strip center on the project site along with signage and a billboard dominates the foreground. In addition, commercial establishments located to the south and to the west are also prominently featured. Long- to mid-range views of the church and E. Clem Wilson Tower Building are also visible to the north. Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-5 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

6 d. Scenic Vistas The project site is located in the Wilshire Community Plan Area of Los Angeles. As discussed above, the project site is situated on the southeastern intersection of Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue. The Scenic Highway Plan, adopted in 1978 and incorporated into the Transportation Element of the City of Los Angeles General Plan, designates Wilshire Boulevard as a scenic highway due to its nature as a highly urbanized high-rise corridor. The project would be set within the existing urban and high-rise setting of the Wilshire Boulevard Corridor. Views from the project site are of buildings and other urban features immediately surrounding the site. The grid street layout does allow for longer-distance views of tower buildings in the Miracle Mile District to the west, Wilshire Boulevard Corridor to the east, and the Hollywood Hills to the north e. Shade and Shadow Shade can adversely affect visual character if shadow-sensitive land uses are denied expected sunlight. Though all land use types benefit from solar access, residential uses are generally recognized as the most shadow sensitive, primarily because shading can eliminate passive solar heating, and thus, cause increased energy consumption. Exterior recreation spaces and other gathering places are also considered shadow-sensitive uses. The extent and direction of a shadow is dependent upon the angle of the sun, which changes throughout the day, depending on the time of day and the time of year. The sun traverses the southern sky from east to west. As a result, morning shadows are cast to the west, midday shadows are cast to the north, and afternoon shadows are cast to the east. The longest shadows are cast in the morning and evening and during the winter months. The shortest shadows are cast at midday and during the summer months. Shadows cast from the existing structures on the project site primarily shade the adjoining parking lot in the mornings and adjoining streets and sidewalks along Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue during midday and during the afternoon. Shadows are also cast by surrounding structures, particularly the taller structures in the area such as the E. Clem Wilson Tower Building. f. Nighttime Lighting The project site is located in an urban setting characterized by high levels of nighttime lighting. Nighttime lighting sources include street lighting on surrounding roadways, such as Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue; security lighting of neighboring buildings and land uses; interior nighttime lighting of commercial-retail and office buildings, residences, and other uses surrounding the project site emanating from windows; and general urban lighting. Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-6 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

7 Photo 1: West 8th Street & Sycamore Avenue n NOT TO SCALE SOURCE: Impact Sciences, Inc. - May /07 Photo 2: Wilshire Boulevard & Sycamore Avenue FIGURE IV.A-3 Existing On-Site Views

8 Photo 1: Wilshire Boulevard & La Brea Avenue n NOT TO SCALE SOURCE: Impact Sciences, Inc. - May /07 Photo 2: West 8th Street & La Brea Avenue FIGURE IV.A-4 Existing On-Site Views

9 Reflective light or glare is primarily a daytime phenomenon caused by sunlight reflecting from highly finished surfaces, such as window glass or other reflective materials, and to a lesser degree from lightly colored surfaces. Typically, the primary cause of adverse glare is buildings with exterior façades of highly reflective glass or mirror-like material that reflect the sun when it is at a low angle following sunrise and prior to sunset. Nighttime illumination of commercial buildings causes light to be cast onto surrounding uses. The existing structures on the project site do not presently create substantial glare as these buildings have either façades of concrete, stucco, non-reflective glass, or other non-reflective materials. 3. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK a. Wilshire Community Plan The Wilshire Community Plan of the City of Los Angeles General Plan includes urban design policies and guidelines to ensure that private residential, commercial, and industrial projects, as well as public spaces and rights-of-way, incorporate specific elements of good design to promote a stable and pleasant environment. 1 In commercial areas, the policies and guidelines emphasize the provision and maintenance of the visual continuity of streetscapes, and the creation of an environment that encourages both pedestrian and economic activity. The intent is to help establish identifiable neighborhoods fostered by commercial settings, which contribute to the social life and economic vitality of the Wilshire Community Plan Area. In particular, the policies and guidelines focus on site planning, pedestrian orientation, building height and design, parking structures, surface parking landscaping, light and glare, and mixed use. b. Miracle Mile Community Overlay District The Miracle Mile Community Design Overlay District (CDO) provides guidelines and standards for public and private development projects in commercially zoned areas along the Miracle Mile. The intent of the CDO is to provide guidance and direction in the design of new and rehabilitation of existing buildings and storefronts in order to improve the appearance, enhance the identity and promote the pedestrian environment of the district. 2 In particular, the guidelines and standards focus on site planning and the architectural features of new buildings, the rehabilitation of historic structures, parking, landscaping, and signage. 1 Wilshire Community Plan. City of Los Angeles Planning Department. V-2. 2 Miracle Mile Community Design Overlay District. City of Los Angeles Planning Department. 2. Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-9 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

10 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS a. Significance Criteria The L.A. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Thresholds Guide requires that the determination of impacts to visual resources are made on a case-by-case basis, considering the following factors: Visual Character The amount or relative proportion of existing features or elements that substantially contribute to the valued visual character or image of a neighborhood, community or localized area which would be removed, altered, or demolished. The amount of natural open space to be graded or developed. The degree to which proposed structures in natural open areas would be effectively integrated into the aesthetics of the site, through appropriate design, etc. The degree of contrast between the proposed features and existing features that represent the area s valued aesthetic image. The degree to which a proposed zone change would result in buildings that would detract from existing style or image of the area due to density, height, bulk, setback, signage, or other physical elements. The degree to which the project would contribute to the area s aesthetics value. Applicable guidelines and regulations. Scenic Vistas The nature and quality of recognized or valued views (such as natural topography; settings; man-made or natural features of visual interest and resources, such as mountains or the ocean). Whether the project affects views from a designated scenic highway, corridor or parkway. The extent of obstruction (e.g., total blockage, partial interruption or minor diminishment). The extent to which the project affects recognized views available from a length of a public roadway, bike path or trail, as opposed to a single, fixed vantage point. Shade and Shadow A project impact would normally be considered significant if shadow-sensitive uses would be shaded by project-related structures for more than 3 hours between the hours of 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM Pacific Standard Time (between late October and early April) or for more than 4 hours Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-10 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

11 between the hours of 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time (between early April and late October). Nighttime Lighting The change in ambient illumination levels as a result of project sources. The extent to which project lighting would spill off the project site and affect adjacent light-sensitive areas. b. Project Impacts Visual Character of the Proposed Project The proposed structure would consist of three to six levels of apartment dwellings atop an elevated base, which would be approximately 20 feet above street level at the Wilshire Boulevard end of the property and approximately 28 feet above street level at 8 th Street. In its current concept layout, the building is a series of five linearly arranged masses, four stories in height, and oriented in an east-west direction on a three-story-high base. These linear masses partially enclose landscaped courtyards between them at the third-story level, as the massings are connected at their western end with a linear mass that runs perpendicular fronting La Brea Avenue, while the eastern end of the courtyards remain open. Therefore, the building is a total of seven stories in height with continuous frontage on three of the streets upon which it faces: Wilshire Boulevard, La Brea Avenue, and 8 th Street. On the Sycamore Avenue side, the continuous frontage along the street is three stories in height, while the narrow ends of the five linear masses running east to west are set back at this third-story level, creating an alternating rhythm of solid building punctuated by landscaped courtyards. The courtyards would open to the east to take advantage of city skyline views and to provide a more articulated building face to the adjacent residential neighborhood on Sycamore Avenue. The secondary bar building would be used, together with the flats at grade, to diminish the height of the structure as it fronts Sycamore Avenue, and would provide mass, bulk, and scale that is more consistent with the residential structures located at the east side of the street. The skin of the building would be composed primarily of exterior plaster. The exterior would also feature accent materials of composite aluminum siding, decorative block or stone cladding, cement fiberboard, and perforated metal. Balcony railings would include plaster, metal shapes, and glass railing systems. The proposed building would be a horizontally oriented rectangular mass that is relatively short in height in comparison to the urban fabric that surrounds it. The building would be built out to form a relatively consistent street wall along Wilshire Boulevard, La Brea Avenue, and 8 th Street where the habitable space would be approximately 100 feet in height and the highest building element, at the corner of Wilshire Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-11 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

12 Boulevard and La Brea Avenue, would reach to approximately 130 feet in height. The three-story-high mass fronting Sycamore Avenue would be approximately 45 feet high. The proposed project would enhance the surrounding pedestrian environment by providing planters, building recesses, awnings, and other scale elements. On Sycamore Avenue, a 15-foot-wide linear park and an interpretive garden at the corner of Sycamore Avenue and 8 th Street would be available for use by both residents of the building and the neighborhood. Impacts related to visual character are considered significant for the proposed project based on The amount or relative proportion of existing features or elements that substantially contribute to the valued visual character or image of a neighborhood, community or localized area that would be removed, altered, or demolished. The proposed project involves the demolition of existing on-site structures. As determined by the Cultural Resources Technical Report prepared for the proposed project, the existing structures do not qualify as historical resources. In addition, the buildings do not substantially contribute to the valued visual character of the area as it offers no distinct or aesthetically valuable features. As such, no potential for significant impacts would occur with respect to the removal of visually valued features or elements in the project vicinity. Impacts related to visual character are considered significant for the proposed project based on The amount of natural open space to be graded or developed; and The degree to which proposed structures in natural open areas would be effectively integrated into the aesthetics of the site, through appropriate design, etc. No natural open space areas currently exist either on or in the vicinity of the project site; therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not affect natural open spaces areas in the Wilshire Community Plan Area of Los Angeles, and there is no potential for significant impacts. Impacts related to visual character are considered significant for the proposed project based on: The degree to which a proposed zone change would result in buildings that would detract from existing style or image of the area due to density, height, bulk, setback, signage or other physical elements. The proposed project site is currently zoned as [Q] C4-2-CDO along Wilshire Boulevard, C2-1 along La Brea Avenue, and [Q] C2-1 along Sycamore Avenue. As stated in Section IV.G, Land Use, implementation of the project will require that the entire site be rezoned as a [T] [Q] C4-2 zone. The C-4 zone allows up to 93 specific commercial and residential uses. Uses proposed for the Wilshire and Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-12 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

13 La Brea Project, including residential, retail, restaurant, and parking uses, are all allowed within the C4 zone. As such, there is no potential for significant impacts. Impacts related to visual character are also considered significant for the proposed project based on The degree of contrast between the proposed features and existing features that represent the area s valued aesthetic image. As discussed above, a three-story church and a single-story commercial strip center presently occupy the site. The proposed project involves the demolition of existing on-site structures. The construction of a new base structure with retail under the base and two residential structures that would sit on top of the base would replace these structures. Implementation of the project would increase the density and intensity of development on the project site. In addition, the finger building would be approximately 100 feet from street level to the top of the highest point of the roof, while the bar building would be approximately 45 feet above grade. The proposed project includes features, described below, to minimize the degree of contrast between existing and proposed development. Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue, both wide streets with high volume vehicle traffic, are characterized by commercial uses. These two commercial streets have broad sidewalks with almost no street trees, and buildings are generally constructed to the lot lines with a solid building mass and pedestrian-oriented ground floor. In this type of urban, commercial environment, the setting is typified by the relationship of buildings to each other and to the street, pedestrian access and orientation, setbacks, and views. In contrast to Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue, in particular, Sycamore Avenue displays a distinctive low-scale, residential character with relatively low traffic volume, tree-lined sidewalks separated from the street by a planting strip or parkway, and landscaped front yard setbacks. In this type of urban, residential environment, the setting is typified by the relationship of buildings to the street, sidewalk area, setbacks, and views. 8 th Street, as a minor arterial, has smaller scale development than either Wilshire Boulevard or La Brea Avenue. Much of it is still commercial, but the low-density buildings, such as the low-lying Firestone Tire and Rubber Building, provide a transition typical of that often found between areas of high-density commercial development and low-scale residential. As proposed, the massing and articulation of each of the façades respective of its location on the project site addresses its specific context. The proposed building incorporates many of the features characteristic of the commercial district in which it will be placed and makes many references to the relationship Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-13 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

14 between height and mass in adjacent historical resources. The proposed building incorporates many features of the styling of two historical resources directly across the project site, the E. Clem Wilson Building on Wilshire Boulevard, and the Firestone Tire and Rubber building on 8 th Street. Of particular importance are the northwest and southwest corners of the new building as these are both the locations of closest proximity to adjacent resources, as well as the most visible and prominent parts of the building as they are on major arterials. Therefore, the building features distinctive design elements at each of these corners that respond to their immediate settings. While design features alluding to these historical resources are given special prominence at the corners, they are also carried across the façades in a more subdued fashion so that the entire building exhibits a unity in its design. An established pattern of tall buildings with distinctive tower elements characterizes the immediate commercial surroundings, and it is at the corner of Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue that the new building would rise to its highest point. A planar vertical fin would reference the vertical decorative treatment employed on the E. Clem Wilson Building. This corner of the building also reflects bulk and massing seen on the E. Clem Wilson Building. The proposed building is several stories shorter than the tallest of the nearby historical resources, including the E. Clem Wilson Building; however, it draws upon many of the features from this historical precedent in its scale and massing. Concerning the existing residential neighborhood on Sycamore Avenue to the east, the courtyards would open to the east to take advantage of city skyline views and to provide a more articulated building face to the adjacent residential neighborhood on Sycamore Avenue. The secondary bar building would be used, together with the flats at grade, to diminish the height of the structure as it fronts Sycamore Avenue, and would provide mass, bulk, and scale that is more consistent with the residential structures located at the east side of the street. At the corner of La Brea Avenue and 8 th Street, a vertically oriented, curved corner element announces the retail space that runs the length of La Brea Avenue. This curved element breaks the otherwise continuous elevation of linear retail storefronts; it is both taller and more solid in its massing. The curved element at this corner is a contemporary interpretation of the Streamline Moderne canopy style featured at the Firestone Tire and Rubber retail store across 8 th Street from this corner of the project site. The proposed building has two very different contexts that it must address: the mixed commercial and residential areas of Wilshire Boulevard, La Brea Avenue, and 8 th Street to the north, west and south; and the residential area of Sycamore Avenue to the east. Therefore, the proposed building addresses these contexts differently. While the north, west, and south façades of the proposed building clearly address mixed-use commercial and residential areas, the east façade of the proposed building fronts the low-scale residential development of Sycamore Avenue. Therefore, to the east, the mass of the building steps down to three stories in height as it approaches buildings of a lower scale. On this façade, the four highest stories are set back from the street upon a three-story height base, and this serves to diminish the Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-14 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

15 perceived height from street level. Furthermore, rather than the building being a unified linear mass on this façade, as it is on the other three façades, it is broken up into five tower-like massings separated by landscaped courtyards above the base podium level, so that the decreased density respects the residential character of the existing neighborhood. Only the narrow ends of the seven-story high massings are visible from the street, and the solidity of each tower alternates with the openness created by each courtyard. The massing of the building is further broken down at the street level, defined by the building s three-story height. For these reasons, the degree of contrast between the proposed features and existing features would not be substantial. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant. Impacts related to visual character are also considered significant for the proposed project based on The degree to which the project would contribute to the area s aesthetics value. Existing buildings on the project site represent a mix of architectural styles. The church is an example of Late Modern expression combining aspects of Brutalism and International Style architecture while the commercial strip center is an example of the Art Deco style of architecture that is prevalent in the area. Furthermore, while the church building has not been substantially altered since it was originally constructed, the commercial strip center has undergone extensive alterations, thus changing its original design. For these reasons, the buildings on the project site do not substantially contribute to the aesthetic value of the area. As such, there is no potential for significant impacts. Applicable guidelines and regulations. Implementation of the proposed project would be subject to the urban design policies and guidelines outlined in the Wilshire Community Plan and guidelines and standards listed in the Miracle Mile CDO. The design, as proposed, implements these policies, guidelines, and standards through Wilshire Community Plan Maximizing pedestrian oriented retail and commercial service uses along street grade level frontages adjacent to the project site; Separating adjacent residential uses located to the east of the project site across Sycamore Avenue from the proposed project with townhouse units; Encouraging a pedestrian-only walkway between commercial uses located on Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue and the interior parking garage; Providing pedestrian-oriented ground-floor uses, and maximizing the amount of building area devoted to ground-level display windows and display cases, store front glass, doors, windows, Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-15 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

16 and other transparent elements on front façades in an effort to afford pedestrian views into the proposed retail and restaurant space; Differentiating the building frontage along Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue between the ground floor and second floor with balconies, offset planes, and other architectural details; Maximizing the application of architectural features and articulations on the proposed building façade; and Locating surface and above-grade parking within the interior of the proposed structure and locating access driveways on side streets such as Sycamore Avenue and 8 th Street. Miracle Mile Community Design Overlay District Encouraging pedestrian activity along adjacent sidewalks by orienting the proposed structure towards the intersection of Wilshire Boulevard and La Brea Avenue; Locating vehicle access and loading areas within the interior of the proposed structure, thereby minimizing potential physical and/or visual impacts on pedestrians, the flow of traffic, and/or adjacent uses; Reducing the monotony of the proposed structure through the use of varied materials; Providing a dominant Wilshire Boulevard entryway that reinforces the character of the building and adds visual interest, thus creating an inviting entrance; Designing the proposed structure to achieve consistency with the neighboring E. Clem Wilson Building though the provision of decorative horizontal roof planes and articulated tower elements that reflect the height of the cornices, setbacks, and terraces that are featured on the Wilson Tower; Promoting an active pedestrian district by incorporating attractive and functional storefronts into the proposed structure. Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with applicable urban design policies and guidelines outlined in the Wilshire Community Plan nor would implementation of the proposed project conflict with applicable guidelines and standards listed in the Miracle Mile CDO. Therefore, there is no potential for significant impacts with respect to conflicts with applicable guidelines and regulations. Scenic Vistas Impacts related to visual character are considered significant for the proposed project based on The nature and quality of recognized or valued views (such as natural topography, settings, man-made or natural features of visual interest and resources such as mountains or the ocean); and The extent of obstruction (e.g., total blockage, partial interruption, or minor diminishment). Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-16 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

17 A description of existing on-site views was discussed above in Subsection 2, Existing Conditions. A discussion of the changes to these views resulting from project implementation is provided below. Implementation of the proposed project would block a majority of all views across the project site. However, the three-story existing church and commercial strip center already block a majority of all views across the project site, especially of the Hollywood Hills to the north. Similarly, the mass of the proposed structure would further limit these views. Current scenic views are either partially or fully obstructed from the project site. Also, the proposed project does not significantly degrade scenic views off site and residents on the upper floors of the completed project will have enhanced views. Therefore, impacts to scenic vistas associated with the proposed project are less than significant. Impacts related to visual character are considered significant for the proposed project if they would conflict with Whether the project affects views from a designated scenic highway, corridor or parkway; The project site is located in the heart of the Wilshire Boulevard Corridor. As stated previously, Wilshire Boulevard along the northern border of the project site has been designated as a Scenic Highway due to its nature as a highly urbanized high-rise corridor. Implementation of the proposed project would introduce a new base structure to the project site with two residential structures. Overall, the finger building would be a maximum of 100 feet above grade, and the bar building would be up to 44 feet above grade. Both of these residential structures would contribute to the expected urban visual characteristics of the existing Wilshire Boulevard Corridor skyline but would not obstruct a critical feature or interfere with its aesthetic character. The new residential structures would be visible from vantage points around the project site but would not obstruct, affect, or prevent views from the designated Scenic Highway. The addition of the proposed project to the Wilshire Boulevard Corridor skyline would not result in the potential for significant impacts to scenic vistas. Impacts related to scenic vistas are considered significant for the proposed project if The extent to which the project affects recognized views available from a length of a public roadway, bike path or trail, as opposed to a single, fixed vantage point. As stated above, the view of the Miracle Mile District from Wilshire Boulevard would change somewhat with implementation of the proposed project. Views along neighboring streets within the project vicinity, including along La Brea Avenue, Sycamore Avenue, and 8 th Street would also change with project Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-17 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

18 implementation. Long-range views in the area are already limited due to the dense urban setting; however, the addition of a new base building to the project site with two residential structures would change the views along neighboring streets as far as they are visible. These structures are intended, in part, to improve the visual character of the area and are consistent with surrounding land uses and the scale and massing of other nearby tower buildings. As such, no potential for significant impacts would occur. Shade and Shadow Impacts related to shade and shadows are considered significant if Shadow-sensitive uses would be shaded by project-related structures for more than 3 hours between the hours of 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM Pacific Standard Time (between late October and early April) or for more than 4 hours between the hours of 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time (between early April and late October). Implementation of the proposed project would change the pattern of shadow cast by the sun on adjacent properties. Construction of the proposed project would introduce a new base structure to the project site with two residential structures in locations currently occupied by a three-story church, a commercial strip center, and surface parking lot, respectively. Shadow-sensitive uses, including residences, exist in the immediate vicinity of the project site. During summer months, the sun travels in an arc farther north than during other times of the year. As such, shadows cast during the summer do not extend as far onto other adjacent properties as would occur during the winter. The angle of the sun during the winter solstice casts the longest shadows of the year, with peak shadows occurring shortly after sunrise and before sunset. Figure IV.A-5, Shade and Shadow Analysis, shows the shadows cast in the vicinity of the project site. Morning shadow patterns would extend to the west and northwest of the project. The maximum shadow lengths would occur at the winter solstice. On that day, the project would cast shadows of approximately 440 feet. Early morning shadows would fall across properties on the northwest side in both the winter and autumn. Noon shadows would be cast on properties to the north in both the winter and autumn. Afternoon shadows cast by the project would extend to the northeast in the winter and autumn. Overall, the shadows cast onto adjacent properties would not create a significant impact because the shadows cast from the proposed structure would not be cast upon shadow-sensitive uses to the east. Therefore, no potential for significant impacts would occur with respect to shadowing and shading-sensitive uses. Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-18 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

19 n Solstice Jun. 09:00 Solstice Jun. 12:00 Solstice Jun. 15:00 Equinox Mar. 09:00 Equinox Mar. 12:00 Equinox Mar. 15:00 Solstice Dec. 09:00 Solstice Dec. 12:00 Solstice Dec. 15:00 SOURCE: Thomas P. Cox Architects, Inc. - May 2008 FIGURE IV.A-5 Shade and Shadow Analysis /08

20 Nighttime Lighting Impacts related to nighttime lighting are considered significant for the project if The change in ambient illumination levels is significant as a result of project sources. New light sources introduced from the proposed project would include lighting associated with the approximately 1 00-foot-high finger residential structure and the approximately 40-foot-high bar residential structure. The existing nighttime lighting associated with project site would be replaced with lighting from these new structures, which would increase the level of light on the site from current levels, due to the higher intensity nature of the proposed project. The lighting proposed by the proposed project would be limited to the amount required to safely light driveways, sidewalks, and public space areas within the project. In addition, landscape lighting would be utilized to accentuate landscape features. All outdoor lighting would be oriented and focused onto the specific on-site location intended for illumination, such as driveways, walkways, interior courtyard areas, and public areas, and directed away from adjacent properties and public rights-of-way to avoid any light or glare impacts from lighting fixtures included in the project. Given the above, the new lighting established on the site would not result in substantial increases in light or glare that would affect any light-sensitive uses on or near the site. The driveways into the proposed parking garage would also be located and oriented in a manner that would not result in headlights from vehicles entering or exiting these parking areas directly lighting any sensitive uses. No substantial light or glare impacts from vehicles entering and exiting the proposed parking garage would occur as result of the project design. Direct and indirect lighting would also be used for signage to be placed on site and on building façades. Signage lighting would be focused onto sign surfaces and would generally be of low to medium brightness. All proposed signage and associated lighting would be subject to signage regulations included in the Los Angeles Municipal Code. Lighting associated with signs would not, therefore, result in substantial light or glare impacts. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not significantly change ambient illumination levels, and no potential for significant impacts would occur. Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-20 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

21 Impacts related to visual character are considered significant for the proposed project based on The extent to which project lighting would spill off the project site and affect adjacent light-sensitive areas. The use of security lighting during project construction will be limited to only those locations on the construction site requiring illumination. All security lights will be properly shielded and projected downwards during construction such that light is directed onto the project site only. For these reasons, impacts related to nighttime lighting would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. As discussed above, project lighting would include exterior nighttime security lighting and interior lighting associated with the residential, retail, restaurant, and parking uses. Lighting would be directed and aimed at on-site areas of the property, building entry points, driveways, interior courtyards, and sidewalks surrounding the project site. Light-sensitive uses are located immediately adjacent to the east and south of the project site. While security lighting already exists on the project site and the area surrounding is urban in nature, the project may have the potential to generate lighting that could spill off the project site and adversely impact adjacent light-sensitive uses. However, the impact would be reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of mitigation measure MM-VR-1, listed below on page IV.A-24. c. Cumulative Impacts Cumulative impacts could occur if two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. Aesthetic impacts could be compounded if the proposed project, either on its own contributes, or in combination with other projects in the surrounding vicinity, degrades the visual quality and character of the project area. The proposed project, in combination with the list of related projects identified in Section III, General Description of Environmental Setting, does have the potential to alter the visual character of the Wilshire Community Plan Area, especially the Miracle Mile District, although not to a level considered to be significant. This impact is not considered significant because the northern residential structure of the proposed project is respectful of the height and architectural style of the Clem Wilson Tower to the north. In addition, the massing of the northern residential structure also reflects the height of the cornices, setbacks, and terraces that are featured on the Wilson Tower. Similar to the proposed project, the related projects are visually compatible with the planned land uses and densities in the various land use plans governing the development of the Wilshire Community Plan Area, in particular development within the Miracle Mile District. Therefore, no cumulatively considerable visual resource impacts are anticipated through implementation of the proposed project in combination with the identified related projects. Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-21 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

22 Visual Character The visual character of the Wilshire Community Plan Area is urban with a variety of building heights, building types, and densities. The visual character of the Miracle Mile District, which is located directly adjacent to the project site to the west, is also characterized by numerous high-rise office buildings along Wilshire Boulevard. Several of these high-rise tower buildings are visible from the project site. In addition, high-rise tower buildings along the Wilshire Corridor are also visible to the east from higher on-site vantage points. Construction of the proposed project, in combination with the identified related projects, would increase the density of land uses and general height of buildings in the Wilshire Community Plan Area, as several of the projects would be high-rise structures. Without detailed design proposals for each of the related projects, it is difficult to determine exactly how the visual character of the area would be altered. However, increasing the height and density of buildings in the Wilshire Community Plan Area is consistent with the growth and development planned for within the Wilshire Community Plan. All proposed projects would be subject to design review by the City of Los Angeles to assure that each is compliant with all relevant City policies. Thus, no cumulatively considerable impacts to visual character would occur through implementation of the proposed project in combination with related projects. Impacts are considered less than significant. Scenic Vistas The proposed project site and sites corresponding with the identified related projects list are located throughout the Wilshire Community Plan Area of Los Angeles and the Miracle Mile District. The Scenic Highway Plan (adopted in 1978 and incorporated into the Transportation Element of the City of Los Angeles General Plan,) designates Wilshire Boulevard as a Scenic Highway due to its nature as a highly urbanized high-rise corridor. Implementation of the proposed project and related projects would introduce new high-rise and mid-rise buildings in the Wilshire Community Plan Area and Miracle Mile District that would contribute to the expected visual characteristics of the Wilshire Boulevard Corridor skyline. It is unknown how tall each of the structures proposed for the related projects would be and, therefore, difficult to determine exactly how the Los Angeles skyline would be modified. However, given the types of developments proposed for each of the related projects, it is likely that several additional mid- and high-rise structures would be constructed along the Wilshire Boulevard Corridor in the Wilshire Community Plan Area as the related projects are implemented. Each of the related projects would be subject to design review by the City of Los Angeles to assure that the visual character of the skyline is maintained from all distant vantage points, including along the Wilshire Boulevard Corridor. Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-22 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

23 As such, the proposed project in conjunction with the identified related projects would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact on the Wilshire Boulevard Corridor skyline as a scenic vista. Shade and Shadow Implementation of the proposed project in combination with the identified related projects would change the pattern of shadow cast by the sun on the properties throughout the Wilshire Community Plan Area. During summer months, the sun travels in an arc farther north than during other times of the year. As such, shadows cast during the summer do not extend as far onto other adjacent properties as would occur during the winter. The angle of the sun during the winter solstice casts the longest shadows of the year, with peak shadows occurring shortly after sunrise and before sunset. Therefore, throughout each day, shadows would be cast in the vicinity of the proposed and related mid-rise and high-rise projects. Morning shadow patterns would extend to the west and northwest of each project site. The maximum shadow lengths would occur at the winter solstice. Noon shadows would be cast on properties to the northwest in the winter and properties to the west in the autumn. Afternoon shadows cast by each mid-rise and high-rise residential structure would extend to the northeast in the winter and autumn. In the general vicinity of the proposed and related projects, shadows are already cast onto adjacent properties from the neighboring mid-rise and high-rise structures. While construction of the additional proposed mid-rise and high-rise structures would generate additional shadows and shading in the Wilshire Community Plan Area, the additional shadows are not expected to create a significant cumulative impact upon shadow sensitive uses in the plan area because the shadows cast by the new structures would primarily overlap with shadows cast by current structures. As such, a cumulatively considerable impact relating to shade and shadows would not occur. Impacts are considered less than significant. Nighttime Lighting Each of the proposed sites corresponding to the related projects listed in Section III, Environmental Setting, is currently located in a dense urban environment and is a source of nighttime light in the area. Implementation of the proposed project, along with the related projects in the area, would result in higher density and, generally, an increase in the amount of lighting present on each site and in the Wilshire Community Plan Area. New light sources introduced from the proposed project in combination with the identified related projects would include additional nighttime security lighting on each project site, street lighting, and lighting in open spaces between buildings. In addition to the exterior groundlevel nighttime security lighting at each project site, interior lighting associated with the proposed uses would provide an additional source of nighttime illumination from each project site. Each project would Los Angeles Department of City Planning IV.A-23 Wilshire and La Brea Project Draft EIR

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. VIEWS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. VIEWS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. VIEWS ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Existing Visual Character Project Site The project site is located at 10250 Wilshire Boulevard in the Westwood community of

More information

IV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES

IV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES IV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Existing Visual Character Project Site The project site is located at 17331-17333 Tramonto Drive in the Pacific Palisades community of the City of Los Angeles

More information

The impacts examined herein take into account two attributes of aesthetic values:

The impacts examined herein take into account two attributes of aesthetic values: IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS This section addresses the potential impacts to views and aesthetics as a result of the proposed Project at the Project Site and the development scenarios analyzed for

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS This section addresses the potential impacts to aesthetics and views that could result from the proposed project, including development of the Add Area,

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. SHADE/SHADOW

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. SHADE/SHADOW IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. SHADE/SHADOW ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The issue of shade and shadow pertains to the blockage of direct sunlight by onsite buildings, which affect adjacent

More information

13. New Construction. Context & Character

13. New Construction. Context & Character 13. New Construction Context & Character While historic districts convey a sense of time and place which is retained through the preservation of historic buildings and relationships, these areas continue

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS INTRODUCTION This section evaluates the potential impacts of the Proposed Project on aesthetics, views and vistas, light and glare, and shade and shadows

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. AESTHETICS/VIEWS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. AESTHETICS/VIEWS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. AESTHETICS/VIEWS ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Aesthetic impact assessment generally deals with the issue of contrast, or the degree to which elements of the

More information

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23 The following photographs from throughout the country illustrate key urban design principles. Photographs are provided to illustrate the overall urban design concepts described in Chapter 1 of the Downtown

More information

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003 Resolution 03-011: Exhibit A Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Adopted March 2003 1 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. VIEWS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. VIEWS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. VIEWS INTRODUCTION This section evaluates the potential impacts of the Proposed Project on aesthetics, views and vistas, light and glare, and shade and

More information

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center The Town Center Vision is scattered throughout the Comprehensive Plan, development code and the 1994 Town Center Plan. What follows are sections

More information

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 SITE DESIGN Purpose 1 CHAPTER 2 SITE DESIGN Streetscape

More information

Nob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project EIR

Nob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project EIR Section 3.1 Aesthetics This section addresses the visual aspects that may affect the views experienced by the public, including the potential to impact the existing character of each area that comprises

More information

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project DEVELOPER: SIGNATURE PROPERTIES ARCHITECT: HKIT ARCHITECTS April 23, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Vision 4 Description of Site 5 Guiding Concepts 6

More information

3.1 Aesthetics, Light, and Glare

3.1 Aesthetics, Light, and Glare 3.1 3.1.1 Introduction This section describes the existing aesthetics, light, and glare setting and potential effects from project implementation on visual resources and the site and its surroundings.

More information

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity. 6-22 Community Design Street Walls and Street-front Setbacks The siting of buildings will play a critical role in establishing the character and sense of place for the District. Siting buildings at the

More information

Walnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines. Part Three III - 25

Walnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines. Part Three III - 25 C. General Design Criteria Part Three DRAFT 0/6/ III - 5 Frontage Types Frontage is a semi-public transition zone at the ground level where public and private realms meet. An understanding of various frontage

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS 1. INTRODUCTION

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS 1. INTRODUCTION IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 1. INTRODUCTION Aesthetics, views, nighttime illumination, and daytime glare are related elements in the visual environment. Aesthetics generally refers to the identification

More information

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST Section 1.0 General Strategies 1.1 DESIGN EXCELLENCE: ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY AND INNOVATIVE DESIGN OF NEW BUILDINGS WITHIN THE WEST LOOP WITHOUT BEING PRESCRIPTIVE

More information

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion Future Five Design/ Development Guidelines January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion 5-Points Design Guidelines Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Area boundaries 4 III. Review Process

More information

Commercial Development Permit Area

Commercial Development Permit Area City of Kamloops KAMPLAN Commercial Development Permit Area PURPOSE The purpose of this Development Permit Area (DPA) is to establish objectives and provide guidelines for the form and character of commercial

More information

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis A. Aesthetics, Views, Light/Glare, and Shading

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis A. Aesthetics, Views, Light/Glare, and Shading IV. Environmental Impact Analysis A. Aesthetics, Views, Light/Glare, and Shading 1. Introduction This section addresses the potential impacts that could result from the project with regard to aesthetics,

More information

1. Avoid extensive blank walls that would detract from the experience and appearance of an active streetscape.

1. Avoid extensive blank walls that would detract from the experience and appearance of an active streetscape. 08 ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL Once a building s massing and street wall have been defined, architectural details, including façade variation, materials and window treatment, shape a building s visual identity.

More information

WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT. Addendum to the Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report

WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT. Addendum to the Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report PROJECT to the Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report August 2011 Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report SUMMARY On October 28, 2010, the Metro Board selected the Westwood/VA Hospital Extension

More information

4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES

4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES The following sections discuss the impacts associated with environmental resources for the tunneling method Alternatives A and B. The construction

More information

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon 4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre 4.0 Design Guidelines for the Village Centre The Village Centre is the focal point of the entire South Fields Community and is designed as a traditional commercial

More information

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development Adopted June 18, 2009 This section of the Design and focuses on site planning and design guidance for new multi-family

More information

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines 4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines The Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan addresses the area between College Avenue and Steele Lane. Mendocino Avenue is a busy arterial that runs parallel

More information

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines This section provides overall design principles and guidelines for the Gardnerville Mixed-use Overlay. They provide criteria for mixed-use places consisting of residential,

More information

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses CHAPTER 3 Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Section Number Title Ordinance Number Date of Ordinance 16-3-1 Applicability 2006-11 2008-04 07-01-08 16-3-2 Uniform Standards for Architectural Design

More information

Urban Design Brief Fanshawe Park Road. Competition Toyota

Urban Design Brief Fanshawe Park Road. Competition Toyota Urban Design Brief 1300 Fanshawe Park Road Competition Toyota May 2, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 1 SECTION 1 LAND USE PLANNING CONTEXT... 1 1.1 The Subject Lands... 1 1.2 The Proposal...

More information

PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS 20.25 DESIGN REVIEW. 20.25.080 WATERFRONT DISTRICT A. Purpose. This section is intended to implement The Waterfront District Subarea Plan by: 1. Creating a

More information

CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS

CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS 8-2 Land Use 8.0 LAND USE CONTENTS 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.1.1 Uses provided for in all Land Use Designations 8.1.2 Uses prohibited in Hazardous Lands, Hazardous Sites and Special Policy Areas 8.1.3 Uses

More information

TALL BUILDING GUIDELINES

TALL BUILDING GUIDELINES TALL BUILDING GUIDELINES Urban Design Guidance for the Site Planning and Design of Tall Buildings in Milton May, 2018 A Place of Possibility Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 What is a Tall Building? 2

More information

Urban Design Brief to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West

Urban Design Brief to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West Urban Design Brief 1533 to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West Reid s Heritage Homes Ltd. & 883928 Ontario Ltd. and RHH Property Management Ltd. City of Guelph Zoning By-law Amendment November 2017

More information

4.1 AESTHETICS INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY

4.1 AESTHETICS INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. R ECIRCULATED DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 4.1 AESTHETICS 4.1.1 INTRODUCTION This section defines the existing visual setting on and in the vicinity of the project site and analyzes

More information

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018 URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018 DESIGN BRIEF CONTENTS PART A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 DESCRIPTION & ANALYSIS OF SITE CONTEXT 3.0 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES

More information

WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS 20.25.080 WATERFRONT DISTRICT A. Purpose. This section is intended to implement The Waterfront District Subarea Plan by: 1. Creating a safe, vibrant mixed-use urban

More information

CHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES CHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES Section 1300.00 Section 1300.01 Design Guidelines Purpose The purposes of this section are to: A. The purpose of this Section is to establish procedures and standards to serve

More information

New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario

New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario URBAN DESIGN BRIEF New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Creating Vibrant and Sustainable Urban Places: Excerpts from

More information

Bel-Air Lexus Automobile Service Station

Bel-Air Lexus Automobile Service Station Bel-Air Lexus Automobile Service Station Design Brief 443-447 McArthur Avenue Ottawa April 30, 2015 14-1299-MCA Site Details Application: Site Plan Control Legal Description and Municipal Addresses: 443

More information

Urban Design Brief December 23, 2015 Southside Construction Group Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment

Urban Design Brief December 23, 2015 Southside Construction Group Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment Urban Design Brief Proposed Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment 3244, 3263 and 3274 Wonderland Road South Southside Group December 23, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 1 SECTION 1 LAND

More information

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines 5. Community Core Guidelines Development of the Community Core will take place by plan of subdivision and site plan approval. It will occur in a phased manner that will reflect the timing of residential

More information

3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW

3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW Urban Design 3.0 URBAN DESIGN December 6, 2007 3.1 OVERVIEW The highly urban character of Easton Place is defined by the overall design of the community. The following sections provide an overview of the

More information

Othello Neighborhood Design Guidelines

Othello Neighborhood Design Guidelines Othello Neighborhood Design Guidelines 1 S ORCAS ST S OTHELLO ST 42ND AVE S 2 Note: Design Review does not apply to all zones. See Citywide Guidelines for details. Additionally, zoning areas on this map

More information

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4 . General Purpose (DC) Direct Development Control Provision DC Area 4 The purpose of this Provision is to provide for an area of commercial office employment and residential development in support of the

More information

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN 4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN CASTLE ROCK DESIGN 54 4. INDUSTRIAL Overview Well-designed and attractive industrial centers are the product of blending economic realities with both functional and

More information

Chapter 2, Section C: Urban Design and Visual Resources A. INTRODUCTION

Chapter 2, Section C: Urban Design and Visual Resources A. INTRODUCTION Chapter 2, Section C: Urban Design and Visual Resources A. INTRODUCTION This attachment considers the potential of the proposed East River Waterfront Access Project at Peck Slip to effect urban design

More information

Multi family Residential Development Permit Area

Multi family Residential Development Permit Area City of Kamloops KAMPLAN Multi family Residential Development Permit Area PURPOSE The purpose of this Development Permit Area (DPA) is to establish objectives and provide guidelines for the form and character

More information

IV.A AESTHETICS INTRODUCTION

IV.A AESTHETICS INTRODUCTION IV.A AESTHETICS INTRODUCTION This section addresses the potential impacts to visual character, views and vistas, scenic resources, light and glare, and shadows that could result from the implementation

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS IV.A Aesthetics IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS This section addresses the potential impacts to aesthetics and views that could result from the proposed project. The analysis of aesthetics

More information

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Castle Rock is made up of numerous individually built houses and subdivision tracts that have been developed during the past century. Some of the tracts are diverse in architectural

More information

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted by Council, 2006 WINDSOR GLEN REDEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES August 2006 1.0 Master Plan Organization For this area of the Coquitlam Town Centre, a mix of high,

More information

Urban Design Guidelines Townhouse and Apartment Built Form

Urban Design Guidelines Townhouse and Apartment Built Form Urban Design Guidelines Townhouse and Apartment Built Form Town of Wasaga Beach Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Purpose 1.2. Urban Design Principles 1.3. Application of Guidelines 2. Site Design,

More information

Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s

Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s Downtown Ann Arbor Design Guidelines Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s This chapter presents general design guidelines for new site plan or PUD projects in downtown Ann Arbor. The

More information

Clairtrell Area Context Plan

Clairtrell Area Context Plan Clairtrell Area Context Plan March 2005 Urban Development Services City Planning Contents 1. Introduction... 4 2. Development Structure... 6 2.1 Streets... 7 2.1.1 Sheppard Avenue and Bayview Avenue...

More information

4.1 Aesthetics Setting. a. Visual Character

4.1 Aesthetics Setting. a. Visual Character Environmental Impact Analysis Aesthetics 4.1 Aesthetics This section analyzes the proposed Specific Plan s impacts related to aesthetics, including the existing visual character of and scenic views in

More information

DOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

DOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES May 18, 2010 Introduction DOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES The Downtown Transcona Urban Design Guidelines ("the Guidelines") establish criteria for

More information

The transportation system in a community is an

The transportation system in a community is an 7 TRANSPORTATION The transportation system in a community is an important factor contributing to the quality of life of the residents. Without a sound transportation system to bring both goods and patrons

More information

Yonge Eglinton Centre Urban Design Guidelines

Yonge Eglinton Centre Urban Design Guidelines Yonge Eglinton Centre Urban Design Guidelines City Planning Urban Design January 2009 YONGE EGLINTON CENTRE INTRODUCTION.................................................... 1 GENERAL SITE PLAN OBJECTIVES......................................

More information

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2 Plan Guidelines 3 Future Urban Form 4 The West-End 4 Main Street 6 The East-End 7 Figure 2 9 Public Improvement Recommendations 7 General

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS AND VIEWS 1. INTRODUCTION This section analyzes the potential impacts that could result from the proposed project with

More information

Design Guidelines. Roosevelt. Mike Podowski DPD Design Guidelines Ordinance ATT 13 August 13, 2012 Version #1

Design Guidelines. Roosevelt. Mike Podowski DPD Design Guidelines Ordinance ATT 13 August 13, 2012 Version #1 Roosevelt Design Guidelines The Roosevelt Neighborhood Design Guidelines apply within the Neighborhood Boundary. Map 1 2 Map 2 3 Map 3 4 CS1 Natural Systems and Site Features Citywide Guideline: Use natural

More information

Regency Developments. Urban Design Brief. Holyrood DC2 Rezoning

Regency Developments. Urban Design Brief. Holyrood DC2 Rezoning Regency Developments Urban Design Brief Holyrood DC2 Rezoning Stantec Consulting Ltd. 7-31-2017 1. Overview Regency Developments intends to rezone the lands located at 8510 and 8511 93 Avenue, within the

More information

City of Redlands Architectural Guidelines for Non-Residential Development

City of Redlands Architectural Guidelines for Non-Residential Development 14. Building articulation shall be included in the design of building, in order to create a formal entry statement. Avoid this Do this Page 11 15. Give special attention to creating pedestrian scale and

More information

Visual and Aesthetic Resources

Visual and Aesthetic Resources Visual and Aesthetic Resources 7.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter evaluates the effects of the Modified Design on visual and aesthetic resources, in comparison to the effects of 2004 FEIS Design. The 2004 FEIS

More information

Urban Design Brief Woodland Cemetery Funeral Home 493 Springbank Drive

Urban Design Brief Woodland Cemetery Funeral Home 493 Springbank Drive Urban Design Brief Woodland Cemetery Funeral Home The Incorporated Synod of the Diocese of Huron April 15, 2016 Urban Design Brief April 15, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 1 SECTION 1

More information

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines Highland Village Green Design Guidelines Publishing Information Title Highland Village Green Design Guidelins Author The City of Calgary Status DRAFT - Proposed document subject to changes Additional Copies

More information

Residential Design Guidelines

Residential Design Guidelines Residential Design Guidelines Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines Introduction These guidelines seek to provide property owners, designers and developers with a clear understanding of the City

More information

4.1 AESTHETICS. A. Regulatory Framework

4.1 AESTHETICS. A. Regulatory Framework 4.1 This section includes a description of the existing visual setting of the project site and an analysis of the effects the proposed project would have on aesthetics in the project vicinity. Aesthetics

More information

ILLUSTRATIVE DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR OFFICE DEVELOPMENT

ILLUSTRATIVE DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR OFFICE DEVELOPMENT The purpose of this guide is to provide a helpful illustration of the objectives and action strategies contained in the Comprehensive Plan concerning the promotion of high-quality office buildings within

More information

ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES ......... ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES LAGUNA RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN... June 2008 ............ DESIGN GUIDELINES Table of Contents Contents Section A: Town Center Overview...1 A.1. Purpose and

More information

Urban Design Brief. 875 Wellington Road. Proposed One-Storey Fast Food Restaurant and Two-Storey Restaurant. Wellington Harlech Centre Inc.

Urban Design Brief. 875 Wellington Road. Proposed One-Storey Fast Food Restaurant and Two-Storey Restaurant. Wellington Harlech Centre Inc. Urban Design Brief 875 Wellington Road Proposed One-Storey Fast Food Restaurant and Two-Storey Restaurant Wellington Harlech Centre Inc. Prepared By: (519) 433-7587 info@yorkdev.ca May 3 rd 2013 1 Table

More information

Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials

Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property incompatible fencing materials garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park Lack of plantings as a buffer between private property and open

More information

Chapter 5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District

Chapter 5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District 5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District 5.1 Introduction The Mixed Use Neighborhood character district acts as a transition or bridge between the State Route 89A District s commercial area to the

More information

SCHEDULE 12 TO THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY GLEN WAVERLEY ACTIVITY CENTRE STRUCTURE PLAN

SCHEDULE 12 TO THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY GLEN WAVERLEY ACTIVITY CENTRE STRUCTURE PLAN DD/MM/YY Proposed C120 SCHEDULE 12 TO THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY Shown on the planning scheme map as DDO12. GLEN WAVERLEY ACTIVITY CENTRE STRUCTURE PLAN 1.0 Design objectives DD/MM/YY Proposed

More information

Town Center Design Guidelines

Town Center Design Guidelines Adopted by City Council on September 18, 2018 Design Theme The Draper Town Center Design Theme is defined as encompassing those architectural design styles that were prevalent in the construction of civic

More information

Community Design Plan

Community Design Plan Gardena General Plan 2006 Authority While the is not a required element of a General Plan, it is included because improving the community appearance and image is paramount to the overall quality of life

More information

1. INTRODUCTION. a. Light. b. Glare

1. INTRODUCTION. a. Light. b. Glare IV.A.2 LIGHT & GLARE 1. INTRODUCTION This section describes the existing sources of nighttime illumination and glare on the Project site and in the surrounding area and evaluates potential changes resulting

More information

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE March, 2014 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FREEWAY/TOURIST DESIGN STANDARDS March, 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...1 Design Site Design

More information

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road Town of Oakville Prepared By: METROPOLITAN CONSULTING INC For 2500674 Ontario Inc November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 Introduction/Description of Subject

More information

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 2 March 9, 2011 Project: Description: Applicant: DSR11-004 The applicant is requesting approval to replace the existing exterior wood framed

More information

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued. N MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C- FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER 04-00 Project No. 496 Issued Revised SCALE: " = 0' N 0 0 0 40 RZ. c GENERAL PROVISIONS: a. SITE LOCATION.

More information

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.0 LOCATION... 2 3.0 EXISTING CONTEXT... 2 4.0 VISION & GUIDING PRINCIPLES... 2 5.0 LAND USE AND BUILT FORM... 4 5.1 St. Laurent

More information

Urban Design Brief 1576 Richmond Street City of London

Urban Design Brief 1576 Richmond Street City of London Urban Design Brief City of London Treadstone Developments October 31, 2014 Urban Design Brief October 31, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 1 SECTION 1 LAND USE PLANNING CONCEPT... 1 1.1

More information

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW For submission with development proposals in the City s Tourist Area

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW For submission with development proposals in the City s Tourist Area ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW For submission with development proposals in the City s Tourist Area Property Owner: Property Address: Architect: Application Number: Date: Please describe in detail how the

More information

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN The Village SPECIFIC PLAN Chapter 3 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3.1.1 Purpose This Chapter describes the development regulations applicable to the Mixed-Use and Transit Center Planning Areas. These form-based regulations

More information

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 25, Project No. 1507

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 25, Project No. 1507 URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 1131 Gordon Street City of Guelph Prepared on behalf of 1876698 Ontario Inc. March 25, 2016 Project No. 1507 423 Woolwich Street, Suite 201, Guelph, Ontario, N1H 3X3 Phone (519) 836-7526

More information

INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES

INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES INTRODUCTION Community institutions are an important part of the character and vitality of neighborhoods in Forsyth County. Institutional uses include

More information

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Town Center Land Use Element: V. LAND USE POLICIES Town Center Mercer Island's business district vision as described in "Your Mercer Island Citizen-Designed Downtown" was an

More information

5.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES Physical Setting

5.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES Physical Setting 5.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES 5.1.1 Physical Setting Aesthetic values are an important aspect in establishing the identity, sense of place, and quality of life in a community. Natural features in

More information

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to: AUGUST 29, 2017 12.15 Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 12.15.1 Goals 12.15.2 Land Use The goals of this Plan are to: 12.15.2.1 General Provisions: a) Ensure the development of a compact

More information

Harvard-Westlake Parking Improvement Plan, Lighting Evaluation, Lighting Design Alliance, September 25, 2013 (Appendix I)

Harvard-Westlake Parking Improvement Plan, Lighting Evaluation, Lighting Design Alliance, September 25, 2013 (Appendix I) 3.1 AESTHETICS The purpose of this section is to characterize the visual (aesthetic) environment that currently exists in the Project area and to identify potential impacts to: visual character, views

More information

Form & Character Development Permit Areas

Form & Character Development Permit Areas Form & Character 1.1. Overview 1.1.1. AREAS Lands designated as Downtown Smithers, Multi-family Residential, and Highway 16 Commercial and identified on Schedule: C. 1.1.2. PURPOSE The Form and Character

More information

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS Prepared by Planning Staff 10/28/2013 APPLICABLE GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS FROM the LAND USE CHAPTER Goal LU-1 Policy LU-1.1 Policy LU-1.2 Goal LU-2 Protect the character

More information

I. VISUAL/AESTHETICS/NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER. b. Existing Conditions Views from Kimball Avenue

I. VISUAL/AESTHETICS/NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER. b. Existing Conditions Views from Kimball Avenue I. VISUAL/AESTHETICS/NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER 1. Existing Conditions a. View Of The Site From Area Roads Figures IV.I-2, I-3 and I-4 depict existing views from the Cross County Parkway, Central Park Avenue,

More information

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers Metro Activity Center Design Guidelines Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers Metro Activity Centers What is a MAC? Legacy, the adopted guide for the future growth

More information

CHAPTER 12 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

CHAPTER 12 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CHAPTER 12 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Introduction This chapter provides design guidelines for public sector improvements in the downtown. This includes streetscape design, as well as the

More information

PROJECT SITE The Proposed Project includes the Allen and Pike Street malls between Delancey and South Streets (see Figure 2C-1).

PROJECT SITE The Proposed Project includes the Allen and Pike Street malls between Delancey and South Streets (see Figure 2C-1). Chapter 2, Section C: A. INTRODUCTION This chapter considers the potential of the proposed Reconstruction of the Allen and Pike Street Malls project to affect the urban design characteristics and visual

More information