i.6 Under this Key Area of Change the Daresbury Strategic Site will deliver:
|
|
- Ralph Gaines
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 I.0 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Introduction i.1 Redrow Homes NW Ltd is applying to Halton Borough Council for planning permission for the development of up to 300 high quality residential dwellings, including associated green space and an access road on land to the west of Delph Lane, Daresbury, Halton (the proposed development). A Site location plan is shown in Figure NTS1. i.2 Full details of the effects of the proposed development are contained within the Environmental Statement (ES) that has been prepared to accompany a Hybrid planning application for consent under the Town and Country Planning Act (1990) (as amended). The ES provides details of the proposed works and an assessment of the potential environmental effects arising from construction and operation as required under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2011 (EIA Regulations). i.3 This document provides an updated Non-Technical Summary (NTS) of the predicted effects on the environment of the Proposed Development, updated following the update of the ES in June Background i.4 The site of the proposed development (the Site) is within Daresbury Strategic Site (Figure NTS2), as defined in the adopted Halton BC Core Strategy, which forms part of the wider East Runcorn Key Area of Change. i.5 The Core Strategy allocates land for specific uses within the Strategic Site including land for residential development, a local centre and employment. i.6 Under this Key Area of Change the Daresbury Strategic Site will deliver: 26ha of expansion for B1 science, high tech and research development at Daresbury SIC; 40ha of land for the expansion of office and knowledge based facilities at Daresbury Park; Phased delivery of 1,400 dwellings brought forward in 3 phases; and A mixed use neighbourhood centre including a marina.
2 i.7 This proposed development of up to 300 dwellings aims to begin the process of delivering the residential objectives for Daresbury Strategic Site, on land specially allocated for this purpose. The Planning Process i.8 Details of the proposed development are shown in the Masterplan (May 2013) at Figure NTS3. The outline planning application seeks to maximise the use of the first phase of the wider Daresbury Strategic Site by providing up to 300 new homes, together with: Formal and informal open space Retention, and positive management of key landscape features New access roads and a footpath / cycleway i.9 The EIA Regulations require that before consent is sought for certain types of development, an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) must be undertaken. i.10 The Regulations set out the forms of development which must always be subject to Environmental Impact Assessment (Schedule 1 development) and other developments which may require assessment (Schedule 2 development). i.11 The Council formed a Screening Opinion (dated 13 th November 2012) stating that the proposed development comprises EIA development under the Regulations, falling within Schedule 2, specifically category 10(b) Infrastructure Projects. Consultation i.12 Redrow has engaged with a number of key stakeholders such as Halton BC officers, Daresbury Parish Council, local residents and local councillors during the development of design proposals for the Site. Details of this consultation process, including the methods used and findings are represented in the Statement of Community Involvement, which accompanied the Planning Application. Content of the Environmental Statement i.13 The ES contains the following information: A description of the Proposed Development; An outline of the alternatives considered;
3 A description of the likely significant effects of the Proposed Development on the following environmental topics: Ecology; Geology and Soils; Hydrology and Flood Risk; Air Quality; Noise; Archaeology and Cultural Heritage; Landscape and Visual Impact Traffic and Transport; and Socio-Economics. A description of measures proposed to prevent, reduce or where possible off-set any significant adverse effects on the environment. Project Proposals Alternatives i.14 The Daresbury Strategic Site was subject to consideration as part of Halton BC s consideration of its Unitary Development Plan, and this was adopted following public inquiry in Following this, Halton BC included Daresbury Strategic Site in its consideration of spatial options for its Core Strategy. Following significant public consultation and a further sustainability appraisal of the options, Halton Council concluded that the Daresbury Strategic Site would be taken forward into the Core Strategy. i.15 Following sustainability appraisal and examination in public, the Halton Core Strategy Local Plan (the Core Strategy) was adopted in April i.16 Policy CS11 of the Local Plan makes specific reference to the proposed development as part of the area required to help deliver up to 1400 dwellings. i.17 In summary, Halton BC has considered alternative locations for residential development and alternative uses for this site, and has concluded that on the basis of evidence, the site is most appropriately allocated for residential development of the type proposed. A full description of the reasons why the Site is allocated is set out in the preamble to policy CS11 in the Core Strategy.
4 i.18 Alternatives have also been considered during the design phases of the proposed development, with a series of iterations of the masterplan for the site over a period of five years from 2008 to the most recent that accompanies this planning application. Alternative designs have considered housing density, layout, access arrangements, massing and appearance in addition to the extent of provision of green space, pedestrian routes and cycleways. Proposed Development i.19 The Outline planning application provides details of access, layout, scale and appearance for the first 122 homes in the southern part of the site, referred to as Phase A. Landscape details are reserved for approval at a later date. i.20 Phase B delivers up to 178 dwellings. In respect of Phase B, only access is sought for approval with all other matters reserved for approval at a later date i.21 A new link road is proposed running parallel to Delph Lane, connecting the A56 to the Site. A new signalised junction will be created on the A56. Delph Lane will be retained south of the Bridgewater Canal s eastern spur for the purposes of maintaining access for existing residents. Vehicular access to Crow s Nest, a farmstead adjacent the site, will be maintained. i.22 A network of open spaces for nature conservation and recreation including formal green space is planned to serve the residential area. The proposed development will also retain and enhance an existing pond and ditch. Landscape buffers of open space, incorporating trees and hedges will be created between the development and Delph Lane and between the development and the Bridgewater canal eastern spur. i.23 Designs for the Site promote walking and cycling routes and connect to the surrounding Public Right of Way network and contribute to the expansion of the greenway network proposed by Halton BC for the Daresbury Strategic Site. The existing public right of way crossing the site will be retained and incorporated into the development. i.24 A Construction Management Plan (CMP) will be agreed by Halton BC and will be applied to the development. This CMP will be enforceable by planning condition and will include measures to avoid, minimise or remedy potentially adverse environmental effects. Summary of Environmental Effects i.25 The following section summarises the predicted effects of the construction and operation of the Proposed Development on the environment.
5 Ecology Updated June 2013 i.26 The site does not have any designations for nature conservation interest, and is generally of low biodiversity value. Eleven ecological receptors were assessed, including the Bridgewater Canal, a ditch, arable field margins, hedgerows, ponds, bluebells, badgers, common toads, breeding birds, wintering birds and bats. i.27 There is potential for significant negative effects during the construction phase on arable field margins, hedgerows and bluebell; however in each of these cases, mitigation, compensation and on-going management measures are proposed that will result in significant residual positive effects on these receptors. i.28 There is potential for significant positive effects on the watercourse/wildlife corridor as a result of the construction phase, as new hedgerows and structure planting will ensure a continuous link of hedgerows, scrub and structure planting from the A56/Chester Road to the Bridgewater Canal, incorporating the pond and other neighbouring ponds. The proposed landscape management will ensure a significant residual positive effect on the wildlife corridor value. i.29 The Construction Management Plan (CMP) will include details of timing and programming to ensure that receptors such as nesting birds are not disturbed by construction activity. Other planning conditions will ensure implementation of the proposed new habitats. i.30 There are no significant effects on other receptors as a result of the construction or operational phases of development. The nearby Daresbury Firs Local Nature Reserve will not be adversely affected. i.31 Only one ecological receptor on this site may be significantly affected by a cumulative effect resulting from this development, in combination with all other developments at Daresbury Strategic Site. Bridgewater Canal will be affected by the future provision of a new road bridge associated with the Central Housing Area (Delph Lane residential development). Appropriate mitigation for construction and operation phase effects of a new road bridge will ensure that no significant effects result from such a bridge. This would be a condition of any future planning consent for such a bridge. i.32 In summary, eleven ecological receptors have been assessed, with nature conservation values ranging from district to immediate zone of influence. Table i.1 below summarises the findings. Table i.1: Summary of Residual Effects on Receptors of Nature Conservation Value Receptor Nature Conservation Value Residual Effect Bridgewater Canal District Neutral (eastern spur) Arable field margins Within immediate zone of Positive influence Hedgerows Local Positive
6 Receptor Nature Conservation Value Residual Effect Ponds Local Positive Watercourse/wildlife Immediate zone of influence Positive corridor Bluebell Immediate zone of influence Neutral Hyacinthoides nonscripta Badger Immediate zone of influence Neutral Bats Immediate zone of influence Positive Common toad Immediate zone of influence Neutral Wintering birds Immediate zone of influence Neutral Breeding birds Immediate zone of influence Positive i.33 Given that no receptors have a significant residual negative effect and six of the eleven receptors have a significant residual positive effect, the scheme has a net positive effect on ecological receptors. Geology and soils i.34 Existing geological conditions do not pose a significant level of risk as the site is open farmland, with no evidence of past activity that could have left a legacy of contamination. i.35 During the construction phase, there is a risk of ground and water contamination from spillages of fuel, oil and silt-laden water; however this would be avoided, reduced and remedied by the implementation of best practice guidelines. The CMP will set out the requirements to which contractors will be required to work in order to prevent adverse effects. i.36 The operational phase of the development does not pose a significant risk as it is residential use. Hydrology and Flood Risk i.37 The Site is located wholly within Flood Zone 1. i.38 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) defines flood zones as follows: - Zone 1 Low Probability less than 1 in 1000 annual probability (< 0.1%) of river or sea flooding in any year Zone 2 Medium Probability between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1000 annual probability (1% - 0.1%) of river flooding or between a 1 in 200 and 1 in 1000 annual probability of sea flooding (0.5%-0.1%) in any year Zone 3a High Probability 1 in 100 or greater annual probability (> 1%) of river flooding or a 1 in 200 or greater annual probability of flooding from the sea (>0.5%) in any year
7 Zone 3b Functional Floodplain 1 in 20 or greater annual probability (5%) of river flooding in any year. This is land on which water has to flow or be stored in times of flood. i.39 The Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) reviewed all sources of flood risk to both the proposed development and to existing adjacent property as a result of the proposals, including flood risk from fluvial, tidal, pluvial, groundwater, sewers and other artificial sources. The FRA determined that the risk from all sources is low. i.40 A desk top search for flooding events did not identify any historical flooding in the immediate area. Consultation with stakeholders also failed to identify any historical flooding at the Site. i.41 As a result of the low flood risk from all of the sources reviewed, the principal focus of the Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) is on the effective management of surface water drainage during the operational phase, by the implementation of a Drainage Management Strategy, which forms part of the Planning Application. Air Quality i.42 The nearest major road is the A56 Chester Road, which is approximately 30m from the closest point of the Site boundary. Vehicular traffic on this road will be the main source of emissions and pollutant concentrations for the residents of the proposed development. i.43 The Council has undertaken LAQM Review and Assessment of air quality for pollutants required under regulations since 1997 for the entire borough council. In 2011, the Council declared three Air Quality Management Areas (AQMAs) in Widnes for exceedances of the annual mean NO 2 objective. However, the Review and Assessment process undertaken to date has not identified any air quality issues in the area of the proposed development. i.44 The proposed development will generate some additional traffic on the local road network and will introduce additional residential exposure close to the A56 Chester Road which has daily flows in excess of 20,000 vehicles. i.45 The air quality assessment has been carried out using DMRB model together with the latest data and tools provided by Defra. These include background maps, and NO x /NO 2 converter tool. The model has been verified using monitoring data from five monitoring sites. i.46 Based on the data, methodology and assumptions used and results obtained the conclusions of the assessment are summarised below: The construction activities will result in nuisance dust issues. Mitigation measures are provided. If these are implemented there will be no significant residual impacts; All the objectives for NO 2 and PM 10 are likely to be achieved at the site and nearby receptors in 2025 when the development would complete;
8 As a result of changes to traffic due to proposed development there are either small or imperceptible decreases or increases in predicted concentrations; As the predicted annual mean concentrations in with or without scheme in 2025 are well below the objectives, the significance of air quality impacts could be considered as Negligible. Noise and Vibration i.47 A qualitative assessment of the potential noise effects of the proposed development on noise-sensitive receptors was carried out. This focussed on construction noise and noise associated with any additional traffic generated on the local highway network as a result of the completed development. i.48 A baseline noise survey was undertaken at a sample of noise-sensitive locations away from the M56 (i.e. quieter areas where potential for noise impact during the construction phase is greatest). i.49 It was concluded that the construction phase may give rise to noise effects of up to Moderate Adverse during periods where the noisiest activity is taking place at the closest points to nearby noise-sensitive receptors. This construction noise will be mitigated through the CMP, as far as is reasonably practicable, by implementing appropriate measures in accordance with the best practice guidance as set out in BS5228-1:2009. The residual noise impact at any one location from construction works is likely to be no more than of Minor significance. i.50 Potential long term traffic noise effects, resulting from operation of the proposed development, were assessed using a comparative approach. This involved investigating the difference between calculated traffic noise levels for the without development and with development scenarios, based upon anticipated future traffic flows. i.51 The noise impact of traffic generated by the proposed development on noise sensitive receptors is predicted to be negligible at most noise-sensitive locations but moderate adverse for dwellings on Delph Lane. To mitigate the noise effects on Delph Lane, an acoustic bund or fencing will be created along the new spine road; this will reduce traffic noise impact to no more than minor adverse for these dwellings. Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Updated June 2013 i.52 The proposed development area lies within a rural area that that possess some significance in terms of archaeology and cultural heritage and 23 heritage assets have been identified. There are no Scheduled Monuments, Historic Parks and Gardens, or Conservation Areas within the study area. Assets within the study area include Crow s Nest Farm; the Bridgewater Canal and the associated George Gleave s Bridge (Grade II Listed) and Keckwick Hill Bridge; possible sites for a cross and holy well; and extraction sites for stone and possibly marl.
9 i.53 The proposed development has the potential to physically and adversely affect 11 heritage assets during the construction phase. These potential effects would occur as a result of intrusive ground works associated with the construction phase, such as regrading and landscaping, excavation of building foundations and service trenches, and preparation of areas of hard-standing, such as roads. The residual effects, following mitigation, would be neutral or slight for all but one asset, the Holy Cross, which would be moderate to slight. i.54 Mitigation measures will vary, depending upon the type of potential effect. Potential effects which could result in permanent damage or destruction of heritage assets of archaeological interest, will be mitigated by preservation by record in advance of ground works, comprising archaeological excavation and the subsequent creation of a written, drawn, and photographic archive. i.55 Maintaining a targeted watching brief during intrusive ground works will be undertaken to allow two possible extraction sites to be characterised and the preservation by record of heritage assets that are of low importance. i.56 In addition, the CMP will include a method statement to ensure that no unnecessary or unintended disturbance occurs to fabric associated with the Bridgewater Canal and where any necessary disturbance of fabric associated with the canal does occur, appropriate remediation and conservation works of the affected areas will be undertaken. i.57 There are also potential temporary adverse effects on the setting of some of the assets during the construction phase. The significance of these effects would be moderate to slight for the Bridgewater Canal and moderate for Crow s Nest Farm, George Gleave s Bridge and Keckwick Hill Bridge. No mitigation of these effects is possible. i.58 Following completion of the proposed development, there are potential permanent adverse effects on the settings of these heritage assets. Following mitigation, the residual significance of these effects would be moderate to slight for the Bridgewater Canal, Crow s Nest Farm and George Gleave s Bridge and slight for Keckwick Hill Bridge. Mitigation would be through natural screening which would aid in obscuring views of the proposed development from the north and north-west, although it will not alleviate the obscuring of the historic structures by the proposed development from the east and north-east. i.59 The character and extent of specific remains associated with heritage assets within the Site is currently unknown, but have the potential to be significant. In order to effectively identify the character and extent of any targets that might represent heritage assets of archaeological interest, iterative investigative works will be undertaken, comprising: a geophysical survey, to inform and be followed by a programme of archaeological evaluation trenching. i.60 There are potential cumulative visual effects on the setting of assets as a result of adjacent developments during the operation stage. This would include a large or very large effect on the Bridgewater Canal and moderate to large effects on George
10 Gleave s Bridge, Keckwick Hill Bridge and Crow s Nest Farm. It is not possible to reduce these effects by mitigation measures. Landscape and Views i.61 The site lies in the Moore Village and Keckwick Brook Valley landscape character area, as identified by Halton BC. The published description of the character area notes that key features are prominent woodland on high ground, pockets of farmland, open space, wetland and waterside vegetation along watercourses and canals. Frequent infrastructure includes railways, roads and overhead lines which segment the landscape. The urban fringe is prominent on rising ground and commercial development at Daresbury is prominent on high ground, set within young woodland. Norton Water Tower and the tower at Daresbury SIC are noted as landmark features. The area is described as having a weak landscape strength and a moderate to poor landscape condition. i.62 The Site is not the subject of landscape designations and is not visible from the Daresbury Village Conservation Area. i.63 The significance of effects on landscape character resulting from construction activity is anticipated to be moderate adverse. In operation, the proposed development would result in a moderate adverse significance of effect on the landscape within the area defined by the Daresbury Strategic Site Allocation. At a wider scale, the significance is minor adverse, due to existing residential, road and office development being characteristic of the areas north, south and further west of the site. i.64 The principal public views of high sensitivity are experienced by users of Delph Lane, the Cheshire Ring Canal Walk, the Mersey Valley Trail and a public footpath that crosses the site. The significance of effects on public views is anticipated to range from moderate adverse to negligible, depending on distance from the new buildings and the degree to which the site forms part of the existing view. i.65 Private views of high sensitivity are experienced by residents of Crow s Nest (a farmhouse adjoining the site) and properties along Delph Lane. The significance of effects on private views is anticipated to range from moderate adverse to no effect. i.66 Measures have been incorporated into the proposed development design and layout proposals to mitigate effects on landscape and views on completion of the proposed development. Further mitigation of effects will be achieved through the CMP. i.67 The proposed layout and low density of the development enables the provision of a robust landscape structure. The new access road will be subject to roadside planting and coupled with additional planting in the proposed open space west of Delph Lane, over time the character of the residential landscape will assume the appearance of housing within a wooded setting, as occurs in development at Norton, on the western flanks of the Keckwick Brook Valley.
11 i.68 Taking account of mitigation in the design and layout, residents of Crow s Nest and Delph Lane alongside the site would experience a moderate adverse effect on views from ground-floor windows. i.69 A cumulative visual assessment has been carried out, taking account of all consented development and all future allocations for the Daresbury Strategic Site. This indicates that for all receptors which would experience a moderate adverse effect from this development, the effect would not become of greater adverse significance due to future predicted development. Traffic and Transport i.70 The Site is to be served from the junction of the A56 Chester Road with Delph Lane. Delph Lane is an unclassified single carriageway road typically 3-4 metres wide with passing places. The A56 is a high capacity dual carriageway linking Runcorn and the M56 to Warrington. i.71 During the construction phase, the only viable means of HGV access to the Site is directly off the A56, and this will form the approved access route to the Site for all construction traffic. i.72 The development of up to 300 homes, at an anticipated completion rate of 30 homes per annum will result in steady construction activity over a period of up to 10 years, with first occupation expected for early During this period, delivery of construction materials will be needed on a routine basis. In addition, there will be traffic movements associated with site personnel and management. i.73 The proposed development will create new movements, on foot, by cycle, by bus and by car. These will be for a variety of purposes but the dominant movements will be journeys to work, to schools and colleges, and for shopping and leisure purposes. To reduce the potential effects of generated traffic, the proposed development is being designed and travel planning put in place to minimise the impact of generated traffic. i.74 Traffic is to be routed directly from the Site to the strategic road network (A56) minimising the effects on the local road network. The capacity of the adjacent strategic road network is large, traffic flows are large and hence the percentage impact of the generated traffic is small. i.75 An upgraded signalised junction will be provided at the junction of the link road with the A56. This junction can safely and efficiently accommodate the traffic generated by the development and in the longer term by traffic from a completed spine road serving areas north of the canal. i.76 To encourage pedestrian and cycle usage, dedicated facilities across the A56 are to be provided as part of the Delph Lane junction improvement and a footway/cycleway is to be provided along the west side of the A56 between Delph Lane and Red Brow Lane enabling cycling from the development to Daresbury Park and destinations to the west, including East Runcorn Rail Station.
12 i.77 Cumulative effects of the proposed development are considered within the context of the East Runcorn Sustainable Transport Study (2011) (The Study). The provision of the new link road from the A56 is a key component of the Study. The proposed development will provide the first stage of the road. In the short term the traffic flows along the road will be very modest only serving the proposed development of 300 homes. In the long term this road will be primarily used by traffic to an expanded DSIC site and other residential developments further west. Traffic volumes on this road will increase from 600 vehicles per day to 6500 per day. However the link road and its junction with the A56 have been designed to accommodate the much higher long term volume. i.78 The Study describes the cumulative transport effects, and the degree to which the highway impacts are mitigated by the proposed improvements. The Study also identifies that alternatives to the car are needed to reduce congestion and provide sustainable travel. The proposed development will provide a range of mitigation measures which are fully compliant with the findings of the Study and a financial contributions package is currently being developed by Halton BC in conjunction with developers to ensure delivery of longer term measures. Socio-Economics i.79 Halton Borough is home to 125,700 1 residents of which 15% are over the age of 65, up slightly from 14% a decade earlier. The trend for an expansion in the retirement population is estimated to accelerate from 2011 to i.80 Halton s Core Strategy recognises an acute need for the borough to offer a more diverse housing mix than the current stock provides. i.81 Halton has some of the highest rates of unemployment in the country (currently ranked 7th out of 326 districts) and the lowest rates of enterprise (15th out of 326 districts), pointing to the underlying weakness in the local economy. i.82 The socio-economic assessment also assessed the social and health infrastructure provision in the local area: there are a number of nursery providers and primary schools within a 3km radius of the Site and there is one secondary school; Halton General Hospital is less than 4km from the Site and there are three GP surgeries within 3km of the Site. i.83 The proposed development is expected to deliver a number of positive impacts for Halton: An increase in the local resident population of 880 people, 66% of which will be of working age and can help to redress the widening imbalance in the population of Halton. It is important to maximise retention of the working age population in order to strengthen the local labour market. 1 Census 2011
13 A temporary increase in construction jobs over the estimated ten year build period, amounting to c.76 employment opportunities. A permanent increase in local employment opportunities through the increased household expenditure in the local economy. This could create up to 31 new jobs. The building of new homes in the proposed development could help to address local unemployment in the industry, and provide apprenticeship and training opportunities for young unemployed people. A permanent increase in the supply of skilled labour which could help to address skill gaps and increase the productivity of local employers. The proposed development will place demands on the existing social and community infrastructure but the assessment shows there is sufficient capacity to meet these demands. Summary and Conclusions i.84 Table i.2 provides a summary of the residual (i.e. with mitigation in place) environmental effects of the proposed development. Table i.2: Summary of residual* environmental effects Topic Construction phase Operation phase Ecology Beneficial Beneficial Geology and soils No significant effect No significant effect Hydrology and Flood Risk No significant effect No significant effect Air quality No significant effect Negligible effect Noise Minor adverse Minor adverse Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Slight to moderate Slight to moderate Landscape Moderate adverse Moderate adverse Views Moderate adverse Moderate adverse Traffic and Transport Minor adverse No significant effect Socio-economic Moderate beneficial Moderate beneficial *Summarises residual effects on the basis of the worst or most significant effect identified. i.85 This document is a concise summary of the Environmental Statement prepared to accompany the application for planning permission at land west of Delph Lane, Daresbury, Halton. Full copies of the Environmental Statement and the Appendices
14 are available to view at Halton Borough Council Offices, Municipal Bldg Kingsway, Widnes, Cheshire WA8 7QF. i.86 Copies are available to purchase from TEP at the following costs: Printed copy of the Environmental Statement with drawings ; Printed copy of the Environmental Statement with drawings and all appendices ; and CD containing a copy of the Environmental Statement with drawings and appendices TEP, Genesis Centre, Birchwood Science Park, Warrington, WA3 7BH ( )
University Park, Worcester Non Technical Summary December 2011
University Park, Worcester Non Technical Summary December 2011 Introduction UW Wrenbridge LLP, a Joint Venture Company of the University of Worcester and Wrenbridge Land Ltd (the Applicants ) intend to
More informationGrantham Southern Quadrant Link Road Environmental Statement
Grantham Southern Quadrant Link Road Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary Introduction Lincolnshire County Council (LCC) is submitting a planning application for the proposed implementation of
More informationLAND AT HOWES LANE, BICESTER ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY. March 2017 Our Ref: Q70433
LAND AT HOWES LANE, BICESTER ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY March 2017 Our Ref: Q70433 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND SITE DESCRIPTION... 1 2 EIA METHODOLOGY... 5 3 ALTERNATIVES... 6 4 DESCRIPTION
More informationLondon Road, Derker. Non Technical Summary. Introduction
London Road, Derker Non Technical Summary Introduction The Oldham Rochdale Housing Market Pathfinder was set up to tackle longstanding problems of poor quality housing and to provide the framework for
More informationLand at BROOK STREET PROPERTIES TENCREEK FARM, LISKEARD. Environmental Statement: Non-Technical Summary
BROOK STREET PROPERTIES TENCREEK FARM, LISKEARD Land at Environmental Statement: Non-Technical Summary Introduction Brook Street Properties is applying to Cornwall Council for outline planning permission
More informationNewcourt Masterplan. November Exeter Local Development Framework
Newcourt Masterplan November 2010 Exeter Local Development Framework Background The Exeter Core Strategy Proposed Submission sets out the vision, objectives and strategy for the development of Exeter up
More informationFormer RAF Sealand Site EIA
Praxis (Holdings) Ltd. Former RAF Sealand Site EIA Environmental Statement - Non Technical Summary February 2012 in association with P a g e 1 1. Introduction Praxis (Holdings) Ltd. is applying to Flintshire
More informationLongbridge Town Centre Phase 2 Planning Application
Longbridge Town Centre Phase 2 Planning Application Non-Technical Summary of the Environmental Statement December 2013 Introduction A full application for Planning Permission has been submitted to Birmingham
More informationBREEDON NORTHERN LIMITED
Non Technical Summary CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 2 SITE DESCRIPTION... 1 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT... 6 4 NEED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT... 8 5 KEY ISSUES CONSIDERED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT...
More informationWyvern Park Skipton Environmental Statement. Non-technical Summary - April 2015
Wyvern Park Skipton Environmental Statement Non-technical Summary - April 2015 BWB Consulting Ltd Whitehall Waterfront 2 Riverside Way Leeds LS1 4EH Telephone: +44(0)113 233 8000 Copyright This Report
More informationABBEY MANOR GROUP/SAINSBURY S SUPERMARKETS LTD
ABBEY MANOR GROUP/SAINSBURY S SUPERMARKETS LTD Mixed Use Development including Business Park and Foodstore Land at Bunford Park, Bunford Lane, Yeovil Environmental Statement: Non-Technical Report June
More informationReplacement Golf Course Facilities and Residential Development, Churston. Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary
Replacement Golf Course Facilities and Residential Development, Churston Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary July 2011 Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey s map with the permission of the Controller
More informationMoat Lane Regeneration Project Environmental Statement
AECOM Environment Towcester Regeneration Ltd. October 2012 Moat Lane Regeneration Project Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary Prepared by:... Checked by:... Sophie Collins Scott Wilson Environmental
More informationLAND SECURITIES REDEVELOPMENT OF NEWNHAM COURT SHOPPING VILLAGE, MAIDSTONE
LAND SECURITIES REDEVELOPMENT OF NEWNHAM COURT SHOPPING VILLAGE, MAIDSTONE Land at Environmental Statement: Non-Technical Summary Introduction Land Securities plc is applying to Maidstone Borough Council
More informationNON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY
Hybrid outline/detailed planning application comprising an outline planning application for 196 residential dwellings, landscaping, open space, estate roads and infrastructure, plus 4 permanent gypsy and
More informationƱ ± ªº Œª ºª ø ª ª ± ª
Ʊ ± ªº Œª ºª ø ª ª ± ª ø º Õ± ± ± Œ±øºÙ Õ ß Æª ø檺 ±Æ ƪ ø檺 æß Æ± Ʊ ª ø ø fl ª ª ± ê ø Õ øæß ª ª æªæ Ó ÔÌ Non-Technical Summary Introduction A planning application has been submitted to the Vale
More informationLAND AT MIDDLETON STONEY ROAD AND HOWES LANE, BICESTER ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY. June 2017 Our Ref: Q70433
LAND AT MIDDLETON STONEY ROAD AND HOWES LANE, BICESTER ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY June 2017 Our Ref: Q70433 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 2 SITE DESCRIPTION... 5 3 EIA METHODOLOGY...
More informationWELCOME GYPSY LANE. Wider Site Location plan. Proposals for the development of LAND OFF FOXLYDIATE LANE WEBHEATH. Proposals for the development of
WELCOME The developers are preparing an outline planning application for a residential led development and need the community s views in order to develop the proposals further WHAT IS PROPOSED? A high
More informationCardiff International Sports Village Waterfront Development Volume IV : Non-Technical Summary of the Environmental Statement
Greenbank Partnerships Ltd October 2012 Cardiff International Sports Village Waterfront Development Volume IV : Non-Technical Summary of the Environmental Statement Environmental Statement - Non Technical
More informationDEFGH. Crystal Place Park. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Elin Thomas and Emily Low Waterman Environmental
DEFGH Crystal Place Park Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Elin Thomas and Emily Low Waterman Environmental 10.12.07 EIA Presentation Content What is EIA? Legal Requirements Process Q&A Key Topics
More informationSouth Whitehaven, Cumbria EIA
South Whitehaven, Cumbria EIA Environmental Statement - Non Technical Summary June 2013 in association with 1. Introduction Story Homes is applying to Copeland Borough Council (CBC) for a new residential
More informationSustainability Statement. Whitby Business Park Area Action Plan
Sustainability Statement Whitby Business Park Area Action Plan November 2014 Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Scoping 3 3. Sustainability Appraisal of Options 6 4. Assessment of Draft Area Action Plan
More informationPublic Consultation. Land at Monks Farm, North Grove. Welcome
Welcome Welcome to our public exhibition for development on Land at Monks Farm, orth Grove. Gallagher Estates and Gleeson Strategic Land are preparing an outline planning application for new homes, open
More informationWELCOME. Land North of STEVENAGE. We would like to thank you for attending our public exhibition today.
WELCOME We would like to thank you for attending our public exhibition today. The purpose of this event is to share our proposals and hear your thoughts on our ideas. Members of the project team are on
More informationEnvironmental Statement (Volume 1) Non Technical Summary
Environmental Statement (Volume 1) Non Technical Summary Prepared by: The Environment Partnership Haydock Point Environmental Statement (Volume 1): Non-Technical Summary March 2017 Contents 1. Introduction
More informationBarvills Solar Farm Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary
Barvills Solar Farm Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary 13 March 2015 Produced for Prepared by St John s House Queen Street, Manchester M2 5JB Contents Contents... 2 1 Introduction... 3 1.1 Development
More informationPANSHANGER QUARRY, Hertfordshire
PANSHANGER QUARRY, Hertfordshire Proposed enhanced restoration of Phases F & H Briefing Note 1 March 2015 INERT (INACTIVE) RESTORATION MATERIALS, CONTROLS AND OPERATIONS 1 Introduction This briefing note
More informationTown and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations) 2011 SCOPING OPINION
Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations) 2011 SCOPING OPINION Application Site and Description of Development Proposed new quarry at Culham, Oxfordshire Land and Mineral
More informationSOUTH EAST LINCOLNSHIRE LOCAL PLAN: HOUSING PAPER DONINGTON (JUNE 2016)
SOUTH EAST LINCOLNSHIRE LOCAL PLAN: HOUSING PAPER DONINGTON (JUNE 2016) 1 DONINGTON S PLACE IN THE SPATIAL STRATEGY 1.1 Policy 2 of the South East Lincolnshire Local Plan 2011-2036 Draft for Public Consultation
More informationStatement of Community Involvement LAND OFF SOUTHDOWN ROAD HORNDEAN, HAMPSHIRE
LAND OFF SOUTHDOWN ROAD HORNDEAN, HAMPSHIRE CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Pre-application Discussions 4 3. The Consultation Process 5 4. Consultation Feedback 7 5. Responses to Consultation Feedback
More informationGreat Easton Neighbourhood Plan Statement of Basic Conditions
Great Easton Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2031 Statement of Basic Conditions OCTOBER 2016 GREAT EASTON PARISH COUNCIL Contents 1.0 Introduction....Page 2 2.0 Summary of Submission Documents and Supporting Evidence..
More informationNON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY
Proposed Sand and Gravel Extraction and Associated Processing Operations with Restoration to a Mixture of Agriculture and Nature Conservation including Areas of Shallow Water at Hedgeley, Northumberland
More informationTaylor Wimpey UK Ltd Proposed Development at Haydock Grange, Hoyles Lane, Preston Non-Technical Summary Revision 1 October 2011
Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd Proposed Development at Haydock Grange, Hoyles Lane, Preston Non-Technical Summary Revision 1 October 2011 Introduction An application for outline planning permission has been submitted
More informationWelcome. Site/11/04. Site/11/03. Proposed Site. 11,400 new homes needed in east Cambs
Welcome Welcome to our consultation on our proposals for new homes on land north east of Soham Road, Fordham. Members of the project team are available to answer any questions you have and listen to feedback.
More informationLAND AT WEST YELLAND. Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary Welbeck Strategic Land LLP
LAND AT WEST YELLAND Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary Welbeck Strategic Land LLP May 2014 Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Draft FINAL Date
More informationBloor Homes Stubbocks Walk North Hertfordshire ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY
Bloor Homes Stubbocks Walk North Hertfordshire ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY December 2016 Environmental Statement: Non-Technical Summary Stubbocks Walk, North Hertfordshire J S Bloor
More informationSchedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May Reference: 06/17/0726/F Parish: Hemsby Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date:
Schedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May 2018 Reference: 06/17/0726/F Parish: Hemsby Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date: 22-05-2018 Applicant: Proposal: Site: Mr Gillett Change of use to the
More informationPERSIMMON HOMES (SW) LIMITED LAND AT ADDINGTON, LISKEARD ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY
PERSIMMON HOMES (SW) LIMITED LAND AT ADDINGTON, LISKEARD ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY APRIL 2010 INTRODUCTION This document is the Non-Technical Summary (NTS) of an Environmental Statement
More informationRochford District Council Allocations Development Plan Document: Discussion and Consultation Document Sustainability Appraisal
Option SWH1 Balanced Communities Option SWH1 1 To ensure the delivery of high quality sustainable communities where people want to live and work Will it ensure the phasing of infrastructure, including
More informationComments on the proposed scope are requested from WCC/NBBC officers to be provided to SLC Rail by 25 th March 2016 and sent to
Introduction WCC have indicated that in advance of the surveys and assessments being undertaken consultation should be undertaken with technical officers of both Warwickshire CC and Nuneaton and Bedworth
More information9 Archaeology & Cultural Heritage
High Clachaig Wind Farm Scoping Report Page 56 9 Archaeology & Cultural Heritage 9.1 Introduction Cultural heritage in this context means the above- and below-ground archaeological resources, built heritage,
More informationMeridian Water Phase 1 Application
Meridian Water Phase 1 Application MW11 Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary London Borough of Enfield March 2016 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The proposed development 2 3 Evolution of the proposed
More informationThe Place Solar Farm
The Place Solar Farm Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary 28 August 2014 Produced for Prepared by St John s House Queen Street, Manchester M2 5JB Contents Contents... 2 1 Introduction... 3 1.1
More information7 Scoping and Introduction to the Assessments
7 Scoping and Introduction to the Assessments 7.1 Scope of the assessments 7.1.1 Rule 8 of the TWR makes provision for an applicant to request a scoping opinion from the SoS indicating the information
More informationSouth Macclesfield Development Area Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary March 2017
South Macclesfield Development Area Environmental Statement March 2017 Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2 1.1 Background... 2 1.2 Environmental Assessment... 2 1.3 Site Description... 2 2.0 The Proposals...
More informationFrequently Asked Questions
1. Where is Aylesbury Woodlands? Frequently Asked Questions Aylesbury Woodlands lies to the east of Aylesbury. It is bounded to the south by the A41. To the north is the Aylesbury Arm of the Grand Union
More informationEnvironmental Impact Assessment
Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is the process of systematically drawing together an assessment of the likely significant environmental effects of a development project.
More informationLONDON BRIDGE STATION ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY
LONDON BRIDGE STATION ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY June 2011 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 INTRODUCTION CONTENTS Page 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 The Site 4 3 THE DEVELOPMENT 3.1 What is it? 5 3.2
More informationKings Road Industrial Development, Immingham. Environmental Impact Assessment. Non Technical Summary
Environmental Impact Assessment Non Technical Summary Report prepared by: Ecus Ltd. Brook Holt 3 Blackburn Road Sheffield S61 2DW 0114 266 9292 December 2013 Page left intentionally blank INTRODUCTION
More informationCranbrook EXPANSION ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT: NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY PRODUCED BY DAVID LOCK ASSOCIATES
Cranbrook EXPANSION ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT: NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY PRODUCED BY DECEMBER 2014 CRANBROOK EXPANSION AREAS ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY Submitted in support of Outline Planning
More informationSite ref: AS06 Site Name or Address: Murreys Court, Agates Lane
Site ref: AS06 Site Name or Address: Murreys Court, Agates Lane Proposed Land Use: Total Site Area (Ha): Housing 1.85 Ha Description: It is understood that the owner has no plans to dispose of the site
More informationNON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY
NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY THE HIDE, BISHOP AUCKLAND PROPOSED ECO CHALET DEVELOPMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY 1 Introduction 1.1.1 This non-technical summary for the (ES) prepared in relation to the proposed eco-chalet
More informationKilnw Envir ood Vale onmental Statement Volume 3: Non Technical Summary July 2010
Kilnwood Vale Environmental Statement Volume 3: Non Technical Summary July 2010 Kilnwood Vale Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental Statement Volume 3 KILNWOOD VALE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL
More informationThornton Road, Pickering Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary. January 2016
Thornton Road, Pickering Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary January 2016 EIA Quality This Environmental Statement, and the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) carried out to identify the significant
More information8.0 Design and Form of Development 43/
42/ 8.0 Design and Form of Development 43/ Rothwells Farm, Golborne/ Development Statement Figure 7. Site Constraints Key 44/ Site Boundary 360 Bus Route/Stops Existing Trees Underground Water Pipe Sensitive
More informationThe Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Wales) Regulations 2016, Regulation 13 Scoping Opinion
Mr Graham Clark Berrys Newchurch Farm Kinnersley Hereford HR3 6QQ BY EMAIL The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Wales) Regulations 2016, Regulation 13 Scoping Opinion SC/2017/0001
More informationPINEWOODS HOLIDAY PARK: HORSE PADDOCK. Non-Technical Summary
PINEWOODS HOLIDAY PARK: HORSE PADDOCK June 2014 1 Introduction 1.1 The existing Pinewoods Holiday Park is located approximately 1 km to the north of Wells-nextthe-Sea on the north Norfolk coast. Pinewoods
More informationParish of Repton NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Parish of Repton NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN BASIC CONDITIONS STATEMENT December 2018 CEF 4 Legal Requirements This statement has been produced by the NDP Working Group on behalf of Repton Parish Council
More informationWatford Local Plan Part 2 Publication Stage Environmental Report. Appendix 3: Consultation Comments
Watford Local Plan Part 2 Publication Stage Environmental Report Appendix 3: Consultation Comments August 2016 Appendix 3 - Responses to Consultation of the Local Plan Part 2 As required by the SEA Directive,
More informationES 5. Drakelow Park. Environmental Statement. Volume 5: Non Technical Summary. Lead Author Waterman Energy, Environment and Design Ltd
Drakelow Park ES 5 Environmental Statement Volume 5: Non Technical Summary Lead Author Waterman Energy, Environment and Design Ltd April 2009 Environmental Statement Volume 5: Non-Technical Summary DRAKELOW
More informationNeighbourhood Planning Site Assessment Pro-forma and Guide Version 2
Neighbourhood Planning Site Assessment Pro-forma and Guide Version 2 September 2014 Site HNP 006 Land East of Stanbridge Road and North of Lower Road 1. Background information Site location and use Site
More informationLand at Rampton Road. Cottenham
Land at Rampton Road Cottenham Introduction TEP is preparing an outline planning application for 54 dwellings on 6.9 hectares of land adjacent to Rampton Road, Cottenham on behalf of the owners Cambridgeshire
More informationSOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. REPORT TO: Planning Committee 1 April 2015 Planning and New Communities Director
SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL REPORT TO: Planning Committee 1 April 2015 AUTHOR/S: Planning and New Communities Director Application Number: Parish(es): Proposal: Site address: Applicant(s): Recommendation:
More informationRequest for a Scoping Opinion by Provectus. Proposed Surface Mining of Coal on Land west off the A61, Hill Top Farm, Clay Cross, Derbyshire
Request for a Scoping Opinion by Provectus Proposed Surface Mining of Coal on Land west off the A61, Hill Top Farm, Clay Cross, Derbyshire January 2012 Contents 1 Introduction & Background... 1 2 Site
More informationPerth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 8 June Pre-Application Report by Development Quality Manager
Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 8 June 2016 5(3)(i) 16/259 Pre-Application Report by Development Quality Manager Residential development at St Martins Road, Land 120 metres West
More informationWHITELEY TOWN COUNCIL NORTH WHITELEY DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 2014
WHITELEY TOWN COUNCIL NORTH WHITELEY DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 2014 Dear Resident This Special Edition of the Whiteley Voice which has been prepared in conjunction with the North Whiteley Consortium is to
More informationFlorida Farm North. Environmental Statement. Non-Technical Summary. July /04/MW/PN
Florida Farm North Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary July 2016 41575/04/MW/PN Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners 3rd Floor One St James's Square Manchester M2 6DN 01618376130 www.nlpplanning.com
More informationFollingsby Park South Environmental Statement: Volume 1: Non Technical Summary (March 2018)
Follingsby Park South Environmental Statement: Volume 1: Non Technical Summary (March 2018) 1.0 Introduction and Methodology 1.1 This document is a summary in non-technical language of an Environmental
More informationKibworth Harcourt. Introduction. Introduction
Introduction Introduction Welcome to this public exhibition on the proposals for the delivery of new homes on land at The Kibworths. The purpose of today s exhibition is to give you the opportunity to
More informationLAND NORTH OF NETHERHOUSE COPSE, FLEET
REPORT N O 70020067 LAND NORTH OF NETHERHOUSE COPSE, FLEET ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT VOLUME 3:NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT PUBLIC JUNE 2016 LAND NORTH OF NETHERHOUSE COPSE, FLEET
More informationDUNSFOLD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Site Selection Policies
DUNSFOLD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Site Selection Policies The criteria for assessing sites for future housing and business development in Dunsfold are set out below. (Development criteria, covering what it is
More informationTāhuhu whakaruruhau ā-taone The sheltering ridge pole
B2. Tāhuhu whakaruruhau ā-taone - Urban growth and form B2.1. Issues Tāhuhu whakaruruhau ā-taone The sheltering ridge pole Auckland s growing population increases demand for housing, employment, business,
More information17A. Wind Microclimate
17A. Wind Microclimate 17A.1 Introduction 17A.1.1 17A.1.2 17A.1.3 17A.1.4 This Chapter, which has been prepared by Waterman and BMT, provides further information with regard to the potential wind microclimate
More informationCotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines. June 2016
Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines June 2016 Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines Introduction The evolution of the landscape of the Cotswolds AONB is a result of the interaction
More informationWelcome to our exhibition
Welcome to our exhibition The Homes & Communities Agency (HCA) welcomes you to this public exhibition explaining our proposals for the redevelopment of the former Lea Castle Hospital site. About the Homes
More informationNon-technical summary
Non-technical summary Introduction NTS.1 is applying for outline planning permission for a residential development of up to 80 dwellings on land at Hambrook, on the northern fringe of Bristol. NTS.2 An
More informationLAND WEST OF ST ANDREWS ROAD
LAND WEST OF ST ANDREWS ROAD ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT VOLUME 3 - NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Submitted by Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners on behalf of Redrow Homes Limited July 2014 Applicant: Consultant Team:
More informationA38 Derby Junctions. Preliminary Environmental Information Report: Non-Technical Summary
Preliminary Environmental Information Report: Preliminary Environmental Information Report Report No: P01 S4 September 2018 Table of contents Introduction... 1 The proposed scheme... 2 Scheme details...
More informationAppendix 1 Structure plan guidelines
Appendix 1 Structure plan guidelines This appendix forms part of the regional policy statement [rps]. 1.1. Introduction Structure plans are an important method for establishing the pattern of land use
More informationLower Herne Village Hollamby Estates (2005) Ltd Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary June 2015 INSERT PICTURE HERE
Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary June 2015 INSERT PICTURE HERE Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 SITE LOCATION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3 3 THE ASSESSMENT 8 4 CONCLUSIONS 16 5 WHAT HAPPENS
More informationNON TECHNICAL SUMMARY
NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY INTRODUCTION NTS.1 CEMEX UK Properties Limited is applying for planning permission to South Cambridgeshire District Council (SCDC) for the redevelopment of the former CEMEX cement
More informationVALLEY PARK, DIDCOT. Non-Technical Summary. December On behalf of Taylor Wimpey UK Limited, Persimmon Homes and Hallam Land Management Ltd.
VALLEY PARK, DIDCOT Non-Technical Summary December 2014 On behalf of Taylor Wimpey UK Limited, Persimmon Homes and Hallam Land Management Ltd. CONTENTS 1 Introduction... 2 2 The Proposed Development...
More informationWelcome to our Public Consultation
About our development This exhibition gives you the chance to view and comment on our emerging plans for a proposed residential development located on land to the West of Alwyn Road, Rugby. Welcome to
More informationPlumpton Neighbourhood Development Plan Revised Pre Submission Document - Regulation 14 Consultation
REPRESENTATIONS... Plumpton Parish Council Plumpton Neighbourhood Development Plan Revised Pre Submission Document - Regulation 14 Consultation Representations submitted on behalf of: Cala Homes (South
More informationDunsbury Hill Farm. Environmental Statement - Non Technical Summary. Portsmouth City Council
Dunsbury Hill Farm Environmental Statement - Non Technical Summary Portsmouth City Council March 2012 1 2 Environmental Statement: Non Technical Summary March 2012 3 4 Introduction A planning application
More informationMAIDSTONE MEDICAL CAMPUS LTD LAND AT NEWNHAM PARK, MAIDSTONE
MAIDSTONE MEDICAL CAMPUS LTD LAND AT NEWNHAM PARK, MAIDSTONE Land at Environmental Statement: Non-Technical Summary Introduction Maidstone Medical Campus Ltd is applying to Maidstone Borough Council for
More informationWelcome to the Public Consultation Exhibition
Welcome to the Public Consultation Exhibition Today is your opportunity to: Speak to the team Learn more about the project Leave feedback on the plans The Secretary of State for Transport has recognised
More informationSPG 1. * the northern and western sections which are open fields used for pasture and grazing;
SPG 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION This development brief is based on the allocation of the Priors Hall site for employment and countryside recreational purposes in the Corby Borough Local Plan. The brief is intended
More informationThe Trustees of the Standen Estate Land South of Clitheroe Non-Technical Summary
1 The Trustees of the Standen Estate Land South of Clitheroe Non-Technical Summary 1. Introduction This report summarises the results of an assessment that has been undertaken to determine how a proposed
More informationReserved Matters application for a site that straddles the boundary between CBC and BBC
BBC APPLICATION 15/02682/MAR NUMBER CBC APPLICATION CB/15/04294/RM NUMBER LOCATION Wixams Land at former storage depot, Bedford Road, Wilstead Bedfordshire PROPOSAL Reserved Matters Application for Strategic
More informationLongbridge East : Site Wide and Phase One Development
Longbridge East : Site Wide and Phase One Development Non-Technical Summary of the August 2011 Introduction St Modwen Developments Ltd intend to submit a new outline planning application for Longbridge
More informationM4 Corridor around Newport Environmental Statement Volume 3: Appendices
Environmental Statement Volume 3: Appendices Environmental Statement Volume 3: Appendices At Issue March 2016 CVJV/AAR 3 rd Floor Longross Court, 47 Newport Road, Cardiff CF24 0AD Volume 3: Contents 1
More informationLand at Fiddington Hill Nursery, Market Lavington
Land at Fiddington Hill Nursery, Market Lavington Briefing Report for Market Lavington Parish Council Persimmon Homes (Wessex) April 2016 Background This brief report has been prepared following the Market
More informationGreat Easton Sustainable Housing Development Sites - Site Seven, Broadgate extension site SHLAA Ref HSG/03)
Great Easton Sustainable Housing Development Sites - Site Seven, Broadgate extension site SHLAA Ref HSG/03) 1. Introduction The Great Easton Neighbourhood Plan Group are preparing a Neighbourhood Plan
More information1 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:
Location 59 Greenway Close London N20 8ES Reference: 16/00011/HSE Received: 30th December 2015 Accepted: 7th January 2016 Ward: Totteridge Expiry 3rd March 2016 Applicant: Mr Ankit Shah Proposal: Part
More information3.1 The hybrid planning application proposes the following description of development:
CHAPTER 3: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3.1 The hybrid planning application proposes the following description of development: Hybrid (part-outline/part-full) planning application for a single composite development
More informationWelcome to our exhibition
Welcome to our exhibition housing development A46 Wildmoor Alcester Road Canal Quarter A422 Town Centre housing development Warwickshire-based IM Properties, one of the UK s largest privately owned property
More informationNeighbourhood Planning Local Green Spaces
Neighbourhood Planning Local Green Spaces Introduction... 2 1. Why green space is important... 4 2. Neighbourhood plans and green space... 6 3. Evidence... 8 Statutory designations... 9 Green space audit...
More informationWELCOME. North East Haverhill. The Planning Process
WELCOME North East The site to the North East of, known as Great Wilsey Park, is identified by St Edmundsbury Borough Council in its Core Strategy as capable of delivering a Sustainable Urban Extension.
More information11/04/2016. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128
Good practice in the preparation and understanding of NPPF-compliant heritage assessments/statements Stephen Bond, Heritage Places 1 NPPF Paragraphs 133-135 133: Where a proposed development will lead
More information