PHASE III DRAINAGE REPORT
|
|
- Lucas Lucas
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PHASE III DRAINAGE REPORT FOR Eastlake Assisted Living & Memory Care April 20, 2016 June 3, 2016 August 5, 2016 Prepared for: 3301 E 120 th Ave, LLC E. Maplewood Ave., Suite 150 Greenwood Village CO Phone: Contact: Bill Lyons, Jr. Prepared by: 6505 S. Paris Street, Suite B Centennial, Colorado Phone: Fax: Contact: Jason Monforton, P.E. Job No
2 Your Project, Our Pride TM CERTIFICATION J3 ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC. HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES FOR THE EASTLAKE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN PRESENTED IN THIS REPORT. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY OF THORNTON DOES NOT AND SHALL NOT ASSUME LIABILITY FOR THE DRAIANGE FACILITIES DESIGNED AND/OR CERTIFIED BY MY ENGINEER. I UNDERSTAND TJAT THE CITY OF THORNTONGREVIEWS DRAINAGE PLANS BUT CANNOT, ON BEHLAFT OF EASTLAKE ASSISTED LIVING, GUARANTEE THE FINAL DRAINAGE DESIGN REVIEW WILL ABSOLVE 3301 E. 120TH AVENUE llc AND/OR THEIR SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS OF FUTURE LIABILITY FOR IMPROPER DESIGN. I FURTHER UNDERSTAND THAT APPORVAL OF THE PLAT AND/OR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT DOEST NOT IMPLY APPORVAL OF MY ENGINEER S DRAINAGE DESIGN. ATTEST: NOTARY PUBLIC AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT FOR THE FINAL DRAINAGE DESIGN OF EASTLAKE ASSISTED LIVING WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF THORNTON STANDARDS AND SPECFICATIONS FOR THE DEISIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE RESPONSIBLE PARTIES THEROF. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY OF THORNTON DOES NOT AND SHALL NOT ASSUME LIABILITY FOR DRAINAGE FACILTIES DESIGNED BY OTHERS. JASON A. MONFORTON, P.E. J3 ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC, PRINCIPAL Registered Professional Engineer State of Colorado No
3 Your Project, Our Pride TM TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. INTRODUCTION... 1 A. Location... 1 B. Proposed Development... 1 C. Adjacent Areas... 1 II. HISTORIC DRAINAGE... 1 III. DESIGN CRITERIA... 2 A. References... 2 B. Hydrologic Criteria... 2 IV. DRAINAGE PLAN... 2 A. General Concept... 2 B. Specific Drainage Basins Details... 3 C. Detention / Water Quality Ponds... 7 V. CONCLUSION... 7 VI. REFERENCES... 8 VII. CONTRIBUTORS:... 9 APPENDIX SUPPORTING MATERIAL Vicinity Map....A1 Soils Map.... A2-A4 Development Parcel Data...A5 Parcel Data Table...A6 Composite Imperviousness Calculations...A7 Composite C Factor Calculations...A8 Time of Concentration...A9 Rational Method (2, 5 & 100 Year for Basins B2)... A10 A12 UD Sewer Calculations... A13-21 Full Spectrum Detention Voume...A22 Firm Flood Insurance Map...A23
4 I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to provide a guide to the Developer to use for the planning and final design of drainage facilities for the proposed East Lake Assisted Living and Memory Care. The narrative provides a comprehensive description of the project, methodology utilized for analyses and summarizes the final hydrologic and hydraulic design of drainage facilities. The East Lake Assisted Living and Memory Care parcel will also be referred to as the Site for the remainder of this report. A. Location Located in the southeast one-quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 68 West, of the 6th PM, City of Thornton, Adams County, Colorado. The property comprises of approximately 1.68 acres and is bounded on the south by E. 120th Avenue, on the north, west and east by Madison Park Subdivision. East Lake Assisted Living and Memory Care Facility tributary area resides in the Brantner Gulch Basin. A Vicinity Map is included within the Appendix for reference. The site is located within Zone X as shown on FIRM Map number 08001C0312H which is included in the Appendix. B. Proposed Development The proposed development will be a memory care and assisted living facility consisting of two buildings each with 16 beds, comprising 8761 square feet and 8570 square feet, respectively. The total site is approximately 1.68 acres and will drain to the north into 4 storm inlets and 12 inch and 18 inch RCP storm pipes to one of two water quality ponds that are hydraulically connected via an 18 RCP pipe. Roughly 0.10 acres of predominantly landscaped area will drain off-site un-detained along the northern, western and eastern edges of the property and while the southern edge consists of primarily sidewalk and roadway and will drain to 120 th Ave as it does in the existing condition. The portion entry drives that drain are part of the existing 120 th ROW or areas that Drainage from the Site was divided into a number of sub-basins and analyzed utilizing the rational method outlined in the City of Thornton s Standards and Specification. A reasonable estimate of the composite average percent impervious for the Site after development is 55.0 and 40.5% for the basins draining off-site. The percent impervious was determined using Table 6-3 in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (USDCM) Volume 1. On-Site soils consist primarily of Loamy land, as shown on the Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Map for Adams County, Colorado Area located in the Appendix of this report. These sandy soils are consistent with the characteristics of Hydrologic Soil Group C. Type C soils are identified as having high infiltration rate when thoroughly wetted, moderate runoff, and moderate to severe erosion hazard. Hydrologic analysis for the Site was based on HSG C soils. C. Adjacent Areas The site lies in a residential area bounded on the south by 120 th Ave and an all other sides by the Madison Park Apartments Complex. A Vicinity Map is included within the Appendix of this report. II. HISTORIC DRAINAGE The site is within the major drainage basins of Brantner Gulch. Surrounding land use consists of a combination or urban uses such as commercial and residential. The East Lake Assisted Living parcel is zoned neighborhood services and lies just south of the Madison Park Subdivision Amendment 1, Lot 1, 1
5 Block 1 and north of E. 120 th Avenue. Madison Park receives runoff from a large developed drainage basin south of 120 th Avenue. Runoff from the basin is collected via curb and gutters and storm sewer that are ultimately routed to the south side of 120 th Avenue to a low point and then into an existing 3 x 6 concrete box culvert that crosses 120 th Av to the north and continues north on the Madison Park Subdivision site. The Site currently consists mostly of grassed undeveloped land that currently has one two story framed house and separate garage on the parcel. The site currently drains via sheet flow to the northeast corner of the parcel and onto the Madison Subdivision parcel. III. DESIGN CRITERIA The City of Thornton s Standards and Specification and USDCM provided the basis for all final design recommendations. A drainage plan is presented for the water quality storm events based on City of Thornton s requirements. A. References The City of Thornton s Standards and Specification and the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD), Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manuals (USDCM) (References 1 and 2, respectively) were the major technical references used for this report. B. Hydrologic Criteria Hydrologic analyses were calculated using the Rational Method. Rainfall intensities were taken from The City of Thornton s Standards and Specification (Reference 1) IDF equation and are based upon the 1-hour point rainfall depths as identified in Table 2. Please refer to the Appendix for the maps illustrating the 1- hr point rainfall depths and the rational calculations sheet for the Intensity calculations. Table 2: 1-hr Point Rainfall Depths Storm Event 1-hr Rainfall Depth (in) 2-yr yr yr 2.69 The proposed sub-basin characteristics were developed and used for the computation of peak flow rates and for the hydraulic design. The time of concentration and peak flow rate calculations for each subbasin are presented in the appendix. The design frequencies analyzed were the 5-year (minor) and the 100-year (major) storm events. The Rational Method procedures and methodology follow the City of Thornton s and Urban Drainage s Criteria outlined in References 1 and 2, respectively. IV. DRAINAGE PLAN A. General Concept The site is designed as one basin that will drain to two hydraulically connected ponds. Pond 1 is the primary pond and is located along the eastern edge of the site. Pond 2 is located in the southern part of 2
6 the site and will drain to Pond 1. There is approximately 0.08 acres along the northern perimeter of the site that will not be able to be graded to capture runoff into the onsite water quality ponds. These minimized areas will sheet flow to adjacent properties undetained. The onsite basins were divided into sub-basins. The sub-basins were designated with a letter B to show each corresponds to the same major basin. Basins were subdivided to route runoff and determine peak flows at critical locations. These sub-basins are identified with consecutive numeric characters added to the basin letter identifiers (i.e. East On-Site Basin is sub-divided in to basins B1, B2, etc.) Sub-basins with the alphanumeric identifier OS1 represent the tributary area that drains off-site. Design Points are consistent with sub-basin designations and refer to points where basin runoff is quantified (i.e. DP1). Storm pipes have been sized using the design points to ensure that they are capable of conveying the necessary flows. B. Specific Drainage Basins Details Sub-basin B1 is located on the northwest corner of the site. Runoff from sub-basin B1 is generated from 0.03 acres of sidewalk, 0.01 acres from the roof and 0.07 acres of landscaped area. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin B1 are 0.45 for a 5-year storm and 0.67 for a 100-year storm. The composite basin imperviousness is 35.1%. The runoffs generated from sub-basin B1 are 0.24 cfs for the 5-year storm event and 0.69 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from this sub-basin is conveyed as overland flow to the north until it enters the inlet in the northwest corner of the site (DP1). It then flows to the east via a 12 HDPE Pipe to the water quality pond. The proposed graded depression at the inlet is approximately 4 minimum, this will ensure the 100 year water surface elevation is well below the proposed finished floor of the adjacent building. Based on the proposed manufacturer s specifications the grate at this inlet can capture 100% of the anticipated 100 year flows from this area. Sub-basin B2 contains the northwestern portion of the memory care facility building including courtyard. The area is approximately 0.05 acres of rooftop, 0.01 acres of landscaped area, and 0.01 acres of sidewalk. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin B2 are 0.79 for a 5-year storm and 0.87 for a 100-year storm. The composite basin imperviousness is 80.3%. The runoffs generated from sub-basin B2 are 0.26 cfs for the 5-year storm event and 0.56 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from the roof will be conveyed through downspouts that will be conveyed to the inlet in the courtyard and to the north via a 6 PVC pipe to connect to the 15 PVC pipe at DP2 in the back of the lot. Sub-basin B3 is located in the northern portion of the site and includes the northeast corner of the memory care facility and a portion of the landscape area along the north lot line. Runoff from sub-basin B3 is generated from 0.02 acres of sidewalks, 0.05 acres of the roof, and 0.05 acres of landscaped area. The composite basin imperviousness is 50.9%. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin B3 are 0.29 for a 5- year storm and 0.68 for a 100-year storm. The runoffs generated from sub-basin B3 are 0.33cfs for a 5- year storm event and.74 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from B3 is conveyed as overland flow until it enters the side walk chase in the northeast corner of the basin which leads to the inlet at DP3 in the northern portion of the sub-basin and flows to the east in an 18 PVC Pipe to the EURV Pond. 3
7 Sub-basin B4 is comprised of the majority of the open space between the two proposed buildings and captures the runoff from the down spouts along the west side of the Assisted Living Building. Runoff from sub-basin B4 is generated from 0.03 acres from the roof, 0.02 acres of sidewalks, and 0.10 acres of landscaped area. The composite basin imperviousness is 34.4%. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin B4 are 0.45 for a 5-year storm and 0.66 for a 100-year storm. The runoffs generated from sub-basin B4 are 0.30 cfs for a 5-year storm event and.85 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from B4 is conveyed as overland flow until it enters sidewalk chase and continues on to DP3 in the northern portion of the subbasin and flows to the east in a 18 HDPE Pipe to the EURV Pond. Sub-basin B5 is located on the northwestern edge of the assisted living building. Runoff from sub-basin B5 is generated from the rear portion of this proposed building s rooftop as well as the surrounding landscaped areas and sidewalks. The area is approximately 0.01 acres of roof, 0.02 from the sidewalks, and 0.04 from the landscaped areas. Runoff from the roof will be conveyed through sidewalk chases join the rest of the flow over land to the inlet at DP3. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin B5 are 0.48 for a 5-year storm and 0.68 for a 100-year storm. The composite basin imperviousness is 38.3%. The runoffs generated from sub-basin B5 are 0.15 cfs for the 5-year storm event and 0.42 cfs for a 100-year storm event. During the 100 year storm there is approximately 4 of ponding at the inlet due to the HGL of the pipe network. The surrounding grading has more than enough space to accommodate this ponding Sub-basin B6 contains the portion of the assisted living facility build surrounding the courtyard and the portions of the roof that contribute to the downspouts that discharge in to the courtyard. The area is approximately 0.05 acres of rooftop, 0.01 acres of landscaped area, and 0.01 acres of sidewalk. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin B6 are 0.79 for a 5-year storm and 0.87 for a 100-year storm. The composite basin imperviousness is 80.3%. The runoffs generated from sub-basin B6 are 0.23 cfs for the 5-year storm event and 0.50 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from the roof will be conveyed through downspouts that will be conveyed to the inlet in the courtyard and to the north via a 6 PVC pipe to connect to the 18 PVC pipe in the rear of the lot. Sub-basin B7 is located in the northeast corner of the site. Runoff from sub-basin B7 is generated from 0.02 acres of sidewalks, <0.01 acres of roof, and 0.03 acres of landscaped area. The composite basin imperviousness is 40.8%. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin B7 are 0.50 for a 2-year storm and 0.69 for a 100-year storm. The runoffs generated from sub-basin B7 are 0.11 cfs for a 5-year storm event and 0.29 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from B7 is conveyed as overland flow until it enters an inlet in the northeastern portion of the sub-basin, DP4, and flows to the south in a 24 private PVC Pipe. Sub-basin B8 is located in the southeastern portion of the site along eastern property line. Runoff from sub-basin B8 is 0.01 acres of rooftop and 0.05 acres of landscaped area. The calculated runoff coefficients for sub-basin B8 are 0.35 for a 5-year storm and 0.60 for a 100-year storm. The composite basin imperviousness is 20.8%. The runoffs generated from the sub-basin are 0.10 cfs for a 5-year storm event and 0.32 cfs for a 10-year storm event. Runoff from this sub-basin is conveyed as overland flow to the center of the sub-basin and into Pond 1. Sub-basin B9 is located in the southeastern portion of the site along the entrance road and parking area. Sub-basin B9 contains Water Quality Pond 1. Runoff from sub-basin B9 is generated from 0.01 acres of sidewalk, 0.02 acres of rooftop, 0.02 acres of the pond, and 0.07 acres of landscaped area. The calculated runoff coefficients for sub-basin B9 are 0.48 for a 5-year storm and 0.69 for a 100-year storm. The composite basin imperviousness is 19.1%. The runoffs generated from sub-basin B9 are 0.26 cfs for 4
8 a 5-year storm event and 0.72 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from this sub-basin is conveyed as overland flow to the center of the sub-basin and into Pond 1. Sub-basin B10 is located in the southeastern portion of the site along the entrance road and parking area. Runoff from sub-basin B10 is generated from 0.19 acres of parking, 0.03 acres of sidewalk, and 0.01 acres of rooftop. The calculated runoff coefficients for sub-basin B10 are 0.92 for a 5-year storm and 0.94 for a 100-year storm. The composite basin imperviousness is 96.8%. The runoffs generated from sub-basin B10 are 0.49 cfs for a 5-year storm event and 0.99 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from this sub-basin is conveyed as overland flow to a 12 curb chase in the parking lot DP9, where it will be conveyed to Pond 2. There was not enough space available to grade the entire pond into this location so an 18 concrete pipe has been proposed under the parking area to hydraulically connect Pond 2 to the area where Pond 1 has been graded. This pipe will allow the captured runoff in each pond to raise and lower together to effectively deliver one water quality/eurv pond. This Pond discharges into an outlet structure in Pond 1s. No hydraulic sizing of the pipe has been provided as it is not intended to convey a set rate of flow, it is merely intended to link the two ponds together. Sub-basin B11 is located in the southwestern portion of the site along the entrance road and parking area. Runoff from sub-basin B11 is generated from 0.10 acres of parking, 0.05 acres of landscaped area, and 0.03 acres of sidewalk. The calculated runoff coefficients for sub-basin B11 are 0.72 for a 5-year storm and 0.82 for a 100-year storm. The composite basin imperviousness is 70.4%. The runoffs generated from sub-basin B11 are 0.60 cfs for a 5-year storm event and 1.33 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from this sub-basin is conveyed as overland flow to a 12 curb chase in the parking lot DP8, where it will be conveyed to Pond 1. Sub-basin B12 is located in the western portion of the site. Runoff from sub-basin B12 is generated from 0.01 acres of rooftop and 0.08 acres of landscaped area. The composite basin imperviousness is 70.4%. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin B12 are 0.33 for a 5-year storm and 0.60 for a 100-year storm. The runoffs generated from sub-basin B12 are 0.66 cfs for a 5-year storm event and 2.01 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from B12 is conveyed as overland flow to an inlet at DP7 which will then run east along the front of the memory care building and continue into Pond 1. Sub-basin B13 is located in the southern portion of the site and contains Pond 1. Runoff from sub-basin B13 is generated from 0.10 acres of pond, and 0.24 acres of landscaped area. The composite basin imperviousness is 2.9%. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin B13 are 0.42 for a 5-year storm and 0.65 for a 100-year storm. The runoffs generated from sub-basin B13s are 0.64 cfs for a 5-year storm event and 1.94 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from B13 is conveyed as overland flow to Pond 1. Pond 1 discharges to an 18 concrete pipe that connects to Pond 2. Flows from Pond 2 leave the site via an 18 storm pipe and an outlet structure to control the EURV flows and convey undetained 100 year flows. Runoff flows to the existing 3 by 6 RCB storm sewer to the east of the site at a tie-in point near E. 120 th Avenue. Sub-basin B14 is the front portion of the roof of the memory care facility. Runoff from sub-basin B14 is generated from 0.06 acres of rooftop. The composite basin imperviousness is 90.0%. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin B14 are 0.87 for a 5-year storm and 0.91 for a 100-year storm. The runoff generated from sub-basin B14 are 0.23 cfs for a 5-year storm event and 0.46 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from B14 is conveyed through downspouts directly into the 12 collection pipe and continues in the pipe to Pond 1. 5
9 Sub-basin B15 is the front portion of the roof of the assisted living facility. Runoff from sub-basin B15 is generated from 0.05 acres of rooftop. The composite basin imperviousness is 90.0%. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin B15 are 0.87 for a 5-year storm and 0.91 for a 100-year storm. The runoff generated from sub-basin B15 are 0.19 cfs for a 5-year storm event and 0.39 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from B15 is conveyed through downspouts directly into the 6 collection pipe and continues in the pipe to Pond 2. Sub-basin OS1 is the western portion of the drive that located in the right of way that will be directed to the water quality pond. Runoff from sub-basin OS1 is generated from 0.04 acres of roadway. The composite basin imperviousness is 100.0%. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin OS1 are 0.94 for a 5- year storm and 0.96 for a 100-year storm. The runoff generated from sub-basin OS1 are 0.16 cfs for a 5- year storm event and 0.31 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from OS1 is conveyed through curb and gutter to the curb chase at DP8 and into Pond 1. Sub-basin OS2 is the eastern portion of the drive that located in the right of way that will be directed to the water quality pond. Runoff from sub-basin OS2 is generated from 0.02 acres of roadway. The composite basin imperviousness is 100.0%. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin OS2 are 0.94 for a 5- year storm and 0.96 for a 100-year storm. The runoff generated from sub-basin OS2 are 0.07 cfs for a 5- year storm event and 0.15 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from OS2 is conveyed through curb and gutter to the curb chase at DP9 and into Pond 1. Sub-basin OS3 is the northern edge of the property along the lot line. Runoff from sub-basin OS3 is generated from 0.05 acres of landscaped area. The composite basin imperviousness is 2.0%. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin OS3 are 0.21 for a 5-year storm and 0.52 for a 100-year storm. The runoff generated from sub-basin OS3 are 0.04 cfs for a 5-year storm event and 0.20 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from OS3 is conveyed by over land flow off site and into the existing storm system in the Madison Park Subdivision. Sub-basin OS4 is the eastern edge of the property along the lot line. Runoff from sub-basin OS4 is generated from 0.04 acres of landscaped area. The composite basin imperviousness is 2.0%. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin OS4 are 0.21 for a 5-year storm and 0.52 for a 100-year storm. The runoff generated from sub-basin OS4 are 0.03 cfs for a 5-year storm event and 0.14 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from OS4 is conveyed by over land flow off site and into the existing storm system a in the Madison Park Subdivision. Sub-basin OS5 is the western edge of the property along the lot line. Runoff from sub-basin OS5 is generated from 0.01 acres of landscaped area. The composite basin imperviousness is 2.0%. The runoff coefficients for sub-basin OS5 are 0.21 for a 5-year storm and 0.52 for a 100-year storm. The runoff generated from sub-basin OS5 are 0.03 cfs for a 5-year storm event and 0.14 cfs for a 100-year storm event. Runoff from OS5 is conveyed by over land flow off site and into the existing storm system a in the Madison Park Subdivision 6
10 C. Water Quality Ponds Pond 2 is along the southern edge of the site in the center of the semicircular entry drive. Pond 1 is located in the southeastern corner of the site. The ponds will be hydraulically connected via an 18 concrete pipe. The total required water quality volume for this site is ac-ft. The ponds have been sized to capture and treat the amount of runoff generated by the 1.68 acres of developed site. It should be noted that a portion approximately.4 acres of existing ROW (landscaped area) drains to the ponds but this is not accounted for in the treatment volume. Approximately 60% of the volume will be provided in Pond 1 at ac-ft and 40% in Pond 2ss with ac-ft. Both ponds will have a water quality surface elevation of ft NGVD. The required volume for the on-site water quality pond is based upon the calculation spreadsheet Detention Basin Volume Estimating Workbook by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. Calculations can be found in the Appendix. The outfall from Pond 1s will discharge to the existing 3 ft by 6 ft reinforced box culvert (RBC) via a Type C outlet structure and 18 rcp. The outlet structure will restrict flows in the EURV events and will discharge 100 year flows through the top grate at developed rates. These flow will be conveyed to the 3 x6 RBC that carries public flow and is designed for the 100 year developed stormwater flows from the major drainage basin including this parcel. An analysis of the system from the 3 x 6 RBC installed beginning in the 120 th right of way to the regional detention facility determined that the HGL at the proposed Eastlake Pond 1 would be Even though the Madison Park Drainage Report determined the 3 x 6 RBC is surcharged the HGL would be below the water surface at the proposed Pond 1 and there will be no back flow. In event of an emergency the 100 year flow will spill over the East retaining wall (elevation of Pond 1. The spillway will convey two times the 100 year storm (21 cfs) with a pond depth of
11 IV. CONCLUSION The Phase III (final) drainage plan provided in this report is intended to fully comply with the City of Thornton Storm Drainage Design and Technical Criteria Manual (Reference 1) and the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manuals (Reference 2.) The drainage plan provides the required water quality volume for the proposed development on this Site, has considered impacts on downstream neighbors and infrastructure. The planned improvements outlined in this phase III report will minimize any adverse effects on the water quality of the associated basin. VI. REFERENCES 1. City of Thornton s Standards and Specification, City of Thornton; Revised, October Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manuals, Volumes 1, 2, and 3, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District; June 2001; Revised January Web Soil Survey of Adams County, Colorado, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), April Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Map Community-Panel Number H, National Flood Insurance Program, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Panel 312 of 1150, Effective Date March 5, Phase III Drainage Report Madison Park, Phase One, DHM Design Corporation, December Phase III Drainage Report, Madison Park, EMK Consultants, Inc., September
12 VII. CONTRIBUTORS: Contribution Name, Title Initials Report Prepared By: David Hoesly, P.E. Staff Engineer II Report Reviewed By: Donna Barrentine, P.E. Project Manager Note: Contributors to initial each prepared report prior to FINAL submittal. 9
13 APPENDIX Supporting Material 10
October 7, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report
October 7, 2016 City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7295 RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report As per your request, we are submitting to you the drainage report and
More informationMASTER DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE PLAN FOR MONUMENT HEIGHTS
MASTER DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE PLAN FOR MONUMENT HEIGHTS DRAINAGE REPORT STATEMENT ENGINEER'S STATEMENT: The attached drainage plan and report were prepared under my direction and supervision and are correct
More informationPRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT LATHAM 200 MMSCFD GAS PROCESSING PLANT
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT LATHAM 200 MMSCFD GAS PROCESSING PLANT LOTS B, RECORDED EXEMPTION 1211-2-1, RECX13-0096 LOCATED IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 66 WEST, 6 TH PRINCIPAL
More informationSTORMWATER REPORT FOR WALMART SUPERCENTER STORE # SIOUX FALLS, LINCOLN COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA BFA PROJECT NO
STORMWATER REPORT FOR WALMART SUPERCENTER STORE # 2443-00 SIOUX FALLS, LINCOLN COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA BFA PROJECT NO. 3286 March 1, 2012 I hereby certify that this engineering document was prepared by me
More informationCHECKLIST FOR PHASE II DRAINAGE REPORT
I. COVER SHEET CHECKLIST FOR PHASE II DRAINAGE REPORT A. Name of Project B. Address C. Owner D. Developer E. Engineer F. Submittal date and revision dates as applicable II. GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
More informationHEALTH SCIENCES BUILDING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
INTRODUCTION In recent years, the University of Cincinnati (University) has demonstrated a commitment to identifying and implementing sustainable goals and objectives throughout University s Uptown Campuses.
More informationWhen planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.
2.0 Principles When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible. 2.0.1 Drainage is a regional phenomenon that does not respect the boundaries between
More informationPCE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR WESTWOOD MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT 772 NORTH FOREST ROAD TOWN OF AMHERST, ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK
PCE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR WESTWOOD MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT 772 NORTH FOREST ROAD TOWN OF AMHERST, ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK MAY 19, 2014 Prepared By: Timothy M. Lavocat, P.E., CFM
More information6.1. INTRODUCTION 6.2. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Chapter 6: Stormwater Management 6.1. INTRODUCTION This Chapter describes the current drainage patterns on the Project Site, the stormwater management system that is proposed as part of the Proposed Project,
More informationBRISBANE BAYLANDS INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FEBRUARY 2011 APPENDIX O DRAFT
BRISBANE BAYLANDS INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FEBRUARY 2011 APPENDIX O DRAFT PRELIMINARY STORM DRAIN CALCULATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH BRISBANE BAYLANDS REDEVELOPMENT BRISBANE, CALIFORNIA Prepared by BKF Engineers
More informationFigure 1 Cypress Street Study Area Location Map
July 20, 2016 TO: FROM: Jim Massarelli Director of Engineering Jeff Julkowski, PE Michael Burke, PE SUBJECT: Cypress Street Study Area Stormwater Analysis (CBBEL Project No. 16-0058) At the request of
More informationSTAFFORD TRACT NORTH OF US90A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVE This report, prepared for submittal to TxDOT, analyzes existing and proposed detention facilities draining into the TxDOT US90A storm sewer system. The results of the detailed
More informationDRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS For the Carroll Single Family Residence At Santa Clara County Saratoga, California APN: 517-26-010 December 18, 2015 Prepared For: John and Peggy Carroll Prepared By: RI Engineering,
More informationA. Regional Detention Requirements
I. GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Full-spectrum detention is provided for all new development, redevelopment or expansion of a site to provide for water quality and flood control detention. B. Detention
More informationTable of Contents G.1.a Water Resources - Surface Water - Drainage
Table of Contents G.1.a Water Resources - Surface Water - Drainage 1. INTRODUCTION... 1335 2. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING... 1335 a. Regional Hydrology... 1335 b. Local Hydrology... 1337 c. On-site Hydrology...
More informationCity of Waco Stormwater Management Regulations
1.0 Applicability: City of Waco Stormwater Management Regulations These regulations apply to all development within the limits of the City of Waco as well as to any subdivisions within the extra territorial
More informationLeduc Industrial Outline Plan SE W4
Leduc Industrial Outline Plan SE 1-50-25-W4 Within the North Leduc Industrial ASP Prepared for: Leduc Energy Park Ltd. Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. File No. 1161 104655 V5 Table of Contents 1.0
More informationOverall Drainage Report
Overall Drainage Report Date: May 3, 2016 Project: Attn: Gateway at Prospect Overall Development Plan Fort Collins, Colorado Mr. Shane Boyle Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, Colorado
More informationChecklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:
Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number: Email: Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Concept Plan Requirements: I. General Project Information 1. Address or parcel number
More informationFloodplain Technical Memorandum
Southeast Extension Project Lincoln Station to RidgeGate Parkway Prepared for: Federal Transit Administration Prepared by: Denver Regional Transportation District May 2014 Table of Contents Page No. Chapter
More informationC. WATER. 1. Surface Water Runoff. See Section C.3, Flood Hazard/Mudflow Hazard, page Ground Water
C. WATER 1. Surface Water Runoff See Section C.3, Flood Hazard/Mudflow Hazard, page 67. 2. Ground Water Determined not significant by the October 1984 and January 1999 Initial Studies conducted by the
More informationC ity of Grande Prairie Development Services Department
C ity of Grande Prairie Development Services Department FAIRWAY DEVELOPMENT OUTLINE PLAN OP 08 09 Approved April 6, 2009 Prepared by: Focus Corporation Table of Contents 1.0. Introduction 2 3 1.1. Plan
More informationSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE Codes analyses for each subcommittee were completed to assist participants of the Richland County Site Planning Roundtable.
More informationOld Mill Community Association Bioretention Facility
Project Overview This project will install a bioretention facility in a community recreation area owned by the Old Mill Community Association, Inc. Drainage from the area is currently unmanaged and has
More informationAPPENDIX APPENDIX 6 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
APPENDIX APPENDIX 6 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT ECHO BAY NEW ROCHELLE, NEW YORK STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Prepared for: Forest City Residential Group 1 Metro Tech Center North Brooklyn, NY 11201 Prepared
More informationCity of Elmhurst. Comprehensive Flood Plan. City of Elmhurst. City Council Meeting September 15, 2014
City of Elmhurst City of Elmhurst Comprehensive Flood Plan City Council Meeting September 15, 2014 City of Elmhurst Presentation Overview Study Background Study Methodology Analysis of Three Additional
More informationPollutant Removal Benefits
Bioswales Bioswales Similar to biocells, but have a slight, but positive grade toward an outlet Designed to convey the WQv event at very low velocities Promote filtration through native vegetation, infiltration
More information6.1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Chapter 6: Stormwater Management 6.1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been prepared for the Proposed Project in accordance with the requirements
More informationSEMSWA s Role in the Land Development Process
SEMSWA s Role in the Land Development Process One of SEMSWA s responsibilities is to ensure that any new development or redevelopment within its service area is designed and constructed in compliance with
More informationAPPENDIX B. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis
APPENDIX B Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS PETERSBURG ROAD IMPROVEMENTS DOT&PF Project No. 67879 Prepared for: State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public
More informationDrexel, Barrell & Co.
Drexel, Barrell & Co. June 18, 2018 Engineers/Surveyors Boulder Colorado Springs Greeley 3 South 7 th Street Colorado Springs, Colorado 80905-1501 719 260-0887 719 260-8352 Fax El Paso County Planning
More informationTucson Koi & Water Gardens
OV113-031 Tucson Koi & Water Gardens CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SITE ANALYSIS 05.22.2014 Property Owners Walter & Jane Wong Family Investments, LLP 5437 East 3rd Street Tucson, Arizona 85711 Tucson Koi and
More informationHuntington Stormwater Utility
Huntington Stormwater Utility Stormwater Management & Sediment and Erosion Control Requirements for Construction Sites Authorized by Huntington City Code Articles: 971, 970, 930, 935, 955, Revised April
More information5. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL MENORAH MEDICAL CENTER OFFICE BUILDING Vicinity of the southwest corner of 119 th Street and Nall Avenue
5. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL MENORAH MEDICAL CENTER Avenue 1. APPLICANT: Hoefer Wysocki Architects, L.L.C., is the applicant for this request. 2. REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting final
More informationNAPA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Standards & Specifications
Roadway Design & Construction Manual (Table of Contents) 1. Chapter 1: General Provisions 1.1 Short Title 1.2 Jurisdiction 1.3 Purpose and Effect 1.4 Enactment Authority 1.5 Amendment and Revisions 1.6
More information17.1 INTRODUCTION CONTEXT CONCLUSIONS
CHAPTER 17. FLOODPLAIN 17.1 INTRODUCTION 17.1.1 CONTEXT A floodplain is part of an extensive drainage and filtration system and water cycle that serves to contain flood waters from storms. Floodplain areas
More informationLevel 1 Downstream Analysis
Level 1 Downstream Analysis Newcastle Way Apartments Newcastle, Washington King County April 14, 2014 Revised July 10, 2014 Prepared by: Dean A. Furr, P.E. Reviewed by: Donald Scarberry, P.E. Coffman Engineering,
More informationARTICLE III COMBINED SEWERS
I ' j I' ARTICLE III COMBINED SEWERS COM'RS MIN.. VOL.281 JAN 2 2001 IMAGE Section 301 Construction; Extension of Sewers The construction of and/or extension to combined sewers are hereby prohibited, unless
More informationAppendix I. Checklists
Appendix I Checklists Town of Greenwich Drainage Manual Department of Public Works - Engineering Division Town Hall - 101 Field Point Road, Greenwich, CT 06836-2540 Phone 203-622-7767 - Fax 203-622-7747
More informationChapter 14. Stormwater Quality Introduction
14.0 Introduction This chapter addresses requirements and design criteria related to post-construction stormwater best management practices (requirements for construction erosion and sediment control are
More informationVillage of New Maryland. Storm Water Management Master Plan
Village of New Maryland Storm Water Management Master Plan Village of New Maryland Storm Water Management Master Plan Fredericton Office 80 Bishop Drive Fredericton NB E3C 1B2 Canada Telephone: +1 506
More informationSITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST PROJECT SUMMARY: Project Name: City/ETA Location: City ETA (Application fee & number of copies needed are based on location) Property Location (Legal Description
More informationReview Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision
Review Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision MEETING DATE: July 20, 2016 DRCC #: 16-4803 Latest Submission Received: June 13, 2016 Applicant: Robert McCarthy, PE PSE&G 4000 Hadley Road, 2
More informationAppendix K. Stormwater Management Plan
Regional Municipality of Halton - Steeles Avenue (Regional Road 8) Class EA - Industrial Drive to Regional Road 25/Martin Street Appendix K Stormwater Management Plan PR226401.001 Rev. 2 PR.DOT, 00/01
More informationCity of Elmhurst. City of Elmhurst. Storm Sewer System Workshop November 22, 2010
City of Elmhurst City of Elmhurst Storm Sewer System Workshop November 22, 2010 1 City of Elmhurst Watershed divide (green dashed line) through Elmhurst Area east of divide drains to Addison Creek Area
More informationTENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C. HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR ACCESS ROADS ALONG THE CONNECTICUT PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT CONNECTICUT LOOP Submitted by: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company,
More informationHCI ENGINEERING. March 27, City of Thornton, Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229
HCI ENGINEERING A division of HABERER CARPENTRY INC. March 27, 2014 Attn: Heath Klein, P.E. City of Thornton, Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 Re: Drainage Letter for
More informationBeyond Runoff Reduction: Thorough Green Infrastructure Design. Zach Sample, PE Innovyze
Beyond Runoff Reduction: Thorough Green Infrastructure Design Zach Sample, PE Innovyze Presenter Zach Sample, PE Stormwater Products Manager Innovyze Agenda Modern stormwater design (HINT: Runoff Reduction)
More informationCity of Richmond. Engineering Design Specifications
City of Richmond Design Specifications June 2008 CITY OF RICHMOND ENGINEERING DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS JUNE 2008 THIS DOCUMENT DETAILS THE MINIMUM STANDARDS TO BE USED FOR THE DESIGN OF ENGINEERING PROJECTS
More informationPRELIMINARY STAFF PLANNING REPORT TO THE WALWORTH COUNTY ZONING AGENCY X CONDITIONAL USE
This report was prepared prior to the public hearing. This report may be supplemented or amended to reflect the review of additional information presented at the public hearing and written material submitted
More informationRequest for Statement of Interest in Implementation of the Roosevelt Road Redevelopment Plan
425 Hillside Avenue Request for Statement of Interest in Implementation of the Roosevelt Road Redevelopment Plan I. INTRODUCTION The is seeking the services of a qualified consulting firm to prepare plans
More informationPlanning, Design, and Construction of Green Infrastructure.
Planning, Design, and Construction of Green Infrastructure www.water.rutgers.edu What is Green Infrastructure? an approach to stormwater management that is costeffective, sustainable, and environmentally
More informationDrexel, Barrell & Co.
Drexel, Barrell & Co. December 21, 2018 Engineers/Surveyors Boulder Colorado Springs Greeley 3 South 7 th Street Colorado Springs, Colorado 80905-1501 719 260-0887 719 260-8352 Fax El Paso County Planning
More informationBaltimore, MD Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford
MODEL STANDARD PLAN FOR POULTRY HOUSE SITE DEVELOPMENT ON MARYLAND S EASTERN SHORE MARCH 2011 1800 Washington Boulevard 410-537-3000 Gov. Larry Hogan Baltimore, MD 21230-1718 800-633-6101 Lt. Gov. Boyd
More informationBioretention cell schematic key
Bioretention Cells Bioretention cell schematic key 1 3 Hardwood mulch 2 Curb cut 3 18-30 Modified soil 4 Stone aggregate choker layer 5 Stone aggregate base layer 6 Subdrain 7 Undisturbed soil 8 Overflow/Cleanout
More informationErosion & Sediment Control Plan Application Form & Checklist
Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Application Form & Checklist GENERAL INFORMATION Application Date: Project Address: Tax Map / Parcel Number(s): PROPERTY OWNER / DEVELOPER Firm Name: Contact Person: Title:
More informationCity of Dade City AMEC Project No Dade City Stormwater Master Plan September 2012 Page 32
Page 32 3.0 MAJOR DRAINAGE SYSTEMS The 1965 Master Plan Report for Storm Drainage Facilities ( 1965 Master Plan ) identified six primary subwatersheds within the Dade City study area. Each of these areas
More informationStatus Update of Turf Work Order. January 18, 2013 MIDS Workgroup Meeting
Photo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:seededfertilizedlawn.jpg Status Update of Turf Work Order January 18, 2013 MIDS Workgroup Meeting Categories of Turf Credits 1. Impervious Surface Disconnection-turf
More informationSTORM WATER UTILITY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
STORM WATER UTILITY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS In 2007, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1155 establishing a storm water utility in the City. No fee structure was adopted at that time. The idea of
More informationA. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS B. EXISTING CONDITIONS. Table 10-1 Adjacent Storm Drains
Chapter 10: Stormwater Management A. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS This chapter describes existing and proposed stormwater management on the Site. Potential impacts to stormwater infrastructure
More informationProject Narrative For Fruita RV Resort Conditional Use Permit
Project Narrative For Fruita RV Resort Conditional Use Permit Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared by: Robert W. Jones, II, P.E. Vortex Engineering & Architecture, Inc. 2394 Patterson Rd., Ste. 201 Grand Junction,
More informationCity Development Department 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, Colorado FAX
City Hall City Development Department 9500 Civic Center Drive 303-538-7295 Thornton, Colorado 80229-4326 FAX 303-538-7373 www.cityofthornton.net Ben Swanson Dormie Capital Partners 3740 Dacoro Lane, Suite
More informationSwatara Township Stormwater Program. 1. There are no storm sewers on or near my property. Why should I pay a fee?
1. There are no storm sewers on or near my property. Why should I pay a fee? All properties produce stormwater runoff that must be managed by the Township. Even if your property has never flooded and there
More informationSouth Bismarck Watershed Model Update and Stormwater Improvement Project
Preliminary Engineering Report Bismarck Tribune South Bismarck Watershed Model Update and Stormwater Improvement Project City of Bismarck, ND January 2017 14.105.0046 1.0 Executive Summary The focus of
More informationPond Siting Report Update
Pond Siting Report Update Prepared for: Florida Department of Transportation District 5 CR 46A Realignment from SR 46 to North of Arundel Way Lake County, Florida FPID No. 238275-8-32-02 October 2013 (Draft
More informationAppendix A - Submittal Checklists
City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan Appendix A - Submittal Checklists 1. Conceptual Review Submittal Checklist 2. Landscape and Grading Permit Requirements and Checklist 3. Sufficiency Review Checklist
More informationEvaluating Low Impact Development Practices for Stormwater Management on an Industrial Site in Mississippi
Evaluating Low Impact Development Practices for Stormwater Management on an Industrial Site in Mississippi Dennis S. Painter, Tennessee Valley Authority, Nashville, Tennessee Donald Becker, Tennessee Valley
More informationPLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST
Page 1 of 8 PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS Please fill in all blanks and reference the plan sheets/pages where the information may be found, where appropriate, or write
More informationEXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS
EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS Name of Project: Poulsbo Meadows; A Planned Residential Development (PRD)/Plat Applicants Name: PBH Group LLC/Byron Harris PO Box 1010 Silverdale, WA 98038 Description
More informationCHAPTER 9 STORM DRAINAGE. Minimum Requirements for New Development and Redevelopment
CHAPTER 9 STORM DRAINAGE 9.01 General The standards established by this chapter are intended to represent the minimum standards for the design and construction of storm drainage facilities. 9.02 Design
More informationCity of Grande Prairie Development Services Department KENNEDY DEVELOPMENTS LTD. OUTLINE PLAN OP-09-01
City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department KENNEDY DEVELOPMENTS LTD. OUTLINE PLAN OP-09-01 July 27, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Plan Area Location & Context... 1 1.2 Ownership
More informationGloucester County PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST
Page 1 of 9 Gloucester County PLAN SUBMITTER'S CHECKLIST FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS Please fill in all blanks and please reference the plan sheets/pages where the information may be found,
More informationLincoln 270. City of Lincoln. Stormwater Management Plan. April 2, 2013
Lincoln 270 City of Lincoln Stormwater Management Plan April 2, 2013 # 2005.48 Prepared By: Civil Engineering Solutions, Inc. 590 E Street Lincoln, Ca 95648 (916) 645 5700 1.0 Background: The project site
More informationVillage of Forest Park. July 27, Sewer Separation Evaluation
Village of Forest Park July 27, 2015 Sewer Separation Evaluation Presentation Overview Study Background Historic Nature of Forest Park Drainage Scale of Flooding Problem Forest Park Sewer System Background
More informationMANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS
MANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS May 2007 SECTION 1 Responsibility of Applicant TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Stormwater Management Plan Required Information
More informationNEORSD Green Infrastructure Grant (GIG) Program Opening Remarks
NEORSD Green Infrastructure Grant (GIG) Program Opening Remarks 2019 NEORSD GIG Eligibility and Technical Requirements Project must be located in the Sewer District s combined sewer area Location Applicant
More information13. PRELIMINARY PLAT NO MILLS FARM - Vicinity of the southeast corner of 159 th Street and Quivira Road
13. corner of 159 th Street and Quivira Road 1. APPLICANT: HNTB Corporation is the applicant for this request. 2. REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat for a 383-lot
More informationPDR /21/15 Noah Beals 1/7/15 xx
PDR150001 1/21/15 Noah Beals 1/7/15 xx 01.07.15 HTP Harmony Frontage Infrastructure Preliminary Design Review Project Narrative a) What are you proposing/use? The HTP Harmony Frontage Infrastructure project
More informationFLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD BANK Erik Henricksen, Elena Smith, Garrett Ribas, and Meshal Alotaibi Client: Joshua Spears TA: Dr.
FOOD STORAGE FACILITY FLOODING FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD BANK Erik Henricksen, Elena Smith, Garrett Ribas, and Meshal Alotaibi Client: Joshua Spears TA: Dr. Wilbert Odem 1 BACKGROUND Figure 1: Food Bank Front
More information2016 Annual Inspection Report
2016 Annual Inspection Report for Compliance with the Coal Combustion Residuals Rule (40 CFR Part 257) Hayden Station 13125 U.S. Highway 40 Hayden, Colorado 81638 January 18, 2017 Table of Contents Certification...
More informationSEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES Drainage Design Options for street right of ways.
SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES Drainage Design Options for street right of ways. Numerous ecosystem-based functional stormwater quantity and quality design alternatives are possible within the street ROW. Several
More informationDraft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual
Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual Summary The May 2009 Public Review Draft version of the RI Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual consists of approximately
More informationCoco Palms Community Development District. Engineer s Report Infrastructure Improvements
Coco Palms Community Development District Engineer s Report Infrastructure Improvements Prepared for Coco Palms Community Development District Board of Supervisors Miami-Dade County, Florida Prepared by
More informationThree Rivers Park District Administration Center Rain Garden
Three Rivers Park District Administration Center Rain Garden Introduction There are significant changes to the hydrologic regime and nutrient loading following urban and industrial development. The post-development
More informationOP Council Resolution June 16, Planning and Development Services
OP-08-01 Council Resolution June 16, 2008 Planning and Development Services Kingsgate Landing Outline Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of Plan 1 1.2 Plan Area Location 1 1.3 Ownership
More informationWQ-23 MOUNTAINOUS AND STEEP SLOPE SITES
Greenville County Technical Specification for: WQ-23 MOUNTAINOUS AND STEEP SLOPE SITES 1.0 Mountainous and Steep Slope Sites 1.1 Description The geographic locations of portions of Greenville County are
More informationMoon Brook FRP BMP Summary Sheet. Ownership of Land where BMP is Located
Outlet Retrofit Hitzel Terrace The town owned parcel along Hitzel Terrace is a natural wetland area which currently provides some level of stormwater detention and peak-flow attenuation. The proposed project
More informationSUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP)
1) Application form and filing fee. Application Form.pdf Development Review Guide STEP 6 of 8 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) 2) Transportation Development Review
More informationATTACHMENT 1 WILSON MINE LECROY AREA SEMIPERMANENT DEWATERING SYSTEM
ATTACHMENT 1 WILSON MINE LECROY AREA SEMIPERMANENT DEWATERING SYSTEM Reclamation plans for the Wilson Mine Lecroy area were approved by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality with a passive barrier
More informationNeighborhood Drainage Infrastructure Improvements Using Green Initiatives. Village of Hinsdale, IL
Neighborhood Drainage Infrastructure Improvements Using Green Initiatives Village of Hinsdale, IL Presentation Agenda Project Overview Goals and Objectives Design Approach Public Coordination Recap Questions
More informationLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. APPENDIX G - Stormwater Study Findings & Stormwater Solutions
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN APPENDIX G - Stormwater Study Findings & Stormwater Solutions LSU: MP Narrative July 2017 3.5 Open Space Existing Conditions The
More informationNew Development Stormwater Guidelines
New Development Stormwater Guidelines CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Ecology s Minimum Requirements for stormwater management... 2 Description of the 9 Minimum Requirements...
More informationBrigitte A. Berger, Director of Engineering
Brigitte A. Berger, Director of Engineering Wilmette s Sewer System Overview of Wilmette s Sewer System Green vs. Gray? Stormwater Action Plan Regulatory Compliance Why Homes Flood What can
More informationMitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction
Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative Introduction Mitchell Ranch South is a proposed single family (detached) residential development on
More information6.5 Lakewood Gulch. Basin Snapshot
6.5 Lakewood Gulch The Lakewood Gulch Map Unit is comprised of both Lakewood Gulch and Dry Gulch (4800-01 and 4801-01) from the Denver Storm Drainage Master Plan (SDMP) and has a total drainage area of
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME LOCATION Robert Myers Robert Myers 2955 and 2989 Dauphin Street (Southeast corner of Dauphin Street and Sage Avenue) CITY
More informationChapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans
Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans The Stormwater Site Plan is the comprehensive report containing all of the technical information and analysis necessary for the City to evaluate a proposed
More informationCity of Stoughton Erosion Control Permit Application (effective 2/6/2018)
City of Stoughton Erosion Control Permit Application (effective 2/6/2018) Incomplete applications will not be accepted Project Name: Address of subject property: Landowner Name(s): Applicant Name: Landowner
More informationNotice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Scoping Meeting for the Canyon Lane Roadway Improvements Development Project
of an Environmental Impact Report and Scoping Meeting for the As the Lead Agency, the County of San Mateo (County) will prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the (project), and would like your
More informationPart 4: CRS Stormwater Management Activity (450) and Urban Flooding Best Practices
Coastal Resilience through Community Engagement Webinar Series Part 4: CRS Stormwater Management Activity (450) and Urban Flooding Best Practices 1:00 2:30pm CT 8 Today s Moderator Chad Berginnis, CFM
More information