STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL COMPLY

Transcription

1 OCTOBER 8, 2013 PROJECT NAME: UHAUL S HWY MAJOR SITE PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICATION: #11903 Met with staff 10/24/13, DRC on 11/4/13 1. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 37. Provide copy of FDEP's Construction Generic Permit (CGP) for NPDES or (NOI). REMARKS: Demonstrate compliance with FDEP s NPDES by providing a copy of the permit or NOI prior to construction. 2. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Waivers listed on cover sheet, if applicable. REMARKS: Add waiver conditions and date of approval after DRC. 3. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Plans signed by owner & signed and sealed by engineer/surveyor. REMARKS: After approval, plans will be electronically stamped by the county. The applicant will receive an indicating that approved plans are available for download and are located in the eplans project Approved folder. For Development Review submittals, with the exception of Final Plats and Minor Site Plans, applicants are required to print, obtain required signatures, and sign and seal two 24 x 36 sets of the electronically stamped approved plan and deliver them to the Office of County Engineer, Development Review Section, located at 412 SE 25th Avenue Ocala, FL Upon receipt, a development order will be issued. Until such time as that development order is issued, the project does not have final approval and construction, if applicable, shall not commence. For plans requiring As-Builts, As-Builts and associated documentation shall be submitted on paper in accordance with current county requirements. 4. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Application fee. REMARKS: The application fee of $ ($5.00 x total site acreage) is due when this plan is resubmitted (if a resubmittal is necessary) made payable to Marion County BCC. Refer to Resolution 10-R-630 for the current fee schedule. Additionally, please include a separate review fee for $40.00 made payable to the Marion County Health Department. 5. DEPARTMENT: UTIL - MARION COUNTY UTILITIES REVIEW ITEM: Comments - No Response Required. REMARKS: No central water or sewer from MCU 6. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Land Use Consistent with Proposed Use & Developer's Agreement? [FLUE Appendix A-5] STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER ACKNOWLEDGED INFO COMMENT REMARKS: The site's existing Future Land Use Designation is Industrial.

2 2 7. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Access Management - Cross/Parallel Access Required? [TE Goal 1A & LDC Section a(2)(e)] STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER ACKNOWLEDGED INFO COMMENT (REFER TO ITEM #30 FOR WAIVER REQUEST) REMARKS: Staff supports the applicant's request for a parallel access waiver to the north, subject to the storage use business, and any future change/redesign/redevelopment in the use would be subject to parallel access requirements effective at that time. 8. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Access Management - Are Sidewalks Provided? [TE Goal 1A & LDC Section a.(1)(d)] STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER ACKNOWLEDGED INFO COMMENT (REFER TO ITEM #29 FOR WAIVER REQUEST) REMARKS: Staff supports the applicant's request for a sidewalk construction waiver along Hwy DEPARTMENT: MANAGEMENT REVIEW ITEM: 15. Addressing STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER ACKNOWLEDGED INFO COMMENT REMARKS: Any addresses for new buildings will be issued at the permitting stage. 10. DEPARTMENT: ENGSUR - SURVEY REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 2. A signed, sealed and dated boundary and topographic survey of the site meeting Florida Minimum Technical Standards Florida Administrate code (61G17-1) and Florida Statutes Chapter 472, being no more than six months old. STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER ACKNOWLEDGED INFO COMMENT REMARKS: Survey to be signed and sealed upon approval. 11. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 2. Submitted curve numbers reflect the soil conditions in the field. REMARKS: The original approved plans from 1985 have supporting calculations that indicate the 25- year, 24-hour storm event was utilized and that the storage volume required was 270,671 cf, with the DRA providing 284,847 cf. The plans provided today indicate that the DRA storage volume is 204,904 cf. It is acknowledged that the original full build out condition has not occurred; however, modeling calculations are required to demonstrate the generated runoff from the proposed improvements can be supported. Therefore, at this time a full stormwater review cannot be provided and future comments may be generated. (Rate, volume, recovery are unknown) Please provide calculations and call Paul Wildman at for further stormwater discussion. 12. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 3. USGS Quadrangle (Quad) map. REMARKS: Please provide a USGS Quad Map for the area. 13. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 6. Soil Borings are provided a minimum of 10' below the pond bottom and the logs are shown on the construction plans. STATUS OF REVIEW: FURTHER DISCUSSION REQUIRED REMARKS: How will the soil borings be applied to the stormwater analysis? (Borings are not located in the DRA and compaction is proposed under the gravel?

3 3 14. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 7. One boring required for each half acre of pond bottom. STATUS OF REVIEW: STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF WAIVER WITH CONDITION OF 3 MORE BORINGS REMARKS: Pending application of stormwater analysis. 15. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 8. One infiltration rate test for each detention/retention facility. STATUS OF REVIEW: STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF WAIVER WITH CONDITION OF 1 MORE INFILTRATION REMARKS: Pending application of stormwater analysis. 16. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 9. Watershed Basin boundary line. REMARKS: Please delineate the basins and include all contributing areas. 17. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 10. Time of concentration calculations and show the hydraulic length for each basin. REMARKS: Pending calculations. 18. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 12. Open or closed basin with 100 year or 25year design storms. REMARKS: Pending calculations. 19. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 15. Pond recovers volume in 14 days. REMARKS: Pending calculations. 20. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 16. Private retention/detention pond maintenance sign. STATUS OF REVIEW: STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF WAIVER REMARKS: No DRA sign has been identified. Please clarify, provide, or obtain a waiver to this item. Stormwater will support wavier. 21. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 17. Pond detail cross-sections showing DHWL 100yr - 24hr event and the SHGWT. REMARKS: Please provide a DRA cross section that indicates the updated 100 year- 24-hour storm event, the ESHWT, side slopes and stabilization. (DRA may need to be expanded) 22. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 18. Freeboard of six inches for 25 year DHWL. REMARKS: Pending calculations.

4 4 23. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 22. Pipe conveyance calculations 25yr-24hr event with a 25yr-24hr tailwater. REMARKS: Provide conveyance calculations that demonstrate capacity for the 25-year, 24-hour storm event with a 25-year, 24-hour tailwater elevation. 24. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 27. Provide a bedding detail for H.D.P.E. pipe. REMARKS: Please provide a bedding detail for the proposed HDPE. 25. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 28. Innovative design of drainage retention/detention basins waiver reqd d (8). STATUS OF REVIEW: FURTHER DISCUSSION REQUIRED REMARKS: While the plans indicate the intent to utilize 12 #57 gravel as a component of the stormwater system, it is unclear how it will function in totality. Is storage capacity the intent? 26. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 32. Building finished floor elevation is to be 12" above 100 year DHWL (4). REMARKS: Pending calculations. 27. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 35. Provide for construction entrance erosion control. REMARKS: Please provide construction entrance with details or reference. 28. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 39. Springs Protection Elements STATUS OF REVIEW: FURTHER DISCUSSION REQUIRED REMARKS: How will springs protection be addressed? 29. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: a (1) (d) - Sidewalks STATUS OF REVIEW: STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF WAIVER REMARKS: 10/7/2013: Sidewalk required unless waiver is obtained. Traffic would support this waiver. 30. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: a (2) - Design Criteria STATUS OF REVIEW: STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF WAIVER FOR PARALLEL ACCESS TO THE NORTH. ENGINEER WILL PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE SOUTH. REMARKS: 10/7/2013: Parallel access required to the north and to the south unless waiver is obtained. Traffic would support waiver for parallel access to the north as this is fence off, however parallel access should be provided from access at HWY 441 to the parcel to the south. 31. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: c (1) (m) - Traffic Impact Analysis REMARKS: 10/7/2013: Please provide Traffic statement on cover sheet with the am and pm peak traffic as well as the average daily traffic.

5 5 32. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: All sheets 24" x 36" and plan identified as "Major Site Plan". REMARKS: Plan not identified as "Major Site Plan". 33. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: If electronic, appropriate space in upper right hand corner for stamp. REMARKS: Please comply with drawing sheet layout instructions in the Applicant Guide page 13 as follows: When creating each drawing sheet, a blank area shall be reserved for placement of the approval stamp. On all drawing sheets, leave the top right corner completely blank, with exception of the border, for the approval stamp. The approval stamp area shall be portrait oriented, 3 x 5, and located 2-3/4 from right edge of paper and 3/4" from the top edge of paper. 34. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Designated area for owner's signature. AND ADD APPROPRIATE STATEMENT REMARKS: 35. DEPARTMENT: FRMSH - FIRE MARSHAL REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Water system rural or municipal STATUS OF REVIEW: NOT APPLICABLE PER STAFF REMARKS: Need to verify proposed buildings are within 500' of a fire hydrant. Angie Sweeney DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Springs Protection Design Required (If YES - ADD SPZ CHECKLIST) REMARKS: Revise the plan to include the following note: "This site is located in the Silver Springs Primary Springs Protection Zone." 37. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: Concurrency - If Concurrency Deferral Elected, is election noted on Plan? (TE Goal \1A) REMARKS: Revise the plan to include the following note: "This project has not been granted concurrency approval and/or granted and/or reserved any public facility capacities. Future rights to develop the resulting property(ies) are subject to a deferred concurrency determination, and final approval to develop the property has not been obtained. The completion of concurrency review and/or approval has been deferred to later development review stages, such as, but not limited to, Building Permit review." 38. DEPARTMENT: MANAGEMENT REVIEW ITEM: 10. Correct road names supplied REMARKS: Sheet 01 Civil Cover has several incorrect road names. Road name of N Henderson LN needs to be removed this is a railroad and is not named. Along with the HWY 441 symbol, the designation of S Pine Ave needs to be added. Road name of Buffington Rd is incorrect - the correct designation is SE 52nd St. Road name of SE 55th Lane needs to be removed this is just a driveway and is not named. Sheet 03 Survey, 04 Civil Existing, 05 Civil Overall, 06 Civil Grading, 07 Civil Ph 1 Stormwater, 08 Civil Ph 2 Stormwater, 11 Civil Erosion & 12 Civil Tree all need the road name of SE 55th Lane removed this is just a driveway and is not named.

6 6 39. DEPARTMENT: ENGSUR - SURVEY REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 3. At least two collinear corners of the site shall be identified and referenced to the Florida State Plane Coordinate System, with datum statement and adjustment noted. REMARKS: State Plane Coordinates, datum and adjustment to shown. 40. DEPARTMENT: ENGSUR - SURVEY REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 5. The location of all existing structures and site improvements with ties to project boundary. REMARKS: Show ties to building corners from property lines. 41. DEPARTMENT: ENGSUR - SURVEY REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 7. The location and dimensions of proposed structures and site improvements. REMARKS: Show ties to building corners from property lines. 42. DEPARTMENT: ENGSUR - SURVEY REVIEW REVIEW ITEM: 14. The location and elevation of the 100-year floodplain within the project area with elevation stated. REMARKS: Floodplain not shown or noted. 43. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: e (1) - Tree locations and tree calculations REMARKS: Due to the phased construction of this site, updated tree calculations are needed. It appears that substantial tree removal is being proposed and the Tree Preservation Plan does not clearly show which trees are to be removed and which trees are to be preserved. If existing trees outside of the current project area are to be used for tree preservation/replacement calculations for the project area, include the total site in the calculations. 44. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: f (2)(a) - Tree protection barricades REMARKS: Add tree protection detail. Indicate the location of tree protection barricades on the grading plan. 45. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: g (5) - Remove all invasive species from property REMARKS: Add note on plan stating that all invasive plants must be removed from the site. 46. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k - Landscape Plan REMARKS: Provide required Landscape Plan. Additional review comments may be generated upon review of Landscape Plan. 47. DEPARTMENT: LSCAPE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND IRRIGATION REVIEW ITEM: k (1)(i) - Irrigation Plan required; minimum requirements Table 8-11 REMARKS: Provide Irrigation Plan. Additional review comments may be generated upon review of Irrigation Plan.

7 7 48. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: 4. Land use and zoning on project and on adjacent properties shown REMARKS: Please provide the land use and zoning of the subject property as well as the land use and zoning of adjacent properties around the site. 49. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: 5. Zoning requirements: lot width, area, setbacks, coverage (floor area ratios), and parking REMARKS: Please provide the floor area ratio permitted and proposed for the project. Please also include parking requirements for the property. These can be shown on sheet DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: 8. Acreage of tract to the nearest 0.10 REMARKS: Please provide the acreage of the property on the cover sheet. 51. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: 9. Date of original and all revisions REMARKS: Please provide the date of the original plan set on all the plans. 52. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: 10. Setbacks, dimensions for all improvements, and easements (Article 5) REMARKS: Please provide the distances from all structures to the property lines. 53. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: 12. Tree preservation requirements (Article ) REMARKS: Please identify on the Tree Preservation Plan which trees will be removed. This can be shown by "X" ing out the trees on the plan. 54. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEW ITEM: 13. Landscape requirements (landscape plan, buffering, (parking lot landscaping) and dumpster screening. REMARKS: A C-type buffer is required along the north property line from the west side of the drainage retention area east to the railroad right of way. A C-type buffer is also required along the southeast property line from the railroad right of way south to the point where the property line runs west. A C-type buffer shall consist of a 15 foot wide landscape strip with at least 5 shade trees for every 100 lineal feet and a hedge planted in double staggered rows and be maintained so as to form a 60-inch high continuous visual screen within two years of planting.

8 UHAUL SELF-STORAGE PID # /24/2013

9 Site Construction Plans of: U-Haul of Ocala RV Expansion DEVELOPER: 5555 S. PINE AVE., OCALA, FLORIDA ENGINEER: SURVEYOR: GEOTECHNICAL: AMERICAN CIVIL ENGINEERING CO. 207 N. Moss Road, Suite 211 Winter Springs, Florida John Herbert, P.E , fax R.M. BARRINEAU & ASSOCIATES, INC SE 25 Loop, Suite 103 Ocala, Florida R.M. Barrineau, P.L.S , fax GEO-TECH, INC S.E. 3rd Avenue Ocala, Florida David Cappa, P.E , fax SITE Site Construction Plans of: U-Haul of Ocala RV Expansion 5555 S. PINE AVE., OCALA, FLORIDA

10 10/3/12 REV. ASPHALT, WET POND 8/17/12 REV. PER SEM. CO. DRC DATE REVISIONS 2 12

11

12 Scale: 1 inch = 60 feet 0' 30' 60' 120' - - DATE REVISIONS 4 12

13 Scale: 1 inch = 60 feet 0' 30' 60' 120' - - DATE REVISIONS 5 12

14 Scale: 1 inch = 60 feet 0' 30' 60' 120' - - DATE REVISIONS 6 12

15 Scale: 1 inch = 60 feet 0' 30' 60' 120' - - DATE REVISIONS 7 12

16 Scale: 1 inch = 60 feet 0' 30' 60' 120' - - DATE REVISIONS 8 12

17 8/17/12 REV. PER SEM. CO. DRC DATE REVISIONS 9 12

18 10/3/12 REV. ASPHALT, WET POND 8/17/12 REV. PER SEM. CO. DRC DATE REVISIONS 10 12

19 Scale: 1 inch = 60 feet 0' 30' 60' 120' - - DATE REVISIONS 11 12

20 J:\12DIST\833\ Ocala at Hwy 441\ construction documents\ inhouse civil\833031_civil0.dwg, 9/12/2013 2:06:16 PM, DWG To PDF.pc A B C D E U-HAUL OF OCALA 5555 S. PINE AVE. OCALA, FL F PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TREE PRESERVATION PLAN SCALE: 1"=30'