Butchers Hill. Greening Feasibility FINAL REPORT MAY 2009 N PORT ST N WOLFE ST S MADEIRA ST. Submitted To: Submitted By:
|
|
- Crystal Roberts
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 S WOLFE ST N CASTLE ST N WASHINGTON ST S WASHINGTON ST S CHAPEL ST S DURHAM ST S DUNCAN ST N MADEIRA ST N MONTFORD AVE Butchers Hill Greening Feasibility N DUNCAN ST MULLIKIN ST N PORT ST N WOLFE ST E FAYETTE ST N CHAPEL ST N CHESTER ST N BRADFORD ST E FAIRMOUNT AVE MOYER ST E BALTIMORE ST BOYER S CASTLE ST S CHESTER ST BOYER ST S PATTERSON PARK AVE E LOMBARD ST E PRATT ST S MADEIRA ST S COLLINGTON AVE FINAL REPORT MAY 2009 Submitted By: Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP Consulting Engineers Baltimore, Maryland Submitted To: Baltimore City Department of Public Works Water Quality Management Office Baltimore, Maryland
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Neighborhood Description... 1 Greening Techniques... 2 Corner Curb Bump-outs... 2 Flow Through Planters... 3 Tree Planting Strips... 3 Site Descriptions... 4 Site 1: Collington Avenue between Baltimore and Fairmount... 5 Option A: Corner Bump-Out at Baltimore Street... 5 Option B: Corner Bump-Out at Fairmount Street... 6 Site 2: Fairmount Avenue at Chester Street... 7 Option A: Corner Bump-Out at Fairmount Avenue and Chester Street... 7 Option B: Flow Through Planters or Tree Planting Strips... 8 Site 3: Collington Avenue between Lombard and Baltimore Streets... 9 Option A: Flow Through Planter or Tree Planting Strips... 9 Option B: Corner Bump-Out at Collington and Lombard Site 4: Chester Street between Lombard and Pratt Streets Option A: Chester Street East Option B: Chester Street West Conclusion References Appendix A: Drainage Area Schematics Appendix B: Sample Calculations Appendix C: Estimated Projected Costs i
3 Introduction Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP (RKK) was asked to perform a feasibility study searching for possible locations for greening enhancements within the Butchers Hill neighborhood. The Butchers Hill Neighborhood Association is currently developing a master plan and design guidelines for improvements within the neighborhood. The master plan includes improving street parking, greening techniques, traffic calming techniques as well as aesthetic guidelines. RKK was asked to conduct an initial survey of the area using GIS provided information for elevation contours, storm drain, water, and sewer system locations and prioritize four sites within the neighborhood to implement greening techniques as example for the rest of the neighborhood. Neighborhood Description Butchers Hill is located on the east side of Baltimore City, just west of Patterson Park. The neighborhood is bordered by Fayette Street to the north, Pratt Street to the south, Washington Street to the west, and Patterson Park Avenue to the east, see Figure 1. The neighborhood is almost completely residential and comprised of attached row homes. There is one Baltimore City Public School located in the block bounded by Fayette, Fairmount, Washington and Chester Streets. The school consists of several buildings, two parking lots, a basketball court and an amphitheater and lawn section. There is also one small area park located in the center of the block bounded by Fairmount, Baltimore, Washington and Chester Streets. The park is approximately 0.75 acre and Figure 1: Butchers Hill Boundary Map consists of walking paths, green space, and a mulched play ground. There is another small park, the Charles M. Halcott Square, located on South Duncan Street between Lombard and Pratt Streets. This park is approximately 0.1 acre and consists of a paved walking path and planters. Other than the amphitheater lawn and the neighborhood parks, most of the neighborhood is comprised of impervious surfaces. Few houses have grass lawns, most have paved parking pads. The community is known for its tree lined streets. Every major street is lined with trees, however the trees are encased in concrete sidewalks and do not provide room for water storage. Butchers Hill is comprised of several wide, free flowing streets as well as many small and narrow alleys. Each major street also provides street parking for the neighborhood residents and visitors. The wide streets tend to have heavier traffic. Part of the 1
4 Neighborhood Association s Master Plan is to reduce traffic speeds on some of the wider streets by implementing traffic calming measures. Additionally, they may increase available parking by changing some streets to one-way and creating diagonal parking. This also helps in traffic calming. The transforming of two-way streets to one-way streets has already begun in some parts of the neighborhood. The Master Plan also contains guidelines for streetscaping practices such as greening, parking, plantings, and cross walk enhancements. Greening Techniques The Neighborhood Association s Master Plan describes two main techniques that may be used for greening, traffic calming and also water quality control. Corner Curb Bump-outs Corner Curb Bump-outs are small bioretention systems placed at the corner of a block to trap and infiltrate runoff from the adjoining streets. They can be placed at most intersections, however they are at the greatest advantage at streets where there is diagonal parking. This allows more surface area for storage. The bump-out helps to define the limits of available parking, reduces the pedestrian cross walk length and acts as a traffic calming device while capturing and treating street runoff. The bioretention system can take on various shapes around the corner, providing various amounts of water quality treatment. Two different configurations are shown in Figures 2A and 2B, as shown in the Butchers Hill Master Plan. The water is treated in the planting area and the bioretention soils below, infiltrated into an underdrain pipe and released to a nearby storm drain. Figure 2: A) Bioretention on one street, B) Bioretention on both streets For computational purposes, the bump-outs were considered to be around 600-sq ft on average (based off of approximate dimensioning from Master Plan assuming two street bioretention) with 2.5-ft of bioretention material with a permeability factor of 0.5-ft/day. Additionally, a 0.5-ft ponding area and 2 day retention time were assumed. 2
5 Flow Through Planters Flow through planters are a bioretention technique used in urban areas to trap runoff from sidewalks and streets in planter boxes on the sidewalk with trees and other vegetation. Figure 3 shows a photograph of flow through planters shown in the Butchers Hill Master Plan. The planters can be placed the length of a street within the sidewalk. The water is directed to the planter through trench drains and curb cuts and is retained within the soils in the planter. The water then drains to an underdrain which empties into a nearby storm drain. The flow through planters have limited storage area due to the size of the Figure 3: Flow through planters sidewalk and available space. The planters are often placed 1-2ft in from the sidewalk/road edge to allow room for cars to open doors. This often requires increasing the width of the sidewalk by reducing driving space. Streets where diagonal parking will be implemented may be able to add the additional required space for flow through planters. The planters are filled with low vegetation and small trees. The trees currently in the Butchers Hill sidewalks would need to be replaced. For computational purposes, the flow through planters were considered to be 4-ft wide with 2.5-ft of bioretention material with a permeability factor of 0.5-ft/day. Additionally, a 0.5-ft ponding area and 2 day retention time were assumed. Tree Planting Strips Figure 4: Tree planting strip A planting strip is the pervious area between the back edge of the curb and the sidewalk. It can be continuous or segmented and is usually planted with grass and trees. Butchers Hill s streets all contain trees in the outer edge of the sidewalk, near the curb edge. Planting strips would replace the sidewalk surrounding these trees and provide a pervious buffer. The planting strips do not provide any water quality treatment or storage, but would decrease the amount of impervious 3
6 space within the neighborhood. Figure 4 shows a typical tree planting strip along a brick paved sidewalk. The strip provides an aesthetic buffer between the roadway and the sidewalk. The strip also allows for large diameter trees to grow. Site Descriptions RKK was asked to identify four possible sites within the Butchers Hill neighborhood where greening techniques such as those described above could be implemented. Baltimore City provided GIS data for water main, sewer main, and storm drain horizontal locations. Elevation contours were also provided. The sites needed to impact as few utilities as possible and also have a large enough drainage area to sustain the bioretention facility. Four main locations were selected, however each site has a varied level of options within the site to offer more water quality treatment at a higher level of impact. RKK was also asked to develop a set of criteria to prioritize the sites. There are many factors that could go into this category. Three main criteria were used to prioritize the sites. Impacts to utilities Ability to treat available drainage area Percentage of water quality volume treated Ease of implementation Impacts to trees Impacts to sidewalks Impacts to roadways Proximity to outlet storm drain Changes required to storm drain system In general, sites impacting known utilities were not included, or were very low on the prioritization. The sites that were able to provide enough surface area to treat all of their water quality volume were high on the priority list. And those projects that may treat a high percentage of water quality volume but were more difficult to implement were placed lower on the list. Of the four ranked sites, each site has another subset of options for higher or lower level impacts. Each option within the subset is also ranked. The following section gives a description of each greening site. Table 1 gives a summary of each greening option and its ranking. 4
7 Site 1: Collington Avenue between Baltimore and Fairmount Collington Avenue between Baltimore and Fairmount Streets is a wide, one-way street that has already been transformed with back in entry angled parking on the right hand side of the road. The left hand side remains parallel parking. The street is relatively quiet as it is not inline with its connecting streets at either end. The street peaks near the center, dividing the drainage area to half to the Baltimore Street end and half to the Fairmount Street end. Option A: Corner Bump-Out at Baltimore Street Figure 5: Bump-out at Collington and Baltimore As seen in the above photograph, Collinton Ave is already an angled parking street. Baltimore Street remains parallel parking. A curb bump-out at this location would catch drainage coming down Collington Street as well as a small portion coming down Baltimore Street. This location would provide at least two bioretention cells, a third if a parking spot is taken from Baltimore Street. The green shaded area shows a likely location for the bump-out. The grayed areas show the potential sidewalk cuts through the retention area. The bump-outs reduce the length of pedestrian cross walk needed. This site would not be affecting the water or sewer mains. The existing storm drain inlet at the curb would need to be closed, however this provides excellent proximity to outlet drainage to the storm drain system. No adjustments would be required to parking, unless desired. No trees will be impacted. Minimal sidewalk replacement would be necessary. The site provides water quality treatment as well as traffic calming measures and aesthetic interest. 5
8 Option B: Corner Bump-Out at Fairmount Street Figure 6: Bump-out at Collington and Farimount This option would be the higher level of impact addition to Option A for this site. This is the other end of Collington Avenue with the back in entry angled parking on the right hand side of the road. Fairmount Avenue is a two-way street with parallel parking. As described earlier, the drainage area for this street is divided, this facility would receive drainage from the north half of the street and a small amount from Fairmount Ave. The green shaded area shows the bump-out location. This facility also has room for at least two bioretention cells, a third if more space is taken from Farimount Avenue. The gray areas are the sidewalk extensions; the pedestrian cross walk lengths are shortened. This facility is a higher level of impact addition to the Collington Ave site. A sewer main runs down the street and a manhole (seen in picture) would most likely be affected by the bump out. The depth of the sewer main is also unknown and could be impacted. No parking adjustments would be required unless desired. No trees are impacted. The connecting storm drain is on the west side of Collinton Ave, therefore some roadwork would be needed to connect the underdrain to the storm drain system. Minimal sidewalk replacement would be necessary. The site provides water quality treatment as well as traffic calming measures and aesthetic interest, however has some utility impacts and would be more costly and difficult to implement. 6
9 Site 2: Fairmount Avenue at Chester Street Fairmount Avenue west of Chester Street is a one-way street that has already been converted to front entry angled parking on the right hand side of the road. The left hand side remains parallel parking. The sidewalk on the right hand side of the road is fairly wide, approximately 15-ft. Chester Street north of Fairmount Avenue is also a one-way south street. It has also been converted to angled parking on the right hand side, with parallel parking on the left. Option A: Corner Bump-Out at Fairmount Avenue and Chester Street Figure 7: Bump-out at Fairmount and Chester As seen in the above photograph, the intersection of Chester Street (coming from the right) and Farimount Avenue (running into the page) leaves a large area available for curb bump-out bioretention. This area receives runoff from Fairmount Avenue as well as some from Chester Street. The green shaded area above shows room enough for three bioretention cells. Additional sidewalk extensions reduce the cross-walk length. This site has no impact to water or sewer mains. The proximity to a storm drain to outlet to could be an issue. The GIS information is not fully clear at this location. Storm drain inlets are shown in the vicinity, but the connecting drains are not. There are no impacts on parking at this site. Minimal sidewalk replacement would be needed. The bump-out would provide water quality treatment for a portion of the drainage area, traffic calming, and aesthetic interest. 7
10 Option B: Flow Through Planters or Tree Planting Strips Figure 8: Bump-out at Fairmount and Chester with flow through planters Option B-1 is a higher impact addition to the corner curb bump-out bioretention facility described in Option A. The corner bump-out does not provide enough surface area to treat the entire water quality volume for the drainage area. Option B-1 is to increase the treatment area by providing flow through planters along Fairmount Avenue. This increases the drainage area, however the increase in treatment area meets the water quality volume. The flow through planters provide a barrier between the parking area and sidewalk. The sidewalk along Fairmount is fairly wide, approximately 15-ft and in need of replacement. Placement of the flow through boxes would allow for walking room and water quality treatment. An underdrain system would connect to the storm drain system at the bottom of the hill at Washington Street. This option has a high level of impact. The entire sidewalk would require replacement. There are no affects on parking or water or sewer mains. The street is lined with trees that would need to be replaced. It is unlikely that these trees would survive a transplant. The flow through boxes would be replanted with a smaller caliper tree and other vegetation. This option would provide full water quality volume treatment and aesthetic interest. Option B-2 is a lower level of impact addition to the corner bump-out. Instead of flow through planters, tree planting strips could be implemented. Tree planting strips do not provide any water quality treatment, but do decrease the amount of impervious area. The strips could be placed between the existing trees without tree removal. No impacts would be made on parking, water or sewer mains. The sidewalk would not have to be replaced entirely. This option provides aesthetic interest and reduces impervious area. 8
11 Site 3: Collington Avenue between Lombard and Baltimore Streets Collington Avenue is a one-way street running north between Lombard and Baltimore Streets. It has already been converted to back in entry angled parking on the right hand side of the street. The left hand side remains parallel parking. The street runs downhill from Baltimore to Lombard and has a crown splitting the drainage to either side of the street. Option A: Flow Through Planter or Tree Planting Strips Figure 9: Sidewalk enhancements on Collington between Lombard and Baltimore Streets Option A-1 is a high level impact option. Flow through planters along the left hand side of Collington Street would catch and treat the entire water quality volume for this drainage area. The planters could extend all the way up the street or only for a portion, depending on the designers needs. The flow through planters provide a boundary between the parking area and sidewalk. There is the possibility for a sewer main impact at the alley entrances, depending on the depth of the mains. No water mains would be affected. No changes in parking would be required. The street is tree lined. The flow through planters would require replacing the trees. It is unlikely that the existing trees would survive a transplant. The planters would contain trees of a smaller caliper as well as other vegetation. The underdrain would outlet to the storm drain system at the alternate corner of Collington and Lombard Street. Some roadwork would be needed to make the connection. This option provides full water quality treatment as well as aesthetic interest. Option A-2 is a low impact alternative to A-1. Instead of flow through planters, the street could be lined with tree planting strips. The strips would replace the existing concrete sidewalk and reduce the amount of impervious area. The planting strips do not provide water quality treatment. The strips have no impact on parking, water or sewer mains, roads and could be placed as to not affect the existing trees. The tree planting strips provide aesthetic interest and reduce impervious area. 9
12 Option B: Corner Bump-Out at Collington and Lombard Figure 10: Bump out at Collington and Lombard Street Option B is a high impact addition to Option A. Option B provides water quality treatment for the opposite half of Collington Avenue s drainage area. Collington Avenue is already a back in entry angled parking street and due to the existing fire hydrant, has a large open space at the corner of Lombard Street. This area could be made into a two cell bioretention facility, three if it extends to Lombard Street. The GIS information indicates that there are few storm drain inlets to the east of this intersection; therefore the drainage area for this site is quite large, near 1.5 acres. It is possible that the site could be inundated during large flow events. The site will only be able to treat a portion of the water quality volume for the drainage area. The sidewalk extension decreases the cross-walk length. The site does have utility conflicts. The existing fire hydrant would most likely need relocating, probably to the Lombard Street side. There are also several storm drain pipes and an inlet at this corner, which provides easy access to outletting the underdrain, but depending on the depth and location of the structures, there may be impacts. No parking impacts would be made, minimal sidewalk replacement is necessary and minimal road repair would be necessary. The site provides partial water quality treatment, traffic calming measures, and aesthetic interest. 10
13 Site 4: Chester Street between Lombard and Pratt Streets Chester Street between Lombard and Pratt Streets is still a two-way street with parallel parking. Other sections of Chester Street have been altered to one-way with angled parking, however this section remains. Chester Street is also very wide, approximately 44-ft across with approximately 14-ft sidewalks on both sides. The street is crowned dividing the drainage area. The drainage area to the west is approximately twice the size of the drainage area to the east. Option A: Chester Street East According to the GIS contours, the drainage area to the east half of Chester Street is a much more manageable size than to the west. Both Option A and B suggest the transforming of Chester Street into a one-way street running south with head in angled parking on the right hand (west) side of the road. The left hand (east) side will remain parallel parking. This adjustment will increase the amount of parking provided for the block. It will also reduce the amount of travel lane space needed and if necessary allow for a slight increase in sidewalk space. The complete adjustment of the street allows for a large number of spatial arrangements for the site. However, the low level sub-options (Options A-1, A-2, B-1, B-2) do not necessarily require the alteration of the street design. Figure 11: Sidewalk enhancement on east side of Chester between Lombard and Pratt Option A-1 is the lowest level option for this site. Tree planter strips could be added to the sidewalk between the existing tree boxes. This option provides no water quality treatment, but does reduce impervious area. This option does not require the road and parking to be readjusted. There are no impacts to parking, water or sewer mains. The existing trees could be left in place. 11
14 Option A-2 is the mid-range option for this site. Flow through planters could be place along the east sidewalk. These planters would trap and treat a portion of the water quality volume for this site. The underdrain has easy access to the storm drain system at the south end of Chester Street and Lombard. There is a sewer main crossing at Lombard-Pratt Alley, however, impacts are dependent on the depth of the structure. This option does not require readjustment of the street design, but is benefitted by it. A street redesign could increase the sidewalk width allowing for a 1-2ft buffer between the curb and the planter box allowing for car door openings. Street runoff would reach the planters through trench drains. This option does not impact parking or water mains. Sidewalk reconstruction is required, road reconstruction is minimal. The street is tree lined. The existing trees would need to be replaced. It is unlikely that the trees would survive a transplant. The flow through planters would be planted with smaller caliper trees and other vegetation. This option provides water quality treatment and aesthetic interest. Figure 12: Corner bump-out on east side of Chester between Lombard and Pratt Option A-3 is the highest impact option for this site. This option requires the adjustment of the street design to one-way as described above. This option is in addition to Option A-1 or A-2 to add increase water quality treatment. The east side of the roadway would be parallel parking. A corner bump-out would be placed at the corner of Chester and Pratt Streets. The parallel parking restricts the size of the bioretention area and so the bump-out and flow through planters will still only be able to treat a portion of the water quality volume for the drainage area. There are several storm drain inlets and pipes at the south end of the street that may be impacted by the bioretention area, however provides easy access for the underdrain. There is also a sewer main that could be affected. The bump-out requires taking at least one parallel parking space from Chester Street and possibly one from Pratt Street. This option requires sidewalk replacement and some road repair. The flow through planters require replacement of the trees as described above. This option provides partial water quality treatment, traffic calming measures, increased parking space and aesthetic interest. 12
15 Option B: Chester Street West The Chester Street West drainage area is approximately 1.4 acres. This provides significant amount of flow through any bioretention facility. It is possible that the treatment area would be inundated during high flow events. The Chester Street West options are similar to the Chester Street East options, just with a different drainage area, and if road redesign option is followed, increased space due to the angled parking. Figure 13: Sidewalk enhancement on west side of Chester between Lombard and Pratt Option B-1 is the lowest level option for this site. Tree planter strips could be added to the sidewalk between the existing tree boxes. All impacts and benefits are the same as Option A-1. Option B-2 is the mid-range option for this site. Flow through planters could be placed along the west sidewalk. All impacts and benefits are the same as Option A-2. Figure 14: Corner bump-out on west side of Chester between Lombard and Pratt 13
16 Option B-3 is the high impact option for this site. This option requires the adjustment of the street design to one-way as described above. This option is in addition to Option B-1 or B-2 to add increased water quality treatment. The west side of the roadway would be head in entry angled parking. A corner bump-out would be placed at the corner of Chester and Pratt Streets. The angled parking allows for greater surface area for the bioretention facility. The angled parking increases the number of parking spaces, therefore taking additional room for the bioretention facility will not impact the overall number of parking spaces. The bump-out facility in conjunction with the flow through planters still only treat a portion of the water quality volume for this drainage area. There are several storm drain inlets and pipes at the west corner of Chester and Pratt Streets, allowing for easy access for the underdrain, but potentially receiving impacts from the bioretention facility placement. There is also an existing fire hydrant on Chester Street that would probably require relocating. There is also a sewer main that may be affected depending on the location. This option requires the road design be reconfigured, requires sidewalk replacement and minimal road work. The flow through planters will require tree replacement as described above. This option provides partial water quality treatment, traffic calming measures, increased parking space and aesthetic interest. Figure 15: Both east and west Chester Street corner bump-outs with assumed roadway redesign. 14
17 Conclusion The Butchers Hill Neighborhood Association s Master Plan looks for a variety of ways to increase green space within the neighborhood. There are a number of ways greening can also include water quality treatment as a benefit for all. This report focused on four main sites within Butchers Hill with low, medium and high levels of impact and expense at each site for greening and water quality treatment. The following table summarizes the four sites and ranks them according to the qualities described earlier. Avoiding utility impacts was a high level of importance. Additional recognizance may be needed at each site to determine depth of structures and the location of the other utilities not available such as gas and cable lines. The volumes and areas specified within the report are approximate and based off of available GIS data. Computations were conducted assuming 100% imperviousness for the drainage areas and the approximate bioretention coefficients discussed previously. All computations follow the procedures described in the Maryland Stormwater Manual Design parameters may vary and allowable surface area may be subject to change. However, this report gives an idea as to the feasibility to this type of greening and water quality features within the Butchers Hill neighborhood. 15
18 Table 1: Site comparison for Butchers Hill greening projects Rank Site 1A Collington/Baltimore Corner Bumpout Bioretention % NO NO SOME CLOSE SD Drainage Area (acres) Water Quality Volume (ft 3 ) Facility Type Surface Area Required (ft 2 ) Available Treatment Area (ft 2 ) Percent WQv Treated Requires Parking Change Requires Tree Replacement Requires Sidewalk Replacement Possible Utility Impacts 1B 2A Collington/Fairmount Corner Bumpout Fairmount/Chester Corner Bumpout Bioretention % NO NO SOME POSSIBLE Bioretention % NO NO SOME NONE 2B 3A 3B 4A 4B Fairmount 1) Flow-Thru Planters Bioretention % NO YES YES NONE 2) Grass Strips Aesthetic % NO NO NO NONE Collington 1) Flow-Thru Planters Bioretention % NO YES YES NONE 2) Grass Strips Aesthetic % NO NO NO NONE Collington/Lombard Corner Bumpout Bioretention % NO NO SOME YES Chester East 1) Grass Strips Aesthetic % NO NO NO NONE 2) Flow-Thru Planters Bioretention % NO YES YES NONE 3) Flow-Thru Planters w/ Corner Bumpouts Bioretention % YES YES YES YES Chester West 1) Grass Strips Aesthetic % NO NO NO NONE 2) Flow-Thru Planters Bioretention % NO YES YES NONE 3) Flow-Thru Planters w/ Corner Bumpouts Bioretention % YES YES YES YES 16
19 References Neighborhood Design Center/Design Collective, Inc Butchers Hill Master Plan & Design Guidelines. Butchers Hill Neighborhood Association. Baltimore, Maryland. MDE, Maryland Stormwater Design Manual Volumes I & II. Water Management Administration. Baltimore, Maryland. City of Portland Stormwater Management Manual, Revision 3. Environmental Services, City of Portland. Portland, Oregon.
20 Appendix A Drainage Area Schematics
21 S COLLINGTON AVE N COLLINGTON AVE E FAIRMOUNT AVE Water Structure Vegetation Contour-2ft E BALTIMORE ST Legend N MADEIRA ST Water Main Storm Drain Inlet Storm Drain Manhole Storm Drain 120 Sewer Structure Sewer Main Contour-10ft Potential Sites Drainage Areas 120 BUTCHERS HILL GREENING FEASIBILITY 1 inch equals 60 feet SITE 1 - COLLINGTON AVE Date: May 2009
22 LAMLEY ST N DUNCAN ST 130 N WASHINGTON ST 100 FAIRMOUNT-BALTIMORE WASHINGTON-CHESTER BUTCHERS HILL GREENING FEASIBILITY E FAIRMOUNT AVE 120 N CASTLE ST 1 inch equals 70 feet SITE 2 - FAIRMOUNT AVE Date: May N CHESTER ST Water Structure Water Main Storm Drain Sewer Structure 130 Legend MOYER ST Contour-2ft Storm Drain Inlet Storm Drain Manhole Sewer Main Vegetation 130 MOYER-BALTIMORE Contour-10ft Potential Sites Drainage Areas
23 E BALTIMORE ST 120 BOYER ST 110 S COLLINGTON AVE BOYER-LOMBARD BUTCHERS HILL GREENING FEASIBILITY S BOYER-LOMBARD E LOMBARD ST S MADEIRA ST S MADEIRA ST 1 inch equals 70 feet SITE 3 - COLLINGTON AVE Date: May S PATTERSON PARK AVE Legend Water Structure Water Main Storm Drain Inlet Storm Drain Manhole Storm Drain Sewer Structure Sewer Main Vegetation Contour-2ft Contour-10ft Potential Sites Drainage Areas
24 110 E LOMBARD ST 100 LOMBARD-ALLEY-PRATT S CHESTER ST LOMBARD-PRATT ALLEY-LOMBARD-PRATT Legend S CASTLE ST PRATT-GOUGH BUTCHERS HILL GREENING FEASIBILITY Water Structure Water Main Storm Drain Inlet E PRATT ST Storm Drain Manhole Storm Drain Sewer Structure Sewer Main Vegetation Contour-2ft Contour-10ft PRATT-GOUGH Potential Sites Drainage Areas 1 inch equals 60 feet SITE 4 - CHESTER STREET Date: May 2009 S DUNCAN ST
25 Appendix B Sample Calculations
26
27
28
29
30
31 Appendix C Estimated Projected Costs
32 ESTIMATED PROJECTED COSTS Rank Site Size Unit Price Unit Cost Collington/Baltimore Corner Bumpout Site Size = 600 SF Asphalt/Concrete Removal CY 2,680 1A Bioretention (Veg, Soils, Drain) SF 9,000 Pervious Sidewalk Pavers SF 600 Replacement Curbs LF 1,500 Replacement Pavement SY ,080 = 211 /SY 1B 2A 2B Collington/Fairmount Corner Bumpout Site Size = 600 SF Asphalt/Concrete Removal CY 2,680 Bioretention (Veg, Soils, Drain) SF 9,000 Pervious Sidewalk Pavers SF 600 Replacement Curbs LF 1,500 Replacement Pavement SY ,080 = 211 /SY Fairmount/Chester Corner Bumpout Site Size = 900 SF Asphalt/Concrete Removal CY 4,000 Bioretention (Veg, Soils, Drain) SF 13,500 Pervious Sidewalk Pavers SF 1,000 Replacement Curbs LF 3,000 Replacement Pavement SY ,950 = 220 /SY Fairmount 1) Flow-Thru Planters Site Size = 800 SF Asphalt/Concrete Removal CY 3,200 Bioretention (Veg, Soils, Drain) SF 12,000 Pervious Sidewalk Pavers 0 10 SF 0 Replacement Curbs LF 4,000 Replacement Pavement SY ,800 = 223 /SY 2) Grass Strips Site Size = 1,600 SF Sidewalk Removal CY 3,600 Top Soil, Seed, Mulch SY 630 4,230 = 24 /SY
33 Rank Site Size Unit Price Unit Cost Collington 1) Flow-Thru Planters Site Size = 690 SF Asphalt/Concrete Removal CY 3,080 Bioretention (Veg, Soils, Drain) SF 10,350 Pervious Sidewalk Pavers 0 10 SF 0 Replacement Curbs LF 3,000 3A Replacement Pavement SY ,030 = 222 /SY 2) Grass Strips Site Size = 1,000 SF Sidewalk Removal CY 2,000 Top Soil, Seed, Mulch SY 350 2,350 = 24 /SY 3B Collington/Lombard Corner Bumpout Site Size = 800 SF Asphalt/Concrete Removal CY 3,520 Bioretention (Veg, Soils, Drain) SF 12,000 Pervious Sidewalk Pavers SF 1,000 Replacement Curbs LF 2,250 Replacement Pavement SY ,220 = 216 /SY Chester East 1) Grass Strips Site Size = 1,280 SF Sidewalk Removal CY 2,800 Top Soil, Seed, Mulch SY 490 3,290 = 24 /SY 4A 2) Flow-Thru Planters Site Size = 1,280 SF Asphalt/Concrete Removal CY 5,600 Bioretention (Veg, Soils, Drain) SF 19,200 Pervious Sidewalk Pavers 0 10 SF 0 Replacement Curbs LF 7,000 Replacement Pavement SY 1,500 33,300 = 234 /SY 3) Flow-Thru Planters w/ Corner Bumpouts Site Size = 1,580 SF Asphalt/Concrete Removal CY 7,000 Bioretention (Veg, Soils, Drain) SF 23,700 Pervious Sidewalk Pavers SF 800 Replacement Curbs LF 8,000 Replacement Pavement SY 3,000 42,500 = 242 /SY
34 Rank Site Size Unit Price Unit Cost Chester West 1) Grass Strips Site Size = 1,300 SF Sidewalk Removal CY 2,900 Top Soil, Seed, Mulch SY 508 3,408 = 24 /SY 4B 2) Flow-Thru Planters Site Size = 1,300 SF Asphalt/Concrete Removal CY 5,800 Bioretention (Veg, Soils, Drain) SF 19,500 Pervious Sidewalk Pavers 0 10 SF 0 Replacement Curbs LF 7,000 Replacement Pavement SY 1,500 33,800 = 234 /SY 3) Flow-Thru Planters w/ Corner Bumpouts Site Size = 1,800 SF Asphalt/Concrete Removal CY 8,000 Bioretention (Veg, Soils, Drain) SF 27,000 Pervious Sidewalk Pavers SF 800 Replacement Curbs LF 10,000 Replacement Pavement SY 3,000 48,800 = 244 /SY These costs are approximate and for installation only. Costs exclude design and engineering fees and operation and maintenance fees.
HEALTH SCIENCES BUILDING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
INTRODUCTION In recent years, the University of Cincinnati (University) has demonstrated a commitment to identifying and implementing sustainable goals and objectives throughout University s Uptown Campuses.
More informationAPPENDIX G: TOWN ORDINANCE REVIEW
APPENDIX G: TOWN ORDINANCE REVIEW TYLin (225740) Woodard & Curran SWMP January 2013 Stormwater LID strategies, ranked for Zoning Bylaw and Site Plan Review Standards Dimensional Requirements Permit the
More informationGreen Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Technologies
Green Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Technologies The guiding principles of these technologies is to manage stormwater at their sources using natural means, and establish conditions so that
More information4. CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT
4. CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT Concept Plan Step 1: Identify Site Constraints and Opportunities Review the existing site to identify constraints and opportunities for GI Practices to meet the RRv. Constraints
More informationThird Ave CSO Integrated Green Infrastructure
Third Ave CSO Integrated Green Infrastructure Neil Myers Williams Creek Consulting OWEA Annual Conference June 2013 For growing municipalities to be perceived as world class communities, each must move
More informationNEORSD Green Infrastructure Grant (GIG) Program Opening Remarks
NEORSD Green Infrastructure Grant (GIG) Program Opening Remarks 2019 NEORSD GIG Eligibility and Technical Requirements Project must be located in the Sewer District s combined sewer area Location Applicant
More informationAppendix D - Technical Design Criteria for BMPs
Appendix D - Technical Design Criteria for BMPs City of Wayzata Page 3 On-site infiltration features Definitions and Scope: Infiltration facilities are constructed basins or depressions located in permeable
More informationSOUTH UNIVERSITY Street Design Setting a Direction for Schematic Design
1 SOUTH UNIVERSITY Street Design Setting a Direction for Schematic Design Meeting Agenda 2 1. Project Scope 2. Design Direction 3. Design Details 4. Schedule and Construction Logistics 3 SOUTH UNIVERSITY
More informationn1. Design 5.4.6a Urban Bioretention 5.4.6a Urban Bioretention Variations: Planter box, Extended tree pits, Stormwater curb extensions.
5.4.6a Urban Bioretention Variations: Planter box, Extended tree pits, Stormwater curb extensions. Description: Urban bioretention SCM are similar in function to regular bioretention practices except they
More informationGreen Stormwater Infrastructure Handbook. Kristin Kerr, P.E. EOA / SCVURPPP November 29, 2018
Green Stormwater Infrastructure Handbook Kristin Kerr, P.E. EOA / SCVURPPP November 29, 2018 Outline of Presentation Overview Handbook Contents Example Details Overview MRP requires GSI Plans to include
More informationFACT SHEET: Pervious Pavement with Infiltration
FACT SHEET: Pervious Pavement with Infiltration DESCRIPTION Pervious pavement is a Green Infrastructure (GI) technique that combines stormwater infiltration, storage, and structural pavement consisting
More informationC.3 STORMWATER TECHNICAL GUIDANCE. Table of Contents. Glossary... viii. Chapter 1 Introduction/How to Use this Handbook
C.3 STORMWATER TECHNICAL GUIDANCE Table of Contents Glossary... viii Chapter 1 Introduction/How to Use this Handbook... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of this Handbook... 1-1 1.2 What is the Countywide Program?... 1-2
More informationCOMPLETE GREEN STREET CHECKLIST
COMPLETE GREEN STREET CHECKLIST This document was developed to dissect the structure of an urban street and explore opportunities to make our streets more complete while also integrating green street strategies.
More informationMetropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts fax
Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02111 617-451-2770 fax 614-482-7185 www.mapc.org Serving the 101 Cities and Towns in the Metropolitan Boston Region MEMORANDUM
More informationMetropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts fax
Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02111 617-451-2770 fax 614-482-7185 www.mapc.org Serving the 101 Cities Towns in the Metropolitan Boston Region MEMORANDUM TO:
More informationSECTION A-1: DESCRIPTION
URBAN BIORETENTION Stormwater Planters Expanded Tree Pits Stormwater Curb Extensions VERSION 1.0 SECTION A-1: DESCRIPTION Urban bioretention practices are similar in function to regular bioretention practices
More informationTime Value of Money and Optimization Process
Time Value of Money and Optimization Process Cost Definitions Inflation increase in cost of products over time, decrease of purchasing power Recurring cost a cost that happens multiple times at regular
More information2016 WORKSHOP LVR Field Trip
2016 WORKSHOP LVR Field Trip ***Note*** Many of the sites on this tour were NOT related to, or funded by, the DGLVR program. They are being shown to encourage discussion about the kinds of projects that
More informationNorth Street Reconstruction & Integrated Stormwater Management System
OWEA Watershed Workshop-October 30 th, 2014 North Street Reconstruction & Integrated Stormwater Management System Ted Blahnik, PE Principal-Williams Creek Consulting North Street: A Case Study for Integrated
More informationCHAPTER 26 LANDSCAPING (Chapter added in its entirety 05-08)
CHAPTER 26 LANDSCAPING (Chapter added in its entirety 05-08) 26.01 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE. Landscaping is an important element of the use, development and preservation of land, and a significant factor
More informationGreen Infrastructure Overview
Green Infrastructure Overview Christopher C. Obropta, Ph.D., P.E. obropta@envsci.rutgers.edu Jeremiah Bergstrom, LLA, ASLA jbergstrom@envsci.rutgers.edu February 26, 2016 Water Resources Program NJDEP
More informationGPCID Mall Boulevard & Gwinnett Place Drive Complete Street: Sectional View of Concepts
Sectional View of Concepts PAVEMENT FEATURES PAVEMENTS INTERSECTION INTERSECTION TREATMENTS LANDSCAPE BUFFER LANDSCAPE DESIGN GPCID CD D: GWINNETT P LACE DRIVE & MALL B COMPLETE STREET DESIGN ELEMENTS
More informationGreen Infrastructure Implementation Planning for Multiple Objectives
Green Infrastructure Implementation Planning for Multiple Objectives Hazem Gheith, ARCADIS September 10, 2014 Imagine the result Integrated Plan for Stormwater Control Integrated Plan Objective Sanitary
More informationOld Mill Community Association Bioretention Facility
Project Overview This project will install a bioretention facility in a community recreation area owned by the Old Mill Community Association, Inc. Drainage from the area is currently unmanaged and has
More informationGreen Street BMP Matrix
Bioswale Can be planted with either grass or native vegetation, bioswales are best served in residential, industrial, and commercial www.duluthstreams.ogr landuse with smaller tributary drainage areas.
More informationGreen Infrastructure Recommendations For Parks and Public Spaces
Green Infrastructure Recommendations For Parks and Public Spaces Issued by the Jersey Water Works Green Infrastructure Committee And Prepared by Meliora Design This document recommends ways to integrate
More informationSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE Codes analyses for each subcommittee were completed to assist participants of the Richland County Site Planning Roundtable.
More informationChapter 6. Green Streets
Chapter 6. Green Streets Description Green streets are designed in a holistic manner that minimizes impervious surfaces, emphasizes landscaped elements, includes measures for enhancing water quality, while
More informationgreen streets San Antonio, Texas February 17-18, 2009 Chris Kloss
green streets San Antonio, Texas February 17-18, 2009 Chris Kloss www.lowimpactdevelopment.org typical pollutants Examples of Stormwater Pollutants Typical of Roads. 1,2 Pollutant Source Effects Trash
More informationKittson Parkway / Watershed Park Parking Lot
Kittson Parkway / Watershed Park Parking Lot Date Constructed: Summer 2005 Site Location / Description: Kittson Parkway, North Delta, British Columbia. Permeable parking lot adjacent to Watershed Park;
More information5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS
5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Low Impact Development (LID) requires a shift in stormwater management away from conveying runoff to a small number of downstream points through hydraulically
More informationMoon Brook FRP BMP Summary Sheet. Ownership of Land where BMP is Located
Outlet Retrofit Hitzel Terrace The town owned parcel along Hitzel Terrace is a natural wetland area which currently provides some level of stormwater detention and peak-flow attenuation. The proposed project
More informationGreen Infrastructure & Low Impact Development
Green Infrastructure & Low Impact Development CITY OF COVINGTON STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WHAT IS GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE? Green infrastructure uses vegetation, soils and natural processes to manage water and
More informationCosts Design Construction Operation Maintenance
LID Considerations Costs Design Construction Operation Maintenance LID Design Manuals New Hanover County, NC San Diego, CA City of Salinas, CA Washington, Puget Sound Partnership San Mateo Conventional
More informationSevern River Sub-Watershed: BMP 09-Retrofit
Project ID: BMP_09 Total Treated Drainage Area: 4.57 acres Total Treated Impervious Area: 2.9 acres Total Water Quality Volume (WQv): ~10,300 cubic feet; 0.236 acre-foot Rainfall Depth Treated (Pe): 1
More informationJ. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A.
J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A. Paul Guyer is a registered civil engineer, mechanical engineer, fire protection engineer, and architect with over 35 years experience in the design of buildings and related infrastructure.
More informationEdenfield Avenue Green Street Demonstration Project Neighborhood Meeting
Edenfield Avenue Green Street Demonstration Project Neighborhood Meeting Edenfield Avenue Green Street Demonstration Project Neighborhood Meeting Road Reconstruction Elements Grant Background What is a
More informationSEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES Drainage Design Options for street right of ways.
SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES Drainage Design Options for street right of ways. Numerous ecosystem-based functional stormwater quantity and quality design alternatives are possible within the street ROW. Several
More informationRain Gardens Water Quality the Way Mother Nature Intended
Rain Gardens Water Quality the Way Mother Nature Intended Maintenance Discussion Design Discussion Susan Morgan, Ph.D, PE Southern Illinois University Edwardsville smorgan@siue.edu (618) 650 5014 Michael
More informationSTORMWATER REPORT FOR WALMART SUPERCENTER STORE # SIOUX FALLS, LINCOLN COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA BFA PROJECT NO
STORMWATER REPORT FOR WALMART SUPERCENTER STORE # 2443-00 SIOUX FALLS, LINCOLN COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA BFA PROJECT NO. 3286 March 1, 2012 I hereby certify that this engineering document was prepared by me
More informationUsing Runoff Reduction Practices to Shrink the Water Quality Volume (WQv) September 18, 2018 Jay Dorsey
Using Runoff Reduction Practices to Shrink the Water Quality Volume (WQv) September 18, 2018 Jay Dorsey This Presentation Ohio EPA Post-Construction Criteria/Guidance Runoff Reduction Accounting Green
More informationConcluding Improvement Recommendations and Opinions of Probable Cost (calculated in may 2010 construction rates).
Pelican Bay Community Improvement Plan Traffic,JI Concluding Improvement Recommendations and Opinions of Probable Cost (calculated in may 2010 construction rates). D1 -A: Provide consistent signing, marking
More informationAppendix G. Detailed Design
Appendix G Detailed Design G1: Construction details Construction detail drawings usually include important details and specifications for required project design elements. This section provides information
More informationGreen Infrastructure Stormwater Management Options in an Ultra-Urban Redevelopment. Sandy Doyle-Ahern
Green Infrastructure Stormwater Management Options in an Ultra-Urban Redevelopment Sandy Doyle-Ahern sdoyleahern@emht.com + The City of Columbus Downtown Business Plan was developed in 2002 with the goal
More informationPotential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop
Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop Background The City of Cortland is developing the Tioughnioga Urban Headwaters Green Infrastructure Action Plan with funding from the National
More informationStormwater Management Techniques WMPF LAND USE TRAINING INSTITUTE MARCH 14, 2018
Stormwater Management Techniques WMPF LAND USE TRAINING INSTITUTE MARCH 14, 2018 Potential Impacts of New Development Urban development can significantly increase stormwater runoff Water quality considerations
More informationMap Reading 201: Where Does the Water Go?? Map Reading Map Reading 201. Interconnected Systems
Map Reading 201: Where Does the Water Go?? Today s Presenters: John Rozum, NEMO Program Paula Stahl, Green Valley Institute A Key Skill for Land Use Commissioners As the map is rolled out at the P&Z meeting...
More informationAppendix E: Illustrative Green Infrastructure Examples
Appendix E: Illustrative Green Infrastructure Examples Integrating LID into San Francisco s Urban Landscape Figure E. High-density Residential Figure E. Low-density Residential Figure E. Mixed Use 7 Figure
More informationThe open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape..
The open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape.. Mixed-use and infill development should maintain or enhance
More informationCosts Design Construction Operation Maintenance
LID Considerations Costs Design Construction Operation Maintenance LID Design Manuals New Hanover County, NC San Diego, CA City of Salinas, CA Washington, Puget Sound Partnership San Mateo Conventional
More informationCLAY BRICK PERVIOUS PAVEMENT CASE STUDY CITY OF NEW ALBANY
OWEA COLLECTIONS CONFERENCE 2012 CLAY BRICK PERVIOUS PAVEMENT CASE STUDY CITY OF NEW ALBANY May 10, 2012 Travis Eifert, PE, LEED AP Doug Turney, PE, CFM, LEED AP EMH&T STORMWATER MASTER PLAN VILLAGE CENTER
More informationDraft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Newark, Essex County, New Jersey Volume 3
Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Newark, Essex County, New Jersey Volume 3 Prepared for the City of Newark by the Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program April 16, 2018 Table
More informationPlanning, Design, and Construction of Green Infrastructure.
Planning, Design, and Construction of Green Infrastructure www.water.rutgers.edu What is Green Infrastructure? an approach to stormwater management that is costeffective, sustainable, and environmentally
More informationUsing Green Infrastructure To Protect Water Quality
Using Green Infrastructure To Protect Water Quality Green Infrastructure for Revitalization West Union Iowa s Green Street Pilot Project Green Pilot Streetscape Project A Sustainable Vision for West Union
More informationSustainable Storm Water Management
Incorporating Water Management into the Community Planning Process August 16, 2012 Sustainable Storm Water Management Samantha Brown Environmental Engineer SD1 SD1 s Service Area CVG Airport SD1 Service
More informationKey elements : Filter Strips must be designed within parameters required by the Fort Wayne s Development Standards/Criteria Manual.
4.4. Filter Strips Filter Strips are densely vegetated lands that treat sheet flow storm water from adjacent pervious and impervious areas. They function by slowing runoff, trapping sediment and pollutants,
More informationCase Study: City of San Mateo
Published on GreenPlan-IT (http://greenplanit.sfei.org) Home > Archived Materials > GreenPlan-IT Toolkit Demonstration Report > Chapter 2. Case Study: City of San Mateo Case Study: City of San Mateo Chapter
More informationWEFTEC.06. ** City of Caldwell, Idaho
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF URBAN STORMWATER RETROFITS AND STREAM DAYLIGHTING USING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES Sherrill Doran*, Dennis Cannon** * CH2M HILL, 322 East Front Street, Suite 200 Boise,
More informationGrass Buffer T-1. Description. Site Selection. Designing for Maintenance
Description Grass buffers are densely vegetated strips of grass designed to accept sheet flow from upgradient development. Properly designed grass buffers play a key role in LID, enabling infiltration
More informationDraft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Newark, Essex County, New Jersey Volume 2
Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Newark, Essex County, New Jersey Volume 2 Prepared for the City of Newark by the Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program April 16, 2018 Table
More information4.5 City of Indianapolis Stormwater Green Infrastructure Guidance: Bioretention (rain gardens) Bioretention Fact Sheet Bioretention Technical Design
4.5 City of Indianapolis Stormwater Green Infrastructure Guidance: Bioretention (rain gardens) Bioretention Fact Sheet Bioretention Technical Design Specification Bioretention O & M Manual Draft Green
More informationGlencoe Elementary School Parking Lot Retrofit 825 SE 51 st Street
Glencoe Elementary School Parking Lot Retrofit 825 SE 51 st Street Project Summary Project Type: Technologies: Institutional parking lot retrofit demonstration project Vegetated infiltration swale with
More informationPRELIMINARY PLAT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Updated 4/8/2016
PRELIMINARY PLAT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Updated 4/8/2016 The following items are required for the preliminary plat. Numbers correspond with those on the example preliminary plat. RENO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS
More informationACTION PLAN FOR RETROFITTING THE EXISTING MS4 WITH STRUCTURAL BMPS
ACTION PLAN FOR RETROFITTING THE EXISTING MS4 WITH STRUCTURAL BMPS FEBRUARY 16, 2017 For the City and County of Honolulu MS4 NPDES Permit No. HI S000002 STORMWATER RETROFIT BMP OPPORTUNITIES Permit Requirements
More informationGetting Started On Your Green Infrastructure (GI) Plan
Getting Started On Your Green Infrastructure (GI) Plan Peter Schultze-Allen EOA Inc. Annual SCVURPPP C3 Workshop June 16, 2015 Presentation Outline MRP 2.0 C.3.j (GI) requirements GI Framework elements
More informationCHAPTER 8. Mrs. Zimman s Class - Central Elementary
SUSTAINABILITY CHAPTER 8 Mrs. Zimman s Class - Central Elementary 8.1 OVERVIEW Green infrastructure also known as low impact development (LID) and environmental or sustainable site design is an environmentally
More informationVEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
This perspective sketch communicates the intended character and quality of a proposed streetscape design. Locate benches near a major intersection where people tend to gather. Seating and lighting provide
More informationSuccessful Green Infrastructure Planning: A Micro-Scale Modeling and Field Investigation Approach
Successful Green Infrastructure Planning: A Micro-Scale Modeling and Field Investigation Approach Hazem Gheith and Vinnie Treatment, Water Division, ARCADIS-US Hunter Kelly, Department of Sewage and Drainage,
More informationCleveland Park Streetscape and Drainage Improvement Project 1
Cleveland Park Streetscape and Drainage Improvement Project 1 Urban Context Washington, D.C. Connecticut Avenue Cleveland Park Streetscape and Drainage Improvement Project 2 Neighborhood Context Contributing
More informationBASMAA Development Committee. Guidance for Identifying Green Infrastructure Potential in Municipal Capital Improvement Program Projects May 6, 2016
Background BASMAA Development Committee Guidance for Identifying Green Infrastructure Potential in Municipal Capital Improvement Program s May 6, 2016 In the recently reissued Municipal Regional Stormwater
More informationOctober 7, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report
October 7, 2016 City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7295 RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report As per your request, we are submitting to you the drainage report and
More informationMain Street Reconstruction From Ninth Line to Stouffer Street. Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville. Public Information Centre
Main Street Reconstruction From Ninth Line to Stouffer Street Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Public Information Centre November 23, 2016 4:30 to 6:00 pm & 7:00 to 8:00 pm 6240 Main Street, Stouffville
More informationCan Urban Redevelopment Restore Aquatic Resources
Can Urban Redevelopment Restore Aquatic Resources with Standards for Stormwater Retention and Landscape Performance? Rebecca C. Stack District of Columbia Department of the Environment Industry, Agriculture,
More informationunderstanding Green Infrastructure In Zoning
understanding Green Infrastructure In Zoning Purpose Measurable standards can be adopted within municipal zoning codes, and subdivision and stormwater regulations, to promote a comprehensive approach to
More informationConcept Plan Report: Lafayette Neighborhood RiverSmart Low Impact Development and Green Infrastructure Development Project.
Concept Plan Report: Lafayette Neighborhood RiverSmart Low Impact Development and Green Infrastructure Development Project December 6, 2011 Prepared By: Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary... 1 2 Background...
More informationSCVURPPP Green Infrastructure Handbook. Kristin Kerr, P.E. EOA, Inc. April 19, 2017
SCVURPPP Green Infrastructure Handbook Kristin Kerr, P.E. EOA, Inc. April 19, 2017 Outline of Presentation Overview Handbook Contents Schedule Overview MRP requires GI Plans to include general guidelines,
More informationPage 19 L.L.C. (Previously the United Salad Co. Garage) 939 SE Alder St.
Page 19 L.L.C. (Previously the United Salad Co. Garage) 939 SE Alder St. Project Summary Project Type: Technologies: Major Benefits: Light industrial retrofit (parking lot) - demonstration project Landscape
More informationDraft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for West New York, Hudson County, New Jersey
Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for West New York, Hudson County, New Jersey Prepared for the Town of West New York by the Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program March 29, 2017
More informationGreen Infrastructure in the Greater Lansing Area
Green Infrastructure in the Greater Lansing Area Friday May 9, 2014 David Christian, PE DC Engineering Lansing, MI Dan Christian, PE Tetra Tech Lansing, MI 1 2 Edgewood Village Center Cedar St School Harvesting
More informationConstruction and Landscaping on Public Property
Construction and Landscaping on Public Property City of Manhattan Beach Community Development Department 1400 Highland Avenue 310-802-5504 www.citymb.info January, 2004 Construction and Landscaping on
More informationCHAPTER 11 SITE DESIGN AND LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER 11 SITE DESIGN AND LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT Source: City of Bend Chapter Organization 11.1 Purpose... 11-1 11.2 Applicability... 11-1 11.3 Low Impact Development Overview... 11-2 11.3.1 Key Strategies...
More informationGUIDELINES FOR PERMEABLE SIDEWALK-LANDSCAPING PERMIT
GUIDELINES FOR PERMEABLE SIDEWALK-LANDSCAPING PERMIT Green spaces are vital to San Francisco s quality of life as they provide a range of environmental benefits and bring beauty to our neighborhoods and
More informationCity of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004
City of Farmington Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004 Introduction Planning Background 1 Scope and Components of the Plan Amendment 2 Concept Introduction 3 Plan Concepts 3 Conceptual
More informationKINGSTON LID STORMWATER RETROFIT
KINGSTON LID STORMWATER RETROFIT LID RETROFIT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for: Kitsap County Public Works Surface and Stormwater Management (SSWM) 614 Division Street (MS 26A) Port Orchard, WA 98366 December,
More informationCITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA (360) (360) (FAX)
CITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA 98501 (360) 754-4180 (360) 754-4126 (FAX) Email: cdd@ci.tumwater.wa.us APPENDIX II-C SHORT FORM CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)
More informationwater that enters our streams during storms. Any water the rain garden can t accept will continue into the storm sewer system.
North Kensington Street and 32 nd Street North Green Street and Sewer Capacity Meeting Friday, July 20 and Monday, July 23, 2012 Summary of Citizen Questions and Concerns Thank you for participating in
More informationImpervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for City of Vineland, Cumberland County, New Jersey
Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for City of Vineland, Cumberland County, New Jersey Prepared for the City of Vineland by the Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program May 23, 2016 Table
More informationAn Integrated Green Infrastructure Plan to Address Combined Sewer Overflow, Stormwater and Nutrient Reductions in Lancaster City, PA
An Integrated Green Infrastructure Plan to Address Combined Sewer Overflow, Stormwater and Nutrient Reductions in Lancaster City, PA Charlotte Katzenmoyer American Public Works Association Sustainability
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Public Hearing Item FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BAUER FARM; XPRESS WELLNESS URGENT CARE; 4700 OVERLAND DR (MKM)
PC Staff Report 06/22/15 FDP-15-00108 Item No. 6-1 PC Staff Report 06/22/2015 ITEM NO. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Public Hearing Item FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BAUER FARM; XPRESS WELLNESS URGENT CARE;
More information6.1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Chapter 6: Stormwater Management 6.1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been prepared for the Proposed Project in accordance with the requirements
More informationDraft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for West Long Branch Borough, Monmouth County, New Jersey
Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for West Long Branch Borough, Monmouth County, New Jersey Prepared for West Long Branch Borough by the Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program
More informationWATERSHED RESTORATION PLAN
WHITTEN BROOK WATERSHED RESTORATION PLAN Appendices March 2011 Skowhegan Conservation Commission 1 APPENDICES Appendix 1. Watershed Maps...49 Map 1. Topography...49 Map 2. Soils...50 Map 3. Soil Erodibility...51
More informationLow Impact Development Site Design
Chapter 4 Low Impact Development Site Design In this Chapter: How site design measures can reduce stormwater treatment measure size Tree preservation and planting Self-treating and self-retaining areas
More informationCITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT. MEMORANDUM To: From:
CITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Date: Planning Board Juliet T.H. Walker, Planning Director Jillian Harris, Planner 1 Staff Recommendations for the August 23, 2018 Planning
More informationSITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST PROJECT SUMMARY: Project Name: City/ETA Location: City ETA (Application fee & number of copies needed are based on location) Property Location (Legal Description
More informationReconstruction Project. Wayzata Task Force Meeting September 3, 2009
CSAH 101 Reconstruction Project Wayzata Task Force Meeting September 3, 2009 Agenda 700 7:00 Re-Introductions ti 7:05 2008 Activity Recap / 2009 Activities-to-date 7:10 Discussion of Layout Revisions (per
More information6.2 Flow-Through Planter
SAN MATEO COUNTYWIDE WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM 6.2 Flow-Through Planter Figure 6-8: At-grade flow-through planter. Source: City of Emeryville Best uses Treating roof runoff Next to buildings Dense
More informationGREEN ON THE HORIZON. Challenges of Integrating LID into New Development. Southeast Stormwater Association
GREEN ON THE HORIZON Challenges of Integrating LID into New Development Southeast Stormwater Association Annual Seminar, Charleston SC October 9, 2014 JENNIFER A. NUNN, PE THE BALMORAL GROUP Acknowledgments
More informationSUPPORTING DOCUMENT STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE
SUPPORTING DOCUMENT STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE Please complete this narrative form and submit with your SWPPP drawings. Refer to Kitsap County Stormwater Design Manual Vol.
More informationRetrofit of the Gwinnett County DWR Facility Using Low Impact Development Practices SESWA 2012 Annual Conference October 19, 2012
Retrofit of the Gwinnett County DWR Facility Using Low Impact Development Practices SESWA 2012 Annual Conference October 19, 2012 Jeff Herr, P.E., D.WRE National Stormwater Leader jherr@brwncald.com Acknowledgements
More information