CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION
|
|
- Vivien Clarke
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLN TO CONSTRUCT ELEVEN BUILDINGS ON A 24 ACRE SITE BETWEEN FIFTH STREET, STARGELL AVENUE, MITCHELL AVENUE AND MARINERSQUARE LOOP AND COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ALAMEDA LANDING RETAIL PROJECT. WHEREAS, an application was made by Catellus Development Group, for a Development Plan Amendment and Design Review approval for eleven buildings at the Alameda Landing Retail Center; and WHEREAS, the subject property is designated Specified Mixed Use on the General Plan Diagram; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in a MX (Mixed Use - Planned Development) Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2006 the City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project (a Supplement to the 2000 Final Environmental Impact Report for the Catellus Mixed Use Development Project), and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is consistent with the Bayport-Alameda Landing Project Master Plan (the Master Plan ) as approved by the City Council on January 2, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board adopted the Transportation Demand Management Program and Development Plan for Fifth Street and Mitchell Mosley Avenue on May 14, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board adopted the Alameda Landing Site-Wide Master Landscape Development Plan Amendment and Waterfront Promenade Development Plan on May 29, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board approved the landscape and site improvements for Fifth Street and Mitchell Avenue Extensions on July 23, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board approved the Third Addendum to the Supplemental EIR and the amended Development Plan and Street Plans for the Alameda Landing Retail Center on January 9, 2012; and Planning Board Meeting Page 1 of 5
2 WHEREAS, on February 27, 2012, the Planning Board held a public hearing and approved the Design Review application for the Alameda Landing Retail Center Landscape and Open Space Plan, Building K Design Review, and Building K Sign Program; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2013, the Planning Board held a public hearing on the Development Plan Amendment and Design Review application for eleven buildings at the Alameda Landing Retail Center and has examined pertinent maps, drawings, and documents; and WHEREAS, pursuant to AMC Section and the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Commercial Project Development Agreement, the Planning Board on June 10, 2013, made the following findings relative to Development Plan Amendment and Design Review Application PLN ; Development Plan Amendment Findings: 1. The development is an effective use of the site. The amended Development Plan continues to provide for a retail center, associated parking and pedestrian, transit and bicycle facilities designed to provide a vital commercial center that is pedestrian, bicycle and transit-friendly. The Development Plan utilizes street extensions, landscaping, building placement and orientation, and parking placement to create an effective and successful commercial center that can be marketed and developed expeditiously, that can create a compatible interface with the adjacent properties and uses, and provide strategies for the conservation of non, renewable energy and sustainable design 2. The proposed use relates favorably to the General Plan. The proposed development supports General Plan policies for the redevelopment and reuse of the former Naval Air Station and Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC) facilities, General Plan policies to increase job opportunities and retail opportunities in Alameda, and General Plan policies to extend public streets, bicycle lanes, transit lanes and pedestrian access through the area. 3. The proposed use, if it complies with all conditions upon which approval is made contingent, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity and will not have substantial deleterious effects on existing business districts or the local economy. The Development Plan Amendment is designed to be compatible with the adjacent residential and institutional uses by providing attractive public improvements, ample pedestrian, transit, and bicycle facilities, and placing parking and garbage facilities at the rear of the buildings where they will be screened from adjacent properties. The Urban Decay Analysis completed for this project and included in the EIR Addendum shows that the project will not have substantial deleterious effects on existing business districts or the local economy. Planning Board Meeting Page 2 of 5
3 Alameda residents are currently traveling off-island for many of their shopping needs and this retail center will provide on-island shopping opportunities that do not currently exist on-island. 4. The location of the proposed use is compatible with other land uses in the general neighborhood area, and the project design and size is architecturally, aesthetically, and operationally harmonious with the community and surrounding development. The project site plan is designed to conform to the Alameda Landing Master Plan standards and requirements adopted to ensure that the project would be compatible with adjacent College of Alameda, Bayport residential neighborhood, future development of the former Alameda Naval Air Station and Coast Guard Housing site, and existing and future waterfront uses. The Development Plan Amendment will provide for adequate landscaping including native plans as required by the Site Wide Landscape Development Plan and take maximum advantage of the screening capabilities of landscaping. 5. The proposed use will be served by adequate transportation and service facilities including pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. The Development Plan is designed in a manner compatible with existing and potential contiguous uses. The street network, location of driveways, orientation of retail frontage to Fifth Street, and the location of bicycle facilities, pedestrian facilities, and transit facilities are all designed to complement and support the planned surrounding uses. Design Review Findings: 1. The project will have no significant adverse effects on the persons or property in the vicinity. The landscape and architectural design provides for visually interesting and varied facades and public spaces that are accented with multiple changes in materials and colors to differentiate public spaces, provide for a pleasant pedestrian experience, and create a visually appealing district. Visually appealing vertical elements and materials are used to accent the building, provide for compatibility between the building and future buildings in the vicinity of the project. 2. The project will be compatible and harmonious with the design and use of surrounding area. The project design is appropriate for the site because it is consistent with the Alameda Landing Master Plan and Site-Wide Master Landscape Development Plan and compatible with adjacent planned buildings in scale and character. The proposed design utilizes a number of strategies to create an integrated architectural and landscape design that will result in ten buildings that are compatible with their surroundings, visually interesting, pleasant for shoppers and pedestrians, and adequate to meet the needs of retailers. Each elevation of the buildings is designed as a composite of smaller elements to create a visual relationship with the smaller buildings on and adjacent to, the site and provide some visual interest and rhythm to Planning Board Meeting Page 3 of 5
4 the wall surfaces. Materials with different textures, surfaces, and colors are used to distinguish the repeating elements on the building elevations and create a more interesting façade. The palette of materials and colors that will be supplemented with additional compatible colors and materials to be used on the adjacent residential buildings to ensure that all the new buildings, in combination with a unifying landscape plan and well-designed street system, create a visually appealing new district. The project is consistent with the City of Alameda's Commercial Design Review Guidelines. As conditioned, the project will be consistent with the commercial design guidelines for the project as outlined in the Alameda Landing Master Plan. The architectural design and exterior materials and colors provide for visually interesting and varied facades that are accented with multiple changes in materials and colors to differentiate portions of the building. Visually appealing vertical elements are used to accent the buildings and reinforce the relationship between the building, the landscape, and the surrounding developments. The designs provide for high level architectural design with clean, modern, utilitarian and expressive forms and materials. The designs include bold, simple forms that express an individual identity while maintaining a sense of overall unity with surrounding buildings and landscape. Openings for windows will be recessed into the wall surface in order to express the difference in materials. High quality, durable materials which enhance the building and convey a sense of permanence. The colors are harmonious and the color schemes are simple, using the minimum number of colors necessary to achieve the desired appearance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Board finds that the proposed project implements the Master Plan evaluated in the Environmental Impact Report for the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project (a Supplement to the 2000 Final Environmental Impact Report for the Catellus Mixed-Use Development Project) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (State Clearinghouse # ) and the proposed Design Review approval will not result in any new or substantially more severe environmental impacts than identified in the SEIR and Addenda thereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Board approves Development Plan Amendment and Design Review Application PLN (Attachment A), subject to the following conditions, and readopts by reference the CEQA findings, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and statement of overriding considerations previously approved by City Council Resolution No dated December, 2007: 1. Approved Plans: The plans submitted for the Building Permit shall be in substantial compliance with Exhibit A: Alameda Landing Retail Center Design Review Plans prepared by MCG Architecture and dated May 30, 2013, which are on file in the office of the City of Alameda Planning Division, subject to the conditions specified in this resolution. Planning Board Meeting Page 4 of 5
5 2. Additional Revisions. The applicant shall revise the elevations for buildings B, C, J, H, and I for Planning Board review and approval at a subsequent Planning Board meeting. 3. Bicycle Parking The Building Permit Plans shall show the location of all of the propose bicycle parking areas and that those areas be located adjacent to the main entry areas to the building. 4. Window Insets The Building Permit Plans shall show window details to ensure that windows are recessed at least 2 inches to create shadow lines. 5. Landscape and Open Space Plan The applicant shall comply with all conditions related to site and landscape improvements included in Planning Board Resolution PB The site Improvement Plans shall include the following modifications: a. Tree plantings and seating locations shall be coordinated to ensure that shade is provided for seating areas. b. The tree placement and landscaping within the Stargell Entry Plaza at 5 th Street shall be modified as necessary to provide a buffer for pedestrians in the plaza from passing cars. c. Consideration should be given to including a fountain with falling water in the Stargell Entry Plaza to create background noise and buffer automobile noise. d. The landscape plan will include a full variety of plantings shown on the February 27,, 2012 submittal 6. Amendments: Minor project design details requested by the applicant may be established, modified, and approved by the Director of Community Development or their designee provided that the findings can be made that the proposed changes to the building are consistent in character and quality to the design review plans approved by the Planning Board and attached as Attachment A to this resolution. 7. Vesting: The Design Review approval shall terminate two years from June 10, 2013, unless actual grading, construction under valid permit has commenced, or the developer applies for and is granted a one time twenty four month extension prior to the expiration of the Design Review. The decision of the Planning Board shall be final unless appealed to the City Council, in writing and within ten (10) days of the decision, by filing with the Planning and Building Department a written notice of appeal stating the basis of appeal and paying the required fees. Planning Board Meeting Page 5 of 5
Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion
Future Five Design/ Development Guidelines January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion 5-Points Design Guidelines Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Area boundaries 4 III. Review Process
More informationRESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City certified said General Plan Update FPEIR, which certification was not appealed; and
RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING THE MONTGOMERY 7 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL AND RETAIL PROJECT 565 LORRAINE AVENUE ADDENDUM TO THE DIRIDON STATION AREA PLAN FINAL
More informationCITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 2 March 9, 2011 Project: Description: Applicant: DSR11-004 The applicant is requesting approval to replace the existing exterior wood framed
More informationDesign Review Commission Report
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Design Review Commission Report Meeting Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 Subject:
More informationPlanning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008
Owner/Applicant Taylor Village Sacramento Investments Partners, LP c/o Kim Whitney 1792 Tribute Road #270 Sacramento, CA 95815 Staff Recommendation Planning Commission Staff Report Project: File: Request:
More information4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines
4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines The Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan addresses the area between College Avenue and Steele Lane. Mendocino Avenue is a busy arterial that runs parallel
More information13. New Construction. Context & Character
13. New Construction Context & Character While historic districts convey a sense of time and place which is retained through the preservation of historic buildings and relationships, these areas continue
More informationPC RESOLUTION NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC)
PC RESOLUTION NO. 16-07-26- ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 15-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 15-035, INN AT
More informationCITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET
CITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE Prior to the actual filing of a Master Plan application, it is strongly recommended that the applicant contact Planning
More informationCITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 2017 TO: FROM: Members of the Planning Commission Sara Farrell, Assistant Planner RE: Development Plan Review DR 16-05 The Laundry Room
More informationFRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project
FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project DEVELOPER: SIGNATURE PROPERTIES ARCHITECT: HKIT ARCHITECTS April 23, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Vision 4 Description of Site 5 Guiding Concepts 6
More informationPrepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 13, 2017 Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner REQUEST The applicant requests a Design Review Permit Modification
More informationR E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board is charged with the approval of Detailed Site Plans pursuant to Part 3, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Prince George s
More informationHonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and Development
Office of the City Manager ACTION CALENDAR January 29, 2013 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Christine Daniel, City Manager Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: February 3, 2014 Agenda Item: 7.9 To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Scott Albright,
More informationCITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G. 1 STAFF REPORT August 4, Staff Contact: Tricia Shortridge (707)
CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G. 1 STAFF REPORT August 4, 2009 Staff Contact: Tricia Shortridge (707) 449-5140 TITLE: REQUEST: LONGS / CVS DRIVE-THRU PHARMACY & REMODEL TIME EXTENSION
More informationCITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
COUNCIL AGENDA: 04/11/17 ITEM: W\0^ CITY OF e: :SS SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT File No. C16-030 Applicant: Alex Rubashevsky Location Northwest corner of Oakland Road and
More informationDENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP
DENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP Urban Design Standards and Guidelines November 17, 2008 Amended February 3, 2016 City and County of Denver CF Property Management, Inc. C/O Denver Design District - Starboard
More information1296 Kennedy Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 1296 Kennedy Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: January 15, 2016 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Scarborough Community Council Acting Director,
More informationM E M O R A N D U M CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA
M E M O R A N D U M CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: FROM: The Honorable Landmarks Commission Planning Staff SUBJECT: Certificate
More informationPolicies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center
Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center The Town Center Vision is scattered throughout the Comprehensive Plan, development code and the 1994 Town Center Plan. What follows are sections
More informationITEM 7-A. CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum. Honorable President and Members of the Planning Board. Supervising Planner. Date: August 26, 2013
ITEM 7-A CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: From: Honorable President and Members of the Planning Board Allen Tai Supervising Planner Date: Re: Design Review Application PLN13-0180 to Construct Three Commercial
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 23, 2019 DATE: April 12, 2019 SUBJECT: SP #413 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to permit a fixed bar in a private outdoor café space with associated
More informationSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 10.3 DIVISION: Sustainable Streets BRIEF DESCRIPTION: SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Approving the removal of Municipal Railway bus zones at various
More informationGlenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan
Implementation 114 9.0 IMPLEMENTATION 9.1 OVERVIEW This chapter summarizes the administrative procedures necessary to implement the proposed land use plan, infrastructure improvements, development standards,
More informationSPECIFIC PLAN Requirements
CITY OF LANCASTER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 44933 Fern Avenue, Lancaster, California 93534 (661) 723-6100 SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements Purpose The purpose of a specific plan is to provide for the logical development
More informationORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO ADD A NEW SECTION 4.N. IN THE ZONING CODE FOR THE TOWN OF MIDDLETOWN, RELATING TO MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
Introduced: November 5, 2018 Approved: ORDINANCE 18-11-01 AN ORDINANCE TO ADD A NEW SECTION 4.N. IN THE ZONING CODE FOR THE TOWN OF MIDDLETOWN, RELATING TO MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT BE IT ENACTED BY THE MAYOR
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2015 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair McCormick and Members of the Design Review Committee Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Kelly Christensen
More informationRequest Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form- Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval
Applicant Property Owner Steven H. Murden Public Hearing June 14, 2017 City Council Election District Beach Agenda Item 8 Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort
More informationCHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES Section 1300.00 Section 1300.01 Design Guidelines Purpose The purposes of this section are to: A. The purpose of this Section is to establish procedures and standards to serve
More informationNotice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report and Public Scoping Meeting for the Alameda Shipways Residential Project
Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report and Public Scoping Meeting for the Notice is hereby given that the City of Alameda, Lead Agency, will prepare an Environmental Impact Report
More informationRequest Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair Garage) Staff Planner Kevin Kemp
Request Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair Garage) Staff Planner Kevin Kemp Location 845 Lynnhaven Parkway GPIN 14963473030000 Election District Rose Hall Site Size 0.40 acre portion of a 6.35 acre
More informationBayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines
Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines guidelines for New construction projects and major alterations IN the bayshore boulevard home improvement special use DISTRICT SAN FRANCISCO
More informationInfill Residential Design Guidelines
Infill Residential Design Guidelines Adopted March 23, 2004 Amended September 10, 2013 City of Orange Community Development Department Planning Division Phone: (714) 744-7220 Fax: (714) 744-7222 www.cityoforange.org
More informationWHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on January 14, 2010, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board has reviewed DDS-600 requesting a departure for the location of two loading spaces without driveway access along Toledo Terrace in
More informationCITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in North York Community Council Report 8, which was considered by City Council on October 26, 27 and 28, 2004.
CITY CLERK Consolidated Clause in Report 8, which was considered by City Council on October 26, 27 and 28, 2004. 28 Request for Direction Report - Site Plan Approval Application 03 200020 NNY 24 SA - Marek
More informationMONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No.: Date: 5-03-18 Pike and Rose, Phase I: Site Plan Amendment No. 82012002D Rhoda Hersson-Ringskog,
More informationCity of Larkspur. Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 285
Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 285 Magnolia Avenue Mixed-Use Project Date: December 2, 2013 Responsible Agency: Project Title: 285 Magnolia Avenue Mixed-Use Project Project Address: 285
More informationPlanning Commission Staff Report March 15, 2007
Planning Commission Staff Report Project: Request: Madeira East Tentative Subdivision Map, Design Review for Subdivision Layout & Abandonment of Easements Location: Phase IV of the Laguna Ridge Specific
More informationORDINANCE NO
ATTACHMENT CC-1 ORDINANCE NO. 13-2113 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE REZONING OF AN APPROXIMATELY 1.1 ACRE AREA FROM PARK AND RECREATION (PR) TO PLANNED INDUSTRIAL PARK (P(MP))
More informationC-I-10. The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: B. Reduce the cluttered aspects of current development by:
C-I-10 PART C SECTION I ARTICLE 10 GENERAL REGULATIONS PROJECT SITE REVIEW I. Purpose The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: A. Protect streetscapes from projects that
More informationD3 January 14, 2015 Public Hearing
D3 January 14, 2015 Public Hearing APPLICANT: DONALD J. BOUCHER, JR. PROPERTY OWNER: D.J.B. SERVICE CENTER, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Kristine Gay REQUEST: A. Conditional Change of Zoning (I-1 to B-2) B. Conditional
More informationCONSENT CALENDAR September 27, 2005
Office of the Executive Officer September 27, 2005 To: From: Submitted By: Subject: Honorable Chairperson and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Phil Kamlarz, Executive Officer Dan Marks, Director, Planning
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Legislative Item
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Legislative Item Manufacturing Districts Monument Sign Height Zoning Text Amendment PLNPCM2013-00197 Citywide August 28, 2013 Planning Division Department of Community
More informationApplicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code
Master Development Plan Application Community Development Department City of Redmond 411 SW 9 th Street Redmond, Oregon 97756 541-923-7721 541-548-0706 FAX Master Development Plan Fee $38,862.52 File Number
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting October 15, 2005 DATE: September 28, 2005 SUBJECT: Request to Advertise the adoption of the 2005 Clarendon Sector Plan C. M. RECOMMENDATION:
More informationJoint Study Session of the Sutter County. March 2, 2009
Joint Study Session of the Sutter County Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission March 2, 2009 CURRENT APPLICATION General Plan Amendment Specific Plan Specific Plan Appendices Utility Plans Transit/AQ
More informationRESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension
RESOLUTION NO. R2018-32 Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Capital Committee Board PROPOSED ACTION 09/13/2018
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of March 20, 2007 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #2 Additional and Revised Information DATE: March 20, 2007 SUBJECT: Request to Advertise Public Hearings
More informationSeneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.
Seneca Meadows Seneca Meadows has an industrial park in its southern end and a mixed-use employment area planned for the north end. The district benefits from extensive I-270 visibility, stream valley
More informationSECTION V: DESIGN GUIDELINE EXAMPLES
SECTION V: DESIGN GUIDELINE EXAMPLES Introduction The Syracuse Town Center is envisioned as an area that creates a sense of place, a community downtown. As such, the Town Center Committee recommended the
More informationLocation and Field Inspection: History: Master Plan Recommendation:
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board has reviewed Special Permit Application No. SP-130008, Sudsville Laundry, requesting a special permit to construct an addition and
More informationCommunity Design Plan
Gardena General Plan 2006 Authority While the is not a required element of a General Plan, it is included because improving the community appearance and image is paramount to the overall quality of life
More informationPLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)
Central Permit Center 555 Santa Clara Street Vallejo CA 94590 Business License Building Fire Prevention Planning Public Works 707.648.4310 707.648.4374 707.648.4565 707.648.4326 707.651.7151 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
More informationApproved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, :30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL
Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 2015 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 15-016; Final Planned Unit Development Arden Plaza;
More informationSAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT Certificate of Determination EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Case No.: Project Address: Zoning: UMU (Urban Mixed Use) Zoning District 68-X Height and Bulk District Life Science
More informationCITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS
CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California 90630 (714) 229-6720 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS 1. Discuss project with Planning staff to determine zoning regulations, any unusual characteristics
More informationOfficial Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies
PG.30.1 REPORT FOR ACTION Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies Date: May 15, 2018 To: Planning and Growth Management Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division
More informationSTAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DATE: April 29, 2013 STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 1100 Patricia Boulevard, Prince George, B.C., V2L 3V9 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MAYOR AND COUNCIL JESSE DILL, PLANNER Development Variance
More informationMEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director
MEMORANDUM DATE: March 15, 2019 TO: FROM: Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director SUBJECT: Camino Square, IDA No. CRP-16-02, located at 171
More informationIncentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando
Topic: Resource Type: State: Jurisdiction Type: Municipality: Year (adopted, written, etc.): 2002 Community Type applicable to: Title: Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando Document
More information- INVITATION - COURTESY INFORMATIONAL MEETING
- INVITATION - COURTESY INFORMATIONAL MEETING Hosted by the Property Owner and Project Developer CAMELLIA COURT DEVELOPMENT WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 25, 2017, 7:00 9:00 P.M. BLOY CENTER 1441 S. BENITO AVE, ALHAMBRA,
More informationThanksgiving Point Office Site Plan Approval Planning Commission Report
Lehi City Planning Commission Staff Report Meeting Date: March 24, 2016 Thanksgiving Point Office Site Plan Approval Planning Commission Report Applicant: Sean Onyon VCBO Architecture Requested Action/Purpose:
More informationPlanned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )
Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM2014-00139) Standard residential development Planned Development Example: Smaller lot sizes than what is allowed to create open space amenity. What
More information4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:
. 4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MID-ATLANTIC AUTO PROPERTY OWNER: DZR, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Leslie Bonilla REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (truck rental, automobile service, and automotive/bulk
More informationARTICLE V PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
ARTICLE V PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT A. Purpose and Objective The Planned Unit Development (PUD) procedure provides a flexible land use and design regulation through the use of performance criteria
More information12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH STAFF PLANNER: Faith Christie REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (from PD-H1 Planned
More informationDEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT
6.01. GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Site Planning B. Architectural Design C. Medical Facility Signage & Lighting D. Exhibit 48. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONCEPTS 6.02. MEDICAL FACILITY STANDARDS & GUIDELINES
More informationELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN
ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.0 LOCATION... 2 3.0 EXISTING CONTEXT... 2 4.0 VISION & GUIDING PRINCIPLES... 2 5.0 LAND USE AND BUILT FORM... 4 5.1 St. Laurent
More informationSTAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Conduct Public Hearing to vacate certain public right of way adjacent to Sycamore Avenue and San Pablo Avenue
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: Adjourned Regular Meeting of December 16, 2014 TO: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Holly Smyth, Planning Director Conduct Public Hearing
More informationUrban Design Manual 2.0 DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES. Background. Urban Design Challenges
222221 2.0 DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES Background In recent years, drive-through facilities have grown significantly in popularity with drive-through restaurants, in particular, being established on numerous
More informationCommercial Development Permit Area
City of Kamloops KAMPLAN Commercial Development Permit Area PURPOSE The purpose of this Development Permit Area (DPA) is to establish objectives and provide guidelines for the form and character of commercial
More informationRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS The residential district standards have been revised to reflect on-the-ground conditions, while continuing to respect the use patterns established within the neighborhoods. This will
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 21, 2012 DATE: July 12, 2012 SUBJECT: SP #416 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to modify condition #6 to eliminate requirement to provide a pedestrian
More informationREPORT TO COUNCIL City of Sacramento
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council REPORT TO COUNCIL City of Sacramento 915 I ' Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2604 www. CityofSacramento.org Consent April 1, 2010 Title: Initiation of the Establishment
More informationTHE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER
THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER 123-2013 A By-law to designate the whole of the City of Vaughan as a Site Plan Control Area, and to adopt site development guidelines and rules of procedure for
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report To: From: CC: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: May 21, 2018 Agenda Item: 8-A Grace Page, Senior Planner Stephanie Reich, AIA, LEED
More informationProject phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan
SITE PLAN REVIEW PERMIT APPLICATION City of Grand Haven, 11 N. Sixth Street, Grand Haven, MI 49417 Phone: (616) 847-3490 Fax: (616) 844-2051 Website: www.grandhaven.org 1. Project Information Address/location
More informationDRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES
IHZ Booklet #7 May 6, 2010 DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES CANTERBURY 7 Overview During the recent planning process for the Plan of Conservation and Development community character was identified as an important
More informationEndorse the Alameda Point Conceptual Planning Guide
CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council John A. Russo City Manager Date: July 23,2013 Re: Endorse the Alameda Point Conceptual Planning Guide BACKGROUND The
More informationEXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Town Center Land Use Element: V. LAND USE POLICIES Town Center Mercer Island's business district vision as described in "Your Mercer Island Citizen-Designed Downtown" was an
More informationOfficial Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4897, 2016 (Sewell s Landing)
District of West Vancouver Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4897, 2016 (Sewell s Landing) Effective Date: 1089612v1 District of West Vancouver Official Community Plan Bylaw
More informationEXHIBIT A. Chapter 2.7 SPECIAL PLANNED DISTRICTS. Article XVIII 15th Street School Master Planned Development
EXHIBIT A Chapter 2.7 SPECIAL PLANNED DISTRICTS Article XVIII 15th Street School Master Planned Development Sections: 2.7.3600 15 th Street School Master Planned Development 2.7.3610 Purpose 2.7.3620 Definitions
More informationRezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018
Rezoning Petition 2017-177 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018 REQUEST LOCATION Current Zoning: O-2 (office) and MUDD-O (mixed use development, optional) Proposed Zoning: MUDD-O (mixed use development,
More informationCENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
Applicant s Name: Project Address: NEIGHBORHOOD Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable to the project. Check the box if meets guideline. Indicate
More informationCITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN. UC Davis ESP 171 Urban and Regional Planning April 21, 2011
CITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN UC Davis ESP 171 Urban and Regional Planning April 21, 2011 1 OUTLINE Background Growth and Change Placemaking Sustainability and Climate Change Economic Development 2 City
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019 DATE: February 15, 2019 SUBJECT: Amendment to the Master Transportation Plan (MTP) Map to add a new section of North Kansas
More informationSAN FRANCISCO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION NO
Page 1 SAN FRANCISCO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION NO. 15003 ADOPTING FINDINGS RELATING TO APPROVAL OF A DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE UNDER PLANNING CODE SECTION 309 FOR A PROPOSED PROJECT CONTAINING
More informationORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and
ORDINANCE 17-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA, CREATING ARTICLE XIV OF CHAPTER 118 OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN CODE OF ORDINANCES PROVIDING FOR THE EAST PLANT
More informationUrban Planning and Land Use
Urban Planning and Land Use 701 North 7 th Street, Room 423 Phone: (913) 573-5750 Kansas City, Kansas 66101 Fax: (913) 573-5796 Email: planninginfo@wycokck.org www.wycokck.org/planning To: From: City Planning
More information~P'~'~; SAN FRANCISCO
~o counr~, ~P'~'~; SAN FRANCISCO ~'.~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT a 2 757 O~~~S 0 Case No.: Project Address: Zoning: Certificate of Determination COMMUNITY PLAN EVALUATION UMU (Urban Mixed Use) District 58-X Height
More informationAppendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION The continuous and desirable improvement of Arnprior requires a clear understanding of what is envisioned for the Town. These Design
More informationD1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:
D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: BEACH MUNICIPAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PROPERTY OWNER: SISTERS II, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Karen Prochilo REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (AG-2 Agriculture
More informationPlanning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009
Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009 Project: Warda Warehouse File: EG-08-051 Request: Design Review Location: 9260 Bendel Place APNs: 134-0660-004 Planner: Gerald Park Property Owner/Applicant
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012 TO: FROM: Members of the Planning Commission Michael Klein, Associate Planner FILE NO.: 120000890 PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: Request for an Administrative
More informationTown Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)
Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan) Mercer Island Town Center Looking North (2014) In 1994, a year-long process culminated in a set of design guidelines and code requirements for the Town Center
More informationRESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
DRAFT RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES Resident ial Standards and Guidelines For the Unincorporated Communities of West Alameda County TASK FORCE MEETING March 22, 2010 Tonight s Meeting Overview
More informationSUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')
TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Community Development Department SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')
More information1. Avoid extensive blank walls that would detract from the experience and appearance of an active streetscape.
08 ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL Once a building s massing and street wall have been defined, architectural details, including façade variation, materials and window treatment, shape a building s visual identity.
More informationCITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 27, 2014
CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 27, 2014 Item 6, Report No. 21, of the Committee of the Whole, which was adopted without amendment by the Council of the City of Vaughan on May
More information