Galiuro Drilling EA Scenery Debby Kriegel 12/9/16
|
|
- Maurice Alexander
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Galiuro Drilling EA Scenery Debby Kriegel 12/9/16 INTRODUCTION The 1.7 million acre Coronado National Forest (CNF) is comprised of 12 sky island mountain ranges. CNF visitors have opportunities to sightsee along forest roads, camp in developed and back-country camping areas, hike, rock climb, mountain bike, and enjoy extraordinarily high quality scenery in predominantly undeveloped landscapes. The results of a the 2012 National Visitor Use Monitoring survey show that 60 percent of visitors to the CNF participate in viewing natural features (scenery) and that this activity was the second most popular primary activity after hiking and walking. The scenic landscapes of the Safford Ranger District are important to local residents and forest visitors, and the proposed Galiuro Drilling project would impact scenic quality. This report provides a brief overview of scenic resources in the project area, the impacts of the proposed project, and recommended mitigation measures. The Visual Resource Management System and Scenery Management System In recent years, there has been conflicting direction regarding the assessment of scenic resources on the CNF. The Coronado National Forest Plan (CNF, 1986) refers to Visual Quality Objectives (VQO) maps created under the 1974 Visual Resource Management System (VRMS), yet since the mid-1990s National Forests have been directed to use the improved Scenery Management System (SMS). In 2001, SMS mapping of Scenic Classes, which show the relative importance of scenic resources on the CNF, was completed. As soon as the forest began using SMS in environmental analyses, some problems became apparent because the new system is different than what is in the forest plan. This will be resolved when SMS is incorporated into the revised forest plan. In 2012, the CNF established draft recommended Scenic Integrity Objectives (SIOs), which will replace VQOs, and these have been made available for public review along with the revised plan and draft environmental impact statement. Although on-the-ground maps for the two systems are very different, the components of both systems are similar and the analysis (affected environment, environmental consequences, and cumulative effects) for the proposed project yields largely the same results. To be consistent with the current Forest Plan, this report provides an analysis of the proposed project using the VRMS and VQOs. However, direction from the draft revised Forest Plan (and SMS) is also briefly covered where it provides supplemental information. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT Characteristic Landscape The landscape character in the proposed project area is a mosaic of mostly oak/juniper/pinyon, with smaller areas of pine-oak, desert shrub mix, chaparral, and grass mix on steep slopes (over
2 30%). Due to the remoteness of the area, there are few modifications to the valued landscape character. Existing scenic integrity is excellent. The Coronado National Forest Plan Direction for managing scenery on the CNF is found in the Forest Plan. Current direction in the Forest Plan includes the following Forest-wide Standards and Guidelines for Visual Resource Management (page 28): Maintain and protect the visual integrity of the landscape. Rehabilitate or enhance the existing visual quality in the process of accomplishing other resource management practices. Eleven of the proposed drilling sites lie within Management Area (MA) 1. One is located in MA 4. Scenic quality standards and guidelines for MA 1 require that "Visual quality objectives will be met" (see Management Emphasis and Intensity on page 47). Scenic quality standards and guidelines for MA 4 require that Visual quality objectives will be met or exceeded (see Management Emphasis and Intensity on page 62). VQOs for every acre of the CNF were established in the early 1980s and incorporated into the Forest Plan. VQOs are based on two components: 1. Variety Class: A measure of the visual variety or diversity of landscape character. The three variety classes are A (Distinctive), B (Common), and C (Minimal). 2. Sensitivity Levels (Concern Levels in SMS) and Distance Zones: Sensitivity Levels are a measure of the viewer interest in scenic qualities of a landscape. The three levels are 1 (Highest), 2 (Average), and 3 (Lowest). Distance Zones include Foreground (up to 1/2 mile), Middleground (1/2 mile to 5 miles), and Background (over 5 miles). Seven of the proposed drill sites are located in Variety Class B, and five are located in Variety Class A. There are no maps of Sensitivity Levels for the project area. SMS mapping provides information about visually sensitive travelways in the area. In SMS, two trails within the Galiuro Wilderness (#271 and 289) have been designated Concern Level 1 (High Interest in Scenery). The closest of these is 2.7 miles away from the proposed project. The north end of trail #289 is mostly outside of Wilderness and passes near the project area, but has not been identified as a sensitive travelway because of the lack of public access and corresponding low trail use. Forest Road 8129 is a Concern Level 2 (Moderate Interest in Scenery), but is located 2.4 miles from the project area, but travelers on this road are unlikely to see the project due to distance and topography. Eight of the proposed drilling sites are located in VQO Partial Retention. Four are located in VQO Modification. Definitions for VQOs are: Partial Retention: Management activities must be visually subordinate to the characteristic landscape.
3 Modification: Management activities may dominate the characteristic landscape, but must, at the same time, utilize naturally established form, line, color, and texture. In the draft revised Forest Plan, the project area is located in an area with an SIO of High (which requires that human activities to not be visually evident). The revised plan also includes a guideline that allows for mineral exploration to not meet SIOs in the short term, but activities must meet SIOs at project completion. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES Methodology This analysis was completed using the framework outlined in Forest Service Handbooks and GIS data. The proposed project would affect scenic resources. Activities that contrast with the valued landscape lower scenic integrity, and mineral exploration activities would introduce noticeable deviations to the characteristic form, line, color, and texture of a landscape. No Action Under the No Action alternative, mineral exploration activities would not occur. No drilling would occur. Scenery would remain as it presently exists. Proposed Action The project would include 12 drilling sites Disturbance footprints at each site include a 50 ft. x 50 ft. drill pad, a 30 ft. x 30 ft. helicopter landing zone, and a foot trail (<350 feet long) between the two. A total of 1.2 acres would be disturbed. Each site would drill rigs and other facilities (including storage buildings and tanks, trash containers, and port-a-potties) as well as materials and processing areas. Drilling activities at each site would be completed within 2-3 months and reclamation would follow. The entire project may take 5 years to complete. No more than two sites would be drilled at one time. No roads would be constructed. Visual impacts from the activities would occur from clearing vegetation and from industriallooking facilities in an otherwise natural landscape. The tallest items at the drilling sites would be approx. 30 feet high. Topography and vegetation throughout the area varies, but is not expected to screen activities from sensitive travelways. Some drilling sites would likely be visible from hiking trails in the Galiuro Wilderness due to their locations in elevated and/or exposed areas with little vegetative screening, but because of distance (2 miles to the Wilderness boundary and 2.7 miles or more to sensitive trails) this impact is minor. Other drilling sites would be tucked into valleys where they are less visible from afar and/or partially screened by denser vegetation.
4 Drilling sites would contrast with the natural landscape and therefore negatively impact scenery, but reclamation of the site impacts is expected to meet the long term VQOs. Overland footpaths are not expected to require vegetation removal and would have no long-term effects. Water pipelines (and water storage tanks and pumps as needed) are not expected to impact scenery; no clearing is planned and these materials would be laid on the ground along access roads and removed when no longer needed for drilling activities. Although the VMS does not specifically require analysis of night-time project effects, drilling activities would operate 24 hours a day and the proposed project would include night time lighting at each site, which would alter the scenery and dark night-time setting in the areas. Additionally, helicopter landings during the winter months would require lights. However, because of distance from visually sensitive areas (2.7 miles or more), this impact is minor. Planned reclamation is described in the Galiuro Drilling Project Plan of Operations (February 26, 2016) and includes grading to pre-disturbance topography, topsoil placement, seeding, and placement of slash within 30 days of each drill hole completion. Additionally, the Plan of Operations mentions that dust will be kept to a minimum and proper housekeeping will be observed at all times. These measures would help reduce impacts to scenery. See recommended mitigation measures are described below. With mitigation, the proposed project is expected to meet VQOs (as well as long-term SIOs). CUMULATIVE EFFECTS Cumulative effects are defined as the incremental impact of an action, when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions. The cumulative effects boundary for cumulative effects to scenery is the Gailuro EMA during the 5 year proposed project. Several projects on other portions of the Safford Ranger District, including proposed improvements at Fry Mesa and Treasure Park Campground, allotment analyses (Seventy Six, Two Troughs, Cedar Springs, and Veech), and Pinaleno Firescape) are outside of this boundary and therefore would not result in cumulative effects. Reasonably foreseeable future actions in the project area that affect scenic resources include: Galiuro Firescape, which would provide long-term benefits to scenery by improving forest health and reducing risks of catastrophic wildfire. Forest Plan revision, which would improve the management of scenery on the CNF by implementing the SMS and providing improved direction for managing scenery (including guidance for future mineral exploration). Travel Management (changes to the Safford Ranger District motorized travel system), which would benefit scenic resources by properly maintaining system roads and decommissioning unnecessary roads. Fuelwood collection, which would have no long-term effects on scenery. Because there are no past or present actions that impact scenery, and most future actions would provide benefits, no cumulative effects from this project are expected.
5 RECOMMENDED MITIGATION In order to meet project area VQOs, the following mitigation measures are recommended: 1. Design drilling pad facilities to minimize surface disturbance and fit into existing clearings wherever possible. Minimize vegetation removal (especially large shrubs and trees). 2. Keep drilling sites clean and in good condition (contain litter and debris, ensure that stormwater does not erode soils, etc.). 3. Check water lines as needed to ensure that leaks do not disturb existing soils. 4. Naturalize drilling sites, helicopter landing zones, and footpaths by removing all facilities and debris, backfilling holes and restoring natural grades and drainage patterns, tilling compacted areas, stabilizing soils if necessary, and seeding with native species found in the immediate area. If available, place topsoil and slash/branches on disturbed areas. 5. Monitor reclamation. If naturalization is not successful, repeat actions as needed. REFERENCES Coronado National Forest Plan, USDA Forest Service, Landscape Aesthetics, A Handbook for Scenery Management, USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook No. 701, National Forest Landscape Management, Volume 2, Chapter 1, The Visual Management System, USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook No. 462,
The analysis area for the scenic resource is the project area described in Chapter 1. Affected Environment/Existing Condition
Chapter 3 - Scenic Resource SCENIC RESOURCES Introduction The Spotted Bear Ranger District is a destination point for outdoor recreation activities and offers a variety of recreation opportunities: driving
More informationScenic Resources Revised 7/19/2011
1 Scenic Resources Revised 7/19/2011 Affected Environment The existing characteristic landscape of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands includes high mesas, dissected plateaus, deep canyons, volcanic
More informationCheyenne River Range Area Management Plan. Buffalo Gap National Grassland Wall Ranger District. Scenery Resource Specialist Report
Cheyenne River Range Area Management Plan Buffalo Gap National Grassland Wall Ranger District Scenery Resource Specialist Report Prepared by: /s/ Stephen P. Keegan Stephen Keegan, June 1, 2016 Forest Landscape
More informationLong Distance Landscapes
Long Distance Landscapes CONDUCTING A BASELINE VISUAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL Presented by: Brad Cownover and Matt Ramich Landscape Architects, US Forest Service OVERVIEW:
More informationSherman Pass Project Post-Fire Treatment Scenery Report Barbara Jackson, Landscape Architect, 3/30/2016
Sherman Pass Project Post-Fire Treatment Scenery Report Barbara Jackson, Landscape Architect, 3/30/2016 Introduction This report updates the 2015 Sherman Pass Project Scenery Report based on changes in
More informationAppendix C Visual Analysis Information
Appendix C Visual Analysis Information C-1 Table C-1. Summary of Visual Resource Contrast Rating Analysis at Key Observation Points. VIEWPOINT DESCRIPTION EXISTING VISUAL SETTING VISUAL CHANGE 1 IMPACT
More informationVerde Valley Landscape Character Type
Existing Condition Landscape Character The existing landscape character describes the existing set of valued aesthetic attributes for the current landscape. The landscape character descriptions include
More informationMANAGEMENT. Table 7. Forest Scenery Goal and Objectives: Takatz Lake Hydroelectric Project
Management MANAGEMENT The second phase of Scenic Management Systems is establishing the management requirements including the development of scenery goals and objectives. This phase references the established
More informationTower Fire Salvage and Reforestation Project
Tower Fire Salvage and Reforestation Project Scenery Report Prepared by: Morai Helfen Forest Landscape Architect for: Priest Lake Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forests Date March 26, 2016 In
More informationPreservation of Scenery National Historic Trails. Rob Sweeten BLM Kevin Rauhe EPG
Preservation of Scenery National Historic Trails Rob Sweeten BLM Kevin Rauhe EPG EPG Background Landscape architects with expertise in visual resources Resource staff includes: archaeologists, biologists,
More informationReviewing Officer, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Greg Warren, 22 S Juniper Ct, Golden, CO ; phone is not available
To: Attn: Reviewing Officer, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region Objection Reviewing Officer Planning Department 740 Simms, Golden, CO 80401 Email to: r02admin_review@fs.fed.us Subject: From: SBEADMR
More informationAPPENDIX V FRAMEWORK VISUAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN
APPENDIX V FRAMEWORK VISUAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS V1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 V1.1 PLAN PURPOSE... 1 V1.2 PLAN UPDATES... 1 V1.3 AGENCY-SPECIFIC LAWS, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS... 1 V1.3.1
More informationZoning Ordinance Chapter 10
CHAPTER 10 - WASHES SECTION 10.0 GENERAL: A. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish standards for development in or near Major and Minor Washes as defined in Appendix A Glossary of Terms and Definitions
More informationVISUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE TRI-STATE MONTROSE-NUCLA-CAHONE TRANSMISSION LINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SOUTHWEST COLORADO
FOR THE TRI-STATE MONTROSE-NUCLA-CAHONE TRANSMISSION LINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SOUTHWEST COLORADO Prepared for Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. 1100 West 116 th Avenue Westminster,
More informationAppendix 17A Scenic Quality Rating Forms
1 2 Appendix 17A Scenic Quality Rating Forms UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT SCENIC QUALITY RATING SUMMARY Date: March 7, 2018 Landscape Character Unit: N/A Key Observation
More informationVISUAL RESOURCES PLAN
VISUAL RESOURCES PLAN BIG CREEK HYDROELECTRIC SYSTEM MAMMOTH POOL PROJECT (FERC PROJECT NO. 2085) BIG CREEK NOS. 1 AND 2 (FERC PROJECT NO. 2175) BIG CREEK NOS. 2A, 8, AND EASTWOOD (FERC PROJECT NO. 67)
More informationNob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project EIR
Section 3.1 Aesthetics This section addresses the visual aspects that may affect the views experienced by the public, including the potential to impact the existing character of each area that comprises
More informationWorking Group Meeting
April 4,, 2017 Parks Operations Bldg Working Group Meeting Arts Districts Overview Stormwater/RPA/Stream Considerations First Principles Agenda 7:00pm 7:05pm 7:10pm 7:40pm 8:30pm 9:40pm 9:45pm Welcome
More informationSCC PRD (2016) COUNTY PARK MASTER PLAN
SCC PRD (2016) COUNTY PARK MASTER PLAN MASTER PLAN UPDATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION NOVEMBER 7, 2018 PURPOSE OF THE MASTER PLAN The Sanborn County Park Master Plan will provide the Department with
More informationPlan Review Checklist
Plan Review Checklist FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS _ Minimum Standards - All applicable Minimum Standards must be addressed. All minimum Standards must be adhered to during the entire project
More informationObjection to the Draft ROD, FEIS, and Revised LMP Inyo National Forest (83 FR 38118)
Reviewing Officer Barnie Gyant Deputy Regional Forester, USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region 1323 Club Drive, Vallejo, CA 94592 objections-pacificsouthwest-regional-office@fs.fed.us October 2,
More information6.3 VISUAL RESOURCES. Landscape Character
6.3 VISUAL RESOURCES 6.3.1 Affected Environment The DMR discussion is divided into two areas, DMR and Dillingham Trail, which would extend from SBMR to DMR. The ROI includes all areas within the line of
More informationArticle 6 Tree Protection
Article 6 Tree Protection 8.1 Purpose 8.2 Applicability 8.2.1 General Provisions 8.2.2 Exemptions 8.3 Permitting Procedure 8.4 Planting Procedure 8.5 Performance Guarantee Required for Belated Planting
More informationCanyon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 18, 2016
Canyon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 18, 2016 Marcus Schimank Canyon Lake Manager Capital Regional Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District US Army Corps of
More informationJoe Pool Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 23, 2017
Joe Pool Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 23, 2017 Presented By Jason Owen Lake Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District US Army Corps of Engineers Purpose of this
More informationPreliminary Management Recommendations for the proposed Sedona Verde Valley Red Rock National Monument
Preliminary Management Recommendations for the proposed Sedona Verde Valley Red Rock National Monument The Monument shall be managed consistent with the values that underlie the designation as a National
More informationProject Analysis and Evaluation. UNIT 10 Project Analysis and Evaluation
Project Analysis and Evaluation UNIT 10 Project Analysis and Evaluation 1 Objective Provide accurate and complete information to the decision maker. 2 Initial Project Considerations What is your role?
More informationVisual Impact Rating Form - Instructions
Visual Impact Rating Form Instructions Project Name: Baron Winds Project EDR Project No: 13039 Date: 05.16.17 Reference: Visual Impact Rating Form - Instructions These instructions are intended to guide
More information6.8 SCENIC HIGHWAYS Introduction
6.8 SCENIC HIGHWAYS 6.8.1 Introduction The Scenic Highways Element is an optional General Plan element authorized by Section 65303 of the Government Code. The Scenic Highways Element is intended to establish
More informationButte Mtn. Late Successional Reserve Habitat Restoration Project Soil Report
KLAMATH NATIONAL FOREST Butte Mtn. Late Successional Reserve Habitat Restoration Project Soil Report GOOSENEST RANGER DISTRICT JOE BLANCHARD 4/23/2013 Prepared by Joe Blanchard Forest Soil Scientist Klamath
More informationLower Joseph Creek Restoration Project Scenery Resources
Lower Joseph Creek Restoration Project Scenery Resources Prepared by 1 : Ayn Shlisky, and Barb Wales, Blue Mountains Restoration Strategy September 23, 2014 Introduction Scenic quality is an important
More informationZoning Ordinance Article 3
Article 3 Natural Resources Protection Section 301 Natural Resources Protection 301.1. Purpose - The following natural resources protection standards are established to protect the public health, safety
More information2.0 REGULATORY CONTEXT
2.0 REGULATORY CONTEXT 2.1 CEAA and BC Parks Cooperation This Environmental Assessment Report (EAR) reflects the Terms of Reference for a Screening Report under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
More information2.1.4 Roof Downspout Rain Gardens
2008 SWMM, 2010 Revision City of Tacoma 2.1.4 Roof Downspout Rain Gardens Purpose and Definition Bioretention areas are shallow stormwater retention facilities designed to mimic forested systems by controlling
More informationDraft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual
Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual Summary The May 2009 Public Review Draft version of the RI Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual consists of approximately
More information5.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES Physical Setting
5.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES 5.1.1 Physical Setting Aesthetic values are an important aspect in establishing the identity, sense of place, and quality of life in a community. Natural features in
More informationRAIN GARDEN ILLINOIS URBAN MANUAL PRACTICE STANDARD. (feet) CODE 897 DEFINITION
ILLINOIS URBAN MANUAL PRACTICE STANDARD RAIN GARDEN (feet) CODE 897 Source: Kendall County Soil and Water Conservation District DEFINITION Rain gardens are small, shallow, flat bottomed depressions constructed
More information2011 ASLA Design Awards
2011 ASLA Design Awards Interstate 70 Mountain Corridor Aesthetic Guidance Honor Award Design Workshop, Aspen / THK Associates, Inc. / CH2MHill Planning and Urban Design Project Title: Interstate70 Mountain
More information3.7 Aesthetics. A. Setting. 1. Existing Views of the Quarry
3.7 Aesthetics A. Setting 1. Existing Views of the Quarry The existing quarry is visible from Highway 101 and from locations on the Ridgewood Ranch to the south. It is also possibly visible from distant
More informationThe impacts examined herein take into account two attributes of aesthetic values:
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS This section addresses the potential impacts to views and aesthetics as a result of the proposed Project at the Project Site and the development scenarios analyzed for
More informationUwharrie National Forest Aesthetic Study
Alcoa Power Generating Inc. Yadkin Division Yadkin Project Relicensing (FERC No. 2197) Uwharrie National Forest Aesthetic Study Draft Report Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...ES-i 1.0 INTRODUCTION...1
More informationPresented at USSD Conference April 20-24, 2009, Nashville, TN HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT USING THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE AS A VISUAL BARRIER ABSTRACT
HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT USING THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE AS A VISUAL BARRIER 1 Andrew Aceves, P.G., Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. 2 Melissa L. Dubinsky, Ph.D, Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. 3 Craig Giesmann,
More informationPLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST
Page 1 of 8 PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS Please fill in all blanks and reference the plan sheets/pages where the information may be found, where appropriate, or write
More informationMeeting Agenda. City of Guelph. River Systems Advisory Committee. Agenda Items. Item 1, 2 and 3. Item 4 Ward to Downtown Pedestrian Bridge
Meeting Agenda City of Guelph River Systems Advisory Committee September 19, 2018 City Hall, Meeting Room B From 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. Meeting Chair: Mariette Pushkar Agenda Items Welcome to all Item 1, 2
More informationFinger Lakes National Forest. Backbone Horse Camp Water Hydrant Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service February 2014 Backbone Horse Camp Water Hydrant Project Scoping Information Hector Ranger District Town of Lodi, Seneca County, New York For Information
More informationAlberta policy and regulations for grassland reclamation criteria, evolution of the criteria from the 1995 version to today
Alberta policy and regulations for grassland reclamation criteria, evolution of the criteria from the 1995 version to today Jody Spady on behalf of Reclamation Criteria Advisory Group (RCAG) Native Prairie
More informationCHAPTER 15 AESTHETICS. Setting. Introduction. Impacts and Mitigation Measures of the 2015 Plan Alternatives
CHAPTER 15 AESTHETICS Introduction Setting Impacts and Mitigation Measures of the 2015 Plan Alternatives CHAPTER 15 AESTHETICS INTRODUCTION Public acceptance of a project may be strongly influenced by
More informationCotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines. June 2016
Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines June 2016 Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines Introduction The evolution of the landscape of the Cotswolds AONB is a result of the interaction
More information4.6. Low Impact and Retentive Grading
4.6. Low Impact and Retentive Grading Low Impact Grading techniques focus on utilizing existing topography during Site layout to minimize cost. Proposing structures, roads, and other impervious surfaces
More informationProposed Southland District Plan 2012 Appeal Version October 2016
S e c t i o n 3. 5 - F i o r d l a n d / R a k i u r a Z o n e The Fiordland/Rakiura Zone encompasses the Fiordland and Rakiura National Parks and part of Mt Aspiring National Park. It also includes areas
More informationLewisville Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 2 & 4, 2017
Lewisville Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 2 & 4, 2017 Presented By Rob Jordan Lake Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District US Army Corps of Engineers Purpose
More informationMcCormick Pit Category 1 Class A License, Pit Below Water For Blueland Farms Limited. Visual Impact Assessment Report February 2013
McCormick Pit Category 1 Class A License, Pit Below Water For Blueland Farms Limited Visual Impact Assessment Report February 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... v 1.0 BACKGROUND... 1 Figure 1.
More informationLower Sensitivity. VS Classification Level 2: Exposed Upland/Plateau
S05 Y Moelwynion Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey map with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty s Stationery Office, Crown copyright Licence No. 100023387 Location
More informationCHAPTER 26 LANDSCAPING (Chapter added in its entirety 05-08)
CHAPTER 26 LANDSCAPING (Chapter added in its entirety 05-08) 26.01 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE. Landscaping is an important element of the use, development and preservation of land, and a significant factor
More informationFile No (Continued)
(Continued) Request for: (1) a Site Plan Review; (2) a Variance (to build on a significant ridgeline); (3) an Oak Tree Permit (to encroach into the protected zone of 25 oak trees and for potential thinning
More informationVolume 2, Chapter 12 - Revegetation
Volume 2, Chapter 12 - Revegetation Users Guidance: If a UDFCD Section number in this chapter is skipped: It was adopted as is; please refer to that Section in the corresponding UDFCD Manual, Volume, Chapter
More informationSTORMWATER SITE PLAN INSTRUCTIONS AND SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE Medium and Large Projects
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Tel: 360.379.4450 Fax: 360.379.4451 Web: www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment E-mail: dcd@co.jefferson.wa.us STORMWATER
More informationADDENDUM TO BIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY REPORT, BOTANICAL SURVEY AND WETLAND DELINEATION
ADDENDUM TO BIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY REPORT, BOTANICAL SURVEY AND WETLAND DELINEATION FOR AVALON INN (APN 069-241-27 & -04) 1201 & 1211 NORTH MAIN STREET FORT BRAGG, CA MENDOCINO COUNTY prepared for:
More informationTERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM STRATEGY APPENDIX F: MODEL POLICIES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TARGET TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM
TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM STRATEGY APPENDIX F: MODEL POLICIES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TARGET TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM C H A P T E R 1 M O D E L P O L I C I E S F O R I M P L
More informationChapter 5: Recreation
Chapter 5: Recreation Introduction and Setting Recreational opportunities within Nevada County are varied, ranging from public parks with intensively used active recreational facilities, to vast tracts
More informationROSEMONT 138kV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT. Public Open House Meeting #2 August 27, 2009
ROSEMONT 138kV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT Public Open House Meeting #2 August 27, 2009 Project Overview Tucson Electric Power (TEP), as a part of its obligation to serve, is proposing to construct and operate
More information3.16 Visual Affected Environment. Sterling Highway MP Project Draft SEIS Chapter 3, Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences
3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3.16 Visual 3.16.1 Affected Environment Sterling Highway MP 45 60 Project Draft SEIS This section identifies existing scenic resources within the project
More informationPlan of Development Mountain Valley Pipeline Project. APPENDIX M Winter Construction Plan
APPENDIX M October 20, 2017 Appendix M Prepared by: October 20, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... M-1 2.0 STABILIZATION/WINTERIZATION... M-2 3.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES... M-3 4.0
More informationPublic Information Meeting
Lavon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 10, 2015 Presented By Michael Kinard Lake Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District US Army Corps of Engineers Purpose of
More informationCity of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission
++ City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission Meeting Date: January 08, 2018 Staff: Subject: Chris Juram, Planning Technician SS12-17 Miramar Homebuilders, R-20 Zoning: Request
More informationErrol Heights Park and Community Garden Frequently Asked Questions March 22, 2018
Errol Heights Park and Community Garden Frequently Asked Questions March 22, 2018 Question 1: What improvements are planned for Errol Heights Park? How will the community be engaged in the process to shape
More informationCHAPTER 10 AESTHETICS
CHAPTER 10 AESTHETICS CHAPTER 10 AESTHETICS This section identifies and evaluates key visual resources in the project area to determine the degree of visual impact that would be attributable to the project.
More informationNOTICE OF PREPARATION
NOTICE OF PREPARATION DATE: January 6, 2016 TO: LEAD AGENCY: Responsible Agencies, Organizations, and Interested Parties Contact: Tyler Barrington, Principal Planner Planning Department Community Development
More informationCOMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent
COMMUNITY DESIGN Intent An attractive, well-designed County will attract quality development, instill civic pride, improve the visual character of the community, and create a strong, positive image for
More information36.1. PURPOSE APPLICABILITY DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 36: DESIGN STANDARDS 36.1. PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that projects are designed and constructed consistent with the Community Design Subelement of the Land Use Element and
More informationATTACHMENT A. SILVERDALE DESIGN STANDARDS Amendments to the Waaga Way Town Center Chapter
ATTACHMENT A SILVERDALE DESIGN STANDARDS Amendments to the Waaga Way Town Center Chapter Chapter 10. Waaga Way Town Center 10.1 Physical Identity Elements & Opportunities The Waaga Way Town Center includes
More informationVisual Impact Assessment January 2013
Measures Maintain as much natural vegetation as possible between the mine buildings and the perimeter of the mine. The layout for mine buildings should include vegetation such as trees and thicket to break
More informationMaster Plan Objectives and Policies
Master Plan Objectives and Policies Introduction This chapter identifies the Park issues and recommended policies established by this Master Plan. The issues were identified through meetings with staff,
More informationImage and the Built Environment
Chapter 1 Image and the Built Environment A land ethic, then, reflects the existence of an ecological conscience, and this in turn reflects a conviction of individual responsibility for the health of the
More informationVisual Assessment and Addendum
Seward Highway Milepost 75 90 Road and Bridge Rehabilitation Project Visual Assessment and Addendum January 2016 Contents: Addendum for the MP 88 Variant Errata: The and Addendum for the MP 88 Variant
More informationMendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft Vers
4 Parks and Trails The City of Mendota Heights boasts a variety of recreational and open space opportunities. Few cities can claim access to regional trails, riverside and lakeside parks, scenic bluffs
More informationARTICLE 3 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS
ARTICLE 3 CHAPTER 4 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS SEC 3.401 SEC 3.402 (D) (E) PURPOSE: The purpose of this Chapter is to establish minimum standards for the design, installation, and maintenance
More informationAPPENDIX C: HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (prev. Ordinance #2008-1)
APPENDIX C: HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (prev. Ordinance #2008-1) 1. PURPOSE: The purpose of this section is to define the conditions under which hillside development may occur that will not result
More informationKey elements : Filter Strips must be designed within parameters required by the Fort Wayne s Development Standards/Criteria Manual.
4.4. Filter Strips Filter Strips are densely vegetated lands that treat sheet flow storm water from adjacent pervious and impervious areas. They function by slowing runoff, trapping sediment and pollutants,
More informationLoam: About 40% sand, 40% silt, 20% clay. Mixture of pore sizes to balance water retention and aeration. Considered the best soil for growing crops.
Soil Characteristics Soil is formed from a combination of two Primary sources: Weathering of Parent Rock ( ) = material introduced by plants, animals, and decomposers Minor sources: Nutrients incorporated
More informationCHAPTER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE
CITY OF MOSES LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 18.31 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE Sections: 18.31.010 Purpose 18.31.020 Minimum Lot Area 18.31.030 Setbacks 18.31.040 Maximum
More informationVisual Analysis. Prepared for: State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. and
Prepared for: State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities and Prepared by: HDR Alaska, Inc. 2525 C Street, Suite 305 Anchorage, AK 99503 Land Design North/USKH 2515 A Street Anchorage,
More informationGlenn Highway MP DSR. Landscape Narrative
Glenn Highway MP 34-42 DSR Landscape Narrative Project Landscape Goals The Glenn Highway MP 34-42 Project extends through a variety of landscape types typical to the Matanuska-Susitna Valley. In general,
More informationLandscaping Standards
CHAPTER 29 ARTICLE 403 29.403 Landscaping Standards Purpose: The purpose of this section is to protect and promote the public health, safety and general welfare by requiring landscaping in relation to
More informationVisual Impact Assessment 830 Pratt Avenue St Helena, CA
Visual Impact Assessment 830 Pratt Avenue St Helena, CA 1. Introduction The following aesthetic visual impact assessment has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The
More informationDRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4
DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4 SW 24 TH AVENUE ROADWAY CORRIDOR The University of Florida participates with the Metropolitan Transportation Planning Organization (MTPO) in its responsibilities for the continuing,
More informationSeiad Creek Legacy Roadbed Rehabilitation Project Soil Report
KLAMATH NATIONAL FOREST Seiad Creek Legacy Roadbed Rehabilitation Project Soil Report Happy Camp Oak Knoll Ranger District Joe Blanchard 5/21/2014 Prepared by Joe Blanchard Forest Soil Scientist Klamath
More informationINTRODUCTION. 1.1 What is a General Plan? 1.2 Requirements for a General Plan. 1.3 Introduction to Monterey County
1.1 What is a General Plan? INTRODUCTION California state law requires each city and county to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city, and any
More informationLandowner's Guide to the Lower St. Croix Riverway. Protect. Restore. Celebrate. stcroixriverassociation.org
Landowner's Guide to the Lower St. Croix Riverway Protect. Restore. Celebrate. stcroixriverassociation.org Cover and page spread photographs by Craig Blacklock. For more information on how to be a river
More informationIV. Development in the Rural Overlay District
Intracoastal Waterway Route 17 Route 168 Great Dismal Swamp VIRGINIA NORTH CAROLINA IV. Development in the Rural Overlay District IV-1 Route 17 in Chesapeake s Rural Overlay District affords distant views
More information5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and,
Article 5. Landscaping 5.1 Purpose The Town of Laurel Park s landscape standards are designed to create a beautiful, aesthetically pleasing built environment that will complement and enhance community
More informationDOCKETED 09-RENEW EO-1
Karen Douglas Charlton H. Bonham Commissioner Director California Energy Commission California Department of Fish an Wildlife 1516 Ninth Street 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814
More informationAppendix A Terminology and Component Changes
Appendix A Terminology and Component Changes Numerous changes in terminology were made when The Visual Management Sys-tem was updated. Following are lists of terminology changes in the Scenery Management
More informationApplicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code
Master Development Plan Application Community Development Department City of Redmond 411 SW 9 th Street Redmond, Oregon 97756 541-923-7721 541-548-0706 FAX Master Development Plan Fee $38,862.52 File Number
More informationSnohomish County Planning and Development Services
Snohomish County Planning and Development Services John Lovick County Executive Clay White, Director 3000 Rockefeller Avenue M/S #604 Everett, WA 98201-4046 unchomish COUNT (425).Jgtg. Ax (425) 3 ^v32
More informationConservation Corridor Planning and Green Infrastructure Themes
Conservation Corridor Planning and Green Infrastructure Themes Prepared by the Green Infrastructure Center Inc. and the Northern Virginia Regional Commission February 22, 2011 Brief Overview Project Background
More informationStormwater Standards. Clackamas County Service District No. 1. Planting Guide for Buffers
Stormwater Standards Clackamas County Service District No. 1 APPENDIX B Planting Guide for Buffers Table of Contents Appendix B - Planting Guide for Buffers... Page B.1 General... 1 B.1.1 Introduction...
More information3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.
This section of the Draft EIR addresses the existing land uses on and adjacent to the project site and discusses the potential impacts of the proposed project on existing land uses. Key issues addressed
More informationPhiladelphia Creek Trash Assessment (PCTA) Methodology Mill Run Creek Test Case
Philadelphia Creek Trash Assessment (PCTA) Methodology Mill Run Creek Test Case Mill Run Creek emerges from a covered creek in Philadelphia to an open creek in Cheltenham. The Creek has extensive trash
More informationSection 3 Non-Structural BMPs
3.1 Stream Buffers A stream buffer or stream setback is a designated area around a stream, lake, or wetland left in a natural, densely vegetated state so as to protect the receiving water quality and provide
More information