MOBILITY35 AESTHETICS

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "MOBILITY35 AESTHETICS"

Eustacia Phelps
5 years ago
Views:

1 MOBILITY35 AESTHETICS Aesthetics Working Group 3 March 29, 2016

2 What we heard regarding three themes Connectivity: Improve east/west pedestrian connections Safe and well marked Local identity defined by concrete panels Tie-in as applicable with downtown wayfinding Nature: Authentic natural elements Simple walls Terracing Creek/stream themes Nature as a buffer between roadway and bike/ped Maximize landscaped areas Sturdy/native plantings Art: Blank canvas option with murals later OR Walls & periodic art panel (1) designed by artist to be repeated along the corridor or several smaller repeating designs Trellis or panels with art on east/west crossings 2

3 What we heard regarding green infrastructure and sustainability Working Group would like to see: Use of native plantings which require minimal or no irrigation Wildflowers and no-mow areas Planting choices that support pollinators and wildlife Bio-swales Lighter colored concrete to reduce heat island effect LED lighting which minimizes energy usage 3

4 Aesthetics Working Group schedule and goals Meeting 1 December 1, 2015 Project overview Corridor assets Themes Public input needed! Take online survey Dec. 3, 2015 to Jan. 15, 2016 Next steps Fall 2016 Design team develops: Final working group summary report Final aesthetic guideline document Meeting 2 February 2, 2016 Develop up to three potential aesthetic themes Meeting 5 Summer 2016 Review final draft of refined preferred concept We are here Meeting 3 March 29, 2016 Develop up to three draft aesthetic concepts Second online survey Spring 2016 Meeting 4 Summer 2016 Determine preferred draft concept 4

5 Revisit elements that could have substantial impact East/west crossings Shared use path environment Landscape design (hard/soft) and performance* Bridges as viewed from the mainlanes* Wayfinding* Lighting* Vertical walls * Elements added by the working group during Meeting #2 5

6 Connectivity east/west cross street under I-35 mainlanes 6

7 Connectivity shared use path environment 7

8 Connectivity east/west cross street over I-35 mainlanes 8

9 Connectivity I-35 mainlanes under east/west cross street 9

10 Connectivity theme considerations Over-signage could create a cluttered look and adjacent wayfinding such as the city of Austin s program must be considered Location-specific items such as unique signage could be more costly to fabricate and replace over time Landscaping along corridor requires partnership with city of Austin for maintenance 10

11 Connectivity theme boards 11

12 Nature east/west cross street under I-35 mainlanes 12

13 Nature shared use path environment 13

14 Nature east/west cross street over I-35 mainlanes 14

15 Nature I-35 mainlanes under east/west cross street 15

16 Nature theme considerations Landscaping along corridor requires partnership with city of Austin for maintenance Constrained urban environment and space provide limited opportunities for planting and maintaining robust natural features Water usage may be a concern for city under water restrictions 16

17 Nature theme boards 17

18 Art east/west cross street under I-35 mainlanes 18

19 Art shared use path environment 19

20 Art east/west cross street over I-35 mainlanes 20

21 Art I-35 mainlanes under east/west cross street 21

22 Art theme considerations Artists/partners need to be identified to create, install, and fund pieces Timing of art installations needs to coincide with construction to avoid providing blank pallet for graffiti Art along the corridor requires partnership with city of Austin for maintenance Graffiti/defacement of art may trigger painting over with minimal opportunity for artist to repair Artworks may only be installed where they are not a distraction to drivers 22

23 Art theme boards 23

24 Aesthetics Working Group schedule and goals Meeting 1 December 1, 2015 Project overview Corridor assets Themes Public input needed! Take online survey Dec. 3, 2015 to Jan. 15, 2016 Next steps Fall 2016 Design team develops: Final working group summary report Final aesthetic guideline document Meeting 2 February 2, 2016 Develop up to three potential aesthetic themes Meeting 5 Summer 2016 Review final draft of refined preferred concept We are here Meeting 3 March 29, 2016 Develop up to three draft aesthetic concepts Second online survey Spring 2016 Meeting 4 Summer 2016 Determine preferred draft concept 24

25 Next steps Internal finalization and refinement of up to 3 concepts based on your input received tonight Public outreach survey will open spring 2016, includes 3 community outreach opportunities Aesthetics Working Group 4 meeting date: June 28, June 29, July 6 or July 7 Feedback on tonight (comment forms) 25

26 Stay involved: Web: Facebook:

MOBILITY35 AESTHETICS

MOBILITY35 AESTHETICS Aesthetics Working Group 5 August 10, 2016 Review of AWG 4 Consensus on three concepts to go to public survey Additional input received: Shading/location of trellises important Vegetation