Lewisville Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 2 & 4, 2017

Similar documents
Joe Pool Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 23, 2017

Canyon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 18, 2016

Public Information Meeting

Lake O the Pines Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting April 25 & 27, 2017

Joe Pool Lake Lake Master Plan Public Information Meeting Presentation of Final Draft Revision July 31, 2018

EAU GALLE PROJECT MASTER PLAN APPENDIX C PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

Raystown Lake Master Plan Revision. Public Meeting April 25 & 26, 2018 How does the revision process work?

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District Prado Basin Project Updates

Pine Flat Lake Master Plan Update FACT SHEET September 2014

Parks and Open Space Preservation and Dedication. January 26, 2016 Fort Worth City Council Pre-Council Meeting Randle Harwood and Richard Zavala

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft Vers

G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT. The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element:

This page intentionally blank.

Yadkin River Greenway Feasibility Study Fact Sheet Village of Clemmons, Town of Lewisville, Town of Bermuda Run

Preface. Erie. Scranton. Allentown. Pittsburgh. Harrisburg. Philadelphia

Chapter 5: Recreation

Master Plan Objectives and Policies

Department of Community Development. Planning and Environmental Review Division Revised Notice of Preparation

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Summary of Changes in the DRAFT Rivers Project Natural Resource Master Plan from the 2001 approved plan to 2014 plan

SCC PRD (2016) COUNTY PARK MASTER PLAN

Welcome. to the Bull Shoals Lake Master Plan Revision Open House

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

San Diego River Coalition 2012 Work Plan

2.4 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Goals, Objectives and Policies

Town of Lyons Parks Flood Recovery Planning Process. Photograph courtesy of Ed Bruder

PARKS AND RECREATION

Elm Fork Land Use. Trinity River Corridor Project Committee May 13, 2013

The City shall enhance and improve the accessibility of parks and recreational facilities while protecting their quality. by:

ADDENDUM TO BIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY REPORT, BOTANICAL SURVEY AND WETLAND DELINEATION

Community Conservation Workshop. Lake Placid

{Best Practices. Summary of Tools, Strategies and Best Practices from 11 Michigan Case Study Communities

Provide and maintain sufficient public parks, recreation facilities, and open space to meet the recreational needs of County residents and visitors.

DISCUSSION TOPIC: ST JOHNS RIVER & ITS TRIBUTARIES (BPII) 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

PARTF Scoring System for Grants

Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

Chapter PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS

CHAPTER 4 FUTURE LAND USE AND URBAN SERVICES DISTRICTS

A. Selma Park, Davis Bay and Wilson Creek

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Westside Creeks Restoration Plan Merit Award AECOM, Fort Collins. Planning & Urban Design

STEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

The Trust for Public Land. in Minnesota

Please read the entire document

City of Missoula and Missoula County Open Space Planning Open House

CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Wisconsin downtown action council Downtown project case study profile

McArthur Swamp Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat MCARTHUR SWAMP PLANNING UNIT

Parks, Trails, and Open space Element

Policy & Procedure Effective Date: Parks Department Page of

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA CHECKLIST OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION

Parks, Trails, and Open Space Element

EL DORADO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT PRINCIPLE INTRODUCTION STATE AUTHORIZATION

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

1. Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Special Use Sites 2. Open Space 3. Trails

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) ; TDD (651)

Central Lake Ontario Conservation Conservation Lands Master Plan

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Pinellas County Greenways

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

Lake Arlington Master Plan. Presented by Randle Harwood, Planning and Development Director October 27, 2015

Map Development 5/15/2012. New Virginia Modeling Tools

STREAM BUFFERS

APPENDIX I Presentations

Support the implementation of Cape Coral's Comprehensive Plan. Protect and utilize the unique natural resources in the City.

CHAPTER 13 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

Sacramento County Regional Parks American River Parkway Group Activity & Special Event Procedures

Arkansas River Corridor

WILLAMETTE FALLS LEGACY PROJECT

Zoning Ordinance Article 3

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

138 ATTACHMENT 17. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WlLMlNGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS

MASTER PLAN TRAINING MODULE 1: INTRODUCTION

Draft Stillwater 2030 Comprehensive Plan- Goals and Policies

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Riparian Buffer on the Bushkill Creek. Policies

Staff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.

Enhance the High Line Canal Projects

Green Infrastructure Policies and Ordinances

PARKS. Chapter Introduction

LAND USE MANAGEMENT PLAN ARTICLE

APPENDIX A 6 CONCEPTUAL PRELIMINARY PLAN GUIDE AND CHECKLIST FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS CARRBORO DEVELOPMENT GUIDE APPENDIX A

Las Colonias Park Master Plan

Portage County Parks, Trails and Greenways Plan

Rogue River Recreation and Access Management Plan- Table Rocks Reach. Jackson County, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, National Park Service

Study Area Map. Wasatch Hollow Open Space Restoration, Use, & Management Plan. Legend. Harrison Ave East. Roosevelt East.

OFFICIAL PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH

SALISBURY TOMORROW Our Vision

Mark Greenig Recreation and Land Use Planner CH2M Hill

CHAPTER 1 Introduction

3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.

Ottawa County Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. February, 2006

TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM STRATEGY APPENDIX F: MODEL POLICIES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TARGET TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM

Tāhuhu whakaruruhau ā-taone The sheltering ridge pole

Appendices. Contents. Appendices - Sep 1997 CP-1 AP-1

Silverwood Masterplan Kickoff Meeting. Jim Neidhart Dane County Parks Planning

Transcription:

Lewisville Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 2 & 4, 2017 Presented By Rob Jordan Lake Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District US Army Corps of Engineers

Purpose of this Meeting Describe Purpose of Master Plan Describe the Revision Process Answer Questions Seek Your Participation & Input Explain Why Revision is Needed

The Corps Vision for Lewisville Lake The land, water surface and recreational resources of Lewisville Lake will be managed to protect, conserve, and sustain natural and cultural resources, especially environmentally sensitive resources, and provide outdoor recreation opportunities that complement overall project purposes for the benefit of present and future generations.

Purpose of Master Plans The Corps defines a Master Plan as The strategic land use management document that guides the comprehensive management and development of all project recreational, natural and cultural resources throughout the life of the water resource development project. Source: Chapter 3 of EP 1130-2-550 available at www.usace.army.mil/library/publications

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Applies to federal actions that affect the environment such as Master Plan revisions Requires federal agencies to CONSIDER and DOCUMENT the environmental impacts of their proposed actions as part of an agency s OVERALL planning and decision-making Requires federal agencies to cooperate with other federal, state and local governments as well as with organizations and citizens during project planning Scoping is where the federal agency asks for initial input from other agencies, citizens and organizations regarding project area, resources and uses

Key Points Regarding Master Plans Main focus is stewardship of natural and cultural resources and operation of quality outdoor recreation areas Proposed effective life of a Master Plan is 25 years Recreational use of the water surface is addressed

Additional Key Points Key sections of the Master Plan Revision include resource management objectives revised land use classifications management plan for each land classification Potential outcomes could be designation of lands for utility corridors, environmentally sensitive areas Protection of environmentally sensitive areas is given priority

What Master Plans Are Not Master Plans do not address in detail the technical aspects of Regional water quality Water management for flood risk management, Water supply or water level management Shoreline management

What Will Not be Addressed National policy places strict limitations on the proposed construction of new public roads on Corps lands. With few exceptions road proposals that would cross federal land will not be addressed. Shoreline policy governing mowing, removal of vegetation and debris as well as pedestrian paths will not be addressed in the Master Plan.

Stakeholders Stakeholder input is very important to the process. They include: The general public Surrounding cities Agencies that manage lands and resources, such as State and Federal wildlife agencies Concessionaires Tribes Historical and Cultural Societies Visitors and residents of the Lake

What About Drought/Flood? Master Plans cannot change how water in the lake is managed addressed in separate Water Control Plan Natural resources and recreation management must be implemented within the constraints of the primary missions of flood risk management and water supply

Why Revise the Lewisville Lake Master Plan? Current Master Plan is dated June 1985 and has exceeded its useful life. A major supplement to the Master Plan was completed in May 2004. Given the rapid pace of development and population growth surrounding the lake it is time to take a fresh look at the way the lake is managed. Land classifications were updated in the May 2004 Supplement, but area development, particularly on the east side of the lake indicates a need to examine how lands are currently classified.

Lewisville Lake Missions Flood Risk Management a primary mission Water Supply a primary mission Environmental Stewardship an inherent mission Recreation a secondary mission

Fast Facts about Lewisville Lake Created by the construction of Lewisville Dam in 1955. The lake created by the dam included the entire water surface of the former Lake Dallas which resulted from construction of the Garza Dam by the City of Dallas in the 1920s. The main body of Lewisville Lake is 62 years old but the old Lake Dallas portion of Lewisville Lake is approaching 100 years old! Provides water supply storage primarily for Dallas, Lewisville and Denton. The Upper Trinity Water District supplies water to numerous other cities. At conservation (normal) pool elevation 522.0 NGVD the lake covers 29,592 At the flood control pool elevation 532.0 NGVD the lake covers 39,168 acres

Fast Facts about Lewisville Lake Highly urbanized lake bordered by 15 incorporated cities/towns Served by five full service marinas Excellent park areas operated by USACE and through lease agreements with cities of Lewisville, Highland Village, Hickory Creek, Lake Dallas, Little Elm and The Colony Popular natural areas at LLELA and City of Denton s Clear Creek Natural Heritage Center Includes Hwy 380 Access point to the Ray Roberts Greenbelt Trails operated by TPWD Largest expanse of public open/green space in Denton County

Master Plan Revision Process Accomplished by a team of Corps employees with input from other agencies Public and stakeholder input will be carefully considered An Environmental Assessment of the Master Plan will be prepared and included as an appendix

The Master Planning Process Data Collection Agency/Public Scoping 2 & 4 May 2017 Resource Analysis Development of Land Classifications and Resource Objectives Agency/Public Review Finalize Master Plan Based on Comments Received Adoption of Master Plan Revision Where we are today

Possible Changes Needed in the Current Master Plan Re-examine the classification of project lands and the water surface Portions of currently designated parks and even non-park areas could be reclassified as environmentally sensitive areas Examine existing utility corridors for possible changes Prepare New Resource Management Objectives Updates to existing park development plans Possible changes to boating capacity which will be contingent on the completion of a new Boating Use Study

Additional Changes Prepare new Resource Objectives Need current recreation objectives that reflect recreational use trends identified by 2012 Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan (by TPWD) and through public and stakeholder input Need current natural resource objectives that reflect habitat and open space needs identified in the 2012 Texas Conservation Action Plan (by TPWD) and public input and stakeholder input

Lewisville Lake Land Classification Current Land Classifications Proposed New Land Classifications Project Operations Recreation Project Operations High Density Recreation Environmentally Sensitive Areas Wildlife Management Environmentally Sensitive Areas Multiple Resource Management -Low Density Recreation -Wildlife Management -Vegetation Management -Future/Inactive Recreation Conservation Easements Water Surface - Restricted Conservation Easements (no change anticipated) Water Surface - Open Recreation - Designated No Wake - F & W Sanctuary - Restricted

BUILDING STRONG

Land Classification Project Operations High Density Recreation Multiple Resource Management Environmentally Sensitive Areas Easement Lands Definition Those lands required for the dam, operations center, office, maintenance compound and other areas that are used solely for project operations Land developed for intensive recreational activities by the visiting public, including developed recreation areas and areas for marinas and related concessions, and resorts Recreation Low Density: Activities such as hiking, primitive camping, wildlife observation, and hunting Wildlife Management General: Fish and wildlife management activities Vegetative Management: Management activities for the protection and development of a specific vegetative cover Inactive and/or Future Recreation Areas: Recreation areas planned for the future or that have been temporarily closed Areas where scientific, ecological, cultural or aesthetic features have been identified. These areas must be considered by management to ensure they are not adversely impacted All land for which USACE holds an easement interest but not fee title. Planned use and management of easement lands will be in strict accordance with the terms and conditions of the easement estate acquired for the project Definitions from USACE Engineer Pamphlet 1130-2-550: Recreation Operations and Maintenance Guidance and Procedures

Water Surface Classification Restricted Designated No-Wake Fish and Wildlife Sanctuary Open Recreation Definition Water areas restricted for project operations, safety, and security purposes To protect environmentally sensitive shoreline areas, recreational water access areas from disturbance, and for public safety Annual or seasonal restrictions on areas to protect fish and wildlife species during periods of migration, resting, feeding, nesting, and/or spawning Those waters available for year round or seasonal water-based recreational use Definitions from USACE Engineer Pamphlet 1130-2-550: Recreation Operations and Maintenance Guidance and Procedures

Land Classifications Project Operations - This category includes those lands required for the dam and spillway, levees, dikes, offices, maintenance facilities, and other areas that are used solely for the operation of the project Insert Image of dam

Land Classifications High Density Recreation - Lands developed for intensive recreational activities for the visiting public such as day use parks, campgrounds as well as concessions like marinas and resorts. Insert image of HDR @ LE

Land Classifications Environmentally Sensitive Areas - Areas where scientific, ecological, cultural or aesthetic features have been identified. Designation of these lands is not limited to just lands that are otherwise protected by laws such as the Endangered Species Act, the National Historic Preservation Act or applicable State statutes. These areas must be considered by management to ensure they are not adversely impacted. Examples may include mature bottomland forests, river and stream corridors, scenic bluffs, and native prairie. Insert image of ESA @ LE

Land Classifications Low Density Recreation - Lands with minimal development or infrastructure that support passive public recreational use (e.g. primitive camping, fishing, hunting, trails, wildlife viewing, etc.)

Land Classifications Wildlife Management - Lands designated for stewardship of fish and wildlife resources

Land Classifications Vegetative Management - Lands designated for stewardship of forest, prairie, and other native vegetative cover

Water Classifications Water Surface- Restricted Water Surface-Designated No Wake Insert images Water Surface-Fish and Wildlife Sanctuary Water Surface- Open Recreation Designated Beaches are Restricted Water Surface

Utility Corridors Linear strips of federal land used for consolidation of multiple utility lines Establish only where no viable alternative to crossing Federal land exists Main purpose is to reduce negative environmental Impacts Generally follow existing roads or utility lines Examples of Existing Corridors at Lewisville Lake

Recreation Objective: Potential Resource Objectives Expand existing trails and create new trails for a variety of users Extend key boat ramps to accommodate low lake levels Leasing Corps operated parks to other entities Adjustment to the lake s boating capacity Natural Resource Objective: Restore degraded prairie sites to support a diversity of native grasses and forbs Implement invasive species control programs Identify and protect environmentally sensitive areas Refine wildlife management programs General Objective: Reduce encroachments and trespass through improved boundary marking and surveillance

Attend Meetings Visit our website at: http://www.swf.usace.army.mil/about/lakes-and- Recreation-Information/Master-Plan-Updates Send us an e-mail: Use the comment form provided Visit with Corps personnel Tell your friends How Can I Participate? Fill out a comment card now or take it home and send later (30 days)

Master Plan Next Steps Typical lake master plan update will take 24-36 months to finalize. Lewisville Lake Master Plan revision is in the early stage of development First 30 day public comment 5 May thru 5 June 2017 Draft MP / EA public meeting in Summer/Fall of 2018, followed by another 30 day Public/Agency comment period Final document: 6-8 months (Winter 2018-2019)

The End Please feel free to visit with staff members, view the maps, ask questions and help us produce an excellent Master Plan Insert image