Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative Revised Proposals. Properties
|
|
- Brandon Reynolds
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
2 View 46 Charleville Road, Summer Visible Plots Existing Existing: Proposed illustrative Masterplan Revised Proposals: Significance of Potential Impact: The strong perspective to the view is softened by the street trees. The foliage draw s the observer s eye forward to the western end of the street. Existing street trees will partially screen the Proposed Development in summer and draw the focus of the view towards the western end of the street reducing the impact of the illustrative Masterplan in the view. Proposed illustrative Masterplan: minor, beneficial Viewing Position Camera Position The articulation of the roofline to buildings on plot BW01 has been amended however the difference in impact between the Original Scheme and the Revised Proposals is negligible. Cumulative Impact: Position Data No change National Grid Reference Camera height E N. 6.28m AOD. Camera heading Lens 24mm. Field of view 74. Date 18/04/2011. Time 15: Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
3 Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative - Original Scheme Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
4 View 47 Comeragh Road from the junction with Palliser Road Visible Plots Existing Viewing Position Position Data National Grid Reference Camera height E N. 6.24m AOD. Camera heading Lens 24mm. Field of view 74. Date 23/03/2011. Time 17:26 Camera Position Existing: The view is from Paliser Road looking down Comeragh Road in the Barons Court Conservation Area towards the northern end of the Site. The entrance to The Queen s Club is to the right out of view. The street is lined on both sides with red brick, late Victorian Flemish style terraces probably built between A post war infill block replacing bomb damaged terraces is visible on the right hand side of the street. Gables and chimneys articulate the roof line. Further to the east are earlier, stock brick terraces with stucco ornamentation and paired pillared porticos in the grand Italianate style typical of developments to the east of the Site. The Italianate terrace to the east of the junction with Gledstanes road on the left hand side of the street is locally listed. There is strong enclosure to the street, which channels the view. Consistent roof heights create a strong perspectival quality to the view only broken on the left by the entrance to a mews and the taller corner building, a pub, on the junction with Vereker Road. Visible at the far end of the view are trees on the junction with Vereker Road and on the eastern side of Challoner Street, a late 20th century, 3-storey extension to the locally listed bomb damaged West Kensington Congregational Church (now the Indian Institute of Culture) which is to the south out of view. Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals: Plots at the northern end of the Site, NE02 (blue), BW01 (red) and fronting West Cromwell Road, WK02 and WK03 (red) will be visible behind buildings on Challoner Street, with lower blocks immediately east of the conservation area and stepping up in height towards the centre of the site and towards Cromwell Road to the north. The Proposed Development will not appear above the roofline of the terraces lining Comeragh Road. Plots NE02 and BW01 at the northern end of the Broadway will form the high point of the Proposed Development in this view but will remain lower than the parapet line of the terrace in the middle ground. The Proposed Development will generate a layered, well-articulated composition of buildings which will enhance the legibility of the Opportunity Area from the east while preserving the strong perspective of the existing channeled view. At some distance from the viewing position within the highly layered composition, the Proposed Development will appear as a recessive urban backdrop to the conservation area and will not harm its setting. The difference in impact between the Original Scheme and the Revised Proposals is negligible. Proposed illustrative Masterplan Revised Proposals: The blocks within plots NE02 (blue), BW01 (red) and the buildings within West Kensington Village (red) will be visible behind buildings on Challoner Street, stepping up in height from 4-5 storeys behind North End Road to 8-12-storeys further from the viewing position, in the centre of the site and fronting West Cromwell Road to the left of the view. The 15-storey feature building within plot NE02 (blue) and the 16-storey feature building within plot BW01 (red) articulate the northern end of the Broadway and, form the high point of the Proposed Development with the potential to become distinctive orientation points for the new development. The illustrative view demonstrates the impact of the limitation on developable area within the parameter envelope set out in the Design Guidelines. Although visible above the existing roof line on North End Road, its mass within the parameter envelope will be limited by the constraints of the Design Guidelines and the overall visible mass of the illustrative Masterplan will reduce in comparison to the parameter envelope. The height of the energy centre chimney has been lowered in the Revised Proposals and is less prominent in the view. This will slightly reduce the magnitude of the impact of the Revised Proposals on the view. Cumulative Impact: No change Significance of Potential Impact: Proposed parameter envelope: minor, beneficial Proposed illustrative Masterplan: minor, beneficial 260 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
5 Proposed Parameter Envelope - June 2011 Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
6 View 47 Comeragh Road from the junction with Palliser Road Proposed Parameter Envelope Cumulative Revised Proposals 262 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
7 Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
8 View 48 Barons Court Road Visible Plots Existing Existing: Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals: Significance of Potential Impact: Viewing Position Position Data National Grid Reference Camera height Camera Position E N. 6.28m AOD. The view is from half way along Barons Court Road. In the centre of the view is the locally listed stucco entrance arch to Comeragh Mews. To its right is a large mature tree on the junction with Barton Road. Behind it, partially concealed by the foliage, are three-storey, stock brick Italianate terraces, which are locally listed. On the left of the view are short sections of terrace either side of the junction with Vereker Road; the easterly block is locally listed. On the left hand edge of the view, on the narrow tapering site between Barons Court Road and Comeragh Road, is the rear elevation of terraces on Comeragh Road partially obscured by planting in their private gardens on Barons Court Road. The view is channeled towards the left of the view by the attractive informal placement of buildings enclosing the southern edge of the street. A pair of party walls is visible above the parapet line of the terrace but no modern development is visible above the roof line which is viewed against open sky. The top of plots BW02 (blue) BW03 (yellow) will be just visible above the rear elevation of Comeragh Road. However, this protrusion will be very minor even in the parameter view, and the visible elements will be visually assimilated into the articulated roofline of gables and roof extensions as part of the layered urban backdrop. The impact on the view will be very limited. There is no difference in impact between the Original Scheme and the Revised Proposals. Proposed illustrative Masterplan Revised Proposals: The top of the illustrative Masterplan will be only just visible above the roof line and its impact will not be discernable. In the Revised Proposals visible mass of the illustrative Masterplan is reduced but this design refinement will not alter the significance of its impact. Proposed parameter envelope: negligible Proposed illustrative Masterplan: negligible Camera heading Cumulative Impact: Lens 24mm. No change Field of view 74. Date 28/03/2011. Time 17: Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
9 Proposed Parameter Envelope - June 2011 Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
10 View 48 Barons Court Road Proposed Parameter Envelope Cumulative Revised Proposals 266 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
11 Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
12 View 49 Hammersmith Cemetery Visible Plots Existing Existing: Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals: Significance of Potential Impact: Viewing Position Position Data Camera Position The view is from the central path in the west of Hammersmith Cemetery, formerly Margravine Cemetery, which was opened in The cemetery, within the Barons Court Conservation Area, is enclosed to the east by the backs of 2 to 4-storey terraces on Palliser Road but the mature planting throughout the cemetery largely screens views of its surroundings to the east. A distant Empress State building is just visible through the trees in winter right of centre in the view and completely obscured by dense foliage in summer. It does not harm the setting of the cemetery. To the west, behind the viewing position, the Charing Cross Hospital looms over the cemetery s open space. The proposed plots BW04 (pink) and NE06 (green) will be just visible, glimpsed through the trees on the right of the view. The Proposed Development will be seen in relation to The Empress State building as part of a distant urban backdrop to the Cemetery. The visibility of the new buildings will be heavily screened by the existing mature trees, and will be barely discernable to the casual observer, even in winter. In summer the new buildings will be completely concealed by the foliage in the cemetery. The Proposed Development will have little impact and will not harm the setting of the cemetery. The difference in impact between the Original Scheme and the Revised Proposals is negligible. Proposed parameter envelope: negligible Proposed illustrative Masterplan: negligible National Grid Reference E N. Proposed illustrative Masterplan Revised Proposals: Camera height 6.24m AOD. Camera heading Lens 24mm. Field of view 74. Date 24/03/2011. Time 17:13 The top of the South Tower may be glimpsed through the trees, in front of the existing Empress State Building. The difference in impact between the Original Scheme and the Revised Proposals is negligible. Cumulative Impact: No change 268 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
13 Proposed Parameter Envelope - June 2011 Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
14 View 49 Hammersmith Cemetery Proposed Parameter Envelope Cumulative Revised Proposals 270 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
15 Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
16 View 50 Talgarth Road (Gliddon Road) Visible Plots Existing Viewing Position Position Data National Grid Reference Camera height E N. 6.02m AOD. Camera heading Lens 24mm. Field of view 74. Date 23/03/2011. Time 17:50 Camera Position Existing: The view looks eastwards along the eight lanes of Talgarth Road with a planted verge and pavement on the left of the view. The viewing position is within the Gunter Estate Conservation Area which extends to the south of Talgarth Road and includes the long 3-storey terrace Talgarth Road, with ground floor bay windows, and prominent chimney stacks articulating the roof line, visible on the right of the view. In the centre of the view at the end of the long terrace are buildings at the junction with North End Road within the Barons Court Conservation Area, including the four-storey Three Kings public house in red brick, which is locally listed as a Building of Merit. Behind it is the taller form of Ashfield House in beige cladding with a chamfered roof profile, which is within the Site. Planting along the northern boundary of the Site is also visible at the far end of the view. The red brick residential block West Kensington Court dating from the early 20th century, outside the conservation area, is just visible above the planting on the left hand side of the view. To the right, out of view, are the Grade II listed St Paul s Studios. Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals: Ashfield House will be removed. Blocks at the northern end of the Site, in plots WK01 (blue) and WK02, WK03 and WK04 (red), fronting West Cromwell Road, will be visible forming a strong new frontage to the south side of the road. Plot BW01 (red), at the northern end of the Broadway will be seen to the right. The Proposed Development will provide much improved continuity and enclosure to this section of West Cromwell Road. It will be seen as a metropolitan front door to London for those arriving from the west, and the scale and visual prominence of the development in relation to the existing buildings in this view is therefore entirely appropriate. Tall development around the Empress State Building will not be visible above the roofline of the existing terrace on the left of the view. In the Revised Proposals the height of plot WK01 is reduced and the plot will step down in height at its western end where it adjoins the Building of Merit. The relationship with the adjacent building is enhanced but this design refinement will not alter the significance of the Revised Proposals impact. Proposed illustrative Masterplan Revised Proposals: West Kensington Village fronting West Cromwell Road, will be visible forming a strong new frontage to the south side of the road. The chimney to the energy centre in plot BW01 will be visible to the right. Reflective materials will be avoided and there will not be a visible plume of exhaust gases from the chimney; it will not therefore appear overly prominent in the articulated townscape of the view.the illustrative view demonstrates the impact of the limitation on developable area within the parameter envelope set out in the Design Guidelines; the overall visible mass of the illustrative Masterplan will reduce in comparison to the parameter envelope. The illustrative Masterplan will not present a relentless wall of development. Well articulated buildings will provide definition and continuity to the street frontage and contribute to a distinctive landmark identity for Earls Court development. In the Revised Proposals the height of plot WK01 is reduced and the plot will step down in height at its western end where it adjoins the Building of Merit. The relationship with the adjacent building is enhanced The height of the energy centre chimney has been lowered in the Revised Proposals and is less prominent in the view. These design refinements will not alter the significance of the Revised Proposals impact. Cumulative Impact: No change Significance of Potential Impact: Proposed parameter envelope: major, beneficial Proposed illustrative Masterplan: major, beneficial 272 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
17 Proposed Parameter Envelope - June 2011 Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
18 View 50 Talgarth Road (Gliddon Road) Proposed Parameter Envelope Cumulative Revised Proposals 274 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
19 Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
20 View 51 Talgarth Road (North End Road) Visible Plots Existing Viewing Position Position Data National Grid Reference Camera height E N. 6.36m AOD. Camera heading Camera Position Existing: The view looks eastwards along Talgarth Road, across four lanes of eastbound traffic with a grass verge and pavement on the left of the view. The viewing position is within the Gunter Estate Conservation Area looking towards the junction with North End Road. On the southern side of Talgarth Road, within the Barons Court Conservation Area, is 62 North End Road, its height stepping down on the right hand edge of the view. To its left the four-storey, late 19th century Three Kings public house in red brick, which is locally listed as a Building of Merit. In the centre of the view is the taller form of Ashfield House in beige cladding with a champhered roof profile, which is within the Site. Planting along the northern boundary of the Site and the advertising hoardings of the Clear Channel site are also visible at the far end of the view. The rear of 70 North End Road within the Gunter Estate Conservation Area and West Kensington Court dating from the early 20th century, outside the conservation area, are just visible behind trees on the left hand side of the view. Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals: Ashfield House will be removed. Blocks at the northern end of the Site, in plots WK01 (blue) and WK02, WK03 and WK04 (red), fronting West Cromwell Road, will be visible forming a strong and well articulated new street frontage to the south side of the road. The Proposed Development will provide much improved continuity and enclosure to this section of West Cromwell Road. It will be seen as a metropolitan front door to London for those arriving from the west, and the scale and visual prominence of the development in relation to the existing buildings in this view is therefore entirely appropriate. However the maximum height of the Proposed Development will not exceed that of West Kensington Court in this view. In the Revised Proposals the height of plot WK01 is reduced overall and the plot will step down more in height at its western end where it adjoins the Three Kings pub. The relationship with the adjacent Building of Merit is enhanced but this design refinement will not alter the significance of the Revised Proposals impact. Proposed illustrative Masterplan Revised Proposals: parameter envelope. The illustrative Masterplan will not present a relentless wall of development. Well articulated buildings will provide definition and continuity to the street frontage and contribute to a distinctive landmark identity for Earls Court development. In the Revised Proposals the height of plot WK01 is reduced and the plot will step down in height at its western end where it adjoins the Building of Merit. The relationship with the adjacent building is enhanced but this design refinement will not alter the significance of the Revised Proposals impact. Cumulative Impact: No change Significance of Potential Impact: Proposed parameter envelope: major, beneficial Proposed illustrative Masterplan: major, beneficial Lens 24mm. Field of view 74. Date 23/03/2011. Time 17:58 West Kensington Village fronting West Cromwell Road, will be visible forming a strong new frontage to the south side of the road. The illustrative view demonstrates the impact of the limitation on developable area within the parameter envelope set out in the Design Guidelines; the overall visible mass of the illustrative Masterplan will reduce in comparison to the 276 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
21 Proposed Parameter Envelope - June 2011 Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
22 View 51 Talgarth Road (North End Road) Proposed Parameter Envelope Cumulative Revised Proposals 278 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
23 Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
24 View 52 Gunterstone Road, Winter Visible Plots Existing Existing: Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals: Proposed illustrative Masterplan Revised Proposals: Viewing Position Position Data National Grid Reference Camera height Camera Position E N. 6.61m AOD. The view is taken from the western end of the street close to the junction with Gliddon Road, within the Gunter Estate Conservation Area. Visible on the left and right hand edges are late 19th century mansion blocks 1-4 and 5-9 Gliddon Road, which are both locally listed as Buildings of Merit. Beyond them, lining Gunterstone Road, are three-storey terraces in red brick dating from around the turn of the 20th century. The houses are similar but vary in detail between the north and south terraces. East of the junction with Glazbury Road, the earlier stock brick gabled terraces, although not clearly visible through the street trees, are taller and grander. There is strong enclosure to the street, which channels the view and the consistent roof heights create a pronounced perspectival quality. At the end of the view outside the conservation area is the undistinguished elevation of West Kensington Court onto North End Road stepping up from 4 to 7 storeys. Plots WK02 and WK03 (red) at the northern end of the Site will be visible at the end of the street beyond West Kensington Court. The height of the blocks will not be exceed the roof line of the existing terraces in the foreground and will not dominate the buildings within the conservation area. The Proposed Development will not appear above the roofline of the terraces lining Gunterstone Road. The Proposed Development will generate a layered, well-articulated composition of buildings, which will mitigate the impact of West Kensington Court by integrating it with a richer urban backdrop and enhance the legibility of the Opportunity Area from the east while preserving the strong perspective of the existing channeled view. At some distance from the viewing position within the layered composition, the Proposed Development will appear as a recessive urban backdrop to the conservation area and will not harm its setting. The difference in impact between the Original Scheme and the Revised Proposals is negligible. The blocks within plots WK02 and WK03 (red) in West Kensington Village will be visible at the end of the street. The illustrative view demonstrates the impact of the limitation on developable area within the parameter envelope set out in the Design Guidelines; the overall visible mass of the illustrative Masterplan will reduce in comparison to the parameter envelope. The difference in impact between the Original Scheme and the Revised Proposals is negligible. Cumulative Impact: No change Significance of Potential Impact: Proposed parameter envelope: minor, beneficial Camera heading Proposed illustrative Masterplan: minor, beneficial Lens 24mm. Field of view 74. Date 24/03/2011. Time 17: Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
25 Proposed Parameter Envelope - June 2011 Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
26 View 52 Gunterstone Road, Winter Proposed Parameter Envelope Cumulative Revised Proposals 282 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
27 Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
28 View 52 Gunterstone Road, Summer Visible Plots Existing Existing: Proposed illustrative Masterplan Revised Proposals: Significance of Potential Impact: Street trees draw the observer s eye forward, screening the far end of the street. The street trees partly screen the Proposed Development beyond the conservation area, reducing its impact. Proposed illustrative Masterplan: negligible The difference in impact between the Original Scheme and the Revised Proposals is negligible. Viewing Position Camera Position Cumulative Impact: No change Position Data National Grid Reference Camera height E N. 6.61m AOD. Camera heading Lens 24mm. Field of view 74. Date 18/04/2011. Time 16: Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
29 Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative - Original Scheme Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
30 View 53 North End Road from the junction with Fitzjames Avenue Visible Plots Existing Viewing Position Position Data National Grid Reference Camera Position E N. Existing: The view looks south towards the Site along North End Road from the junction with Fitzjames Avenue, and is taken just inside the Fitzgeorge and Fitzjames Conservation Area. The three substantial interlinked blocks of North End House in red brick with stucco bases and top storeys, which are within the conservation area, are on the right of the view. North End House, with North End Parade, a parade of small shop units within the ground floor, were built on the site of the demolished North End House in The blocks were designed by Joseph Architects. On the left is the post-war Lytton Estate, which is outside the conservation area. In the centre at the far end of the view is a locally listed Victorian former pub on the junction of North End Road and North End Crescent which is within the Gunter Estate Conservation Area. The substantial buildings in the views foreground channel the view to the south where the top of the Empress State Building is visible behind the former Fox public house and hotel, significantly lower than North End House, which dominates this view. Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals: Plots WK01 (blue) and WK02 and WK03 (red) with plots NE02, BW02 (blue), BW01 (red) and BW04 (pink/blue) behind them visible in front of the Empress State Building and partly obscuring it in the view. The southern end of North End House remains visible against open sky maintaining the un-obscured silhouette of the three pavilions. The Proposed Development will create a layered and well articulated urban skyline visible beyond the conservation area which will appear recessive and subservient to the buildings within the conservation area, whose setting will not be harmed. In the Revised Proposals the top of plot BW04 will appear as a slimmer form, revealing more of the existing Empress State Building behind it, enhancing the layered quality of the townscape. The overall visibility of the Revised Proposals is slightly reduced. However, this design refinement does not alter the significance of the Revised Proposals impact. the existing buildings in the view. The illustrative Masterplan will mitigate the impact of the Empress State Building as a single focus to the view by integrating it within a layered recessive urban backdrop to the view. The height of the energy centre chimney has been lowered in the Revised Proposals and is less prominent in the view. The top of the North Tower will appear as a slimmer, articulated rectilinear form that will complement rather than contrast with the existing buildings in the view. However these design refinements will not alter the significance of the Revised Proposals impact. Cumulative Impact: No change Significance of Potential Impact: Proposed parameter envelope: moderate, beneficial Camera height 6.82m AOD. Camera heading Proposed illustrative Masterplan Revised Proposals: Proposed illustrative Masterplan: moderate, beneficial Lens 24mm. Field of view 74. Date 25/03/2011. Time 14:02 The illustrative view demonstrates the impact of the limitation on developable area within the parameter envelope, and the benefits of articulation of the massing and tops of the towers set out in the Design Guidelines; the overall visible mass of the illustrative Masterplan will reduce in comparison to the parameter envelope. Through its form, articulation and materiality, the top of the North Tower will complement the Empress State Building and 286 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
31 Proposed Parameter Envelope - June 2011 Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
32 View 53 North End Road from the junction with Fitzjames Avenue Proposed Parameter Envelope Cumulative Revised Proposals 288 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
33 Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
34 View 54 Avonmore Road Visible Plots Existing Viewing Position Position Data National Grid Reference Camera height E N. 7.55m AOD. Camera heading Lens 24mm. Field of view 74. Date 02/03/2011. Time 17:43 Camera Position Existing: The view looks south from the northern end of Avonmore Road within the Olympia and Avonmore Conservation Area. On the left and right of the view are five-storey late 19th century mansion blocks. In the centre of the view, framed by the closer blocks, is the red brick Lisgar Terrace Estate constructed by the Samuel Lewis Trust visible through trees on Earsby Street and Lisgar Terrace. Its roof line is articulated by tall chimney stacks. It is outside the conservation area. To its right is a four storey Victorian terrace on Avonmore Road, which is within the conservation area. Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals: The tops of plots NE06 (green) and BW04 (pink) will be just visible above the roof tops on the left hand side of Avonmore Road. Also visible will be the top of plot WK02 lining West Cromwell Road and on the left plot BW01. The projections of the Proposed Development will be assimilated within the articulated distant skyline of stepping roofs and chimney stacks, with a limited impact on the view and no loss of quality. In the Revised Proposals the tops of plots NE06 and BW04 will appear as a slimmer forms. However, this design refinement will not alter the significance of the Revised Proposals impact. Proposed illustrative Masterplan Revised Proposals: The tops of the 27-storey (maximum) South Tower (green) and North Tower (pink) will be just visible above the roof tops on the left hand side of Avonmore Road. Also visible are the tops of West Kensington Village (red). The chimney to the energy centre in plot BW01 will be visible to the right of the left hand terrace. Reflective materials will be avoided and there will not be a visible plume of exhaust gases from the chimney; it will not therefore appear overly prominent in the articulated townscape of the view. The illustrative view demonstrates the impact of the limitation on developable area within the parameter envelope and the benefits of articulation of the massing and tops of the towers set out in the Design Guidelines, here resulting in a reduction in the visible mass of the buildings in the view. The height of the energy centre chimney has been lowered in the Revised Proposals and is less prominent in the view. The tops of the North and South Towers will appear as slimmer, rectilinear forms that will complement rather than contrast with the existing roofline. However these design refinements will not alter the significance of the Revised Proposals impact. Cumulative Impact: No change Significance of Potential Impact: Proposed parameter envelope: negligible Proposed illustrative Masterplan: negligible 290 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
35 Proposed Parameter Envelope - June 2011 Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
36 View 54 Avonmore Road Proposed Parameter Envelope Cumulative Revised Proposals 292 Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
37 Proposed Illustrative Masterplan Cumulative Revised Proposals Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December
38 View 55 Barons Court Road east Visible Plots Existing Existing: Proposed parameter envelope Revised Proposals: Proposed illustrative Masterplan Revised Proposals: Viewing Position Position Data National Grid Reference Camera Position E N. The view looks eastwards along Barons Court Road towards North End Road, on the edge of the Barons Court Conservation Area. On the right hand side are four storey blocks with shops at ground floor to the southern edge of the street. Two of the blocks date from the late 19th century and the central block is a post-war infill block. On the left of the view the boundary wall to the railway cutting is visible behind mature London plane trees and beyond it the back of North End Road. In the centre of the view is North End Road, a one and two storey block with shops at ground floor, which is included within the Application Site. It is in the Barons Court Conservation Area but does not make a positive visual contribution to the conservation area. Just visible through the trees to its left are West Kensington Station and the Three Kings pub, which are both locally listed as Buildings of Merit North End Road, which does not make a positive visual contribution to the conservation area, will be replaced by plot WK01 (blue) on North End Road. The scale of the new block will be appropriate to the scale of the conservation area along North End Road, the height of the new buildings will relate well to the height of existing buildings at the eastern end of Barons Court Road. Plots WK02 and WK03 (red) will be visible behind North End Road creating a layered townscape of buildings beyond, within the Application Site to the east. Much of the development will be screened by the trees in this spring view. The Proposed Development will not harm the conservation area and the quality of the view will be maintained. The difference in impact between the Original Scheme and the Revised Proposals is negligible North End Road, which does not make a positive visual contribution to the conservation area, will be replaced by a building of five storeys within block WK01 on North End Road. The scale of the new block will be appropriate to the scale of the conservation area along North End Road, the height of the new buildings relates well to the height of existing buildings at the eastern end of Barons Court Road. Buildings of up to 12 storeys will be visible beyond but set well back within the application Site. The illustrative view demonstrates the impact of the limitation on developable area within the parameter envelope set out in the Design Guidelines, here resulting in a reduction in the visible mass of the buildings visible beyond the frontage on to North End Road in the view in comparison to the maximum parameter. The difference in impact between the Original Scheme and the Revised Proposals is negligible. Camera height 6.52m AOD. Cumulative Impact: Camera heading No change Lens 24 mm. Significance of Potential Impact: Field of view 74. Date 11/05/15. Proposed parameter envelope: moderate, beneficial Proposed illustrative Masterplan: moderate, beneficial Time 14: Earls Court Project Application 2 Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Environmental Statement, Volume II - Site Wide Development Option - Addendum Part 2 December 2011
3.1: The Masterplan Proposals
.: The Masterplan Proposals Retail School..0. The majority of the retail units are focused along the vibrant High Street and the existing North End Road and Lillie Road...0. There are also retail units
More information1.2: Worked Example: Plot WV04 (North East)
1.2: Worked Example: Plot WV04 (North East) Appearance: Tri-partite Elevations Guideline 4.1.26: Tri-partite Design There is...a unifying principles across all elevations which is a tri-partite division.
More informationConservation Area Designation, amendments and Review
Conservation Area Designation, amendments and Review Location: No.s 37-49 (odd) Twickenham Road Date Assessed: January 2018 Adjacent Conservation Area Significance: Teddington Lock CA. The Teddington Lock
More informationedge of gas line corridor setback edge of gas line corridor aligned with Schlumberger building 37.0 m AOD 33.0 m AOD max
7. Heights and Street Frontage: In accordance with the approved heights parameters, heights to along Western Access Road must respond to the existing low density character in this location. Heights are
More informationTall Buildings Strategy
Chapter 8 Tall Building Strategy Mayor of London 115 existing & consented tall buildings effect on views of palace of westminster Chapter 8 Tall Buildings Strategy tall building cluster upto 150m with
More information5. Bankside and The Borough 5.1. Bankside and The Borough Area Vision
5. 5.1. Area Vision 5.1.1. are: A globally significant central London business district which is home to international business headquarters; At the heart of the commercial and cultural life of the capital
More informationStoke Newington High Street 1.0 Site Analysis
1.0 Site Analysis 9-11 Stoke Newington Church Street Grade II Existing Entrance via Wilmer Place Stoke Newington Church Street 187-191, 18th C; Grade II* including forecourt wall, railings and gates Rights
More informationGarden Bridge Planning Application
Planning Application Additional Verified photomontages and assessment September 2014 Contents Page 1 Visual assessment 2 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 Baseline 2 1.3 Potential effects and good environmental
More informationMorgan s Subdivision Historic District Character-defining Features
Morgan s Subdivision Historic District Character-defining Features DISTRICT DESCRIPTION This small addition, designed as a neighborhood for those wishing to move east from Capitol Hill, was predominantly
More informationLancaster Conservation Area Appraisal. Character Area 8. Cathedral
Lancaster Conservation Area Appraisal Character Area 8. Cathedral March 2013 118 3.8 Character Area 8. Cathedral 3.8.1. Definition of Special Interest "This character area is distinctive for the fine group
More informationPART 05 VISUAL SETTING
PART 05 VISUAL SETTING 5.1 How to use the Visual Settings 5.2 Views from the Headland 5.3 Creek Foreshore Park Looking North 5.4 Bridge looking North 5.5 Bridge looking West 5.6 Bridge looking South 5.7
More information2.11 PARAPETS AND CORNICES
2.11 PARAPETS AND CORNICES Parapets and cornices mark the transition between buildings and the sky; they cap the building and conceal the roof. Parapets often extend well above the roof to create an illusion
More informationCommenting on Planning Applications: MHPRA Policy
Commenting on Planning Applications: MHPRA Policy millhillparkacton.org Our Area The Mill Hill Park Residents Association covers the Mill Hill Park Conservation Area in Acton, W3. Objectives We aim to
More informationList of Buildings of Local Architectural or Historic Interest BUCKHURST HILL PARISH
List of Buildings of Local Architectural or Historic Interest BUCKHURST HILL PARISH 1. ST. STEPHEN'S CHURCH Albert Road /Buckhurst Way Attractive, albeit modest, late 19th century church (date stone 1876)
More informationUrban Design Assessment
3 Urban Design Assessment Page 27 3:1. Urban form Figure Ground The plan to the left is a 'figure ground' plan of the Southall area. This shows that Southall is a distinct place, surrounded by open land
More informationEuston Area Plan. Background Report Appendix 3. Proposed modifications (shown as tracked changes)
Euston Area Plan Background Report Proposed modifications (shown as tracked changes) September 2014 . Testing the impacts of tall buildings on strategic and local views Introduction This appendix provides
More informationCOURTHOUSE CAMPUS BARNSLEY Executive Summary March 2010
COURTHOUSE CAMPUS BARNSLEY Executive Summary March 2010 Estell Warren Cartwright Pickard Buro Happold King Sturge BWA Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council introduction Courthouse Campus is the last major
More informationArtists impression of the Park Promenade and plot H4 with café and restaurant uses that is still subject to change
The Park Promenade Artists impression of how a café might look Artists impression of the Park Promenade and plot H4 with café and restaurant uses that is still subject to change Precedent images for balconies
More informationConservation Area Designation, amendments and Review
Conservation Area Designation, amendments and Review Location: Any area largely confined to Park Road and St. James Avenue which includes the following properties: St. James Church, St. James Road; No.
More informationtaken from publically accessible locations within the been considered in this appraisal. These have been
Visual Receptors 3.64 Visual receptors are people within the surrounding area whose views or visual amenity would be effected by the development proposals. 3.65 Visual receptors that will be most sensitive
More informationCharacter Area 1: Town Core
Character Area 1: Town Core Map S 354 Copyright Cotswold District Council 109 Character Area 1: Town Core Key Characteristics 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 Copyright Cotswold
More informationLincoln Townscape Assessment. Boultham Park Inherited Character Area Statement
Lincoln Townscape Assessment Boultham Park Inherited Character Area Statement January 2008 Page 2 of 12 Table of Contents Page Overview 2 Historical Development 2 Urban form 3 Views 5 Condition of Buildings
More informationUPPER GORDON ROAD TO CHURCH HILL, CAMBERLEY CONSERVATION AREA
Introduction This leaflet explains the purpose of conservation areas and the implication of their designation for residents, property owners and the Council. It provides you with a plan of the area and
More information4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon
4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre 4.0 Design Guidelines for the Village Centre The Village Centre is the focal point of the entire South Fields Community and is designed as a traditional commercial
More informationExploring Abergavenny
11 Majors Barn36 Ysguborwen Exploring Abergavenny 2 ysguborwen EXPLORING ABERGAVENNY For several years the Abergavenny and District Civic Society has been studying the streets, spaces and buildings of
More informationWide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials
Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property incompatible fencing materials garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park Lack of plantings as a buffer between private property and open
More informationWELLINGTON HOSPITAL DESIGN GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS
WELLINGTON HOSPITAL DESIGN GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction Page 2 The Place of Wellington Hospital 2 The Future of the Hospital 2 2.0 The Intention of the Design Guide 3 3.0 Analysis 4 General
More informationCHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses
CHAPTER 3 Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Section Number Title Ordinance Number Date of Ordinance 16-3-1 Applicability 2006-11 2008-04 07-01-08 16-3-2 Uniform Standards for Architectural Design
More informationFriends Meeting House, Broughton. Meeting House Lane, Little Broughton, Cockermouth, CA13 0YQ. National Grid Reference: NY
Friends Meeting House, Broughton Meeting House Lane, Little Broughton, Cockermouth, CA13 0YQ National Grid Reference: NY 07832 31740 Statement of Significance The modest building has medium significance
More informationCOMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION
COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION INTRODUCTION These guidelines were prepared in response to the needs of many users: developers, property owners, architects,
More informationProposals for a new college and homes. Thank you for visiting our exhibition.
1 Welcome Thank you for visiting our exhibition. The college are pleased to welcome you to view our plans to regenerate. If you have any questions, please feel free to speak with a member of the project
More informationConservation Area Designation, amendments and Review
Conservation Area Designation, amendments and Review Location: Are area largely confined to Cowley Road and North Warpole Way and incorporating the following properties: No.s 2-120 (even) & 61 123 (odd)
More informationThe Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program. City of Anaheim. Adopted September 1994 (94R-239)
Public Realm Landscape Program City of Anaheim Adopted September 1994 (94R-239) Amendment No. 1 October 1996 (96R-178) Amendment No. 2 June 1999 (99R-137) Amendment No. 3 February 2001 (2002R-56) Amendment
More informationMemo. B R A Y H e r i t a g e
6 1 3. 5 4 2. 3 3 9 3 6 1 3. 5 4 9. 6 2 3 1 c a r l @ b r a y h e r i t a g e. c o m Memo To: Jennifer Murray, Windmill Development Corporation From: Carl Bray, Bray Heritage Date: Monday, June 5, 2017
More informationILLUSTRATIVE MASTERPLAN
ILLUSTRATIVE MASTERPLAN The Development Dairy Crest (Imperial College) The Proposed Development aims to create a new high quality residential neighbourhood, alongside a new public park for White City.
More information7.1 Area 1: Haslemere Conservation Area
7.1 Area 1: Haslemere Conservation Area Detailed map of Haslemere Town Conservation Area as of 2006 Crown copyright and database right 2011 Ordnance Survey LA100025451 27 The Conservation Area is characterised
More informationViewpoint 1. Location: View from Murch Road on the north eastern boundary of Application Site. Viewing south / southwest.
Application Site (eastern field) Former site of St. Cyres Lower School Murch Road 1 Location: View from Murch Road on the north eastern boundary of Application Site. Viewing south / southwest. Baseline
More informationLincoln Townscape Assessment. Sherbrooke Inherited Character Area Statement
Lincoln Townscape Assessment Sherbrooke Inherited Character Area Statement June 2008 Page 2 of 15 Table of Contents Page Overview 2 Historical Development 3 Urban form 4 Views 8 Condition of Buildings
More informationLongbridge Town Centre Phase 2 Planning Application
Longbridge Town Centre Phase 2 Planning Application Non-Technical Summary of the Environmental Statement December 2013 Introduction A full application for Planning Permission has been submitted to Birmingham
More informationOttawa Historic Resources Inventory: Commercial Historic District Building Information. Significance and Potential Eligibility
C 01 1 Address: address 1 PIN: 21 11 218 001 Plan: Rectangular Stories: 2 Original Owner: Roof Type: Flat Building Names: Marquette School Foundation: Important Dates: ca 1955 Walls: BRICK Architect /
More information24 Park Crescent. Exploring Abergavevnny
24 Park Crescent Exploring Abergavevnny Cover: Park Crescent and the Blorenge 2 park crescent EXPLORING ABERGAVENNY For several years the Abergavenny and District Civic Society has been studying the streets,
More informationKidbrooke Village Forthcoming Planning Proposals Phases 3, 5 and 6
July 2014 Kidbrooke Village Forthcoming Planning Proposals Phases 3, 5 and 6 Design Evolution and changes since our last consultation This document outlines how the feedback received from our last consultation
More information5 Gratton Terrace London NW2 6QE. Reference: 17/5094/HSE Received: 4th August 2017 Accepted: 7th August 2017 Ward: Childs Hill Expiry 2nd October 2017
Location 5 Gratton Terrace London NW2 6QE Reference: 17/5094/HSE Received: 4th August 2017 Accepted: 7th August 2017 Ward: Childs Hill Expiry 2nd October 2017 Applicant: WSD (Gratton) Ltd Proposal: The
More informationUrban Design Brief December 23, 2015 Southside Construction Group Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment
Urban Design Brief Proposed Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment 3244, 3263 and 3274 Wonderland Road South Southside Group December 23, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 1 SECTION 1 LAND
More informationUrban Design Guidelines Townhouse and Apartment Built Form
Urban Design Guidelines Townhouse and Apartment Built Form Town of Wasaga Beach Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Purpose 1.2. Urban Design Principles 1.3. Application of Guidelines 2. Site Design,
More informationAppraisal of proposed alterations to the boundary of Helmsley Conservation Area
Appraisal of proposed alterations to the boundary of Helmsley Conservation Area Elmslac Road: Elmslac Road was constructed in the early 1950s in two or three stages by the Helmsley Rural District Council.
More informationMVRC ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STATEMENT
11251 MOONEE VALLEY RACING CLUB MAY 201 CONTENTS 0 Contents Introduction 1 Site Analysis a. Site Features b. Built form Interfaces c. Existing Streetscape d. Site Opportunities and Constraints 2 Masterplan
More informationFRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project
FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project DEVELOPER: SIGNATURE PROPERTIES ARCHITECT: HKIT ARCHITECTS April 23, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Vision 4 Description of Site 5 Guiding Concepts 6
More information22.15 OUTDOOR ADVERTISING SIGNAGE POLICY
22.15 OUTDOOR ADVERTISING SIGNAGE POLICY This policy applies to all land where a planning permit is required to construct or display a sign under the provisions of the Kingston Planning Scheme. 22.15-1
More informationUrban Design Site Assessment
1150 Great North Road/8 Parr Road North, Point Chevalier Urban Design Site Assessment (8th February 2017) 1. Introduction and Overview 0B It is proposed to develop land at 1150/1158 Great North Road and
More informationOrdnance Street 110 Plan OS Lot 413 B202; parts of Lot 412 and portion of Lot 413
Ordnance Street 110 Plan OS Lot 413 B202; parts of Lot 412 and portion of Lot 413 110 Ordnance Street has cultural heritage value under 3 categories Physical built in 1886, it is an example of late 19
More informationEarls Court. Reserved Matters Application Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea. Design and Access Statement November 2013
Earls Court Reserved Matters Application Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Design and Access Statement November 2013 Prepared for EC Properties Ltd by Farrells, KPF, P&P and Arups Earls Court Reserved
More informationGREENFORD HALL & ADJOINING LAND
GREENFORD HALL & ADJOINING LAND CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1. Introduction 2. Urban Context 2.1 The Site and Surroundings 2.2 Urban Context Map 2.3 Access and Movement 3. Planning Context 3.1 Planning History
More informationContents. Annexes. Annex 1 Process Diagram for the discharge of the DCO Requirements. Annex 2 Design Sheet Power Generation Plant
Design Principles Document December 2014 Contents Summary... 2 Purpose of this Statement... 2 Design Parameters... 2 Guidance Documents... 3 Additional Design Considerations... 3 Public involvement and
More informationHousing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner
Housing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner Policy D.8: Encourage Compatible Housing Design Encourage housing design that is sensitive to existing single family housing neighbourhoods by requiring a design
More informationMATURE SUBURBS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
MATURE SUBURBS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES DRAFT FEBRUARY 2005 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL 1 Introduction Mature Suburbs Residential Development Guidelines - Interim Supplementary Planning Advice -
More informationIn which we undertake urban design analysis to further explore issues raised in the baseline assessment of the town.
02 In which we undertake urban design analysis to further explore issues raised in the baseline assessment of the town. DESIGN ANALYSIS 12 URBAN 13 1883 Plan 14 HISTORY Crewe was transformed in the 19th
More informationHuddersfield Urban Design Framework. 3. Framework
3. Framework The illustrative plan has been used as the basis for developing an urban design framework and strategy in Part 3 of this report. This is based on a series of regulatory plans that code the
More informationChapter 3: Office & Office Mixed-Use Project Types
Chapter Contents Purpose... 3-2 Applicability and Use Types...3-3 (1) Site Design...3-4 Building Placement and Orientation...3-5 Circulation and Vehicle Parking...3-6 Bicycle/Pedestrian Amenities...3-8
More information5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
Chapter 5: Aesthetic Resources 5.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter considers the potential of the Proposed Action to impact the visual character and aesthetic resources of the project area and the surrounding
More informationBaker Historic District
DISTRICT DESCRIPTION This is a historically middle-class neighborhood in the South Side, an area annexed by Denver in 1883, consisting of more than 20 tightly interwoven residential subdivisions. The earliest
More informationB. PROPOSED REFINEMENTS POTENTIALLY AFFECTING URBAN DESIGN AND VISUAL RESOURCES
Chapter 4: Urban Design and Visual Resources A. CONCLUSIONS OF THE FGEIS The FGEIS concluded that the Approved Plan will not result in any significant adverse impact on urban design or visual resources.
More informationTazewell Pike. Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Design Guidelines
Tazewell Pike Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Design Guidelines Knoxville Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission November 2, 2000 These design guidelines were: Adopted by the Knoxville
More informationDESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT
. DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT Site Adjacent to The Manor House, Upper Street,, Kingsdown, Deal, Kent. DESIGNS ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING CONTENTS Design and Access Statement Introduction Site and Location Planning
More informationThis image is an illustration of a similar scale scheme on a different site by Stitch
Stitch design approach Site 74 - MALTON HOUS This image is an illustration of a similar scale scheme on a different site by Stitch Stitch has been appointed as architect for six sites across the northern
More informationAPPENDIX MATAKANA COMMERCIAL URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
APPENDIX MATAKANA COMMERCIAL URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following urban design guidelines are to be utilised by landowners, planners and other persons involved in development at early
More informationBuilding and Site Design Standards
Commercial Design Standards All Business and Industrial Uses as Described in Section 2234 Requiring Special Permit Review Except Large-Scale Ground Mounted Solar Photovoltaic Installations and Wireless
More informationDemolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue
REPORT FOR ACTION Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property - 421 Roncesvalles Avenue Date: March 8, 2018 To: Toronto Preservation Board Toronto and East York Community Council From: Acting Chief Planner
More informationSCHEDULE 12 TO THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY GLEN WAVERLEY ACTIVITY CENTRE STRUCTURE PLAN
DD/MM/YY Proposed C120 SCHEDULE 12 TO THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY Shown on the planning scheme map as DDO12. GLEN WAVERLEY ACTIVITY CENTRE STRUCTURE PLAN 1.0 Design objectives DD/MM/YY Proposed
More informationVictorian Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
Victorian Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal. VCAT Ref: P1853/2017 REVIEW: Application to Review Conditions to Planning Permit PLN 16/0925 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Development of the land for construction
More informationGUIDELINES TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL LOCATION. INTRODUCTION Existing College Wing Buildings and Site Plan - Figure 1A and Figure 1B.
GENERAL HOSPITAL Development in the south-east quandrant of University Avenue and College Street will be consistent with the following urban design guidelines. LOCATION Lands owned by the Toronto General
More informationColchester Northern Gateway Master Plan Vision Review Draft. July 2016
Colchester Northern Gateway Master Plan Vision Review Draft July 2016 Contents Introduction 4 Context 8 Purpose of the Report 8 Strategic Position 9 Overview of the Process 11 2012 Master Plan Vision 12
More information/05 Architectural Response
/05 Architectural Response 5.1 Inspiration Stacked Boxes (Artist : Rachael Whiteread) Cubism ( Architect : Le Corbusier) 52 1133 Melville Rezoning Submission Patterns ( Textile Artist : Annie Albers) Overlapping
More informationINSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES
INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES INTRODUCTION Community institutions are an important part of the character and vitality of neighborhoods in Forsyth County. Institutional uses include
More informationDocklands SDZ: Views & Prospects Analysis. Dublin City Council Planning Department February 2013
Docklands SDZ: Views & Prospects Analysis Dublin City Council Planning Department February 2013 1.0 AIM OF STUDY The aim of the Views and Prospects study is to identify existing and potential views of
More informationCALA HO ME S WELCOME
WELCOME Welcome to this public consultation event for our proposed residential development of 56 high quality homes on land to the north east of Station Road in Earls Colne. Thank you for taking the time
More informationMOUNT VICTORIA NORTH CHARACTER AREA DESIGN GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS
MOUNT VICTORIA NORTH CHARACTER AREA DESIGN GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction and Locality Map Page 2 2.0 Intention of the Design Guide 3 3.0 Analysis 4 4.0 Objective 5 5.0 Guidelines 6 Volume 2
More information8. Camberwell 8.1. Camberwell Area Vision
8. 8.1. Area Vision 8.1.1. is: Centred on a medieval village centre which has become a thriving modern town centre surrounded by residential streets laid out in the Georgian era; Linked by rail to central
More informationDraft Part 11 Heritage Area Plans West Wallsend / Holmesville
TABLE OF CONTENTS: PART 1 WEST WALLSEND / HOLMESVILLE HERITAGE AREA PLAN... 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION... 3 1.2 BACKGROUND... 3 1.3 LAND TO WHICH THIS PLAN APPLIES... 3 PART 2 WEST WALLSEND / HOLMESVILLE HERITAGE
More informationOfficial Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4897, 2016 (Sewell s Landing)
District of West Vancouver Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4897, 2016 (Sewell s Landing) Effective Date: 1089612v1 District of West Vancouver Official Community Plan Bylaw
More informationEastern Golf Course, Doncaster Road, Doncaster
, 463-535 Road, Heritage Assessment in accordance with Schedule to the Development Plan Overlay July 2013 bryce raworth conservation urban design 19 Victoria Street St Kilda Vic 3182 , 463-535 Road, Heritage
More informationA1 Portrait: Pdf/print with bleed & slug
01 Hammersmith Campus Imperial West St Mary's Campus South Kensington Campus Charing Cross Campus Royal Brompton Campus Chelsea and Westminster Campus Existing Imperial College London campuses ABOUT IMPERIAL
More informationSETTLEMENT ASSESSMENT PROFORMA
SETTLEMENT ASSESSMENT PROFORMA Surveyors(s):Clare Sheridan Character Area: Park Estate = Midland Rd, Severn Rd, Festival Rd, Park Rd, Willow Rd, Rylands Rd. Date: Feb Weather: cloudy Look through all the
More informationST. LUKE'S. planning consent will not be given for residential uses of ground floor and basement premises currently in non-residential use;
CA SIXTEEN ST. LUKE'S 16.1 The Council will operate special policies in the St. Luke s Conservation Area in order to preserve and enhance the special character and appearance of the area. 16.2 Lying in
More informationWarren Farm, Ampthill
1 Welcome The developers of the Warren Farm site, Bloor Homes and Connolly Homes, are holding this exhibition on the emerging Design Codes for the development prior to their formal submission to Central
More informationCamberwell Camberwell Area Vision Map
Area Vision Map NSP23 Burgess Park Edmund Street NSP29 NSP30 NSP31 New Road Benhill Road NSP27 NSP33 Green Brunswick Park NSP22 station NSP24 Peckham Road NSP26 St Giles Church Lucas Gardens NSP28 NSP25
More informationMIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.
N MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C- FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER 04-00 Project No. 496 Issued Revised SCALE: " = 0' N 0 0 0 40 RZ. c GENERAL PROVISIONS: a. SITE LOCATION.
More informationBata Mews East Tilbury. Introduction
Introduction Thames Industrial Estates Ltd welcomes you to this community consultation event in respect of the proposals for the land at The Thames Industrial Estate, Princess Margaret Road,. Please feel
More informationSTRENSALL RAILWAY BUILDINGS CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL. In association with Strensall with Towthorpe Parish Council
STRENSALL RAILWAY BUILDINGS CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL In association with Strensall with Towthorpe Parish Council CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 2 2 Location and Context 3 3 Topography and Setting 4 4
More informationDesign Brief. Proposed housing development, White Horse Lane, Trowse FOR. Norfolk Homes
Design Brief Proposed housing development, White Horse Lane, Trowse FOR Norfolk Homes JOB NO: 10.2812.030 DATE: September 2010 1 Site The Village of Trowse is situated approximate 2 kilometers South East
More informationWQW Study Community Meeting June 26, 2017
WQW Study Community Meeting June 26, 2017 Agenda 7:00 Introductions Councillors Ana Bailao, Mike Layton, Gord Perks City Staff Team 7:10 Summary of WQW HCD Study Pourya Nazemi, Heritage Preservation Services
More information13. New Construction. Context & Character
13. New Construction Context & Character While historic districts convey a sense of time and place which is retained through the preservation of historic buildings and relationships, these areas continue
More informationHistoric Yonge Street HCD Study Public Meeting #2
Historic Yonge Street HCD Study Public Meeting #2 March 26, 2014 Archaeological Services Inc. Philip Goldsmith Architect Agenda: 7:00 p.m. Open House 7:30 p.m. Welcome and Presentation 8:00 p.m. Questions
More information11. ISLINGTON ROUTE SECTION ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS OVERVIEW OF ISLINGTON ROUTE SECTION... 2
11. ISLINGTON ROUTE SECTION ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS... 2 11.1 OVERVIEW OF ISLINGTON ROUTE SECTION... 2 11.2 POLICIES RELEVANT TO ALL WORKSITES IN ISLINGTON... 3 11.3 FARRINGDON
More informationREVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS HUDSON LIBRARY FIT OUT FOR MERIDEN SCHOOL, STRATHFIELD NSW
24 August 2018 Richard Arkell Head of Operations Meriden Anglican School 10-12 Redmyre Road Strathfield NSW 2135 REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS HUDSON LIBRARY FIT OUT FOR MERIDEN SCHOOL, STRATHFIELD NSW
More informationParish Derry Slopes ITM Coordinates ; NG Coordinates C House B1 and farm buildings B2; Registered Garden L061
Asset Ref No. HB/01/27/018A-C, Ballyarnett & Farm; Registered Historic Garden L061 Heritage Type Location Protection Status Condition Ownership (if known) Built Post-Medieval house & farm OS 6-inch map
More informationWELCOME. Land west of Great Canfield Road, Takeley. Welcome. Have your say. Pegasus Urban Design
01 WELCOME Welcome Gladman Developments Ltd have successfully invested in communities throughout the UK over the past 20 years, developing high quality and sustainable residential, commercial and industrial
More informationIntroduction. Welcome to this consultation regarding the draft redevelopment proposals for the former CeramTec factory on Sidmouth Road, Colyton.
Introduction Welcome to this consultation regarding the draft redevelopment proposals for the former CeramTec factory on Sidmouth Road, Colyton. We are currently considering options for the mixed-use redevelopment
More informationAnston House, Brighton
Anston House, Brighton Welcome to our Anston House community consultation event Welcome to our first public consultation event regarding Anston House, Brighton. The site has been acquired by One Preston
More informationWANSFORD. Village Design Statement. Supplementary Planning Guidance adopted by Peterborough City Council on 22 nd August 2003
WANSFORD Village Design Statement 2003 Supplementary Planning Guidance adopted by Peterborough City Council on 22 nd August 2003 Prospect of Wansford Bridge, St. Mary s Church and Bridge End, c.1902 Conceived,
More information