AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Zachary Dahl, Planning Services Manager Current Planning Jon Biggs, Community Development Director Chris Jordan, City Manager

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Zachary Dahl, Planning Services Manager Current Planning Jon Biggs, Community Development Director Chris Jordan, City Manager"

Transcription

1 STUDY SESSION Agenda Item # 11 Meeting Date: December 13, 2016 AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY Subject: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved by: First Street Office Building and Public Park Zachary Dahl, Planning Services Manager Current Planning Jon Biggs, Community Development Director Chris Jordan, City Manager Attachment(s): 1. Applicant Cover Letter 2. Conceptual Project Plans 3. Commercial Design Review Findings and Guidelines Initiated by: Fiscal Impact: Undetermined Environmental Review: Undetermined Policy Question(s) for Council and Commission Consideration: For the proposed office building development: o Is a two-story or three-story building more appropriate for the site? o How should the office building relate to First Street and the adjacent multiple-family residential buildings in terms of setbacks and massing? o How should the building be modulated in terms of bulk, mass and scale? o What types of architectural design elements and exterior materials should the project incorporate? For the proposed public park/plaza on a portion of Plaza 7: o Does the concept of a new public park with underground public parking in this location have merit? o What types of uses, features and amenities should a public park include? For the remainder of Plaza 7, are there any specific uses, features and/or amenities that the City should evaluate for this site? Specifically, should the City consider an access ramp to the proposed underground public parking from Second Street?

2 Subject: First Street Office Building and Public Park Summary: A new office building with some ground floor retail space, approximately 60,000 square feet in size with two-levels of underground parking, is proposed along First Street adjacent to Plaza 7. A new park/plaza is proposed on Plaza 7 with new underground public parking to replace the displaced surface parking at a one-for-one ratio. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council and Planning and Transportation Commission consider the proposed project and provide feedback to the applicant regarding the policy questions raised in this report and the proposed project. December 13, 2016 Page 2

3 Subject: First Street Office Building and Public Park Purpose The Study Session is to provide the City Council and the Planning and Transportation Commission an opportunity to discuss the proposed office development and park/plaza and provide guidance and feedback to staff and the applicant. Background (LACI) owns seven connected parcels along First Street in Downtown Los Altos ( First Street) that total approximately one acre. LACI, along with its development manager Sares Regis, are in the process of developing a plan to build a new office building on its property. As part of this project, LACI has approached the City about a possible public/private partnership to construct a new park/plaza on the western portion of the City owned public parking lot known as Parking Plaza 7. On September 13, 2016, a joint study session with the City Council and the Planning and Transportation Commission was held to discuss the development concept and provide preliminary guidance to staff and the applicant. The study session concluded with the Council and Commission expressing interest in the concept of a public park/plaza with underground parking at Plaza 7 and entering into an exclusive negotiating agreement with LACI in order to further explore the concept. The Council also directed staff to proceed with the evaluation of potential options for the remainder of Plaza 7 if the LACI proposal were to move forward. Discussion/Analysis Office Building The parcels that comprise the project site ( First Street) are designated as Downtown Commercial in the City s General Plan and zoned CD/R3 (Commercial Downtown/Multiple- Family). The proposed project is a new office building with some ground floor retail/restaurant space approximately 60,000 square feet in size with two levels of underground parking. Additional information about the project is included in the applicant s cover letter (Attachment 1). Office and retail uses are permitted in the CD/R3 District and require a parking ratio of one space per 300 square feet of net floor area for office uses and one space per 200 square feet of net floor area for retail uses. The plans include conceptual site plans and massing models for a two-story and three-story building. The following table summarizes the project s technical details for both the twostory and three-story building and the CD/R3 District requirements: Two-Story Bldg Three-Story Bldg Required FLOOR AREA: 58,800 square feet 58,800 square feet N-A December 13, 2016 Page 3

4 Subject: First Street Office Building and Public Park SETBACKS: Front (First Street) Rear (Alley) North Side South Side (Plaza 7) 8-20 feet feet 0-10 feet 5-11 feet feet feet 0-10 feet 31 feet 2 feet 2 feet 0 feet 2 feet HEIGHT 1 : Top of Roof Deck (First St) Top of Roof Deck (Alley) Top of Parapet (First St) Top of Parapet (Alley) 28 feet 33 feet 32 feet 37 feet 41 feet 46 feet 45 feet 50 feet 30 feet 30 feet 38 feet 38 feet : 196 spaces 196 spaces 196 spaces 2 The applicant team is seeking higher level architectural and site design feedback from the Council and Commission as they develop their project design. The primary question is related to the project s height and if a two-story or three-story project is appropriate at this location. In addition, feedback should be provided with regards to how the office building should relate to First Street and the multi-family buildings to the rear in terms of setbacks, massing and scale. Feedback on types of architectural design elements and exterior materials should the project incorporate or avoid would also be appropriate at this stage in the design process. To be consistent with the City s Zoning Code and adopted plans, the feedback should be based on the Commercial Design Review Findings (Section ), Design Controls for the CD/R3 District (Section ) and the Downtown Design Guidelines (Attachment 3). Public Park/Plaza Adjacent to the proposed office building, the applicant is proposing a new park to be located on a portion of Plaza 7. Plaza 7 is 1.06 acres in size and the park would occupy approximately 0.4 acres, which is about twice the size of Veterans Community Plaza. The size of park has been reduced from the earlier concept to maintain the existing drive aisle, parking spaces and street trees that are adjacent to the rear facades of the State Street commercial buildings. The conceptual site plan includes a mixture of uses, features and amenities that could be included in this space. For this element of the project, feedback should be provided on the site design, the proposed underground public parking and proposed mix of uses and amenities. Specifically, for the access to the underground public parking, feedback should be provided regarding the proposed design and 1 These height measurements are approximate and may change as the project design is further developed. 2 The number of required parking spaces is based on the office parking requirement of 1/300 sq ft. Once the size of the retail space is determined, this number will be adjusted accordingly. December 13, 2016 Page 4

5 Subject: First Street Office Building and Public Park location of the access point. Also, based on the proposed design of the park, feedback on how to utilize the remaining portion of Plaza 7 should be provided to staff. Specifically, should staff evaluate an access ramp to the underground public parking from Second Street? Based on the feedback provided, staff will continue to work with the applicant as the design of the project is further developed and refined. In addition, staff is in the process of retaining appropriate consultants to assist in review and evaluation of the project and potential improvements to the remaining portion of Plaza 7. December 13, 2016 Page 5

6 December 2, N. San Antonio Road Los Altos, CA RE: Pre-submittal Public Study Session on December 13, 2016 Mayor Bruins, and Honorable Members of the City Council and Planning and Transportation Commission: We look forward to discussing our proposed project, entitled First Street Green, during the public study session on December 13 th. Attached for your consideration, please find our conceptual pre-submittal drawings. The scope of the project includes a roughly 60,000 gross square foot office building, potentially with a small retail component facing a proposed park. Two design options are presented in the drawings: a 3 story option and a 2-story option. The 3- story option is contemplated in association with Los Altos Municipal Code section As our team works toward a formal planning submittal, we will be discussing these options with multiple stakeholders, considering a range of criteria, and selecting a single option. During the study session, we would appreciate your input regarding the feasibility of pursing the 3-story option. In addition, as a separate action on December 13 th, we are requesting approval of an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) to develop and construct a public park and subterranean parking garage on the western portion of the surface parking lot known as parking plaza 7 (APN: ), including replacing the current number of parking stalls provided in the plaza. Further advancement of the park design will follow the execution of the ENA. First Street Green offers a vision of downtown Los Altos as a thriving community with architecture and site design that reflects the innovation demonstrated by its business leaders in Silicon Valley. It tells a story with landscape and public space, while creating public amenities that support downtown life. A smart office design - efficient in use of materials, energy, water, and space - results in a truly sustainable design: a place that sustains the highest quality of life and workplace in Los Altos for the next century. The following goals guide this redevelopment proposal: A community gathering place for downtown The park, or green, is intended as a first step in reinvigorating public space in Los Altos. It represents a vision of community laced with active open spaces that cater to the wide range of residents; a place where people are seen and cars are hidden; and a modern landscape that reflects the spirit of innovation inherent to this commercial district. The green is a shared social hub and open space where workplace, family, and friends coalesce. An office building that builds upon the charm of Los Altos The architecture will be true to the committed intent and values of its community-oriented ownership. The building and site represent a love and respect for the traditional urbanistic value SRGNC CRES, LLC 901 Mariners Island Boulevard, 7 th Floor, San Mateo, California T: F: ATTACHMENT 1

7 First Street Green Study Session December 2, 2016 Page 2 of 2 of human-scale and charm of the downtown while boldly proclaiming a dynamic, environmentallyconscious, and economically-vital future for the downtown. An exceedingly comfortable, healthy, and productive work environment Indoor space is designed to be pleasing to the senses and support the core missions of the building s professional tenants. Building form and systems design should result in a well-daylighted space with thoughtfully choreographed views to the landscape below and hills beyond. Passive and active systems should provide for an exceptionally comfortable and controllable thermal environment with the highest air quality. A high-performance building that achieves environmental and economic sustainability Efficient performance of building systems will be enhanced by the smart use of passive resources available on site, including solar, daylighting, and natural ventilation. A near net zero building with positive, lasting financial benefits is the aspirational goal. Smart planning will allow flexibility for a variety of tenant sizes and needs. Strong financial returns will allow the project to support the park component in a sustainable, lasting manner. As previously noted, we are exploring the relative merits of two options: a 3 story option and a 2-story option. Both options have the same parking capacity in a two level underground garage of 196 parking spaces dedicated to the building occupants and an additional 52 spaces for the public, which replace the current parking spaces at a ratio of 1:1. The allowable net building square footage at 1 parking space per 300 NSF is 58,800. The equivalent gross square footage using Los Altos planning definition for this purpose is 60,618 GSF. Both the 3-story option and the 2-story option presented are this size. In order for this project to be financially viable, we are showing the maximum square footage, as determined by the parking requirements. Both options show a garage entry ramp along a widened alley, continuing the pattern of existing garage entries along the alley. Additional features of the two options are summarized as follows: Three-story option: Three-stories in height for more than half of the building footprint Third story allows smaller footprint and deep setback from First Street Combination of two and three-story massing provides variety from all frontages Abundant roof decks from the second floor roof animate the façade and provide exceptional views to the Los Altos hills Two-story option: Two-stories with added height clerestory along the building spine Larger footprint results in lesser setback from all property lines Break down of massing achieved through carving out courtyard, entries and second floor balconies Clerestory spine running through building emerges at the south end to provide a focal point for the façade facing the proposed park Thank you again for your review. We look forward to your feedback. Sincerely, SRGNC CRES, LLC Meris A. Ota Vice President

8 12/1/2016 2:23:54 PM PROJECT INFO VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: Sares Regis Group of Northern California 901 Mariners Island Boulevard, Suite 700 San Mateo, CA T: Contact: Meris Ota, Vice President mota@srgnc.com OWNER: 110-1st Street Los Altos, CA T: Contact: Kelly Snider, Managing Director kelly@losaltoscommunityinvestments.com ADDRESS: st Street Los Altos, CA BLOCK/LOT: 14/040, 14/041, 14/042, 14/043, 14/044, 14/045, 14/126 PLANNING INFO ZONING DISTRICT: CD/R3 Commercial Downtown/Multiple Family SPACES 196 ALLOWABLE 1 SPACE PER 300 NSF 58,800 ASSUMED GSF 60,619 PARK 1:1 PROJECT SITE C-0 COVER SHEET OPEN SPACE SCHEME A-1 SITE PLAN A-2 SITE PROGRAM A-3 LEVEL 1 PLAN A-4 LEVEL 2 PLAN A-5 LEVEL 3 PLAN A-6 ROOF PLAN A-7 BUILDING SECTIONS A-8 MASSING VIEWS REDUCED HEIGHT SCHEME B-1 SITE PLAN B-2 SITE PROGRAM B-3 LEVEL 1 PLAN B-4 LEVEL 2 PLAN B-5 ROOF PLAN B-6 BUILDING SECTIONS B-7 MASSING VIEWS GARAGE (SAME IN BOTH SCHEMES) G-1 GARAGE LEVEL 1 PLAN G-2 GARAGE LEVEL 2 PLAN SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION COVER SHEET ATTACHMENT 2 C-0

9 12/1/2016 2:23:39 PM 3-STORY RESIDENTIAL 3-STORY RESID'L 1-STORY RESID'L 1-STORY GARAGE 3-STORY RESIDENTIAL 3-STORY RESIDENTIAL PUBLIC PLAZA 7 2-STORY COMM'L 16' ALLEY STAIR/ELEV TO GARAGE 2-STORY COMM'L 2-STORY SHASTA STREET 2-STORY COMM'L 10' GARAGE ENTRANCE LOBBY ENTRANCE PROPOSED 3-STORY BUILDING COURTYARD 38' 10' 31' RETAIL ENTRANCE PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK (E) ANGLE (E) COMMERCIAL LOADING 1-STORY COMM'L 2-STORY COMM'L 3-STORY COMM'L EXISTING BUILT FOOTPRINT 1ST STREET C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt 4-STORY RESIDENTIAL 2-STORY SITE PLAN - OPEN SPACE SCHEME SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" SAFEWAY /LOADING SAFEWAY EXISTING BUILT FOOTPRINT 19,800 SF PROPOSED FOOTPRINT 21,600 SF SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION SITE PLAN A-1

10 12/1/2016 2:23:40 PM C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA T F Printing PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW Date CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION SITE PROGRAM A-2

11 12/1/2016 2:23:41 PM F E DOWN TO GARAGE RAMP TO BELOW DOWN TO GARAGE SHASTA STREET D C UP TO LEVEL 2 RETAIL ENTRANCE B LOBBY ENTRANCE A C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - OPEN SPACE SCHEME SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 1ST STREET EXTERIOR DECK TENANT RETAIL TENANT SERVICE UTILITY CIRCULATION 32' 24' 16' 8' 0' 32' 64' SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION LEVEL 1 PLAN A-3

12 12/1/2016 2:23:41 PM F E D C B A C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN - OPEN SPACE SCHEME SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR DECK TENANT RETAIL TENANT SERVICE UTILITY CIRCULATION 32' 24' 16' 8' 0' 32' 64' SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION LEVEL 2 PLAN A-4

13 12/1/2016 2:23:42 PM F E D AHU C ROOF DECK B A C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN - OPEN SPACE SCHEME SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR DECK TENANT RETAIL TENANT SERVICE UTILITY CIRCULATION 32' 24' 16' 8' 0' 32' 64' SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION LEVEL 3 PLAN A-5

14 12/1/2016 2:23:42 PM F E D C PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS B A C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt ROOF PLAN - OPEN SPACE SCHEME SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 32' 24' 16' 8' 0' 32' 64' SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION ROOF PLAN A-6

15 12/1/2016 2:23:44 PM F E D C B A PROFILE OF EXISTING 127 1ST STREET 48' ALLEY 43' - 0" FIRST STREET ROOF EL +41' - 0" LEVEL 3 EL +28' - 0" LEVEL 2 EL +15' - 0" LEVEL 1 EL +0' - 0" BASEMENT 1 EL -13' - 0" BASEMENT 2 EL -23' - 0" 16' ROW 142' 60' ROW CROSS SECTION - OPEN SPACE SCHEME SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt PARK LONGITUDINAL SECTION - OPEN SPACE SCHEME SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" RETAIL COURT 300' GARAGE RAMP 32' 24' 16' 8' 0' 32' 64' ROOF EL +41' - 0" LEVEL 3 EL +28' - 0" LEVEL 2 EL +15' - 0" LEVEL 1 EL +0' - 0" BASEMENT 1 EL -13' - 0" BASEMENT 2 EL -23' - 0" SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION BUILDING SECTIONS A-7

16 12/1/2016 2:23:47 PM PROPOSED 3-STORY BUILDING WITH DISTINCT MASSING FOR DAYLIGHTING AND ARTICULATION SHASTA STREET APPROXIMATE LOBBY ENTRANCE LOCATION 1ST STREET ALLEY WITH EXISTING RESIDENTIAL GARAGE ENTRANCES SAFEWAY /LOADING SAFEWAY PUBLIC PLAZA 7 STAIR/ELEVATOR TO PUBLIC PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK SOUTHWEST AXONOMETRIC - OPEN SPACE SCHEME C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt SAFEWAY POTENTIAL RETAIL SPACE PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK STAIR/ELEVATOR TO PUBLIC SOUTHEAST AXONOMETRIC - OPEN SPACE SCHEME ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ALONG ALLEY PUBLIC PLAZA 7 SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MASSING VIEWS A-8

17 12/1/2016 2:23:47 PM 3-STORY RESIDENTIAL 3-STORY RESID'L 1-STORY RESID'L 1-STORY GARAGE 3-STORY RESIDENTIAL 3-STORY RESIDENTIAL PUBLIC PLAZA 7 2-STORY COMM'L 2-STORY SHASTA STREET 2-STORY COMM'L 10' 10' 16' GARAGE ENTRANCE 20' ALLEY PARALLEL /LOADING PROPOSED 2-STORY BUILDING COURTYARD 10' 11' STAIR/ELEV TO GARAGE 5' RETAIL ENTRANCE PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK (E) ANGLE (E) COMMERCIAL LOADING 2-STORY COMM'L 1-STORY COMM'L 2-STORY COMM'L 3-STORY COMM'L 20' LOBBY ENTRANCE 8' EXISTING BUILT FOOTPRINT 1ST STREET C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt 4-STORY RESIDENTIAL 2-STORY SITE PLAN - REDUCED HEIGHT SCHEME SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" SAFEWAY /LOADING SAFEWAY EXISTING BUILT FOOTPRINT 19,800 SF PROPOSED FOOTPRINT 30,000 SF SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION SITE PLAN B-1

18 12/1/2016 2:23:48 PM C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA T F Printing PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW Date CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION SITE PROGRAM B-2

19 12/1/2016 2:23:49 PM F E RAMP TO BELOW DOWN TO GARAGE SHASTA STREET D C RETAIL ENTRANCE DOWN TO GARAGE UP TO LEVEL 2 B A LOBBY ENTRANCE C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - REDUCED HEIGHT SCHEME SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 1ST STREET EXTERIOR DECK TENANT RETAIL TENANT SERVICE UTILITY CIRCULATION 32' 24' 16' 8' 0' 32' 64' SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION LEVEL 1 PLAN B-3

20 12/1/2016 2:23:50 PM F E D C B A C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN - REDUCED HEIGHT SCHEME SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR DECK TENANT RETAIL TENANT SERVICE UTILITY CIRCULATION 32' 24' 16' 8' 0' 32' 64' SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION LEVEL 2 PLAN B-4

21 12/1/2016 2:23:50 PM F AHU E D PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS C B A C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt ROOF PLAN - REDUCED HEIGHT SCHEME SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 32' 24' 16' 8' 0' 32' 64' SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION ROOF PLAN B-5

22 12/1/2016 2:23:51 PM F E D C B A PROFILE OF EXISTING 127 1ST STREET ALLEY 35' 7' 30' 7' 1ST STREET ROOF A EL +35' - 0" LEVEL 2A2 EL +15' - 0" LEVEL 1 EL +0' - 0" BASEMENT 1 EL -13' - 0" BASEMENT 2 EL -23' - 0" 16' ROW 142' 60' ROW CROSS SECTION - REDUCED HEIGHT SCHEME SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" ROOF A EL +35' - 0" C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt PARK LONGITUDINAL SECTION - REDUCED HEIGHT SCHEME SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" RETAIL 300' GARAGE RAMP 32' 24' 16' 8' 0' 32' 64' LEVEL 2A EL +15' - 0" LEVEL 1 EL +0' - 0" BASEMENT 1 EL -13' - 0" BASEMENT 2 EL -23' - 0" SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION BUILDING SECTIONS B-6

23 12/1/2016 2:23:54 PM PROPOSED 2-STORY BUILDING WITH RAISED CENTRAL SPINE FOR DAYLIGHTING AND MASSING ARTICULATION SHASTA STREET APPROXIMATE LOBBY ENTRANCE LOCATION 1ST STREET ALLEY WITH EXISTING RESIDENTIAL GARAGE ENTRANCES SAFEWAY /LOADING SAFEWAY PUBLIC PLAZA 7 STAIR/ELEVATOR TO PUBLIC PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK SOUTHWEST AXONOMETRIC - REDUCED HEIGHT SCHEME C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt SAFEWAY POTENTIAL RETAIL SPACE PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK STAIR/ELEVATOR TO PUBLIC SOUTHEAST AXONOMETRIC - REDUCED HEIGHT SCHEME ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ALONG ALLEY PUBLIC PLAZA 7 SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MASSING VIEWS B-7

24 12/1/2016 2:23:55 PM F E RAMP DOWN SHASTA STREET D C RAMP DOWN RAMP UP B A C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt GARAGE LEVEL 1 PLAN SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 1ST STREET APPROXIMATE TOTALS LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 TOTAL PARK REPLACEMENT TOTAL ' 24' 16' 8' 0' 32' 64' SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION GARAGE LEVEL 1 PLAN G-1

25 12/1/2016 2:23:55 PM F E SHASTA STREET D C RAMP DOWN RAMP UP B A C:\Users\e.bernabe\Documents\ LACI - Central_e.bernabe.rvt GARAGE LEVEL 2 PLAN SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 1ST STREET APPROXIMATE TOTALS LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 TOTAL PARK REPLACEMENT TOTAL ' 24' 16' 8' 0' 32' 64' SAN FRANCISCO T CALIFORNIA F Printing Date PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION GARAGE LEVEL 2 PLAN G-2

26 Commercial Design Review Findings, CD/R3 Design Controls and Downtown Design Guidelines for First Street Section Commercial Design Review Findings In approving applications for design review approval under this chapter, the planning and transportation commission and the city council shall make the following findings: A. The proposal meets the goals, policies and objectives of the general plan and any specific plan, design guidelines and ordinance design criteria adopted for the specific district or area. B. The proposal has architectural integrity and has an appropriate relationship with other structures in the immediate area in terms of height, bulk and design. C. Building mass is articulated to relate to the human scale, both horizontally and vertically. Building elevations have variation and depth, and avoid large blank wall surfaces. Residential or mixed-use residential projects incorporate elements that signal habitation, such as identifiable entrances, stairs, porches, bays and balconies. D. Exterior materials and finishes convey quality, integrity, permanence and durability, and materials are used effectively to define building elements such as base, body, parapets, bays, arcades and structural elements. E. Landscaping is generous and inviting, and landscape and hardscape features are designed to complement the building and parking areas, and to be integrated with the building architecture and the surrounding streetscape. Landscaping includes substantial street tree canopy, either in the public right-of-way or within the project frontage. F. Signage is designed to complement the building architecture in terms of style, materials, colors and proportions. G. Mechanical equipment is screened from public view and the screening is designed to be consistent with the building architecture in form, material and detailing. H. Service, trash and utility areas are screened from public view, or are enclosed in structures that are consistent with the building architecture in materials and detailing. Section Design controls (CD/R3). A. No structure shall be built or altered including exterior changes in color, materials, and signage in the CD/R3 District except upon approval of the city planner or as prescribed in Chapter of this title. B. Reduction of apparent size and bulk: 1. As a general principle, building surfaces should be relieved with a change of wall plane that provides strong shadow and visual interest. 2. Every building over seventy-five (75) feet wide should have its perceived height and bulk reduced by dividing the building mass into smaller-scale components by: ATTACHMENT 3

27 i. A change of plane; ii. A projection or recess; iii. Varying cornice or roof lines; iv. Other similar means. 3. The proportions of building elements, especially those at ground level, should be kept close to human scale by using recesses, courtyards, entries, or outdoor spaces along the perimeter of the building to define the underlying fifty-foot front lot frontage. 4. Rooftop equipment shall be concealed from view and/or integrated within the architecture of the building. 5. Windows should be inset generously from the building wall to create shade and shadow detail; the minimum inset shall be three inches. C. The primary access for all buildings shall be directly to the street. D. Consideration should be given to the relationship of the project and its location in the downtown to the implementation of goals and objectives of the downtown urban design plan, revaluation of design approval shall consider one or more of the following factors: 1. The project location as an entry, edge, or core site; 2. The ability to contribute to the creation of open space on-site or in designated areas; 3. Enhancement of the pedestrian environment through the use of pathways, plantings, trees, paving, benches or other amenities; 4. Building facade improvements including, paint, signage, service areas, windows and other features; 5. On-site or off-site parking improvements; 6. Public or private landscape improvements. E. Opaque, reflective, or dark tinted glass should not be used on the ground floor elevation. With the exception of ground floor residential units, sixty (60) percent of the ground floor elevation should be transparent window surface. F. Courtyards should be partially visible from the street or linked to the street by a clear circulation element such as an open passage or covered arcade. G. Rooftop mechanical, venting, and/or exhausting equipment must be within the height limit and screened architecturally from public view, including views from adjacent buildings located at the same level.

28 Fl RST STREET DISTRICT 5 I - L. r

29 City of Los Altos Downtown Design Guidelines FIRST STREET DISTRICT Owners of properties and businesses in this district should review the guidelines for the Downtown Core District. While projects in this district may be somewhat larger and less retail-oriented than those in the downtown core, they are stilt very much a part of the downtown village, and the village character and scale emphasis underlying those guidelines wilj be expected of new buildings and changes to e x isting properties in this district. The intent of these guidelines and the zoning standards established for this district are summarized in the sidebar to the right. The primary differences between development in this district and the downtown core include: A wider range of uses is a!jowed. Required parking must be provided on-site rather than in common parking district lots or srrucrures. Setbacks are required along all street fronts, and in many cases at the rear of parcels. A 50-foot building module applies, rather than the 25-foot module in rhe downtown core, except for lots located within the CRS Zoning District.* * Pending a Zoning Code change approval by the City Council to extend the CRS zoning into the First Street District.. INTENT FIRST STREET DISTRICT A. Promote the implementation of the Los Altos Downtown Design Plan. 8. Support and enhance the downtown Los Altos village atmosphere. C. Allow latitude for creative design and architectural variety. D. Respect the scale and character of the area immediately surrounding the existing downtown pedestrian district. E. Establish a sense of entry into the downtown. F. Encourage historic preservation for those buildings listed on the city's historic resources inventory. G. Encourage the upgrading of building exteriors, signs, and parking lots. H. Provide for a full range of retail, office, and service uses appropriate to downtown. I. Develop a landscaped strip along the back of properties that abut Foothill Expressway between West Edith Avenue and San Antonio Road. J. Improve the visual appeal and pedestrian orientation of the downtown. K. Encourage the use of solar, photo voltaic, and other energy conserving devices. Applicants should carefully review the Los Altos Zoning Ordinance provisions appropriate lo their properties. Parcels covered by the design guidelines for the first Street District are located within three zoning districts with slightly different limitations and requirements. 5 Adopted December 8,

30 Adopted December 8, FIRST STREET DISTRICT A visual and physical separation between street front sidewalks and adjacent parking lots is expected. 5.1 PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT City of Los Altos Downtown Design Guidelines The First Street Discricr is spread ajong First Street which is more vehicle-oriented than che remainder of Downtown Los Afros, and has more surface parking with limited landscaping than most other areas. Nevertheless, this district is very much a pan of the downtown vill ag e. These guidelines are intended to allow larger buildings and on-site parking while doing so in a manner that reinforces Downtown Los Altos' village scale and character Minimize the visual impact of parking a) Underground or screened roof parking is encouraged on larger parcds. Provide a landscape buffer between street front sidewalks and any adjacent parking lot. Per the zoning code, the minimum width of this buffer must be 5 feet, unless less is allowed by a variance. When lesser widths are allowed for existing parking lot improvements, some buffering is still required. One approach to adding visual buffering by b) a low wall is shown below. Sq,arate parking lots from pedestrian areas at buildi ngs hy landscaping (above) or by pedestrian arcades (below) Provide pedestrian linkages between street front sidewalks and building entries a) Building entries facing First Street are strongly encouraged. For larger buildings where entries are set back on a facade facing a parking lot, provide a strong sidewalk connection with landscaping on both sides from the street front to the entry Provide landscape buffers between parking lots and pedestrian areas at buildings a) Building fronts are expected to be as active and attractive as those in the Downtown Core District, and to be buffered from parked cars. Landscaping and, where appropriate, trees should be used to buffer pedestrian areas. Alternatively, arcades and planters at the building may be used for this purpose. Examples of these two approaches are shown to the left.

31 City of Los Altos Downtown Design Guidelines FIRST STREET DISTRICT Provide special paving for parking lots immediately accessible from the street a) Parking areas which are adjacent to street front sidewalks and with perpendicular parking spaces directly accessible &om the street drive lane are strongly discouraged. For existing parking areas like this that are being upgraded, provide a distinction on the pavi ng color and texture between the parking surface and the adjacent sidewalk and street paving Provide pedestrian walkways through large parking lots a) Dedicated walks through parking lots wuj improve pedestrian safety and enhance the shopping and business patronage experience. Walkways should be reinforced with edge landscaping and with textured and/or permeable paving where they cross parking drive aisles. One example is shown in the upper right of this page Provide pedestrian amenities. Amenities may include: Benches Founcains Planted areas Rain gardens and other rainwacer infiltration features Special decorative paving Potted flowers and plants Public art Waste receptacles Integrate ground floor residential uses with the streetscape Example of a well desigrud pedestrian walk way through a parking lot. Note: 1he building entry in the back gr ound would be out of scale for downtown Los Altos.. Provide pedestrian amenities. a) Set structures back a minimum of IO feet &om the street property line. Stairs and entry porches may encroach into this setback up to the property line. B) Soft landscaping is required for a minimum of 60% of the front setback area. See examples belolll and to the right Provide ground floor residential setback lands cap ing. Adopted December 8,

32 FIRST STREET DISTRICT City of Los Altos Downtown Design Guidelines ARCHITECTURE Building uses and sizes will vary more in the First Street District than elsewhere in the downtown. The goal of these guidelines is co accommodate this wide diversity of size and use while maintaining a village scale and character chat is complementary to the downtown core. The photographs shown on this and the fouowing page are examples of more vehicle-oriented buildings that include forms and details that are sensitive to vijlage scale and character Design to a village scaje and character Ihis shopping complex has a village scale and character by virtue of treating adjacent uses as individual buildings. 7he scale, details and natural materials used far this tower create an attractive focal point far the building without! sing human scale. a) Avoid large box-like structures. b) Break larger buildings into smaller scale elements. c) Provide special design articulation and detail for building facades located adjacent to street frontages. d) Keep focal point elements small in scale. e) Utilize materials that are common in the downtown core. f) Avoid designs that appear to seek to be prominently seen from Foothill Expressway and/or San Antonio Road in favor of designs that focus on First Street, and are a part of the vill age environment. g) Provide substantial small scale details. h) Integrate landscaping into building facades in a manner similar to the Downtown Core District (See pages 28-29). Examples of larger parcel buildings that are designed to be consistent with a vill ag e duracter are shown on this and the adjacent p ag e. Traditional buildi1lg forms, architectural details, and integrated landscaping assist in relating the parking lot frontage to an fjvera!i village scale and character. 68 Adopced December 8, 2009

33 City of Los Altos Downtown Design Guidelines FIRST STREET DISTRICT Design structures to be compatible with adjacent existing buildings a) Buildings adjacent to the Downtown Core District should be desi gn ed in form, material, and details similar to those nearby along Main and State Streets. b) Projects adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods should draw upon residential forms and details to create a smaller grain desi gn fabric that is compatible with the residential buildings. Exampks are shown be l orv and to the right. 5 " Adopted December 8,

34 FIRST STREET DISTRICT City of Los Altos Downtown Design Guidelines landscape Substantial landscaping is expected in the First Street District to ensure that the area becomes a visual pare of the larger downtown village Provide substantial landscaping adjacent to residential neighborhoods landscape Foothill Expressway edges with shrubbery and trees Add substantial landscaping in all parking lots Landscaping between facing parking rows is desirable to break up large expanses of paving. a) Provide landscaping equal to or greater than the requirements set forth in the Los Altos.ZOning Code. b) Tree landscaping should he provided to create an orchard canopy effect in surface parking lots with more than one drive aisle. Utilize landscape fingers placed paralld to the parking spaces to break up expanses of parking lot paving. Space the islands with intervals not exceeding 6 par k ing spaces in length. c) Utilize hedges, trees, and other landscaping between facing parking spaces as shown in the example to the left_ Add street trees along all parcel street frontages 5.4 SIGNAGE The Downtown Core District signage guidelines apply co all signs in the First Street District. Ground signs and freestanding signs may also be allowed ac the discretion of the city (See the guidelines on pages for these two sign types). 70 Adopced December

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23 The following photographs from throughout the country illustrate key urban design principles. Photographs are provided to illustrate the overall urban design concepts described in Chapter 1 of the Downtown

More information

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion Future Five Design/ Development Guidelines January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion 5-Points Design Guidelines Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Area boundaries 4 III. Review Process

More information

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 2 March 9, 2011 Project: Description: Applicant: DSR11-004 The applicant is requesting approval to replace the existing exterior wood framed

More information

-~~ ft' -,,~, PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. Study Session for New Mixed-Use Building at 999 Fremont Avenue

-~~ ft' -,,~, PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. Study Session for New Mixed-Use Building at 999 Fremont Avenue ' -~~ - -. -- --.ft' -,,~, ''. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 17, 2018 Subject: Prepared by: Initiated by: Study Session for New Mixed-Use Building at 999 Fremont Avenue Zachary Dahl,

More information

Walnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines. Part Three III - 25

Walnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines. Part Three III - 25 C. General Design Criteria Part Three DRAFT 0/6/ III - 5 Frontage Types Frontage is a semi-public transition zone at the ground level where public and private realms meet. An understanding of various frontage

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: CC: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: May 21, 2018 Agenda Item: 8-A Grace Page, Senior Planner Stephanie Reich, AIA, LEED

More information

WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS 20.25.080 WATERFRONT DISTRICT A. Purpose. This section is intended to implement The Waterfront District Subarea Plan by: 1. Creating a safe, vibrant mixed-use urban

More information

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development Adopted June 18, 2009 This section of the Design and focuses on site planning and design guidance for new multi-family

More information

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines 4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines The Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan addresses the area between College Avenue and Steele Lane. Mendocino Avenue is a busy arterial that runs parallel

More information

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to: AUGUST 29, 2017 12.15 Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 12.15.1 Goals 12.15.2 Land Use The goals of this Plan are to: 12.15.2.1 General Provisions: a) Ensure the development of a compact

More information

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS INITIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES for CENTERS AND CORRIDORS City of Spokane Planning Services Third Floor, City Hall 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd. Spokane, WA 99201-3329 (509) 625-6300 www.spokaneplanning.org

More information

PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS 20.25 DESIGN REVIEW. 20.25.080 WATERFRONT DISTRICT A. Purpose. This section is intended to implement The Waterfront District Subarea Plan by: 1. Creating a

More information

13. New Construction. Context & Character

13. New Construction. Context & Character 13. New Construction Context & Character While historic districts convey a sense of time and place which is retained through the preservation of historic buildings and relationships, these areas continue

More information

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity. 6-22 Community Design Street Walls and Street-front Setbacks The siting of buildings will play a critical role in establishing the character and sense of place for the District. Siting buildings at the

More information

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon 4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre 4.0 Design Guidelines for the Village Centre The Village Centre is the focal point of the entire South Fields Community and is designed as a traditional commercial

More information

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST Section 1.0 General Strategies 1.1 DESIGN EXCELLENCE: ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY AND INNOVATIVE DESIGN OF NEW BUILDINGS WITHIN THE WEST LOOP WITHOUT BEING PRESCRIPTIVE

More information

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project DEVELOPER: SIGNATURE PROPERTIES ARCHITECT: HKIT ARCHITECTS April 23, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Vision 4 Description of Site 5 Guiding Concepts 6

More information

SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA

SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA 1 SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA Downtown Bozeman should be the location of buildings of greatest height and intensity in the community. The following guidelines apply

More information

SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation

SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS ILLUSTRATED WORKING FOR TEST IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW SMALL LOT CODE AMENDMENT & POLICY UPDATE

More information

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY This section provides design guidelines for improvements in the public right-of-way. The public right-of-way refers to streets, sidewalks, non-vehicular thoroughfares, parks and greenways

More information

Design Guidelines. Roosevelt. Mike Podowski DPD Design Guidelines Ordinance ATT 13 August 13, 2012 Version #1

Design Guidelines. Roosevelt. Mike Podowski DPD Design Guidelines Ordinance ATT 13 August 13, 2012 Version #1 Roosevelt Design Guidelines The Roosevelt Neighborhood Design Guidelines apply within the Neighborhood Boundary. Map 1 2 Map 2 3 Map 3 4 CS1 Natural Systems and Site Features Citywide Guideline: Use natural

More information

B. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks

B. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks B. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks Figure IV.4 A rational block pattern with connected streets Introduction The single most important element in the physical and functional integration of mixed use

More information

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT Chapter 11-17 PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT Sections: 11-17-01 GENERAL PURPOSE 11-17-02 PERMITTED BUILDING TYPES 11-17-03 USES PERMITTED WITH DESIGN REVIEW 11-17-04 USES PERMITTED BY CONDITIONAL

More information

Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines

Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines guidelines for New construction projects and major alterations IN the bayshore boulevard home improvement special use DISTRICT SAN FRANCISCO

More information

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center The Town Center Vision is scattered throughout the Comprehensive Plan, development code and the 1994 Town Center Plan. What follows are sections

More information

City of Redlands Architectural Guidelines for Non-Residential Development

City of Redlands Architectural Guidelines for Non-Residential Development 14. Building articulation shall be included in the design of building, in order to create a formal entry statement. Avoid this Do this Page 11 15. Give special attention to creating pedestrian scale and

More information

Building and Site Design Standards

Building and Site Design Standards Commercial Design Standards All Business and Industrial Uses as Described in Section 2234 Requiring Special Permit Review Except Large-Scale Ground Mounted Solar Photovoltaic Installations and Wireless

More information

City of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods

City of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods City of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods DRAFT - September 2016 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Policy Context 3 3. Characteristics

More information

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN The Village SPECIFIC PLAN Chapter 3 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3.1.1 Purpose This Chapter describes the development regulations applicable to the Mixed-Use and Transit Center Planning Areas. These form-based regulations

More information

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 SITE DESIGN Purpose 1 CHAPTER 2 SITE DESIGN Streetscape

More information

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines Highland Village Green Design Guidelines Publishing Information Title Highland Village Green Design Guidelins Author The City of Calgary Status DRAFT - Proposed document subject to changes Additional Copies

More information

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines This section provides overall design principles and guidelines for the Gardnerville Mixed-use Overlay. They provide criteria for mixed-use places consisting of residential,

More information

Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)

Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU) 18.28.500 Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU) The Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU) are intended to help implement the land use goals and strategies found in the Golden Vision 2030 values,

More information

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: AUGUST 2, 2017 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Imboden and Members of the Design Review Committee Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director

More information

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses CHAPTER 3 Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Section Number Title Ordinance Number Date of Ordinance 16-3-1 Applicability 2006-11 2008-04 07-01-08 16-3-2 Uniform Standards for Architectural Design

More information

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4 . General Purpose (DC) Direct Development Control Provision DC Area 4 The purpose of this Provision is to provide for an area of commercial office employment and residential development in support of the

More information

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space % OF CHARLOTTE IS CATEGORIZED AS A. LAND USES : Placeholder map displaying location of Place Type GOALS: Accommodate XX% of future growth. Provide a concentration of primarily commercial and civic activity

More information

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted by Council, 2006 WINDSOR GLEN REDEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES August 2006 1.0 Master Plan Organization For this area of the Coquitlam Town Centre, a mix of high,

More information

Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials

Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property incompatible fencing materials garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park Lack of plantings as a buffer between private property and open

More information

Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s

Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s Downtown Ann Arbor Design Guidelines Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s This chapter presents general design guidelines for new site plan or PUD projects in downtown Ann Arbor. The

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: February 3, 2014 Agenda Item: 7.9 To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Scott Albright,

More information

Chapter 11. Industrial Design Guidelines 11.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 11.3 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES 11.2 GENERAL DESIGN OBJECTIVES

Chapter 11. Industrial Design Guidelines 11.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 11.3 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES 11.2 GENERAL DESIGN OBJECTIVES Chapter 11 Industrial Design Guidelines 11.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The following industrial/design guidelines seek to assure high quality development in Santa Ana s industrial districts by: The design

More information

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE March, 2014 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FREEWAY/TOURIST DESIGN STANDARDS March, 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...1 Design Site Design

More information

Community Design Plan

Community Design Plan Gardena General Plan 2006 Authority While the is not a required element of a General Plan, it is included because improving the community appearance and image is paramount to the overall quality of life

More information

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable

More information

Greater East Wenatchee Urban Growth Area. Design Standards & Guidelines

Greater East Wenatchee Urban Growth Area. Design Standards & Guidelines Greater East Wenatchee Urban Growth Area Design Standards & Guidelines November 30, 2006 Table of Contents General Guidelines for All Development Site Design - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More information

September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA

September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403-1388 RE: Station Park Green Dear

More information

DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT

DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT 6.01. GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Site Planning B. Architectural Design C. Medical Facility Signage & Lighting D. Exhibit 48. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONCEPTS 6.02. MEDICAL FACILITY STANDARDS & GUIDELINES

More information

SEAPINES STATION DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH MARCH 2017

SEAPINES STATION DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH MARCH 2017 SEAPINES STATION DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH MARCH 2017 CONTENTS DEFINITIONS... 2 BACKGROUND & PURPOSE... 3 LOCATION... 3 RECOMMENDED BUILDING PLACEMENT & SETBACKS... 5 RECOMMENDED CONCEPTS

More information

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN AN ORDINANCE creating new Section 33.02(14) and renumbering current Section 33.02(14) to Section 33.02(15) of the Madison General Ordinances to establish Urban Design District

More information

general corridor design guidelines gen-0.0

general corridor design guidelines gen-0.0 general corridor design guidelines gen-0.0 facades gen-1.0 GEN-1.1: TRANSPARENCY GEN-1.1.1: WALL OPENINGS In order to create buildings that are visually interesting for passers-by, blank ground floor

More information

PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BLOCK C OF THE MT. DIABLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Adopted by Design Review Commission February 4, 2004

PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BLOCK C OF THE MT. DIABLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Adopted by Design Review Commission February 4, 2004 PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BLOCK C OF THE MT. DIABLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Adopted by Design Review Commission February 4, 2004 The Walnut Creek Redevelopment Agency has an adopted plan for

More information

Commercial Development Permit Area

Commercial Development Permit Area City of Kamloops KAMPLAN Commercial Development Permit Area PURPOSE The purpose of this Development Permit Area (DPA) is to establish objectives and provide guidelines for the form and character of commercial

More information

ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES ......... ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES LAGUNA RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN... June 2008 ............ DESIGN GUIDELINES Table of Contents Contents Section A: Town Center Overview...1 A.1. Purpose and

More information

APPENDIX A BIG BOX RETAIL DESIGN STANDARDS

APPENDIX A BIG BOX RETAIL DESIGN STANDARDS APPENDIX A BIG BOX RETAIL DESIGN STANDARDS I. Procedure The following guidelines are intended to be used as a design aid by developers proposing large retail developments and as an evaluation tool by the

More information

Planning Board Briefing

Planning Board Briefing Planning Board Briefing Why Now? The Sector Plan Implementation Chapter States: Before Stage 1 begins, the following must occur: Approval of the Sectional Map Amendment. Approval of the Greater Lyttonsville

More information

appendix and street interface guidelines

appendix and street interface guidelines appendix five: building and street interface guidelines appendix 5 building and street interface guidelines BOULEVARDS Boulevards are generally characterized by higher levels of traffic movement at higher

More information

Clairtrell Area Context Plan

Clairtrell Area Context Plan Clairtrell Area Context Plan March 2005 Urban Development Services City Planning Contents 1. Introduction... 4 2. Development Structure... 6 2.1 Streets... 7 2.1.1 Sheppard Avenue and Bayview Avenue...

More information

MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES In addition to the development regulations contained in the Mixed-Use Zoning District, design guidelines are presented here to provide an added level of definition

More information

AMITY STATION Revised Concept Plan Review West Rosemary Street Chapel Hill, NC September 27, 2016

AMITY STATION Revised Concept Plan Review West Rosemary Street Chapel Hill, NC September 27, 2016 AMITY STATION Revised Concept Plan Review West Rosemary Street Chapel Hill, NC September 27, 2016 DEVELOPER'S PROGRAM Introduction This is a request for review of a Revised Concept Plan by Chapel Hill

More information

Study Session for a New Mixed-Use Development at 389 First Street

Study Session for a New Mixed-Use Development at 389 First Street DATE: November 2, 2017 STUDY SESSION TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Planning Conunission Steve Golden, Senior Planner Study Session for a New Mixed-Use Development at 389 First Street RECOMMENDATION Provide design

More information

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO)

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO) TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Community Development Department SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 260-400 E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO) RECOMMENDATION:

More information

CITY OF FARGO PARKING RAMP SITE EVALUATION

CITY OF FARGO PARKING RAMP SITE EVALUATION CITY OF FARGO PARKING RAMP SITE EVALUATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Helenske Design Group (architect) and Carl Walker Inc (Parking Consultant) were retained by the City of Fargo to complete a downtown parking

More information

Division VI Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards

Division VI Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards Division VI 18.40.800 Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards 18.40.810 Guidelines The goals of the Comprehensive Plan include a focus on pedestrian safety, amenities and aesthetics

More information

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES IHZ Booklet #7 May 6, 2010 DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES CANTERBURY 7 Overview During the recent planning process for the Plan of Conservation and Development community character was identified as an important

More information

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

Infill Residential Design Guidelines Infill Residential Design Guidelines Adopted March 23, 2004 Amended September 10, 2013 City of Orange Community Development Department Planning Division Phone: (714) 744-7220 Fax: (714) 744-7222 www.cityoforange.org

More information

ZONING. 300 Attachment 1. City of Oneonta. Design Guidelines ( )

ZONING. 300 Attachment 1. City of Oneonta. Design Guidelines ( ) 300 Attachment 1 City of Oneonta Design Guidelines ( 300-68) A. Site Organization. These guidelines address issues related to both building and parking location. Other issues include vehicle access (curb

More information

ATTACHMENT A. SILVERDALE DESIGN STANDARDS Amendments to the Waaga Way Town Center Chapter

ATTACHMENT A. SILVERDALE DESIGN STANDARDS Amendments to the Waaga Way Town Center Chapter ATTACHMENT A SILVERDALE DESIGN STANDARDS Amendments to the Waaga Way Town Center Chapter Chapter 10. Waaga Way Town Center 10.1 Physical Identity Elements & Opportunities The Waaga Way Town Center includes

More information

Urban Design Guidelines Townhouse and Apartment Built Form

Urban Design Guidelines Townhouse and Apartment Built Form Urban Design Guidelines Townhouse and Apartment Built Form Town of Wasaga Beach Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Purpose 1.2. Urban Design Principles 1.3. Application of Guidelines 2. Site Design,

More information

R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist

R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for

More information

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines 5. Community Core Guidelines Development of the Community Core will take place by plan of subdivision and site plan approval. It will occur in a phased manner that will reflect the timing of residential

More information

PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE

PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE Zero Canal Plaza Development 0 Canal Plaza 2016-162 Cow Plaza 1, LLC Submitted to: Portland Planning Board Date: August 4, 2016 Public Hearing Date: August 9, 2016

More information

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Planning Effort Summary In July, 2010 Commissioner Frank Mann invited the Lehigh Acres community to start discussing how to achieve their recently adopted community

More information

Design Guidelines Checklist

Design Guidelines Checklist Design Guidelines Checklist A quick reference to the City of Vista Design Guidelines City of Vista Community Development Department Planning Division 600 Eucalyptus Avenue Vista, CA 92084 760.639.6100

More information

5.7 Design Criteria for the Private Realm Organization of Private Realm Design Standards and Guidelines Guidelines vs.

5.7 Design Criteria for the Private Realm Organization of Private Realm Design Standards and Guidelines Guidelines vs. 5.7 Design Criteria for the Private Realm The Private Realm (shown in Exhibit 5.7a) includes the privately owned property not included in the Setback Realm described in the previous section. It encompasses

More information

3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW

3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW Urban Design 3.0 URBAN DESIGN December 6, 2007 3.1 OVERVIEW The highly urban character of Easton Place is defined by the overall design of the community. The following sections provide an overview of the

More information

Bel-Air Lexus Automobile Service Station

Bel-Air Lexus Automobile Service Station Bel-Air Lexus Automobile Service Station Design Brief 443-447 McArthur Avenue Ottawa April 30, 2015 14-1299-MCA Site Details Application: Site Plan Control Legal Description and Municipal Addresses: 443

More information

The broad range of permitted and special uses allowed in the district remain, but some descriptions have been clarified.

The broad range of permitted and special uses allowed in the district remain, but some descriptions have been clarified. Memorandum To: Emily Fultz, AICP City Planner, City of Edwardsville From: Michael Blue, FAICP Principal, Teska Associates Date: January 24, 2019 RE: B-1 Zoning District Update A draft, updated B-1 Central

More information

East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood

East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood Northridge Property Management Urban Design Brief 3195 East Bayshore Road City of Owen Sound January 2016 East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood Northridge Property Management

More information

Chapter 4: Jordan Road Character District

Chapter 4: Jordan Road Character District 4: Jordan Road Character District 4.1 Introduction The Jordan Road character district encompasses much of the former Jordan orchard and farmstead, which was a significant part of Sedona s history. The

More information

LITTLETON CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

LITTLETON CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES LITTLETON CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES Littleton Center Design Guidelines 1 I. DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS These Design Guidelines have been initially created by Hallin Family LLC (the "Developer"), and govern all

More information

Residential Design Guidelines

Residential Design Guidelines Residential Design Guidelines Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines Introduction These guidelines seek to provide property owners, designers and developers with a clear understanding of the City

More information

Prepared by: LCT Design Group, LLC 401 North Franklin Street, Suite 5S Chicago, Illinois 60610

Prepared by: LCT Design Group, LLC 401 North Franklin Street, Suite 5S Chicago, Illinois 60610 Prepared by: LCT Design Group, LLC 401 North Franklin Street, Suite 5S Chicago, Illinois 60610 Existing Conditions Residential Guidelines Future Land Use -East Study Area - West Study Area Existing Conditions

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 23, 2004 DATE: October 6, 2004 SUBJECT: SP #106-3 Site Plan Amendment for changes to façade, plaza deck, landscaping, number of units,

More information

INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES

INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES INTRODUCTION Community institutions are an important part of the character and vitality of neighborhoods in Forsyth County. Institutional uses include

More information

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004 City of Farmington Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004 Introduction Planning Background 1 Scope and Components of the Plan Amendment 2 Concept Introduction 3 Plan Concepts 3 Conceptual

More information

lot flankage Y street 16m 6m landscape strip for large site 3m landscape strip for small medium site

lot flankage Y street 16m 6m landscape strip for large site 3m landscape strip for small medium site Commercial General Commercial Objectives Create developments compatible with adjacent land uses in scale, function and character Define a consistent and attractive street edge with quality landscaping,

More information

shown on the following page.

shown on the following page. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN May 5, 2016 Ms. Tricia Schimpp Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403-1388 RE: Hillsdale Terrace Dear Tricia:

More information

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER') TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Community Development Department SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

More information

chapter DESIGN GUIDELINES NEW RIVER MASTER PLAN REPORT

chapter DESIGN GUIDELINES NEW RIVER MASTER PLAN REPORT chapter DESIGN GUIDELINES NEW RIVER MASTER PLAN REPORT .76 DESIGN GUIDELINES An Overview design guidelines NEW RIVER MASTER PLAN Design Guidelines can transform the image of a city. Specific, design-based

More information

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES Sec. 33.24(14) (14) Urban Design District No. 7. (a) Statement of Purpose. Urban Design District No. 7 is hereby established to improve the appearance and function of Park Street. Park Street is a major

More information

COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION

COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION INTRODUCTION These guidelines were prepared in response to the needs of many users: developers, property owners, architects,

More information

SIMPLOT OFFICE BUILDING

SIMPLOT OFFICE BUILDING SIMPLOT OFFICE BUILDING 1) Urban Context and conformance with the River Myrtle Masterplan The proposed project is part of a larger development on the block between 9th and 11th, and Myrtle and Front Street.By

More information

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2015 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair McCormick and Members of the Design Review Committee Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Kelly Christensen

More information

AMEND DMENT H HOSPITAL

AMEND DMENT H HOSPITAL AMEND DMENT TO LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD MASTER PLAN H HOSPITAL ZONE DISTRICT Village of Ridgewood Planning Board February 28, 2014with technical revisions from June 9, 2014 Planning Board

More information

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission SYNOPSIS / APPLICATION INFORMATION Application Request: Concept review on a legislative application to rezone land located at approximately 1750

More information

D. Landscape Design. 1. Coverage Intent: To provide adequate landscaping materials that enhance the appearance of development projects.

D. Landscape Design. 1. Coverage Intent: To provide adequate landscaping materials that enhance the appearance of development projects. D. Landscape Design The standards and guidelines in this section give design guidance for the landscaping components of industrial and office projects. City regulations require that all landscaping be

More information

TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF. August, MOUNTLAKE TERRACE TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS August,

TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF. August, MOUNTLAKE TERRACE TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS August, TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE August, 2008 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS August, 2008 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...3 Design Site Design...4 Pedestrian

More information

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018 URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018 DESIGN BRIEF CONTENTS PART A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 DESCRIPTION & ANALYSIS OF SITE CONTEXT 3.0 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES

More information

COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS

COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT (DEVELOPMENTS MORE THAN 25,000 SQUARE FEET) 8/15/2018 DRAFT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BLACKFOOT, IDAHO, PROVIDING FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR

More information