Contact Name: Jennifer Hoppa or Wilbert Woods, NYC DCP, Waterfront & Open Space Division
|
|
- Christina Wood
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BOROUGH: Manhattan MAP ID# C4 COUNCIL DISTRICTS: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 COMMUNITY BOARDS: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 NAME OF PLAN: Comprehensive Manhattan Waterfront Plan Community Organization: Manhattan Borough President s Office Address: One Centre St., 19 th Fl., New York, NY Contact Name: Jennifer Hoppa or Wilbert Woods, NYC DCP, Waterfront & Open Space Division Phone Number: / TYPE OF PLAN: Waterfront Revitalization and Access Plan GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF PLAN: Manhattan s waterfront NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN/BACKGROUND: For more than 300 years, commerce and industry dominated Manhattan s waterfront, helping make New York the nation s largest, most economically important and most international city. The great heyday of New York as a port city has long since passed and one unfortunate result has been the shortsighted failure to capitalize on the waterfront s enduring advantages and appeal. More than a dozen City, State and Federal agencies now control various parts of the waterfront. In some cases, several of these agencies have developed worthwhile plans for portions of the waterfront; however, these plans have not been made to fit into a larger vision for the borough. The multiplicity of agencies involved on the waterfront also produces a jurisdictional jumble that contributes to many of the waterfront s current problems: its intermittent disrepair and decay; the unnecessary use of the prime waterfront locations for such eyesores as bus garages and parking lots; the granting of leases to private users that do not sufficiently protect public access to the waterfront; and, most tellingly, the lack of a coordinated effort to exploit the waterfront s rich and varied potential. GOALS OF PLAN: Develop a continuous waterfront esplanade around Manhattan with public access. Redevelopment of the waterfront for water-related commercial, educational, and transportation activities. RECOMMENDATIONS: The following is a sample of site-specific recommendations posited by the plan: Lower Manhattan (Community District 1) - Planning for Battery Park improvements should provide for a clear pedestrian link between the park s esplanade and the newly redesigned Whitehall Ferry Terminal. - If structurally and financially feasible, at least a portion of the Battery Maritime Building should be devoted to public, cultural, and commercial uses that would complement the redevelopment of Piers 9-12 and reconstruction of the ferry terminal.
2 East River Waterfront (Community Districts 3, 6, and 8) - Improve pedestrian access to East River Park as part of the FDR reconstruction. - Implement ISTEA-funded improvement of the 35 th Street Pier to accommodate a ferry landing and public access (ferry services are currently provided at East 34 th Street). - Using private and/or public funding sources, create a waterfront gateway along the Queensboro Bridge corridor by redeveloping spaces on the north side of 59 th Street between Second Avenue and the East 60 th Street Pavilion Park and esplanade. Upper East River/Harlem River Waterfront (Community Districts 11 and 10) - To improve access from East Harlem to Randall s Island recreational facilities - Work toward obtaining construction funds to implement plans for a park and esplanade between 125 th and 142 nd Streets (Harlem Beach). Northern Manhattan Waterfront (Community District 12) - Implement Department of Parks and Recreation access plans for Fort Washington Park as funds become available. - Construct a link between Fort Washington and Riverside Parks. Hudson River Waterfront (Community Districts 9 and 7) - Consider Scenic Landmark designation of the portion of the Riverside Park above 135 th Street. - In planning for the Harlem Piers, recognize their importance as a major catalyst for the economic revitalization of the neighborhood. - Support plans for a bicycle/pedestrian path through Riverside Park. Hudson River Waterfront (Community Districts 4 and 2) - Pier 76, currently excluded from the Hudson River Park, should be included in the park. - The poor condition of the sanitation facility detracts from the overall Greenwich Village waterfront area. DOS should maintain the structure and clean the entrance area on a regular basis. - Any long-term uses proposed for Pier 40 should be water-dependent or water-enhancing. Residential, office and hotel development, mega-stores, and parking do not represent a desirable strategy for generating revenue from the Pier. IDENTIFIED STEPS FOR IMPLEMENTATION: - Change current City leasing and concession policies to generate greater revenue for waterfront improvements while reinforcing a commitment to reopening the waterfront to public access and appropriate water-enhancing and -dependent uses. - Refining the City s new waterfront zoning regulations to strengthen the goal of public access and appropriate use. - Creating a waterfront open space fund similar to the East Rive Esplanade fund to fund the maintenance of new waterfront open space. - Create an enforcement entity to guarantee waterfront improvement completion and availability. - Consider issues of security in areas of waterfront development. PARTNERS: The plan involved hundreds of people, including members of all Manhattan s waterfront Community Boards (1-12), as well as representatives from a broad range of public agencies including the Department of City Planning (DCP), the Economic Development Corporation (EDC), the Department of Parks and Recreation, and the Department of Transportation (DOT), environmental and civic organizations including the 125 th Street Local Development Corporation, Chelsea Waterside Park Association, Citizens for a Hudson River Esplanade, CIVITAS, Environmental Action Coalition, Federation to Preserve the Greenwich Village Waterfront and
3 Great Port, Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, Neighborhood Open Space Coalition, Parks Council, and Regional Plan Association, and the maritime industries. PARTICIPATORY PROCESS: This plan grew out of the work of the Manhattan Waterfront Task Force, an effort initiated in 1990 by the Manhattan Borough President s office and consisting of representatives of Community Boards, civic organizations and public agencies with waterfront interests. A draft plan was released in February 1992 and circulated widely among local elected officials, businesses, and community groups and the input received was subsequently incorporated in the updated version of the plan. Community boards played an active role in providing information for the plan. OBSTACLES: 1. Long term leases have already been issued for non-water dependent or water-enhancing issues. 2. Finding Sites to relocate city services on the waterfront 3. Securing capital funding to make all waterfront improvements and to make connections to the continuous esplanade throughout Manhattan. These factors along with the multiplicity of agencies involved on the waterfront make it a difficult and long process to execute projects. 4. Maintenance dollars are lacking. TIMELINE INITIAL IDEA: 1990 FORMAL PLAN? Yes DATE SUBMITTED: 1995 SUBMITTED TO: Department of City Planning CITY ACTION? Adopted April 16, 1997 MODIFICATIONS MADE TO PLAN: City Council modified and adopted the 197-a plan as modified by the City Planning Commission. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 1. Construction is ongoing at Stuyvesant Cove, Harlem Piers, and Hudson River Park. Plan provides a rationale to acquire funding for different projects and serves a defense against certain developments. 2. Bikeway connections are in place between Hudson River Park and Riverside South, with planning underway for connections to East River Park. Fort Washington Park has been linked to Riverside Park and planning for improvements to the bikeway is in progress. 3. The plan provides a rationale to secure funding for various projects and serves as a defense against certain developments. NEIGHBORHOOD/PLAN BACKGROUND The proposal for Stuyvesant Cove has grown out of its unique character and situation. Its natural curved shoreline, a break in the straight linear shoreline to the north and south, presents an opportunity to explore the possibilities of a back-water on the edge of the city, sheltered from the busy commercial district by quite residential communities and medical complexes. GOALS OF PLAN 1. Development of easily accessible public park and open space at the waterfront 2. To encourage water-dependent uses that are compatible with the open space goals of Community Board 6 3. Consistency with planning goals of the Department of City Planning and the Borough President
4 RECOMMENDATIONS The 197-a plan proposes a waterfront park between East 18th and 23rd Streets as part of Stuyvesant Cove, a small bay that extends along the East River waterfront between East 16th Street on the south, East 24th Street on the north and Avenue C on the west. The site contains a gas station, a 515-car parking garage, a 36-slip marina, and surface parking for approximately 428 cars under the FDR Drive and 297 cars along the water's edge. Most of the property is owned by the City and leased for these uses. Based on the goals above, the plan presents a detailed design and programmatic proposal with the following major elements: Develop a 1.9-acre park at the Stuyvesant Cove site. Reconfigure the existing conditions of the site to allow for the most generous waterfront space possible, including the realignment of Marginal Road, either under the FDR Drive's Avenue C viaduct or to the west of it; and the elimination of parking on the pier and along the bulkhead. Enhance the riverbank and build up the "rocky outcrop". Create a pedestrian esplanade and bikeway to extend the length of the park and connect (both north and the south) to the continuous esplanade/bikeway planned for the entire borough. Remove or relocate the service station at the 23rd Street entrance. Create an open plaza entrance to the park at 23rd Street with views to the water. Redesign the existing marina. Moor a lawn barge and a sand or beach barge to the redesigned pier area. Provide suitable plantings throughout the site. Enhance connections and entry points to inboard communities and open a means of egress from Waterside Plaza to the south (to 23rd Street). As opportunities allow, develop economic components to generate revenue to fund the ongoing maintenance of the park. The study proposes: a rooftop restaurant on the Skyport garage building and, possibly, a recreational facility there, continued parking within the Skyport garage (and possibly elsewhere on the site); an ecology center and café, a kayak boathouse with concessionaire. IDENTIFIED STEPS FOR IMPLEMENTATION 1. Develop a reconstruction plan for the waterfront with the State Department of Transportation when it abandons its waterfront staging area used for the FDR Drive reconstruction. 2. Develop northbound FDR Drive exit roadway alternatives along Avenue C, and implement the realigned roadway as an integral part of the Stuyvesant Cove project. 3. Work to develop a Request for Proposal (RFP) proposal with the Economic Development Corporation (EDC) to implement the park construction, including parking alternatives. 4. Recognizing the fiscal constraints faced by the City, CB 6 voted strongly to pursue federal ISTEA funding, and all other sources of private or public funding for park elements that would reduce the amount of commercial development insisted necessary for the financial support to pay for the park. PARTICIPATORY PROCESS Since the 1970s, the residents of Manhattan Community Board 6 have envisioned a park at Stuyvesant Cove. The immediate impetus to prepare plans came as a community response to the now-defunct Riverwalk, a large residential and commercial development proposed for construction on platforms at this East River site. Community and citywide pressure to halt the project resulted in moves to prepare alternative plans that were more acceptable to the community and to the city. Following the withdrawal of the River Walk proposal, Community Board Six took the initiative to form a Stuyvesant Cove Ad Hoc Committee. The committee comprised of only board members, but representatives of groups and interests from the community at large. The committee set about defining the scope of the open space study, which
5 became the subject of an RFP issued by the Board. In designing the project, the requirement for public participation was high among the priorities and the ability to work with the public was one of the criteria used in choosing the consultants, Heintz/Ruddick. The committee held regularly scheduled meetings, all of which were open to the public with notification through the Board's regular channels and beyond. A number of presentations were held while the consultants did their studies. Various design proposals were outlined and public reaction was aired. Through this process of give-and-take, the design elements were refined to those presented in the draft report. The Open Space Study was the subject of a public hearing before the Board on June 9, 1993 and, as always, the public was offered every opportunity to speak and comment on its findings. The Board officially adopted the study on June 16, PARTNERS Manhattan Community Board 6, New York City Economic Development Corporation (EDC), local elected officials OBSTACLES Construction of the park was delayed by Con Ed plans for their plant along the river. TIMELINE INITIAL IDEA 1990 FORMAL PLAN? YES DATE SUBMITTED: 1995 SUBMITTED TO: Department of City Planning CITY ACTION? MODIFICATIONS MADE TO PLAN The original plan called for the inclusion of both an environmental center and a commercial component to cover the security and maintenance expenses of the park. The original proposal for a rooftop restaurant on the Skyport garage building was found to be structurally infeasible. A second proposal to have the restaurant located on the pier was not approved by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC). The final proposal called for the inclusion of a non-profit environmental center that would be held responsible for security and maintenance of the park. This proposal was included in the RFP. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The park is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in the fall of 2001.
Contact Name: Jennifer Hoppa or Wilbert Woods, NYC DCP, Waterfront & Open Space Division
BOROUGH: Manhattan MAP ID# C4 COUNCIL DISTRICTS: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 COMMUNITY BOARDS: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 NAME OF PLAN: Comprehensive Manhattan Waterfront Plan Community Organization:
More informationBOROUGH Manhattan MAP ID# M7 COUNCIL DISTRICT 7 COMMUNITY BOARD 9. NAME OF PLAN: Sharing Diversity Through Community Action
BOROUGH Manhattan MAP ID# M7 COUNCIL DISTRICT 7 COMMUNITY BOARD 9 NAME OF PLAN: Sharing Diversity Through Community Action Community Organization: Manhattan Community Board 9 Address 565 West 125th Street,
More informationGEOGRAPHIC AREA OF PLAN The South Street Seaport Historic District encompasses a nine-block area around Fulton Street.
BOROUGH Manhattan MAP ID# M1 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 COMMUNITY BOARD: 1 NAME OF PLAN Community Organization: Manhattan Community Board 1 Address 49 Chambers Street, Suite 715, New York City, New York 10007
More informationGEOGRAPHIC AREA OF PLAN The area includes East 125th Street from 2nd Avenue to the Triborough Bridge, and 127th Street at the Harlem River.
BOROUGH Manhattan MAP ID# M9 COUNCIL DISTRICT 8 COMMUNITY BOARD: 11 NAME OF PLAN: East 125th Street Enhancement Study Community Organization CIVITAS Address 1457 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10128
More informationBOROUGH Manhattan MAP ID# M8 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 COMMUNITY BOARD: 11 NAME OF PLAN. Community Organization: Community Board 11 and CIVITAS
BOROUGH Manhattan MAP ID# M8 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 COMMUNITY BOARD: 11 NAME OF PLAN Community Organization: Community Board 11 and CIVITAS Address 55 East 115th Street, New York, NY 10029 Contact Name: Cora
More informationKevin M. Rampe, President -- Lower Manhattan Development Corporation
For Internal Use Only: Date Received: WRP no. DOS no. NEW YORK CITY WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM Consistency Assessment Form Proposed actions that are subject to CEQR, ULURP or other local, state
More informationCIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS CIVITAS
7. The Vision 80 East River Esplanade Vision Plan Site Specific Visions Through research, analysis, outreach, and discussions with city and state agency representatives, it became apparent that a phased,
More informationA. INTRODUCTION B. NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE
Chapter 19: Alternatives A. INTRODUCTION Over the years a variety of potential developments for the East River waterfront in Lower Manhattan have been considered. Some of these plans were very ambitious
More informationNew York City, 17 th c.
Mannahatta New York City, 17 th c. Lower Manhattan, circa 1930s Westside Highway, Manhattan, circa 1940s Greenpoint Terminal Market, Brooklyn VISION 2020 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN
More informationM i s s i o n B a y W a t e r f r o n t
114 M i s s i o n B a y W a t e r f r o n t Character of the Area: The Mission Bay Waterfront extends from Pier 48 at China Basin Channel to 18th Street in the Central Basin. This area of the waterfront
More informationManhattanville Development Proposal: Project Description
Manhattanville Development Proposal: Project Description Columbia University Community Board 9 Public Meeting, Tuesday, October 11, 2005 1 A Collaborative Process: Times and Topics Thursday, Oct. 6, 6:30
More informationMAIN STREET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
MAIN STREET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY A PATHWAY TO A BETTER POUGHKEEPSIE DRAFT Working Paper #2: Planning Strategies Submitted December 1 st, 2015 to the City of Poughkeepsie LAND USE LAW CENTER PACE
More informationScope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan
Scope of Services River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan PROJECT AREA The project area consists of the River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) corridor bounded by SH 199 at the northern end and the Trinity
More informationPORT OF SAN FRANCISCO
PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO WATERFRONT LAND USE PLAN Prop H (1990) required a Waterfront Land Use Plan Port property in BCDC jurisdiction Define Acceptable Uses Hotels prohibited on piers Prioritize Maritime
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting October 15, 2005 DATE: September 28, 2005 SUBJECT: Request to Advertise the adoption of the 2005 Clarendon Sector Plan C. M. RECOMMENDATION:
More informationEast River Waterfront Esplanade and Piers New York, New York Draft Environmental Impact Statement
East River Waterfront Esplanade and Piers New York, New York Draft Environmental Impact Statement October 12, 2006 CEQR No.: TO COME ULURP Nos.: TO COME Lead Agency: Lower Manhattan Development Corporation
More informationTOWN OF BETHLEHEM MEETING SUMMARY LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM UPDATE
TOWN OF BETHLEHEM LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM UPDATE MEETING SUMMARY Purpose: LWRP Update Public Workshop #3 Date and Time: October 24, 2017, 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm Location: Town Hall, 445 Delaware
More informationChapter 2, Section C: Urban Design and Visual Resources A. INTRODUCTION
Chapter 2, Section C: Urban Design and Visual Resources A. INTRODUCTION This attachment considers the potential of the proposed East River Waterfront Access Project at Peck Slip to effect urban design
More informationCity Center Neighborhood Plan
[1] City Center Neighborhood Plan As adopted by Ordinance No. 2014-09-049 and amended by Ordinance Nos. Formerly CBD Neighborhood as adopted by Ordinance No. 8868 and amended by Ordinance Nos. 8946, 9693,
More informationIMAGINE CLEARWATER. Community Workshop 3. November 2016
IMAGINE CLEARWATER Community Workshop 3 November 2016 Imagine Clearwater has been a 6-month community-focused process to re-envision the downtown waterfront. VISIONING FRAMEWORK MASTER PLAN HOW CAN WE
More informationDesignation Process: Step One
WATERFRONTS FLORIDA P A R T N E R S H I P P R O G R A M Community Statement of Interest Designation Process: Step One The Waterfronts Florida Partnership Program is a program of the Department of Economic
More informationNew York City, 19 th c.
New York City, 19 th c. Lower Manhattan, circa 1930s Westside Highway, Manhattan, circa 1940s Greenpoint Terminal Market, Brooklyn TRANSFORMATIONS ON THE WATERFRONT Harlem River Park, Manhattan BEFORE
More informationEast Midtown Greenway East 53 rd 61 st Street. Community Board 8 Project Introduction November 16, 2017
East Midtown Greenway East 53 rd 61 st Street Community Board 8 Project Introduction November 16, 2017 Agenda Overview - Development of the East Midtown Waterfront Esplanade Current East Midtown Greenway
More informationCity of Tacoma Planning and Development Services
Agenda Item D-1 City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services To: Planning Commission From: Elliott Barnett, Planning Services Division Subject: Application #2014-08 Open Space Element Update Meeting
More informationNorthwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS
4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS Each station is different, and each one requires a separate set of recommendations based on the vision for the site. This section outlines an initial TOD strategy and recommendations
More informationMARINA MARKET & WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT STUDY PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS
MARINA MARKET & WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT STUDY PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS FEBRUARY 2015 PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 REGIONAL POSITIONING SITE IMPRESSIONS PLANNING & DESIGN PRINCIPLES EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS
More informationNYC Parks by the Numbers
Designing NYC Parks NYC Parks by the Numbers 30,000 acres of land 14% of New York City 5,000 individual properties 1,800 basketball courts 1,000 playgrounds 800 athletic fields 67 public pools 51 recreational
More informationTOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION
Workshop #3 TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION January 20, 2011 Consultant Team In Attendance Tonight BMS Design Group Nevada City and San Francisco Michael Smiley, AICP, ASLA Partner-in-Charge Nancy L.
More information3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies
Vision Statement Queen Creek s interconnected network of parks, trails, open spaces and recreation opportunities provide safe and diverse activities and programs that sustain its unique, small town, equestrian
More informationCONCLUSION AND IMPLEMENTATION
Lisbon s Vision CONCLUSION AND IMPLEMENTATION 7 Lisbon residents clearly appreciate the character, amenities, and opportunities that define our community. This Plan of Conservation and Development identifies
More informationA. INTRODUCTION B. PROJECT LOCATION
Chapter 1: Project Description A. INTRODUCTION The Lower Manhattan Development Corporation (LMDC), a subsidiary of the New York State Urban Development Corporation, doing business as the Empire State Development
More informationParks Master Plan Implementation: Phase I Waterfront Use and Design REPORT #: September 7, 2016 File #
0 'O DI Lan-171-14 1 - THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF COBOURG..,. STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: Mayor and Members of Council Dean A. Hustwick, Director of Recreation and Culture DATE OF MEETING: Committee of
More informationPARTF Scoring System for Grants
PARTF Scoring System for Grants The members of the N.C. Parks and Recreation Authority use the PARTF scoring system as one of several tools to select grant recipients. Please provide all of the information
More informationGEOGRAPHIC AREA OF PLAN Myrtle Avenue - between Flatbush Avenue Extension and Classon Avenue.
BOROUGH Brooklyn MAP ID# B9 COUNCIL DISTRICT 35 COMMUNITY BOARD 2 NAME OF PLAN Community Organization Myrtle Avenue Revitalization Project LDC Address 375 Myrtle Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11205 Contact Name
More informationANCHOR TO ANCHOR. Rescale the street to create an iconic boulevard.
ANCHOR TO ANCHOR Rescale the street to create an iconic boulevard. UR NE ER UV GO NE LA OBJECTIVES 1. Maintain appropriate traffic flow and prioritize commercial curb access 2. Mark gateways at the street
More informationB. ROLE OF THE EIS IN THE APPROVALS PROCESS
Chapter 2: Methodology A. INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and its role in the approval process for the East River Esplanade and Piers Project (the Proposed
More informationDraft Stillwater 2030 Comprehensive Plan- Goals and Policies
Draft Stillwater 2030 Comprehensive Plan- Goals and Policies Instructions- Review each goal and policy and discuss with group any changes, deletions for additions to the list using your groups pen. Keep
More informationA. INTRODUCTION. Julie Cowing 5/22/13 11:47 AM Deleted: Considered
Julie Cowing 5/22/13 11:47 AM Considered Chapter 2: Alternatives A. INTRODUCTION Under the federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (LWCFA) and applicable U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) regulations
More informationBATHURST QUAY NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. Streetscape & Public Realm Improvement Plan - Canada Malting Silo Site and Eireann Quay
BATHURST QUAY NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Streetscape & Public Realm Improvement Plan - Canada Malting Silo Site and Eireann Quay Bryan Bowen, Waterfront Secretariat November 25, 2017 Presentation
More informationESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT TOWN CENTER
ESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT TOWN CENTER 4 Overview Lisbon residents are proud of the history of Newent and at the same time recognize its current importance as a centralized location for a variety of municipal
More informationRESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension
RESOLUTION NO. R2018-32 Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Capital Committee Board PROPOSED ACTION 09/13/2018
More informationBeachside Redevelopment Committee
Beachside Redevelopment Committee DRAFT FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS MARCH 22, 2018 This is a new slide 2 This is a new slide Table of Contents I. Introduction and Overview II. III. Community Improvements and
More informationJuly 12, Columbus City Council City Hall 90 West Broad Street Columbus, OH RE: I-70/71 Columbus Crossroads Project
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 6 400 EAST WILLIAM STREET DELAWARE, OHIO 43015 800.372.7714 Columbus City Council City Hall 90 West Broad Street Columbus, OH 43215-9015 RE: I-70/71 Columbus
More informationDISCUSSION TOPIC: ST JOHNS RIVER & ITS TRIBUTARIES (BPII) 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
DISCUSSION TOPIC: ST JOHNS RIVER & ITS TRIBUTARIES (BPII) 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK St. John s River & Its Tributaries Issue Summary: The St. Johns River is an important
More informationSCARBOROUGH SUBWAY EXTENSION. Scarborough Subway Extension. Final Terms of Reference
Scarborough Subway Extension Final Terms of Reference 1 1.0 Introduction and Background 1.1 Introduction Toronto City Council recently confirmed support for an extension of the Bloor-Danforth Subway from
More informationWELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION WORKING GROUP!
WELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION WORKING GROUP! Chouteau Greenway Steering Committee and Working Groups Overview Overview January 9, 2019 Chouteau Greenway will transform
More informationPUBLIC SPACE/AMENITY PROJECTS
BUFFALO S LWRP 49 A1. Black Rock Canal Park Improvements Erie County Parks Black Rock Canal Park, Ontario and Niagara Street intersection PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Erie County s Black Rock Canal Park is 4.25
More informationLynn Waterfront Master Plan
Lynn Waterfront Master Plan Public Meeting #2 December 10th, 2018 1 Project Schedule Update September 26, 2018 December 10, 2018 Development of the Master Harbor Plan Amendment and Revised Waterfront Master
More informationEconomic Development & Housing Council Committee Comprehensive Plan Update September 20, 2005
1 Economic Development & Housing Council Committee Comprehensive Plan Update September 20, 2005 Purpose To update the Committee on the ForwardDallas! Plan, including: Status Anticipated Products Public
More informationPlan Overview. Manhattan Area 2035 Reflections and Progress. Chapter 1: Introduction. Background
Plan Overview The Manhattan Urban Area Comprehensive Plan (the Comprehensive Plan) is a joint planning initiative of the City of Manhattan, Pottawatomie County, and Riley County. The 2014 Comprehensive
More informationVillage of Fair Haven Goals & Objectives
Village of Fair Haven Goals & Objectives 1 Natural Environmental Quality & Aesthetics Embrace policies and programs that preserve and enhance the Village s natural resources, environment, water quality,
More informationSTEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES
STEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES Robin Kriesberg, Save the Sound, Inc. Thomas Halavik, US Fish and Wildlife Service Coastal Program An Initiative to Identify, Protect
More information1.1 WATERFRONT SEATTLE
1.1 WATERFRONT SEATTLE Over the past few years, the City of has been actively re-imagining the future of its Central Waterfront. The imminent replacement of the Elliott Bay Seawall and removal of the Alaskan
More informationIMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK
IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK SMART CONSERVATION THROUGH SMART GROWTH NJ LAND CONSERVATION RALLY March 22, 2014 Laurette Kratina, PP, AICP, Supervising Planner Somerset County Planning
More informationThe transportation system in a community is an
7 TRANSPORTATION The transportation system in a community is an important factor contributing to the quality of life of the residents. Without a sound transportation system to bring both goods and patrons
More informationHighland Falls Waterfront Redevelopment Feasibility Study Village Board Meeting March 20, 2017
Village Board Meeting March 20, 2017 Agenda I. Public Meeting #1 Visioning Summary II. Public Meeting #2 Comment Summary III. IV. IV. Case Study: Milton Train Station Schematic Design Concepts Schedule/Next
More informationWARM SPRINGS PARK MASTER PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS page 1.0 Introduction and Overview 1 2.0 Information Gathering 2 3.0 Conceptual Alternative Development 8 4.0 Master Plan Development 14 5.0 Construction Cost Estimates 19 LIST OF FIGURES
More informationSupport the implementation of Cape Coral's Comprehensive Plan. Protect and utilize the unique natural resources in the City.
7.0 OVERVIEW - RECOMMENDATIONS Chapter 7 The preparation of the Cape Coral Parks and Recreation Master Plan spanned a period of approximately 12 months. Plan preparation included the input of a wide range
More informationOFFICIAL CONTROLS IMPLEMENTATION LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
IMPLEMENTATION The objective of the Implementation component of the Comprehensive Plan is to identify the changes that need to be made to the official controls in order to be consistent with the Comprehensive
More informationPlanning Commission Report
Planning Commission Report To: From: Subject: Planning Commission Meeting: January 6, 2016 Agenda Item: 8-B Planning Commission David Martin, Planning & Community Development Director Introduction to the
More informationNORTH CLAYMONT AREA MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 FEBRUARY 3, 2016
NORTH CLAYMONT AREA MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 FEBRUARY 3, 2016 1. Introduction To the team and to the Plan Planning Partners The Claymont Community WILMAPCO New Castle County Claymont Renaissance
More informationEXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1
EXHIBIT A Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1 1 As amended by Resolution No. 2008-02-001(TR1R) of the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No.1, and approved to
More information1. Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Special Use Sites 2. Open Space 3. Trails
Appendix A: Park Classifications The intent of parks and recreation classifications is to aid in making acquisition and design decisions for park sites, facilities and the organization of recreation space
More informationOVERVIEW OF PLANS FOR THE JEFFERSON COUNTY COUNTRYSIDE FARM In the Context of Quality Place Characteristics
OVERVIEW OF PLANS FOR THE JEFFERSON COUNTY COUNTRYSIDE FARM In the Context of Quality Place Characteristics By Steve Grabow, Professor and Community Development Educator University of Wisconsin-Extension,
More informationStafford County Strategic Plans
Stafford County Strategic s Strategic Department Description Date Adopted Board of Supervisors Priorities Fiscal Responsibility Education Public Safety Infrastructure Economic Development Service Excellence
More informationHistoric Preservation Element
Casa Gardens by Carolyn Pelkey Historic Preservation Element Incorporated in 1928, the City of San Clemente was among the first master planned communities in the U.S. built from open grazing land. Before
More informationSmall Area Plan. South Gateway
Small Area Plan Adopted May 12, 2008 South Gateway Purpose. The South Gateway Small Area Plan defines the City s expectations for the future of the southern entrance to the City at Interstate 85 and Highway
More information5. Implementation. Challenges
5. Implementation The Campus plan builds on the work that has been done so far by the Campus Concept Committee comprised of representatives from the North End Outreach Network (NEON), the New North Citizens
More informationExecutive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor
Executive Summary NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor Transportation and Land Use Study December 2005 Prepared for: Town of Colonie Capital District Transportation Committee Prepared by: Introduction: Land use decisions
More informationShoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington
Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington Department of Ecology approval effective Adopted September 24, 2013 by Town of La Conner Ordinance No.1106 Amended May 13, 2014 by Town of La Conner
More informationCity of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004
City of Farmington Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004 Introduction Planning Background 1 Scope and Components of the Plan Amendment 2 Concept Introduction 3 Plan Concepts 3 Conceptual
More information5.2 LAND USE AND ZONING
5.2 LAND USE AND ZONING This section describes the land use and zoning of the project site and surrounding area, followed by an analysis of the potential for incompatibility or adverse impact on prevailing
More informationPublic may provide comments on the GDP within the next two weeks (December 24)
25/70 General Development Plan (GDP) Public Meeting Wednesday, December 10, 2014 6:00 8:00 P.M. District 1 Police Station Community Room 1311 W 46th Ave, Denver, CO 80211 Council Woman Montero: This particular
More informationCITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services
CITY OF PUYALLUP Development Services 333 South Meridian Puyallup WA 98371 To: City Council From: Katie Baker, AICP, Planning Division Re: South Hill Neighborhood Plan Adoption Date: (Meeting date: February
More information2017 Downtown Waterfront District Municipal Harbor Plan & Public Realm Activation Plan Supplement - February 16, 2018
Harbor Garage and New England Aquarium Throughout the Downtown Waterfront planning process and the state s consultation sessions protections and assurances for the New England Aquarium s ongoing operations
More informationRECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES GOAL R-1: DEVELOP A RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS SYSTEM AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF AN OVERALL, COUNTY-WIDE ECONOMIC
More informationMunicipal Development Plan 2013
UNIQUELY STONY PLAIN: Municipal Development Plan 2013 Quick Reference Guide What is a Municipal Development Plan (MDP)? The Town s highest-level planning document Sets the long-term vision and key themes
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019 DATE: February 15, 2019 SUBJECT: Amendment to the Master Transportation Plan (MTP) Map to add a new section of North Kansas
More informationCity of Heath. Town Center Concept
In the give-and-take of getting projects designed, financed, and approved, the famous refrain from the film Field of Dreams is heard often: if you build it, they will come. From the perspective of the
More informationCENTRAL ESTUARY PLAN AVISION FOR OAKLAND S WATERFRONT
Central Estuary Plan A VISION FOR OAKLAND S WATERFRONT Specific Plan and Environmental Assessment Presentation to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission December 9, 2009 This Afternoon s Presentation
More informationPARKS. Chapter Introduction
Chapter 4. PARKS 4.1. Introduction This Parks Element of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update provides direction and guidance, based on citizen input, in order to improve and maintain the City s existing
More informationEast Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement
East Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement Alternatives Considered Operating Plan The requirements for opening day operations versus year 2030 are based on ridership and operations. Opening day
More informationChairman and Members of the Planning and Development Committee. Thomas S. Mokrzycki, Commissioner of Planning and Building
LA.09.TOR (Toronto) DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Chairman and Members of the Planning and Development Committee Thomas S. Mokrzycki, Commissioner of Planning and Building Central Waterfront Secondary Plan
More informationCorridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program
1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works is a project within the Hennepin Community Works (HCW) program. The mission of the HCW program is to enhance how the
More informationMAKING LIVABLE AND ATTRACTIVE WATERFRONTS
MAKING LIVABLE AND ATTRACTIVE WATERFRONTS Introduction In the past twenty-five years there has been a significant transformation in the use of waterfront areas across the United States. The decline in
More information20 International Conference of The Coastal Society
th 20 International Conference of The Coastal Society SHAPING LAND USE IN FLORIDA S COASTAL WATERFRONT COMMUNITIES: SUCCESSES AND LESSONS LEARNED IN THE WATERFRONTS FLORIDA PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM Jennifer
More informationState Highway 121 Southwest Parkway. Fort Worth s Transportation Success Story in Design and Cooperation
State Highway 121 Southwest Parkway Fort Worth s Transportation Success Story in Design and Cooperation Greater Fort Worth Association of Realtors October 24, 2007 Presented by: Dan Lamers, P.E. North
More informationPORT OF VANCOUVER WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT. Concept Development Plan City Center Redevelopment Authority April 20, 2017
PORT OF VANCOUVER WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT Concept Development Plan City Center Redevelopment Authority April 20, 2017 Port History PORT ESTABLISHED 1912 TERMINAL 1 ACQUIRED 1925 GWM SIGNS LEASE 1935 HARBOR
More informationARISE: The Rock Renaissance Area Redevelopment & Implementation Strategy
2014 Professional Awards 1 ARISE: The Rock Renaissance Area Redevelopment & Implementation Strategy Janesville, WI Completed December 2014 Analysis & Planning Purpose of Project 2 The purpose of the Rock
More informationSouth of Eastern Strategic Direction Status Update
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED South of Eastern Strategic Direction Status Update Date: July 10, 2014 To: From: Planning and Growth Management Committee Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning
More informationGeorge Hotel application STAFF REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 14, 2014
George Hotel application STAFF REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 14, 2014 1 Presentation outline Purpose: to seek Council direction for next steps in the review process Application process to date
More information10.0 Open Space and Public Realm
10.0 Open Space and Public Realm 10.0 Open Space and Public Realm The Public Open Space System is comprised of: outdoor spaces available for public use that are either publicly owned (e.g., parks and
More informationManchester. Vision for Manchester
Manchester Vision for Manchester The Manchester Community Plan is a statement of the community values and aspirations for the future. This is an effort to recognize what originally attracted visitors in
More informationDRAFT. Waterfronts and Open Spaces. 10 The Riverfront Open Space System
CHAPTER 4 Waterfronts and Open Spaces 10 The Riverfront Open Space System 12 Planned, proposed and envisioned riverfront recommendations. Figure 4.3.23 The riverfront will become a major new public amenity
More informationMadison St. Oak Park. Request for Proposals. Village Owned Parcel Madison Street Oak Park, Illinois Reissued May 25, 2018.
Madison St. Oak Park Village Owned Parcel 700-728 Madison Street Oak Park, Illinois Reissued May 25, 2018 Proposal Due, 2018 Date 3:00 pm 700-728 Madison Street including adjacent public alley and street
More informationMonday, October 5, THE LIGHTHOUSE, PIER 61 at CHELSEA PIERS, HUDSON RIVER PARK, NEW YORK CITY SPONSORSHIP DECK
Monday, October 5, 2015 THE LIGHTHOUSE, PIER 61 at CHELSEA PIERS, HUDSON RIVER PARK, NEW YORK CITY SPONSORSHIP DECK ABOUT US Our Mission The Waterfront Alliance works to protect, transform, and revitalize
More information2013 Summer Recap. Rockaway Beach
2013 Summer Recap and Discussion on Rockaway Beach Reconstruction Tonight s Agenda Summer Beach Update Phase 2 Assumptions, Constraints and Regulations Rebuilding the Boardwalk Coastal Protection Rockaway
More informationchapter DESIGN GUIDELINES NEW RIVER MASTER PLAN REPORT
chapter DESIGN GUIDELINES NEW RIVER MASTER PLAN REPORT .76 DESIGN GUIDELINES An Overview design guidelines NEW RIVER MASTER PLAN Design Guidelines can transform the image of a city. Specific, design-based
More informationSUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:
Page 1 of Report PB-23-18 SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building Report Number: PB-23-18 Wards Affected: 2 File Numbers:
More informationWelcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments
Welcome This is an information meeting introducing the applications for proposed redevelopment of the Yorkdale Shopping Centre site at 3401 Dufferin Street and 1 Yorkdale Road over the next 20+ years,
More information