Silverlakes Equestrian Sports Park Draft Environmental Impact Report
|
|
- Linette Stafford
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Silverlakes Equestrian Sports Park Draft Environmental Impact Report Aesthetics Aesthetics Introduction This section describes the existing aesthetic setting and potential effects from project implementation on the site and its surrounding area. Aesthetics, as addressed in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), refers to visual impacts or adverse changes, including scenic resources, scenic vistas, changes in visual character, and lighting or glare. Aesthetics analysis (or visual resource analysis) is a process that logically assesses visible change and anticipates viewer response to change Existing Conditions The Proposed Project site is located in the northern portion of the City of Norco, at the south end of the Chino Basin. From the project area, the Santa Ana Mountains and Cleveland National Forest are visible to the south, and the San Gabriel Mountains and the San Bernardino Mountains are visible to the north and northeast, respectively. The Chino Hills are also visible to the west and southwest, depending on the viewer s specific location. A bluff approximately feet in height is located along the south side of the Santa Ana River south of the site, which provides views of the Project site and surrounding lands to the northeast, north, and northwest; an additional bluff is located along the northern boundary and provides views of the Project site. The tallest vantage point in the general vicinity of the Project site is a knoll about 989 feet in elevation located approximately 1.1 mile south of the site (southwest of Sixth Street and Hamner Avenue). The Silverlakes site is visible from surrounding residences to the west, north, and south-southwest along the Santa Ana River bluff that faces south. Scenic Vistas The Proposed Project area is predominantly flat and near the Santa Ana River. The Santa Ana River, which generally serves as the southeastern and southern boundary of the Proposed Project site, is the area's most prominent natural feature with its large, lush riparian habitat area. Located along the eastern and southern boundary of the Proposed Project, the Santa Ana River represents a significant watershed, recreational, habitat and visual resource. This portion of the river is just upriver from the Prado Basin, a habitat area of statewide significance. The massive 2,650-square mile Santa Ana River Watershed is the focus of extensive habitat conservation and restoration efforts by state and federal government agencies. While the Prado Basin itself is not immediately visible from the Project site, the Santa Ana River runs immediately south of the site and is visible from east to southwest as it flows toward the Prado Basin. Several mountain ranges are visible from the Project area, including the San Gabriel Mountains to the north, the San Bernardino Mountains to the northeast, and the Chino Hills to the west. These views are also visible from the I-15 Freeway, which is adjacent to the Project site to the east. The Project site is briefly visible to travelers going north on the I-15 Freeway, but visible for a longer period (with an easier angle of the view) to travelers heading south on the freeway. At normal freeway speed, the Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client\3399-City of Norco\ _Sec04-01 Aesthetics.doc
2 Aesthetics Silverlakes Equestrian Sports Park Draft Environmental Impact Report Project site would be visible for about ten seconds, with longer visibility occurring during rush hour traffic. There is an improved flood control drainage channel that runs along the east side of the Project site between the site and the freeway, which does not provide any scenic resources since it is fully improved (i.e., concrete-lined) along the length of the site. The Proposed Project area and the surrounding Norco area are historically known for agriculture, especially the many dairies that previously covered the nearby Chino Basin to the west and north. The dairies have been slowly relocating for ten years or more, and been slowly replaced by suburban development, mainly housing. This portion of western Riverside County is known as the Eastvale area and has experienced considerable growth in the last ten years. Scenic Resources The project site is not currently within a designated scenic corridor, nor is it considered a scenic resource. However, the site does have substantial views of regional mountains, the Santa Ana River and its southern bluff, and nearby agricultural fields. At present, there are no facilities within the Project area eligible for designation as a scenic route under the California Scenic Highway Program (i.e. the I-15 Freeway or state highways). Visual Character Views from the project site are very important, and in a way represent a visually significant community resource. The Proposed Project site is visible to residential housing along the entire north and northwest border of the site as well as south and southeast of the site. At present, the current views of the project site are either disturbed vacant land or views of multiple trees, with few structures, none of which are considered historic. Exhibit 4.1-1through 4.1-2e shows various views from the project site. Light or Glare Light sources are defined by their output rating in lumens. The lumen is the most common measure of light output. As lamps and fixtures age, become weathered and deteriorate, their lumen output decreases. Illuminance, or the amount of light transmitted upon a certain area, is measured in terms of foot-candles (which is equal to one lumen per square foot). The higher the foot-candle level, the brighter the illuminated area. There are two different forms of glare, discomfort glare and disability glare. Discomfort glare is psychological in nature and typically causes eye aversion. Disability glare reduces visual ability and results in reduced visual performance and visibility. Both discomfort glare and disability glare can be potentially dangerous. Analysis of potential light and glare impacts considers the following: Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client\3399-City of Norco\ _Sec04-01 Aesthetics.doc
3 Silverlakes Equestrian Sports Park Draft Environmental Impact Report Aesthetics Artificial Sky Glow: The brightening of the night sky attributable to human-created sources of light. Light Pollution: Light pollution is the upward and outward distribution of light. The light is emitted either directly from fixtures or from reflection off the ground or other surfaces. Glare: Light that causes visual discomfort or disability, or a loss of visual performance. Spill Light: Light from an installation that falls outside of the boundaries of the property on which the installation is sited. Light Trespass: Spill light that because of quantitative, directional, or type of light causes annoyance, discomfort, or loss in visual performance and visibility. Luminaire (light fixture): A complete lighting unit consisting of one or more electric lamps, the lamp holder, reflector, lens, diffuser, ballast, and/or other components, and accessories. Shielding: - Fully shielded - A luminaire emitting no light above the horizontal plan. - Shielded - A luminaire emitting less than 2 percent of its light above the horizontal plane. - Partly shielded - A luminaire emitting less than 10 percent of its light above the horizontal plane. - Unshielded - A luminaire emitting light in any direction. Luminance: The amount of light emitted in a given direction from a surface by the light source or by reflection from a surface. Luminance is measured in candela per square meter. The neighborhoods bordering the Project site to the west and north contain urban intensity residential uses, which produce moderate levels of light (e.g., streetlights, interior and security lights on buildings, nearby shopping centers, etc.). The homes fronting on the Project site are mainly two story buildings that have glass windows, which have the potential to produce glare. The perimeter roads and Hamner Avenue have streetlights, which allow for vehicular and pedestrian movement in and around the Proposed Project area. In general, nighttime light levels in the area are typical of suburban areas given its urban setting and grid system of lighted roads. Light levels within the Proposed Project site are much lower than surrounding areas due to its large amount of open space (i.e., weedy vacant land), as well as dilapidated structures and landscaping which are not lighted to urban levels. Various views of the site and surrounding area are provided in Exhibit 4.1-2, Site Photographs, while Exhibit 3-2, Project Aerial Photo, provides an aerial photograph of the Project site and surrounding area. Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client\3399-City of Norco\ _Sec04-01 Aesthetics.doc
4
5 Schleisman Road!5 (!4 (!6 (!7 ( (3!2! (!1 (!8 ( 7th Street (! 1 Photo Location Project Boundary NORTH Source: Google Earth Pro. 1, Michael Brandman Associates / _Photo_Index.mxd 0 1,000 Feet Exhibit Photo Index Map CITY OF NORCO SILVERLAKES EQUESTRIAN SPORTS PARK ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
6
7 Photograph 1: Looking east from the project site at the drainage channel. Photograph 2: Looking southeast from the project site at dried lake bed. Source: Michael Brandman Associates, Michael Brandman Associates /2008 Site_Photos_a.mxd Exhibit 4.1-2a Site Photographs 1 and 2 CITY OF NORCO SILVERLAKES EQUESTRIAN SPORTS PARK ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
8
9 Photograph 3: Looking northeast from the project site at the main building. Photograph 4: Looking northeast from the project site at residential development. Source: Michael Brandman Associates, Michael Brandman Associates /2008 Site_Photos_3&4.mxd Exhibit 4.1-2b Site Photographs 3 and 4 CITY OF NORCO SILVERLAKES EQUESTRIAN SPORTS PARK ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
10
11 Photograph 5: Looking south from the project site at the surrounding hills. Photograph 6: Looking south from the project site. Source: Michael Brandman Associates, Michael Brandman Associates /2008 Site_Photos_5&6.mxd Exhibit 4.1-2c Site Photographs 5 and 6 CITY OF NORCO SILVERLAKES EQUESTRIAN SPORTS PARK ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
12
13 Photograph 7: Looking southwest from the project site at the residential development. Photograph 8: Looking south from the project site at private farm Source: Michael Brandman Associates, Michael Brandman Associates /2008 Site_Photos_7&8.mxd Exhibit 4.1-2d Site Photographs 7 and 8 CITY OF NORCO SILVERLAKES EQUESTRIAN SPORTS PARK ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
14
15 Photograph 9: Looking northeast at the project site from the nearby hill. NORTH Source: MBA 2008 Michael Brandman Associates /2008 _Site Photograph 9.mxd Exhibit 4.1-2e Site Photograph 9 CITY OF NORCO SILVERLAKES EQUESTRIAN SPORTS PARK ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
16
17 Silverlakes Equestrian Sports Park Draft Environmental Impact Report Aesthetics Regulatory Framework State The State Scenic Highway System is a list of highways, consists of mainly state highways that have been designated by the Caltrans as scenic highways. The California State Legislature, primarily through Section 263 of the Streets and Highways Code, makes highways eligible for designation as a scenic highway. Currently the Proposed Project site is not located next to a State Scenic Highway. City of Norco General Plan The City of Norco General Plan does not address the potential and existing scenic routes in the City s study area Thresholds of Significance According to the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Environmental Checklist, to determine whether impacts to aesthetic resources are significant environmental effects, the following questions are analyzed and evaluated: a.) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b.) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c.) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d.) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Project Impact Analysis and Mitigation Measures This section discusses potential aesthetic resources impacts associated with the development of the project. Mitigation measures are provided where appropriate. Scenic Vistas Impact AES-1 Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? [CEQA Aesthetic Threshold 1(a)] Impact Analysis Development of the Proposed Project will change direct views of the site. Although the site contains features that could be considered visually pleasing (i.e. trees and vegetated open space), it is not identified as a scenic vista, nor does it contain unique features (e.g., rock outcroppings) other than the Santa Ana River to the east and south. Additionally, the Proposed Project is located in an area of diverse land uses, such as residential located immediately to the north and west, a public facility (the I-15 Freeway) directly to the east, and open space directly to the east of the project site. Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client\3399-City of Norco\ _Sec04-01 Aesthetics.doc
18 Aesthetics Silverlakes Equestrian Sports Park Draft Environmental Impact Report The Proposed Project would introduce a number of recreational facilities onto the site, including equestrian turf sports fields, horse rinks, trails, a lake, etc. While these represent improved uses, they will create a generally soft appearance to the site relative to suburban type land uses (e.g., residences, shopping centers). Views from the residential units immediately west of the site, across Hamner Avenue, and immediately north of the site, east of Hamner Avenue (e.g., Kern River Drive, etc.), will have the most direct changes to views. The present view is of a vacant and weedy property. With the introduction of sports fields, equestrian facility s, landscaping, signage, etc., this view will change dramatically. During events at the Proposed site, more traffic will also be visible along Hamner Avenue. Although further from the site where areas are at a higher elevation than the Project site, residents in the homes along the south bluff of the Santa Ana River, both west of Hamner Avenue (e.g., Pali Road, etc.) and east of Hamner Avenue (e.g., Old Hamner Road, River Drive, etc.) may have more extensive daytime views of the Proposed Project site where views are not obstructed by landscaping or buildings. For an analysis of nighttime views related to lighting, see Section AES-4. While the appearance of the site will fundamentally change, the changes are not necessarily considered significantly adverse due to the nature and appearance of the planned facilities. The site is currently planned and zoned for park/open space use, and signs have been placed on the site in the past to acknowledge future use (S. King, personal communication, July 2008). The proposed recreational facilities would be consistent with the long-term planned use (and appearance) of the site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have less than significant impacts on scenic vistas. The Proposed Project will eventually include an electronic message sign along the I-15 Freeway near the northeast corner of the Project site. In addition, the County will eventually be constructing a new freeway interchange for the realignment and extension of Schliesman Road just north of the Project site. These improvements will affect the visual character of the northeastern portion of the site and areas offsite to the north and east, because the freeway is the dominant visual characteristic of this area, and the freeway interchange has been planed for a number of years. Therefore, these changes are not expected to be significantly adverse relative to scenic vistas. Level of Significance Before Mitigation Less than significant impact. Mitigation Measures No mitigation is required. Level of Significance After Mitigation Less than significant impact Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client\3399-City of Norco\ _Sec04-01 Aesthetics.doc
19 Silverlakes Equestrian Sports Park Draft Environmental Impact Report Aesthetics Scenic Resources Impact AES -2 Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic building within a state scenic highway? [CEQA Aesthetic Threshold 1(b).] Impact Analysis Current views of the site are either disturbed vacant land or stands of trees with few structures, none of which are considered historic. The project will remove existing dilapidated structures (except for the existing ranch house), and create a recreational complex in a mixed use area dominated by rural residential lots and open space. The Proposed Project will maintain as many of the mature and healthy trees as possible. No existing structures or facilities on the site are eligible for designation as a scenic resource. The Project is not located near an Official State Scenic Highway. The nearest eligible State Scenic Highway is approximately five (5) miles west of State Highway 91 and five (5) miles south of the I- 15 Freeway. Therefore, the Proposed Project will not have an impact on an official State Scenic Highway. In addition, the Project proposes to construct an electronic message sign approximately 150 feet from the I-15 Freeway. The section of the I-15 Freeway that is adjacent to the Proposed Project is designated as a State Landscaped Freeway. According to Caltrans, a Classified State Landscaped Freeway is a section of freeway with landscaping that meets the criteria of its outdoor advertising regulations. Regulations are used to control the use of outdoor advertising displays. However, the Proposed Project is not subject to regulations under the State Landscape Freeway (Byron Strout (Caltrans), September 30, 2008). Therefore, the Project will have a less than significant impact in this regard. Level of Significance Before Mitigation Less than significant impact. Mitigation Measures No mitigation is required. Level of Significance After Mitigation Less than significant impact. Visual Character Impact AES-3 Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? [CEQA Aesthetic Threshold 1(c)] Impact Analysis Current views of the site are of disturbed, vacant land, dilapidated structures, etc., which are not considered particularly aesthetic or attractive other than the overall impression of open space. Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client\3399-City of Norco\ _Sec04-01 Aesthetics.doc
20 Aesthetics Silverlakes Equestrian Sports Park Draft Environmental Impact Report Implementation of the Proposed Project will convert the site to a recreational complex, and views onto and from the site will change substantially. The project will remove existing dilapidated structures while maintaining as many of the mature and healthy trees as possible, and install various recreational facilities (e.g., sports fields, equestrian rings, etc.) in an area dominated by rural residential and open space (other than views of the freeway to the east). Construction of the project will create short-term impacts in the form of isolated views of the site from heavy construction equipment and machinery preparing the land (i.e. grading), and eventually the construction of the recreational complex. Alteration of the landscape by grading and clearing will change the existing topography into a series of pads intended for recreational uses. Dust could also obscure or interfere with views of the area during grading, although fugitive dust will settle and disperse quickly after the end of construction. However, water trucks will traverse the site throughout the day to minimize fugitive dust. Furthermore, the Proposed Project will be consistent with the current planned use (parkland) and zoning (open space) of the property. While the Project represents a fundamental change in views, this change is not considered adverse or a substantial degradation due to the anticipated appearance of the improvements (i.e. turf athletic fields, equestrian rings, stable buildings, RV camping, etc.). These types of facilities are consistent with Norco s image and culture of equestrian and rural agricultural use. Therefore, the aesthetic impacts of the Proposed Project on the visual character of the area are expected to be less than significant. For a discussion of lighting impacts and landscaping mitigation, see Section AES-4. Level of Significance Before Mitigation Less than significant impact. Mitigation Measures No mitigation is needed. Level of Significance After Mitigation Less than significant impact. Light or Glare Impact AES-4 Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [CEQA Aesthetic Threshold 1(d)] Impact Analysis Removal of dilapidated structures and dump piles from the site, and replacing them with the proposed recreational complex could be considered a positive impact. However, these uses will change views of the area and introduce new sources of light and glare. The proposed recreational complex would result in a new light source for the area during night hours. Lighting for the fields, and outdoor uses Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client\3399-City of Norco\ _Sec04-01 Aesthetics.doc
21 Silverlakes Equestrian Sports Park Draft Environmental Impact Report Aesthetics would be necessary to illuminate the evening and night skies. The project will produce long-term aesthetic impacts on the site that will substantially change the visual and aesthetic character of the area, transforming the existing terrain into a recreational complex. However, any development project, even if it were more rural in design, would change the views of the site, and add substantial new sources of light and glare. This lighting is a potential source of glare and sky glow if not properly designed, especially given that much of it will be portable to be able to light different activity areas depending on the planned activity (e.g., night soccer tournament, night equestrian show, community carnival, etc.). In addition, the Project proposes to construct an electronic message sign oriented towards the I-15 Freeway in the northeast portion of the site. It should be noted that the City staff and the project planning team discussed this issue at length, and modified the land plan to preclude lighting the five (5) soccer fields at the north end of the site (designated Fields 24 to 28 in Exhibit 3-4b). However, based on the planned use of a portable lighting system and the current low ambient lighting levels, it is reasonable to conclude that potential lighting impacts of the Proposed Project are potentially significant. Level of Significance Before Mitigation Potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures MM AES-4a MM AES-4b The Project developer shall develop a Lighting Management Plan (LMP) for approval of the City to minimize light intrusion into neighborhoods to the west and north of the Project site. A major restriction to be incorporated into the LMP will be to preclude or at least minimize any lights directed to the west or north anywhere on the site. Any lights oriented in those directions shall be elevated and directed down to the greatest extent feasible to minimize visual hot spots or glare during nighttime events. The LMP will include City contact numbers for local residents to contact City officials if lighting systems do not comply with the restrictions outlined in the LMP. Failure of users/uses to adhere to the requirements of the LMP will be cause for revocation of their use permit(s) and/or cancellation of their event. All event lighting (i.e. exclusive of building and/or walkway security lighting) shall be the highest state of the art equipment in terms of light cutoff and control (i.e. tunable ). The operator of the facility shall strive to install and locate lighting to minimize spillover onto existing residential areas to the greatest extent feasible. MM AES-4c The Project site plan will be modified to indicate, and the Lighting Management Plan (LMP - see MM AES-4a) will preclude lighting Fields #1 and #3. This will reduce potential lighting impacts to residences immediately across Hamner Avenue. In this Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client\3399-City of Norco\ _Sec04-01 Aesthetics.doc
22 Aesthetics Silverlakes Equestrian Sports Park Draft Environmental Impact Report area, only Fields #2 and #4 may be lighted. Fields #5 through #11 may be lighted since they are not adjacent to existing residences along Hamner Avenue. MM AES-4d As part of the Project landscaping plan, the City shall provide massed plantings of trees of various types along the west and north boundaries of the site, exclusive of the existing nursery site, to help reduce potential spillover of light and soften views onto the site from adjacent residential areas. Level of Significance After Mitigation Less than significant impact Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client\3399-City of Norco\ _Sec04-01 Aesthetics.doc
23 Silverlakes Equestrian Sports Park Draft Environmental Impact Report Aesthetics Authors: The table of contents below is for authors and editors to use. To refresh, place your cursor in the table of contents area and press F Aesthetics Introduction Existing Conditions Regulatory Framework Thresholds of Significance Project Impact Analysis and Mitigation Measures Error! No table of figures entries found. Exhibit 4.1-1: Photo Index Map Exhibit 4.1-2a: Site Photographs Exhibit 4.1-2b: Site Photographs Exhibit 4.1-2c: Site Photographs Exhibit 4.1-2d: Site Photographs Exhibit 4.1-2e: Site Photographs Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client\3399-City of Norco\ _Sec04-01 Aesthetics.doc
24 Aesthetics Silverlakes Equestrian Sports Park Draft Environmental Impact Report Bibliography: Please record your references as you draft your section. Author's Name. Year. Report Title. Author's Name. Year. Report Title. Author's Name. Year. Report Title. Author's Name. Year. Report Title. General Instructions We use an author date system within the narrative of the text and a similar format for recording the entry in the references. Web resources In the narrative: (Delano Union School District 2006) In the bibliography: Website name. Year. The web address you visited. The date you accessed the site. For example: Delano Union School District Website Accessed April 23, Personal communications In the narrative: (Sayers, pers. comm.) In the bibliography: Contact s last name, first name. Title, firm or company. Personal communication: form of pers comm ( , telephone, fax, etc.). Date of communication. For example: Sayers, Dorothy. Managing Editor, Bloomsbury Industries. Personal communication: . April 23, Reports in the narrative: (A J Environmental, Inc. 2005) In the bibliography: Firm s name as author; if person, last name, initials only. Year published. Title of Report. Month day published (if known.) For example: A J Environmental, Inc City of Bakersfield Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Bakersfield OHV Park, Kern County, California, August Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client\3399-City of Norco\ _Sec04-01 Aesthetics.doc
Nob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project EIR
Section 3.1 Aesthetics This section addresses the visual aspects that may affect the views experienced by the public, including the potential to impact the existing character of each area that comprises
More information5. Environmental Analysis
5.1 This section of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) describes the existing landform and aesthetic character of the project area and discusses the potential impacts to the visual character
More information3.1 AESTHETICS Background and Methodology
3.1 AESTHETICS 3.1.1 Background and Methodology 3.1.1.1 Regulatory Context The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that project sponsors evaluate the project s potential to cause aesthetic
More information3.1 Aesthetics, Light, and Glare
3.1 3.1.1 Introduction This section describes the existing aesthetics, light, and glare setting and potential effects from project implementation on visual resources and the site and its surroundings.
More information4.1 AESTHETICS WATSON INDUSTRIAL PARK ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXISTING CONDITIONS
This Subsection describes the aesthetic qualities and visual resources present on the Project site and in the site s vicinity and evaluates the potential effects that the Project may have on these resources.
More information5.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES Physical Setting
5.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES 5.1.1 Physical Setting Aesthetic values are an important aspect in establishing the identity, sense of place, and quality of life in a community. Natural features in
More informationCHAPTER 10 AESTHETICS
CHAPTER 10 AESTHETICS CHAPTER 10 AESTHETICS This section identifies and evaluates key visual resources in the project area to determine the degree of visual impact that would be attributable to the project.
More information4.1 AESTHETICS EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ALAMITOS BAY MARINA REHABILITATION PROJECT CITY OF LONG BEACH
4.1 AESTHETICS This section provides a discussion of the existing visual and aesthetic resources on site and in the surrounding area as well as an analysis of potential impacts from implementation of the
More information5.11 AESTHETICS ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
5.11 AESTHETICS ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The lies on a relatively flat valley floor surrounded by rugged hills and mountains. The topography of the planning area is defined by the Box Springs Mountains and
More informationEnvironmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures
CHAPTER 3 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures Format of the Environmental Analysis The assessment of each environmental resource discussed in this chapter includes the following: Environmental
More informationSECTION 5.1 Aesthetics, Light, and Glare
SECTION 5.1 Aesthetics, Light, and Glare 5.1 AESTHETICS, LIGHT, AND GLARE Visual resources information for this section was compiled from photographs and site surveys conducted by RBF Consulting. The purpose
More information1. INTRODUCTION. a. Light. b. Glare
IV.A.2 LIGHT & GLARE 1. INTRODUCTION This section describes the existing sources of nighttime illumination and glare on the Project site and in the surrounding area and evaluates potential changes resulting
More informationSection 3.16 Visual Quality
Chapter 3 Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Mitigation Measures Section 3.16 Visual Quality Introduction This section discusses existing conditions, effects and mitigation measures
More information5. Environmental Analysis
5.1 This section of the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (Draft PEIR) discusses the potential impacts to the visual character of the plan area associated with the proposed project. This section
More information3.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES
3.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES This section examines the potential for the proposed Project to create aesthetic and visual impacts as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as
More informationThe impacts examined herein take into account two attributes of aesthetic values:
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS This section addresses the potential impacts to views and aesthetics as a result of the proposed Project at the Project Site and the development scenarios analyzed for
More informationPD-32: Light Pollution
: Light Pollution Goal: To safely illuminate roadways while minimizing unnecessary and potentially harmful illumination of the surrounding sky, communities, and habitat. 1-3 points Sustainability Linkage
More information4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY
SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY This section evaluates the potential impacts to aesthetics and visual quality. Aesthetics refers to visual resources and the quality of what can
More informationENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS This section addresses the potential impacts to aesthetics and views that could result from the proposed project, including development of the Add Area,
More information3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.
This section of the Draft EIR addresses the existing land uses on and adjacent to the project site and discusses the potential impacts of the proposed project on existing land uses. Key issues addressed
More informationCalifornia Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Scenic Highway Program
3.1. AESTHETICS This section is an assessment of the potential for the Proposed Project to create construction and/or operational aesthetic impacts. This assessment includes a summary of the regulatory
More informationAESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES 3.1
AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES 3.1 This section provides an overview of the visual character, scenic resources, views, scenic highways, and sources of light and glare that are encountered on the project
More information-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION II OF TITLE 20--COASTAL ZONING CODE
CHAPTER 20.504 VISUAL RESOURCE AND SPECIAL TREATMENT AREAS Sec. 20.504.005 Applicability. Sec. 20.504.010 Purpose. Sec. 20.504.015 Highly Scenic Areas. Sec. 20.504.020 Special Communities and Neighborhoods.
More information5.1 AESTHETICS, LIGHT, AND GLARE
This section describes the existing aesthetic resources in the Project area and discusses potential impacts associated with implementation of the proposed Project. The analysis focuses on the anticipated
More information4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES The following sections discuss the impacts associated with environmental resources for the tunneling method Alternatives A and B. The construction
More informationIntroduction Environmental Setting. Visual Character. Surrounding Land Uses. Regional Setting. Project Site
Contra Costa County Tassajara Parks Project Recirculated Draft EIR Aesthetics, Light, and Glare 3.1 - Aesthetics, Light, and Glare 3.1.1 - Introduction This section describes the existing aesthetics, light,
More informationURBAN DESIGN GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES
URBAN DESIGN GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES GOALS / POLICIES Authority Consideration of urban design issues in the general plan is provided under the Land Use Element requirements which direct attention to
More informationVisual and Aesthetics
Such a connection could accommodate timed transfers and improve connections between local transit service and Presidio Shuttle service. Level of Service The results of the analysis are provided on a route-by-route
More information3.5 VISUAL AND AESTHETIC QUALITIES
3.5 VISUAL AND AESTHETIC QUALITIES 3.5.1 Introduction to Analysis 3.5.1.1 Summary of Results The Preferred Alternative would represent a minimal change to the visual character of the existing rail corridor.
More informationVisual Impact Assessment 830 Pratt Avenue St Helena, CA
Visual Impact Assessment 830 Pratt Avenue St Helena, CA 1. Introduction The following aesthetic visual impact assessment has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The
More information3A. Aesthetics. 3A.1 Environmental Setting. Regional Character. Project Site
The purpose of this section is to identify and evaluate key visual resources in the project area from public viewpoints, and to determine the degree of visual impacts that could occur if the proposed project
More information3.2 AESTHETICS/VISUAL QUALITY
3.2 AESTHETICS/VISUAL QUALITY This section evaluates the potential impacts of the proposed project on the existing visual conditions within MTRP. Design features proposed to reduce or avoid adverse effects
More information6.8 SCENIC HIGHWAYS Introduction
6.8 SCENIC HIGHWAYS 6.8.1 Introduction The Scenic Highways Element is an optional General Plan element authorized by Section 65303 of the Government Code. The Scenic Highways Element is intended to establish
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. VIEWS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. VIEWS ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Existing Visual Character Project Site The project site is located at 10250 Wilshire Boulevard in the Westwood community of
More informationIV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES
IV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Existing Visual Character Project Site The project site is located at 17331-17333 Tramonto Drive in the Pacific Palisades community of the City of Los Angeles
More informationCalifornia Department of Transportation, California Scenic Highway Program; Placer Vineyards Specific Plan EIR prepared by Placer County;
3.1 AESTHETICS 3.1.1 INTRODUCTION This section describes the visual character of the project site and views from surrounding public areas. This section also evaluates the change to visual resources in
More information4.1 AESTHETICS. A. Regulatory Framework
4.1 This section includes a description of the existing visual setting of the project site and an analysis of the effects the proposed project would have on aesthetics in the project vicinity. Aesthetics
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS INTRODUCTION This section evaluates the potential impacts of the Proposed Project on aesthetics, views and vistas, light and glare, and shade and shadows
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. SHADE/SHADOW
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. SHADE/SHADOW ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The issue of shade and shadow pertains to the blockage of direct sunlight by onsite buildings, which affect adjacent
More information6.1 Aesthetics Introduction
SECTION 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 6.1 Aesthetics 6.1.1 Introduction The aesthetic quality of the proposed Project is determined by its visual character, consisting of elements such as natural and man-made
More informationThere are no federal programs or policies addressing visual resources that pertain to the 2018 LRDP.
3.1 AESTHETICS This section describes the existing visual characteristics of the plan area and evaluates the potential of the 2018 LRDP to result in substantial adverse visual impacts. The visual impact
More information4.9 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
4.9 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES 4.9 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Abstract This Section identifies and addresses potential impacts to agricultural resources that may result from implementation of the proposed development.
More information3. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES
3. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES Organization of this Chapter This chapter presents the environmental setting of the project for the various impact categories, and then evaluates
More informationThis section describes the existing conditions in the project area and identifies the resources that could be affected by the project.
4.4 VISUAL RESOURCES The following analysis identifies changes in the visual environment experienced by existing offsite viewers with exposure to the site of the Mitchell Farms Subdivision (project). In
More information3.1 AESTHETICS ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING VISUAL CHARACTER OF THE PROJECT SITE VISUAL CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA
3.1 AESTHETICS Aesthetic or visual resources are the natural and human-built features of the landscape that contribute to the public s appreciation and enjoyment of the aesthetic environment. This section
More information5.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES
5.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES This section describes the existing visual environment in and around the project area. The analysis assesses the potential for aesthetics/light and glare impacts using
More informationBIRMINGHAM TOWNSHIP CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance No Dated 02/18/03
BIRMINGHAM TOWNSHIP CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance No. 0302 Dated 02/18/03 Section 103-40. OUTDOOR LIGHTING A. Purpose. The standards in this section shall require
More informationTHE PLANNING AREA 2.1 PLANNING AREA LOCATION
2. The Planning Area Brisbane Baylands Specific Plan 21 2 THE PLANNING AREA 2.1 PLANNING AREA LOCATION The Baylands is located approximately midway between San Francisco s central business district and
More informationLighting Guidelines. Planning Services Department Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington
Lighting Guidelines Planning Services Department Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington APPROVED BY COUNCIL ON MARCH 22, 2010 PREFACE In 2005, the area municipalities of Durham Region began the
More informationAppendix I Lighting Evaluation
Appendix I Lighting Evaluation Harvard Westlake Parking Improvement Plan Lighting Evaluation By: Lighting Design Alliance 27 September 2013 Harvard Westlake Parking Improvement Plan Lighting and Glare
More informationCHAPTER 15 AESTHETICS. Setting. Introduction. Impacts and Mitigation Measures of the 2015 Plan Alternatives
CHAPTER 15 AESTHETICS Introduction Setting Impacts and Mitigation Measures of the 2015 Plan Alternatives CHAPTER 15 AESTHETICS INTRODUCTION Public acceptance of a project may be strongly influenced by
More informationHarvard-Westlake Parking Improvement Plan, Lighting Evaluation, Lighting Design Alliance, September 25, 2013 (Appendix I)
3.1 AESTHETICS The purpose of this section is to characterize the visual (aesthetic) environment that currently exists in the Project area and to identify potential impacts to: visual character, views
More informationWESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT. Addendum to the Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report
PROJECT to the Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report August 2011 Visual and Aesthetic Impacts Technical Report SUMMARY On October 28, 2010, the Metro Board selected the Westwood/VA Hospital Extension
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. VIEWS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. VIEWS INTRODUCTION This section evaluates the potential impacts of the Proposed Project on aesthetics, views and vistas, light and glare, and shade and
More informationCHAPTER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE
CITY OF MOSES LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 18.31 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE Sections: 18.31.010 Purpose 18.31.020 Minimum Lot Area 18.31.030 Setbacks 18.31.040 Maximum
More informationLIGHTING DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION City of Maryland Heights ZONING CODE
SECTION 25-18 City of Maryland Heights ZONING CODE The Zoning Code text contained in the Interpretive Version is current as of Ordinance #2018-4308 adopted on February 15, 2018. The City Planner comments
More informationRequest Modification of Conditions of a Conditional Use Permit approved October 14, Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Stephen White
Applicant Property Owner Public Hearing September 13, 2017 City Council Election District Lynnhaven Agenda Item 3 Request Modification of Conditions of a Conditional Use Permit approved October 14, 2003.
More information4.1 Aesthetics Setting. a. Visual Character
Environmental Impact Analysis Aesthetics 4.1 Aesthetics This section analyzes the proposed Specific Plan s impacts related to aesthetics, including the existing visual character of and scenic views in
More informationB. AESTHETICS. 1. Setting
This section evaluates the effects of the proposed project on the aesthetics of the project site and its surroundings. This analysis also considers the consistency of the proposed project with applicable
More informationARTICLE XVI LIGHTING, NOISE AND ODOR/ODOROUS MATTER Shelby County Zoning Regulations 2013
ARTICLE XVI LIGHTING, NOISE AND ODOR/ODOROUS MATTER Shelby County Zoning Regulations 2013 Section 1600 Section 1601 Section 1602 Lighting Noise Odor/Odorous Matter Section 1600 Lighting A. Purpose and
More informationCity of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission
++ City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission Meeting Date: January 08, 2018 Staff: Subject: Chris Juram, Planning Technician SS12-17 Miramar Homebuilders, R-20 Zoning: Request
More informationPublic Hearing, July 12, 2018
Draft Lighting Ordinance Public Hearing, July 12, 2018 Planning and Development Services staff has developed a draft lighting ordinance for Winston-Salem and Forsyth County at the direction of the City-County
More information6.3 VISUAL RESOURCES. Landscape Character
6.3 VISUAL RESOURCES 6.3.1 Affected Environment The DMR discussion is divided into two areas, DMR and Dillingham Trail, which would extend from SBMR to DMR. The ROI includes all areas within the line of
More information36.1. PURPOSE APPLICABILITY DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 36: DESIGN STANDARDS 36.1. PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that projects are designed and constructed consistent with the Community Design Subelement of the Land Use Element and
More informationCity of Lafayette Staff Report
City of Lafayette Staff Report For: By: Design Review Commission Greg Wolff, Senior Planner Meeting Date: April 27, 2015 Subject: SS03-15 Gundi & Peter Younger (Owners), R-40 Zoning: Request for a Study
More informationAppendix C: Aesthetics
City of Irvine - William Lyon Homes: Vista Verde Draft EIR Appendix C: Aesthetics Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client (PN-JN)\0006\00060034\EIR\3 - DEIR\00060034 Sec99-00 Appendix Dividers Vista Verde.doc
More informationVISUAL RESOURCES 1. INTRODUCTION 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS. a. Visual Character
IV.A VISUAL RESOURCES 1. INTRODUCTION This section addresses the potential changes in visual character that would result from implementation of the proposed Wilshire and La Brea Project. Also evaluated
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Surrounding Area The project site is located at the eastern edge of the Verdugo Mountains in the community of Sunland- Tujunga. Although
More information4.1 AESTHETICS Setting
4.1 AESTHETICS 4.1.1 Setting a. Visual Character of the Project Site and Vicinity. Within its geographic context, the visual character of the project vicinity remains similar to that described in the 1998
More informationMM 3I-1. Minimize Visual Intrusion. No mitigation was included in 2000 SEIR No new mitigation is required.
Section 3I Visual Resources 3I.1 Summary The following is a summary of the proposed project s potential impacts to visual resources, any necessary mitigation measures, and the level of significance after
More information3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology. 3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology
3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology Under the CEQA Guidelines, a cumulative impact consists of an impact which is created as a result of the combination of the project evaluated in the environmental
More information5.1 AESTHETICS Environmental Setting Scenic Views FONTANA FORWARD GENERAL PLAN UPDATE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
5.1 AESTHETICS This section describes the City s scenic resources, and landscape and neighborhood characteristics, and addresses the potential impacts on aesthetic and visual resources associated with
More information7.5 Impacts on the Section 4(f) Properties
constructive use, such as noise, air quality and visual impacts were also assessed. It was determined that this project would not introduce changes of an external nature that would affect the recreational
More informationSECTION LIGHTING REGULATIONS
SECTION 12-1300 LIGHTING REGULATIONS 12-1301 INTENT The purpose of the outdoor illumination standards are to: 1. Provide adequate for safety and security; 2. Reduce light pollution, light trespass, glare,
More informationNORTH COVENTRY TOWNSHIP SUBDIVISION & LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE LIGHTING
NORTH COVENTRY TOWNSHIP SUBDIVISION & LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE LIGHTING Section 628 Lighting Requirements and Design Standards A. Purpose To require and set minimum standards for outdoor lighting to:
More informationCHAPTER FIVE COMMUNITY DESIGN
CHAPTER FIVE COMMUNITY DESIGN CHAPTER FIVE - COMMUNITY DESIGN Assumptions Frazier Park and Lebec have historically developed according to different patterns of spatial form. While both communities are
More information6.14 Visual Quality and Aesthetics
6.14 6.14.1 Introduction This section describes impacts under CEQA that would result from construction and operation of the CEQA Alternatives. 6.14.1.1 Regulatory Setting State There are no federal or
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS/VIEWS EXISTING CONDITIONS REGIONAL SETTING The project area (between Devonshire Street and the SR-118 freeway) is generally characterized by single-family
More informationDepartment of Community Development. Planning and Environmental Review Division Revised Notice of Preparation
Department of Community Development Michael J. Penrose, Acting Director Divisions Building Permits & Inspection Code Enforcement County Engineering Economic Development & Marketing Planning & Environmental
More informationDRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT DEEP VALLEY DRIVE AND INDIAN PEAK ROAD MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. JUNE 2012 SECTION 4.1 AESTHETICS DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 4.1 AESTHETICS Introduction This section provides a discussion of the existing visual and aesthetic resources on
More informationElm Fork Land Use. Trinity River Corridor Project Committee May 13, 2013
Elm Fork Land Use Trinity River Corridor Project Committee May 13, 2013 Purpose Discuss Trinity River planned Land Use and Appropriate Compatible Uses, particularly with respect to the Elm Fork Area 2
More information5.8 Visual Resources and Aesthetic Qualities
I-70 East Supplemental Draft EIS 5.8 Visual Resources and Aesthetic Qualities 5.8 Visual Resources and Aesthetic Qualities This section discusses the visual resources and aesthetic qualities of the study
More informationTable of Contents G.1.a Water Resources - Surface Water - Drainage
Table of Contents G.1.a Water Resources - Surface Water - Drainage 1. INTRODUCTION... 1335 2. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING... 1335 a. Regional Hydrology... 1335 b. Local Hydrology... 1337 c. On-site Hydrology...
More information920 BAYSWATER AVENUE PROJECT
920 BAYSWATER AVENUE PROJECT VISUAL ASSESSMENT Prepared for the City of Burlingame Prepared by Circlepoint 46 S First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 June 2018 This page intentionally left blank. 920 Bayswater
More information3.7 Aesthetics. A. Setting. 1. Existing Views of the Quarry
3.7 Aesthetics A. Setting 1. Existing Views of the Quarry The existing quarry is visible from Highway 101 and from locations on the Ridgewood Ranch to the south. It is also possibly visible from distant
More information5 Visual Resources Project Area Setting
5. Visual Resources 5 Visual Resources This chapter describes the existing visual setting of the Project Area and summarizes the effects on the visual setting that would result from implementation of
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS AND VIEWS 1. INTRODUCTION This section analyzes the potential impacts that could result from the proposed project with
More informationGenex Kidston Connection Project: Draf t Environmental Assessment Report Powerlink Queensland
: Draf t Environmental Assessment Report Powerlink Queensland Chapter 14 \\autsv1fp001\projects\605x\60577456\6. Draft Docs\6.1 Reports\4. Compiled draft 17 September\Covers\Chapters\Ch 14.docx Rev ision
More informationChapter 5: Recreation
Chapter 5: Recreation Introduction and Setting Recreational opportunities within Nevada County are varied, ranging from public parks with intensively used active recreational facilities, to vast tracts
More informationDraft Dark Sky Ordinance. This chapter shall be known as the Malibu Dark Sky Ordinance.
Draft Dark Sky Ordinance Malibu Municipal Code Chapter 17.41 17.41.010. Title. This chapter shall be known as the Malibu Dark Sky Ordinance. 17.41.020. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to implement
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS This section provides a discussion of the visual character of the project site and surrounding area and an analysis of potential visual character, scenic
More informationV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. Aesthetics
A. AESTHETICS Aesthetic impacts for the project have been evaluated under two general categories: 1) Visual Character and Scenic Views, which addresses the general aesthetic value and view impacts relative
More information4.8 Landform Alteration and Aesthetics
4.8 Landform Alteration and Aesthetics 4.8 LANDFORM ALTERATION AND AESTHETICS This section describes the potential environmental effects related to temporary and permanent impacts to landform and aesthetics,
More informationDesign Guidelines for Exterior Lighting
Design Guidelines for Exterior Lighting Adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 26, 2016 Design Guidelines for Exterior Lighting 1. Purpose The purpose of the Design Guidelines for Exterior Lighting
More information6 March 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: OLD DOMINION SOCCER CLUB
REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (outdoor recreational facility soccer fields) 6 March 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: OLD DOMINION SOCCER CLUB PROPERTY OWNER: CALVARY ASSEMBLY OF GOD STAFF PLANNER: Leslie
More information4.1 AESTHETICS INTRODUCTION
4.1 AESTHETICS 4.1.1 INTRODUCTION This section describes the existing visual setting of the project site and vicinity, identifies associated regulatory requirements, evaluates potential impacts, and identifies
More information4.16 Visual Quality and Aesthetics
4.16 4.16.1 Introduction This section describes the affected environment and environmental consequences related to visual quality and aesthetics from operations of the NEPA Alternatives. Information regarding
More informationMonterey Downtown Lighting Strategy
Monterey Downtown Lighting Strategy design standards and guidelines July 2013 public review draft 1 content Introduction 1 Scope of the Project 1 Project Process 2 Character Areas 3 Project Goals 3 The
More informationPlanning Districts INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION To facilitate detailed examination of development prospects for all areas of the community, Delano has been divided into 14 planning districts. The location of these planning districts is
More information2.1.8 Cultural Resources Regulatory Setting. Affected Environment, Environmental
REVISED DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ Affected Environment, Environmental 2.1.8 Cultural Resources This section evaluates the potential for historical and archaeological resources within the proposed
More information