Presentation August 20, 2013

Transcription

1 Presentation August 20, 2013

2 St. Vital Transmission Complex Stakeholder Workshop WELCOME! Manitoba Hydro 9:00am to 1:50pm

3 Purpose of Workshop Share current project information Including outcomes of the Route Selection process Understand local issues and concerns Obtain stakeholder feedback on the route selection process Discuss site-specific concerns Mapping exercises Discuss appropriate mitigation measures to address local issues

4 Workshop Agenda 1. Introduction 10 min. Participants Project Description Deliverables 2. Background 1 hr. Outline of Route Selection Process (EPRI) Outcomes to Date Alternative Routes Environmental Assessment Process Public Engagement Process Property Acquisition Project Schedule Questions

5 Workshop Agenda Refreshment Break /Grouping 15 min. 3. Breakout Discussion/Map Exercise 2 hr. 15 min. Discuss local Issues and Concerns Discuss /Identify Opportunities and Constraints Engineering Environmental Socio-economic Determine Route Preferences Apply the above to Alternative Route Maps Lunch - 15 min. 4. Summary 45 min. Group Presentations Dot-mocracy Exercise 5. Wrap up 5 min.

6 1. Introduction 9:00 to 9:10am 1.1 Manitoba Hydro/Consultant Project Team 1.2 Stakeholders/Workshop Participants 1.3 Project Description 1.4 Deliverables 1.5 Transmission Line Development Process

7 1.1 Manitoba Hydro Project Team Project Coordination Manitoba Hydro Route Selection Photo Science, Inc/MH Stakeholder & Public Engagement AECOM/MH Environmental Assessment Stantec/MH Mapping Stantec Working in tandem

8 1.2 Stakeholder Workshop Representation Agriculture Business and Industry including Trappers Environment Provincial and Groups Health, Education and Policing including EMS Infrastructure Municipal RMs, Towns and Cities Invited through interviews, telephone calls, letters and s Some representatives participated in EPRI Workshops

9 1.3 Project: Two New 230kV Transmission Lines 1.3 Project: St. Vital Station to La Verendrye Station On an existing Manitoba Hydro right-of-way south of Winnipeg - the Southern Loop Will enable the Winnipeg electrical network to withstand severe outages; improve system performance during normal operation, and promote the reliability of the power system in southern Manitoba St. Vital Station to Letellier Station Required to address load and voltage concerns in the South Central area of Manitoba due to load growth

10 1.4 Deliverables Environmental Assessment Report Assessment of a Preferred Route Environmental (including Socio-economic) Impacts Record of Stakeholder and Public Engagement Provincial Review

11 1.5 Transmission Line Development Project Need SSEA EIS Filed Regulatory Approval Process Start to Finish Current Project Site Specific Environmental Assessment Final Design & Property Agreements Construction Monitoring and Follow-Up

12 2. Background 9:10 to 10:10am 2.1 Route Selection Process 2.2 Environmental Assessment Process 2.3 Public Engagement ~ Results to Date 2.4 Property Acquisition 2.5 Schedule 2.6 Questions

13 2.1 Route Selection Process Macro Corridor and Study Area Identification Alternative Corridor Identification (Natural, Built, Engineering & Simple Average) Alternative Route Selection and Review Preferred Route Determination

14 SSEA: Site Selection & Environmental Assessment Regional Siting Criteria and Suitability SSEA Route Selection Stakeholder and Public Engagement Environmental Assessment Study Area Determination Alternate Corridors Alternate Routes Preferred Route

15 Route Selection Methodology Macro Corridor and Study Area Identification Alternative Corridor Identification Engineering, Natural Environment and Built Environment Considerations Simple Average and Composite Corridor Alternative Route Selection and Review Preferred Route Determination

16 The EPRI-GTC Methodology Funnel

17 Macro Corridor Identification Identifies broad areas with least environmental and community impacts Identifies start and end points of the project, and one central point Used to define the outer boundaries/limits of Project Study Area Based on available provincial GIS data sets

18 Marco-Corridor and Study Area The top 5% of the best possible connections within the project area form the macro corridors

19 Alternative Corridor Identification

20 Alternative Corridor Identification External and internal stakeholders determine the relative suitability of different features for routing a transmission line This is focused on a regional scale, prior to application on a specific project Examples of features include: Engineering Natural Built Slope Paralleling existing infrastructure Span-ability of water bodies Wetlands Grasslands Critical habitat National parks Agricultural Recreational trails Historic sites View-shed

21 Alternative Corridor Identification Examples of external stakeholders Trappers Association Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation Manitoba Local Government MAFRI Manitoba Aerial Applicators Manitoba Food and Rural Initiatives Ducks Unlimited Canada Keystone Agricultural Producers Trails Association Manitoba Nature Conservancy

22 Stakeholder Input External and internal stakeholder feedback and contribution was incorporated into the Routing Methodology Stakeholders identified features and suitability values, as well as relative weightings for routing based on Engineering, Natural and Built Environment perspectives This input was used to determine the Alternative Corridors within which Alternative Routes could be drawn

23 Engineering Areas of Least Preference Natural Built Engineering, Natural and Built Environment Features (Criteria), with Scores (1-9)and Weightings

24 Alternative Corridor Identification Weights and relative suitability values are applied to features (or criteria), such as roads, wetlands and forests; or distances from buildings and different slope classifications. The less suitable a feature is, the less likely a corridor will be mapped over that feature.

25 Alternative Corridor Identification Areas of Least Preference are also determined Some examples include: Engineering Natural Built Non span-able water bodies Active Mines and quarries Wildlife refuge Ecological reserves National parks Provincial Parks Federal heritage sites Airports Known archeological sites

26 Alternate Corridor - Engineering Developed by placing five times (5:1:1) emphasis on engineering considerations

27 Alternate Corridor Natural Developed by placing five times emphasis on natural considerations

28 Developed by placing five times emphasis on built considerations Alternate Corridor Built

29 Alternate Corridor - Composite All corridors combine into a Composite Corridor

30 Further Data Gathering Additional data collection for the Route Selection process occurs once corridors are developed This includes existing sources of data, windshield surveys and site visits

31 Alternative Route Selection

32 Alternative Route Selection Multiple routes are developed within the Alternative Corridors Developed by project team taking into account all information gathered to date Buildings

33 Review of Alternative Routes Public and Stakeholders provide input into the Alternative Routes through various avenues, including: Workshops Open Houses Meetings with project team members Manitoba Hydro Project Website

34 Alternative Route Selection An Alternative Route Evaluation Model is used to determine the relative strengths and weaknesses of each route Best

35 Alternative Routes Determined

36 Preferred Route Selection

37 Preferred Route Selection Expert judgment is used to determine the Final Preferred Route Takes into account feedback from Round One engagement and preliminary assessment information Round Two Public Open Houses will provide public feedback on the Final Preferred Route from stakeholders at routing phase and in public and aboriginal engagement

38 Route Selection - Conclusion With the help of stakeholder input, expert judgment and internal expertise, a balanced, transparent and defendable Final Preferred Route is developed.

39 EPRI-GTC* Methodology Stakeholder Calibration Siting Criteria Stakeholders identify/refine and provide relative suitability values (modified Delphi process to gain consensus) Engineering Stakeholders infrastructure co-location Natural Environment Stakeholders natural areas considerations Built Environment Stakeholders land use issues Stakeholders provide relative importance /weights (analytical hierarchy process) Computer-generated corridor models GIS data, moving from general to specific Models for each of the above criteria (5:1:1) Models with Equal weighting Combination Model Expert Judgment (Internal Stakeholders) *Electric Power Research Institute-Georgia Transmission Corp.

40 Benefits of EPRI Process Objective Based on clear identification of criteria by stakeholders Values and weights developed during the process are applied to geographic information As the area of interest becomes more focused and defined, data becomes more detailed and accurate Consistent Algorithms provide replicable results Defensible Understanding what is required and how to do it before determining where to put it