Ward: Southbourne. White Croft 14 Breach Avenue Southbourne West Sussex PO10 8NB

Transcription

1 Parish: Southbourne Ward: Southbourne Proposal Site SB/15/01827/FUL Erection of a detached chalet bungalow. White Croft 14 Breach Avenue Southbourne West Sussex PO10 8NB Map Ref (E) (N) Applicant Mr Christopher Snape RECOMMENDATION TO PERMIT WITH S106 NOT TO SCALE Note: Do not scale from map. For information only. Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Mapping with the permission of the controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright. License No Reason for Committee Referral Parish Objection - Officer recommends Permit 2.0 The Site and Surroundings 2.1 The application site lies to the southern side of Breach Avenue and to the east of Wentworth Drive, a private road serving 4 houses, with a Public Right of Way alongside. It is located within the settlement boundary of Southbourne, north of the south coast railway line. 2.2 The site comprises an existing detached chalet bungalow on a particularly wide plot for the street. There is a detached single garage to the west of the bungalow and a large overgrown garden, which extends to the south. The western boundary comprises of low level 1.2m high close boarded fencing and number of trees and shrubs. To the east and west of the site are detached bungalows, with gable ends and the property to the west has two east facing dormers. Breach Avenue is residential in character, with detached dwellings comprising of a mix of architectural styles and ages on each side of the road. 3.0 The Proposal 3.1 The proposal seeks to erect an additional dwelling on the area of garden land to the west of the existing chalet bungalow. The existing garage would be demolished and the existing property would also undergo renovations. The site measures 21m in width and 31m in length and would be divided in half, with each plot having a frontage of 10m. 3.2 The proposed new dwelling would be of a similar architectural style and scale as the existing property. The entrance to the property would be to the east, which would lead into hallway with open plan kitchen, dining area and lounge, separate study and W/C. Two flat roof dormers would be situated to either side roofslope, allowing for the provision of three bedrooms, with one ensuite and a family bathroom. The dwelling would have smooth

2 rendered elevations beneath a clay tiled roof. The existing dwelling would be refurbished, with upgraded windows, a replacement slate roof and re-rendered. 3.3 To the front of each property there would be provision for three parking spaces and the access would be widened to accommodate this. The plum tree to the north west corner would be removed and replanted in the same location with a new specimen History Nil 5.0 Constraints Listed Building NO Conservation Area NO Rural Area NO AONB Buffer Zone Strategic Gap NO Tree Preservation OrdeNO South Downs National NO Park EA Flood Zone NO - Flood Zone 2 - Flood Zone 3 Settlement Boundary YES Historic Parks and Gardens NO 6.0 Representations and Consultations 6.1 Parish Council Objection - the Parish Council considers that the plot size is too small for in filling. Substitute Plans Southbourne Parish Council's Planning Committee considered the revised plans for the application and reiterated what it said before, namely that the proposed development was too large for the size of the plot. 6.2 WSCC - Highways No objection The application seeks approval for a 4 bedroom chalet style bungalow adjacent to an existing bungalow. Through the proposals, 3 parking spaces will be made available for the new dwelling and existing dwelling, creating 6 off-street parking spaces in total on new

3 private driveways. A turn on site for each dwelling will not be achievable, but given the class and nature of the road and the fact that neighbouring properties in the area operate similar driveways, this would not amount to a highway safety issue. The site will have an open frontage, allowing for suitable pedestrian visibility ensuring safety when crossing the adjacent footway. The site is within a sustainable location and cycle parking is also proposed for each dwelling, therefore mitigating the demand on parking in the area. No concerns wished to be raised to this application subject to a condition securing the parking and cycle parking. The applicant will need to apply for a crossover licence to secure the highways works prior to commencement. 6.3 Four Third Party Objections have been received concerning the following: a) Fails to meet aims of sustainable development b) Inappropriate density of development, c) Conflicts with policy, including Neighbourhood Plan. d) Overlooking 6.4 One Third Party comment has been received highlighting that car parking space is essential. 7.0 Planning Policy The Development Plan 7.1 The Development Plan for Chichester District comprises the saved policies of the Chichester District Local Plan First Review 1999 and all adopted neighbourhood plans. There is no adopted neighbourhood plan for Southbourne at this time, although there will be a referendum on 5th November The principal planning policies relevant to the consideration of this application are as follows: Chichester Local Plan: Key Policies Policy 1: Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development Policy 2: Development Strategy and Settlement Hierarchy Policy 33: New Residential Development Policy 39: Transport, Accessibility and Parking Policy 49: Biodiversity Policy 50: Development and Disturbance of Birds in Chichester and Langstone Harbours Special Protection Areas National Policy and Guidance 7.3 Government planning policy comprises the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). At the heart of the NPPF is a presumption in favour of sustainable development, which should be seen as a golden thread running through both plan-making and decision-taking.

4 This means unless material considerations indicate otherwise development proposals that accord with the development plan should be approved without delay. 7.5 Consideration should also be given to paragraph 17 (Core Planning Principles), together with sections 6 and 7 generally. 7.6 The government's New Homes Bonus (NHB) which was set up in response to historically low levels of housebuilding, aims to reward local authorities who grant planning permissions for new housing. Through the NHB the government will match the additional council tax raised by each council for each new house built for each of the six years after that house is built. As a result, councils will receive an automatic, six-year, 100 per cent increase in the amount of revenue derived from each new house built in their area. It follows that by allowing more homes to be built in their area local councils will receive more money to pay for the increased services that will be required, to hold down council tax. The NHB is intended to be an incentive for local government and local people, to encourage rather than resist, new housing of types and in places that are sensitive to local concerns and with which local communities are, therefore, content. Section 143 of the Localism Act which amends S.70 of the Town and Country Planning Act makes certain financial considerations such as the NHB, material considerations in the determination of planning applications for new housing. The amount of weight to be attached to the NHB will be at the discretion of the decision taker when carrying out the final balancing exercise along with the other material considerations relevant to that application. Other Local Policy and Guidance 7.7 The aims and objectives of the Council's Sustainable Community Strategy are material to the determination of this planning application. These are: B1 - Managing a changing environment D1 - Increasing housing supply D3 - Housing fit for purpose 8.0 Planning Comments 8.1 The main issues arising from this proposal are: i) The principle of the development ii) Impact on the amenity of neighbouring occupiers iii) Character of street scene iv) Highway Safety v) Recreational Disturbance Mitigation Assessment i)principle of development 8.2 The application site is located within the defined settlement boundary of Southbourne, as set out in the Chichester Local Plan (CLP), and within the emerging Soutbourne

5 Neighbourhood Plan. Within the defined settlement boundary, the principle of new dwellings is considered acceptable, subject to compliance with other material considerations. Southbourne is considered a highly sustainable location and is designated as a service village in Policy 2 of the CLP. Southbourne has a wide range of services and facilities including access to regular public transport, primary, secondary and higher education and local shops. It is therefore considered that the site lies in a sustainable location, within a defined settlement for which the principle of additional dwellings is considered acceptable. ii) Impact on neighbouring amenity 8.3 The NPPF states in paragraph 17 that planning should ensure a good quality of amenity for all existing and future occupiers of land and buildings, and policy 33 of the CLP include requirements to protect the amenities of neighbouring properties. 8.4) The existing host dwelling includes two first floor habitable room windows on the west elevation, facing the proposed dwelling. The proposed dwelling to the west of the site includes a large, flat roofed dormer window on the east elevation comprising two bathroom windows, which would be conditioned to be obscure glazed, and a window providing light into the stairs. Due to the use of the spaces the windows are serving and the obscure glazing, it is not considered there would be any interlooking between the existing and proposed dwelling. 8.5) The proposed dwelling would have one habitable room window at first floor level on the west elevation. This would be set approximately 14m away from the neighbouring property to the west, with the intervening private driveway providing a feel of separation. It would be directly opposite the neighbours obscure glazed bathroom window. Any views into the other dormer windows to the neighbouring property would be at an oblique angle, mitigating any overlooking impacts. Due to the distance from the neighbouring property, the intervening access road, and the design of the proposal it is not considered there would be any overbearing impacts on neighbouring amenity. 8.6)To the front of the proposed dwelling there would be three windows serving the first floor bedroom. The separation distance to the neighbours is in excess of 20m which would be in line with CDC Design Guidance and therefore an acceptable relationship. To the rear there would be three windows and these would look onto the side blank flank of the neighbouring property 1 Wentworth Drive and is considered to be an acceptable relationship. iii) Character of street scene 8.7) The proposed chalet bungalow has been designed to respect the traditional design and appearance of other properties along Breach Avenue. The scheme includes the use of traditional materials comparable to those on the existing dwelling, and as used in many other properties along Breach Avenue. The use of rendered elevations and clay tiles for the roofing is characteristic of numerous properties in this location, and the flat roofed dormers, which have been set down from the ridgeline, and sit comfortably within the roof space are sympathetic to the overall appearance of the building, and in keeping with other chalet bungalows along the street. The frontage of the two properties would be 10m respective and is comparable to those existing residential dwellings on the street. 8.8) It considered the design of the proposed dwelling would be sympathetic to the mixed character of other residential properties in the street scene. Furthermore, the subdivision of the plot still allows for adequate size frontages of 10m, which would be in keeping with the

6 overriding character of the street scene. The proposal would therefore comply with the provisions of policy 33 of the CLP. iv) Highway Safety 8.8) There would be provision for three parking spaces off road for each dwelling and there are examples of off road parking in the street, meaning it would be sufficiently in keeping with character of the street scene. It is acknowledged that it will require the cars to reverse onto the public highway, this is not uncommon in this location, and the lightly trafficked street ensures that West Sussex County Council as Highway Authority do not consider there to be a highway safety concern with the proposal. The proposal therefore accords with policy in respect of highway safety. v) Recreational Disturbance 8.10 The site lies within the 5.6km 'zone of influence' of the Chichester and Langstone Harbours Special Protection Area, and as such could have significant environmental impacts on this internationally important designation. To mitigate against this, the applicant has provided a signed and completed S106 Unilateral Undertaking and made a financial contribution to overcome the harm of the development. It is therefore considered that the proposal complies with the provisions of Policy 50 of the CLP It is therefore considered that the proposal would not result in a significant environmental impact on the Harbours Special Protection Area. Significant Conditions 8.12 It is considered proportionate to attach a condition which would restrict alterations and additions to the dwellings and the insertion of new windows to prevent overlooking impacts. Conditions to ensure the bathroom and stairwell windows at first floor in the proposed dwelling would be obscure glazed, to prevent interlooking and details of the landscaping proposals and screen walls or fencing are recommended in the interests of visual amenity. A condition is also imposed to ensure the parking remains as approved. Conclusion 8.13 Based on the above assessment it is considered the proposal complies with development plan policies and therefore the application is recommended for approval. Human Rights 8.14 In reaching this conclusion the Human Rights of the applicants and nearby occupiers have been taken into account when reaching this recommendation and it is concluded that the recommendation to permit is justified and proportionate. RECOMMENDATION PERMIT WITH S106

7 1 A01F Time Limit - Full 2 U No Departure from Plans 3 F01F Materials/Finishes 4 U No Extensions without Approval 5 U Obscure Glazed Windows 6 U No Windows in Roof 7 K01H Landscaping 8 K02G Landscaping 9 M03F Walls/Fences 10 U Car Parking as Plans INFORMATIVES 11 W25G Need for Highway Authority Consent 12 W45F Application Approved Following Revisions For further information on this application please contact Fjola Stevens on