PETITION NUMBER: V DISTRICT, LAND LOT 2/2, 454 OVERLAY DISTRICT HIGHWAY 9 EXISTING ZONING AG-1 ACRES 1

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "PETITION NUMBER: V DISTRICT, LAND LOT 2/2, 454 OVERLAY DISTRICT HIGHWAY 9 EXISTING ZONING AG-1 ACRES 1"

Antonia Lynch
6 years ago
Views:

PETITION NUMBER: V15-026 PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 440 Galloway Court, White Columns DISTRICT, LAND LOT 2/2, 454 OVERLAY DISTRICT HIGHWAY 9 EXISTING ZONING AG-1 ACRES 1 EXISTING USE FUTURE LAND

1 PETITION NUMBER: V PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 440 Galloway Court, White Columns DISTRICT, LAND LOT 2/2, 454 OVERLAY DISTRICT HIGHWAY 9 EXISTING ZONING AG-1 ACRES 1 EXISTING USE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION SINGLE FAMILY HOME AEE AGRICULTURAL, ESTATE, EQUESTRIAN REQUESTED VARIANCES: To allow an accessory structure in the minimum setback of the (second) front yard (Section 64,416,b) PETITIONER(S) ADDRESS Bobbie Ferqueron 440 Galloway Court Milton, GA 30004

2 Page 2 of 10

3 STAFF CONTACT: ANGELA RAMBEAU Background: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF ANALYSIS The site, 440 Galloway Court, is a single family home located on approximately 1acre in the White Columns subdivision. It is zoned AG-1 and is in the State Route 9 overlay. The applicants, Steve and Bobbie Ferqueron constructed a play set for their children in the back of their home, approximately 13 feet from the road. The rear of the home fronts Nix Road, creating another front yard, with a 60 foot setback. A play set is considered an accessory structure, and therefore is supposed to stay out of all minimum yards. The applicant stated that the play set was placed there because it is the only flat place that was suitable. Section ,I states that accessory structures may be located in the rear or side yards, but shall not be located within a minimum yard. Because the play set is placed in the second front setback, a variance is required. Page 3 of 10

4 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD (DRB) COURTESY REVIEW: The DRB reviewed the proposed case on October 6, and offered the following comments: The DRB recommends denial. If the BZA approves the variance, the DRB suggests the conditions of adding a 3 or 4 board horse type fence, and/or add screening. ADDITIONAL DEPARTMENT COMMENTS The staff held a Focus Meeting on October 8, 2015, at which the following comments were provided: SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF CONTACT JIMMY SANDERS ARCHITECT STAFF CONTACT ROBERT BUSCEMI ARBORIST STAFF CONTACT MARK LAW DOT/STORMWATER STAFF CONTACT SARAH LEADERS No comments. The setback should be respected; the play set should be removed. No comments. No comments. Page 4 of 10

5 Standards for Consideration: The approval of a variance is based on the following consideration(s): Relief, if granted would not offend the spirit or intent of the Ordinance. There are such extraordinary and exceptional situations or conditions pertaining to the particular piece of property that the literal or strict application of the Ordinance would create an unnecessary hardship due to size, shape or topography or other extraordinary and exceptional situations or conditions not caused by the variance applicant. Relief, if granted would not cause a substantial detriment to the public good and surrounding properties. That the public safety, health and welfare are secured, and that substantial justice is done. The applicant response: This variance application is being submitted to request a variance for a Play Structure installed on the subject property. After much consideration, the location was chosen to install the Play Structure because it is the ONLY level site on the property to install such a structure. The only permitted location is in the rear yard, which is mostly sloped and/or heavily vegetated. Therefore, this location was selected. At the time of purchase and installation, we had recently relocated from California to Milton, Georgia and were unaware of the City and/or HOA requirements for structures of this type. Thus, this Play Structure was located approximately 16 from the rear property line, which abuts Nix Road, and within the setback. However, it is not unsightly and is of little or no consequence to any reasonable individual. The staff response: The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance includes the regulation of the location of structures; the Ordinance clearly states that accessory structures are not allowed in minimum yards. More than one Nix Road property owners have objected to the location of the structure. A child running out into the road to chase a ball or pet, could cause an accident, as well as endanger the child. For these reasons, placing the structure so close to the road, without fencing could be considered a detriment to the public good and safety. Page 5 of 10

6 Recommended conditions: Should the Board choose to approve the application, Staff recommends the following conditions(s): The applicant shall put up a 3 or 4 board horse style fence with attached wire. The applicant shall plant evergreens to screen the play set from the view of the adjacent property. Planting plan to be approved by the City Arborist. Staff recommendation: Staff recommends denial of this request. Page 6 of 10

7 July 14, 2015 Ms. Angela Cutler Rambeau Principal Planner Deerfield Parkway, Suite 107F Milton, GA Re: Letter of Appeal for a Variance at: 440 Galloway Court Milton, Georgia To Whom it May Concern: This variance application is being submitted to request a variance for a Play Structure installed on the subject property. After much consideration, the location was chosen to install the Play Structure because it is the ONLY level site on the property to install such a structure. The only permitted location is in the rear yard, which is mostly sloped and/or heavily vegetated. Therefore, this location was selected. At the time of purchase and installation, we had recently relocated from California to Milton, Georgia and were unaware of the City and/or HOA requirements for structures of this type. Thus, this Play Structure was located approximately 16 from the rear property line, which abuts Nix Road, and within the setback. However, it is not unsightly and is of little or no consequence to any reasonable individual. We make this appeal for a variance so that the play structure can remain in whole at its present location because there is no other suitable location, which could result in the removal of our children s Play Structure if this hardship is not granted. We respectfully request this variance and are appreciative of your thoughtful consideration of these facts. Sincerely, Bobbie M. Ferqueron Owner Page 7 of 10

8 Page 8 of 10

9 Page 9 of 10

10 Page 10 of 10

11 PETITION NUMBER: V PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS White Columns Drive DISTRICT, LAND LOT 2/2, 485,524 OVERLAY DISTRICT STATE ROUTE 9 EXISTING ZONING AG-1 ACRES1.49 EXISTING USE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION SINGLE FAMILY HOME AEE AGRICULTURAL, ESTATE, EQUESTRIAN REQUESTED VARIANCES: To allow a swimming pool and deck to encroach into the 50 foot stream buffer To allow a swimming pool and deck to encroach into the 75 foot impervious setback (Section , i, ii) PETITIONER(S) ADDRESS Michael Cochran, Atlanta Pools, Inc Antioch Road Cumming, GA 30040

12 Page 2 of 10

13 STAFF CONTACT: ANGELA RAMBEAU Background: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF ANALYSIS The site, White Columns Drive, is a single family home located on approximately 1.25 acres in the White Columns subdivision. It is zoned AG-1 and is in the State Route 9 overlay. The applicant, Michael Cochran, has contracted with, Brent and Laura Warren, the property owners, to build a swimming pool and deck in the rear of their house. When this lot was platted, the County only required a 25 foot stream buffer. This has since been changed to include a 50 foot stream buffer, and 75 foot impervious setback. The new stream buffers now cover more than half of the lot. Section 20, 426 i and ii state that an undisturbed natural vegetative buffer shall be maintained for 50 feet.and an additional setback shall be maintained for 25 feet in which all impervious cover shall be prohibited. Since the proposed pool encroaches in to the 50 foot stream buffer, as well as the 75 foot impergious setback, a two part variance is required. Page 3 of 10

14 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD (DRB) COURTESY REVIEW: On October 6, 2015, the DRB offered the following comments: Eliminate paved area in the 50 foot buffer area; pervious pavers can be used. ADDITIONAL DEPARTMENT COMMENTS The staff held a Focus Meeting on October 8, 2015, at which the following comments were provided: SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF CONTACT JIMMY SANDERS ARCHITECT STAFF CONTACT ROBERT BUSCEMI ARBORIST STAFF CONTACT MARK LAW DOT/STORMWATER STAFF CONTACT SARAH LEADERS No comments. Can part of the deck be constructed of pervious materials? No comments. No comments. Page 4 of 10

15 Standards for Consideration: The approval of a variance is based on the following consideration(s): The shape, size, topography, slope, soils, vegetation and other physical characteristics of the property; The locations of all streams on the property, including along property boundaries; The location and extent of the proposed buffer or setback intrusion; Whether alternative designs are possible which require less intrusion or no intrusion; The long-term and construction water quality impacts of the proposed variance; and Whether issuance of the variance is at least as protective of natural resources and the environment. The applicant response: The variance would not offend the spirit or intent of the Ordinance because the location of the proposed swimming pool and the existing fence would in no way affect any of the neighboring properties, nor would I harm the view or the useable area of any neighboring property. When the home was originally built, there as a 25 foot buffer, which has since been changed to a 50 foot buffer and additional 25 foot impervious setback. The size of this lot would require a swimming pool be constructed directly behind the home. Due to the placement of the septic system, the proposed pool has been placed as far to the right as possible from the buffer and cannot be moved over any further. Relief if granted would not cause a substantial detriment to the public good and surrounding properties, as this requested variance is the minimum necessary to accomplish the proposed development. There is no backwashing of the pool. The proposed decking is to be pervious paver decking which allows any water to dissipate into the ground, and we are capturing water from all downspouts and storing in gravel pit on the property. The staff response: The size of the lot, location of the septic systems, and stream buffers limit the placement of a swimming pool. The stream buffers now cover more than half of the lot, and the septic tank is located in the only area available in the rear yard that is not covered by the current stream buffers. The proposed pool is placed directly behind the house, thereby minimizing any visual impact on the adjacent properties. The applicant is proposing several mitigation procedures, including pervious pavers, and an absorption pit, which would limit the impact on the buffer. Page 5 of 10

16 Recommended conditions: Should the Board choose to approve the application, Staff recommends the following conditions(s): Pervious pavers shall be used in the 50 foot stream buffer and 75 impervious setback areas. Staff recommendation: Staff recommends approval with conditions of this request. Page 6 of 10

17 Page 7 of 10

18 Page 8 of 10

19 Page 9 of 10

20 Page 10 of 10

PETITION NUMBER(S): V10-002

PETITION NUMBER(S): V10-002 PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 325 Gunston Hall Circle DISTRICT, LAND LOT 2/2, 927 OVERLAY DISTRICT NORTHWEST FULTON EXISTING ZONING AG-1 ACREAGE 1.11 EXISTING USE SINGLE FAMILY