Heritage Precincts Overlay

Transcription

1 Rule 2.4 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule Statement Heritage Precincts are areas with consistent special heritage character. The District Plan has identified fourthree Heritage Precincts, the Frankton Railway Village (see Appendix 2.4-I), Hayes Paddock (see Appendix 2.4-la), and the Hamilton East Villa Precinct (see Appendix 2.4-1c) and The Temple (see Appendix 2.4-1d). The heritage values associated with these precincts are derived from both the physical items within the built environment (eg. the dwellings, parks) and the spatial patterns (eg. subdivision patterns, building layout and streetscape) (see Appendix 2.4-II). The purpose of the rule is to protect the identified historic heritage values of the area while allowing the on-going development. The rules control activities which may have an adverse effect on the identified heritage values of the precincts, including demolition and removal of buildings, alterations and additions and, new buildingsdwellings and the removal of dwellings. The rule also imposes standards that control other important aspects such as density, setbacks from the road, and building heights to ensure that identified heritage values are maintained. Expected Outcome Protection of the unique characteristics of identified heritage precincts while encouraging development and activities which are sympathetic to the precincts identified heritage values. Means of Compliance The following rules shall be read in conjunction with the standards and performance assessments in the zone in which the site is located, and all other rules in the plan. The Heritage Precinct Overlay rules shall be complied with first, then the relevant zone or city-wide rules shall apply. Where an overlay also includes specific Heritage Items (Rule 2.3), or Significant Trees (Rule 2.2), the provisions of the Precinct Overlay must be complied with first, then the specific Overlay, provided that in all cases the most demanding provisions shall apply. Where different activity status apply the relevant provisions in the overlay rule take precedence. The activity status of a Permitted or Controlled Activity may be altered from the activity list below where the activity cannot meet one or more of the standards in this rule. For clarification of activity status see Rule Failure to Meet Standards or for the Hamilton East Villa Precinct see Rule 4.1B.5 Failure to meet Standards. Regard must be had to all Objectives and Policies which may be relevant to any proposed activity subject to this Rule. This includes, but shall not be limited to, Policy Sections 5.1 Residential Areas and 7.1 Built Heritage. Advisory Note Consultation with the Historic Places Trust November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule 2.4-1

2 A notified resource consent application will be served on the Historic Places Trust by Council for any application which affects any historic area registered under the Historic Places Act The Frankton Junction Railway Settlement Historic Area is registered as an historic area. For a non-notified resource consent application, for any development relating to a historic area registered under the Historic Places Trust Act 1993, consultation with the New Zealand Historic Places Trust is recommended before an application is submitted to Council and Council may then require that written approval be obtained from the Trust. For a fuller understanding of the notification requirements of the Resource Management Act 1991, reference should be made to the Act itself, in particular sections 93 and 94. Advisory Note Hamilton East Villa Precinct The provisions of the Villa Precinct apply to the Villa properties marked on Appendix 2.4-1c. For those unmarked properties located within the area of the Villa Precinct and for non-villas (in respect of dwellings) situated on Villa properties, the provisions of the Hamilton East Residential Zone shall apply A Activities in the Frankton Railway Village Heritage Precinct a) Permitted Activities The following activities are Permitted Activities provided they comply with the standards in Rule Minor work on railway houses Changes to the interior of a railway house Alterations or additions (other than minor work) to any area other than the streetscape exterior or any railway house b) Controlled Activities The following activities are Controlled Activities provided they comply with the standards in Rule 2.4.2, and will be controlled in respect of the matters identified. Accessory buildings - with respect to design and external appearance of buildings New detached dwellings and relocated buildings - with respect to design and external appearance of buildings. c) Discretionary Activities The following activities are Discretionary Activities. Demolition of any railway house November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule 2.4-2

3 Alterations or additions (other than minor work) to the streetscape exterior of any railway house Relocation of any railway house (unless relocated within the site or precinct) New buildings or additions or alteration to existing buildings within Railway Park - Lt 1 DPS d) Non-Complying Activities The following activities are Non-Complying Activities. Apartment buildings Comprehensive Residential Developments Community Centres Education and Training Facilities Health Care Services Offices Visitor Accommodation Marae Papakainga Places of Assembly 2.4.1B Activities in the Hayes Paddock Heritage Precinct a) Permitted Activities The following activities are Permitted Activities provided they comply with the standards in Rule Minor work on any building. Changes to the interior of any building. Alterations or additions (other than minor work) to any part of a building other than the streetscape exterior. Ancillary Flat. Accessory Buildings. b) Discretionary Activities The following activities are Discretionary Activities. One detached dwelling. Alteration, demolition or removal or any structure or building on Lot 228 DP SP29. Any new building on a vacant site. November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule 2.4-3

4 Apartment Buildings. Comprehensive Residential Developments. Residential Centres. Second and subsequent detached dwellings on a site. Visitor Accommodation. c) Non Complying Activities The following are Non Complying activities. Demolition or removal of any original state house or part thereof. Demolition or removal of any building within the suburban centre zone. The creation of new lots through the amalgamation of land titles C Activities in the Hamilton East Villa Heritage Precinct a) Permitted Activities The following activities are Permitted Activities provided they comply with the standards in Rules 4.1B.2 and 4.1B.3. Minor work on any building. Changes to the interior of any building. Restoration or reconstruction of the exterior elevations provided the work is consistent with verifiable evidence of the original design. b) Restricted Discretionary Activities The following is a Restricted Discretionary Activities provided it complies with the standards in Rules 4.1B.2. New detached dwellings. - with discretion restricted to siting, design and appearance c) Discretionary Activities The following activities are Discretionary Activities. Alterations and additions to a Villa Demolition and Removal of a Villa 2.4.1D Activities in the The Temple Heritage Precinct November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule 2.4-4

5 a) Permitted Activities The following activities are Permitted Activities provided they comply with the standards in Rules 2.4.2, and 4.6.3: Any activity which is a Permitted Activity under Rule 4.6.1a) Minor work on any building. Repair and maintenance of any private road, track or car park area. Changes to the interior of any building. Alterations and additions to any building except the Temple and Visitor Centre. Painting and repainting of buildings, parts of buildings and other structures. Demolition or removal of an Accessory building. External illumination of buildings and grounds. b) Restricted Discretionary Activities The following are Restricted Discretionary Activities. Tree Planting With discretion limited to siting Tree Removal With discretion limited to siting and appearance Demolition or removal of any building except Accessory Buildings, the Temple, Visitor Centre and Temple President s house. With discretion limited to the visual effects of the removal or demolition. Demolition or removal of the formal Temple entrance landscape elements including steps, planting boxes, retaining walls and topiary shrubs between the Temple and Visitor Centre. - With discretion limited to the visual effects of the removal or demolition. Contouring and modification of the landform. - With discretion limited to siting, appearance and effects on archaeological deposits or features. c) Discretionary Activities The following activities are Discretionary Activities. Demolition or removal of the Visitor Centre or Temple President s house. The construction of additional private roads, tracks or car park areas. Additional buildings. Alterations and additions to the Temple or Visitor Centre. d) Non-Complying Activities November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule 2.4-5

6 The following activities are Non-Complying Activities. Demolition or removal of the Temple. Alteration, demolition or removal of the boundary wall to Tuhikaramea Road. Any activity not provided for as a Permitted, Restricted Discretionary or Discretionary Activity in Rule 2.4.1D, or a Permitted Activity in Rule a) General Standards The following general standards apply to all Permitted, Controlled and Restricted Discretionary Activities, except in the Temple Heritage Precinct, and in the Hamilton East Villa Precinct where the standards of the Hamilton East Residential Zone apply. a) Density Each residential unit shall be contained within a minimum net site area of 600m². b) Site Coverage Maximum amount of the site which can be covered by buildings is 35% of the net site area in the Frankton Railway Village Heritage Precinct. c) Building Height i. Maximum height of buildings shall be 5m in the Frankton Railway Village Precinct. ii. Maximum height of buildings shall be 6m in the Hayes Paddock Heritage Precinct. d) Building Stories Buildings shall be of no more than one storey in the Frankton Railway Village Heritage Precinct. e) Setback From Road Boundary i. Buildings shall be set back 5m from the road boundary in the Frankton Railway Village Heritage Precinct. ii. Within the Hayes Paddock Area no part of any new building, structure, alteration or extension shall extend forward of the principal rear wall of a dwelling as originally constructed (See figure 2.4-1b). f) Fencing i) Maximum height of front yard fences shall be 1.2m. ii) Maximum height of 1.2m shall apply to fencing along the side boundary until a point in line with the front facade of the dwelling (See Figure 2.4-1) a Specific Standards The following Specific Standards apply in the Temple Heritage Precinct, in addition to any standards within Rules and 4.6.3: a) Colour November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule 2.4-6

7 New buildings or alterations or the painting or repainting of any building or structure shall be in a colour that is as close a match as possible to the characteristic cream used extensively throughout the Temple Heritage Precinct and adjoining Church College Character Area. b) Repairs and Maintenance i) The redecoration, restoration or repair of fabric or detailing shall use materials having the same appearance in terms of texture and colour as those originally used. ii) The repair and maintenance of private roads, tracks and car parking areas shall retain the characteristic sealed surface and kerb edge. d) Height i) No part of any new or extended building or structure shall be higher than the floor level of the Temple b Public Notification Resource consent applications for Restricted Discretionary Activities, or for activities that become Restricted Discretionary activities as a result of Rule c), will be processed without the need for public notification or service of notice in accordance with Section 95A(1) of the Act except in special circumstances referred to in Section 95A(2) and 95D of the Act Failure to Meet Standards a) Activities within the Frankton Railway Village Heritage Precinct which do not comply with one or two performance standards in Rule are Restricted Discretionary Activities, with discretion restricted to the subject matter of the standard that can not be met. Activities within the Hayes Paddock Heritage Precinct which do not comply with one or more performance standards in Rule 2.4.2, or are Discretionary Activities. b) b) Activities within the Frankton Railway Village Heritage Precinct which do not comply with three or more standards in Rule are Discretionary Activities. c) Permitted Activities within the Temple Heritage Precinct which do not comply with one performance standard in Rule 2.4.2a are Restricted Discretionary Activities with discretion restricted to the subject matter of the standard that can not be met. Activities which do not comply with two or more performance standards in Rule 2.4.2a are Discretionary Activities. Performance Assessment In determining any resource consent, Council shall have regard to the expected outcome for this rule and the relevant underlying zone, to any related objectives and policies, and to the following. In respect of the Hamilton East Villa Heritage Precinct, Council shall have regard to the provisions for the Hamilton East Residential Zone Performance Outcomes Controlled Activities November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule 2.4-7

8 In assessing a resource consent for a Controlled Activity, Council can impose conditions on the following matters. a) Design and External Appearance of Buildings within the Frankton Railway Village Precinct i) The building should maintain the characteristic setback of buildings from the road. ii) iii) The design of buildings should be compatible with the materials, form, height and bulk of the surrounding railway houses, generally being single storey with a low pitched gable roof. The front door of a detached dwelling or main door of an accessory building should be orientated towards the street. iv) Coverage of the front setback by buildings should be minimised Assessment Criteria Restricted Discretionary Activities and Discretionary Activities Restricted Discretionary Activities will be assessed only in respect of the subject matter of the standard with which the activity was unable to comply. Discretionary Activities will be assessed against, but not limited to, the assessment criteria below. a) General Criteria i) Whether the proposal has adverse effects on the heritage precinct and whether measures have been taken to avoid, remedy or mitigate potential adverse effects. ii) iii) Whether the proposed activity significantly detracts from the heritage values identified for the heritage precinct. Whether the proposed work is necessary, considering available alternatives. iv) Whether the building can be relocated on or off the site, the impact that the relocation would have on the identified heritage values and/or whether the relocation of the building would mitigate potential adverse effects identified. v) The extent to which the proposed activity will detract from the heritage values or features of the precinct and the extent to which this will effect the heritage fabric of the city. vi) The extent to which the proposed activity retains or is compatible to the style or character (eg. maintaining building form, building materials or design) identified for the heritage precinct and/or the extent to which this could be achieved through any alternatives. vii) Whether the proposed activity will significantly impact on the streetscape appearance of the heritage precinct. viii) The extent to which the proposed activity will positively encourage the protection and ongoing maintenance of the heritage precinct. November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule 2.4-8

9 ix) Whether the proposed activity will require the removal of any vegetation in the Frankton Railway Village (particularly mature trees) and the extent to which this can be avoided, remedied or mitigated. x) Any immediate or cumulative effects resulting from the activity on the number, range and quality of heritage features and characteristics in the precinct. b) Specific Criteria Relating to Frankton Railway Village Whether any new building or addition or alteration to an existing building in Railway Park is compatible with the material, form and design of the surrounding residential development and existing buildings within Railway Park, in particular the Railway Institute Hall. c) Specific Criteria Relation to Hayes Paddock In relation to proposed demolition and removal: i). Whether it has been clearly demonstrated that demolition of a dwelling is necessary, considering available alternatives including renovation and refurbishment, limiting the extent of demolition works or relocation of the dwelling elsewhere on the site or within the Precinct. ii). Where demolition or removal from the site is demonstrated to be the only practicable option, whether a photographic and documentary heritage record of the property has been provided to Council. iii). Whether resource consent exists for the redevelopment of the site in a manner that will reflect historic heritage values in the Precinct. iv). The extent to which there is certainty regarding the timing of redevelopment of the site. v). The extent to which the opportunity is provided for the salvage and reuse of original materials. In relation to proposed alterations and extensions: vi). Whether the proposed works will retain or reflect the architectural form of the original dwelling in terms of proportions, style, design detailing, fenestration, materials and finishes. vii). Whether works affecting the roof will retain the form, lines, materials and pitch of the roof of the original dwelling. viii). The extent to which the development either individually or cumulatively with other developments within the front and side yards of properties in the area will detract from the relationship between dwellings, or their relationship as a group with the streetscene. ix). The extent to which the proposed works will provide the opportunity for the restoration or reintroduction of original design features. November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule 2.4-9

10 x). The extent to which the design and scale of the proposed works will ensure that the original dwelling and its historic heritage values will remain the dominant feature in the streetscene. In relation to proposed new activities, buildings and structures: xi). Whether the proposal will be in keeping with the historic heritage character of the Precinct in terms of size, scale, architectural form, design detailing and intensity of development and subsequent occupation. xii). The extent to which front and side elevation details including the roof, will be sympathetic to the design, fenestration, materials and finishes of neighbouring original dwellings. xiii). The extent to which new buildings or structures will reflect the characteristic separation of original dwellings including their open aspect to the streetscene. xiv). The extent to which the siting and design of development will enhance the historic heritage group value of properties and their relationship to the streetscene. xv). Whether the level of intensity of development or subsequent operation of a proposal will give rise to visual or operational effects that would significantly adversely affect the low density, residential character of the neighbourhood. xvi). The extent to which car parking, servicing, security lighting and signage requirements for an activity would adversely affect the visual relationship between a building, particularly an original dwelling, and the streetscene. In relation to proposed subdivision: xvii). The extent to which the site design is consistent with those sites in Hayes Paddock initially developed during the late 1930 s and early 1940 s. xviii). The extent to which the spaciousness, low density character the original subdivision concept for the area is maintained. d) Specific Criteria Relating to the Hamilton East Villa Precinct In relation to proposed demolition and removal: i) Whether it has been clearly demonstrated that demolition of a Villa is necessary, considering available alternatives including renovation and refurbishment, limiting the extent of demolition works or relocation of the Villa elsewhere on the site or within the Precinct. ii) Where demolition or removal from the site is demonstrated to be the only practicable option, whether a photographic and documentary heritage record of the property has been provided to Council. November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule

11 iii) Whether resource consent exists for the redevelopment of the site in a manner that will reflect historic heritage values in the Precinct. iv) The extent to which there is certainty regarding the timing of redevelopment of the site. v) The extent to which the opportunity is provided for the salvage and reuse of original materials. In relation to proposed alterations and extensions: i) Whether the proposed works will retain or reflect the architectural style of the original Villa in terms of building form, building elements, proportions, original design detailing, fenestration, materials and finishes. ii) Whether works affecting the roof will retain the gable facing the street, its form, lines, materials, original detailing and pitch of the roof of the original Villa. iii) The extent to which the proposed works will provide the opportunity for the retention, restoration or reconstruction of original design features. iv) The extent to which the design and scale of the proposed works will ensure that the original Villa and its historic heritage values will remain the dominant feature. In relation to proposed new activities, buildings and structures (siting, design and appearance): i) Whether the proposal will be in keeping with the historic heritage character of the Precinct in terms of location, size, scale, architectural form, design detailing and intensity of development and subsequent occupation. ii) The extent to which new buildings or structures will reflect the characteristic separation of original dwellings including their open aspect to the street. iii) The extent to which the siting and design of development will enhance the historic heritage group value of properties. e) Specific criteria relating to the Temple View Heritage Precinct i) Whether the removal of trees would adversely affect the landscape setting of the Temple. ii) Whether the planting of additional tree areas would adversely affect the landscape setting of the Temple. iii) Whether the creation of additional private roads, tracks or car parking areas would adversely affect the planted landscape setting of the Temple. November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule

12 iv) The extent to which new buildings and structures can be accommodated without interrupting the space between the Temple, Temple President s house, the internal east/west access road fronting the Visitor Centre and Tuhikaramea Road. v) Whether new buildings would have significant adverse effects on views of the Temple. vi) In the case of demolition, whether it has been clearly demonstrated that there are no alternatives for the refurbishment or reuse of the building for activities that are compatible with the character and values of the Heritage Precinct. vii) Whether works to a building would adversely affect the consistency of colour and materials that are used extensively throughout the Precinct. viii) Whether works to a road, track or car park area continue the consistent use of materials and kerb edging used throughout the Precinct. ix) The extent to which any excavation, modification or disturbance of the ground would have significant adverse effects on views of the Temple, including any consequential effects on existing tree stands. x) The extent to which provision has been made for the investigation, recording or preservation of any archaeological deposits or features. Figure Front Yard Fencing November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule

13 November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule

14 Appendix 2.4 I Frankton Railway Village Heritage Precinct November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule

15 Appendix 2.4-1a Hayes paddock Heritage Precinct November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule

16 Appendix 2.4 1b Set Back Lines within Hayes Paddock November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule

17 Hamilton City Appendix 2.4 1c Hamilton East Villa Heritage Precinct November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule

18 Hamilton City Appendix 2.4 1d The Temple Heritage Precinct November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule

19 Appendix 2.4 II Precinct Characteristics The heritage values and characteristics of the Frankton Railway Village, Hayes Paddock and Hamilton East Villa Heritage Precincts are discussed in more detail below. Frankton Railway Village Precinct The Frankton Railway Village Precinct lies to the east of Rifle Range Road between Massey Street, Pukeko Street and Lincoln Street. The Frankton Railway Village is one of the last and largest remaining railway settlements in the country and is considered nationally significant. It represents an historical reminder of one of the busiest railway junctions in New Zealand. The area has been identified as worthy of protection for the following heritage characteristics: The area provides a relatively unmodified example of a planned railway settlement, representing design elements of the garden suburb movement, fashionable at that time (with the hall and central open space for workers); There are a number of examples of the different design variations on the railway house, which is a basic villa design, with front porch, horizontal weather boarding, and galvanised corrugated iron roofing; Predominantly separate single storey residential dwellings; Consistent building setback from the street frontage with houses orientated to the street. Hayes Paddock The Hayes Paddock Precinct is situated generally between the Waikato River and MacFarlane Street. The Precinct is a surviving example of a former state housing area designed and built by the first Labour Government in the late 1930 s-early 1940 s following the design principles of the Garden Suburb movement. The layout of the neighbourhood and design of individual houses reflected the economic circumstances and social ideals of the time in terms of the provision of high quality worker housing. The area has been identified as worthy of protection for the following heritage characteristics: The area provides a relatively intact example of a planned state housing neighbourhood providing high quality worker housing constructed prior to 1945 and following contemporary design elements of the Garden City movement. These dwellings are described as original dwellings in the Overlay provisions. Dwellings exhibit a wide variety of design detailing but retain a high degree of visual unity through common use of a limited palette of materials and colours. Dwellings are typically but not exclusively single storey with solid hipped and tiled roofing. November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule

20 The relatively narrow curving street pattern with berms and street trees discourages through traffic and reinforces a distinct residential character. Services, including electricity supply and telephone lines are underground. Walkways provide connectivity between streets and the recreational reserve areas. The location of the existing café and access to the riverside reserve at Jellicoe Drive and Plunkett Terrace reflects the historical focal point of the Precinct, being the location of the original shop units. The area still displays the original characteristic setback and separation between dwellings. The design concept that the streetscene comprising the road, berms, gardens and dwellings should be viewed as a whole is still clearly evident. Section sizes are typically around 600m 2 creating a distinctly low density residential character. Hamilton East Villa Precinct The Villa Precinct is situated on Firth Street between Albert Street and Naylor Street and three houses to the west of Firth on Albert Street. The precinct has a high concentration of Villa styled houses and has historical significance as it reflects the popularity of the villa throughout Hamilton East in the late Victorian and Edwardian periods. The dates of the villas constructed in the precinct are between 1891 and The area has been identified as worthy of protection for the following heritage characteristics: Consistency with the Villa style, including a main gable facing the street, with ornate decoration in and/or supporting the gable, under eaves and on verandahs. Main entrance facing the street to the side of the street front bay or gable. Buildings are predominantly single storey. Consistent building setback from the street frontage with houses orientated to the street. Buildings are constructed with a timber frame, weatherboards and joinery with predominantly corrugated iron roofs. Most buildings have double hung sash windows. Most buildings have bays or double bays. Most Villas have verandahs. The Temple Precinct The Temple Heritage Precinct is situated to the east of Tuhikaramea Road The Site comprises a low hill on the edge of the Rukuhia swamp that was previously occupied as a papakainga, then developed as a farmstead, prior to the redevelopment of the site during the 1950 s to establish the Temple. The Precinct is significant for its social history as well as the physical features that remain and continue in active use. The Temple, together with the adjoining Church November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule

21 College, was constructed entirely by Labour Missionaries from materials that were largely produced on the adjacent Church College site. The Temple itself is also identified as a Heritage Item in its own right. It was the first and is still the only Temple in New Zealand and is the focus for Church members throughout the country. The Precinct also includes Significant Trees and Archaeological features that are individually identified through the Plan. The Temple Precinct has been identified as worthy of protection for the following heritage characteristics: The buildings use locally produced materials by a Labour Missionary programme established by the Church in conjunction with the construction of the adjacent Church college. The buildings are a physical reminder of the contribution that the Church has made to the training and spiritual development, particularly of the Maori community. The Temple has an inseparable connection with the local community. The siting, design and colour of the Temple on the crest of the hill provides a dramatic feature that is evident in short and long distance views. It is a physical landmark within the City and a social landmark of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints within New Zealand. The buildings and surrounding curtilage walling have a consistency of materials and colour that retains a high degree of visual unity. The unity is reinforced through the consistent treatment of internal private roads and car parking areas. The landscaped grounds include trees that predate the development of the Temple, and others that are a reminder of previous European and Maori occupation of the site. Additional stands of trees add maturity and distinction to the site against the painted cream backdrop of the Temple itself, but despite their age, size and extent, they are secondary in significance to views of the Temple itself. The site has been the subject of long standing, though intermittent, occupation dating back to pre-european times. November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule

22 Appendix 2.4-III Categories for Management The following categories were used to assess the significance of heritage precincts. Geographic Significance Geographic extent of a heritage precinct s significance. For this purpose, four categories have been identified: 1: Heritage precinct whose value is derived from their national significance 2: Heritage precincts which is significant to the region 3: Heritage precincts which has significance in terms of their relevance to the City 4: Heritage precincts which have local / neighbourhood significance. Heritage Features / Characteristics The assessment of heritage precincts identifies its significance in terms of the following categories: a: Social / Historical: The extent to which the precinct reflects the history of Hamilton, the Waikato or New Zealand with either a strong association with a significant person or persons or reflective of social or economic patterns of its time. b: Traditional / Cultural / Spiritual: The extent to which the spiritual importance. For example, the area may have symbolic importance (eg. a naming place, sacred site or symbolic feature) or commemorative importance (eg. a memorial site). c: Technological: The importance of the precinct as a reflection or representation of significant technological development. d: Setting / Aesthetic / Landscape: The extent to which the precinct contributes to the identity of the neighbourhood or surrounding area, either as a component of the landscape or as an identity in its own right. e: Architectural: The importance of the precinct as an example of a notable design style, architectural technique, or design feature or as an important example of the work of a notable architect, builder, designer. f: Consistency: The extent to which the precinct is consistently reflects the significant heritage values identified. For example, the geographical extent to which the historical values are preserved (both in terms of the buildings and structures themselves and the spaces or surrounds between these structures) which adds to the significance of the individual heritage buildings or structures. November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule

23 Appendix 2.4 IV Heritage Precincts Schedule ID# Heritage Precinct Address Geographic Heritage Significance features / characteristics New Zealand Historic Places Trust Registration P1 Frankton Railway Village See Appendix 2.4-I 1 a c d e f Frankton Junction Railway Settlement Historic Area 1 Planning Map No. 10 P2 Hayes Paddock See Appendix 2.4-1a 1 A c d e f = 11,15 P3 Hamilton East Villa See Appendix 2.4-1b 3 A, c, d, e, f - 12 Precinct P4 The Temple Precinct See Appendix 2.4-1d 1 a b c d f NB. The NZHPT Historic Area is broader than the Frankton Railway Village Heritage Precinct. November 2009 Heritage Precincts Overlay Rule