Part 3, Part 6, Part 9, Part 4, and Part 13 IOP Report. Margaret Goodrich CIMug Meeting May 18, 2012

Transcription

1 Part 3, Part 6, Part 9, Part 4, and Part 13 IOP Report Margaret Goodrich CIMug Meeting May 18, 2012

2 Topics Infrastructure for IOP Tests CIM Part 3 IOP IOP Participants IOP Test Witnesses IOP Result Highlights CIM Part 6 IOP IOP Participants IOP Test Witnesses IOP Result Highlights

3 Topics Test Approach Part 3 & Part 6 Part 3 Scenarios Part 6 Scenarios CIM Part 9 IOP IOP Participants IOP Test Witnesses IOP Contents Test Scenarios

4 Topics CIM61968-Part 4 and Part 13 IOP IOP Participants IOP Test Witnesses & Test Host IOP Contents IOP Result Highlights Test Approach Part 4 & Part 13 Profile Data Groups Import/Export Exchange Tests Interoperation Tests Power Flow Tests IOP Report Contents & Status Future IOP Tests

5 Part 3, 6 & 9 Test Infrastructure All tests were remotely executed The ESB vendors performed any transformation that was necessary to transmit the messages from one Vendor to another From Generic WSDL to Strongly Typed WSDL From Strongly Types WSDL to Java Messaging Services Connectivity tests between the ESB and the Product vendors were conducted prior to the test as well as dry runs Used GoTo Meeting to allow the test witnesses to view the vendor screens, see the messages and watch the progress of the test.

6 Part 3 IOP Participants L+G AMI Oracle OMS Oracle ESB TIBCO ESB IBM ESB Alstom Grid DMS & SCADA EDF ESB EDF R&D SCADA GE OMS Telvent OMS

7 Part 3 IOP Test Witnesses David Bogen, ONCOR Electric Delivery (Transmission/Distribution Operator, USA) Frank Wilhoit, American Electric Power (AEP Transmission/Distribution Operator, USA Jim Greene, American Electric Power (AEP Transmission/Distribution Operator, USA Mark Ortiz, Consumers Energy (Transmission/Distribution Operator, USA) Hugo Bruers, Alcatel-Lucent (Belgium) Matthias Stifter, Austrian Institute of Technology (Austria)

8 Part 3 IOP Result Highlights All planned scenarios were executed All Product and ESB Vendors Passed all executed scenarios

9 Part 3 Test Approach: Scenarios

10 Part 3 Test Approach: Scenarios

11 Part 6 IOP Participants Alstom Grid DMS EDF R&D Simulator Sunflower Systems AMS IBM Maximo EDF ESB TIBCO ESB IBM ESB Oracle ESB

12 Part 6 IOP Test Witnesses David Bogen, ONCOR Electric Delivery (Transmission/Distribution Operator, USA) Frank Wilhoit, American Electric Power (AEP Transmission/Distribution Operator, USA Jim Greene, American Electric Power (AEP Transmission/Distribution Operator, USA Mark Ortiz, Consumers Energy (Transmission/Distribution Operator, USA) Hugo Bruers, Alcatel-Lucent (Belgium) Matthias Stifter, Austrian Institute of Technology (Austria)

13 Part 6 IOP Result Highlights All planned scenarios were executed All Product and ESB Vendors Passed all executed scenarios

14 Part 6 Test Approach: Scenarios

15 Part 6 Test Approach: Scenarios

16 Oracle Elster Landis + Gyr OPC Foundation Ecologic EnergyICT emeter AEP Alstom TIBCO ESB IBM ESB Oracle ESB Part 9 IOP Participants

17 Part 9 IOP Test Witnesses David Bogen, ONCOR Electric Delivery Jerry Grey and John Simmins, EPRI

18 Part 9 IOP Contents Messages Tested Include: Meter Reading End Device Control End Device Event

19 Part 9 Test Scenarios

20 Part 9 Test Scenarios

21 Part 9 Test Scenarios

22 Part 9 Test Scenarios

23 Part 9 Test Scenarios

24 Part 9 Test Scenarios

25 Part 9 Test Scenarios Request Meter Readings Sync R/R (1/2) MDM sends an on-demand meter readings request to AMI <MDM> emeter ESB sends the meter readings request to AMI without Changes. <ESB> WebSphere ESB Get(GetMeterReadings) <AMI> AEP Get(GetMeterReadings) Sync ACK Response ESB sends the ACK to MDM AMI returns an ACK to MDM synchronously without changes <MDM> emeter Get(GetMeterReadings) <ESB> WebSphere ESB Get(GetMeterReadings) <AMI> AEP

26 Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Participants Alstom Grid EDF GE Energy Open DSS Open Grid Systems Oracle Siemens SISCO SupeLec TIBCO

27 Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Test Witnesses & Test Host Alfredo Espinosa Reza, IIE (Institute for CFE, Mexico) Romano Napolitano, ENEL (DSO, Italy) Hugo Bruers, Alcatel-Lucent (Belgium) Matthias Stifter, Austrian Institute of Technology (Austria) EDF R&D Michel Barberis, Eric Lambert, Pascale Bredillet for Hosting the IOP and providing wonderful refreshments and food!

28 Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Contents CIM XML Profile Exchange tests for the Individual Profiles with a Profile Group including: Full Model Exchange (import and export) Power Flow Solutions Interoperation of full test models between two or more vendors CIM XML Profile Exchange tests for the combined Profile Group including: Full Model Exchange (import and export) Power Flow Solutions Interoperation of full test models between two or more vendors

29 Part 4 and Part 13 IOP Result Highlights All vendors imported at least one Profile Group file for one or more of the official test files. Five of the vendors ran a Power Flow solution on the imported files Seven of the vendors exported at least one set of Profile Data Group files for one or more of the official test files. All vendors executed one or more of the Interoperation Test Procedures There were also several unstructured tests generated and executed during this IOP.

30 Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Test Approach Profile Data Groups For Power Flow: Functional Electrical Properties For GIS Import: Functional Asset For Power Flow Solution Exchange: State Variables Topology

31 Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Test Approach Import/Export Exchange Tests P a rticip a n t A XM L Im p o r t/ E x p o rt C IM XML Sc he m a P a rtic ip a n t B XM L Im p o rt / E xp o rt T e st Ca s e 5.x B ro w s er XSL S t yle S h ee t XML T oo ls

32 Part 4 & Part 13 UCTE IOP Test Approach Interoperation Tests Test Case-1 Test Case-2 Step 3 CIM XML Validator Step 4 Step 1 Step 2 CIM XML Export CIM XML Import Steps 1,4 Model Maint System Step 2 Steps 1,4 CIM XML Import Step 5 Step 5 Participant A Participant B Model Maint System

33 Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Test Approach Power Flow Tests Test Case-1 CIM XML Validator (3) Test Case-2 (a previously imported/exported set of CIM XML model files used in step 1) (1) (2,5) Solution 1 CIM XML Import (1) (2) Power Flow Application A (2) CIM XML Import Solution 2 (3) (4,5) (4) Participant A Participant B Power Flow Application B

34 All IOP Reports: Contents All IOP Test Reports will contain: List of Vendors, Test Witnesses, Products and Models that were part of the test including a full list of the Official files as well as the files that were generated Detailed Test Results Product Descriptions for all participants List of all Issues that were identified and the disposition/resolution/proposed solution if possible Summary description of the Test Approach The Report will be published to all UCA members, all SGIP/SGTCC members and every major CIM mail exploder we have as well as to many Customer lists by the Vendors. This report will be posted on the UCA Web Sites (both CIM and 61850) as soon as it is published.

35 All IOP Reports: Status The Part 4 and Part 13 Test Report has been reviewed by the participants and is in final revision. This will be published next week. The Part 3 IOP Test Report has been reviewed by the participants and is in final revision. This will be published next week. The Part 6 IOP Test Report is in final draft version and will be released to the Part 6 IOP team for review next week. It will be published the first week of June. The Part 9 IOP Test Report is in final draft version and will be released to the Part 9 IOP team for review next week. It will be published the first week of June.

36 Future IOP Tests Part 13 has been transferred to WG13 and will be tested with the other WG13 profiles as part of the ENTSO-e IOP tests. Future IOP tests to vet the Distribution standards, including Part 4, 3, 6 and 9 may be tested by the WG14 teams independently. Decision will be made at the next WG14 meeting at the end of this month. Future tests will include other messages that were not tested in these IOPs. Certified IOP tests will be performed by Test Labs certified by the UCA ITCA team.

37 Additional Information UCA IOP Test Sponsors: Kay Clinard at UCA - kay@ucaiug.org Randy Lowe at AEP rrlowe@aep.com John Simmins at EPRI jsimmins@epri.com UCA IOP Test Director: Margaret Goodrich margaret@sisconet.com Margaret Goodrich Cell UCA IOP Vendor Coordinators Bruce Scovill bruce1.scovill@ge.com Eric Lambert eric.lambert@edf.fr Nada Reinprecht nadarein@au1.ibm.com Jon Fairchild jon.fairchild@telvent.com Margaret Goodrich margaret@sisconet.com IOP Host for 61850, Part 3, 4, 6, and 13: Provided hosting, sponsorship and technical consulting Eric Lambert eric.lambert@edf.fr