A PERSON DESIGNATED WITH THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE DECISIONS MUST BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING.
|
|
- Gregory Thomas Sanders
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AGENDA BIRMINGHAM HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MUNICIPAL BUILDING-COMMISSION ROOM-151 MARTIN STREET WEDNESDAY September 17, 2014 ***************7:00 PM*************** 1) Roll Call 2) Approval of the HDC Minutes of August 6, ) Sign Review 217 S. Old Woodward Fleur Detroit (Postponed from ) 4) Historic Design Review 220 Merrill Pergola review 5) Historic Design and Sign Review 6) Short Term Projects 7) Miscellaneous Business and Communication A. Staff Reports Administrative Approvals Violation Notices Demolition Applications B. Communications Commissioners Comments 8) Adjournment Notice: Individuals requiring accommodations, such as interpreter services, for effective participation in this meeting should contact the City Clerk's Office at (248) at least on day in advance of the public meeting. Las personas que requieren alojamiento, tales como servicios de interpretación, la participación efectiva en esta reunión deben ponerse en contacto con la Oficina del Secretario Municipal al (248) por lo menos el día antes de la reunión pública. (Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964). A PERSON DESIGNATED WITH THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE DECISIONS MUST BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING.
2 HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 6, 2014 Municipal Building Commission Room 151 Martin, Birmingham, Michigan Minutes of the regular meeting of the Historic District Commission ( HDC ) held Wednesday, August 6, Chairman John Henke called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. Present: Absent: Chairman John Henke; Commission Members Mark Coir, Natalia Dukas, Darlene Gehringer, Vice-Chairperson Shelli Weisberg (arrived at 7:10 p.m.), Michael Willoughby; Student Representatives Mitch Boorstein, Cambrea Rush Commission Member Keith Deyer Administration: Matthew Baka, Sr. Planner Carole Salutes, Recording Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES HDC Minutes of July 16, 2014 Motion by Mr. Coir Seconded by Ms. Gehringer to approve the HDC Minutes of July 16, 2014 as presented. Motion carried, 5-0. VOICE VOTE Yeas: Coir, Gehringer, Dukas, Henke, Willoughby Nays: None Absent: Deyer, Weisberg FINAL HISTORIC DESIGN REVIEW 631 Bates Infill house (postponed from May 7, 2014) Bates St. Historic District Zoning: R-3 Single Family
3 Historic District Commission Minutes of August 6, 2014 Page 2 of 4 Proposal: This application was discussed regarding its feasibility at the February 19, 2014 HDC meeting. The Historic Major Jones House is located on the north half of a large lot at 607 S. Bates. The south half of the lot is vacant. A Lot Split Application for the property was reviewed and approved by the City Commission at their March 10, 2014 meeting. The 631 S. Bates address is tentative, and has not yet been approved by the City. The applicant appeared before the HDC to seek preliminary approval for the design of the new infill house on May 7, 2014 and the application was postponed. The new plans have been revised since that time to reduce the amount of brick on the structure to just the foundation and chimney. The body of the house is now comprised completely of siding. Also, additional supplemental information on the massing of the new house has been provided on a sheet that places the new home in context with other homes on the street. Proposal: The applicant proposes to construct an infill house in the vacant lot next to 607 S. Bates. The proposed house is reminiscent of a traditional farmhouse but it will use contemporary materials. The applicant has detailed the following points regarding the new house: A farmhouse will be an appropriate addition to Bates Street (Historic District). The simplicity of the proposed house with its use of gables and simple shapes, use of a combination of brick (foundation and chimney) and lap siding and modest color scheme will blend with its neighbors. The houses in the Bates Street Historic District vary in size; the proposed house will be in scale with the smaller houses an eave height of 20 ft. and overall height of 25 ft. 4 in. (as measured to the midpoint of the roof just over 30 ft. as measured to the peak of the ridge) and a footprint of 1,142 sq. ft. The house will be street friendly including a front porch. The first floor will have nine foot ceilings; The proposed home is in the style of a farmhouse; similar to homes in the area. The house will include a covered front porch. Exterior: Brick (foundation and chimney) and lap siding; Combination of asphalt and metal roof; The trim will be simple flat stock; The windows will have appropriate muntins; Detached, single story garage (no habitable attic) at the rear of the yard. Mr. Jeff Dawkins, the architect, was present. The chairman complimented him on the great job he has done in meeting the concerns this commission has raised with respect to the scale and materials that will be used on the infill house. Motion by Mr. Willoughby
4 Historic District Commission Minutes of August 6, 2014 Page 3 of 4 Seconded by Ms. Dukas to approve the Final Historic Design Review for 631 Bates as submitted. There were no comments from the public on the motion at 7:10 p.m. Motion carried, 5-0. VOICE VOTE Yeas: Coir, Gehringer, Dukas, Henke, Willoughby Nays: None Absent: Deyer, Weisberg MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Staff Reports -- Administrative Approvals 101 N. Old Woodward Ave., Cosi Restaurant. - Requesting approval to reskin awnings of restaurant with text printed on them. -- Violation Notices (none) -- Demolition Applications 187 Glenhurst 888 Chapin 767 Smith 1165 Fairfax B. Communications -- Commissioners Comments It was noted that so far there have been mixed reviews on the pergola at 220 Merrill St. ADJOURNMENT No further business being evident, the board motioned to adjourn the meeting at 7:12 p.m.
5 Historic District Commission Minutes of August 6, 2014 Page 4 of RECONVENE Chairman John Henke called the meeting to order again at 8:03 p.m. Ms. Barbara Spencer, 563 Bates, received confirmation that the infill house at 631 Bates will be real brick, as opposed to brick veneer. Additionally, with respect to the historic house 607 Bates the porch will be changed back to the original design. ADJOURNMENT No further business being evident, the board motioned to adjourn at 8:04 p.m. Matthew Baka Sr. Planner
6 MEMORANDUM Date: August 28, 2014 To: Historic District Commission Members From: Matthew Baka, Senior Planner RE: Sign Review 217 S. Old Woodward Zoning: B-2 General Business Existing Use: Retail Proposal The applicant proposes to install new name letter sign reading Fleur Detroit on an existing one-story building. Signage The total linear building frontage is 15 5, permitting square feet of sign area. The proposed name letter sign will measure 10 h x 7 w or square feet. In accordance with Article 1.0, section 1.04 (B) of the Birmingham Sign Ordinance, Combined Sign Area - For all buildings, including multi-tenant office or retail buildings, the combined area of all types of signs shall not exceed 1 square foot (1.5 square feet for addresses on Woodward Avenue) for each linear foot of principal building frontage. The proposal meets this requirement. The mounting height of the sign is not indicated on the plans. In accordance with Article 1.0, Table B of the Birmingham Sign Ordinance - Wall signs that project more than 3 inches from the building facade shall not be attached to the outer wall at a height of less than 8 feet above a public sidewalk and at a height of less than 15 feet above public alley. It appears the proposal meets this requirement. However, the applicant must update the plans to verify the mounting height The name letter sign is proposed to be constructed of ¼ steel and mounted 5 off the face of the building. In accordance with Article 1.0, section 1.05 (K) of the Birmingham Sign Ordinance, No wall signs shall project more than 9 inches measured from the wall to which it is attached to the outer surface. The proposal meets this requirement. Illumination The applicant is proposes to use the existing goose neck lamps to illuminate the sign. Sec Design review standards and guidelines. 1. (a) In reviewing plans, the commission shall follow the U.S. secretary of the interior's standards for rehabilitation and guidelines for rehabilitating historic buildings as set forth in 36 C.F.R. part 67. Design review standards and guidelines that address special design characteristics of historic districts administered by the commission may be followed if they are equivalent in guidance to the secretary of interior's standards and guidelines and are established or approved by the state historic preservation office of the Michigan Historical Center. (b) In reviewing plans, the commission shall also consider all of the following: (1) The historic or architectural value and significance of the resource and its - 1 -
7 relationship to the historic value of the surrounding area. (2) The relationship of any architectural features of the resource to the rest of the resource and to the surrounding area. (3) The general compatibility of the design, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. (4) Other factors, such as aesthetic value, that the commission finds relevant. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division recommends that the Commission issue a Certificate of Approval for the historic sign review application for 217 S. Old Woodward. The work meets The Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings, standard number 9, New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic material that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. WORDING FOR MOTIONS I move that the Commission issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for. The work as proposed meets ''The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation" standard number. I move that the Commission issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for, provided the following conditions are met: (List Conditions). ''The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation" standard number. I move that the Commission deny the historic application for. Because of the work does not meet 'The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation" standard number. "THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION AND GUIDELINES FOR REHABILITATING HISTORIC BUILDINGS" The U. S. secretary of the interior standards for rehabilitation are as follows: (1) A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. (2) The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The - 2 -
8 removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. (3) Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. (4) Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. (5) Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved. (6) Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. (7) Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. (8) Significant archaeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken. (9) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (10) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Notice To Proceed I move the Commission issue a Notice to Proceed for application number. The work is not appropriate, however the following condition prevails: and the proposed application will materially correct the condition
9 Choose from one of these conditions: a) The resource constitutes hazard to the safety of the public or the structure's occupants. b) The resource is a deterrent to a major improvement program that will be of substantial benefit to the community and the applicant proposing the work has obtained all necessary planning and zoning approvals, financing, and environmental clearances. c) Retaining the resource will cause undue financial hardship to the owner when a governmental action, an act of God, or other events beyond the owner s control created the hardship, and all feasible alternatives to eliminate the financial hardship, which may include offering the resource for sale at its fair market value or moving the resource to a vacant site within the historic district. have been attempted and exhausted by the owner. d) Retaining the resource is not in the best of the majority of the community. Sec Duties of Design Review Board. The Design Review Board shall review all documents submitted pursuant to this section determining the facts given in this section. (1) All of the materials required by this section have been submitted for review. (2) All provisions of chapter 126 of this Code have been complied with. (3) The appearance, color, texture and materials being used will preserve property values in the immediate neighborhood and will not adversely affect any property values. (4) The appearance of the building exterior will not detract from the general harmony of and is compatible with other buildings already existing in the immediate neighborhood. (5) The appearance of the building exterior will not be garish or otherwise offensive to the sense of sight. (6) The appearance of the building exterior will tend to minimize or prevent discordant and unsightly properties in the city. (7) The total design, including but not limited to colors and materials of all walls, screens, towers, openings, windows, lighting and signs, as well as treatment to be utilized in concealing any exposed mechanical and electrical equipment, is compatible with the intent of the urban design plan or such future modifications of that plan as may be approved by the city commission. (Code 1963, 5.192(4)) - 4 -
10 Article 2, Sign review (b) Restrictions. (1) The Historic District Commission, Design Review Board or Planning Board may impose restrictions on the size, placement and appearance of signs in addition to those requirements set forth by this ordinance. (2) The Historic District Commission, Design Review Board or Planning Board shall not allow the alteration or construction of any sign which would violate the requirements of this ordinance
11 Sign Ordinance Requirements Name Letter/Wall Signs Planning Division Property Address: 217 S. Old Woodward Current Zoning: B-4, Business-Residential Sign Copy: Fleur Detroit Maximum Area Maximum Height Other Sign measurements Illumination Required Proposed Review Woodward 1.5 square feet per linear foot. Other 1 square foot per linear foot 15.4' Total Linear Street Frontage Name Letter Sign Woodward 3 Other 2 Wall Sign Woodward 4 Other 3 Logos/design elements may be greater than 3 in height subject to approval Thickness = 9 maximum Height from grade = 8 sidewalk if over 3 thick Height from grade 15 alley, etc. Non-historic District Steady light only No exposed neon B1 Zone 10:00pm or ½ Hour after close of Business Adj. residential no side or rear lights Historic District As listed above Halo backlighting Exterior light fixtures No internal illumination # Allowed Principal Wall Sign 1 street = 1 sign 2 streets = 2 identical sgn 3 + streets = each frontage Front Sign height: 16" Sign width: 7' Total sign area: sq. ft Front Sign height: 16" Front Logo height: N/A Sign Thickness: 1/4" Sign Height above grade:tbd Existing Goose neck lights One Street = One Sign One rear Sign Meets requirements Meets requirements Meets requirements Meets requirements Meets requirements
12 Reviewed by: Matthew Baka Date: August 28, 2014 All above can not exceed maximum sign area for building Wall / Name Letter Sign Limited by area per frontage
13 MEMORANDUM Date: June 12, 2014 To: From: RE: Historic District Commission Members Sheila Bashiri, City Planner Historic Design Review 220 Merrill Historic Detroit Edison Company CBD Historic District Zoning: B-4, Business-Residential Existing Use: Restaurant Proposal The applicant was granted temporary approval for the pergola in the outdoor dining area on June 18 th, 2014 with the condition that they return to the Board at the September 17 th meeting for final consideration. The following report and meeting minutes detail the proposal and discussion for this project. The applicant proposes to update the outdoor dining area of a two-story single tenant contributing historic building in the CBD Historic District. The building was originally constructed in by the Edison Electric Company at a cost of $100,000. The building was designed in the English Revival style to compliment Birmingham s City Hall and the Baldwin Library. The building was sold in 1978 for use as a restaurant and office. It was recently purchased by a new owner, and it is undergoing an interior renovation. The applicant is proposing to increase the outdoor dining area, add a pergola, and replace a window with a door. This application was reviewed at the May 7, 2014 HDC Meeting, and the changes to the building were approved (See attached minutes). The HDC requested that the applicant return with clarification on the following items: Intended plantings on the pergola; Lighting spec sheets; Tear sheet for the chair; Floor plan for winter and summer placement of the planters; and Pergola detail winter and summer. Additionally, the applicant made some changes to the proposal regarding adding pavers to the front of the building. Outdoor Dining Area The existing outdoor dining area is located directly in front of the building s three storefront windows. The applicant proposes to expand the existing 360 square foot outdoor dining area to both the east and west to extend the full length of the property. The applicant is also proposing to include a new outdoor dining area west of the restaurant s entrance door to the bollards that delineate the Active Via. The existing outdoor dining area will also extend into the public sidewalk to the north. The total outdoor dining area proposed is 825 square feet. The applicant has provided a trash receptacle within the outdoor dining area as required by the Zoning Ordinance
14 The applicant is proposing a total of 70 seats in the expanded outdoor dining area, 64 of which are located at dining tables, and 6 of which are located next to 3 side tables in the lounge area proposed at the east end of the building. The applicant brought a sample of the proposed chair to the meeting and the HDC requested a specification sheet for the chair. The applicant has not yet provided the information, but intends to do so at or before the meeting. Pergola The applicant proposes to install a pergola structure in front of the storefront windows of the original dining area. The proposed pergola will be constructed of 5 square metal tube columns with bolted connections and decorative metal finials. The pergola is proposed for the central portion of the outdoor dining area and it will be 26 4 wide x 8 3 above grade. The pergola will extend over approximately 300 sq. ft. of the outdoor dining area. The pergola structure will have a patina colored finish to match the entry canopy. The proposed pergola will remain in place during the winter season when the outdoor dining area is not in use. The Planning Division is of the opinion that the proposed pergola has the more delicate decorative styling that is associated with French architecture, and is not quite compatible with the strong bold lines associated with the historic English Tudor styling of the building. Landscaping The majority of the proposed outdoor dining area is located on private property. However, some of the planters extend into the public right-of-way in the central portion of the outdoor dining area. The existing concrete planters that surround the current outdoor dining on the site will remain, and new ones will be manufactured to match for a total of 11 planters surrounding the expanded outdoor dining area. For the winter season, the applicant proposes to remove and store the planters. The applicant provided photos of the pergola but it will not have any plantings. Pavers The applicant proposes to add pavers to the dining area. The applicant proposes to install Unilock Select, Umbriano pavers in the color Summer Wheat. The Summer Wheat (creamy white) pavers will be bordered by Unilock Select, Belpasso pavers in the color Nuvola (Medium grey). The proposed pavers will be located on the front and west side of the building. The Planning Division has determined that the proposed two-tone pavers are not appropriate for this historic building. The pattern is busy and adds another color, not found in the building. The proposed pavers will detract from the style and details of the historic building. Illumination The existing pedestrian light fixtures on E. Merrill in the right-of-way will remain. The applicant is proposing to remove the two existing ground mounted light fixtures that flank either side of the existing entrance to the restaurant. No new building lighting is proposed and no lighting is proposed for the pergola. Sec Design review standards and guidelines. 1. (a) In reviewing plans, the commission shall follow the U.S. secretary of the interior's standards for rehabilitation and guidelines for rehabilitating historic buildings as set forth in 36 C.F.R. part 67. Design review standards and guidelines that address special - 2 -
15 design characteristics of historic districts administered by the commission may be followed if they are equivalent in guidance to the secretary of interior's standards and guidelines and are established or approved by the state historic preservation office of the Michigan Historical Center. (b) In reviewing plans, the commission shall also consider all of the following: (1) The historic or architectural value and significance of the resource and its relationship to the historic value of the surrounding area. (2) The relationship of any architectural features of the resource to the rest of the resource and to the surrounding area. (3) The general compatibility of the design, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. (4) Other factors, such as aesthetic value, that the commission finds relevant. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division recommends that the Commission issue a Certificate of Approval for the historic design review application for 220 Merrill, provided the following conditions are met: 1. The chair specifications must be provided; 2. The applicant consider using a pergola that is compatible with the design of the building; 3. The applicant change the pavers to a color that is compatible with the historic building; and If these conditions are met, then the work will meet The Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings, standard number 9, New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. WORDING FOR MOTIONS I move that the Commission issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for. The work as proposed meets ''The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation" standard number. I move that the Commission issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for, provided the following conditions are met: (List Conditions). ''The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation" standard number will be met upon fulfillment of condition(s). I move that the Commission deny the historic application for. Because of the work does not meet 'The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation" standard number
16 "THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION AND GUIDELINES FOR REHABILITATING HISTORIC BUILDINGS" The U. S. secretary of the interior standards for rehabilitation are as follows: (1) A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. (2) The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. (3) Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. (4) Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. (5) Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved. (6) Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. (7) Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. (8) Significant archaeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken. (9) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment
17 (10) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Notice To Proceed I move the Commission issue a Notice to Proceed for number. The work is not appropriate, however the following condition prevails: and the proposed application will materially correct the condition. Choose from one of these conditions: a) The resource constitutes hazard to the safety of the public or the structure's occupants. b) The resource is a deterrent to a major improvement program that will be of substantial benefit to the community and the applicant proposing the work has obtained all necessary planning and zoning approvals, financing, and environmental clearances. c) Retaining the resource will cause undue financial hardship to the owner when a governmental action, an act of God, or other events beyond the owner s control created the hardship, and all feasible alternatives to eliminate the financial hardship, which may include offering the resource for sale at its fair market value or moving the resource to a vacant site within the historic district. have been attempted and exhausted by the owner. d) Retaining the resource is not in the best of the majority of the community
18 HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 18, 2014 Municipal Building Commission Room 151 Martin, Birmingham, Michigan Minutes of the regular meeting of the Historic District Commission ( HDC ) held Wednesday, June 18, Chairman John Henke called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. Present: Absent: Chairman John Henke; Commission Members Mark Coir, Natalia Dukas, Darlene Gehringer, Vice-Chairperson Shelli Weisberg; Student Representative Mitch Boorstein, Keith Deyer, Michael Willoughby; Student Representative Cambrea Rush Administration: Matthew Baka, Sr. Planner Carole Salutes, Recording Secretary Chairman Henke offered petitioners the opportunity to postpone to the next meeting with no additional cost when a full board might be present, as it requires four affirmative votes to pass a motion. However, everyone wished to go forward this evening HISTORIC DESIGN REVIEW 220 E. Merrill Historic Detroit Edison Co. CBD Historic District Motion by Ms. Weisberg Seconded by Mr. Coir to pass for now, as the appellant was not present. Motion carried, 5-0. VOICE VOTE Yeas: Weisberg, Coir, Dukas, Gehringer, Henke Nays: None Absent: Deyer, Willoughby Zoning: B-4 Business-Residential Proposal: The applicant proposes to update the outdoor dining area of a one-story, single-tenant contributing historic building in the CBD Historic District. The building was originally constructed in 1931 and designed in the English Revival style to compliment Birmingham's City Hall and the Baldwin Library. The building was sold in 1978 for use as a restaurant and office. It was recently purchased by a new owner and is undergoing an interior renovation. The applicant proposes to increase the outdoor dining area, add a pergola, and replace a window with a door
19 This application was reviewed at the May 7, 2014 HDC meeting, and the changes to the building were approved. The HDC requested that the applicant return with clarification on several items. Additionally, the applicant made some changes to the proposal regarding adding pavers to the front of the building. Outdoor Dining Area: The applicant proposes to expand the existing 360 sq. ft. outdoor dining area the full length of the property. The applicant is also proposing to include a new outdoor dining area west to the bollards that delineate the Active Via. The existing outdoor dining area will also extend into the public sidewalk to the north. The total outdoor dining area proposed is 825 sq. ft. The applicant is proposing a total of 70 seats in the expanded outdoor dining area. Four flush in-ground mounted patio umbrellas in Sunbrella "Canvas Parrot" are proposed at the eastern and western ends of the expanded outdoor dining area. Pergola: The applicant proposes to install a pergola structure in front of the storefront windows of the original dining area. The pergola will extend over approximately 300 sq. ft. of the outdoor dining area. The proposed pergola will remain in place during the winter season when the outdoor dining area is not in use. The Planning Division is of the opinion that the proposed pergola has the more delicate decorative styling that is associated with French architecture, and is not quite compatible with the strong bold lines associated with the historic English Tudor styling of the building. Landscaping: The majority of the proposed outdoor dining area is located on private property. The existing concrete planters that surround the current outdoor dining on the site will remain, and new ones will be manufactured to match for a total of 11 planters surrounding the expanded outdoor dining area. For the winter season, the applicant proposes to remove and store the planters. Pavers: The applicant proposes to install Unilock Select, Umbriano pavers in the color Summer Wheat. The creamy white pavers will be bordered by Unilock Serlect, Belpasso pavers in the color Nuvola (medium grey). The proposed pavers will be located on the front and west side of the building. The Planning Division has determined that the proposed two-tone pavers are not appropriate for this historic building The pattern is busy and adds another color, not found in the building. Illumination: The existing pedestrian light fixtures on E. Merrill in the right-of-way will remain. The applicant is proposing to remove the two existing ground mounted light fixtures that flank either side of the existing entrance to the restaurant. No new building lighting is proposed and no lighting is proposed for the pergola. Ms. Denise Ilich and Mr. Zaid Elia, the business partners, were present. Chairs Chairman Henke noted they will need a tear sheet for the chairs
20 Mr. Elia said they have ordered the chair cushions in mineral blue but they would like to have the option to leave them off. Pavers Chairman Henke voiced his personal opinion that he would like to see one paver color as opposed to two. Mr. Elia indicated they don't want to use concrete because of the cracking. He explained how the two paver colors that are proposed fit in with their overall concept of the restaurant. The consensus of board members was to approve the pavers as presented. Planters Mr. Coir felt the planters overlap the 5 ft. clear walkway in two sections. Mr. Baka added that ADA compliant tree grates are used as part of the 5 ft. easement. Mr. Christopher Longe, Architect, explained they have maintained 5 ft. in all areas. Additionaly, the planters are movable. Mr. Elia agreed to remove the planters, tables, and chairs and store them for the winter. Pergola Mr. Elia advised the design of the pergola was to accentuate the beauty of the building and to create a charming environment that everyone will appreciate. The hanging baskets and plantings have been removed. Ms. Ilich added that two architects have suggested that a pergola would enhance the front of the building. It is a natural addition and it will add life to the street and attract more people to the community. Mr. Coir had a problem with this particular design for the pergola. Something more germaine would be somewhat more English, similar to what is found at Cranbrook House. Ms. Weisberg appreciated Mr. Coir's view but was fine with the pergola as proposed and likes the thought of ivy growing on it. She gives the applicant the benefit of the doubt that they will maintain it correctly. She would be afraid of a wood pergola. Ms. Dukas also respected Mr. Coir's opinion. Additionally she was worried about maintenance of the plantings. Ms. Gehringer was not sure whether a pergola is even necessary. If it is necessary, this particular design may be too simplistic. Mr. Elia questioned what they can do to make their vision happen. Ms. Ilich proposed they erect the pergola for the summer; and if the commission members don't like it they will take it down. The applicants perferred to include plantings. Motion by Ms. Dukas Seconded by Ms. Weisberg to grant temporary approval for the pergola including plantings with the condition they come back on September 17 for review. There were no comments from the public at 8:50 p.m. Motion failed,
21 VOICE VOTE Yeas: Dukas, Weisberg, Henke Nays: Coir, Gehringer Absent: Deyer, Wiilloughby Mr. Elia thought they deserve the benefit of the doubt. The board has nothing to lose over the next two months. Ms. Ilich indicated they just want to prove the pergola can be beautiful. This is the type of differentiator that could make this community really interesting and draw in more traffic to the area. She pleaded with the commission to just give them a shot. Motion by Ms. Dukas Seconded by Ms. Weisberg to grant temporary approval for the pergola including plantings but no lights with the condition the petitioner reappear before the HDC on September 17 for either approval or denial of the pergola remaining in place or being removed from the site. Motion carried, 4-1. VOICE VOTE Yeas: Dukas, Gehringer, Henke, Weisberg Nays: Coir Absent: Deyer, Willoughby Motion by Ms. Dukas Seconded by Ms. Gehringer to approve the two-tone paving as submitted; to approve the planters with the understanding that the ADA compliance of a 5 ft. walkway will be maintained; that the board requires a correct tear sheet on the chairs; and that the planters will be removed completely from the outdoor area in the winter. There were no comments from the public on that motion at 9 p.m. Motion carried, 5-0. VOICE VOTE Yeas: Dukas, Gehringer, Coir, Henke, Weisberg Nays: None Absent: Deyer, Willoughby HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 7, 2014 Municipal Building Commission Room 151 Martin, Birmingham, Michigan
22 HISTORIC DESIGN REVIEW 220 E. Merrill Historic Detroit Edison Co. CBD Historic District Zoning: B-4 Business-Residential Proposal: The applicant proposes to update the outdoor dining area of a one-story, single-tenant contributing historic building in the CBD Historic District. The building was originally constructed in 1931 and designed in the English Revival style to compliment Birmingham's City Hall and the Baldwin Library. It was sold in 1978 for use as a restaurant and office. and recently purchased by a new owner. The applicant is proposing to increase the outdoor dining area, add a pergola, and replace a window with a door. The applicant is required to obtain a Special Land Use Permit ("SLUP") due to the change in ownership of both the restaurant and the liquor license. The applicant has already obtained a recommendation from the Planning Board, and approval from the City Commission for the Final Site Plan and SLUP. Outdoor Dining Area: The applicant proposes to expand the existing 360 sq. ft. outdoor dining area the full length of the property. The applicant is also proposing to include a new outdoor dining area west to the bollards that delineate the Active Via. The existing outdoor dining area will also extend into the public sidewalk to the north. The total outdoor dining area proposed is 825 sq. ft. The applicant is proposing a total of 70 seats in the expanded outdoor dining area. Four flush in-ground mounted patio umbrellas in Sunbrella "Canvas Parrot" are proposed at the eastern and western ends of the expanded outdoor dining area. Pergola: The applicant proposes to install a pergola structure in front of the storefront windows of the original dining area. Overhead planters and lights are proposed for the central portion of the outdoor dining area. The required 5 ft. pedestrian pathway will be maintained along the entire frontage of the building. Landscaping: The applicant is proposing to add ADA compliant tree grates to two existing street tree wells. The existing concrete planters that surround the current outdoor dining will remain and new ones will be manufactured to match for a total of 11 planters surrounding the expanded outdoor dining area. Hanging planters are also proposed along the top of the proposed pergola. Illumination: The existing pedestrian light fixtures on E. Merrill in the right-of-way will remain. The applicant is proposing to remove the two existing ground mounted light fixtures that flank either side of the existing entrance to the restaurant. The applicant is proposing to mount hanging light fixtures in three rows overhead on the proposed pergola. The proposed lights are Denali floodlights, manufactured by B-K Lighting. Mr. Chris Longe, Architect, explained they are seeking to expand the outdoor dining for this building to the east and to the west. The vestibule doesn't meet ADA requirements so they are proposing to install doors that meet those requirements and that also
23 facilitate people moving in and out of the outdoor cafe area. The pergola frames the center section of the building. The idea of the pergola is a trellis that allows plantings to grow up and over it. Planter baskets will hang on the outside of the pergola. Pots with greenery will define the seating area to the east and west and during the Winter they will be pulled back off of the right-of-way. Mr. Deyer liked everything except he did not think the pergola matches the historic building. Mr. Willoughby received confirmation that all of the chairs will match and the marble tables will be the same, except for size. He thought it is good that the pergola doesn't look historic and it will be a nice feature of the facade. Other board members wished to see more detail on the pergola and the type of plantings that are proposed. Ms. Gehringer wanted a rendering that depicts the pergola in summer and in winter. Ms. Denise Elitch, business partner, showed a sample of their proposed classic white chair. Mr. Zaid Elia, her partner, established that part of their design was developed after feedback from residents. They wanted something intimate and inviting that respects the nature of the historic building. They are working with the community development director on the design for replacement of the concrete. Mr. Deyer suggested that the board take a vote on the whole plan and defer the pergola so that Mr. Longe can come back with some cut sheets. Motion by Mr. Deyer Seconded by Mr. Willoughby that the Commission issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for 220 Merrill. The work meets "The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation" with the exception of the pergola and the terrace area around it. He would like to see the following items brought back for the board's review with the additional detail that was discussed, as follows: Intended plantings on the pergola; Lighting spec sheets; Tear sheet for the chair; Floor plan for winter and summer placement of the planters; and Pergola detail winter and summer. There were no comments or questions from the public at 7:50 p.m. Motion carried, 7-0. VOICE VOTE Yeas: Deyer, Willoughby, Coir, Dukas, Gehringer, Henke, Weisberg Nays: None Absent: None
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
A PERSON DESIGNATED WITH THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE DECISIONS MUST BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING.
AGENDA BIRMINGHAM HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MUNICIPAL BUILDING-COMMISSION ROOM-151 MARTIN STREET WEDNESDAY March 1, 2017 ***************7:00 PM*************** 1) Roll Call 2) Approval of the HDC Minutes
More informationHISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 18, 2015 Municipal Building Commission Room 151 Martin, Birmingham, Michigan
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 18, 2015 Municipal Building Commission Room 151 Martin, Birmingham, Michigan Minutes of the regular meeting of the ( HDC ) held Wednesday, March 18, 2015.
More informationBIRMINGHAM HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 Municipal Building Commission Room 151 Martin, Birmingham, Michigan
BIRMINGHAM HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 Municipal Building Commission Room 151 Martin, Birmingham, Michigan Minutes of the regular meeting of the ( HDC ) held Wednesday, September
More informationHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC2014-00362 259 South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014 Planning Division Department of Community and Economic Development Applicant:
More informationDOWNTOWN FACADE GUIDELINES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DOWNTOWN FACADE GUIDELINES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOWNTOWN FAÇADE DESIGN GUIDELINES The following design guidelines should be used by any owner of a building or an applicant of the Village s
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Project: 2016-COA-356 Meeting: September 8, th Street Oxford Hotel
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 20 West Colfax, Dept. 205 p: (720)-865-2709 f: (720)-865-3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF E-Mail: landmark@denvergov.org This
More informationHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Park Strip Raised Planter Boxes Minor Alteration PLNHLC2014-00603 163 D Street Meeting Date: November 6, 2014 Planning Division Department of Community and Economic
More informationPLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE
PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE Zero Canal Plaza Development 0 Canal Plaza 2016-162 Cow Plaza 1, LLC Submitted to: Portland Planning Board Date: August 4, 2016 Public Hearing Date: August 9, 2016
More information1 N. Prospect Avenue Clarendon Hills, Illinois
1 N. Prospect Avenue Clarendon Hills, Illinois 60514 630.286.5412 DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 7 pm Board Room, Village Hall 1 N. Prospect Avenue, Clarendon Hills,
More informationHendersonville Historic Preservation Commission Main Street Local Historic District Design Guidelines
Hendersonville Historic Preservation Commission Main Street Local Historic District Design Guidelines Adopted May 16, 2007 Revised September 15, 2010 Drafted by the members of the Proposed Main Street
More informationAGENDA MEETING OF THE TOWN OF ALLEGANY PLANNING BOARD. Monday, November 9, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. Allegany Town Hall 52 W. Main Street, Allegany, NY
AGENDA MEETING OF THE TOWN OF ALLEGANY PLANNING BOARD Monday, November 9, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. Allegany Town Hall 52 W. Main Street, Allegany, NY Salute to the Flag Minutes October 5, 2015 Old Business Michael
More informationApproved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, :30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL
Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 2015 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 15-016; Final Planned Unit Development Arden Plaza;
More informationSMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation
SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS ILLUSTRATED WORKING FOR TEST IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW SMALL LOT CODE AMENDMENT & POLICY UPDATE
More informationCITY OF BIRMINGHAM PLANNING BOARD ACTION ITEMS OF WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2017 SPECIAL LAND USE PERMIT ("SLUP") FINAL SITE PLAN REVIEW
CITY OF BIRMINGHAM PLANNING BOARD ACTION ITEMS OF WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2017 Item Page SPECIAL LAND USE PERMIT ("SLUP") FINAL SITE PLAN REVIEW 1. 325 S. Old Woodward Ave. Adachi Bistro (Peabody Mansion)
More informationMINUTES. Date: November 13, 2013 Location: 747 Market Street, Tacoma Municipal Building, Room 248
Members Ken House, Chair Edward Echtle, Vice Chair Katie Chase Jonah Jensen Megan Luce Daniel Rahe James Steel Duke York Ross Buffington, Wedge Neighborhood Ex-Officio Marshall McClintock, North Slope
More informationCITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 2 March 9, 2011 Project: Description: Applicant: DSR11-004 The applicant is requesting approval to replace the existing exterior wood framed
More informationSecretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation
Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation Rehabilitation is defined as the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while
More informationM E M O R A N D U M CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA
M E M O R A N D U M CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA DATE: March 13, 2017 TO: FROM: The Honorable Landmarks Commission Planning Staff SUBJECT: Certificate
More informationThe broad range of permitted and special uses allowed in the district remain, but some descriptions have been clarified.
Memorandum To: Emily Fultz, AICP City Planner, City of Edwardsville From: Michael Blue, FAICP Principal, Teska Associates Date: January 24, 2019 RE: B-1 Zoning District Update A draft, updated B-1 Central
More informationHistoric Preservation Commission Motion No. 0171
Historic Preservation Commission Motion No. 0171 HEARING DATE: AUGUST 15, 2012 Filing Date: July 25, 2012 Case No.: 2012.0361A Project Address: () Landmark: No. 84 San Francisco War Memorial Complex, Civic
More informationCHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses
CHAPTER 3 Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Section Number Title Ordinance Number Date of Ordinance 16-3-1 Applicability 2006-11 2008-04 07-01-08 16-3-2 Uniform Standards for Architectural Design
More informationCommunity Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)
18.28.500 Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU) The Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU) are intended to help implement the land use goals and strategies found in the Golden Vision 2030 values,
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA COEUR D ALENE PUBLIC LIBRARY LOWER LEVEL, COMMUNITY ROOM 702 E. MULLAN THURSDAY JANUARY 25, :00 pm
DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA COEUR D ALENE PUBLIC LIBRARY LOWER LEVEL, COMMUNITY ROOM 702 E. MULLAN THURSDAY JANUARY 25, 2018 12:00 pm 12:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Ives, Ingalls, Lemmon, Messina,
More informationDivision VI Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards
Division VI 18.40.800 Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards 18.40.810 Guidelines The goals of the Comprehensive Plan include a focus on pedestrian safety, amenities and aesthetics
More informationCENTERS AND CORRIDORS
INITIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES for CENTERS AND CORRIDORS City of Spokane Planning Services Third Floor, City Hall 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd. Spokane, WA 99201-3329 (509) 625-6300 www.spokaneplanning.org
More informationChapter 5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District
5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District 5.1 Introduction The Mixed Use Neighborhood character district acts as a transition or bridge between the State Route 89A District s commercial area to the
More information1. Topeka Cemetery, 1601 SE 10 th Ave. 2. Crawford House, SW 17 th St. I. Roll Call. Approval of Minutes July 13, 2017 Minutes II.
THE TOPEKA LANDMARKS COMMISSION MEETING Holliday Office Building 620 SE Madison Ave., Holliday Conference Room, 1 st Floor A G E N D A Thursday, August 10, 2017 5:30 PM I. Roll Call II. III. IV. Approval
More informationVILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use
VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 SITE DESIGN Purpose 1 CHAPTER 2 SITE DESIGN Streetscape
More informationOFFICIAL AGENDA OF THE
OFFICIAL AGENDA OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STARKVILLE, MISSISSIPPI SPECIAL CALL MEETING OF TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 2017 AT STARKVILLE CITY HALL, SECOND FLOOR CONFRENCE ROOM, LOCATED
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
ITEM F1 City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Development Services Department Submitted and Reviewed by Sergio Klotz, Al~ rector~ Prepared by Mathew Evans,
More informationVEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
This perspective sketch communicates the intended character and quality of a proposed streetscape design. Locate benches near a major intersection where people tend to gather. Seating and lighting provide
More informationDowntown. Design Review. City of Bartlesville Bartlesville welcomes and encourages Special Events. Special Events build a sense of
City of Bartlesville 8.2015 Downtown Design Review Bartlesville welcomes and encourages Special Events. Special Events build a sense of community Contents and create an environment that fosters civic pride.
More informationFLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable
More informationD1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:
D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: BEACH MUNICIPAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PROPERTY OWNER: SISTERS II, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Karen Prochilo REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (AG-2 Agriculture
More informationFourth Street Spenger s
L A N D M A R K S P R E S E R V A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N S t a f f R e p o r t FOR COMMISSION ACTION OCTOBER 2, 2014 1901 1919 Fourth Street Spenger s Structural Alteration Permit Application (LMSAP2014-0006)
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report To: From: CC: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: May 21, 2018 Agenda Item: 8-A Grace Page, Senior Planner Stephanie Reich, AIA, LEED
More informationDesign Guidelines: Brownsville Rd Façade Improvement Program
: Brownsville Rd Façade Improvement Program Thank you for your interest in the Brownsville Rd Façade Improvement Program These Design Guidelines were prepared by Design Center Pittsburgh (DCP) for Economic
More informationBuilding & Site Design Standards Application
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Design standards plan review fee Building & Site Design Standards Application Phone: 208-468-5406 Fax: 208-468-5439 411 3rd Street South Nampa, Idaho 83651 5,000
More informationMINUTES OF THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 1, 2016
MINUTES OF THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 1, 2016 Town Council Meeting 09/20/16 Item #1 The Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos conducted a Special Meeting on Thursday, September 1, 2016, at 6:00
More informationMotor City Re-Store Design Guidelines
DESIGN GUIDELINES Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. General 3. Signage 4. Awning and Canopies 5. Colors and Materials 6. Doors and Windows 7. Storefront Security 8. Exterior Lighting 9. Off-street Parking
More informationJoint Design Review Body Report
Joint Design Review Body Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Joint Design Review Body Joint Design Review Body Meeting: October 12, 2017 Agenda Item: 6-A and 6-B Stephanie Reich, AIA. LEED AP, Design & Historic
More information13. New Construction. Context & Character
13. New Construction Context & Character While historic districts convey a sense of time and place which is retained through the preservation of historic buildings and relationships, these areas continue
More informationPlanning Commission Report
Planning Commission Report To: From: Subject: Planning Commission Planning Commission Meeting: September 16, 2015 Amanda Schachter, City Planning Division Manager Agenda Item: 8-C Appeal 15ENT-0080 of
More informationMIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.
N MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C- FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER 04-00 Project No. 496 Issued Revised SCALE: " = 0' N 0 0 0 40 RZ. c GENERAL PROVISIONS: a. SITE LOCATION.
More informationPLAN COMMISSION VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD
APPROVED PLAN COMMISSION VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD The Plan Commission of the Village of Deerfield held a Workshop Meeting at 7:30 P.M. on at the Village Hall, 850 Waukegan Road, Deerfield, Illinois. Present
More informationgeneral corridor design guidelines gen-0.0
general corridor design guidelines gen-0.0 facades gen-1.0 GEN-1.1: TRANSPARENCY GEN-1.1.1: WALL OPENINGS In order to create buildings that are visually interesting for passers-by, blank ground floor
More informationTable of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.
Table of Contents Introduction 1 Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2 Plan Guidelines 3 Future Urban Form 4 The West-End 4 Main Street 6 The East-End 7 Figure 2 9 Public Improvement Recommendations 7 General
More informationCHESAPEAKE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE
CHESAPEAKE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE CONSERVATION PRESERVATION CZO 19-600 Effective October 16, 2008 BUFFER YARD C PARKING LOT REFORESTATION YEAR 1 REFORESTATION YEAR 4 BUFFER YARD F CBPA REFORESTATION Page
More informationSite Plan Review Committee June 5, 2007
CITY OF ANDOVER SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE June 5, 2007 MINUTES The Site Plan Review Committee met for a regular meeting on Tuesday, June 5, 2007 at the Andover Central Park Lodge located at 1607 E. Central,
More informationLandscaping And Site Details
Landscaping And Site Details Adopted by the Barrio Latino Commission on August 20, 1996 Addition to Ybor City Design Guidelines, Street Furniture. The City of Tampa maintains and is responsible for installation
More informationCITY OF TORRANCE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE AND TORRANCE TRACT HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN. City Council Tuesday, December 5, 2017 PAGE & TURNBULL
CITY OF TORRANCE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE AND TORRANCE TRACT HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN City Council Tuesday, December 5, 2017 PAGE & TURNBULL AGENDA PART 1: FRAMEWORK 1. Objectives and Background
More informationProject phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan
SITE PLAN REVIEW PERMIT APPLICATION City of Grand Haven, 11 N. Sixth Street, Grand Haven, MI 49417 Phone: (616) 847-3490 Fax: (616) 844-2051 Website: www.grandhaven.org 1. Project Information Address/location
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF WEST VANCOUVER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES MUNICIPAL HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER THURSDAY, JULY 19, 2018
THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF WEST VANCOUVER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES MUNICIPAL HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER THURSDAY, JULY 19, 2018 Members Present: Voting Members: Shelley Craig (Chair);
More informationCITY OF ESCONDIDO. Planning Commission and Staff Seating AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION. 201 North Broadway City Hall Council Chambers. 7:00 p.m.
CITY OF ESCONDIDO Planning Commission and Staff Seating JEFF WEBER Chairman DON ROMO Commissioner BOB McQUEAD Vice-Chair VACANT Commissioner OWEN TUNNELL Principal Engineer BILL MARTIN Deputy Planning
More informationARB ACTION MEMO. Mr. Missel called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. and established a quorum.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (434) 296-5823 Fax (434) 972-4012 Date: Time: 1:00 PM Meeting Room: Room #241
More informationCITY OF PLACERVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY OF PLACERVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ITEM 4.1 APPLICATION Special Temporary Use Permit (TUP) 17-04 PUBLIC HEARING DATE December 19, 2017 SUMMARY OF REQUEST Applicant seeks approval from
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: February 3, 2014 Agenda Item: 7.9 To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Scott Albright,
More informationR STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist
R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for
More information1 111 Ill ,..., I 1' VILLAGE OP PLAINFIELD REPORT SUMMARY
GIAMBOTTA PIZZA CASE# 1811-072718.COA.FG.SPR 1 111 Ill - -. -.---.--.,..., I 1' 11 1 11111 1 1 1111 VILLAGE OP PLAINFIELD REPORT SUMMARY Michael P. Collins PRE IDD/T Michelle Gibas \'lllace CLERK TRUSTEES
More informationTown Center Design Guidelines
Adopted by City Council on September 18, 2018 Design Theme The Draper Town Center Design Theme is defined as encompassing those architectural design styles that were prevalent in the construction of civic
More information6 November 13, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: CAH HOLDINGS, LLC
6 November 13, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:, LLC PROPERTY OWNER: LC REALTY, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Kevin Kemp REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (Automated Car Wash) ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: 3565 Holland Road
More informationBACKGROUND / DETAILS OF PROPOSAL
8 APPLICANT AND OWNER: MISSION ENTERPRISES, L.L.C STAFF PLANNER: Kristine Gay REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit ( Eating and Drinking Establishment within 100 of Protected District ) ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION:
More informationORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and
ORDINANCE 17-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA, CREATING ARTICLE XIV OF CHAPTER 118 OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN CODE OF ORDINANCES PROVIDING FOR THE EAST PLANT
More informationOTHER OFFICIALS PRESENT: Director Christiansen, Recording Secretary Murphy
FARMINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS City Council Chambers, 23600 Liberty Street Farmington, Michigan May 14, 2018. Chairperson Crutcher called the Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. at City Council Chambers,
More informationI Street, Sacramento, CA
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sacramento 12 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 To: Members of the Planning Commission PUBLIC HEARING March 10, 2011 Subject: El Dorado Savings Sign Variance
More informationStreetscape Patterns. Design Guidelines, Ridgewood Village Center Historic District, Ridgewood, N.J. page 20
North Broad Street has a unique streetscape pattern with broad curving street, tight enclosure on the east side with attached commercial buildings aligned with the sidewalk, and landscaped open space on
More informationCENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
Applicant s Name: Project Address: NEIGHBORHOOD Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable to the project. Check the box if meets guideline. Indicate
More informationCommunity Design Plan
Gardena General Plan 2006 Authority While the is not a required element of a General Plan, it is included because improving the community appearance and image is paramount to the overall quality of life
More informationThe meeting convened at 7:30 p.m. in the City of San Mateo Council Chambers and was called to order by Chair Massey, who led the Pledge of Allegiance.
CITY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING MAY 25, 2010 The meeting convened at 7:30 p.m. in the City of San Mateo Council Chambers and was called to order by Chair Massey, who
More informationThe full agenda including staff reports and supporting materials are available at City Hall.
Date: February 28, 2018 Time: 6:00 p.m. Place: City Council Chambers 350 North Valencia Blvd. Woodlake, CA 93286 In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the California Ralph M. Brown
More informationBUSINESS DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES
Des Plaines, Illinois Prepared for the City of Des Plaines by: The Lakota Group Laurie Marston, AICP March 2005 Section 5: Streetscape Elements Business District Design Guidelines STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS
More informationHarmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending, Project Development Plan/Final Development Plan - FDP #130021
ITEM NO FDP #130021 MEETING DATE July 23, 2013 STAFF Pete Wray ADMINISTRATIVE TYPE I HEARING STAFF REPORT PROJECT: APPLICANT: OWNER: Harmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending,
More informationHistory of the American Preservation Movement Part Two
History of the American Preservation Movement Part Two Prof. David R. Mertz Program Chair Building Preservation/Restoration Department Belmont College St. Clairsville, OH 1906 Antiquities Act Major Legislation
More informationRequest Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair Garage) Staff Planner Kevin Kemp
Request Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair Garage) Staff Planner Kevin Kemp Location 845 Lynnhaven Parkway GPIN 14963473030000 Election District Rose Hall Site Size 0.40 acre portion of a 6.35 acre
More informationAGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION/DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION
Date and Time: April 05, 2017 04:00 PM 1. Roll call. AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION/DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION Location: Members: o Lee Beveridge o Tim Siebert o Thomas Baldischwiler o Garrett Ryan o Sarah
More informationUrban Planning and Land Use
Urban Planning and Land Use 701 North 7 th Street, Room 423 Phone: (913) 573-5750 Kansas City, Kansas 66101 Fax: (913) 573-5796 Email: planninginfo@wycokck.org www.wycokck.org/planning To: From: Kansas
More informationFAÇADE DESIGN GUIDE. A Placemaking Initiative of the City of Richmond Department of Planning & Development Review
FAÇADE DESIGN GUIDE A Placemaking Initiative of the City of Richmond Department of Planning & Development Review December 2013 arts DISTRICT Facade Improvement Target Area N Belvidere W Broad Brook Leigh
More informationDesign Review Commission Report
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Design Review Commission Report Meeting Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 Subject:
More informationELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES
......... ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES LAGUNA RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN... June 2008 ............ DESIGN GUIDELINES Table of Contents Contents Section A: Town Center Overview...1 A.1. Purpose and
More informationVILLAGE OF CHANNAHON COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. Village of Channahon S. Navajo Drive Channahon, IL (815)
VILLAGE OF CHANNAHON COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES Village of Channahon 24555 S. Navajo Drive Channahon, IL 60410 (815) 467-6644 www.channahon.org Adopted March 6, 2006 VILLAGE OF CHANNAHON COMMERCIAL DESIGN
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 23, 2019 DATE: April 12, 2019 SUBJECT: SP #413 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to permit a fixed bar in a private outdoor café space with associated
More information4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines
4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines The Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan addresses the area between College Avenue and Steele Lane. Mendocino Avenue is a busy arterial that runs parallel
More informationChapter 4: Jordan Road Character District
4: Jordan Road Character District 4.1 Introduction The Jordan Road character district encompasses much of the former Jordan orchard and farmstead, which was a significant part of Sedona s history. The
More informationKingfisher Planned Development (PLNSUB ) and Special Exception (PLNPCM ) Planned Development and Special Exception
Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT To: From: Salt Lake City Planning Commission Maryann Pickering, Principal Planner (801) 535-7660 Date: October 22, 2014 Re: Kingfisher Planned
More informationNarcoossee Roadway Corridor
Community Meeting Narcoossee Roadway Corridor April 5, 2012 Meeting Agenda Purpose of Meeting Continuation of Study Update Process (Previous Meetings Oct. & Nov., 2011) Tonight s Objective Review Proposals
More information1755 Le Roy Avenue (Tellefson Hall)
L A N D M A R K S P R E S E R V A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N S t a f f R e p o r t FOR COMMISSION ACTION FEBRUARY 3, 2011 1755 Le Roy Avenue (Tellefson Hall) Structural Alteration Permit Application (LM
More informationMONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No. Date: 3.10.2016 Site Plan 820160040 Nora School Parker Smith, Planning Technician, Area 1,
More informationCITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT. MEMORANDUM To: From:
CITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Date: Planning Board Juliet T.H. Walker, Planning Director Jillian Harris, Planner 1 Staff Recommendations for the August 23, 2018 Planning
More informationDRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES
IHZ Booklet #7 May 6, 2010 DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES CANTERBURY 7 Overview During the recent planning process for the Plan of Conservation and Development community character was identified as an important
More informationCity of New Bedford STAFF REPORT
PATRICK J. SULLIVAN DIRECTOR City of New Bedford Department of Planning, Housing & Community Development 608 Pleasant St, New Bedford, Massachusetts 02740 Telephone: (508) 979.1500 STAFF REPORT NEW BEDFORD
More informationVILLAGE OF SPRING LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING April 28, :00 PM
Page 1 of 6 VILLAGE OF SPRING LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING April 28, 2015 7:00 PM Barber School Community Building 102 West Exchange Street Spring Lake, MI 49456 49456 1. CALL TO ORDER
More informationThe Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.
More informationREQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional)
Rezoning Petition 2016-117 Zoning Committee Recommendation January 4, 2017 REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional) LOCATION
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report
ITEM F2 City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: FROM: Design Review Committee Development Services Department Reviewed and Submitted by: David Contreras, Senior Planner ~ _1)/} Prepared by: Laura
More informationThe Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation
An Introduction to: Before The Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation H. J. Brown Building After, Raleigh Rehabilitation Rehabilitation is defined as: the process of returning a property
More informationStandards Compliance Review 303 Baldwin Avenue, San Mateo, California
303 Baldwin Avenue, San Mateo, California Prepared for City of San Mateo Prepared by 6 April 2018 SAN FRANCISCO Pier 9, The Embarcadero, Suite 107, San Francisco, California 94111 T: 415.421.1680 F: 415.421.0127
More informationHistoric District Commission Staff Report November 4 th & 18 th, 2015
Historic District Commission Staff Report November 4 th & 18 th, 2015 Page 1 of 36 8. 54/58 Ceres Street (Minor HVAC units (roof-mounted)) 9. 67-77 State Street (Minor Revise windows and doors) 10. 143
More informationSUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA
1 SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA Downtown Bozeman should be the location of buildings of greatest height and intensity in the community. The following guidelines apply
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Design Guidelines for Lower Downtown Historic District, Appendix A: Standards and Guidelines for Signs (2014), pg.
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2012 TO: Chair Woollett and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Daniel Ryan,
More information