City of Lafayette Study Session Project Data
|
|
- Augustine Kory Wilcox
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 City of Lafayette Study Session Project Data For: Design Review Commission By: Michael P. Cass, Senior Planner Date: August 24, 2015 Property Address: 954 Mountain View Drive APN: Zoning District: RB Lot Area: 13,939-sq. ft. Flood Zone: X Existing Use: Office Proposed Use: Multi-Family Residential Project Description SS13-15 Lenox Homes, LLC (Applicant), 954 Mountain View Associates, LP (Owner), RB Zoning: Request for a Study Session to demolish the existing buildings and construct three duplexes (two and three story buildings), requiring (1) Demolition Permit, (2) Design Review, and (3) Variance to allow the use of garage lifts for parking and for the garages to encroach within the required 10-foot landscape side yard setback, at 954 Mountain View Drive, APN Trigger Yes No Trigger Yes No Within a protected ridgeline setback? Within 100-ft. of a ridgeline setback? In the Hillside Overlay District? Over 17-ft. in height to ridge? SFR Development > 6,000 sq. ft.? [not located within SFR zoning district] Creek Setback required Demolition Permit Grading > 50 cu.yds.? DR required as condition of approval? In a commercial or MFR zone? Variance requested? Tree Permit Requested? Land Use Permit required? Public Art required? Permitted / Required Existing Proposed Impervious surface - +/-10,000-sq. ft. - Units/Density 35 dwelling units/acre - 6 units; 18 dwelling units/acre Building Height Setbacks 10-0 landscaped yard if - - adjacent to residential Open Space 20% of lot - - Parking 11 spaces - 14 spaces Required Findings: The proposed development will be subject to the following findings when a formal application is submitted: 1 of 4
2 Design Review Commission SS13-15 Lenox Homes Staff Report August 24, Specific findings required for demolition permit. 1. The proposed demolition and development, rehabilitation or other physical change are consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and all applicable specific plans; and 2. The proposed demolition will not eliminate an integral structure located in a historic block that would negatively impact the character and aesthetics of that block; or 3. The proposed demolition will not eliminate a structure of architectural or historical significance in the Downtown, unless the benefits to the community from the proposed development, rehabilitation, or physical alteration significantly outweigh the historic, civic, or cultural significance of the existing structure (D) Downtown Design Review Findings. The hearing authority shall make the following findings for projects which occurs within the four downtown commercial zoning districts as outlined in Section 6-272(A)(2): (1) The project substantially complies with the Downtown Design Guidelines. (2) The site design, including building placement, parking & circulation, landscape, and outdoor space, enhances the pedestrian experience, embraces and preserves creeks and natural features, promotes connections, creates visual interest, and relates to the character of the surrounding development. (3) The building design, including height and scale, architectural details, and amenities, provides diversity in building form, preserves views of surrounding hillsides and ridges as seen from Mt. Diablo Boulevard, creates an inviting environment for pedestrians, and relates to the character of the surrounding development. (4) The project promotes a character relating to Lafayette that is informal with variations in architectural styles, massing, setbacks, and upper story step-backs. (5) The project, when adjacent to existing residential dwelling units, is designed to minimize impacts, including noise, privacy, light and glare Findings required for approval of grading exceeding 50 cubic yards. 1. The grading will not endanger the stability of the site or adjacent property or pose a significant ground movement hazard to an adjacent property. The decision making authority may require the project geotechnical engineer to certify the suitability of the project supported by appropriate technical studies, including subsurface investigation; 2. The grading will not significantly increase erosion or flooding affecting the site or other property and will not cause impacts to riparian habitats, stream channel capacity or water quality that cannot be substantially mitigated; 3. The grading, when completed, will result in a building site that is visually compatible with the surrounding land; 2 of 4
3 Design Review Commission SS13-15 Lenox Homes Staff Report August 24, The grading is sensitive to the existing landforms, topography and natural features on the site; and 5. The design of the project preserves existing trees on the site and trees on adjoining property to the extent possible Permit category II: Protected tree on developed or undeveloped property associated with a development application. D. Determination. The application shall be approved or denied by the manager, design review commission, planning commission or city council based on the factors in subsection (D) and the following additional factors: 1. Necessity for the pruning or removal in order to construct a required improvement on public property or within a public right-of-way or to construct an improvement that allows reasonable economic enjoyment of private property; 2. Extent to which a proposed improvement may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree; and 3. Extent to which a proposed change in the existing grade within the protected perimeter may be modified to preserve and maintain a protected tree Findings required for a variance. 1. Because of special circumstances concerning the subject property including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning regulations deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and in the same land use district; and 2. The variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege which is not generally available to other property in the vicinity and in the same land use district; and 3. The variance substantially complies with the intent and purpose of the land use district in which the property is classified. General, Master, & Specific Plans: Following are notable excerpts of adopted general, master, and specific plans: Lafayette General Plan: Goal LU-7 Encourage Downtown development which is attractive and enhances Lafayette s Policy LU-7.1 Policy H-2.1 Design: Ensure that site planning, architecture, color, materials and landscaping contribute to the community identity and small town character. Mixed Use: Encourage the rehabilitation and development of residential uses in commercial areas where the viability of the commercial activities would not be adversely affected. 3 of 4
4 Design Review Commission SS13-15 Lenox Homes Staff Report August 24, 2015 Bikeways Master Plan 5.3 Bikeway network project category descriptions: Study the feasibility of establishing the following streets as Bicycle Boulevards: Mountain View Drive from Mt. Diablo Blvd. to Bickerstaff Road, along Bickerstaff Road to Dewing Avenue, along Dewing Avenue to Brook Street, along Brook Street to Moraga Rd. Establish bicycle route signage along Moraga Rd. to Moraga Blvd., along Moraga Blvd. to First St. to Mt. Diablo Blvd. This route will serve as a bypass to the section of Mt. Diablo Blvd. without bike lanes. Downtown Specific Plan: Under the Downtown Specific Plan, the property is located within the Downtown Retail area. Goal 2 Downtown Character Districts. Create districts whose characteristics and land uses complement each other while providing variety and texture to the downtown. Policy 2.8 Downtown Retail Density. The maximum residential density is 35 units per acre. Policy 2.9 Downtown Retail Building Height. The maximum number of stories is three. The maximum height is 35 feet with the ability to increase the height limit to 45 feet only if the City Council is able to make the strict findings to grant an exception to the 35-foot height limit. Master Walkways Plan Appendix A: Street Final Condition Work to Complete Mt. View Dr. East side, Mt. Diablo Blvd. to Brook St., West side Mt. Diablo Blvd. to the creek. East side, existing walkway north to Mt. DiabloWest side Mt. Diablo to the creek, missing links Attachments: A. Maps and Aerials B. Project Plans, received August 17, of 4
5 8/14/ M ountain View Drive AP N feet 2014 Digital Map Products. All rights reserved. 1/1
6 8/14/ M ountain View Drive AP N feet 2014 Digital Map Products. All rights reserved. 1/1
7 PROPOSED MOUNTAIN VIEW COTTAGES CONCEPT 6 UNIT PROJECT Located at 954 Mountain View Drive Lafayette, California For CITY OF LAFAYETTE STUDY SESSION: DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION Gordon Chong, Chair Shalini Agrawal, Vice Chair Bob Cleaver, Commissioner Andre Ptaszynski, Commissioner Ritch Voss, Commissioner August 24, 2015 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN PROJECT MANAGEMENT MEMBERS AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, AIA San Francisco Bay Area Los Angeles Newell Arnerich, AIA Rose Lukens, Interior Designer 3738 Mt. Diablo Blvd., 3 rd Floor, Lafayette CA t Wilshire Boulevard Suite 310 Los Angeles CA t
8 PROPOSED MOUNTAIN VIEW COTTAGES PROJECT SITE 954 Mountain View Dr. Amanda Lane SITE PLAN
9 PROPOSED MOUNTAIN VIEW COTTAGES PROJECT WOONERF CONCEPT for open space/drive areas woo nerf ˈvoonərf/ noun 1. a road in which devices for reducing or slowing the flow of traffic have been installed. A woonerf (Dutch pronunciation: [ˈʋoːnɛrf]) is a living street, as originally implemented in the Netherlands and in Flanders. Techniques include shared space, traffic calming, and low speed limits. Rockridge Townhomes Benvenue/Alcatraz Oakland, CA Woonerf converted space Netherlands Infill Site Brittany Cottages Arch Street Berkeley, CA Woonerf designed Street Netherlands Palmas Viejas Townhomes Santa Barbara, CA
10 PROPOSED COTTAGES PROJECT GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Exterior Open Space Area = Min. 20% SITE PLAN w/ GROUND FLOOR PLANS
11 PROPOSED MOUNTAIN VIEW COTTAGES PROJECT AERIAL COMPOSITE SITE COMPOSITE SITE PLAN
12 PROPOSED MOUNTAIN VIEW COTTAGES PROJECT PEDESTRIAN /COMMUNITY SPACE PEDESTRIAN /COMMUNITY SPACE
13 PROPOSED MOUNTAIN VIEW COTTAGES PROJECT 2nd LEVEL PLANS 2nd LEVEL FLOOR PLANS
14 PROPOSED MOUNTAIN VIEW COTTAGES PROJECT 3 rd LEVEL PLANS 3r d LEVEL FLOOR PLANS
15 PROPOSED MOUNTAIN VIEW COTTAGES PROJECT BASEMENT FLOOR PLANS BASEMENT FLOOR PLANS
City of Lafayette Staff Report
City of Lafayette Staff Report For: By: Design Review Commission Greg Wolff, Senior Planner Meeting Date: April 27, 2015 Subject: SS03-15 Gundi & Peter Younger (Owners), R-40 Zoning: Request for a Study
More informationCity of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission
++ City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission Meeting Date: January 08, 2018 Staff: Subject: Chris Juram, Planning Technician SS12-17 Miramar Homebuilders, R-20 Zoning: Request
More informationCity of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission
City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission Meeting Date: April 24, 2017 Staff: Payal Bhagat, Senior Planner Subject: HDP18-15 & HDP31-15 Ramesh Patel & Melcor Development (Owners),
More informationGENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS Prepared by Planning Staff 10/28/2013 APPLICABLE GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS FROM the LAND USE CHAPTER Goal LU-1 Policy LU-1.1 Policy LU-1.2 Goal LU-2 Protect the character
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT APRIL 7, 2016
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT APRIL 7, 2016 TO: FROM: Members of the Planning Commission Talyn Mirzakhanian, Senior Planner FILE NO.: 160001710 PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: RECOMMENDATION: A request for a
More informationCity of Lafayette Staff Report
City of Lafayette Staff Report For: By: Planning Commission Megan Canales, Planning Technician Meeting Date: January 20, 2015 Subject: Deadline: HDP15-14 RSR Development Company (Owners) R-10 Zoning: Request
More informationCITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD IBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Coast Highway APN
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: October 13,2011 TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD IBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CASE: Variance 7717 Design Review 11-163 Coastal Development
More informationSite Design (Table 2) Fact Sheet & Focus Questions:
Site Design (Table 2) Fact Sheet & Focus Questions: BACKGROUND WHAT IS SITE DESIGN? Site design refers to the arrangement of buildings and open spaces on adjacent sites to maximize the shared benefits
More informationCity of Lafayette Staff Report
City of Lafayette Staff Report For: By: Design Review Commission Greg Wolff, Senior Planner Meeting Date: November 25, 2013 Subject: L03-11 O BRIEN LAND CO., LLC (APPLICANT), AMD FAMILY TRUST (OWNER),
More information14825 Fruitvale Ave.
REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Date: August 26, 2015 Application: PDR14-0017 Location/APN: 14825 Fruitvale Ave. / 397-18-028 Applicant/Owner: Staff Planner: Sin Yong Michael Fossati 14825 Fruitvale
More informationAgenda Report Meeting Date 11/02/16. Architectural Review (Wildwood Estates Townhomes)
Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board Agenda Report Meeting Date 11/02/16 REPORT DATE: October 24, 2016 File: AR 16-19 TO: FROM: RE: Architectural Review and Historic Preservation Board
More informationAWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAY 8, 2014 The Planning and Development Department hereby forwards to the Planning
More informationCOMPLIANCE CHECKLIST HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL
COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL The following checklist summarizes development guidelines and standards. See the appropriate section for a complete explanation of the
More informationFile No (Continued)
(Continued) Request for: (1) a Site Plan Review; (2) a Variance (to build on a significant ridgeline); (3) an Oak Tree Permit (to encroach into the protected zone of 25 oak trees and for potential thinning
More informationPlanning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008
Owner/Applicant Taylor Village Sacramento Investments Partners, LP c/o Kim Whitney 1792 Tribute Road #270 Sacramento, CA 95815 Staff Recommendation Planning Commission Staff Report Project: File: Request:
More informationVenice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR
City of Los Angeles 5.9 LAND USE PLANS 5.9.1 Environmental Setting Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR The Project lies within the bounds of Los Angeles County and the City of Los Angeles.
More information5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and,
Article 5. Landscaping 5.1 Purpose The Town of Laurel Park s landscape standards are designed to create a beautiful, aesthetically pleasing built environment that will complement and enhance community
More informationHighway Oriented Commercial Development Criteria
7.6 HOC-1 Highway Oriented Commercial District A. Statement of Purpose The Highway Oriented Commercial District (HOC-1) is intended to provide for the development of high density retail and service businesses
More informationDowntown / Ballough Road Redevelopment Board
Agenda Item 5 CONDITIONAL USE DEV2014-095 Pai in the Sky Downtown / Ballough Road Redevelopment Board Staff Report TO: Downtown / Ballough Road Board Members FROM: Jason Jeffries, Project Manager DATE:
More informationAppendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria
Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria C-1 Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria PURPOSE: The implementation of numerous policies contained within the Master Plan hinges on the creation
More informationPC RESOLUTION NO
PC RESOLUTION NO. 14-01-14-02 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP fttm) 17441. REZONE {RZ) 13-003, ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 13-003, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRP) 13-052. GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM) 13-002. CONDITIONAL
More informationF. The following uses in the HR District: attached single-family dwellings, condominiums, and institutional uses; and
1102 DESIGN REVIEW 1102.01 PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY Section 1102 is adopted to provide standards, criteria, and procedures under which design review may be approved. Design review is required for: A.
More informationORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and
ORDINANCE 17-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA, CREATING ARTICLE XIV OF CHAPTER 118 OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN CODE OF ORDINANCES PROVIDING FOR THE EAST PLANT
More information4.3 Dudley Area Plan. Introduction. History and Existing Character. Desired Future Character for Dudley
4.3 Dudley Area Plan Introduction The suburb of Dudley has developed as a result of various circumstances including its topography, history and mineral resources. Dudley development has been identified
More informationCHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES Section 1300.00 Section 1300.01 Design Guidelines Purpose The purposes of this section are to: A. The purpose of this Section is to establish procedures and standards to serve
More information1001 and 1011 University Avenue
Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION NOVEMBER 12, 2009 1001 and 1011 University Avenue Use Permit #09-10000066 to establish a retail wine store; (C-W, SBR)
More information4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES
4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES a. City Center District The City Center District incorporates the existing character and mix of uses in downtown Belmont to encourage redevelopment and new development in keeping
More informationPolicies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center
Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center The Town Center Vision is scattered throughout the Comprehensive Plan, development code and the 1994 Town Center Plan. What follows are sections
More informationEnsure that development within the Arrowtown Urban Growth Boundary provides:
URBAN DEVELOPMENT 4 4.2.5.2 Ensure that development within the Arrowtown Urban Growth Boundary provides: an urban form that is sympathetic to the character of Arrowtown, including its scale, density, layout
More information4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 7. LAND USE AND PLANNING
4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 7. LAND USE AND PLANNING 4.7.1 INTRODUCTION The following analysis discusses the consistency of the Proposed Project with the corresponding land use and zoning designations
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2016
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2016 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Michael Klein, Planner FILE NO.: 150000780 PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: RECOMMENDATION: A request for a Site Plan
More informationRESIDENTIAL GUIDELINES CHECKLIST
RESIDENTIAL GUIDELINES CHECKLIST The following checklist was created to provide you with an easy way to ensure that your project complies with the Residential Design Guidelines. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
More informationInfill Residential Design Guidelines
Infill Residential Design Guidelines Adopted March 23, 2004 Amended September 10, 2013 City of Orange Community Development Department Planning Division Phone: (714) 744-7220 Fax: (714) 744-7222 www.cityoforange.org
More informationTOWN OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION. CASE NUMBER: Development Permit No and Variance No
TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. 2 Staff Report AGENDA DATE: October 2, 2013 CASE NUMBER: Development Permit No. 2013-004 and Variance No. 2013-001 APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: R.A.M. Architecture,
More informationURBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville
URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road Town of Oakville Prepared By: METROPOLITAN CONSULTING INC For 2500674 Ontario Inc November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 Introduction/Description of Subject
More informationObey Creek July 17, Vicinity Map. Concept Plan Submittal. No
15/501 Fordham Blvd. 15/501 By-Pass To Downtown Chapel Hill Vicinity Map 0 1000 2000 FT Arlen Park DR. Bennett Road Mt. Carmel Church Rd. Southern Village Parkside Circle Market St. 15/501 Founder's Ridge
More informationAttachment 4. TRPA Environmental Documentation, IEC/MFONSE
Required Findings for Certification of the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and Initial Environmental Checklist/Mitigated Finding Of No Significant Effect (IS/MFONSE) TRPA Environmental
More informationNOTICE OF AVAILABILITY (NOA) OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2190 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY (NOA) OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2190 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project Notice
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA SANTA CRUZ CAMPUS PLANNING 9500 GILMAN DRIVE # 0074 TEL: (858) 534 6515 LA JOLLA,
More informationCity of Lafayette Staff Report
City of Lafayette Staff Report For: By: Design Review Commission Sarah Allen, Associate Planner Meeting Date: May 23, 2016 Subject: Deadline: HDP04-16 Joe Egan (Owner) R-20 Zoning: Request for (1) a Hillside
More informationPLNPCM Carl s Jr. Commercial Parking Lot at Redwood Road and 1700 South
Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Casey Stewart; 801-535-6260 Date: November 4, 2016 Re: PLNPCM2015-00874 Carl s Jr. Commercial Parking
More informationPLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)
Central Permit Center 555 Santa Clara Street Vallejo CA 94590 Business License Building Fire Prevention Planning Public Works 707.648.4310 707.648.4374 707.648.4565 707.648.4326 707.651.7151 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
More informationSAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Steering Committee Presentation February 14, 2018 Purpose of General Plan Guide land use and development decisions Coordinate transportation, infrastructure,
More informationDOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
DOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES May 18, 2010 Introduction DOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES The Downtown Transcona Urban Design Guidelines ("the Guidelines") establish criteria for
More informationCHAPTER SPECIAL PURPOSE AND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Special Purpose and Overlay Zoning Districts 106.28.010 CHAPTER 106.28 - SPECIAL PURPOSE AND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS SPECIAL PURPOSE AND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS Sections: 106.28.010 - Purpose 106.28.020
More information4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY
SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY This section evaluates the potential impacts to aesthetics and visual quality. Aesthetics refers to visual resources and the quality of what can
More informationIV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES
IV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Existing Visual Character Project Site The project site is located at 17331-17333 Tramonto Drive in the Pacific Palisades community of the City of Los Angeles
More informationZoning Technical Review Presented by Camiros. November 10, 2015
Zoning Technical Review Presented by Camiros November 10, 2015 TECHNICAL REVIEW OVERVIEW Purpose of this Report Outline issues with current Ordinance Present preliminary approaches for revisions Set drafting
More informationCITY OF BELVEDERE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REPORT DATE: 4/12/16 AGENDA ITEM: 5
CITY OF BELVEDERE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REPORT DATE: 4/12/16 AGENDA ITEM: 5 MEETING DATE: 4/19/16 TO: FROM: REVIEWED BY: SUBJECT: City of Belvedere Planning Commission Rebecca Markwick, Associate
More informationURBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018
URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018 DESIGN BRIEF CONTENTS PART A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 DESCRIPTION & ANALYSIS OF SITE CONTEXT 3.0 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES
More informationMORAGA HILLSIDES AND RIDGELINES PROJECT
MORAGA HILLSIDES AND RIDGELINES PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING, JUNE 29, 2016 Project Overview The Hillsides and Ridgelines project will amend existing Town hillside regulations to increase certainty,
More informationARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING
IV 13 404 MASTER PLANNING Master Planning through the Site Analysis (Master Planning Site Analysis) or Planned Development (Master Planning Planned Development) is provided to encourage development which
More informationDATE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 2016
DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: THE PLANNING COMMISSION LISA COSTA SANDERS, TOWN PLANNER REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL STRUCTURES PERMIT FOR A POOL IN THE SIDE YARD AND
More informationDescription of Preferred Alternative
Chapter 2 Description of Preferred Alternative 2.1 Introduction This chapter of the programmatic Sammamish Town Center Sub-area Plan Final EIS provides a more detailed description of the Preferred Alternative
More informationRecommendations Affecting the University Heights Neighborhood that Overlap Both the Uptown and North Park Community Planning Areas
October 21, 2010 William Anderson, Director City Planning and Community Investment City of San Diego 202 C Street, MS 5A San Diego, CA 92101 RE: Recommendations Affecting the University Heights Neighborhood
More informationM E M O R A N D U M CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA
M E M O R A N D U M CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: FROM: The Honorable Landmarks Commission Planning Staff SUBJECT: Certificate
More informationPlanned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )
Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM2014-00139) Standard residential development Planned Development Example: Smaller lot sizes than what is allowed to create open space amenity. What
More informationAREA-WIDE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION
OUSD LANEY CHILD CARE CENTER ART BUILDING LANEY COLLEGE BALL FIELDS PCCD OFFICES PERALTA PARK AQUATIC CENTER & ESTUARY PARK EDOFF MEMORIAL BANDSTAND SNOW PARK COURT HOUSE OAKLAND MUSEUM OAK ST AREA-WIDE
More informationMONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for McKinley Appeal of Webb Single Family Dwelling
MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for McKinley Appeal of Webb Single Family Dwelling Staff Report Date: June 29, 2016 Case No.: 16APL-00000-00011, 16APL- 00000-00016 Environmental Document: Notice
More informationApproved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, :30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL
Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 2015 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 15-016; Final Planned Unit Development Arden Plaza;
More informationB L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development
B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development Adopted June 18, 2009 This section of the Design and focuses on site planning and design guidance for new multi-family
More informationComplete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool
Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool Prepared By: City of Regina Planning Department October 2014 Page 1 of 14 Community Development Review Checklist for Secondary Plans and Concept Plans The
More informationM E M O R A N D U M SITE DATA
Department of Community Planning & Economic Development 250 South 4 th Street, Room 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415-1385 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Planning Commission, Committee of the Whole FROM: Lisa Steiner,
More informationII. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Castle Rock is made up of numerous individually built houses and subdivision tracts that have been developed during the past century. Some of the tracts are diverse in architectural
More informationSUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')
TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Community Development Department SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Through the joint efforts of the City of Tulsa planning staff and the Land Services division of Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG), the Berryhill Land
More informationLOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Corner lots with coach houses to increase diversity, provide unity to the streetscape and increase eyes on the street. Garages and ancillary units accessed via rear lanes. Parking
More informationURBAN DESIGN BRIEF Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 25, Project No. 1507
URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 1131 Gordon Street City of Guelph Prepared on behalf of 1876698 Ontario Inc. March 25, 2016 Project No. 1507 423 Woolwich Street, Suite 201, Guelph, Ontario, N1H 3X3 Phone (519) 836-7526
More informationCHAPTER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE
CITY OF MOSES LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 18.31 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE Sections: 18.31.010 Purpose 18.31.020 Minimum Lot Area 18.31.030 Setbacks 18.31.040 Maximum
More informationCENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
Applicant s Name: Project Address: NEIGHBORHOOD Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable to the project. Check the box if meets guideline. Indicate
More informationMINUTES OF THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 1, 2016
MINUTES OF THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 1, 2016 Town Council Meeting 09/20/16 Item #1 The Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos conducted a Special Meeting on Thursday, September 1, 2016, at 6:00
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2015 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair McCormick and Members of the Design Review Committee Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Kelly Christensen
More informationCity of Lafayette Staff Report
City of Lafayette Staff Report For: By: Design Review Commission Greg Wolff, Senior Planner Meeting Date: September 26, 2011 Subject: L06-11 SIGNATURE DEVELOPMENT GROUP (APPLICANT), JACK & AUDIE DUDUM
More information-~~ ft' -,,~, PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. Study Session for New Mixed-Use Building at 999 Fremont Avenue
' -~~ - -. -- --.ft' -,,~, ''. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 17, 2018 Subject: Prepared by: Initiated by: Study Session for New Mixed-Use Building at 999 Fremont Avenue Zachary Dahl,
More informationTOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION
Workshop #3 TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION January 20, 2011 Consultant Team In Attendance Tonight BMS Design Group Nevada City and San Francisco Michael Smiley, AICP, ASLA Partner-in-Charge Nancy L.
More informationPlanned Residential Neighborhoods Land Use Goals
Planned Residential Neighborhoods Land Use Goals Issue: Guidelines that provide for diverse high quality residential areas that include a variety of housing styles and layouts are needed. Goal 1: Create
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012 TO: FROM: Members of the Planning Commission Michael Klein, Associate Planner FILE NO.: 120000890 PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: Request for an Administrative
More informationPresentation of the Staff Draft. July 17, 2014 SSRVP Team, Area 3
Presentation of the Staff Draft July 17, 2014 SSRVP Team, Area 3 Presentation Overview Introduction Plan Framework Plan Recommendations Implementation Next Steps and Request for Public Hearing on September
More informationDRAFT. 10% Common Open Space
% OF CHARLOTTE IS CATEGORIZED AS A. LAND USES : Placeholder map displaying location of Place Type GOALS: Accommodate XX% of future growth. Provide a concentration of primarily commercial and civic activity
More informationSnow Kreilich Architects and Commutator, LLC Katie Myhre, Snow Kreilich Architects
Property Location: Project Name: 117-125 1 st Street North Commutator Foundry Development Prepared By: Aaron Hanauer, Senior City Planner, (612) 673-2494 Applicant: Project Contact: Request: Required Applications:
More informationSeptember 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403-1388 RE: Station Park Green Dear
More informationStaff Report CONDITIONAL USE
Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT To: From: Salt Lake City Planning Commission Daniel Echeverria, (801) 535-7165, daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com Date: May 21, 2015 Re: PLNPCM2015-00139
More informationHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Park Strip Raised Planter Boxes Minor Alteration PLNHLC2014-00603 163 D Street Meeting Date: November 6, 2014 Planning Division Department of Community and Economic
More informationEast Garrison Pattern Book. Urban Design Associates
East Garrison Pattern Book Urban Design Associates july 2004 Design Guidelines for a New Community Master Developer east garrison partners 1, llc Master Code Consultant urban design associates Pittsburgh,
More informationRESOLUTION NO: WHEREAS, the subject property has a Public, Semi-Public (PS) zoning designation and a General Plan designation of Institutional; and
RESOLUTION NO: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASADENA APPROVING A 14-YEAR, EIGHT-PHASE MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT FOR HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL LOCATED AT 100 WEST CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD
More informationI Street, Sacramento, CA
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sacramento 12 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 To: Members of the Planning Commission PUBLIC HEARING March 10, 2011 Subject: El Dorado Savings Sign Variance
More informationManchester. Vision for Manchester
Manchester Vision for Manchester The Manchester Community Plan is a statement of the community values and aspirations for the future. This is an effort to recognize what originally attracted visitors in
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA DESIGN REVIEW REPORT : CPZ-3-1 : (S) Cynthia Lee-Sheng AT LARGE: A Chris Roberts B Elton M. Lagasse ADVERTISING DATES: 06/03/1 06/10/1 06/17/1 PAB PUBLIC
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: AUGUST 2, 2017 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Imboden and Members of the Design Review Committee Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director
More informationREQUEST FOR CHANGE TO APPROVED AMBASSADOR WEST PROJECT AND VARIANCE #I 1669 FOR 182 SOUTH ORANGE GROVE BOULEVARD (MAYFAIR MANSION)
Agenda Report TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Development Department REQUEST FOR CHANGE TO APPROVED AMBASSADOR WEST PROJECT AND VARIANCE #I 1669 FOR 182 SOUTH ORANGE GROVE
More informationZoning Code Issues Prioritization
City of Streetsboro The City of Streetsboro has begun the process of updating its Zoning Code. The new Zoning Code will be based on the recently adopted Comprehensive Plan, which establishes the overall
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2012 TO: Chair Woollett and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Daniel Ryan,
More informationCity Of Sparks Planning Commission Item
Page 1 of 12 City Of Sparks Planning Commission Item Meeting Date: May17, 2012 Subject: PCN12009, Public Hearing, Consideration and possible action on a Master Plan Amendment and Rezoning request to change
More informationREPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento
REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 5 PUBLIC HEARING June 12, 2014 To: Members of the Planning and Design Commission Subject: Newman Center Sign (P14-017) A request to construct
More informationLos Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT
Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION HEARING DATE: April 7, 2011 TIME: 10:00 AM PLACE: City Hall, Room 1010 200 N. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012
More informationNob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project EIR
Section 3.1 Aesthetics This section addresses the visual aspects that may affect the views experienced by the public, including the potential to impact the existing character of each area that comprises
More information920 BAYSWATER AVENUE PROJECT
920 BAYSWATER AVENUE PROJECT VISUAL ASSESSMENT Prepared for the City of Burlingame Prepared by Circlepoint 46 S First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 June 2018 This page intentionally left blank. 920 Bayswater
More informationGold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan
Appendix F Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan Introduction and Purpose of the Plan The Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit facility is an eleven-mile dedicated
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2012 TO: Chair Woollett and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Daniel Ryan,
More informationBe it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new A (Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District) is adopted:
Local Law No. 4 of 2018 (Adoption of 280-18A (Transit Oriented Development District) Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new 280-18A (Transit Oriented Development
More information