Public Comment No. 10-NFPA [ Chapter 2 ]

Transcription

1 1 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 10-NFPA [ Chapter 2 ] Chapter 2 Referenced Publications 2.1 General. The documents or portions thereof listed in this chapter are referenced within this standard and shall be considered part of the requirements of this document. 2.2 NFPA Publications. National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA NFPA 10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers, 2013 edition. NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2016 edition. NFPA 14, Standard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems, 2016 edition. NFPA 22, Standard for Water Tanks for Private Fire Protection, 2013 edition. NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems, 2017 edition. NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, 2017 edition. NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, 2016 edition. NFPA 91, Standard for Exhaust Systems for Air Conveying of Vapors, Gases, Mists, and Particulate Solids, 2015 edition. NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2015 edition. NFPA 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, 2016 edition. NFPA 220, Standard on Types of Building Construction, 2015 edition. NFPA 241, Standard for Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations, 2013 edition. NFPA 253, Standard Method of Test for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, 2015 edition. NFPA 262, Standard Method of Test for Flame Travel and Smoke of Wires and Cables for Use in Air-Handling Spaces, 2015 edition. NFPA 286, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Evaluating Contribution of Wall and Ceiling Interior Finish to Room Fire Growth, 2015 edition. NFPA 703, Standard for Fire Retardant Treated Wood and Fire-Retardant Coatings for Building Materials, 2015 edition. 2.3 Other Publications AMCA Publications. Air Movement and Control Association International, Inc., 30 West University Drive, Arlington Heights, IL, ANSI/ AMCA 210, Laboratory Methods of Testing Fans for Aerodynamic Performance Rating, AMCA 250, Laboratory Methods of Testing Jet Tunnel Fans for Performance, AMCA 300, Reverberant Room Method for Sound Testing of Fans, APTA Publications. American Public Transportation Association, 1666 K Street NW, Washington, DC APTA SS PR -PS- S - 002, Rev 3, Standard for Emergency Signage for Egress/Access of Passenger Rail Equipment, 1998, revised 2007.

2 2 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM ASHRAE Publications. ASHRAE, 1791 Tullie Circle, NE, Atlanta, GA ASHRAE Handbook Fundamentals, ASHRAE 149, Laboratory Methods of Testing Fans Used to Exhaust Smoke in Smoke Management Systems, ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA ASTM C1166, Standard Test Method for Flame Propagation of Dense and Cellular Elastometric Gaskets and Accessories, 2006 (, reapproved 2011 ). ASTM D2724, Standard Test Methods for Bonded, Fused, and Laminated Apparel Fabrics, 2006, (2011)e1. ASTM D3574, Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials Slab, Bonded, and Molded Urethane Foams, ASTM D3675, Standard Test Method for Surface Flammability of Flexible Cellular Materials Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, ASTM D7568, Standard Specification for Polyethylene-Based Structural-Grade Plastic Lumber for Outdoor Applications, ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, ASTM E136, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Vertical Tube Furnace at 750 C, ASTM E162, Standard Test Method for Surface Flammability of Materials Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, ASTM E648, Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor-Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, 2014c. ASTM E662, Standard Test Method for Specific Optical Density of Smoke Generated by Solid Materials, ASTM E814, Standard Test Method for Fire Tests of Through-Penetration Fire Stops, 2013a. ASTM E1354, Standard Test Method for Heat and Visible Smoke Release Rates for Materials and Products Using an Oxygen Consumption Calorimeter, ASTM E1537, Standard Test Method for Fire Testing of Upholstered Furniture, ASTM E1590, Standard Test Method for Fire Testing of Mattresses, ASTM E2061, Standard Guide for Fire Hazard Assessment of Rail Transportation Vehicles, ASTM E2652, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Tube Furnace with a Cone-Shaped Airflow Stabilizer, at 750 C, California Technical Bulletins. State of California, Department of Consumer Affairs, Bureau of Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation, 3485 Orange Grove Avenue, North Highlands, CA Technical Bulletin 129, Flammability Test Procedure for Mattresses for Use in Public Buildings, October Technical Bulletin 133, Flammability Test Procedure for Seating Furniture for Use in Public Occupancies, January ICEA Publications. Insulated Cable Engineers Association, P.O. Box 1568, Carrollton, GA ICEA S ANSI /NEMA WC-57, Standard for Control, Thermocouple Extension, and Instrumentation Cables, ICEA S /NEMA WC-70, Nonshielded Power Cables Rated 2000 Volts or Less for the Distribution of Electrical Energy, 2009.

3 3 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM IEC Publications. International Electrotechnical Commission, 3, rue de Varembé, P.O. Box 131, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland. IEC , Tests for electric cables under fire conditions Circuit integrity Part 11: Apparatus Fire alone at a flame temperature of at least 750 C, IEC 62520, Railway applications electric traction, short primary type linear induction motors (LIM) fed by power converters, IEEE Publications. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Three Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY IEEE 11, Standard for Rotating Electric Machinery for Rail and Road Vehicles, 2000 (R2006), reaffirmed IEEE 16, American Standard for Electric Control Apparatus for Land Transportation Vehicles, (Withdrawn 2004) IEEE 1202, Standard for Flame-Propagation Testing of Wire and Cable, UL Publications. Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL ANSI/ UL 44, Standard for Safety Thermoset-Insulated Wires and Cables, ANSI/ UL 83, Standard for Safety Thermoplastic-Insulated Wires and Cables, ANSI/ UL 263, Standard for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, 2011, revised ANSI/ UL 1685, Standard for Vertical-Tray Fire-Propagation and Smoke-Release Test for Electrical and Optical-Fiber Cables, 2007, revised UL 1724 Outline, Outline of Investigation for Fire Tests for Electrical Circuit Protective Systems, ANSI/ UL 2196, Standard for Safety for Tests for Fire Resistive Cables, 2001, revised U.S. Government Publications. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 25, Appendix F, Part I, Vertical Test Other Publications. Merriam-Webster s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edition, Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield, MA, References for Extracts in Mandatory Sections. NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, 2016 edition. NFPA 92, Standard for Smoke Control Systems, 2015 edition. NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2012 edition. NFPA 253, Standard Method of Test for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, 2015 edition. NFPA 270, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Smoke Obscuration Using a Conical Radiant Source in a Single Closed Chamber, 2013 edition. NFPA 402, Guide for Aircraft Rescue and Fire-Fighting Operations, 2013 edition. NFPA 472, Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents, 2013 edition. NFPA 502, Standard for Road Tunnels, Bridges, and Other Limited Access Highways, 2017 edition. NFPA 921, Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, 2014 edition. NFPA 1994, Standard on Protective Ensembles for First Responders to CBRN Terrorism Incidents, 2012 edition.

4 4 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Updated SDO standard names, numbers, and editions. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 11-NFPA [Chapter I] Related Item First Revision No. 39-NFPA [Chapter 2] Relationship Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Aaron Adamczyk Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Thu May 07 22:40:51 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Action: Rejected but see related SR Resolution: SR-1-NFPA Statement: Updated per NFPA MOS.

5 5 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 4-NFPA [ Section No ] ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA ASTM C1166, Standard Test Method for Flame Propagation of Dense and Cellular Elastometric Gaskets and Accessories, 2006 (2011). ASTM D2724, Standard Test Methods for Bonded, Fused, and Laminated Apparel Fabrics, (2011)e1. ASTM D3574, Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials Slab, Bonded, and Molded Urethane Foams, ASTM D3675, Standard Test Method for Surface Flammability of Flexible Cellular Materials Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, ASTM D7568, Standard Specification for Polyethylene-Based Structural-Grade Plastic Lumber for Outdoor Applications, ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, a. ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, ASTM E136, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Vertical Tube Furnace at 750 C, ASTM E162, Standard Test Method for Surface Flammability of Materials Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, ASTM E648, Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor-Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, 2014c. ASTM E662, Standard Test Method for Specific Optical Density of Smoke Generated by Solid Materials, ASTM E814, Standard Test Method for Fire Tests of Through-Penetration Fire Stops, 2013a. ASTM E1354, Standard Test Method for Heat and Visible Smoke Release Rates for Materials and Products Using an Oxygen Consumption Calorimeter, 2014 e1. ASTM E1537, Standard Test Method for Fire Testing of Upholstered Furniture, ASTM E1590, Standard Test Method for Fire Testing of Mattresses, ASTM E2061, Standard Guide for Fire Hazard Assessment of Rail Transportation Vehicles, ASTM E2652, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Tube Furnace with a Cone-Shaped Airflow Stabilizer, at 750 C, Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment date updates Related Item Public Input No. 46-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: MARCELO HIRSCHLER Organization: GBH INTERNATIONAL Street Address: City: State:

6 6 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Apr 28 17:23:47 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Action: Rejected but see related SR Resolution: SR-1-NFPA Statement: Updated per NFPA MOS.

7 7 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 26-NFPA [ Section No ] Enclosed Station. A station or a portion thereof of the platforms that does not meet the definition of an open station. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Substantiation: The revision is meant to clarify that the definition of an enclosed station is primarily with respect to train fires. This definition is linked to that of an Open station which also needs to be revised to clarify that a train fire is the primary hazard in the criteria for defining a station as Open. Other portions of station like Service rooms at the end of platforms, concourse floor areas and other potential hazards or sources of fire are not intended to be included in the analysis for the "openness" of a station. Related Item Public Input No. 93-NFPA [Section No ] Public Input No. 94-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: PUNEET SHARMA Organization: SERECA CONSLT INC Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 15 16:59:35 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Action: Resolution: Rejected The terms open and enclosed includes areas other than platforms and fires other than train fires. The definitions of these terms are required to support existing criteria elsewhere in the standard.

8 8 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 17-NFPA [ Sections , ] Sections , Enclosed Station 15 Enclosed. A station or trainway or portion thereof that does not meet the definition of an open station * Open Station. A station that is constructed such that it is directly open where the configuration inhibits dispersion to the atmosphere and of smoke and heat are allowed to disperse directly into the atmosphere resulting from a train fire. Additional Proposed Changes File Name Description Approved Open_enclosed_ docx Proposed changes and substantiation related to definitions of open/enclosed in word format. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The revision proposed for "enclosed" (together with the proposed revisions submitted relative to PI #94) clarifies what is intended by the term as used in the Standard, which is generally to: Address hazards associated with a train fire, and Impose greater restrictions (e.g., smoke control) where the design could result in accumulation of the products of combustion from such a fire. Potential hazards associated with the impact of enclosure for other than train fires are addressed through other requirements in the standard e.g., limitation on the combustibility of construction and furnishings, fire separation between public circulation areas and other station uses. The deletion of the definition for open (together with the proposed revisions submitted relative to PI #93) is to eliminate confusion in interpretation i.e., Open has been interpreted as applying to areas in the station such as concourses relative to potential hazards other than train fires, whereas that potential is addressed through other requirements in the standard e.g., limitation on the combustibility of construction and furnishings, fire separation between public circulation areas and other station uses, and For aboveground platforms, the current NFPA 130 terminology has been interpreted as requiring engineering analysis and fire modelling (resulting in unnecessary costs), whereas it was not intended to require analysis of openness where aboveground platforms meet the 4 minute platform clearance time. Related Item Public Input No. 93-NFPA [Section No ] Public Input No. 94-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: KATHERINE FAGERLUND Organization: SERECA FIRE CONSULTING LTD Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 15 15:31:11 EDT 2015

9 9 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Committee Statement Committee Action: Resolution: Rejected The terms open and enclosed includes areas other than platforms and fires other than train fires. The definitions of these terms are required to support existing criteria elsewhere in the standard.

10 PI # Enclosed Station. A station or trainway or portion thereof that does not meet the definition of an open station where the configuration inhibits dispersion to the atmosphere of smoke and heat resulting from a train fire. Substantiation: This revision (together with the proposed revisions submitted relative to PI #94) clarifies what is intended by the term enclosed as used in the Standard, which is generally to: Address hazards associated with a train fire, and Impose greater restrictions (e.g., smoke control) where the design could result in accumulation of the products of combustion from such a fire. Potential hazards associated with the impact of enclosure for other than train fires are addressed through other requirements in the standard e.g., limitation on the combustibility of construction and furnishings, fire separation between public circulation areas and other station uses. PI # * Open Station. A station that is constructed such that it is directly open to the atmosphere and smoke and heat are allowed to disperse directly into the atmosphere. A Open Station. Direct dispersion is passing to atmosphere without ducting, without accumulation in occupied areas, and without entering or passing through another occupied level of the station. Substantiation: The deletion of the definition for open (together with the proposed revisions submitted relative to PI #93) is to eliminate confusion in interpretation i.e., Open has been interpreted as applying to areas in the station such as concourses relative to potential hazards other than train fires, whereas that potential is addressed through other requirements in the standard e.g., limitation on the combustibility of construction and furnishings, fire separation between public circulation areas and other station uses, and For aboveground platforms, the current NFPA 130 terminology has been interpreted as requiring engineering analysis and fire modelling (resulting in unnecessary costs), whereas it was not intended to require analysis of openness where aboveground platforms meet the 4 minute platform clearance time.

11 * Platform Evacuation Time. There shall be sufficient egress capacity to evacuate the platform occupant load as defined in from the station platform in 4 minutes or less * Evacuation Time to a Point of Safety. The station shall be designed to permit evacuation from the most remote point on the platform to a point of safety in 6 minutes or less. PI # Modified A The stipulated time is intended as a baseline for determining the required capacity and maximum travel distances for platform egress routes considering only the occupant load calculated in accordance with Section against the egress flow capacities and travel speeds stipulated in Sections and It is not intended that this calculation be required to account for delays due to pre-movement or products of combustion or debris along an egress route or delays due to the movement of those who are unable to achieve self-evacuation. Where the design complies with the required 4-minute platform clearance time in Section and the travel distance requirements in Sections and , evaluation of tenability as described in Chapter 7 should be along egress routes once occupants leave the platform. Where the design does not comply with those requirements, Section permits evaluation of tenability on the platform for purposes of exploring whether conditions will support longer evacuation times. A See A Substantiation: This revision clarifies advisory language related to the intent of using the 4-minute criteria to determine egress capacity and travel distances. The second paragraph clarifies how the stipulated egress times relate to the evaluation of tenability.

12 New * For open stations where the concourse is below or protected from exposure to the effects of a train fire at the platform by distance, or materials geometry, fire separation, an emergency ventilation system designed in accordance with Chapter 7, or as determined by an appropriate engineering analysis, that concourse shall be permitted to be defined as a temporary point of safety. A The use of point of safety in this context is intended to imply that the design of the station egress routes permits continued egress from the concourse to the exterior of the station For enclosed stations equipped with an emergency ventilation system designed in accordance with Chapter 7 and where the emergency ventilation system provides protection for the concourse from exposure to the effects of a train fire at the platform as confirmed by engineering analysis, that concourse is permitted to be defined as a point of safety. Substantiation: This revision provides clarity regarding the conditions that may support the determination that the concourse may be considered a point of safety. The revision also provides confirmation that the concourse should only be considered as an interim point of safety prior to final evacuation from the station.

13 7.2 Design. PI # 31 - Modified The emergency ventilation system shall be designed to do the following: (1) *Provide a tenable environment for the means of egress serving the incident platform, (2) Provide a tenable environment along the path of egress upwind from a fire incident in enclosed stations and enclosed trainways (3) Produce sufficient airflow rates within enclosed trainways to meet critical velocity (4) *Be capable of reaching full operational mode within 180 seconds (5) Accommodate the maximum number of trains that could be between ventilation shafts during an emergency (6) Maintain the required fan inlet airflow rates for a minimum of 1 hour but not less than the required time of tenability as defined in Section Substantiation: This revision is necessary to clarify the differences in evaluating tenability for stations as opposed to trainways.

14 10 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 24-NFPA [ Section No ] * Open Station. A station that is constructed such that it is directly open to the atmosphere and smoke and heat from a train fire are allowed to disperse directly into the atmosphere. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment As currently written, there appears to be no distinction as to what the source of the fire may be with regard to the 'smoke and heat in the definition. Unless specifically stated in the definition, it cannot be concluded that the intent is to consider a train fire, which I believe in the case. Related Item Public Input No. 94-NFPA [Section No ] Public Input No. 93-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: PUNEET SHARMA Organization: SERECA CONSLT INC Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 15 16:44:18 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Action: Resolution: Rejected The terms open and enclosed includes areas other than platforms and fires other than train fires. The definitions of these terms are required to support existing criteria elsewhere in the standard.

15 11 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 8-NFPA [ Section No ] This chapter shall apply to all portions of stations Section shall not apply to stations located underground. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment This ensures that the new proposed section does not apply to underground stations. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 7-NFPA [New Section after 5.2.6] Related Item Public Input No. 56-NFPA [New Section after 5.3] Relationship Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: MARCELO HIRSCHLER Organization: GBH INTERNATIONAL Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon May 04 18:01:30 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Rejected but see related SR Action: Resolution: SR-8-NFPA Statement: The building code referenced by sections allows for the installation of exposed insulation. Exposed combustible insulation in stations should be protected by a barrier to inhibit potential fire growth and spread providing a protected egress for occupants. Renumber existing as

16 12 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 15-NFPA [ Section No ] * The requirements in this chapter shall supplement the requirements of the locally applicable codes for the design and construction of stations. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The users of NFPA 130 should have additional annex information available to them to determine the risk associated with lightning and the safety of passengers waiting to board or disembarking train stations. These stations are for the most part the only shelter available to passengers during a storm and the risk assessment located in Annex L of NFPA 780 will help the user of NFPA 130 determine if the risk of loss of life/injury, loss of service, and other loss factors are tolerable for the location that a station might be constructed. The intent of this proposal is to provide annex material to NFPA 130 so that the user can find additional information on lightning protection and safety, as well as a lightning risk assessment located in NFPA 780. PI number 99 attempted to do this during the input phase by adding the asterisk after , but the additional annex material was not submitted due to either my error or the inability to navigate the TerraView system. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 16-NFPA [New Section after A.5.1.2] Related Item Public Input No. 99-NFPA [Section No ] Relationship Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: MARK MORGAN Organization: EAST COAST LIGHTNING EQUIPMENT Affilliation: NFPA 780 References Task Group Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 15 13:44:54 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Action: Resolution: Rejected Lightning protection is not within the scope of the document. If someone needed to address lightning protection they would default to NFPA 780 as the applicable standard.

17 13 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 7-NFPA [ New Section after ] Insulation Insulation shall be permitted to be installed in concealed spaces and shall be separated from the interior of the station by an approved thermal barrier consisting of 1/2 -inch (12.7 mm) gypsum wallboard or a material that is tested in accordance with and meets the acceptance criteria of both the Temperature Transmission Fire Test and the Integrity Fire Test of NFPA 275, Standard Method of Fire Tests for the Evaluation of Thermal Barriers or by 1 inch (25mm) thickness of masonry or concrete, and shall also comply with one of the requirements in through Insulation shall be tested to NFPA 286 and comply with the following requirements. (a) Flames shall not spread to the ceiling during the 40 kw (135 kbtu/hr) exposure. (b) Flames shall not spread to the outer extremities of the sample on any wall or ceiling. (c) Flashover, as described in NFPA 286, shall not occur. (d) The peak heat release rate shall not exceed 800 kw (2730 kbtu/hr). (e) The total smoke released throughout the test shall not exceed 1000 m 2 (10,764 ft 2 ) Insulation, other than cellulose loose fill insulation, shall comply with a flame spread index not exceeding 75 and a smoke developed index not exceeding 450 when tested in accordance with ASTM E Cellulose loose fill insulation shall comply with the following: (a) It shall exhibit a critical radiant flux not exceeding 0.12 W/cm 2 when tested in accordance with ASTM E970, Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Exposed Attic Floor Insulation Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, or with CPSC 16 CFR Part (b) It shall have no evidence of flaming combustion and a weight loss not exceeding 15% when tested in accordance with the smoldering combustion test in ASTM C739, Standard Specification for Cellulosic Fiber Loose-Fill Thermal Insulation, or in CPSC 16 CFR Part (c) It shall exhibit a flame spread index not exceeding 75 and a smoke developed index not exceeding 450 when tested in accordance with CAN/ULC S102.2 (Standard Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Flooring, Floor Coverings and Miscellaneous Materials and Assemblies) Materials used for duct and pipe insulation and duct and pipe coverings and linings shall comply with the following in the form in which they are used: (a) They shall exhibit a maximum flame spread index of 25 without evidence of continued progressive combustion and a maximum smoke developed index of 50 when tested in accordance with ASTM E 84, using the specimen preparation and mounting procedures of ASTM E2231, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Pipe and Duct Insulation Materials to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics. (b) They shall not flame, glow, smolder, or smoke when tested in accordance with ASTM C411, Standard Test Method for Hot-Surface Performance of High-Temperature Thermal Insulation, at the temperature to which they are exposed in service. In no case shall the test temperature be below 121 C (250 F) Penetrations within the thermal barrier shall be fire-stopped with a fire-stop that has been tested in accordance with ASTM E 814 and exhibits an F rating of 15 minutes. Also add NFPA 275 (2014) and ASTM C411 (2011), ASTM C739 (2011), ASTM E970 (2014) and ASTM E2231 (2014) and CAN/ULC S102.2 into chapter 2 on referenced standards. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment This new section fills a gap missing in NFPA 130 and is different from what was proposed at the public input stage. This comment incorporates into NFPA 130 all the necessary requirements for insulation, for use in concealed locations only. The requirements are consistent with the concepts in NFPA 130 and are more severe than the requirements that

18 14 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM are included in codes (NFPA 5000 or IBC) without direct reference to the code itself. The actual ASTM test standards are included (and not just the CPSC requirements) in the case of cellulose loose fill insulation, for use internationally. The requirements apply only to above ground stations (per added public comment to new section ) and they require that all insulation be separated from the interior of the station by an approved thermal barrier, or by 1/2 inch gypsum board or by 1 inch thick masonry. The insulation (behind the barrier) must comply with one of the following: 1. NFPA 286 room-corner test (with all the requirements that are consistent with other aspects of NFPA 130). 2. ASTM E84 Class B (consistent with all codes and so that typical insulations of all types can be used), foe everything except cellulose loose-fill insulation 3. Cellulose loose-fill insulation must met all the federal requirements (ASTM E970, smoldering test, etc.) and flame spread Class B test 4. Pipe and duct insulation must meet ASTM E84 Class A and a smoke developed index of 50 (with the appropriate mounting method for ASTM E84), as well as the ASTM C411 temperature test. Also, all thermal barriers must be fire-stopped with a fire-stop that complies with ASTM E814. The referenced standards need to be added to chapter 2. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 8-NFPA [Section No ] Related Item Public Input No. 56-NFPA [New Section after 5.3] Relationship Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: MARCELO HIRSCHLER Organization: GBH INTERNATIONAL Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon May 04 17:41:37 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Rejected but see related SR Action: Resolution: SR-8-NFPA Statement: The building code referenced by sections allows for the installation of exposed insulation. Exposed combustible insulation in stations should be protected by a barrier to inhibit potential fire growth and spread providing a protected egress for occupants. Renumber existing as

19 15 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 27-NFPA [ Section No ] * For stations where the concourse is protected from exposure to the effects of a fire at the platform by distance, geometry, fire separation, an emergency ventilation system designed in accordance with Chapter 7, or as determined by an appropriate engineering analysis, that concourse shall be permitted to be defined as a point of safety for the required time-of-tenability. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment It may not be practical to maintain this indefinitely Related Item First Revision No. 35-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Melissa Duckham Organization: SNC Lavalin Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 15 17:13:25 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Action: Rejected Resolution: The intent of the proposed change is addressed in Sections and

20 16 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 19-NFPA [ Section No ] * A mechanical emergency ventilation system shall be provided in the following locations: (1) In an enclosed system station (2) In a system underground or enclosed trainway that is greater in length than 1000 ft (305 m) Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Substantiation: This revision to the text are required to align with the terms defined in the standard. As currently written, the requirement for mechanical emergency ventilation system applies to "an enclosed system station" (as opposed to an "enclosed station" per definition in Chapter 3). A mechanical emergency ventilation system is not required for "an open system station" (as opposed to an "open station" as defined). The current text, when applied literally by AHJ, can lead to significant ambiguity. It is not clear from current text in (1) and (1) if the intent of NFPA 130 is to refer to an open or enclosed station on a transit system OR to a station on an open or enclosed transit system. Related Item Public Input No. 93-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: PUNEET SHARMA Organization: SERECA CONSLT INC Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 15 16:15:18 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Rejected but see related SR Action: Resolution: SR-3-NFPA Statement: This revision to the text are required to align with the terms defined in the standard. As currently written, the requirement for mechanical emergency ventilation system applies to "an enclosed system station" (as opposed to an "enclosed station" per definition in Chapter 3). A mechanical emergency ventilation system is not required for "an open system station" (as opposed to an "open station" as defined). The current text, when applied literally by an AHJ, can lead to significant ambiguity. It is not clear from current text in (1) and (1) if the intent of NFPA 130 is to refer to an open or enclosed station on a transit system OR to a station on an open or enclosed transit system.

21 17 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 18-NFPA [ Section No ] Where required by 7.1.2, the mechanical or non mechanical emergency ventilation system shall make provisions for the protection of passengers, employees, and emergency personnel from fire and smoke during a fire emergency. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment In the case that a nonmechanical ventilation system is required, it should be designed to meet the same criteria as a mechanical system Related Item First Revision No. 70-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Melissa Duckham Organization: SNC-Lavalin Inc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 15 16:14:10 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Rejected but see related SR Action: Resolution: SR-4-NFPA Statement: In the case that a nonmechanical ventilation system is required, it should be designed to meet the same criteria as a mechanical system

22 18 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 21-NFPA [ Section No ] The design shall encompass the following: (1) * Fire scenarios and fire profiles (2) Station and trainway geometries (3) The effects of elevation, elevation differences, ambient temperature differences, and ambient wind (4) A system of fans, shafts, and devices for directing airflow in stations and trainways (5) A program of predetermined emergency response procedures capable of initiating prompt response from the operations control center in the event of a fire emergency (6) * A method of locating the incident vehicle and the fire within it to allow prompt response from the operations control center in the event of a fire emergency (7) A ventilation system reliability analysis that, as a minimum, considers the following subsystems: (8) Electrical (9) Mechanical (10) Supervisory control (11) The systems utilized to transmit the fire location data to the operations control center A.7.2.3(6) This information should be inform the operations control center operator of both the location of the incident vehicle within the tunnel, as well as the location of the fire within the vehicle Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment This is to address the problem found in Washington Metro - the inability to quickly identify the origin of the fire. Related Item First Revision No. 79-NFPA [Section No [Excluding any Sub-Sections]] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Melissa Duckham Organization: SNC Lavalin Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 15 16:24:37 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Action: Resolution: Rejected The proponent does not provide technical justification as to why they believe the current edition does not provide a reasonable degree of determining the fire location.

23 19 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 22-NFPA [ Section No ] Thermal overload protective devices in motors or on motor controls of fans used for emergency ventilation shall not be permitted. Thermal overload protective devices in damper motors used for emergency ventilation shall not be permitted. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment For the same reason thermal overloads defeat the purpose of emergency ventilation fan motors Related Item Public Input No. 30-NFPA [Section No [Excluding any Sub-Sections]] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Melissa Duckham Organization: SNC Lavalin Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 15 16:35:27 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Rejected but see related SR Action: Resolution: SR-5-NFPA Statement: Damper motors where added for the same reason thermal overloads defeat the purpose of emergency ventilation fan motors.

24 20 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 23-NFPA [ Section No [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ] Operation of the emergency ventilation system components shall be initiated from the operations control center. The control room operator shall be reliably and accurately presented with all pertinent information necessary to make an informed decision in the operation of the emergency ventilation system. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Giving the control room operator the ability to operate the emergency ventilaiton system without the necessary information to decide in which direction to operate the system seems to defeat the purpose Related Item First Revision No. 28-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Melissa Duckham Organization: SNC Lavalin Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 15 16:39:25 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Action: Rejected Resolution: The requirements are adequately addressed in (5) of section and Chapter 9.

25 21 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 25-NFPA [ Section No ] For electrical substations and, distribution rooms serving, and rooms containing control equipment serving emergency ventilation systems where the local environmental conditions require the use of mechanical ventilation or cooling to maintain the space temperature below the electrical equipment operating limits, such mechanical ventilation or cooling systems shall be designed so that failure of any single air moving or cooling unit does not result in the loss of the electrical supply to the emergency ventilation fans during the specified period of operation. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Control equipment typically are more prone to overheating. The same rationale used for prevent the electrical distribution equipment from overheating should be applied to the control equipment which serves the emergency ventilaiton system. Related Item First Revision No. 28-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Melissa Duckham Organization: SNC Lavalin Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 15 16:52:45 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Accepted Action: Resolution: SR-6-NFPA Statement: Control equipment typically are more prone to overheating. The same rationale used for preventing the electrical distribution equipment from overheating should be applied to the control equipment which serves the emergency ventilaiton system.

26 22 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 6-NFPA [ Section No [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

27 23 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM The test procedures and minimum performance for materials and assemblies shall be as detailed in Table Table Fire Test Procedures and Performance Criteria for Materials and Assemblies Category Function of Material Test Method Cushioning Fabrics Other vehicle components Elastomers a,b,i,j Wire and cable Structural All individual flexible cushioning materials used in seat cushions, mattresses, mattress pads, armrests, crash pads, and grab rail padding a e Seat upholstery, mattress ticking and covers, curtains, draperies, window shades, and woven seat cushion suspensions a c, f h Seat and mattress frames, wall and ceiling lining and panels, seat and toilet shrouds, toilet seats, trays and other tables, partitions, shelves, opaque windscreens, combustible signage, end caps, roof housings, articulation bellows, exterior shells, nonmetallic skirts, battery case material, and component boxes and covers a,b,i k Performance Criteria ASTM D3675 I s 25 ASTM E CFR 25, Appendix F, Part I (vertical test) D s (1.5) 100 D s (4.0) 175 Flame time 10 sec Burn length 6 in. ASTM E662 D s (4.0) 200 ASTM E162 I s 35 ASTM E662 D s (1.5) 100 D s (4.0) 200 Thermal and acoustical insulation a,b ASTM E162 I s 25 ASTM E662 D s (4.0) 100 HVAC ducting a,b ASTM E162 I s 25 Floor covering b,k,l Light diffusers, windows, and transparent plastic windscreens b,i ASTM E662 D s (4.0) 100 ASTM E648 ASTM E662 CRF 5 kw/m 2 D s (1.5) 100 D s (4.0) 200 ASTM E162 I s 100 ASTM E662 D s (1.5) 100 D s (4.0) 200 Adhesives and sealants a, b ASTM E162 I s 35 Window gaskets, door nosings, intercar diaphragms, seat cushion suspension diaphragms, and roof mats All ASTM E662 ASTM C1166 ASTM E662 See through components m Flooring, n other o ASTM E119 Pass a See D s (1.5) 100 D s (4.0) 200 Flame propagation 100 mm (4 in.) D s (1.5) 100 D s (4.0) 200 See through

28 24 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM b See c See d See e See f See g See h See i See j See k See l See m See n See o See Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment In the 2014 edition adhesives and sealants were added to the list of materials to be tested to ASTM E162 and ASTM E662. Omitted in error from this change was the addition of notes a (prohibition flame dripping and running) and b (testing for smoke emission in both the flaming and non-flaming modes). Because of the various areas in the car the adhesive or sealant can be used, if flame running and dripping is not prohibited the flame running or dripping can add to the propagation of the fire to other materials in the car. Adding this note to the adhesives and sealants is consistent with the requirements of other materials in Table The inclusion of note b insures that smoke emissions in both modes are reported and evaluated. This also is consistent with the requirements for other materials in Table Related Item First Revision No. 72-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: STEVEN ROMAN Organization: LTK ENGINEERING SERVICES Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Thu Apr 30 11:18:19 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Accepted Action: Resolution: SR-7-NFPA Statement: In the 2014 edition adhesives and sealants were added to the list of materials to be tested to ASTM E162 and ASTM E662. Omitted in error from this change was the addition of notes a (prohibition flame dripping and running) and b (testing for smoke emission in both the flaming and non-flaming

29 25 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM modes). Because of the various areas in the car the adhesive or sealant can be used, if flame running and dripping is not prohibited the flame running or dripping can add to the propagation of the fire to other materials in the car. Adding this note to the adhesives and sealants is consistent with the requirements of other materials in Table The inclusion of note b insures that smoke emissions in both modes are reported and evaluated. This also is consistent with the requirements for other materials in Table

30 26 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 3-NFPA [ Section No ] During the entire fire exposure, the following parameters shall apply: (1) Transmission of heat through the assembly shall not be sufficient to raise the temperature on its unexposed surface more than 139 C 121 C (250 F) average and 181 C 163 C (325 F) single point. (2) * The assembly shall not permit the passage of flame or gases hot enough to ignite cotton waste on the unexposed surface of the assembly. (3) The assembly shall support the representative loading. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Temperatures shown in Centigrade do not match the equivalent Fahrenheit values. Also the Fahrenheit values are shown in parenthesis indicating they are secondary or reference to the Centigrade values (Ex. 139 C (250 F)). ASTM E (my current version) shows the temperature requirements in Fahrenheit with Centigrade in parenthesis. This indicates the Fahrenheit temperature is default and the Centigrade temperatures are reference. For some reason the average temperature 250 F is noted as 139 C. The actual conversion is 121 C. Similarly, the single point temperature of 325 F is noted as 181 C when the actual conversion should be 163 C. Related Item Public Input No. 3-NFPA [Chapter 7 [Title Only]] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: DAVE FORREST Organization: SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri Mar 06 11:51:52 EST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Action: Unknown Reason Resolution: The conversion in the standard is correct and is based temperature rise.

31 27 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 16-NFPA [ New Section after A ] A Information concerning lightning protection and lightning safety can be found in NFPA 780, Standard for the Installation of Lightning Protection Systems. Annex L, Lightning Risk Assesment, can be used to determine the risk from lightning, to specific passenger stations and if it is tolerable. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The users of NFPA 130 should have additional annex information available to them to determine the risk associated with lightning and the safety of passengers waiting to board or disembarking train stations. These stations are for the most part the only shelter or place of refuge available to passengers during a storm and the risk assessment located in Annex L of NFPA 780 will help the user of NFPA 130 determine if the risk of loss of life/injury, loss of service, and other loss factors are tolerable for the location that a station might be constructed. The intent of this proposal is to provide annex material to NFPA 130 so that the user can find additional information on lightning protection and safety, as well as a lightning risk assessment located in NFPA 780. PI number 99 attempted to do this during the input phase by adding the asterisk after , but the additional annex material was not submitted due to either my error or the inability to navigate the TerraView system. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Relationship Public Comment No. 15-NFPA [Section No ] Annex material for Related Item Public Input No. 99-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: MARK MORGAN Organization: EAST COAST LIGHTNING EQUIPMENT Affilliation: On Behalf of NFPA 780 References Task Group Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 15 14:18:28 EDT 2015 Committee Statement Committee Action: Resolution: Rejected Lightning protection is not within the scope of the document. If someone needed to address lightning protection they would default to NFPA 780 as the applicable standard.

32 28 of 46 12/9/2015 8:16 AM Public Comment No. 14-NFPA [ Chapter B ] Annex B Ventilation This annex is not a part of the requirements of this NFPA document but is included for informational purposes only. B.1 General. The purpose of this annex is to provide guidelines for the potential compatibility of the emergency ventilation system with the system employed with normal ventilation of trainways and stations. This annex does not present all factors to be considered in the normal ventilation criteria. For normal ventilation, refer to the Subway Environmental Design Handbook (SEDH) and the ASHRAE handbooks Fundamentals, Applications, and Systems and Equipment. Current technology is capable of analyzing and evaluating all unique conditions of each property to provide proper ventilation for normal operating conditions and for pre-identified emergency conditions. The same ventilating devices might or might not serve both normal operating conditions and pre-identified emergency requirements. The goals of the subway ventilation system, in addition to addressing fire and smoke emergencies, are to assist in the containment and purging of hazardous gases and aerosols such as those that could result from a chemical/biological release. B.2 Tenable Environments. B.2.1 Environmental Conditions. Some factors that should be considered in maintaining a tenable environment for periods of short duration are defined in B through B