PARCEL EVALUATION DATA SUMMARY PHASE 2A SAMPLING ZONE 16: THE HOUSING ZONE PARCEL 181: MULTIPLE UNIT HOUSING ALAMEDA POINT ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "PARCEL EVALUATION DATA SUMMARY PHASE 2A SAMPLING ZONE 16: THE HOUSING ZONE PARCEL 181: MULTIPLE UNIT HOUSING ALAMEDA POINT ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA"

Transcription

1 PARCEL EVALUATION DATA SUMMARY PHASE 2A SAMPLING ZONE 16: THE HOUSING ZONE PARCEL 181: MULTIPLE UNIT HOUSING ALAMEDA POINT ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACT NO. N D-2151 DELIVERY ORDER NO Submitted to: Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command 1230 Columbia Street San Diego, California Submitted by: IT Corporation 4005 Port Chicago Highway Concord, California Final January 2001

2 Table of Contents List of Tables... ii List of Figures... ii List of Appendices... ii 1.0 Introduction Objective Site Summary Data Sampling Chronology Summary of Sample Types Field Variations from Sampling Plans Summary of Existing IRP Data RCRA Sites Underground Storage Tanks/Fuel Lines Compliance Issues Parcel Evaluation Findings Parcel Evaluation Plan Sampling Zone Samples Sewer Corridor Sampling Data Quality/Data Validation Adjacent Parcels Conclusions and Recommendations Tier 1 Screening Analysis Parcel Reclassification...14 O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 i

3 List of Tables Table Title EBS Phase 2A Sample Collection Summary Laboratory Detected Parameters, EBS Phase 2A Analyte Detection Synopsis, EBS Phase 2A List of Figures Figure Title Sample Location Map, EBS Phase 2A TPH Concentrations in Soil, EBS Phase 2A List of Appendices Appendix A B C D Title Laboratory Data Reports (Fixed-Base Laboratory) Laboratory Data Reports (Screening Laboratory) Data Qualifiers and Validation Codes Human Health Risk-Based Tiered Screening Analysis O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 ii

4 1.0 Introduction Naval Air Station (NAS) Alameda (Alameda Point) has been designated for Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC). To facilitate the BRAC process, the Navy has initiated the Environmental Baseline Survey (EBS) to assess potential environmental concerns associated with real estate parcels affected by BRAC. Each parcel affected by BRAC is given an Environmental Condition of Property (ECP) category describing its suitability for BRAC transfer. The assessment of the environmental condition of a parcel requires the reevaluation of its ECP category. To reevaluate the ECP category, EBS and non-ebs data must be reviewed to determine suitability for transfer. ECP categories are defined in the Comprehensive Guide to the Environmental Baseline Survey (EBS Comprehensive Guide) (IT, 1999). The EBS process includes a series of basewide investigations to assess environmental impacts of base operations. The EBS Phase 1 investigation, conducted by ERM-West, included site visits, employee interviews, and historical research. Recommendations for additional investigations (EBS Phase 2A) were prepared by ERM-West and were presented in the Zone Analysis Plans (ZAPs) and Parcel Evaluation Plans (PEPs) (ERM-West, 1995a and 1995b). This Parcel Evaluation Data Summary Phase 2A Sampling Report (Phase 2A Parcel Report) presents the results of the EBS Phase 2A investigations at Parcel 181, which have been conducted in accordance with those plans. The investigative tasks associated with the parcel-specific EBS investigations have been conducted in accordance with the general intent of the Shell Work Plan and the PEPs (ERM- West, 1994 and 1995b). The Zone 16 ZAP and Parcel 181 PEP identified two zone-wide target areas and three parcel-specific target areas for assessment of Parcel 181 (ERM-West, 1995a and 1995b). Twenty-nine samples were collected from this parcel. A parallel basewide EBS sewer investigation, addressing the industrial, storm, and sanitary sewers was conducted in conjunction with the EBS Phase 2A investigation. The basewide sewer investigation was conducted in accordance with the Work Plan for Storm, Industrial, and Sanitary Sewer Sampling, Naval Air Station, Alameda (IT, 1994a). Sewer corridor samples were not collected from this parcel. The EBS analytical data were used to conduct a tiered screening analysis to evaluate impacts on human health from chemicals found on the parcel. Results of the tiered screening analysis are O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 1

5 included in this Phase 2A Parcel Report. Non-EBS data were integrated qualitatively with the EBS data to determine the ECP category reclassification. Installation Restoration Program (IRP) data were used to evaluate potential concerns. The status of underground storage tanks (USTs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), asbestos, and lead-based paint data were also considered during ECP category reclassification. The current ECP category of the parcel and associated discussion is presented in Section 5.2 of this Phase 2A Parcel Report and is also summarized in the Zone 16 Analysis Data Summary Report (Zone 16 Report). These discussions are based on agreements among the United States (US) Navy (Navy), US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) (Navy, 2000). References for documents cited in this parcel report are provided in the Zone 16 Report. 1.1 Objective Parcel 181 is located in Zone 16 (Housing Zone) in the northeastern corner of Alameda Point. The objective of the sampling effort at this site was to investigate and document the existing environmental condition at Parcel 181. This Phase 2A Parcel Report summarizes site data and outlines the results of EBS Phase 2A sampling. 1.2 Site Summary Data The following section briefly describes the location, history, and features of Parcel 181. The information presented in this report regarding the status of facilities is from the PEP for this parcel, and reflects the status of the facility on the date of the PEP publication (ERM-West, 1995b). If new information regarding the environmental condition of the property has been identified, or conditions have changed, this information is also provided. Zone: 16 Parcel: 181 Detailed facility information contained in the Tetra Tech Environmental Management, Inc. (TtEMI) EBS Qualitative Database is presented in the Zone 16 Report as Appendix A. This information includes building use, parcel utilities, PCB equipment, asbestos survey results, and building environmental conditions. Information in the qualitative EBS database is updated O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 2

6 periodically as activities and features in a given parcel change and may, currently, not reflect present-day status of the parcel. Description: Parcel 181 is located in the northeastern corner of Alameda Point. The parcel is irregularly shaped and approximately 35 acres. There are no RCRA sites on this parcel. Parcel 181 is located immediately northwest of the Fleet Industrial Supply Center, Oakland Alameda Annex (FISCO Annex) Scrapyard IRP Site (FISCO Annex Scrapyard IRP Site). Fifty-one buildings and one structure occupy approximately 30 percent of the parcel. Multiple Unit Housing: Fifty-one units are located on this parcel. The units were constructed in 1969 to house Navy personnel and their dependents. The units are of wood frame construction with stucco walls, and composite tar and gravel roofs. Each unit covers approximately 5,400 to 7,200 square feet. Open Space: Open space covers approximately 70 percent of the parcel. About 80 percent of the open space is lawn, while the remaining open space is paved with asphalt and concrete. Facility 591, a sanitary sewer pump station, is located in open space. Open space has generally been used for recreational purposes. No spills are documented, and staining was not observed during the EBS Phase 1 site inspection. 1.3 Sampling Chronology The samples from Parcel 181 were collected over the following periods: Parcel Samples: November 14 and 15, 1994 and May 22 and 23, 1995 Zone Samples: November 15, 1994 and May 22 and 23, 1995 Sewer Corridor Samples: none collected 1.4 Summary of Sample Types Table is a summary of samples collected for Parcel 181. The locations of the sampling points are shown on Figure Parcel Samples: 10 surface soil samples (plus 1 field duplicate) 8 soil gas samples (plus 1 field duplicate) O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 3

7 Zone Samples: 3 surface soil samples (plus 1 field duplicate) 1 subsurface soil sample 7 soil gas samples (plus 1 field duplicate) Sewer Corridor Samples: none collected EBS Phase 2A and sewer investigation samples were analyzed at mobile, screening, or fixedbase laboratories. Samples sent to the mobile laboratory were analyzed using standard field methods. Samples sent to the screening laboratory were analyzed using EPA SW-846 methods. Samples sent to the fixed-base laboratory were analyzed using EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) protocol. The mobile and screening laboratory samples have an M appended to the end of the sample number to distinguish them from samples sent to the fixed-base laboratory (e.g., sample number M represents a mobile or screening laboratory sample from Parcel 100). Fixed-base laboratory sample numbers corresponding to screening or mobile laboratory sample numbers omit the M suffix (e.g., fixed base laboratory sample corresponds with screening laboratory sample M). Samples analyzed at both a mobile (or screening) and a fixedbase laboratory are considered one sample (e.g., (M)). Samples collected for the sewer investigation address specific sewer systems and sample numbers reflect the type of sewer system addressed. Sewer samples are identified as follows: M storm sewer, S sanitary sewer, and I industrial waste sewer. The identifier is appended to the parcel number at the center of the sample number (e.g., the sample number 100M-001 represents a storm sewer sample, and sample number 100S-001M represents a sanitary sewer sample analyzed at the mobile or screening laboratory). Clean-out ports, lift, and pump stations are also assigned letter identifiers as required. These specific identifiers are explained on Table Field Variations from Sampling Plans Sample M was collected as a soil sample instead of a soil gas sample because the shallow groundwater table at that location prevented the collection of a soil gas sample. This sample was analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 4

8 1.6 Summary of Existing IRP Data Parcel 181 is a part of OU 5, IRP Site 25, and is adjacent to the FISCO Annex Scrapyard IRP Site. Marsh crust issues are associated with this parcel. Soil and groundwater at IRP Site 25 are impacted with elevated polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Groundwater and soil are also impacted with benzene. Contamination at IRP Site 25 is attributed to disposal of petroleum-related products in the marshlands, tidal channels, and the Oakland Inner Harbor. IRP Site 25 was created by dredging contaminated sediment and placing it at the site as fill material. This led to contamination in the upper 10 feet of fill and entrapment of petroleum-related products at the wetland/fill interface (marsh crust). Benzene groundwater plumes are suspected to be related to the marsh crust contamination. TtEMI conducted RI sampling at IRP Site 25 between October 1998 and April Sampling was based on EBS Phase 2B and 2B results, and included collection of the following samples: 68 surface soil samples from 0 to 2 feet bgs; 70 subsurface soil samples from 4 to 10 feet bgs; 17 Hydropunch groundwater samples from the top of the first water-bearing zone; and 8 monitoring well groundwater samples from the first water-bearing zone. Elevated concentrations of PAH and TPH as diesel and motor oil were detected in most of the soil samples. Concentrations ranged from 0.11 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 560 mg/kg for PAHs, and from 8.0 mg/kg to 11,000 mg/kg for TPH as diesel and motor oil. TPH as gasoline and xylene were detected infrequently at concentrations ranging from 0.6 mg/kg to 14 mg/kg for TPH as gasoline, and from 14 micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg) to 146 µg/kg for xylene (TtEMI and Uribe, 1999). The benzene plume in groundwater at IRP Site 25 is also associated with the FISCO Annex Scrapyard IRP Site. The FISCO Annex Scrapyard IRP Site is separate from Alameda Point. Three monitoring wells installed as part of the FISCO Annex Scrapyard IRP Site investigation are located on Parcel 181. Benzene concentrations in soil collected at Parcel 181 range up to 10,000 µg/kg. Other constituents detected in soil include VOCs, semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) (including PAHs), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), and metals. TPH, benzene, and metals (chromium, lead, and nickel) were detected at elevated concentrations in groundwater samples taken from monitoring wells at the FISCO Annex Scrapyard IRP Site. The benzene plume extends beneath Parcels 178, 179, 180, and 181 on Alameda Point and beneath FISCO Annex Parcels 22, 27, 28, 29, 30, 33, 34 and 35. Concentrations of benzene in O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 5

9 groundwater from these parcels exceed the 1998 EPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG). However, human health risk from benzene is below acceptable criteria for Alameda Point Parcels 178, 179, 180, and 181 (TtEMI, 1999b; ERM-West, 1999). The Updated Alameda Point/ Alameda Annex Benzene Soil Gas Investigation Summary and Summary of Crawl Space Benzene Air Sampling at Parcel 179 concluded that benzene is not volatilizing to a large extent from groundwater into soil gas, based on the frequency and distribution and of benzene detections in soil gas samples collected across Alameda Point Parcels 178, 179, 180, and 181 and the FISCO Annex Scrapyard IRP Site (TtEMI, 1999). The predicted benzene concentrations in indoor air, as modeled using the Johnson and Ettinger Heuristic Model for Predicting the Intrusion Rate of Contaminant Vapors into Buildings, do not pose an unacceptable cancer risk to residents living in the housing units at Alameda Point. The benzene plume is believed to be related to historic industrial activities that predate ownership by the Navy. An independent preliminary health consultation with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry concluded that a potential health risk exists on Parcel 178 due to the possible volatilization of VOC constituents in groundwater into indoor air. The Registry concluded that unsafe levels of VOCs had not yet migrated up through the soil, based on existing indoor air and soil gas sampling (ATSDR, 2000). Before the Alameda Point land surface was filled, the area between Alameda Island and the city of Oakland was salt marsh and tidal flats. The former surface of the marshlands is referred to as marsh crust (Lee and Prasker, 1979). The marsh crust represents a rich organic surface layer that was present in the static prefill configuration of the western Alameda Island. Marsh crust was investigated during the FISCO Annex Scrapyard IRP Site remedial investigation (RI) (PRC, 1995a). Marsh crust underlies most of the eastern section and a portion of the central area of Alameda Point. Marsh crust locally contains elevated levels of petroleum-related VOCs and SVOCs, likely originating from historic industries in the area. Marsh crust is known to underlie Parcel 170 at a depth of approximately 10 feet. The Navy has developed an institutional control to address the marsh crust and related deposits (former subtidal area). The institutional control is included in the Final Feasibility Study for the Marsh Crust and Groundwater at the FISCO Alameda Facility/Alameda Annex and Feasibility Study for the Marsh Crust and Former Subtidal Area at Alameda Point, dated March 31, 2000, and associated Revised Draft Final Record of Decision. The proposed institutional control prohibits excavation below a depth of 10 feet, unless protective measures are implemented. This institutional control will be enforced by the O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 6

10 City of Alameda under City of Alameda Ordinance No (City of Alameda, 2000) and DTSC. 1.7 RCRA Sites RCRA sites are not present on this parcel. 1.8 Underground Storage Tanks/Fuel Lines USTs and underground fuel lines are not present on this parcel. 1.9 Compliance Issues The following section provides information on lead-based paint, asbestos, and PCB issues on Parcel 181. Lead-based Paint: The presence of lead-based paint has been confirmed in townhouses and apartments on Parcel 181 (Navy, 1996e, 1996f, and 1996j). The Navy intends to handle this as a disclosure issue upon property transfer. Sampling for lead-based paint in soil was performed by the Navy Public Works Center in 1996 in the Zone 16 housing area. Forty-three surface soil samples were collected from Parcel 181. The lead concentration (1,158 mg/kg) exceeded the 1998 PRG (400 mg/kg) in only one sample, all other samples had lead concentrations less than 100 mg/kg (Navy, 1996e and 1996f). The EBS Comprehensive Guide presents a description of the findings and a figure showing approximate sample locations and results (IT, 1999). Asbestos: No asbestos issues have been identified on Parcel 181. PCBs: No PCB issues have been identified on Parcel Parcel Evaluation Findings The findings presented in this section summarize analytical data collected during the EBS Phase 2A investigation of Parcel 181. A complete list of target analytes for each sample is presented in Table Detected analytes are listed in Table A summary of the detected analytes, 1996 PRGs, and background concentrations are presented in Table Field duplicate and quality control sample results are not included in Table Appendix A provides a printout of validated analytical results from the fixed-base laboratory contained in IT Corporation (IT) Environmental Database Management System (ITEMS). Appendix B provides O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 7

11 a printout of screening laboratory analytical results contained in ITEMS. Appendix C provides a list of data qualifiers and validation codes. Constituent concentrations exceeding 1996 PRGs, background metal levels, or Petroleum Risk Based Screening Levels (RBSLs) at Alameda Point are discussed as elevated or high. Concentrations of compounds are discussed as low and moderate if detected below 1996 PRGs, RBSLs, and background levels (EPA, 1996; PRC, 1996; TerraNext, 1997; TtEMI, 1999a). RBSLs for petroleum were established for Alameda Point by identifying petroleum levels representing significant risk (PRC, 1996). Background levels for metals were established for soil and groundwater during studies conducted at Alameda Point (TerraNext, 1997; TtEMI, 1999a). Further evaluation of these data were conducted through the tiered screening analysis process as developed by PRC Environmental Management, Inc. (PRC) in NAS Alameda: Methodology for Human Health Risk-Based Tiered Screening Analysis Technical Memorandum (PRC, 1997). The results of the tiered screening analysis are summarized in Section 5.0. Parcel data were evaluated through the tiered screening analysis process using 1996 PRGs (EPA, 1996). After evaluating parcel data (circa 1997), 1998 PRGs were issued (EPA, 1998). The tiered screening analysis results presented in Appendix D of this report retain calculations based on 1996 PRGs; 1996 PRGs are presented in tiered screening Table D-1. The 1998 PRGs were used to calculate tier 2 results for parcels that required further tiered screening evaluation. These updated calculations are presented in the Parcel Reclassification Summaries contained in Appendix C of zone reports. In effect, this brings tiered screening analysis results of critical parcels up to date with 1998 PRGs. The most recent PRGs were issued in December 1999 (EPA, 1999). Recent changes to PRGs do not significantly impact the conclusions discussed below. 2.1 Parcel Evaluation Plan Sampling The Parcel 181 PEP identified three parcel-specific target areas on Parcel 181 (ERM-West, 1995b). Eighteen samples were collected from these target areas. Parcel 181 Target Area 1 (Southwest Area) Parcel 181 Target Area 1 (Southwest Area) includes the southwestern portion of the parcel, which may contain elevated metal concentrations as a result of activities on adjacent property (i.e., Parcel 178 and the FISCO Annex). Two surface soil samples were collected and analyzed for CLP metals. Six soil gas samples were collected and analyzed for VOCs. O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 8

12 Parcel 181 Target Area 1 Sampling Results Surface soil samples and were collected from depths of 0.5 to 1 foot below ground (bgs). Analytical results for these samples are summarized below. Results qualified with a J are estimated concentrations. Metal concentrations were detected in soil below 1996 PRGs or background levels. VOCs were not detected in soil gas. Parcel 181 Target Area 2 (Southeast Area) Parcel 181 Target Area 2 (Southeast Area) includes an area in the southeast portion of the parcel that appeared to be stained in a 1996 aerial photo. The stain covered approximately 63,000 square feet. Twelve sample locations were identified within the space surrounding the housing units. Six surface soil samples (plus 1 filed duplicate) were collected from depths of about 0.5 to 1.5 feet bgs and analyzed for TPH quantified as motor oil, gasoline, and diesel, and metals. Six soil gas samples (plus 1 field duplicate) were collected from depths of about 2.5 to 3 feet bgs and analyzed for VOCs. Parcel 181 Target Area 2 Sampling Results Analytical results for soil samples through and and soil gas samples M through M and M are summarized below. Metal concentrations in soil were detected below 1996 PRGs or background levels. TPH quantified as motor oil was detected in four soil samples ( through and ) at concentrations ranging from 33J to 45J mg/kg. TPH quantified as gasoline and diesel were not detected. TPH detections in soil are shown in Figure VOCs were not detected in soil gas. Parcel 181 Target Area 3 (Southeast Corner) Parcel 181 Target Area 3 includes the southeast corner of the parcel. Two surface soil samples were collected from depths of about 0.5 to 1 foot bgs and analyzed for TPH quantified as motor oil, gasoline, and diesel, metals, and pesticides/pcbs. Two soil gas samples were collected from depths of about 3 feet bgs and analyzed for VOCs. O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 9

13 Parcel 181 Target Area 3 Sampling Results Analytical results for soil samples and and soil gas samples M and M are summarized below. Metal concentrations were detected below 1996 PRGs or background levels. Endosulfan sulfate was detected in sample at a concentration of 2.0 µg/kg. This concentration is below the 1996 PRG (391,059 µg/kg). TPH compounds were not detected in soil. VOCs were not detected in soil gas. 2.2 Zone Samples The Zone 16 ZAP identified two zone-wide target areas on Parcel 181 (ERM-West, 1995a). Three surface soil samples, one subsurface soil sample, and seven soil gas samples were collected. Zone 16 Target Area 1 (Landscaped Areas) Zone 16 Target Area 1 (Landscaped Areas) includes all landscaped or formerly unpaved areas within the zone that may have been impacted by pesticide use. Three surface soil samples were collected and analyzed for CLP pesticides/pcbs. Zone 16 Target Area 1 Sampling Results Analytical results for surface soil samples , , and are summarized below DDT was detected in sample at a concentration of 6.5 µg/kg, This concentration is below the 1996 PRG (1,300 µg/kg). Zone 16 Target Area 2 (Filled Wetlands) Zone 16 Target Area 2 (Filled Wetlands) includes all former wetlands within the Housing Zone. These areas may have been impacted by historical releases (prior to filling) or disposal of organic compounds from a nearby oil refinery and two gas manufacturing plants. Seven subsurface gas samples (plus 1 field duplicate) and one subsurface soil sample were collected from depths ranging from 2.5 to 3 feet bgs and analyzed for VOCs by EPA method O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 10

14 Zone 16 Target Area 2 Sampling Results Analytical results for soil gas samples M, M, M, M through M, and M and subsurface soil sample M are summarized below. VOCs were not detected in soil or soil gas. 2.3 Sewer Corridor Sampling The work plan for storm, industrial, and sanitary sewer sampling did not require sewer samples on Parcel 181 (IT, 1994a). 3.0 Data Quality/Data Validation The fixed-base laboratory analytical data collected from this parcel are acceptable as reported. The CLP analytical data have passed EPA Level III validation and review. In accordance with the Shell Work Plan, 10 percent of all CLP data have undergone a Level IV validation (ERM- West, 1994). The screening laboratory analyses were conducted using standard protocol for certificate of analysis results. All data have been collected, analyzed, checked, and prepared in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPjP). The QAPjP for the EBS PEP sampling and analysis has been adopted from the ongoing basewide IRP. This QAPjP was originally written by Canonie Environmental (Canonie, 1990), and was supplemented by Section 3 of a work plan addendum prepared by PRC and Montgomery Watson (PRC and Montgomery Watson, 1993). There were no rejected data for samples collected from this parcel. All data are useable as presented. 4.0 Adjacent Parcels Parcel 181 is bounded by Parcels 178, 179, 180, 182, and 183 of Zone 16. The FISCO Annex borders the parcel to the south and east. Adjacent properties that may potentially impact Parcel 181 include the FISCO Annex Scrapyard IRP Site, Parcel 178, and Parcel 182. O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 11

15 Previous investigations of the FISCO Annex Scrapyard IRP Site revealed detectable concentrations of metals, VOCs, PCBs, and PAHs in soil. Additional information regarding IRP sites is provided in Section 1.6. Parcel 178 is the location of the Marina Village Housing project constructed in the early 1990s. At the time of construction, a vapor barrier was placed on the ground surface to protect residents from a perceived risk from soil gas vapors. Sampling and risk assessments conducted subsequent to construction of these housing units indicate that the risk levels are below acceptable criteria (TtEMI, 1999b). Additional information regarding this issue is summarized in the Parcel 179 Reclassification Summary (Zone 16 Report, Appendix C). 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The Parcel 181 PEP and Zone 16 ZAP identified three parcel-specific and two zone-wide target areas within parcel boundaries (ERM-West 1995a and 1995b). The target areas included Parcel 181 Target Area 1 (Southwest Area), Parcel 181 Target Area 2 (Southeast Area), Parcel 181 Target Area 3 (Southeast Corner), Zone 16 Target Area 1 (Landscaped Areas), and Zone 16 Target Area 2 (Filled Wetlands). Eleven zone-wide samples and eighteen parcelspecific samples were collected. The work plan for storm, industrial, and sanitary sewer sampling did not require sewer sampling on Parcel 181 (IT, 1994a). A summary of results and recommendations for each sampling area is presented below. Parcel 181 Target Area 1 (Southwest Area) Activities on adjacent property were thought to have potential to impact Parcel 181 with metals. Two surface soil samples were collected and analyzed for CLP metals. Metals were detected in both samples, however, concentrations did not exceed 1996 PRGs or background levels. At the concentrations detected, metals present in soil do not warrant further investigation of this target area. Parcel 181 Target Area 2 (Southeast Area) Parcel 181 Target Area 2 (Southeast Area) includes the area in the southeast portion of the parcel that appeared to be stained in a 1996 aerial photo. Six surface soil samples were collected and analyzed for TPH quantified as motor oil, gasoline, and diesel, and metals. Six subsurface soil gas samples were collected and analyzed for VOCs. O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 12

16 Metals concentrations in soil were below 1996 PRGs or background levels. The maximum TPH concentration, quantified as motor oil, was 45J mg/kg. TPH quantified as gasoline and diesel was not detected in soil. VOCs were not detected in soil gas. Few analytes were detected at low concentrations. These conditions do not suggest widespread adverse environmental conditions. Based on EBS Phase 2A investigation results, further investigation is not warranted in this target area. Parcel 181 Target Area 3 (Southeast Corner) Parcel 181 Target Area 3 includes the southeast corner of the parcel. Two surface soil samples were collected and analyzed for TPH quantified as motor oil, gasoline, and diesel, metals, and PCBs. Two soil gas samples were collected and analyzed for VOCs. Metal concentrations were below 1996 PRGs or background levels. TPH quantified as motor oil, gasoline, and diesel was not detected in soil and VOCs were not detected in soil gas. Endosulfan sulfate was detected in one of the two soil samples at a concentration (2.0J µg/kg) below the 1996 PRG (391,059 µg/kg). The low concentration of one pesticide compound does not suggest improper historic pesticide use or application practices and does not warrant additional investigation. The low concentrations of metals and the absence of TPH compounds, PCBs, and VOCs do not suggest widespread adverse environmental conditions and further investigation is not warranted in this target area. Zone 16 Target Area 1 (Landscaped Areas) Zone 16 Target Area 1 (Landscaped Areas) includes all landscaped or formerly unpaved areas within Zone 16 (Housing Zone) that may have been impacted by pesticide use. Three surface soil samples were collected and analyzed for CLP pesticides/pcbs. 4-4 DDT was detected in 1 of the 3 samples at a concentration (6.5 µg/kg), below the 1996 PRG (1,300 µg/kg). The low concentration of one pesticide compound does not suggest improper historic pesticide use or application practices and does not warrant additional investigation of Zone 16 Target Area 1 on this parcel. Zone 16 Target Area 2 (Filled Wetlands) Zone 16 Target Area 2 (Filled Wetlands) includes all former wetlands within Zone 16 (Housing Zone). These areas may have been impacted by historical releases (prior to filling) or disposal of O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 13

17 organic compounds from a nearby oil refinery and two gas manufacturing plants. One subsurface soil sample and seven soil gas samples were collected and analyzed for VOCs. VOCs were not detected in the eight samples collected. Based on these results, further investigation is not warranted in Zone 16 Target Area 2 on Parcel Tier 1 Screening Analysis A tier 1 screening analysis was conducted on EBS Phase 2A analytical data to evaluate potential impacts of detected constituents. Tier 1 screening was based on 1996 PRGs and conducted as directed in the Technical Memorandum (PRC, 1997). The tier 1 and tier 2 screening process is also described in the EBS Comprehensive Guide (IT, 1999). Tier 1 screening for Parcel 181 included analytical data from soil samples collected from Parcel 181 Target Areas 1, 2, and 3, and soil samples collected on Parcel 181 from Zone 16 Target Areas 1 and 2 during the EBS Phase 2A investigation. Tier 1 screening risk calculations for soil (Appendix D) indicate a potential Cancer Risk value of 3.64x10-9 and a Hazard Index (HI) of The Cancer Risk result does not exceed the acceptable criteria presented in the National Contingency Plan of 1.0x10-4 and the HI result for soil only slightly exceeds the HI criteria of 1.0 (EPA, 1990). Based on data obtained during the EBS Phase 2A investigation, Parcel 181 does not pose an unacceptable level of human health risk. 5.2 Parcel Reclassification The ECP category for Parcel 181 required reevaluation based on results of the EBS Phase 2A investigation and progress in parallel investigations related to the IRP, USTs, and other environmental concerns. The Zone 16 Report provides updated ECP category information in Appendix C. Parcels were reclassified in ECP categories based on updated tiered screening analysis, potential migration assessment, reuse, and risk management information. Parcel 181 is designated for residential reuse. Results of tiered screening analysis for Parcel 181 indicate a Cancer Risk of 3.6x10-9 and HI of 1.0 for the residential reuse scenario (Zone 16 Report, Appendix C). No other reuse scenarios were examined. VOCs, SVOCs, PAHs, and benzene impact soil and groundwater at IRP site 25 (Parcels 181, 182, and 183). Although EBS tiered screening analysis results are below National Contingency Plan (EPA, 1990) criteria for O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 14

18 the intended reuse, contaminant migration has been identified as a potential risk. The Navy has determined that Parcel 181 is not suitable for transfer. The Navy, DTSC, and EPA concurred as a result of reclassification meetings held in February 2000, and subsequent work through December 12, 2000, that Parcel 181 should be classified as ECP category 6. This decision is based on the presence of slightly elevated concentrations of PAHs in Parcel 181 soil and the potential of benzene-contaminated groundwater originating on adjacent property to migrate beneath Parcel 181. Parcel 181 has recently been included in IRP Site 25 with Parcels 182 and 183. O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00 15

19 TABLES O:\Alameda2000\Reports\Phase 2A_RevIV\Zone 16\ZONE doc Final 12/28/00

20 Table Alameda Point EBS Phase 2A Sample Collection Summary Project No Parcel 181 Sample # Date Type Matrix Purpose Sample Depth (ft)* Analytical Parameters Lab Type** Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil TA to 1.0 CLP Metals F Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil TA to 1.0 CLP Metals F Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil TA to 1.5 CLP Metals, TPH-Extractable, TPH-Purgeable F Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil TA to 1.0 CLP Metals, TPH-Extractable, TPH-Purgeable F Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil TA to 1.0 CLP Metals, TPH-Extractable, TPH-Purgeable F Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil TA to 1.0 CLP Metals, TPH-Extractable, TPH-Purgeable F Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil TA to 1.0 CLP Metals, TPH-Extractable, TPH-Purgeable F Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil TA to 1.0 CLP Metals, TPH-Purgeable, TPH-Extractable F Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil TA to 1.0 CLP Metals, CLP Pesticides/PCBs, TPH-Extractable, F TPH-Purgeable Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil TA to 1.0 CLP Metals, CLP Pesticides/PCBs, TPH-Extractable, F TPH-Purgeable M 22-May-95 Soil Gas Air TA to 2.5 VOC (8240) S M 23-May-95 Soil Gas Air TA to 2.5 VOC (8240) S M 22-May-95 Soil Gas Air TA to 2.5 VOC (8240) S M 22-May-95 Soil Gas Air TA to 2.5 VOC (8240) S M 23-May-95 Soil Gas Air TA to 2.5 VOC (8240) S M 23-May-95 Soil Gas Air TA to 2.5 VOC (8240) S M 25-May-95 Soil Gas Air TA to 3.0 VOC (8240) S M 25-May-95 Soil Gas Air TA to 3.0 VOC (8240) S Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil Zone 16 TA to 1.5 CLP Pesticides/PCBs F M 22-May-95 Soil Gas Air Zone 16 TA to 3.0 VOC (8240) S Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil Zone 16 TA to 1.0 CLP Pesticides/PCBs F M 22-May-95 Soil Gas Air Zone 16 TA to 2.5 VOC (8240) S Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil Zone 16 TA to 1.0 CLP Pesticides/PCBs F Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil Field Duplicate (1) 0.5 to 1.0 CLP Metals, TPH-Extractable, TPH-Purgeable F Nov-94 Surface Soil Soil Field Duplicate (2) 0.5 to 1.0 CLP Pesticides/PCBs F M 22-May-95 Soil Gas Air Zone 16 TA to 2.5 VOC (8240) S M 22-May-95 Subsurface Soil Soil Zone 16 TA to 3.0 VOC (8240) S M 22-May-95 Soil Gas Air Zone 16 TA to 2.5 VOC (8240) S M 23-May-95 Soil Gas Air Zone 16 TA to 2.5 VOC (8240) S M 22-May-95 Soil Gas Air Zone 16 TA to 2.5 VOC (8240) S O:\Alameda2000\Tables\Phase_2A\Table_1\Z16_2a_t1\181 1 of 2 Final 07/10/2000

21 Table Alameda Point EBS Phase 2A Sample Collection Summary Project No Parcel 181 Sample # Date Type Matrix Purpose Sample Depth (ft)* Analytical Parameters Lab Type** M 22-May-95 Soil Gas Air Zone 16 TA to 2.5 VOC (8240) S M 23-May-95 Soil Gas Air Field Duplicate (3) 2.5 to 2.5 VOC (8240) S M 23-May-95 Soil Gas Air Field Duplicate (4) 2.5 to 2.5 VOC (8240) S Notes: * Sample depth indicates depth below subgrade CLP - Contract Laboratory Program ** Lab Type: M = Mobile, S = Screening, F = Fixed-base. ft - feet "M" at end of sample number indicates Mobile or Screening level laboratory sample PCB - polychlorinated biphenyl (see Lab Type column). TA - Target Area "M" at center of sample number indicates Storm Sewer sample. TPH - total petroleum hydrocarbons "S" at center of sample number indicates Sanitary Sewer sample. VOC - volatile organic compounds (1) Field Duplicate of (2) Field Duplicate of (3) Field Duplicate of M. (4) Field Duplicate of M. O:\Alameda2000\Tables\Phase_2A\Table_1\Z16_2a_t1\181 2 of 2 Final 07/10/2000

22 Table Laboratory Detected Parameters Parcel 181 Sample Test Smpl Rslt Unit of Detect Number Panel Compound Name Type Type Result Measure Qlfr Limit CLP METALS ALUMINUM REG TRG MG/KG 5.6 ARSENIC TRG 5.7 MG/KG 3.4 BARIUM TRG 183 MG/KG 1.7 BERYLLIUM TRG 0.87 MG/KG B 0.2 CADMIUM TRG 0.4 MG/KG B 0.3 CALCIUM TRG 5050 MG/KG 3.6 CHROMIUM TRG 41.5 MG/KG EJ 0.6 COBALT TRG 13.7 MG/KG 1.5 COPPER TRG 35.3 MG/KG 0.4 IRON TRG MG/KG 1.8 LEAD TRG 65.4 MG/KG 1.5 MAGNESIUM TRG 5650 MG/KG 7.3 MANGANESE TRG 438 MG/KG NJ 0.32 MERCURY TRG 0.24 MG/KG J 0.18 NICKEL TRG 59.2 MG/KG 1.9 POTASSIUM TRG 2800 MG/KG J 71.2 SODIUM TRG 385 MG/KG B 2.3 VANADIUM TRG 46.6 MG/KG 1.4 ZINC TRG 104 MG/KG EJ CLP METALS ALUMINUM REG TRG MG/KG 5.6 ARSENIC TRG 5.3 MG/KG 0.68 BARIUM TRG 108 MG/KG 1.7 BERYLLIUM TRG 0.77 MG/KG B 0.2 CADMIUM TRG 0.39 MG/KG B 0.06 CALCIUM TRG 4900 MG/KG 3.6 CHROMIUM TRG 42.9 MG/KG EJ 0.12 COBALT TRG 10.8 MG/KG B 1.5 COPPER TRG 69.8 MG/KG 0.4 IRON TRG MG/KG 1.8 LEAD TRG 52.4 MG/KG 0.3 MAGNESIUM TRG 5820 MG/KG 7.3 MANGANESE TRG 406 MG/KG NJ 0.32 MERCURY TRG 0.28 MG/KG J 0.18 NICKEL TRG 54.6 MG/KG 1.9 POTASSIUM TRG 2350 MG/KG J 71.2 SELENIUM TRG 0.79 MG/KG B 0.6 SODIUM TRG 407 MG/KG B 2.3 VANADIUM TRG 48 MG/KG 1.4 ZINC TRG 139 MG/KG EJ CLP METALS ALUMINUM REG TRG 6230 MG/KG 5.6 ANTIMONY TRG 0.76 MG/KG BJN 0.66 ARSENIC TRG 2.6 MG/KG 0.68 BARIUM TRG 53.3 MG/KG 1.7 BERYLLIUM TRG 0.28 MG/KG B 0.2 CADMIUM TRG 0.23 MG/KG B 0.06 CALCIUM TRG 3210 MG/KG 3.6 CHROMIUM TRG 25.8 MG/KG EJ 0.12 COBALT TRG 7 MG/KG B 1.5 COPPER TRG 17.9 MG/KG 0.4 IRON TRG MG/KG 1.8 LEAD TRG 11.4 MG/KG 0.3 MAGNESIUM TRG 3360 MG/KG 7.3 MANGANESE TRG 225 MG/KG NJ CLP METALS NICKEL TRG 33.1 MG/KG 1.9 POTASSIUM TRG 887 MG/KG BJ 71.2 SODIUM TRG 336 MG/KG B 2.3 VANADIUM TRG 22.9 MG/KG 1.4 ZINC TRG 53 MG/KG EJ CLP METALS ALUMINUM REG TRG MG/KG 5.6 ANTIMONY TRG 0.79 MG/KG BNJ 0.66 O:\Alameda2000\Tables\Phase_2A\181_2a_2 1 of 4 Final 07/10/2000

23 Table Laboratory Detected Parameters Parcel 181 Sample Test Smpl Rslt Unit of Detect Number Panel Compound Name Type Type Result Measure Qlfr Limit CLP METALS ARSENIC TRG 3.3 MG/KG 0.68 BARIUM TRG 68.8 MG/KG 1.7 BERYLLIUM TRG 0.53 MG/KG B 0.2 CADMIUM TRG 0.18 MG/KG B 0.06 CALCIUM TRG 5480 MG/KG 3.6 CHROMIUM TRG 29 MG/KG EJ 0.12 COBALT TRG 9.1 MG/KG B 1.5 COPPER TRG 43.5 MG/KG 0.4 IRON TRG MG/KG 1.8 LEAD TRG 14.7 MG/KG 0.3 MAGNESIUM TRG 4540 MG/KG 7.3 MANGANESE TRG 329 MG/KG NJ 0.32 NICKEL TRG 35.8 MG/KG 1.9 POTASSIUM TRG 1140 MG/KG J 71.2 SODIUM TRG 415 MG/KG B 2.3 VANADIUM TRG 29.7 MG/KG 1.4 ZINC TRG 107 MG/KG EJ CLP METALS ALUMINUM REG TRG 7930 MG/KG 5.6 ARSENIC TRG 3.5 MG/KG 0.68 BARIUM TRG 88.1 MG/KG 1.7 BERYLLIUM TRG 0.64 MG/KG B 0.2 CADMIUM TRG 0.16 MG/KG B 0.06 CALCIUM TRG 3600 MG/KG 3.6 CHROMIUM TRG 28.7 MG/KG EJ 0.12 COBALT TRG 7.8 MG/KG B 1.5 COPPER TRG 24.6 MG/KG 0.4 IRON TRG MG/KG 1.8 LEAD TRG 43 MG/KG 0.3 MAGNESIUM TRG 3610 MG/KG 7.3 MANGANESE TRG 243 MG/KG NJ 0.32 NICKEL TRG 36 MG/KG 1.9 POTASSIUM TRG 1560 MG/KG J 71.2 SODIUM TRG 290 MG/KG B 2.3 VANADIUM TRG 29.9 MG/KG 1.4 ZINC TRG 68 MG/KG EJ CLP METALS ALUMINUM REG TRG 9000 MG/KG J 5.6 ARSENIC TRG 3 MG/KG 0.68 BARIUM TRG 51.4 MG/KG 1.7 BERYLLIUM TRG 0.71 MG/KG B 0.2 CADMIUM TRG 0.12 MG/KG B 0.06 CALCIUM TRG 3520 MG/KG 3.6 CHROMIUM TRG 39.3 MG/KG EJ 0.12 COBALT TRG 6.6 MG/KG B 1.5 COPPER TRG 40.3 MG/KG NJ 0.4 IRON TRG MG/KG 1.8 LEAD TRG 19.9 MG/KG EJ 0.3 MAGNESIUM TRG 3190 MG/KG 7.3 MANGANESE TRG 178 MG/KG 0.32 NICKEL TRG 31 MG/KG 1.9 POTASSIUM TRG 1060 MG/KG B 71.2 SODIUM TRG 257 MG/KG B 2.3 VANADIUM TRG 30.7 MG/KG 1.4 ZINC TRG 89.8 MG/KG EJ CLP METALS ALUMINUM REG TRG 6160 MG/KG J 5.6 ARSENIC TRG 3.4 MG/KG J 0.68 BARIUM TRG 33.8 MG/KG B 1.7 BERYLLIUM TRG 0.82 MG/KG B 0.2 CALCIUM TRG 3170 MG/KG 3.6 CHROMIUM TRG 30.4 MG/KG EJ 0.12 COBALT TRG 7.4 MG/KG B 1.5 COPPER TRG 22.5 MG/KG NJ 0.4 IRON TRG MG/KG 1.8 O:\Alameda2000\Tables\Phase_2A\181_2a_2 2 of 4 Final 07/10/2000

24 Table Laboratory Detected Parameters Parcel 181 Sample Test Smpl Rslt Unit of Detect Number Panel Compound Name Type Type Result Measure Qlfr Limit CLP METALS LEAD TRG 19.2 MG/KG EJ 0.3 MAGNESIUM TRG 2430 MG/KG 7.3 MANGANESE TRG 541 MG/KG J 0.32 NICKEL TRG 33.8 MG/KG 1.9 POTASSIUM TRG 679 MG/KG B 71.2 SODIUM TRG 267 MG/KG B 2.3 VANADIUM TRG 23.7 MG/KG 1.4 ZINC TRG 52.5 MG/KG EJ CLP METALS ALUMINUM REG TRG MG/KG 5.6 ARSENIC TRG 3.5 MG/KG 0.68 BARIUM TRG 64.4 MG/KG 1.7 BERYLLIUM TRG 0.54 MG/KG B 0.2 CADMIUM TRG 0.13 MG/KG B 0.06 CALCIUM TRG 4740 MG/KG 3.6 CHROMIUM TRG 33.1 MG/KG EJ 0.12 COBALT TRG 7 MG/KG B 1.5 COPPER TRG 49.2 MG/KG NJ 0.4 IRON TRG MG/KG 1.8 LEAD TRG 16.9 MG/KG EJ 0.3 MAGNESIUM TRG 3590 MG/KG 7.3 MANGANESE TRG 265 MG/KG 0.32 NICKEL TRG 28 MG/KG 1.9 POTASSIUM TRG 1040 MG/KG B 71.2 SODIUM TRG 478 MG/KG B 2.3 VANADIUM TRG 27.7 MG/KG 1.4 ZINC TRG 121 MG/KG EJ CLP METALS ALUMINUM REG TRG 7520 MG/KG J 5.6 ARSENIC TRG 2.8 MG/KG 0.68 BARIUM TRG 54.7 MG/KG 1.7 BERYLLIUM TRG 0.68 MG/KG B 0.2 CADMIUM TRG 0.11 MG/KG B 0.06 CALCIUM TRG 3890 MG/KG 3.6 CHROMIUM TRG 35.7 MG/KG EJ 0.12 COBALT TRG 7.3 MG/KG B 1.5 COPPER TRG 15.8 MG/KG NJ 0.4 IRON TRG MG/KG 1.8 LEAD TRG 16.2 MG/KG EJ 0.3 MAGNESIUM TRG 3380 MG/KG 7.3 MANGANESE TRG 226 MG/KG 0.32 NICKEL TRG 35.1 MG/KG 1.9 POTASSIUM TRG 1020 MG/KG B 71.2 SODIUM TRG 295 MG/KG B 2.3 VANADIUM TRG 30.4 MG/KG 1.4 ZINC TRG 50.8 MG/KG EJ CLP METALS ALUMINUM REG TRG 6090 MG/KG J 5.6 ANTIMONY TRG 0.86 MG/KG BNJ 0.66 ARSENIC TRG 1.3 MG/KG B 0.68 BARIUM TRG 32.8 MG/KG B 1.7 BERYLLIUM TRG 1 MG/KG B 0.2 CALCIUM TRG 3690 MG/KG 3.6 CHROMIUM TRG 32.4 MG/KG EJ 0.12 COBALT TRG 6.1 MG/KG B 1.5 COPPER TRG 18.6 MG/KG NJ 0.4 IRON TRG MG/KG 1.8 LEAD TRG 2.8 MG/KG EJ 0.3 MAGNESIUM TRG 2920 MG/KG 7.3 MANGANESE TRG 179 MG/KG 0.32 NICKEL TRG 28.8 MG/KG 1.9 POTASSIUM TRG 614 MG/KG B 71.2 SODIUM TRG 261 MG/KG B 2.3 THALLIUM TRG 0.49 MG/KG BJ 0.46 VANADIUM TRG 25.4 MG/KG 1.4 ZINC TRG 41.7 MG/KG EJ 0.8 O:\Alameda2000\Tables\Phase_2A\181_2a_2 3 of 4 Final 07/10/2000

25 Table Laboratory Detected Parameters Parcel 181 Sample Test Smpl Rslt Unit of Detect Number Panel Compound Name Type Type Result Measure Qlfr Limit CLP METALS ALUMINUM FD TRG 3930 MG/KG J 5.6 ARSENIC TRG 1.4 MG/KG BJ 0.68 BARIUM TRG 32.8 MG/KG B 1.7 BERYLLIUM TRG 0.59 MG/KG B 0.2 CALCIUM TRG 2030 MG/KG 3.6 CHROMIUM TRG 26.2 MG/KG EJ 0.12 COBALT TRG 5.1 MG/KG B 1.5 COPPER TRG 24.5 MG/KG NJ 0.4 IRON TRG 7080 MG/KG 1.8 LEAD TRG 7.3 MG/KG EJ 0.3 MAGNESIUM TRG 2240 MG/KG 7.3 MANGANESE TRG 261 MG/KG J 0.32 NICKEL TRG 29.9 MG/KG 1.9 POTASSIUM TRG 577 MG/KG B 71.2 SODIUM TRG 233 MG/KG B 2.3 VANADIUM TRG 16.5 MG/KG 1.4 ZINC TRG 49.9 MG/KG EJ CLP PEST/PCB ENDOSULFAN SULFATE REG TRG 2 UG/KG JP CLP PEST/PCB 4,4'-DDT REG TRG 6.5 UG/KG J TPHEXT TPHC AS MOTOR OIL REG TRG 33 MG/KG YJ TPHEXT TPHC AS MOTOR OIL REG TRG 37 MG/KG YJ TPHEXT TPHC AS MOTOR OIL REG TRG 44 MG/KG YJ TPHEXT TPHC AS MOTOR OIL REG TRG 45 MG/KG YJ TPHEXT TPHC AS MOTOR OIL REG TRG 41 MG/KG YJ 22 O:\Alameda2000\Tables\Phase_2A\181_2a_2 4 of 4 Final 07/10/2000

26 Table Analyte Detection Synopsis Parcel 181 Sample CAS Sample Unit of Detect Start End PRG PRG Backgrd Backgrd Backgrd RBSL RBSL Number Compound Name Number Matrix Result Measure Limit Qlfr Depth Depth PRG Desc Units Area Conc Units RBSL DESC Units ,4'-DDT SOIL 6.5 UG/KG 3.7 J ca MG/KG PINK NA NA NA NA NA ALUMINUM , MG/KG 5.6 J , nc MG/KG PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA ALUMINUM , MG/KG 5.6 J , nc MG/KG PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA ALUMINUM , MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA ALUMINUM , MG/KG 5.6 J , nc MG/KG PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA ALUMINUM , MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA ALUMINUM , MG/KG 5.6 J , nc MG/KG PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA ALUMINUM , MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA ALUMINUM , MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA ALUMINUM , MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA ALUMINUM , MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA ANTIMONY MG/KG 0.6 BJN nc MG/KG PINK 5.7 MG/KG NA NA NA ANTIMONY MG/KG 0.6 BNJ nc MG/KG PINK 5.7 MG/KG NA NA NA ANTIMONY MG/KG 0.6 BNJ nc MG/KG PINK 5.7 MG/KG NA NA NA ARSENIC MG/KG 0.6 B ca MG/KG PINK 8.7 MG/KG NA NA NA ARSENIC MG/KG ca MG/KG PINK 8.7 MG/KG NA NA NA ARSENIC MG/KG ca MG/KG PINK 8.7 MG/KG NA NA NA ARSENIC MG/KG ca MG/KG PINK 8.7 MG/KG NA NA NA ARSENIC MG/KG ca MG/KG PINK 8.7 MG/KG NA NA NA ARSENIC MG/KG 0.6 J ca MG/KG PINK 8.7 MG/KG NA NA NA ARSENIC MG/KG ca MG/KG PINK 8.7 MG/KG NA NA NA ARSENIC MG/KG ca MG/KG PINK 8.7 MG/KG NA NA NA ARSENIC MG/KG ca MG/KG PINK 8.7 MG/KG NA NA NA ARSENIC MG/KG ca MG/KG PINK 8.7 MG/KG NA NA NA BARIUM MG/KG 1.7 B , nc MG/KG PINK 103 MG/KG NA NA NA BARIUM MG/KG 1.7 B , nc MG/KG PINK 103 MG/KG NA NA NA BARIUM MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 103 MG/KG NA NA NA BARIUM MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 103 MG/KG NA NA NA BARIUM MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 103 MG/KG NA NA NA BARIUM MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 103 MG/KG NA NA NA BARIUM MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 103 MG/KG NA NA NA BARIUM MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 103 MG/KG NA NA NA BARIUM MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 103 MG/KG NA NA NA BARIUM MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 103 MG/KG NA NA NA BERYLLIUM MG/KG 0.2 B ca MG/KG PINK 1.2 MG/KG NA NA NA BERYLLIUM MG/KG 0.2 B ca MG/KG PINK 1.2 MG/KG NA NA NA BERYLLIUM MG/KG 0.2 B ca MG/KG PINK 1.2 MG/KG NA NA NA BERYLLIUM MG/KG 0.2 B ca MG/KG PINK 1.2 MG/KG NA NA NA BERYLLIUM MG/KG 0.2 B ca MG/KG PINK 1.2 MG/KG NA NA NA BERYLLIUM MG/KG 0.2 B ca MG/KG PINK 1.2 MG/KG NA NA NA BERYLLIUM MG/KG 0.2 B ca MG/KG PINK 1.2 MG/KG NA NA NA BERYLLIUM MG/KG 0.2 B ca MG/KG PINK 1.2 MG/KG NA NA NA BERYLLIUM MG/KG 0.2 B ca MG/KG PINK 1.2 MG/KG NA NA NA O:\Alameda2000\Tables\Phase_2A\181_2a_3 1 of 5 Final 07/10/2000

27 Table Analyte Detection Synopsis Parcel 181 Sample CAS Sample Unit of Detect Start End PRG PRG Backgrd Backgrd Backgrd RBSL RBSL Number Compound Name Number Matrix Result Measure Limit Qlfr Depth Depth PRG Desc Units Area Conc Units RBSL DESC Units BERYLLIUM SOIL 1 MG/KG 0.2 B ca MG/KG PINK 1.2 MG/KG NA NA NA CADMIUM MG/KG 0 B nc MG/KG PINK 1.33 MG/KG NA NA NA CADMIUM MG/KG 0 B nc MG/KG PINK 1.33 MG/KG NA NA NA CADMIUM MG/KG 0 B nc MG/KG PINK 1.33 MG/KG NA NA NA CADMIUM MG/KG 0 B nc MG/KG PINK 1.33 MG/KG NA NA NA CADMIUM MG/KG 0 B nc MG/KG PINK 1.33 MG/KG NA NA NA CADMIUM MG/KG 0 B nc MG/KG PINK 1.33 MG/KG NA NA NA CADMIUM MG/KG 0 B nc MG/KG PINK 1.33 MG/KG NA NA NA CADMIUM MG/KG 0.3 B nc MG/KG PINK 1.33 MG/KG NA NA NA CALCIUM , MG/KG NA NA NA PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA CALCIUM , MG/KG NA NA NA PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA CALCIUM , MG/KG NA NA NA PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA CALCIUM , MG/KG NA NA NA PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA CALCIUM , MG/KG NA NA NA PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA CALCIUM , MG/KG NA NA NA PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA CALCIUM , MG/KG NA NA NA PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA CALCIUM , MG/KG NA NA NA PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA CALCIUM , MG/KG NA NA NA PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA CALCIUM , MG/KG NA NA NA PINK 12, MG/KG NA NA NA CHROMIUM MG/KG 0.1 EJ ca MG/KG PINK 50 MG/KG NA NA NA CHROMIUM MG/KG 0.1 EJ ca MG/KG PINK 50 MG/KG NA NA NA CHROMIUM MG/KG 0.1 EJ ca MG/KG PINK 50 MG/KG NA NA NA CHROMIUM MG/KG 0.1 EJ ca MG/KG PINK 50 MG/KG NA NA NA CHROMIUM MG/KG 0.1 EJ ca MG/KG PINK 50 MG/KG NA NA NA CHROMIUM MG/KG 0.1 EJ ca MG/KG PINK 50 MG/KG NA NA NA CHROMIUM MG/KG 0.1 EJ ca MG/KG PINK 50 MG/KG NA NA NA CHROMIUM MG/KG 0.1 EJ ca MG/KG PINK 50 MG/KG NA NA NA CHROMIUM MG/KG 0.6 EJ ca MG/KG PINK 50 MG/KG NA NA NA CHROMIUM MG/KG 0.1 EJ ca MG/KG PINK 50 MG/KG NA NA NA COBALT MG/KG 1.5 B , nc MG/KG PINK 19.3 MG/KG NA NA NA COBALT MG/KG 1.5 B , nc MG/KG PINK 19.3 MG/KG NA NA NA COBALT MG/KG 1.5 B , nc MG/KG PINK 19.3 MG/KG NA NA NA COBALT MG/KG 1.5 B , nc MG/KG PINK 19.3 MG/KG NA NA NA COBALT MG/KG 1.5 B , nc MG/KG PINK 19.3 MG/KG NA NA NA COBALT MG/KG 1.5 B , nc MG/KG PINK 19.3 MG/KG NA NA NA COBALT MG/KG 1.5 B , nc MG/KG PINK 19.3 MG/KG NA NA NA COBALT MG/KG 1.5 B , nc MG/KG PINK 19.3 MG/KG NA NA NA COBALT MG/KG 1.5 B , nc MG/KG PINK 19.3 MG/KG NA NA NA COBALT MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 19.3 MG/KG NA NA NA COPPER MG/KG 0.4 NJ , nc MG/KG PINK 24.3 MG/KG NA NA NA COPPER MG/KG , nc MG/KG PINK 24.3 MG/KG NA NA NA COPPER MG/KG 0.4 NJ , nc MG/KG PINK 24.3 MG/KG NA NA NA COPPER MG/KG 0.4 NJ , nc MG/KG PINK 24.3 MG/KG NA NA NA O:\Alameda2000\Tables\Phase_2A\181_2a_3 2 of 5 Final 07/10/2000

A D D E N D U M N O. 1 To The Contract Documents Date: Project: Facilities Development & Planning Portable Building Relocation

A D D E N D U M N O. 1 To The Contract Documents Date: Project: Facilities Development & Planning Portable Building Relocation LMA A D D E N D U M N O. 1 To The Contract Documents Date: 2-1-2018 Project: Facilities Development & Planning Portable Building Relocation Long Beach Unified School District Bid# FAC17-1718 The following

More information

MW-401B Area Soil Remediation Report

MW-401B Area Soil Remediation Report MW-401B Area Soil Remediation Report Maine Yankee Decommissioning Project Corrective Measures Study December 2004 Prepared for: Maine Yankee 321 Old Ferry Road, Bailey Point Wiscasset, ME 04578 Prepared

More information

SECTION STRUCTURAL SOIL

SECTION STRUCTURAL SOIL SECTION 329110 STRUCTURAL SOIL PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS 1.2 SUMMARY A. This work shall consist of manufacturing and supplying a narrowly graded rock to support pavement without compression

More information

06-96 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM OUTDOOR WOOD BOILERS

06-96 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM OUTDOOR WOOD BOILERS Chapter 150: CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM OUTDOOR WOOD BOILERS SUMMARY: This regulation establishes particulate emission standards, siting criteria and labeling requirements for outdoor wood boilers. 1. Applicability.

More information

NM Water Resources Research Institute Environmental Conditions of the Animas and San Juan Watersheds with Emphasis on Gold King Mine

NM Water Resources Research Institute Environmental Conditions of the Animas and San Juan Watersheds with Emphasis on Gold King Mine The Gold King Mine Spill in the Context of Historical Water Quality Impacts to Utah s San Juan River and Lake Powell NM Water Resources Research Institute Environmental Conditions of the Animas and San

More information

COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN

COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN A CONCEPTUAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR TA-4 AN URBAN RESERVE AREA OF THE CITY TALENT City of Talent Adopted by City Council Resolution No., June, 2015 PART

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Oak Park Elementary School 1200 Front Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Oak Park Elementary School 1200 Front Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site:July 5, 2018 1200 Front Street Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 9, 2018 thru May 11, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora,

More information

Appendix F ! " #! $ " # " % & (' ) + * *, - * * *, - + * * * / / 0. @ CBA ED FB G H E I K J G L G M I J EB @ R : ; < 9 > >? = ND O QP! " # $ %! & $! ' ( ) ( * +, ( -. + / - 0 1 ( 2 S T S S U S

More information

USA Addition of South & East Side Residential Parcels. USA Deletion of a Town of Christiana Parcel. Conversion from USA to Limited Service Area

USA Addition of South & East Side Residential Parcels. USA Deletion of a Town of Christiana Parcel. Conversion from USA to Limited Service Area Village of Rockdale Village of Rockdale 148 Water Street Cambridge, WI 53523 Phone 608.423.1497 Fax 608.423.9694 Urban Service Area (USA) Amendment USA Addition of South & East Side Residential Parcels

More information

Former Truck Maintenance Garage Soil Remediation Report

Former Truck Maintenance Garage Soil Remediation Report Former Truck Maintenance Garage Soil Remediation Report Maine Yankee Decommissioning Project Corrective Measures Study February 2005 Prepared for: Maine Yankee 321 Old Ferry Road, Bailey Point Wiscasset,

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. McKnight School Service Center 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. McKnight School Service Center 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 9, 2018 thru May 11, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

ATTACHMENT A BIORETENTION SOIL SPECIFICATION

ATTACHMENT A BIORETENTION SOIL SPECIFICATION 1.00 BIORETENTION SOIL ATTACHMENT A BIORETENTION SOIL SPECIFICATION Bioretention soil shall achieve an initial infiltration rate of at least 8-inch per hour nor more than 20 inches per hour in situ and

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Krug Elementary School 240 Melrose Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Krug Elementary School 240 Melrose Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 240 Melrose Avenue Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 1, 2018 thru May 3, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

DRAFT SCOPE OF SERVICES PEER REVIEW OF BAKER PARK. Request for Qualifications (RFQ)

DRAFT SCOPE OF SERVICES PEER REVIEW OF BAKER PARK. Request for Qualifications (RFQ) DRAFT SCOPE OF SERVICES PEER REVIEW OF BAKER PARK Request for Qualifications (RFQ) The following scope of services is presented for consideration and development of firm qualifications submittal. Some

More information

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Zone: I-3. Tier:

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at  Zone: I-3. Tier: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.

More information

Public Review Draft Oceanside Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Communities Conservation Plan

Public Review Draft Oceanside Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Communities Conservation Plan Oceanside Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Communities Conservation Plan Prepared for City of Oceanside Planning Department 300 N. Coast Highway Oceanside, CA 92054 Prepared by Ogden Environmental

More information

Brine Generation Study

Brine Generation Study DOE/WIPP 00-2000 Brine Generation Study April 2000 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Carlsbad, New Mexico Processing and final preparation of this report was performed by the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Management

More information

UNDERSTANDING ELECTRICAL SAFETY RISKS

UNDERSTANDING ELECTRICAL SAFETY RISKS UNDERSTANDING ELECTRICAL SAFETY RISKS The Electrical Safety Program at BC Safety Authority (BCSA) is responsible for overseeing the safety of electrical systems across British Columbia in accordance with

More information

SECTION SOIL PREPARATION

SECTION SOIL PREPARATION SECTION 329113 SOIL PREPARATION PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Components of planting mediums. 2. Testing and certification of components. 3. Mixing of planting mediums. 4. Transporting

More information

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 13, 2017 Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner REQUEST The applicant requests a Design Review Permit Modification

More information

Standard PRC Transmission Relay Loadability

Standard PRC Transmission Relay Loadability A. Introduction 1. Title: Transmission Relay Loadability 2. Number: PRC-023-2 3. Purpose: Protective relay settings shall not limit transmission loadability; not interfere with system operators ability

More information

API MANUAL OF PETROLEUM MEASUREMENT STANDARDS

API MANUAL OF PETROLEUM MEASUREMENT STANDARDS API MANUAL OF PETROLEUM MEASUREMENT STANDARDS Chapter 22 Testing Protocols Section 1 General Guidelines for Developing Testing Protocols for Devices Used in the Measurement of Hydrocarbon Fluids Type Testing

More information

Permitting and Licensing for Hazardous Material Use and Storage

Permitting and Licensing for Hazardous Material Use and Storage Page #: 1 of 7 Last Reviewed/Update Date: 4/28/11 Permitting and Licensing for Hazardous Material Use and Storage 1. Purpose / Background National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) codes, State of Massachusetts

More information

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC 2018 November 15 Page 1 of 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application was submitted by Rick Balbi Architect on 2017 August 31 on behalf of Sable Developments Ltd, and with authorization from

More information

WELCOME PG&E HUNTERS POINT COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE THANK YOU FOR COMING PG&E

WELCOME PG&E HUNTERS POINT COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE THANK YOU FOR COMING PG&E WELCOME PG&E HUNTERS POINT COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE THANK YOU FOR COMING NEWHALL ST JENNINGS ST B SHORELINE I SHORELINE EVANS AVE J C/D MIDDLE POINT ROAD OPERATING SUBSTATION A SHORELINE H Remediation Complete

More information

RACER Properties in Pontiac

RACER Properties in Pontiac RACER Properties in Pontiac Bruce Rasher, Redevelopment Manager brasher@racertrust.org Pontiac, MI Fiero Assembly Plant Pontiac North Campus Industrial Land Fiero Powerhouse 2017 Google Pontiac North Campus

More information

Ministerial Decree No. 14/2005 (VI. 28.) KvVM. on the rules concerning the screening surveys of remedial site investigations.

Ministerial Decree No. 14/2005 (VI. 28.) KvVM. on the rules concerning the screening surveys of remedial site investigations. Ministerial Decree No. 14/2005 (VI. 28.) KvVM on the rules concerning the screening surveys of remedial site investigations Authorised by the provisions set forth in clause m), Paragraph (8), Article 110

More information

Request for Statement of Interest in Implementation of the Roosevelt Road Redevelopment Plan

Request for Statement of Interest in Implementation of the Roosevelt Road Redevelopment Plan 425 Hillside Avenue Request for Statement of Interest in Implementation of the Roosevelt Road Redevelopment Plan I. INTRODUCTION The is seeking the services of a qualified consulting firm to prepare plans

More information

06-96 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM OUTDOOR WOOD BOILERS

06-96 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM OUTDOOR WOOD BOILERS Chapter 150: CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM OUTDOOR WOOD BOILERS SUMMARY: This regulation establishes particulate emission standards, siting criteria and labeling requirements for outdoor wood boilers, including

More information

Tim O Hare Associates LLP Howbery Park Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BA T:

Tim O Hare Associates LLP Howbery Park Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8BA T: Mr Andy Spetch British Sugar plc Co-Products Oundle Road Peterborough PE2 9QU Dear Sirs 26 th April 2016 Our Ref: TOHA/16/6623/SS Your Ref: O/N 50098076 Topsoil Analysis Report: Wissington Hort Loam We

More information

MINIMUM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT FOR AIR FORCE FLIGHTLINE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS:

MINIMUM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT FOR AIR FORCE FLIGHTLINE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS: AFRL-ML-TY-TR-02-4540 MINIMUM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT FOR AIR FORCE FLIGHTLINE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS: EXTINGUISHING PERFORMANCE AGAINST 3-DIMENSIONAL AND HIDDEN FIRES MAY 2002 Approved for Public Release;

More information

April 4, 2013 Rana Ahmadi San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94103

April 4, 2013 Rana Ahmadi San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94103 April 4, 2013 Rana Ahmadi San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94103 RE: CEQA Review Ocean Avenue Public Plaza Block/Lot 3180/001, Case No.

More information

Phase One Archaeological Investigation Results, James Madison Park Master Development Plan Project, City of Madison, Dane County, Wisconsin

Phase One Archaeological Investigation Results, James Madison Park Master Development Plan Project, City of Madison, Dane County, Wisconsin Phase One Archaeological Investigation Results, James Madison Park Master Development Plan Project, City of Madison, Dane County, Wisconsin Prepared for the City of Madison Parks Department 28 January

More information

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLN13-0157 TO CONSTRUCT ELEVEN

More information

2.1.8 Cultural Resources Regulatory Setting. Affected Environment, Environmental

2.1.8 Cultural Resources Regulatory Setting. Affected Environment, Environmental REVISED DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ Affected Environment, Environmental 2.1.8 Cultural Resources This section evaluates the potential for historical and archaeological resources within the proposed

More information

17.1 INTRODUCTION CONTEXT CONCLUSIONS

17.1 INTRODUCTION CONTEXT CONCLUSIONS CHAPTER 17. FLOODPLAIN 17.1 INTRODUCTION 17.1.1 CONTEXT A floodplain is part of an extensive drainage and filtration system and water cycle that serves to contain flood waters from storms. Floodplain areas

More information

Electronic Waste and the Socio Environmental Concern

Electronic Waste and the Socio Environmental Concern Electronic Waste and the Socio Environmental Concern Dr. Azza Morssy UNIDO-Vienna a.morssy@unido.org E-waste Management Forum 8-9 February 2009 In Cairo 1 Points for discussion 1.What is electronic waste

More information

ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY

ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY NEW RIVER BUILDING AND FITNESS CENTER Draft Environmental Impact Statement CEQR No. : 14DCP019M Lead Agency: New York City Department of City Planning Prepared By: AKRF, Inc. November

More information

3. Are there any projects exempt from the definition of Regulated Projects?

3. Are there any projects exempt from the definition of Regulated Projects? STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS: OVERVIEW OF PROVISION C.3 Background: On October 14, 2009, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, issued a municipal regional stormwater permit (MRP)

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Rollins Elementary School 950 Kane Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Rollins Elementary School 950 Kane Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 950 Kane Street Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 15, 2018 thru May 18, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

The South Macleod Trail Community and Employment Centre

The South Macleod Trail Community and Employment Centre The South Macleod Trail Community and Employment Centre Community and Neighbourhood Planning Module Context During the 1950s, the movement of people away from urban centres led to the evolution of the

More information

Poisoned Park? How Exide s Lead Contamination Risks Frisco s Grand Park

Poisoned Park? How Exide s Lead Contamination Risks Frisco s Grand Park Frisco City Hall has big plans to transform Stewart Creek into a Grand Park with lots of water features for kids to play in. Poisoned Park? How Exide s Lead Contamination Risks Frisco s Grand Park But

More information

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAY 8, 2014 The Planning and Development Department hereby forwards to the Planning

More information

1 2 3 Licence No:

1 2 3 Licence No: TRICS 2007(a) 06/05/07 Page 1 of 6 List of TRICS Research Publications TRICS Report 89/1 Traffic Generation Study of Offices & High Tech Sites London Borough of Hillingdon The report contains detailed

More information

Declaration of Compliance BS3882:2015

Declaration of Compliance BS3882:2015 Declaration of Compliance BS3882:2015 Soil source: British Sugar TOPSOIL This declaration confirms that the topsoil represented by the attached Topsoil Analysis Report conforms to the requirements of the

More information

Juan C. Feliciano Marvel Marchand Architects. Gowanus Green Master Plan: Reclaiming a Brownfield Site for NYC May 10 th, 2017

Juan C. Feliciano Marvel Marchand Architects. Gowanus Green Master Plan: Reclaiming a Brownfield Site for NYC May 10 th, 2017 Juan C. Feliciano Marvel Marchand Architects Gowanus Green Master Plan: Reclaiming a Brownfield Site for NYC May 10 th, 2017 Aerial view. Source: Google Maps Historical Facts The Gowanus Canal is a 100-foot-wide,

More information

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION North Bethany Subarea Stream Corridors: Existing Regulations In Oregon, there is a distinct difference between the land use rules that apply in rural

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Waldo Middle School 56 Jackson Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Waldo Middle School 56 Jackson Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 56 Jackson Street Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 8, 2018 thru May 10, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

Figure 1 Cypress Street Study Area Location Map

Figure 1 Cypress Street Study Area Location Map July 20, 2016 TO: FROM: Jim Massarelli Director of Engineering Jeff Julkowski, PE Michael Burke, PE SUBJECT: Cypress Street Study Area Stormwater Analysis (CBBEL Project No. 16-0058) At the request of

More information

Release Abatement Measure Status Report

Release Abatement Measure Status Report Release Abatement Measure Status Report F.B. Rogers 414 West Water Street Taunton, Massachusetts September 15, 2011 Prepared for: Mr. Kevin Shea City of Taunton Office of Economic and Community Development

More information

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department ROYAL OAKS NORTH OUTLINE PLAN OP-07-03 NW 35-71-6 W6M May 7, 2007 Royal Oaks North Outline Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION........ 3 1.1 Purpose

More information

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Need 1-1 1.2 Goals and Objectives 1-3 1.3 Overview of the Planning Process 1-5 1.4 Federal and State Requirements and

More information

Redevelopment Plan for the Former South Gifford Road Landfill

Redevelopment Plan for the Former South Gifford Road Landfill Redevelopment Plan for the Former South Gifford Road Landfill Summary Report July 2018 Treasure Coast Regional Planing Council Former South Gifford Road Landfill Site Redevelopment Plan July 2018 prepared

More information

Humber Bay Shores Precinct Plan Final Report

Humber Bay Shores Precinct Plan Final Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Humber Bay Shores Precinct Plan Final Report Date: May 21, 2010 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Etobicoke York Community Council Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke

More information

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative Introduction Mitchell Ranch South is a proposed single family (detached) residential development on

More information

2.7 ac park. TOTAL 5,403 DU 1,297,900 sf 1,105,450 sf 3.87 ac 5,563 DU 1,121,200 sf 1,105,450 sf 3.87 ac

2.7 ac park. TOTAL 5,403 DU 1,297,900 sf 1,105,450 sf 3.87 ac 5,563 DU 1,121,200 sf 1,105,450 sf 3.87 ac PLAN AMENDMENT 2013-I-B1: SEVEN CORNERS SPECIAL STUDY Summary of Pre-staffing Comments Planner: Bernard Suchicital bsuchi@fairfaxcounty.gov (703) 324-1254 Background On October 29, 2013, the Board of Supervisors

More information

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan Implementation 114 9.0 IMPLEMENTATION 9.1 OVERVIEW This chapter summarizes the administrative procedures necessary to implement the proposed land use plan, infrastructure improvements, development standards,

More information

AN INNOVATIVE GREEN REDEVELOPMENT APPROACH. Bruce Greer, P.E. Manager, Environmental Services

AN INNOVATIVE GREEN REDEVELOPMENT APPROACH. Bruce Greer, P.E. Manager, Environmental Services AN INNOVATIVE GREEN REDEVELOPMENT APPROACH Bruce Greer, P.E. Manager, Environmental Services Joseph Shefchek, M.S. Chief Environmental Officer Alliant Energy Corporation www.alliant-energy.com Sonya Newenhouse,

More information

DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.3 STATIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES

DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.3 STATIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.3 STATIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES Parsons P:\Honeywell -SYR\444576 2008 Capping\09 Reports\9.3 December 2009_Capping and

More information

East Panorama Ridge Concept Plan Amendment

East Panorama Ridge Concept Plan Amendment Page 1 of 7 L003 : East Panorama Ridge Concept Plan Amendment Corporate NO: L003 Report COUNCIL DATE: March 4, 2002 REGULAR COUNCIL LAND USE TO: Mayor & Council DATE: February 27, 2002 FROM: General Manager,

More information

Request Modification of Conditions of a Conditional Use Permit approved October 14, Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Stephen White

Request Modification of Conditions of a Conditional Use Permit approved October 14, Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Stephen White Applicant Property Owner Public Hearing September 13, 2017 City Council Election District Lynnhaven Agenda Item 3 Request Modification of Conditions of a Conditional Use Permit approved October 14, 2003.

More information

Example Stormwater Control Plan For a Residential Subdivision Project. Whispering Pines Lane Anytown, USA

Example Stormwater Control Plan For a Residential Subdivision Project. Whispering Pines Lane Anytown, USA Example Stormwater Control Plan For a Residential Subdivision Project Whispering Pines Lane Anytown, USA December 2, 2015 XYZ Corporation Jane Jones, 707-555-1212 This example prepared by Dan Cloak Environmental

More information

Glenside Environmental Services Ltd

Glenside Environmental Services Ltd Unit 18 Great Island Industrial Park, Ballincollig, Co. Cork. Testing Laboratory Registration number: 322T is accredited by the Irish National Board (INAB) to undertake testing as detailed in the Schedule

More information

Chapter 12 HOT WORK OPERATIONS. Purpose:

Chapter 12 HOT WORK OPERATIONS. Purpose: Chapter 12 Hot Work Operations Chapter 12 HOT WORK OPERATIONS Purpose: To provide written procedures to prevent the outbreak of fire, fire alarm activations, and smoke and odor migration in buildings resulting

More information

SECTION PLANTING SOIL for SOIL CELLS. This specification defines material and performance requirements for soils which are to be used

SECTION PLANTING SOIL for SOIL CELLS. This specification defines material and performance requirements for soils which are to be used This specification defines material and performance requirements for soils which are to be used within the Silva Cell system. The SPECIFICATION EDITOR must select the type of soil appropriate to each particular

More information

TEST REPORT Page 1 of 28. Uçar Oyuncak San.ve Tic.Ltd.Şti.

TEST REPORT Page 1 of 28. Uçar Oyuncak San.ve Tic.Ltd.Şti. TEST REPORT Page 1 of 28 REPORT NUMBER : TURT120014744-REVISED 04 APPLICANT NAME ADDRESS BUYER Uçar Oyuncak San.ve Tic.Ltd.Şti. Hadımköy Ömerli Mah.İstanbul Yolu Cad. No:195 Arnavutköy İstanbul TÜRKİYE

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Fred Rodgers Magnet Academy 501 College Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Fred Rodgers Magnet Academy 501 College Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 501 College Avenue Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 16, 2018 thru May 18, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

Project Name: MELWOOD HOTEL. Date Accepted: 1/12/04. Waived. Planning Board Action Limit: Plan Acreage: 1.7 Zone: Dwelling Units:

Project Name: MELWOOD HOTEL. Date Accepted: 1/12/04. Waived. Planning Board Action Limit: Plan Acreage: 1.7 Zone: Dwelling Units: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.

More information

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001 City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES... LIST OF FIGURES... INDEX... OVERVIEW...

More information

ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES

ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES PURPOSE This section contains guidelines and policies which outline a process and define a set of criteria to be used to identify sites for development of facilities classified

More information

DRAFT NFPA 805 TRANSITION PILOT PLANT OBSERVATION GUIDANCE

DRAFT NFPA 805 TRANSITION PILOT PLANT OBSERVATION GUIDANCE Revision D January 14, 2005 DRAFT NFPA 805 TRANSITION PILOT PLANT OBSERVATION GUIDANCE I. INTRODUCTION The Commission s requirements for fire protection of nuclear power plants allow licensees to voluntarily

More information

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018 Page 1 of 19 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This application proposes redesignating two parcels in the community of Silver Springs from Special Purpose Future Urban Development (S-FUD) District and undesignated road

More information

June 22, 2018 Project No /2100

June 22, 2018 Project No /2100 June 22, 2018 Project No. /2100 Riotrin Properties (Gloucester 3) Inc. c/o Riocan Management Inc. Riocan Yonge Eglinton Centre 2300 Yonge Street, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario M4P 1E3 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL

More information

ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (SWMP)

ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (SWMP) ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (SWMP) 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) for Rogue Valley Sewer Services (RVS) has been developed to meet the Municipal

More information

2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 AUTHORITY 2.2 PURPOSE AND INTENT 2.3 SITE LOCATION

2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 AUTHORITY 2.2 PURPOSE AND INTENT 2.3 SITE LOCATION 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 AUTHORITY The City of Gardena initiated and prepared the Artesia Corridor Specific Plan pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code, Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article

More information

Multnomah Education Service District

Multnomah Education Service District Cascade Radon, Inc. 12839 NE Airport Way Bldg.9 Testing, Mitigation, Portland, Oregon 97230 Systems Design Phone: (503) 421-4813 CCB 180537 / CASCARI927C1 Fax: (503) 281-6170 Office@CascadeRadon.com Radon

More information

PRESENTED: April 15, 2008 FILE: DP No. 273/ Development Permit No Government Road Townhomes

PRESENTED: April 15, 2008 FILE: DP No. 273/ Development Permit No Government Road Townhomes DISTRICT OF SQUAMISH REPORT TO: Council FOR: Regular PRESENTED: April 15, 2008 FILE: DP No. 273/2007-26 FROM: SUBJECT: Planning Department Development Permit No. 273 40126 Government Road Townhomes Recommendation

More information

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans The Stormwater Site Plan is the comprehensive report containing all of the technical information and analysis necessary for the City to evaluate a proposed

More information

C ity of Grande Prairie Development Services Department

C ity of Grande Prairie Development Services Department C ity of Grande Prairie Development Services Department FAIRWAY DEVELOPMENT OUTLINE PLAN OP 08 09 Approved April 6, 2009 Prepared by: Focus Corporation Table of Contents 1.0. Introduction 2 3 1.1. Plan

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Fire Extinguisher Version 2.2 Certification Criteria

Fire Extinguisher Version 2.2 Certification Criteria Eco Mark Product Category No.127 Fire Extinguisher Version 2.2 Certification Criteria Applicable Scope Of products corresponding to the ministerial ordinance prescribing technical standards of fire extinguishers

More information

IYRS School of Technology & Trades RCRA CONTINGENCY PLAN Bristol Facility 40 CFR 265 Subpart D 29 CFR Emergency Evacuation

IYRS School of Technology & Trades RCRA CONTINGENCY PLAN Bristol Facility 40 CFR 265 Subpart D 29 CFR Emergency Evacuation International Yacht Restoration School 253 Franklin Street Bristol, RI 02809 RCRA Environmental Compliance Version 1.0 July 2015 IYRS School of Technology & Trades RCRA CONTINGENCY PLAN Bristol Facility

More information

Understanding Your Virginia Soil Test Report

Understanding Your Virginia Soil Test Report Understanding Your Virginia Soil Test Report By Gil Medeiros, Fairfax Master Gardener Don t guess; soil test! As master gardeners, we frequently exhort gardeners to do the test, but we are not so helpful

More information

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION Illinois Route 60/83 IL 176 to the intersection of IL 60 (Townline Road) Lake County P-91-084-07 Mundelein Park and Recreation District Project Limit SECTION 4(f)

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018 DATE: June 7, 2018 SUBJECT: Z-2604-18-1 Rezoning from R-6 and R-5 Single Family Residential Districts to S-3A Special District

More information

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF Meeting Date: October 25, 2011 Agenda Item: Community Development Department Planning Division P. O. Box 151560, San Rafael, CA 94915-1560 PHONE: (415) 485-3085/FAX: (415) 485-3184 Case Numbers:

More information

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE REDEVELOPMENT OPEN HOUSE. MacPherson Room, 10 am 5 pm

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE REDEVELOPMENT OPEN HOUSE. MacPherson Room, 10 am 5 pm MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE REDEVELOPMENT OPEN HOUSE MacPherson Room, 10 am 5 pm MOUNTAIN VIEW SCHOOL SITE REDEVELOPMENT 1 WELCOME TO THE OPEN HOUSE FOR THE MOUNTAIN VIEW SCHOOL SITE WHY WE ARE

More information

Staff Report. Conditional Use PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission

Staff Report. Conditional Use PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT To: From: Salt Lake City Planning Commission Maryann Pickering, Principal Planner (801) 535-7660 Date: December 10, 2014 Re: Church of Scientology

More information

High Carbon Wood Fly Ash as a Biochar Soil Amendment

High Carbon Wood Fly Ash as a Biochar Soil Amendment High Carbon Wood Fly Ash as a Biochar Soil Amendment Preliminary Assessment Completed by Northern Tilth June 2010 Executive Summary Resource Management, Inc. (RMI) recycles wood ash from biomass plants

More information

TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 12, The Planning and Development Department and the Engineering Department recommend that Council:

TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 12, The Planning and Development Department and the Engineering Department recommend that Council: CORPORATE REPORT NO: R080 COUNCIL DATE: April 12, 2010 REGULAR COUNCIL TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 12, 2010 FROM: SUBJECT: General Manager, Planning and Development General Manager, Engineering Neighbourhood

More information

APPENDIX 112D. PERCHLOROETHYLENE DRY CLEANING NESHAP (40 CFR 63 Subpart M) CAA SECTION 112 NESHAP

APPENDIX 112D. PERCHLOROETHYLENE DRY CLEANING NESHAP (40 CFR 63 Subpart M) CAA SECTION 112 NESHAP APPENDIX 112D PERCHLOROETHYLENE DRY CLEANING NESHAP (40 CFR 63 Subpart M) CAA SECTION 112 NESHAP Synopsis: Perchloroethylene (PCE) Drycleaning NESHAP Revised 1/24/97 CFR Location: 40 CFR 63 Subpart M Regulatory

More information

York L. Phillips, AICP, Planning & Zoning Division Manager. APPLICANT: Carter Engineering Consultants, agent for Cordell Enterprises, owner.

York L. Phillips, AICP, Planning & Zoning Division Manager. APPLICANT: Carter Engineering Consultants, agent for Cordell Enterprises, owner. GLYNN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEMO TO: Glynn County Islands Planning Commission 701 G Street Brunswick, Georgia 31520 Phone: (912) 554-7400 Fax: (912) 554-7596 FROM: SUBJECT: York L. Phillips, AICP,

More information

NON-PRIORITY PROJECT WATER QUALITY PLAN (NPP)

NON-PRIORITY PROJECT WATER QUALITY PLAN (NPP) NON-PRIORITY PROJECT WATER QUALITY PLAN (NPP) For: (Insert Project Name) (Site Address or Tract/Lot Number) Prepared for: (Insert Owner/Developer Name) (Insert Address) (Insert City, State, ZIP) (Insert

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 21A.46.120 Proposal to Create a Localized Alternative Sign Overlay for Library Square Case # 25 April 2012 Planning and Zoning Division Department

More information

that the Town Board of the Town of East Greenbush will hold a public hearing on April 11,

that the Town Board of the Town of East Greenbush will hold a public hearing on April 11, TOWN OF EAST GREENBUSH NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Town Board of the Town of East Greenbush will hold a public hearing on April 11, 2018, at 5:45 p.m. at the East Greenbush Town

More information

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN) Central Permit Center 555 Santa Clara Street Vallejo CA 94590 Business License Building Fire Prevention Planning Public Works 707.648.4310 707.648.4374 707.648.4565 707.648.4326 707.651.7151 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

More information

Town of Clinton. New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council. January Prepared for the Town of Clinton by:

Town of Clinton. New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council. January Prepared for the Town of Clinton by: Clarke Caton Hintz Architecture Planning Landscape Architecture Town of Clinton Module 3: Addendum 100 Barrack Street Trenton NJ 08608 clarkecatonhintz.com Tel: 609 883 8383 Fax: 609 883 4044 New Jersey

More information

Memorandum. Introduction

Memorandum. Introduction 5670 Greenwood Plaza Blvd Suite 540 Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 PH 720.509.8901 www.geosyntec.com Memorandum Date: November 1, 2017 To: CC: From: Kelly Weidenbach, Natrona County Health Department

More information

Leadership This is currently a multi-disciplinary effort, led by the following students:

Leadership This is currently a multi-disciplinary effort, led by the following students: To: CSF Committee From: Patrick Green, HSS RE: Feasibility Report: Considerations for Stormwater Remediation Using the Campus Sustainability Fund Winter Quarter Draft Date: February 21, 2012 This report

More information

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT PROPOSAL: Planning Report Date: September 14, 2009 OCP Amendment Temporary Industrial Use Permit in order to allow the outdoor storage of construction waste

More information