CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE
|
|
|
- Jemima Gilmore
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Wayf inding and Signage DISCLAIMER: The following presentation represents in-progress work generated to test various elements of the ongoing campus planning effort along with stimulating discussion and feedback amongst the Focus Group participants. The graphics do not represent proposed or approved projects and are intended only to illustrate, for discussion purposes, how elements of the campus master plan could potentially be implemented. 01 September 2016
2 AGENDA Design & Location Criteria Key Destination Nomenclature Sample Trips Schematic Design Concepts Next Steps DISCLAIMER: The following presentation represents in-progress work generated to test various elements of the ongoing campus planning effort along with stimulating discussion and feedback amongst the Focus Group participants. The graphics do not represent proposed or approved projects and are intended only to illustrate, for discussion purposes, how elements of the campus master plan could potentially be implemented.
3 DESIGN & LOCATION CRITERIA DISCLAIMER: The following presentation represents in-progress work generated to test various elements of the ongoing campus planning effort along with stimulating discussion and feedback amongst the Focus Group participants. The graphics do not represent proposed or approved projects and are intended only to illustrate, for discussion purposes, how elements of the campus master plan could potentially be implemented.
4 Location Criteria Right side of each drive lane in unobstructed locations Announce turns prior to intersections by a safe margin at driving speed Programmed with the first-time visitor in mind Direct drivers to Parking Areas Perpendicular to travel lane Min. 3-0 from curb to edge of sign DISCLAIMER: The graphic is for illustrative and discussion purposes only and does not represent a proposed or approved design. The intent of the graphic is solely to test potential criteria: Vehicular Directional Signs Design Criteria Text and symbols shall be internally illuminated on primary and secondary signs Text and symbols shall be reflective on smaller sign type (trailblazer) Destinations listed left, right, and straight ahead No more than 6 lines of text (primary) Copy heights as indicated in Graphic Details
5 criteria: Parking Lot Identification Signs Design Criteria Text and symbols shall be reflective Clearly identifies lot number at entrances Indicates parking usage and hours Identifies if accessible parking is available Sign is double-sided Copy heights as indicated in Graphic Details Location Criteria Located at lot entrances Perpendicular to travel lane served by lot (with individual exceptions as required by site conditions) Min. 3-0 from curb to edge of sign Located as not to disrupt motorists sight lines
6 criteria: Pedestrian Map Kiosks Design Criteria Changeable campus map accessible via hinged access door Scaled for pedestrian viewing and accessible for ambulatory and wheelchair viewing May include information for access to online wayfinding tools May be double-sided if conditions allow Location Criteria Located at transitions from vehicular to pedestrian navigation such as parking lots, pedestrian drop-offs and bus stops Located in areas of heavy pedestrian traffic and merging paths
7 criteria: Pedestrian Directional Signs Design Criteria Navigational aid to Key Destinations and Parking Areas Delivers adequate information to direct users to the next sign or kiosk Destinations listed left, right, and straight ahead No more than 10 lines of text Destinations based on proximity Location Criteria Judiciously placed along pedestrian paths Placed at major pedestrian decision points Oriented perpendicular to path of travel (with some exceptions as required by site conditions) May be double-sided
8 criteria: Building Identification Signs Design Criteria Displays the full building name Key Destination ID signs may display up to three University-approved Key Destinations located within the building Freestanding signs are single or double-sided depending on site requirements Includes placeholder for accessible route messaging Location Criteria Placed at primary and secondary entrances of each building
9 criteria: Mobility Considerations Things to consider for individuals with mobility and visual needs: Paths have varied conditions: slopes, steps, crosswalks, curbs Paths have varied surfaces: cobbles, brick, concrete, asphalt, gravel Visual and physical cues become landmarks: water features, wind chimes, open spaces, etc. Consistent messaging and placement is critical
10 criteria: Mobility Considerations To an individual with mobility needs, this is the best condition. Wide open spaces flat and level.
11 criteria: Mobility Considerations To an individual with visual needs, this is the worst condition. Wide open spaces no memory cues, no reference points.
12 KEY DESTINATION NOMENCLATURE DISCLAIMER: The following presentation represents in-progress work generated to test various elements of the ongoing campus planning effort along with stimulating discussion and feedback amongst the Focus Group participants. The graphics do not represent proposed or approved projects and are intended only to illustrate, for discussion purposes, how elements of the campus master plan could potentially be implemented.
13 content: Nomenclature Discussion Vehicular Directional Signage Visitor Parking Garages / Lots Limited Key Destinations w/ direct vehicular access ex. George Bush Library Abbreviations as required (sign size limitations)
14 content: Nomenclature Discussion Vehicular Directional Signage Visitor Parking Garages / Lots Limited Key Destinations w/ direct vehicular access ex. George Bush Library Abbreviations as required (sign size limitations) Potential Destinations University Center Garage West Campus Garage Central Campus Garage Northside Garage Lot 51 (adjacent to Emerging Technologies Building) Lot 72 (adjacent to West Campus Library) George Bush Library DISCLAIMER: The graphic is for illustrative and discussion purposes only and does not represent a proposed or approved design. The intent of the graphic is solely to test potential
15 content: Nomenclature Discussion Pedestrian Directional Signage Visitor Parking Garages / Lots Expanded Key Destinations Abbreviations as required (sign size limitations)
16 content: Nomenclature Discussion Pedestrian Directional Signage Visitor Parking Garages / Lots Expanded Key Destinations Abbreviations as required (sign size limitations) Potential Destinations Academic Plaza Bonfire Memorial Clayton W. Williams, Jr. Alumni Center Cushing Library & Archives Evans Library General Services Complex (GSC) George Bush Presidential Library Koldus Building Memorial Student Center (MSC) Military Walk The Quad Reed Arena Rudder Tower Sanders Corps Center Student Recreation Center West Campus Library Williams Administration Building DISCLAIMER: The graphic is for illustrative and discussion purposes only and does not represent a proposed or approved design. The intent of the graphic is solely to test potential
17 content: Nomenclature Discussion Pedestrian Map Kiosk Includes Map Artwork Expanded Key Destinations Full Building Names
18 content: Nomenclature Discussion Building Identification Signage Full Building Names Building Abbreviation Accessible Route Optional Address Building # Internal Key Destinations
19 SAMPLE TRIPS DISCLAIMER: The following presentation represents in-progress work generated to test various elements of the ongoing campus planning effort along with stimulating discussion and feedback amongst the Focus Group participants. The graphics do not represent proposed or approved projects and are intended only to illustrate, for discussion purposes, how elements of the campus master plan could potentially be implemented.
20 trips: Sample Trip #1 Evans Library
21 trips: Sample Trip #1 Evans Library Visitor Parking P5 Evans Library
22 trips: Sample Trip #1 Evans Library Visitor Parking P5 Evans Library
23 trips: Sample Trip #1 Evans Library Visitor Parking P5 Evans Library
24 trips: Sample Trip #1 Evans Library Visitor Parking P5 Evans Library
25 trips: Sample Trip #1 Evans Library Visitor Parking P5 Evans Library
26 trips: Sample Trip #2 West Campus Library
27 trips: Sample Trip #2 West Campus Library West Campus Library Visitor Parking P2
28 trips: Sample Trip #2 West Campus Library West Campus Library Visitor Parking P2
29 trips: Sample Trip #2 West Campus Library West Campus Library Visitor Parking P2
30 trips: Sample Trip #2 West Campus Library West Campus Library Visitor Parking P2
31 trips: Sample Trip #2 West Campus Library West Campus Library Visitor Parking P2
32 trips: Sample Trip #2 West Campus Library West Campus Library Visitor Parking P2
33 trips: Sample Trip #2 West Campus Library West Campus Library Visitor Parking P2
34 SCHEMATIC DESIGN CONCEPTS DISCLAIMER: The following presentation represents in-progress work generated to test various elements of the ongoing campus planning effort along with stimulating discussion and feedback amongst the Focus Group participants. The graphics do not represent proposed or approved projects and are intended only to illustrate, for discussion purposes, how elements of the campus master plan could potentially be implemented.
35 concepts: Focus Group Survey Results Please select the DESIGN STYLE you feel best visually represents Texas A&M University. Contemporary Modern Hybrid Traditional Contemporary 17% Modern 3% Hybrid 35% Traditional 45%
36 concepts: Focus Group Survey Results Please select the PHYSICAL FORM you feel best visually represents Texas A&M University. Multidimensional Double Pole Single Pole Monolithic/Vertical Multidimensional 19% Double Pole 41% Single Pole 6% Monolithic/Vertical 34%
37 concepts: Focus Group Survey Results Please select the TYPOGRAPHY you feel best visually represents Texas A&M University. San Serif (with lowercase) Serif (with lowercase) San Serif (All CAPS) Serif (ALL CAPS) San Serif (with lowercase) 62% Serif (with lowercase) 13% San Serif (All CAPS) 16% Serif (ALL CAPS) 9% DISCLAIMER: The graphic is for illustrative and discussion purposes only and does not represent a proposed or approved design. The intent of the graphic is solely to test potential
38 concepts: TAMU Color Palette
39 concepts: Hierarchy Schematic Design Sign Types Primary Vehicular Directional Parking Lot Identity Pedestrian Directional Pedestrian Building Identity
40 DISCLAIMER: The following presentation represents in-progress work generated to test various elements of the ongoing campus planning effort along with stimulating discussion and feedback amongst the Focus Group participants. The graphics do not represent proposed or approved projects and are intended only to illustrate, for discussion purposes, how elements of the campus master plan could potentially be implemented.
41 concepts: Scenario 01
42 concepts: Scenario 01
43 concepts: Scenario 01 Alternate Color
44 concepts: Scenario 01 Alternate Color
45 DISCLAIMER: The following presentation represents in-progress work generated to test various elements of the ongoing campus planning effort along with stimulating discussion and feedback amongst the Focus Group participants. The graphics do not represent proposed or approved projects and are intended only to illustrate, for discussion purposes, how elements of the campus master plan could potentially be implemented.
46 concepts: Scenario 02
47 concepts: Scenario 02
48 concepts: Scenario 02 Alternate Edge Detail
49 concepts: Scenario 02 Alternate Color
50 concepts: Scenario 02 Alternate Color
51 DISCLAIMER: The following presentation represents in-progress work generated to test various elements of the ongoing campus planning effort along with stimulating discussion and feedback amongst the Focus Group participants. The graphics do not represent proposed or approved projects and are intended only to illustrate, for discussion purposes, how elements of the campus master plan could potentially be implemented.
52 concepts: Scenario 03
53 concepts: Scenario 03
54 DISCLAIMER: The following presentation represents in-progress work generated to test various elements of the ongoing campus planning effort along with stimulating discussion and feedback amongst the Focus Group participants. The graphics do not represent proposed or approved projects and are intended only to illustrate, for discussion purposes, how elements of the campus master plan could potentially be implemented.
55 concepts: Scenario 04
56 concepts: Scenario 04
57 concepts: Scenario 04 Alternate Detail
58 concepts: Scenario Comparison SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 3 SCHEME 1 alt. SCHEME 2 alt. SCHEME 4
59 NEXT STEPS DISCLAIMER: The following presentation represents in-progress work generated to test various elements of the ongoing campus planning effort along with stimulating discussion and feedback amongst the Focus Group participants. The graphics do not represent proposed or approved projects and are intended only to illustrate, for discussion purposes, how elements of the campus master plan could potentially be implemented.
60 next: Schedule Upcoming Milestones: 07 Oct: 1 st Draft of Master Plan Update 13 Oct: Campus Open Houses 14 Oct: Joint Focus Group Session 31 Oct: 2 nd Draft of Master Plan Update 02 Nov: Council of Deans 08 Nov: Council on the Built Environment 10 Nov: Executive Committee 15 Dec: Final Draft of Master Plan Update
61 Thank You! DISCLAIMER: The following presentation represents in-progress work generated to test various elements of the ongoing campus planning effort along with stimulating discussion and feedback amongst the Focus Group participants. The graphics do not represent proposed or approved projects and are intended only to illustrate, for discussion purposes, how elements of the campus master plan could potentially be implemented. 01 September 2016
CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE
CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Preser vation and Adaptive Reuse DISCLAIMER: The following presentation represents in-progress work generated to test various elements of the ongoing campus planning effort along
Sign System Recommendations
4.1 Sign System Recommendations 4.2 Recommended sign types required for a complete wayfinding system on the TCNJ campus are described below. Detailed sign messages and their typical locations are included
18 May 2016 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE
18 May 2016 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE Council of the Deans ( Over view) AGENDA Engagement & What We Heard Focus Elements: 1. Development Framework Plan 2. Campus Mobility 3. Campus Guidelines 4. Wayfinding
CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE
19 MAY 2016 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE Metropolitan Planning Organization AGENDA Introductions Planning Scope Observation & Analysis: Mobility Systems Campus Development Plan Mobility Planning Scenarios
Campus Sign Plan. Adopted by the Campus Planning Committee Adopted: June 26, 2006 Revised: April 14, 2016
Campus Sign Plan Adopted by the Campus Planning Committee Adopted: June 26, 2006 Revised: April 14, 2016 INTRODUCTION Oregon State University requires an effective system of visual communication that projects
UAA School of Engineering Parking Garage Master Plan Amendment. 1. Purpose
UAA School of Engineering Parking Garage Master Plan Amendment 1. Purpose Since the UAA campus master plan was drafted in 2003, adopted in 2004, and amended in 2009 a number of significant changes regarding
FRONT STREET STREETSCAPE
FRONT STREET STREETSCAPE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT UPDATE & MARTIN PLAZA ALTERNATIVE REVIEW JUNE 26, 2017 PREPARED BY DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REVISIONS REVISIONS APPLIED AFTER 4/24/2017 COUNCIL PRESENTATION 1. Lane
11 February CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Design Guidelines
11 February 2016 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Design Guidelines AGENDA Introductions Planning Scope The 2004 Campus Plan Observations Design Guidelines - 2004 Plan SWOT Exercise Analysis Goals
CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE
13 April 2016 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group Landscape AGENDA What We Heard Review of Campus Observations & Analysis Campus Framework & Open Space Network Table-Top Exercise Landscape Guideline
C a m p u s I d e n t i t y
Campus Identity Campus Identity a) Landscape Guidelines i. Materials ii. Components iii. Composition b) Wayfinding i) Entrance Features ii) Vehicular iii) Pedestrian c) Focus Areas i) Green Spine ii) Warriner
The Capital Design Advisory Committee St. Mary s College of Maryland & Historic St. Mary s City
The Capital Design Advisory Committee St. Mary s College of Maryland & Historic St. Mary s City Welcome April 21, 2010 Capital Design Advisory Presentation: Relocating Margaret Brent Hall Traffic Calming
12 February CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Wayfinding & Signage
12 February 2016 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Wayfinding & Signage AGENDA Introductions Planning Scope The 2004 Campus Plan Observations SWOT Exercise Analysis Goals and Advice Questions & Discussion
WAYFINDING & SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINE
WAYFINDING & SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINE Introduction The purpose of developing an exterior signage and wayfinding design guide is to better promote the Pittsburg State University brand and to enhance the
EXISTING CONDITIONS 41. Existing Conditions
EXISTING CONDITIONS 41 Existing Conditions The Existing Analysis phase of the planning process involved a study of the existing conditions on the campus in order to identify key planning issues to be addressed
V. Gateways GATEWAYS / V-1
V. GATEWAYS / V-1 Many of Chesapeake s gateways are located on highways and call for bold and attractive designs that motorists can understand, appreciate, and enjoy. can also take the form of natural
11 February CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Research Park
11 February 2016 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Research Park AGENDA Introductions Planning Scope The 2004 Campus Plan Observations SWOT Exercise Analysis Goals and Advice Questions & Discussion
LOS ANGELES MISSION COLLEGE MASTER PLAN Master Plan DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES
LOS ANGELES MISSION COLLEGE MASTER PLAN DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES 34 Quality Learning Along the Arroyo PROGRAM SUMMARY BY PROJECT The following are program summaries for each of the projects planned
10 February CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Landscape & Hensel Park
10 February 2016 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Landscape & Hensel Park AGENDA Introductions Planning Scope The 2004 Campus Plan & Survey Observations 2004 Landscape Plan SWOT Exercise Analysis
Rt 29 Solutions Hydraulic Planning Advisory Panel. September 28, 2017
Hydraulic Planning Advisory Panel September 28, 2017 Agenda Item 1: Introductions Hydraulic Planning Advisory Panel members Technical Team members 2 Agenda item 2: Public Interaction and Feedback Live
Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.
Lakewood s Comprehensive Plan recognizes that transportation helps shape the community, and that the way the community provides for the safe and efficient movement of people affects the character of the
EXISTING VEHICULAR & PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
46 EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING VEHICULAR & PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION Vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns are illustrated on this graphic. Campus entry points and major vehicular circulation routes
This is the East Carolina University Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Final Draft Plan Review. This workbook reviews the campus draft master plan
This is the East Carolina University Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Final Draft Plan Review. This workbook reviews the campus draft master plan first presented on campus on June 29 and June 30, 2011.
Preci nct P l ans Figure 56 Campus Aerial Photo, 2008 CAL STATE EAST BAY, HAYWARD CAMPUS MASTER PLAN
9 Precinct Plans This section contains a detailed discussion of the planning and design concepts for specific areas or precincts of the Cal State East Bay Hayward campus. The Precinct Plans pertain to
DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT
6.01. GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Site Planning B. Architectural Design C. Medical Facility Signage & Lighting D. Exhibit 48. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONCEPTS 6.02. MEDICAL FACILITY STANDARDS & GUIDELINES
UCSF Parnassus Heights Re-Envisioning Process
UCSF Parnassus Heights Re-Envisioning Process Community Working Group Meeting #5 February 27, 2019 Agenda Welcome, Introductions, Agenda Overview, and Review of Last Meeting Summary of Community Ideas
The program was developed with the active participation of a sign committee representing a cross-section of stakeholder groups on campus, including:
AUBURN UNIVERSITY FEBRUARY 3, 2009 The Auburn University Sign & Wayfinding program is a component of the 2007 Auburn University Campus Master Plan, and as such serves to acknowledge the substantial
Worthington Scranton. Campus Exterior Architectural Plan
Contents Introduction and Purpose Existing Conditions Inventory s Introduction and purpose The stated mission, vision and strategic goals of Penn State clearly define the University s responsibility to
REPORT TO BOARD ON PREFERENCES tbp/architecture CCSF Facilities Master Plan, October 23, 2016
PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to update the Board on the Facilities Master Plan initiative. PROCESS The Board conducted a Study Session about Phase 1 Needs on August 18, 2016. Since that time,
Chapter 7: Streetscape & Design Elements
OVERVIEW Chapter 7: Streetscape & Design Elements During the public input phase of The Dixie Fix, the area of streetscape generated much interest. While safety and traffic flow are primary objectives of
11.0 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
11.0 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Transit, Circulation and Parking Sub-Element: For all campuses, FIU's goal is to increase multimodal access. In combination with other measures - such as the development of
Subcampus Recommendations
T he campus is is comprised of three major areas. These subcampus areas are known as WestCampus, South Campus, Campus Oakland and Drive East Campus. and Future East growth Campus. requires a Future careful
Lambeth Main Street Streetscape Improvements
Lambeth Main Street Streetscape Improvements Open House October 5th, 2017 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Project Background 3. Context 4. Project Objectives 5. Design Principles & Approach 6. Streetscape Design
ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts
ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts 6-10 Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District 6-10.10 Purpose and Intent The Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District provides
CHAPTER 5 Public Realm Improvements
5.1 OVERVIEW This chapter focuses on the public realm, that is, spaces within and directly adjacent to public rights-of-way (ROWs), including streets, Oso Creek, the rail corridor, and the freeway edge.
CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Transportation Element Focus Group Meeting #3
CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2010-2020 Transportation Element Focus Group Meeting #3 December 2012 5 03 December 2012 1 Campus Master Plan 2010-2020 : Transportation Agenda 1. MMC 2. EC a. Inventory & Analysis
The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. The Anaheim Resort Identity Program
Specific Plan Appendix C The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Appendix C This page is intentionally blank. City of Anaheim Adopted September 1994 (94R-238) Amendment No. 1 September 2001 (2001R- 239) Amendment
Speedway Mall Project Frequently Asked Questions
Speedway Mall Project Frequently Asked Questions These FAQs will continue to be updated as new questions arise. Purpose of the Project and Uses of the Mall Q: Why is this project being done? A: The 1999
5.0 WAYFINDING STREETSCAPE DESIGN MASTER PLAN 55
OVERVIEW 57 SIGN TYPE A: GATEWAY 57 SIGN TYPES B & C: WAYFINDING KIOSKS & BOLLARDS 58 SIGN TYPES D: POLE MOUNTED ELEMENTS 59 SIGN TYPE E: LARGE-SCALE TYPOGRAPHIC INSTALLATION 60 SIGN TYPE F: VERTICAL CHOPSTICKS
Design Guidelines for the Route 30 Corridor Master Plan: Subdivision and Land Development Elements
Design Guidelines for the Route 30 Corridor Master Plan: Subdivision and Land Development Elements East Whiteland Township- Chester County, PA Prepared by: Draft: May 7, 2018 Design Guidelines for the
Rt 29 Solutions Hydraulic Planning Advisory Panel. September 14, 2017
Hydraulic Planning Advisory Panel September 14, 2017 Agenda Item 1: Introductions Hydraulic Planning Advisory Panel members Technical Team members 2 Agenda item 2: Public Interaction and Feedback Live
University of Saskatchewan CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. Senate Meeting Preliminary Presentation. April 21, 2018 DIALOG ECS DA WATT
University of Saskatchewan CAMPUS MASTER PLAN Senate Meeting Preliminary Presentation April 21, 2018 DIALOG ECS DA WATT project process presentation agenda Stakeholder Engagement Project Control phase1
DESIGN REVIEW SUB-COUNCIL MEMORANDUM TO: Dr. Karan Watson Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs Dr. Rodney McClendon Vice President for Administration FROM: Prof. David Woodcock Chair,
CHARLOTTESVILLE. Streetscape ENTRANCE CORRIDOR DESIGN GUIDELINES. Amendments adopted by City Council March 7, Design Principles...
CHARLOTTESVILLE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR DESIGN GUIDELINES Amendments adopted by City Council March 7, 2011 2 Streetscape A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. Design Principles...5 Plantings & Open Space...6 Pedestrian
A. Background Summary of Existing Challenges and Potential Possibilities. 1. Summary of Existing Assets and Potential Opportunities
A. Background 1 A Main Street Master Plan Study was performed and completed in October of 2007. The study was initiated to review current land uses and development patterns along Main Street, from Parrish
District Facilities Master Plan
W o r k s h o p B o a r d District Facilities Master Plan February 29, 2012 BACKGROUND + CONTEXT ANALYSIS OPTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS NEXT STEPS DFMP AGENDA BACKGROUND + CONTEXT ANALYSIS OPTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1.A NORTHWEST QUADRANT MASTER PLAN
4.1.A NORTHWEST QUADRANT MASTER PLAN (Ordinance 0-16-27, dated October 17, 2016) Goal: Transform the Northwest Quadrant into the cultural centerpiece of Deerfield. Objectives: 1. Maintain the cluster of
A Vibrant Downtown. Chapter 5 Cary Public Art Opportunities 31
A Vibrant Downtown Cary s vision for Downtown is a unique, vibrant, dynamic, pedestrian friendly location; a regional destination and a place to live, work, and recreate, according to the 2001 Town Center
SOUTH UNIVERSITY Street Design Alternatives in Progress
1 Alternatives in Progress 2016.01.20 Meeting Agenda 2 1. Progress & Schedule 2. Utilizing the Street Design Manual 3. Site Characteristics and Input Received 4. Street Geometry What can we accomplish
Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center
Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center The Town Center Vision is scattered throughout the Comprehensive Plan, development code and the 1994 Town Center Plan. What follows are sections
6-GATEWAYS, WAYFINDING & PUBLIC SIGNS
6-GATEWAYS, Wayfinding & ublic Signs 6-GATEWAYS, WAYFINDING & UBLIC SIGNS Downtown Georgetown has a strong base of local users as well as seasonal tourists and visitors. Many first-time visitors, and those
Supplement 3 NYU IDENTITY INTERIOR SIGNAGE
Supplement 3 NYU IDENTITY INTERIOR SIGNAGE Table of Contents Start Here Why Interior Sign Guidelines Are Needed... 3 Steps for Ordering Signs... 3 Important to Know... 3 Elements Logos... 4 Typography....
WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES
WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted by Council, 2006 WINDSOR GLEN REDEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES August 2006 1.0 Master Plan Organization For this area of the Coquitlam Town Centre, a mix of high,
SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines
SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines This section provides overall design principles and guidelines for the Gardnerville Mixed-use Overlay. They provide criteria for mixed-use places consisting of residential,
Good Design Guidelines for Downtown. Preliminary Findings and Recommendations
Good Design Guidelines for Downtown Preliminary Findings and Recommendations City Council Meeting - February 5, 2017 Advisory Committee Team: Larry Paul: Planning Commission /Architect Bruce Bagnoli: Business
City of Plattsburgh DRI: Downtown Streetscapes & Riverfront Access. Downtown Streetscape and Riverfront Access Design
City of Plattsburgh DRI: Downtown Streetscapes & Riverfront Access Welcome Thank you for coming this evening. Agenda PART I - Project Context The Downtown Revitalization Program Our DRI Projects Other
A Campus Within Context
A Campus Within Context A Comprehensive Master Plan for East Carolina University Optimize Valuable Resources Guide Future Development Establish Capital Priorities Create a Sense of Place Sustainable Campus
F. Driveways. Driveways which provide access to off-street parking or loading from public streets shall comply with the following:
Section 20.945.040 General Design Standards for Surface Parking Areas. A. Review Authority. Parking lot design and drainage shall be subject to review and approval of the City Transportation Manager. B.
Landscape and Streetscape Design 2.5
Landscape and Streetscape Design 2.5 2.5.1 Goals 2.5.2 Planting 2.5.3 Sidewalks and Pavement 2.5.4 Furnishings 2.5.5 Walls 2.5.6 Lighting 2.5.7 Stormwater 2.5.8 Street Cross Sections 2.5 LANDSCAPE AND
Citizen Advisory Group Meeting 5: Land Use April 14, 2011
Citizen Advisory Group Meeting 5: Land Use April 14, 2011 Meeting Agenda 1. Background Review 2. Transportation Follow-up 3. PED Overlay Approach 4. Land Use Mapping 5. Group Exercise 6. Wrap-up and Next
PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA TRANSIT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TRANSIT DISTRICT OVERLAY ZONE UPDATE
PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA TRANSIT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TRANSIT DISTRICT OVERLAY ZONE UPDATE UNIVERSITY PARK TOWN LISTENING SESSION JUNE 12, 2014 Prince George s County Planning Department The Maryland-National
Colchester Northern Gateway Master Plan Vision Review Draft. July 2016
Colchester Northern Gateway Master Plan Vision Review Draft July 2016 Contents Introduction 4 Context 8 Purpose of the Report 8 Strategic Position 9 Overview of the Process 11 2012 Master Plan Vision 12
Pentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3
Pentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3 CPHD April 23, 2015 Meeting Agenda Overview of approved Phase I Site Plan Review of relevant design guidelines Presentation of current proposal
Boise State University October 8 - Workshop # 2. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Executive Committee Ayers Saint Gross
Boise State University October 8 - Workshop # 2 MASTER PLAN UPDATE Executive Committee Ayers Saint Gross WORKSHOP AGENDA 01 WORK SESSION SUMMARY Program clarifications res life, trans, STEM Concept Plan
3.10 ROW Overlay District
3.10 A. Purpose The purpose of this Overlay District is to regulate items which could be placed or constructed within the Rights-of-way lying wholly or partially within the jurisdictional area of the Town
West Dennis Center: Bass River to Old Main Street. West Dennis Business District: Old Main Street to Dennis Commons
West Dennis Center: Bass River to Old Main Street West Dennis Business District: Old Main Street to Dennis Commons Dennisport Center: Dennis Commons to Division Street Main Street Project Goals Project
CAMPUS MASTER PLAN DRAFT PLAN UPDATE JANUARY
NEW MEXICO HIGHLANDS UNIVERSITY CAMPUS MASTER PLAN DRAFT PLAN UPDATE JANUARY 27 2010 MASTER PLANNING GOALS TO BALANCE THE STRATEGIC GOALS OF THE UNIVERSITY WITH THE PHYSICAL CAMPUS through the assessment
Fifth and Detroit Street Design/South University Update Capital Improvement Committee Meeting
1 Fifth and Detroit Street Design/South University Update Capital Improvement Committee Meeting Kick-off Meeting Agenda 2 1. Introductions 2. Update on South University 3. Fifth and Detroit-project scope
U Boulevard Area, 2018 Update. U Boulevard Area Update. Public Consultation Summary Report
U Boulevard Area 2018 Update Public Consultation Summary Report March 16 to April 8, 2018 1 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary... 3 2. The History and Changing Needs of the U Boulevard Area... 3 3.
The University District envisions, in its neighborhood
Envisioning the University District Link Light Rail in Seattle s neighborhoods CIY OF SEALE CONCEP-LEVEL SAION AREA PLANNING RECOMMENDAION RESOLUION # 30165 EXHIBI L Vision 08.2000 he University District
East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood
East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood Northridge Property Management Urban Design Brief 3195 East Bayshore Road City of Owen Sound January 2016 East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood Northridge Property Management
ASPEN HILL Minor Master Plan Amendment
ASPEN HILL Minor Master Plan Amendment Project Briefing Planning Board Agenda Item #7 Andrea Gilles, Area 2 June 5, 2014 Briefing Purpose 1. Follow-up evaluation on Mixed-Use land use in the Minor Amendment
Denver Moves: Transit Task Force
Insert transit picture Denver Moves: Transit Task Force Meeting #8 October 5, 2017 1. Welcome & Introductions Opening remarks and housekeeping Task Force and audience introductions Upcoming events and
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT TEAM
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS La Trobe University proudly acknowledges the Dja Dja Wurrung people, the traditional custodians of the land upon which the Bendigo Flora Hill campus is located. We recognise that Indigenous
Winston-Salem State University Campus Master Plan 2016 Update
Winston-Salem State University Campus Master Plan 2016 Update Request for Qualifications Page 1 of 6 Overview Winston-Salem State University (WSSU) is requesting qualifications from planning firms specializing
Interior signs are an extension of the exterior sign system and their content and design should take this into consideration.
General Guideline The Interior Sign standard is developed to address the need for a cost effective, functional, flexible and serviceable sign system. The intent is to assure code compliance, consistency
Westwind Developments Ltd. PIONEER LANDS AREA STRUCTURE PLAN - PROPOSED AMENDMENT
FEBRUARY 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 BACKGROUND... 1 1.1 Amendment... 1 2.0 LOCATION & CONTEXT... 2 2.1 Land Ownership... 2 3.0 POLICY CONTEXT... 3 3.1 Municipal Development Plan... 3 3.2 Capital Region
Agenda. 7 Wright Crescent Urban Design Study. Public Meeting and Urban Design Workshop. 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND (City of Kingston)
Urban Design Study Public Meeting and Urban Design Workshop October 02, 2013 Agenda 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND (City of Kingston) 2 URBAN DESIGN STUDY PRESENTATION (Antonio Gomez-Palacio, DIALOG) 3
Health Sciences City The available land area, although limited, combined with the unique partnership between the primary institutions and the supporting partnerships of the development interests within
DRAFT August 06, 2009
1 CAMPUS DESIGN GUIDELINES Introductory Text to Organization of Campus divided into PRIMARY campus elements and neighborhoods - each described by location and character, how buildings and open spaces relate
CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation
AGLE AREA COMMUNITY Plan CHAPTER 7 CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation Transportation, Mobility and Circulation The purpose of the Transportation, Mobility and Circulation Chapter is to
BELLEVUE COLLEGE Campus Master Plan February 29, 2016 (Space Needs Updated on 04/13/2016) Bellevue College Campus Master Plan April 13, :08 PM
BELLEVUE COLLEGE Campus Master Plan February 29, 2016 (Space Needs Updated on 04/13/2016) AGENDA / STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING 15:00 PLANNING PROCESS: 15:05 GUIDING PRINCIPLES: 15:10 SPACE NEEDS: 15:30
SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA
1 SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA Downtown Bozeman should be the location of buildings of greatest height and intensity in the community. The following guidelines apply
TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri
TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri What is Transit Oriented Development (TOD)? Development that focuses land uses around a transit
Maplewood Avenue Downtown Complete Street Project
Maplewood Avenue Downtown Complete Street Project Second Public Meeting January 24, 2018 Welcome and Introduction of Project Team City Planning and Public Works Staff City of Portsmouth Juliet Walker Planning
Achieving a Vision. Master Plan 2009 Belknap Campus August 10 11, UofL Belknap Campus Master Plan Update
Achieving a Vision Master Plan 2009 Belknap Campus August 10 11, 2009 Consultant Team The Campus Studio Ann Arbor Michigan Team Leader Campus Planning Site Design JRA Architects Louisville Kentucky Assistant
TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION
Workshop #3 TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION January 20, 2011 Consultant Team In Attendance Tonight BMS Design Group Nevada City and San Francisco Michael Smiley, AICP, ASLA Partner-in-Charge Nancy L.
NC S tate. Wayfinding Analysis and Master Plan for Future Signage Needs. Prepared by: Lorenc Design and Muhlhausen Design and Associates.
NC S tate University Wayfinding Analysis and Master Plan for Future Signage Needs Prepared by: Lorenc Design and Muhlhausen Design and Associates 1 March 1996 INTRODUCTION We applaud the University s concerns
GREENING THE BOULEVARD Master Plan Concepts for Venice Boulevard between Lincoln and Sawtelle
GREENING THE BOULEVARD Katherine Spitz Associates Inc. 4212½ Glencoe Avenue Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 310 574 4460 Fax 574 4462 January 2008 Table of Contents Overview Proposed Design Improvements Illustration
There are five comprehensive goals that inform the Urban Design element at FIU. They are:
3.0 URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT This Comprehensive Master Plan Update reflects the University s commitment to the refinement and extension of the base concepts earlier master planning efforts have created. FIU
design & access statement Proposed Erection of 68 Bedroom Hotel and Restaurant with Associated Landscaping
Proposed Erection of 68 Bedroom Hotel and Restaurant with Associated Landscaping Promenade, design & access statement lawrencemcphersonassociates 6 new road, ayr, ka8 8ex On Behalf of July 2015 CONTENTS
On behalf of Metrolinx, in coordination with the City of Mississauga. and Presentation Materials (draft)
On behalf of Metrolinx, in coordination with the City of Mississauga Port Credit GO Station Area Master Plan Study Advisory Panel Meeting #3 Handouts and Presentation Materials (draft) June 10, 2015 Agenda
PARKLET PROPOSAL PACKAGE & PROCESS
500.3 I PARKLETS The term parklet refers to a small temporary constructed seating or community gathering area over an on-street parking space or an extension of the sidewalk into the operating State highway
Urban Design & Placemaking
Urban Design & Placemaking What is Urban Design? Urban Design is the discipline of creating equitable, vibrant, and sustainable places with distinct identities. The profession pulls from other built environment
Draft Cary Community Plan Review Part 3: Shop, Engage, Serve, Special Area Plans, Other Updates. October 27, 2015 Police Department Training Room
Draft Cary Community Plan Review Part 3: Shop, Engage, Serve, Special Area Plans, Other Updates Committee for the Future October 27, 2015 Police Department Training Room AGENDA 1. Welcome and Call to Order
FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable
Greenway. Two Rivers. Design Guidelines and Signage Plan. Broome County. Tioga County. Prepared For: The Binghamton Metropolitan Transportation Study
Broome County Two Rivers Greenway Design Guidelines and Signage Plan Tioga County Prepared For: The Binghamton Metropolitan Transportation Study Prepared By: 2012 This project is included in the 2011-2012
INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND. Signage Goals
V. SIGNAGE Introduction V-1 Sign Design V-2 Sign Content V-5 Facade-Mounted Signs V-6 Multi-Tenant Properties V-7 Externally Lit Signs V-9 Internally Lit Signs V-10 Temporary Signs V-11 Salem Signs V-12
VIRGINIA / LAKE HIGHLAND TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE STUDY
VIRGINIA / LAKE HIGHLAND TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE STUDY COMMUNITY MEETING #2 - PRESENTATION OVERVIEW 1 INTRODUCTION 2 CONTEXT STUDIES 3 VISION FRAMEWORK 4 DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS 2 1 INTRODUCTION Project
WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Quad Cities Riverfront Campus Preliminary Master Plan Presentation 2 February 1, 2006 Achieving Future Flexibility 1. Monitor space needs as the new buildings come on line and
Appendix D: Stop Architecture
Appendix D: Stop Architecture London Bus Rapid Transit Transit Project Assessment Process Environmental Project Report DRAFT April 2018 P R E PA R E D BY 1 DESIGN CRITERIA... 1-1 Key Stop Features... 1-1