TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Background
|
|
- Lesley Harmon
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Long Range Planning Committee and Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission Kellie Brown and Margaret Rhodes, Planning Division, CPHD DATE: June 8, 2017 Courthouse Square Implementation (GLUP, MTP, and Zoning Ordinance Amendments) The purpose of the upcoming LRPC/ZOCO public process is to review proposed General Land Use Plan (GLUP), Master Transportation Plan (MTP), and Zoning Ordinance amendments associated with the implementation of the Courthouse Sector Plan Addendum: Courthouse Square (Courthouse Square Plan or Plan). Background On September 21 st, 2015 the County Board adopted the Courthouse Square Plan. The Plan serves as the guiding long range planning document for the Courthouse Square Study Area. The Plan is organized to provide a list of Priority Concept Plan Recommendations, a Plan Vision, Guiding Principles, and five chapters of recommendations on the topics of Sustainability, Circulation, Open Space, Buildings, and Cultural Resources. These chapters are followed by Urban Design Guidelines addressing a general framework, circulation, building frontages and streetscapes, building stepbacks, and public spaces. The Plan concludes with a chart providing implementation guidance and several appendices. The implementation guidance in the Courthouse Square Plan outlines several short-term action steps to be implemented post-adoption. These action steps include amendments to the General Land Use Plan, Master Transportation Plan, and Zoning Ordinance, which will facilitate the realization of the vision for this area. The following is a summary of the proposed changes. General Land Use Plan Amendments The following is a list of proposed General Land Use Plan (GLUP) amendments. The amendments include creation of a Courthouse Square Special District, as well as amendments proposed to change individual land use designations. While the County typically considers GLUP amendments for individual properties only concurrent with site plan and rezoning applications, in the case of Courthouse Square, all but one of the amendments recommended to align the Plan vision with the Page 1 of 18
2 County s GLUP are on County-owned property where public improvements are envisioned. 1 The proactive approach in this case is thus intended to establish the County s vision for Courthouse Square. Map Amendments (for the front of the GLUP map) - See Attachment A 1. Create the Courthouse Square Special District and add GLUP Note #26 to establish the Courthouse Square Special District. The Courthouse Square Plan calls for creation of a new Courthouse Square Special District to designate areas for which new zoning tools may be applied to achieve the goals set forth in the Courthouse Square Plan (Attachment E). The boundaries for this special district coincide with the boundaries used for the study area during the Courthouse Square planning process and include the Strayer block, the Landmark block, Bell Atlantic Plaza, the Theater Site, Court Square West, and the future Courthouse Square. 2. Amend the GLUP to change the designation of the proposed future Courthouse Square from Government and Community Facilities to Public and add an open space symbol. (Courthouse Square) The Courthouse Square Plan calls for future public open space in this location, which is currently a surface parking lot. The GLUP s current designation as Government and Community Facilities reflects this area s historic land use as the site of the old County Courthouse, County Jail, and Court Tower. Amending the GLUP to change the designation of this area from Government and Community Facilities to Public would update the land use vision for this area. Adding an open space symbol would further emphasize the future open space vision for this location. 3. Amend the GLUP to extend the public ownership cross-hatch on Court Square West and change from Government and Community Facilities to High Office-Apartment- Hotel. (Court Square West) The Courthouse Square Plan calls for development of a new County office building on the Court Square West site. The site is owned by the County and currently houses County administrative offices. The GLUP s current designation as Government and Community Facilities reflects this area s historic land use as the site of the old County Courthouse, County Jail, and Court Tower. Amendments proposed for this site would update the land use vision for this site and also bring the GLUP map into conformance with current ownership of the subject site, recognizing this portion of the Courthouse Square Special District as owned by Arlington County. 1 Note: The Courthouse Square Plan also indicates another proposed amendment for one additional area to High Office-Apartment-Hotel will be necessary to implement the vision. This area is located south of 14 th Street North and west of North Courthouse Road (Bell Atlantic Plaza) currently designated Public. Staff expects to request that the County Board authorize advertisement of this change once a site plan application is submitted so that the GLUP amendment(s) may be considered by the County Board concurrent with the site plan. Page 2 of 18
3 4. Amend the GLUP to a) change the designation of the Theater Site from ½ High Office-Apartment-Hotel, ½ High Residential (western one-third of the Theater site) to High Office-Apartment-Hotel and b) from Government and Community Facilities (eastern twothirds of the Theater site) to High Office-Apartment-Hotel. (Theater Site) The Courthouse Square Plan calls for redevelopment of the Theater Site as a mixed-use building. The Theater Site is owned by the County and currently leased for an AMC movie theater. The GLUP amendments proposed for this site would update the land use vision for this site in conformance with the Plan recommendations. 5. Amend the GLUP to change the designation of Metro Plaza in front of 2100 Clarendon Boulevard from High Office-Apartment-Hotel to Public, remove the slip lane, and extend the public ownership cross-hatch and add an open space symbol. (Metro Plaza) The Courthouse Square Plan calls for future public open space on Metro Plaza. This site is currently a landscaped median (R-O-W) owned by the County. The GLUP amendments proposed for this site would update the land use vision for this site in conformance with the Plan recommendations. The removal of the slip lane and addition of the public ownership cross-hatch would clarify the intent to enhance this site as public open space and recognize this portion of the Courthouse Square Special District as owned by Arlington County. Adding an open space symbol would further emphasize the future open space vision for this location. 6. Amend the GLUP to change the designation of Veitch Terrace on the proposed elevated terrace immediately north of 14 th Street North from public right-of-way to Public and extend the public ownership cross-hatch and add an open space symbol. (Veitch Terrace) The Courthouse Square Plan calls for an elevated public terrace at Veitch Terrace, above North Veitch Street immediately north of 14 th Street North. Veitch Terrace will act as an extension of the Courthouse Plaza and Courthouse Square open space. This site is currently Veitch Street and provides stairway access to Courthouse Plaza and access to the underground garage, which will remain. The GLUP amendments proposed for this site would update the land use vision for this site with the Plan recommendations. Adding an open space symbol would further emphasize the future open space vision for this location. Map Amendments (Back of the GLUP map) - See Attachment B 1. Amend the GLUP to update Major Planning Corridors on the back of the GLUP map for Courthouse. The reverse side of the GLUP shows larger scale versions of the GLUP for each of the three Major Planning Corridors. The GLUP also includes a box with basic information and highlights for the areas within these corridors. The box for Courthouse would be updated to add the Courthouse Square Plan to the list of plans for Courthouse, update the Plan Features to include key recommendations from the Courthouse Square Plan, and add the Courthouse Square Special District to the list of Special Districts. Page 3 of 18
4 Booklet Amendments See Attachment C 1. Add text to the GLUP Booklet regarding the new District/planning area. Under Special Planning Areas in the GLUP Booklet, language is proposed to be added to the section on Courthouse to identify the date of adoption of the Courthouse Special District and to provide the purpose of the District as a tool to implement the goals, priorities, and recommendations set forth in the Courthouse Square Plan. Master Transportation Plan Amendments (See Attachment D) The Master Transportation Plan (MTP) promotes effective travel and accessibility for the County s residents, workers and visitors; provides a policy framework to guide the development of projects and programs; advances the County s goals and objectives; and helps direct infrastructure investment. The following list reflects the proposed amendments to the MTP Map related to the implementation of the Courthouse Square Plan. The proposed amendments would ensure consistency between the MTP and the sector plan regarding the future transportation infrastructure and conditions envisioned for circulation in the Courthouse Square District. Metrorail Station Entrance Amend the MTP Map to designate a Metrorail station entrance at this location. 15 th Street North Amend the MTP Map to designate 15 th Street North between Clarendon Boulevard and North Courthouse Road as a Shared Street. 14 th Street North Amend the MTP Map to designate 14 th Street North between North Uhle Street and North Courthouse Road as a Shared Street. North Uhle Street Amend the MTP Map to add a new section of North Uhle Street between 15 th Street North and the existing segment of North Uhle Street north of Court Square West. This street would be designated as a Pedestrian Priority Street. North Uhle Street Amend the MTP Map to designate the existing sections of North Uhle Street between Clarendon Boulevard and 14 th Street North as a Pedestrian Priority Street. In the Courthouse Square Plan, North Uhle Street between Clarendon Boulevard and 15 th Street North is identified as The Promenade-North, and between 15 th Street North and 14 th Street North as The Promenade-South. Delete from the MTP Map the segment of North Uhle Street located on the north side of Court Square West and the segment of North Veitch Street located on the west side of Court Square West. Zoning Ordinance Amendments Conceptual Zoning Approach The Courthouse Square Plan, under Proposed GLUP Amendments, calls for the creation of a new Courthouse Square Special District for which new zoning tools will be available to achieve the vision for Courthouse Square (Courthouse Square Plan, p. 175). Page 4 of 18
5 In summary, the proposed approach is as follows: Amend the C-O zoning district to allow for application of special provisions within the newly created Courthouse Square Special District as identified on the General Land Use Plan. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to indicate that access to the Courthouse Square Special District provisions can be granted in exchange for furtherance of the Courthouse Square Plan Priority Concept Plan Recommendations. The following text details existing regulations governing development opportunities in Courthouse Square, a summary of the recommendations from the Courthouse Square Plan to amend the Zoning Ordinance, and the detailed proposed approach for amendments that will align with the vision in the Courthouse Square Plan. Adopted C-O Zoning District Provisions The majority of the land area within the Courthouse Square Study Area is located within the C-O zoning district, one of the zoning districts consistent with the High Office-Apartment-Hotel GLUP designation and also consistent with the Courthouse Square Plan vision and recommendations. One exception is the Landmark Block, which is zoned C-3, yet is designated High Office-Apartment-Hotel on the GLUP and therefore eligible for C-O zoning (Courthouse Square Plan, p. 36). As provided in the Zoning Ordinance, The purpose of the C-O, Commercial Office Building, Hotel and Multiple-family Dwelling District is to provide for limited office building land use, and under appropriate conditions, to encourage rebuilding with high-rise office buildings, hotels, or multiple-family dwellings in the vicinity of Metrorail stations. Determination as to the appropriate mixtures of uses and densities shall be based on the General Land Use Plan designation or approved plans for the area, characteristics of individual sites and the need for community facilities, open space and landscaped area, circulation and utilities. (Section ) The C-O zoning district allows for height and density as provided in the tables below: A. By-right Development allowed by-right in the C-O district shall comply with the following standards, except as otherwise expressly allowed or stated. Type of Standard One-family Dwellings All Other Uses Lot area, minimum (sq. ft.) 6,000 20,000 Lot width, minimum average 60 (feet) 100 Height, maximum (feet) Floor area ratio, maximum Site area up to 9, Site area 10,000 to 19, Site area 20,000 and above B. Special exception Development allowed by special exception in the C-O district shall comply with the following standards, except as otherwise approved by the County Board. Page 5 of 18
6 Type of Standard Office, Commercial Multiplefamily Hotel Lot area, minimum (sq. ft.) 30,000 30,000 30,000 Lot width, average (feet) Height, maximum, including mechanical penthouse and parapet walls (feet) Floor area ratio, maximum While the purpose of the C-O zoning district aligns with the vision for Courthouse Square, staff is proposing that this zoning district be amended to incorporate a specific tool that would allow for full implementation of the Plan as detailed in the recommendations from the Courthouse Square that follow. Recommendations in the Courthouse Square Plan to amend the Zoning Ordinance are as follows: Community Features and Amenities: One of the distinguishing components of the Courthouse Square Plan is the Priority Concept Plan Recommendations, which identify ten significant community features (Courthouse Square Plan, p ). Apart from redevelopment of the public and private sites indicated in the Plan, construction of these features, which include the parking garage, Courthouse Square, and other public open spaces, are critical to the full realization of the Plan Vision. Staff proposes that the Zoning approach should provide strategies to support completion of these community features and amenities so that the Plan vision can be fully realized. Building Height: The Buildings chapter of the Courthouse Square Plan provides recommendations for building use, height, and locations. The Building Use, Height, and Locations Plan provides for maximum building height recommendations, which are based on an analysis of existing building heights, shadow studies, impacts on open space, and minimizing visual impacts as viewed from the National Mall (Courthouse Square Plan, p ). Recommended building heights in some locations exceed the height maximums provided for in the C-O zoning district (153 and 180 feet for office/hotel and residential, respectively). In addition, a few sites could accommodate additional density within the heights recommended in the Plan. Staff proposes that Zoning Ordinance amendments should consider opportunities for additional height and density in the Courthouse Square Special District. Proposed Amendment: Incorporate the heights map into the Courthouse Square zoning to show the maximum heights for each property (accounting for the alternatives shown in the Plan) as the cap on additional height that applicants may pursue; the County Board would not have authority to approve modifications to these heights; Add a provision to address the fact that C-O height limits are inclusive of penthouse height, whereas the Plan calls for heights that are exclusive of penthouse height. Building Stepbacks: The Urban Design Guidelines in the Plan include provisions for building stepbacks. The Plan states that new development at Courthouse Square should adhere to the indicated heights and stepbacks (Courthouse Square Plan, p. 67). In addition, the Plan states that Where a maximum height is indicated, it is not intended to include penthouses, elevator overruns, and other rooftop appurtenances. Where heights are shown at stepbacks, this is Page 6 of 18
7 intended to be approximate (Courthouse Square Plan, p. 67) and the stepbacks in the Plan specify depth, in addition to height. The C-O zoning district provisions do not include regulations for stepbacks. Zoning Ordinance amendments should therefore address the Plan s policy direction for stepback adherence. In addition, a provision should also be considered to address the fact that C-O height limits are inclusive of penthouse height, whereas the Plan calls for heights that are exclusive of penthouse height. Proposed Amendment: Refer to the stepbacks shown in the Courthouse Square Plan within the zoning to call attention to the stepbacks and podium height recommendations in the plan, while providing the County Board authority to modify the specific stepbacks and podium height. Bonus Density and Transfer of Development Rights: Site plan projects in various zoning districts, including the C-O zoning district, may take advantage of bonus provisions available through the Zoning Ordinance, specifically additional density in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the district, transfer of development rights for purposes of, among others, open space, historic preservation, affordable housing, community recreation, and/or community facilities, and additional height and density above the GLUP in exchange for provision of affordable housing units or contributions to required community facilities (Sections and ). Staff evaluated scenarios related to the application of these bonus provisions to the private redevelopment sites in Courthouse Square. The building concepts envisioned by the Plan can accommodate more density than can be achieved through traditional bonus mechanisms, such as affordable housing and community facility contributions. In addition, it was recognized that these bonus provisions do not necessarily provide for contributions to the specific community features and amenities called for in the Plan s Priority Concept Plan Recommendations and could potentially divert contributions away from the Plan s Priority Concept Plan Recommendations in furtherance of other County goals. This is not to say that community features and amenities other than those enumerated in the Priority Concept Plan Recommendations are precluded or undesired, but that the Priority Concept Plan Recommendations, which will help to realize the specific vision for Courthouse Square, are indeed the priority. Staff considered various approaches that have been used in the County to achieve the specific goals, heights and stepbacks recommended in other adopted County plans. Over the years, there have been several different ways that plans have been codified. No maps were codified for the Zoning designed to implement some plans, such as the Rosslyn to Courthouse Urban Design Study, the Fort Myer Heights North Plan and the Rosslyn Sector Plan (2015), while other plans, such as the Crystal City Sector Plan and the Clarendon Sector Plan, had associated amendments that codified several maps. There is a similar diversity in allowing for height modifications, with some plans being implemented with zoning language that allows for no modifications, such as Fort Myer Heights North, some allowing for height above the maximum based on findings, such as the Rosslyn Sector Plan (2015), and some allowing for limited modifications. The guidance of some plans was codified in the form of new zoning districts, such as MU-VS for Virginia Square, while the guidance of other plans was codified within existing Zoning districts. Page 7 of 18
8 After careful evaluation, an earn up to approach, such as that used for C-O Crystal City, was found to be a suitable model for new provisions within the existing C-O district to implement the vision for the Courthouse Square Special District. In this approach, the maximum building heights are referenced as the heights up to which the County Board may consider and approve as part of a site plan. For C-O Crystal City, height maps were codified in the Zoning Ordinance and limited modifications were permitted. The similar codification of the height map for Courthouse Square is a clear way to establish the height maximums. However, while C-O Crystal City allowed for limited height modifications, for Courthouse Square the County Board would only be able to modify height for the provision of exceptional, non-occupiable, architectural features. In keeping with the goal of prioritizing the community features and amenities outlined in the Priority Concept Plan Recommendations, staff also recommends that the Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs), only be permitted for the purpose of sending, not receiving, density. This would ensure that density could not be purchased from other sites, which would allow developers to obtain density without addressing the Priority Concept Plan Recommendations. Excess density could be sold to receiving sites outside of the Courthouse Square Special District, but density could not be purchased through the TDR provisions. Proposed Amendment: Allow applicants in the Courthouse Square Special District to earn up to the additional height recommended in the Plan, as shown on the incorporated map, in exchange for furtherance of the community features and amenities identified in the Priority Concept Plan Recommendations in the Plan. Section a (modifications) would not be applicable for the provision of additional height or density. Section (affordable dwelling units for height and density above the GLUP) would not be applicable for achievement of bonus density. Rather, applicants would earn additional height and density, above that provided under the C-O site plan option and up to the maximum height provided in a new Courthouse Special Planning Area provision in exchange for furtherance of site plan features and amenities identified in the Plan. Provide that Section b (the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) provision) is applicable in the Courthouse Square District only for the purpose of sending density, rather than receiving density. Draft Zoning Ordinance Amendments In the proposed amendments: Text proposed to be added is shown with underline and text proposed to be deleted is shown with strikethrough. Where paragraphs are inserted, all subsequent paragraphs in the Zoning Ordinance will be renumbered and references will be updated accordingly. * * * Page 8 of 18
9 Page 9 of 18
10 Article 7. Commercial/ Mixed Use (C) Districts C-O, Mixed Use District Purpose * * * The purpose of the C-O Mixed-Use District is to provide for limited office building land use, and under appropriate conditions, to encourage rebuilding with high-rise office buildings, hotels, or multiple-family dwellings in the vicinity of Metrorail stations. Determination as to the appropriate mixtures of uses and densities shall be based on the General Land Use Plan designation or approved plans for the area, characteristics of individual sites and the need for community facilities, open space and landscaped area, circulation and utilities. Uses Uses shall be as specified in 7.1. A. By-right Density and dimensional standards Development allowed by-right in the C-O district shall comply with the following standards, except as otherwise expressly allowed or stated. B. Special exception Type of Standard One-family Dwellings All Other Uses Lot area, minimum (sq. ft.) 6,000 20,000 Lot width, minimum average 60 (feet) 100 Height, maximum (feet) Floor area ratio, maximum Site area up to 9, Site area 10,000 to 19, Site area 20,000 and above Development allowed by special exception in the C-O district shall comply with the following standards, except as otherwise approved by the County Board. Type of Standard Office, Commercial Multiplefamily Hotel Lot area, minimum (sq. ft.) 30,000 30,000 30,000 Lot width, average (feet) Height, maximum, including mechanical penthouse and parapet walls (feet) Floor area ratio, maximum C. Bulk, coverage and placement For bulk, coverage and placement requirements not listed in this section see 3.2. Page 10 of 18
11 D. Exceptions 1. Lot area and width The County Board may authorize application for rezoning to the C-O district where a lot or plot having less width or less area is part of a block surrounded by streets and/or buildings that generally comply with the provisions of this section. 2. Western Rosslyn Coordinated Redevelopment District Properties in the area designated as the Western Rosslyn Coordinated Redevelopment District on the General Land Use Plan may be developed in accordance with the regulations of Courthouse Square Special District In considering the approval of a site plan for properties located in the area designated as the Courthouse Square Special District on the General Land Use Plan, the County Board may approve additional density and height above that provided in B where it finds that the development project furthers the goals, policies, and recommendations in the Courthouse Sector Plan Addendum: Courthouse Square, offers certain features, design elements, services, or amenities identified in the Courthouse Square Sector Plan Addendum: Courthouse Square and specifically responds to the Courthouse Square Priority Concept Plan Recommendations, and meets and other special exception criteria of the Zoning Ordinance, subject to the following regulations: (a) Under no circumstances shall the County Board approve height, exclusive of mechanical penthouses, above that shown on the building height and location plan map (Map 1, ), except that non-occupiable, exceptional architectural features may exceed the heights outlined in D.3.a. (b) Unless the County Board finds, in a particular case, that a lesser step-back or no step-back provides a better overall design or a better relationship to the pedestrian realm while still achieving the goals of the Courthouse Sector Plan Addendum: Courthouse Square, building step-backs shall be consistent with the step-backs shown in the Courthouse Sector Plan Addendum: Courthouse Square Building Stepbacks Plan. (c) The provisions of for the approval of additional height and density shall not be applicable in the Courthouse Square District, and under no circumstances shall the provisions of A be used for the approval of additional density or height. (d) Additional density shall not be achieved through transfer of development provisions in B in the Courthouse Square District. District use standards Use standards applicable to specific uses in the C-O district include: A. Office, hotel, multiple-family dwelling and commercial development By site plan approval, any building or group of buildings may have a mix of uses. No portion of the site shall be used more than one time in computing the permitted density. All mechanical penthouse area in excess of that used for elevator, mechanical, or maintenance equipment shall be counted as gross floor area. Page 11 of 18
12 Site development standards The site development standards of Article 13 and Article 14 apply to all development, except as otherwise specified below. A. Parking requirements 1. As specified and regulated in 14.3, except that the following may be approved by site plan: (a) Office, Retail, Service Commercial Space: One off-street parking space for each 530 sq. ft. of gross floor area. (b) Multiple-family Dwelling: One off-street parking space for each dwelling unit. (c) Hotel: 0.7 off-street parking spaces for each guest room and dwelling unit. 2. The above required parking shall be located below grade or within the structure housing the use to which the parking is appurtenant, except as may be allowed in an approved site plan. Page 12 of 18
13 79 Map 1, Building Height and Location Plan Page 13 of 18
14 Attachment A - Proposed GLUP Map (Front) Page 14 of 18
15 Attachment B - Proposed GLUP Map (Back) The following language is proposed to be added to the back of the GLUP map to add the Courthouse Sector Plan Addendum: Courthouse Square to the list of Adopted Plans, update the Plan Features to incorporate new recommendations from the Courthouse Square Plan, and add the Courthouse Square Special District to the list of Special Districts. Courthouse Adopted Plans: Courthouse Sector Plan Addendum, 1993; Rosslyn to Courthouse Urban Design Study (2003); Fort Myer Heights North Plan (2008); Courthouse Sector Plan Addendum: Courthouse Square (2017). Station Area Concept: Arlington County government center surrounded by a balanced mix of high-density residential and office uses. Plan Features: Central place resulting from the concentration of major activity nodes and landmarks (Courthouse Justice Center, farmer's market and County's administrative offices) Court House Plaza as a focal point; result of public/private partnership Courthouse Square as a network of interconnected open spaces to support existing and future programs and events with underground parking New development with ground floor retail fronting on Courthouse Square Cultural facilities such as a performing arts center Symbolic Civic Building south of Courthouse Square Enhanced transit and pedestrian connections including Courthouse Square Promenade, 14 th Street and 15 th Street shared streets, and Metro Plaza Intense residential development High density office district Business and neighborhood conservation Selected infill housing Coordinated urban design and sustainability Special Planning Districts: "Coordinated Preservation and Development District" (Colonial Village); "Special Affordable Housing Protection District" (The Odyssey and North Troy Street Residential); Courthouse Square Special District. Neighborhood Conservation Plan Areas: Lyon Village (Plan accepted 1978); Clarendon- Courthouse (previously Courtlands) (Plan accepted 1988 and updated 2007); Radnor/Fort Myer Heights (Plan accepted 2007). Page 15 of 18
16 Attachment C - Proposed GLUP Booklet The following language is proposed to be added to the GLUP Booklet to outline the purpose and indicate the date of adoption of the Courthouse Square Special District. Courthouse Square Special District On (date), the County Board established the Courthouse Square Special District, which is comprised of approximately 10 acres at the center of the Courthouse Metro Station Area. The purpose of this special district is to provide for new policies and tools to guide and help achieve the goals of the Courthouse Sector Plan Addendum: Courthouse Square, adopted by the County Board on September 21, As expressed in the Courthouse Sector Plan Addendum: Courthouse Square vision and guiding principles, Courthouse Square is envisioned as the civic and cultural heart of Arlington and unified aspirations for this area include: opportunities for entertainment and activities; creation of a community gathering place in Courthouse Square; additional open spaces at Metro Plaza and Veitch Terrace; a premier address for new development; and sustainability, flexibility, and innovation. Within the Courthouse Square Special District, future development in the C-O zoning district may earn greater height and density up to the maximum heights indicated in the Courthouse Sector Plan Addendum: Courthouse Square in exchange for compliance with recommendations of the Courthouse Sector Plan Addendum: Courthouse Square and specifically achieve community features and amenities outlined in the Courthouse Square Plan, namely the Priority Concept Recommendations. The Priority Concept Recommendations for Courthouse Square are as follows: 1. 21st Century Civic Square 2. Central Metro Access 3. Shared Streets 4. Courthouse Square Promenade 5. Symbolic Civic Building - South Square 6. Verizon Plaza Redevelopment 7. County Administration Building 8. Enhanced Pedestrian Connection at North Veitch Street and 14th Street North 9. Cultural and Civic Facilities 10. Sustainability Page 16 of 18
17 Attachment D - Proposed MTP Map Amendments Page 17 of 18
18 Attachment E Excerpt from Courthouse Square Plan Appendix D Page 18 of 18
Courthouse Square Implementation Comment/Response Matrix
Courthouse Square Implementation /Response Matrix 1 Are open space symbols binding? GLUP No, open space symbols are not binding, as the GLUP is a policy instrument illustrating the County s future vision
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting October 15, 2005 DATE: September 28, 2005 SUBJECT: Request to Advertise the adoption of the 2005 Clarendon Sector Plan C. M. RECOMMENDATION:
More informationCourthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study. Courthouse Square Working Group #13 October 15, 2014
Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study Courthouse Square Working Group #13 October 15, 2014 1 Courthouse Square Process Working Group Community Courthouse Square Advisory Groups & Civic Associations
More informationCourthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study Working Group Meeting #11 September 2, 2014
Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study Working Group Meeting #11 September 2, 2014 1 Study Area Courthouse Square DRAFT Design Concepts A B C 3 Public Feedback July 23 Workshop & Online Survey
More informationRosslyn Sector Plan Implementation
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Planning Division #1 Courthouse Plaza, 2100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 700 Arlington, VA 22201 TEL 703.228.3525 FAX 703.228.3543 www.arlingtonva.us
More informationPLANNING IN ARLINGTON. Briefing to Katie Cristol
1 PLANNING IN ARLINGTON Briefing to Katie Cristol Overview 2 Comprehensive Plan - Background Administration of the Comprehensive Plan Review of the Comprehensive Plan Implementation of the Comprehensive
More informationCourthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study
Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study Pedestrian Advisory Committee November 12, 2014 Kris Krider, AICP, Planning Supervisor Center for Urban Design and Research Department of Community Planning,
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of March 20, 2007 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #2 Additional and Revised Information DATE: March 20, 2007 SUBJECT: Request to Advertise Public Hearings
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018 DATE: June 7, 2018 SUBJECT: Z-2604-18-1 Rezoning from R-6 and R-5 Single Family Residential Districts to S-3A Special District
More informationCourthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study. Clarendon / Courthouse Civic Association October 21, 2014
Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study Clarendon / Courthouse Civic Association October 21, 2014 1 Courthouse Square Process Working Group Community Courthouse Square Advisory Groups & Civic Associations
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015 DATE: September 11, 2015 SUBJECTS: Outdoor Café at Citizen Burger Bar A. SP# 418 Site Plan Amendment to modify an approved
More informationSP #94, AREP Rosslyn City Center
SP #94, AREP Rosslyn City Center 1700 & 1810 N. Moore Street Department of Community Planning, Housing, and Development County Board July 15, 2017 1 19 th Street N. Wilson Boulevard Location Rosslyn City
More informationFrom: Sent: To: Subject: Zoning: Landscaping:
From: Bernard H. Berne [mailto:bhberne@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 1:18 AM To: CountyBoard Subject: May 19, 2012 County Board Meeting: Goodyear Site Plan (SP #72-650 N. Glebe Road) and amendment
More informationArlington County Retail Plan
Arlington County Retail Plan Draft April 28, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Arlington will be a community where retail is convenient, appealing, activating and sustainable; that provides interest and authenticity,
More informationCourthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study
Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study Transit Advisory Committee October 14, 2014 Andrew D huyvetter, AICP, Associate Planner Center for Urban Design and Research Department of Community Planning,
More informationCourthouse Square DRAFT Design Concepts
Courthouse Square DRAFT Design Concepts July 16, 2014 Working Group Meeting #10 A B C 1 Concept A Circulation 15 th Street Option for arrival sky lite on pork chop and 15 th Option for closure from Clarendon
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 21, 2012 DATE: July 12, 2012 SUBJECT: SP #416 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to modify condition #6 to eliminate requirement to provide a pedestrian
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 23, 2019 DATE: April 12, 2019 SUBJECT: SP #413 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to permit a fixed bar in a private outdoor café space with associated
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 12, 2014 DATE: April 2, 2014 SUBJECT: to the Arlington County Zoning Ordinance, Article 11.1 "CP-FBC" Columbia Pike Form Based Code
More informationSITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA. Courthouse Plaza 2100 Clarendon Boulevard Cherry and Dogwood Rooms (C&D) Arlington, VA 22201
Page 1 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA DATE: Monday, May 15, 2017 TIME: 8:00 10:00 p.m. PLACE: Courthouse Plaza 2100 Clarendon Boulevard Cherry and Dogwood Rooms (C&D) Arlington, VA 22201 SPRC
More informationCRYSTAL CITY BLOCK PLAN # CCBP- G 1 DRAFT
CRYSTAL CITY BLOCK PLAN # CCBP- G 1 DRAFT BLOCK G (Metro Market Square block) Long Range Planning Committee Meeting January 29, 2018 1 1. Introduction 2 1. LRPC Meeting Purpose Review of proposed Crystal
More informationArlington County. Envision Courthouse Square Planning and Urban Design Study 21 May 2014
Arlington County Envision Courthouse Square Planning and Urban Design Study 21 May 2014 Cooper, Robertson & Partners Architecture, Urban Design with Buro Happold, HR&A, Kimley Horn, Nelson Nygaard, & Tactical
More informationCRYSTAL CITY BLOCK PLAN #CCBP-JK-1
CRYSTAL CITY BLOCK PLAN #CCBP-JK-1 Blocks J-K Adopted September 15, 2012 A R L I N G T O N V I R G I N I A Jefferson Davis Highway/U.S. 1 N Blocks J-K and Vicinity (existing conditions) Note: Block boundary
More informationELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN
ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.0 LOCATION... 2 3.0 EXISTING CONTEXT... 2 4.0 VISION & GUIDING PRINCIPLES... 2 5.0 LAND USE AND BUILT FORM... 4 5.1 St. Laurent
More informationAppendix I ARLINGTON COUNTY SECTOR PLANS SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC SPACES
Appendix I ARLINGTON COUNTY SECTOR PLANS SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS RELATED TO PUBLIC SPACES The County has developed Sector Plans for various planning areas within Arlington County s Metro corridors. Following
More information40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor
40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor A presentation by the Arlington County Department of Community Planning,
More informationARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts
ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts 6-10 Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District 6-10.10 Purpose and Intent The Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District provides
More informationATTACHMENT. To the west, north, and east of the block, primarily singlefamily detached residential patterns, with some townhouses, predominate.
COMMENT / REVISION MATRIX (as of ) for Washington and Kirkwood Special GLUP Study "Plus" and Concept Plan 1 2 Resolve inconsistency between American Legion site area noted in Map 1 1.36 AC 1.29 AC and
More informationArlington County Long Range Planning Committee Meeting
Arlington County Long Range Planning Committee Meeting Preliminary FY2015 Planning Division Work Program A presentation by the Arlington County Department of Community Planning, Housing and Development,
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of March 10, 2012 DATE: February 29, 2012 SUBJECT: SP #197 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to add a new condition #25 to allow a new use for a Yoga and Pilates
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 13, 2015
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 13, 2015 DATE: June 10, 2015 SUBJECT: Request to Authorize Advertisement of Public Hearings by the Planning Commission and the County
More informationDRAFT. October Wheaton. Design Guidelines
October 2011 DRAFT Wheaton Design Guidelines 2 Draft - Design Guidelines - Wheaton Sector Plan Contents 04 Section 1: Introduction 06 Section 2: Context 08 Section 3: Design Guidelines 09 Goal 1: Create
More informationStaff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission
Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission SYNOPSIS / APPLICATION INFORMATION Application Request: Concept review on a legislative application to rezone land located at approximately 1750
More information2.7 ac park. TOTAL 5,403 DU 1,297,900 sf 1,105,450 sf 3.87 ac 5,563 DU 1,121,200 sf 1,105,450 sf 3.87 ac
PLAN AMENDMENT 2013-I-B1: SEVEN CORNERS SPECIAL STUDY Summary of Pre-staffing Comments Planner: Bernard Suchicital bsuchi@fairfaxcounty.gov (703) 324-1254 Background On October 29, 2013, the Board of Supervisors
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019 DATE: February 15, 2019 SUBJECT: Amendment to the Master Transportation Plan (MTP) Map to add a new section of North Kansas
More information40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor
40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor A presentation by the Arlington County Department of Community Planning,
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 21, 2017 DATE: October 2, 2017 SUBJECTS: Request to authorize advertisement of public hearings by the Planning Commission and County
More informationAppendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria
Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria C-1 Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria PURPOSE: The implementation of numerous policies contained within the Master Plan hinges on the creation
More informationCitizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee
Citizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee Area No. 1: Owner desires retail land uses. Area No. 1a: Owner of two small parcels adjacent to Area No. 1 desires retail land
More informationCOURTHOUSE SQUARE PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN STUDY
COURTHOUSE SQUARE PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN STUDY Executive Summary A summary of staff recommendations to guide the Courthouse Sector Plan Addendum update. Draft: December 5, 2014 Contents Study Purpose
More informationPolicies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center
Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center The Town Center Vision is scattered throughout the Comprehensive Plan, development code and the 1994 Town Center Plan. What follows are sections
More informationReview of Opportunity Area C Draft Comprehensive Plan and Draft BOS Follow-On Motions. Special Working Group Meeting March 4, 2015
Review of Opportunity Area C Draft Comprehensive Plan and Draft BOS Follow-On Motions Special Working Group Meeting March 4, 2015 The slides that follow identify where the draft Comprehensive Plan has
More informationEnvision Courthouse Square. Cultural Resources, Circulation, Open Space, & Buildings
Envision Courthouse Square Cultural Resources, Circulation, Open Space, & Buildings May 21, 2014 Envision Courthouse Square Cultural Resources Existing Conditions Historic Preservation Program May 21,
More informationCITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services
CITY OF PUYALLUP Development Services 333 South Meridian Puyallup WA 98371 To: City Council From: Katie Baker, AICP, Planning Division Re: South Hill Neighborhood Plan Adoption Date: (Meeting date: February
More informationPentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3
Pentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3 CPHD April 23, 2015 Meeting Agenda Overview of approved Phase I Site Plan Review of relevant design guidelines Presentation of current proposal
More informationGeneral Land Use Plan
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Adopted August 12, 1961 with Amendments through December 31, 2017 Residential Residential Public Public Mixed Mixed Use Use Commercial Commercial Office-Apt-Hotel AN ELEMENT
More informationORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and
ORDINANCE 17-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA, CREATING ARTICLE XIV OF CHAPTER 118 OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN CODE OF ORDINANCES PROVIDING FOR THE EAST PLANT
More informationSITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA & STAFF REPORT. DATE: Monday, January 9, :00 10:00 p.m. PLACE:
SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA & STAFF REPORT DATE: Monday, January 9, 2017 TIME: 7:00 10:00 p.m. PLACE: 2100 Clarendon Boulevard Courthouse Plaza Room 109/110 (Cherry & Dogwood) Arlington,
More informationBloor St. W. Rezoning - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 1638-1644 Bloor St. W. Rezoning - Preliminary Report Date: April 1, 2008 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council Acting Director, Community
More information13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154
13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154 The Planning and Economic Development Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendations contained
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 24, 2004 DATE: April 14, 2004 SUBJECT: Reprinting of the General Land Use Plan C. M. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the reprinting of the General
More informationCULTURAL RESOURCES AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES PERMEATE
CULTURAL RESOURCES AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES PERMEATE AS RELEVANT, CULTURAL RESOURCE INFLUENCE AND ENHANCEMENT ARE INDICATED BY THIS ICON THROUGHOUT THE PRESENTATION: CR AS RELEVANT, DESIGN PRINCIPLES ARE
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1. BACKGROUND... 3 1.2. THE PROPOSAL... 5 2.0 EXISTING POLICY FRAMEWORK... 5 2.1. PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT (PPS)... 5 2.2. CITY OF LONDON OFFICIAL PLAN (OP)...
More informationPOLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT TUXEDO PARK (WARD 9) CENTRE STREET N AND 26 AVENUE NE BYLAWS 36P2017 AND 234D2017
Page 1 of 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This application proposes to redesignate a single parcel of land in the Community of Tuxedo Park from Commercial Corridor 2 (C-COR2 f1h10) District to Mixed Use Active Frontage
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 17, 2015 DATE: October 6, 2015 SUBJECT: SP #1 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW to modify Zoning Ordinance sign requirements and facade modifications
More informationWheaton CBD & Vicinity Sector Plan D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S
Wheaton CBD & Vicinity Sector Plan D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S 1 a b s t r a c t This document contains the design guidelines the property owners, community members, and planners should use to implement
More informationExecutive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor
Executive Summary NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor Transportation and Land Use Study December 2005 Prepared for: Town of Colonie Capital District Transportation Committee Prepared by: Introduction: Land use decisions
More informationGeneral Land Use Plan (GLUP) Amendments 2001 Present*
General Land Use Plan (GLUP) Amendments 2001 Present* File # Date Action GP-273-01-1 07/31/01 Approved Low O-A-H Public and Amendment to Note 3 George Mason University Foundation Virginia Square GP-274-01-1
More informationThe Village of Shirlington
The Village of Shirlington Suburban Smart Growth Without Rail Transit July 2018 Agenda History (1940 to present) Attributes and Outcomes Lessons Learned Setting the Stage Arlington County Arlington is
More informationArlington, Virginia is a worldclass
EXECUTIVE S U M M A RY Arlington maintains a rich variety of stable neighborhoods, quality schools and enlightened land use policies, and received the Environmental Protection Agency s highest award for
More informationPlanned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )
Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM2014-00139) Standard residential development Planned Development Example: Smaller lot sizes than what is allowed to create open space amenity. What
More information1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village
Report to Planning and Environment Committee To: Chair and Members Planning & Environment Committee From: John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner Subject: Masonville Transit Village
More informationMark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan
Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan Notes: This document is provided for information purposes
More informationHockessin Community Redevelopment Plan
Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan 3.1 Introduction The Community Redevelopment Plan for the Village of Hockessin is the result of the people s vision for a distinct village center that serves as the
More informationSITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Crystal Drive, 11 th Floor Arlington, VA 22202
Page 1 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA DATE: Thursday, October 26, 2017 TIME: 7:00 9:00 p.m. PLACE: 2011 Crystal Drive, 11 th Floor Arlington, VA 22202 SPRC STAFF COORDINATOR: Matt Ladd, 703-228-3525
More informationTown Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)
Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan) Mercer Island Town Center Looking North (2014) In 1994, a year-long process culminated in a set of design guidelines and code requirements for the Town Center
More informationCRYSTAL CITY BLOCK PLAN # CCBP- G 1
CRYSTAL CITY BLOCK PLAN # CCBP- G 1 BLOCK G (Metro Market Square block) Long Range Planning Committee Meeting #3 April 2, 2018 1 1. Tonight s Agenda 1. Introductory Remarks (Jane Siegel) 2. Follow-up from
More informationThe Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN
The Village SPECIFIC PLAN Chapter 3 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3.1.1 Purpose This Chapter describes the development regulations applicable to the Mixed-Use and Transit Center Planning Areas. These form-based regulations
More informationNEC of Central Avenue and Indian School Road
NEC of Central Avenue and Indian School Road For this location, there are two applicable plans that provide guidance on development. The two plans include the Indian School Specific Plan (1991) and the
More informationBe it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new A (Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District) is adopted:
Local Law No. 4 of 2018 (Adoption of 280-18A (Transit Oriented Development District) Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new 280-18A (Transit Oriented Development
More informationSITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Clarendon Boulevard Conference Room 311 Arlington, VA 22201
SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA DATE: Thursday, July 13, 2017 TIME: 7:00 8:30 p.m. PLACE: 2100 Clarendon Boulevard Conference Room 311 Arlington, VA 22201 SPRC STAFF COORDINATOR: TBD Item 1.
More informationDRAFT. Urban Development Areas Fairfax County. UDA Needs Profile: Tysons Corner 13% Location Characteristics. Socio-Economic Characteristics
14 Urban Development Areas Fairfax County UDA Needs Profile: Tysons Corner Tysons Corner is located in Fairfax County, surrounded by the town of McLean to the east and Vienna on the west along I-495, the
More informationALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 18 ZONING SECTION 20A NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL - NMD
CHAPTER 18 ZONING SECTION 20A NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL - NMD Sections: 20A.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT 20A.2 STATUS AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 20A.5 CODES OF DEVELOPMENT 20A.6 PERMITTED USES 20A.7 RESIDENTIAL
More informationDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Planning Division. Arlington County Planning Commission
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Planning Division 2100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 700 Arlington, VA 22201 TEL 703.228.3525 FAX 703.228.3543 www.arlingtonva.us DRAFT TO: FROM:
More informationJohn M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference
Report to Planning and Environment Committee To: From: Subject: Chair and Members Planning & Environment Committee John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner Old East Village Dundas Street
More informationClairtrell Area Context Plan
Clairtrell Area Context Plan March 2005 Urban Development Services City Planning Contents 1. Introduction... 4 2. Development Structure... 6 2.1 Streets... 7 2.1.1 Sheppard Avenue and Bayview Avenue...
More informationWelcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments
Welcome This is an information meeting introducing the applications for proposed redevelopment of the Yorkdale Shopping Centre site at 3401 Dufferin Street and 1 Yorkdale Road over the next 20+ years,
More informationUrban Planning and Land Use
Urban Planning and Land Use 701 North 7 th Street, Room 423 Phone: (913) 573-5750 Kansas City, Kansas 66101 Fax: (913) 573-5796 Email: planninginfo@wycokck.org www.wycokck.org/planning To: From: City Planning
More informationDescription of Preferred Alternative
Chapter 2 Description of Preferred Alternative 2.1 Introduction This chapter of the programmatic Sammamish Town Center Sub-area Plan Final EIS provides a more detailed description of the Preferred Alternative
More informationWorking Group Meeting #7 June 11, 2014
Working Group Meeting #7 June 11, 2014 Community Input The following slides present frequency of input compiled from: Two public workshops Five Working Group meetings Interdepartmental interviews Countywide
More informationPantops Master Plan Update 2018
Pantops Master Plan Update 2018 Focus Area Topic Meeting #1 Land Use & Development Area Boundary North of I-64 February 26, 2018 Pantops Master Plan Update 2018 Focus Area Public Meetings: Kickoff Meeting
More informationDRAFT Subject to Modifications
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 8 From: Date: Subject: Staff May 19, 2017 Council Meeting Florida Department of Transportation Complete Streets
More informationCooper, Robertson & Partners Architecture, Urban Design
Cooper, Robertson & Partners Architecture, Urban Design Date 5/14/14 To Jason Beske From Rob White Copies to Kris Krider Margaret Rhodes Andrew D huyvetter William Kenworthey Earl Jackson Noor Majeed Memorandum
More informationEdward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building
Corporate Report Clerk s Files Originator s Files CD.03.POR DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair and Members of Planning and Development Committee Meeting Date: February 27, 2012 Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner
More informationDENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP
DENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP Urban Design Standards and Guidelines November 17, 2008 Amended February 3, 2016 City and County of Denver CF Property Management, Inc. C/O Denver Design District - Starboard
More informationComplete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool
Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool Prepared By: City of Regina Planning Department October 2014 Page 1 of 14 Community Development Review Checklist for Secondary Plans and Concept Plans The
More informationDescriptive Summary of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Applicant City of Virginia Beach Public Hearing October 12, 2016 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Establishing the Historic Seatack & Vicinity Suburban Focus Area (SFA) in Chapter 1, Section 1.3 Agenda
More informationLAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017
Page 1 of 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Land Use Amendment application seeks to redesignate a full downtown block (currently the YWCA site) from a Direct Control based on the CM-2 District (Land Use Bylaw
More informationREZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to
Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application COMMUNITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REZONING GUIDE Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION* CHECK IF POINT OF CONTACT FOR APPLICATION Property
More information1296 Kennedy Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 1296 Kennedy Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: January 15, 2016 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Scarborough Community Council Acting Director,
More informationJuly 23, 2014 Wilson School. Working Group Meeting #3 Preliminary Site Analysis School Siting Considerations Guiding Principles
July 23, 2014 Wilson School Working Group Meeting #3 Preliminary Site Analysis School Siting Considerations Guiding Principles Agenda Follow-Up from Meeting #2: WG & community feedback Presentations /
More informationDRAFT Land Use Chapter
Stevens Creek Urban Village DRAFT 1 18 17 Land Use Chapter INTRODUCTION This Land Use Chapter describes how the Stevens Creek Urban Village will accommodate the growth that is planned for it in the Envision
More informationA. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?
I. Introduction A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN? A general plan is the planning guideline for the future of a city. It contains goals and policies which regulate urban development, the protection of the natural
More informationEXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Town Center Land Use Element: V. LAND USE POLICIES Town Center Mercer Island's business district vision as described in "Your Mercer Island Citizen-Designed Downtown" was an
More informationAttachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH. Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report
Attachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report July 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background, Policy Framework and the Preparation of Urban Design Reports 1. Introduction
More informationMetro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers
Metro Activity Center Design Guidelines Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers Metro Activity Centers What is a MAC? Legacy, the adopted guide for the future growth
More informationTREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H From: Date: Subject: Staff October 17, 2008 Council Meeting Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review Draft
More informationHISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION APRIL 3, 2012
HISTORIC TOWN CENTER MASTER PLAN CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION APRIL 3, 2012 REQUESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS Certification of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR); and, Approval of General Plan
More information[PLANNING RATIONALE] For Site Plan Control and Lifting of Holding Zone By-Law 101 Champagne Avenue. May 23, 2014
[PLANNING RATIONALE] For Site Plan Control and Lifting of Holding Zone By-Law 101 Champagne Avenue May 23, 2014 Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2 2.0 Site Context... 2 2.1 Adjacent Uses... 2 Figure 1: Site
More information1071 King Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 1071 King Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: August 9, 2012 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council Director,
More information