TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Technical Committee on Internal Combustion Engines R. P. Benedetti DATE: August 17, 2016 SUBJECT: Agenda for NFPA 37 Second Draft Meeting Tuesday, September 20, 2016 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Wednesday, September 21, 2016 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Ladies and Gentlemen: Attached is the Agenda for the NFPA 37, Standard for the Installation and Use of Stationary Combustion Engines and Gas Turbines, Second Draft meeting, to be held Tuesday, September 20, and Wednesday, September 21, 2016, at the Hilton Garden Inn Cherry Creek, Denver CO. The meeting is scheduled to run from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM both days. This Agenda will also be posted to the NFPA 37 Document Information Page at http://www.nfpa.org/37 If you have additional items for the Agenda, please bring them with you to the meeting. rpb/ cc INT Meeting Folder INT/NM INT.2016-09 Agenda.doc

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES AGENDA NFPA 37 Second Draft Meeting Technical Committee on Internal Combustion Engines Hilton Garden Inn Cherry Creek, Denver CO Tuesday, September 20, 2016, 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Wednesday, September 21, 2016, 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM 1. Call to Order. 2. Introduction of Attendees. Update of Committee Roster. [Attachment A1] 3. Approval of Minutes of Last Meeting. [November, 2015, NFPA Offices, Quincy MA] [Attachment A2] 4. Report of Committee Chair. 5. Report of Staff Liaison. Technical Committee Membership Status. [Attachment A3] Document Revision Schedule for Annual 2017 Cycle. [Attachment A4] 6. Member Reports on Current Issues. [As Necessary] 7. Task Group Reports. [As Necessary] 8. Review and Act on Public Comments to the First Draft Report on Amendments to the 2015 edition of NFPA 37. [See Attachment A5 for Public Comments & Attachments to Same.] The following are included for reference purposes: [First Revisions to NFPA 30A Attachment A6] [Committee Inputs to NFPA 30A Attachment A7] 9. Recent Correspondence. NONE 10. Old Business. The following were reviewed as New Business at the previous meeting. The Technical Committee decided to defer these to the next document revision cycle for NFPA 37 (Annual 2020). Performance Criteria for Paragraph 5.3.1.1 of NFPA 37. Mr. Elovitz contends that this paragraph should include allowable flowrates and back pressure for sizing the vent piping. Clarification of Paragraph 5.4.4.4 of NFPA 37. INT.2016-09 Agenda.doc

Electrical Area Classification of Interior of Engine Enclosures. Turbine Lube Oil Tanks. Proposed Amendment to Paragraph 11.4.5.1 of NFPA 37. Normal (Breather) vents for Fuel Tanks. Need for Clearance Between Fuel Gas and Electrical Services. 11. New Business. NONE 12. Schedule Next Meeting(s). [See Annual 2020 Revision Schedule Attachment A8] 13. Adjournment. INT.2016-09 Agenda.doc

Address List No Phone Internal Combustion Engines 08/25/2016 Robert P. Benedetti INT-AAA James B. Biggins SE 1/1/1992 Principal INT-AAA TUV SUD America Inc./Global Risk Consultants Corporation 15732 West Barr Road Manhattan, IL 60442-9012 Kevin J. Carlisle Principal Karl Dungs, Inc. 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive, NE Blaine, MN 55449 M 07/29/2013 INT-AAA Larry M. Danner Principal GE Power & Water 300 Garlington Road GTTC Room 200D Greenville, SC 29615-0648 Alternate: William S. Lockhart M 7/19/2002 INT-AAA Kenneth M. Elovitz Principal Energy Economics, Inc. 26 Elm Street Foxboro, MA 02035 SE 1/1/1994 INT-AAA Daniel D. Groff Principal AIG Energy and Engineered Risk 2525 Country Side Lane Wexford, PA 15090-7941 Alternate: Arthur M. Partin I 07/29/2013 INT-AAA Fred L. Hildebrandt Principal Amerex/Janus Fire Systems 1102 Rupcich Drive, Millennium Park Crown Point, IN 46307 Fire Suppression Systems Association M 8/2/2010 INT-AAA David M. Nieman Principal Bechtel Corporation 11720 Plaza America Drive Reston, VA 20190-4757 Alternate: Keegan M. Kinney U 8/5/2009 INT-AAA Steve Oxtoby Principal Kohler Power Systems N7650 County Trunk LS Mail Stop 072 Sheboygan, WI 53083-5518 M 08/11/2014 INT-AAA Steven H. Pasternack Principal Intertek Testing Services 3933 US Route 11 Cortland, NY 13045 RT 4/17/2002 INT-AAA Owen M. Preston Principal 3221 Blair Drive Palatka, FL 32177 SE 7/1/1994 INT-AAA Y. R. Reddy Principal R-B Pumps, Inc. PO Box 557 Baxley, GA 31513 U 4/1/1994 INT-AAA Steve R. Sappington Principal Caterpillar Inc. 175 Cutstone Court Fayetteville, GA 30215-6206 M 04/08/2015 INT-AAA Gerard J. Schnee Principal Solar Turbines Incorporated 9280 Skypark Court San Diego, CA 92123 M 10/27/2009 INT-AAA Richard Scott Principal Chubb Group of Insurance Companies One Financial Center Boston, MA 02111-2697 I 1/1/1994 INT-AAA 1

Address List No Phone Internal Combustion Engines 08/25/2016 Robert P. Benedetti INT-AAA Matthew M. Shanks Principal Montgomery County 255 Rockville Pike, 2nd Floor Rockville, MD 20850-4186 E 04/08/2015 INT-AAA Kow Ken Sun Principal AES Corporation 18915 Relay Road Humble, TX 77346-6059 U 10/29/2012 INT-AAA Stephen Garner Voting Alternate Exponent, Inc. 1013 North Honore Street, Unit 1 Chicago, IL 60622-3718 SE 04/08/2015 INT-AAA Keegan M. Kinney Alternate Bechtel Power Corporation 11720 Plaza America Drive Reston, VA 20190 Principal: David M. Nieman U 10/29/2012 INT-AAA William S. Lockhart Alternate GE Power & Water 2429 NW 59th Street Oklahoma City, OK 73112-7373 Principal: Larry M. Danner M 03/03/2014 INT-AAA Arthur M. Partin Alternate AIG Energy & Engineered Risk 10207 Rubury Place Tampa, FL 33626 Principal: Daniel D. Groff I 10/28/2014 INT-AAA Robert P. Benedetti Staff Liaison National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA 02169-7471 7/2/2002 INT-AAA 2

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES MINUTES of MEETING Technical Committee on Internal Combustion Engines National Fire Protection Association Quincy, MA November 12 & 13, 2015 I. Attendance J. B. Biggins, Global Risk Consultants Corporation K. J. Carlisle, Karl Dungs, Inc. L. M. Danner, GE Power K. M. Elovitz, Energy Economics, Inc. S. Garner, Exponent, Inc. (Alternate to Z. M. Ibrahim) [via web conference] D. D. Groff, AIG Energy and Engineered Risk [via web conference] F. L. Hildebrandt, Janus Fire Systems (Rep. Fire Suppression Systems Association) Z. Ibraham, Exponent, Inc. D. M. Nieman, Bechtel Power Corporation S. Oxtoby, Kohler Power Systems A. M. Partin, AIG Energy and Engineered Risk (Alternate to D. D. Groff) S. Oxtoby, Kohler Power Systems [via web conference] A. Partin, AIG Energy & Engineered Risk [via web conference] S. H. Pasternack, Intertek Testing Services [via web conference] S. R. Sappington, Caterpillar Inc. [via web conference] G. J. Schnee, Solar Turbines Incorporated K. K. Sun, AES Corporation R. P. Benedetti, National Fire Protection Association, STAFF LIAISON GUESTS: E. Edwards, National Fire Protection Association J. E. Shapiro, National Fire Protection Association M. E. Woodruff, National Fire Protection Association MEMBERS NOT ATTENDING: K. M. Kinney, Bechtel Power Corporation (Alternate to D. M. Nieman) W. S. Lockhart, GE Power (Alternate to L. M. Danner) O. M. Preston, Palatka, FL Y. R. Reddy, R-B Pumps, Inc. R. Scott, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies M. M. Shanks, Montgomery County MD M. Tretinjak, Solar Turbines Incorporated II. Minutes 1. The Meeting was called to order at 9:00 AM on November 12, 2015 by Acting Chair Jim Biggins. INT.2015-11 Minutes.doc

2. Attendees introduced themselves and the Technical Committee roster was updated as needed. An updated roster will be posted to the Technical Committee s Document Information Web Page. 3. The Minutes of the last meeting (March 2013, Greenville SC) were unanimously approved as submitted. 4. The Acting Chair did not have a report. 5. The Staff Liaison reviewed with the Technical Committee the following items: Technical Committee Scope Statement. The Staff Liaison noted that NFPA 37 was beginning to find use in marine application. This might necessitate a change to the Technical Committee s scope statement. The Technical Committee deferred action on this. Technical Committee Membership. The Staff Liaison was directed to solicit participation by UL LLC. Review of Annual 2017 Document Revision Schedule. The Staff Liaison reviewed the schedule. Orientation. Ms. Shapiro presented an orientation on the new document handling system. 6. Mary Elizabeth Woodruff and Edie Edwards, of NFPA s C S Morgan Library, briefed the Technical Committee on the library s research capabilities that are available to NFPA committees. The Staff Liaison briefed the Technical Committee on the differences between NFPA s classification of flammable / combustible liquids and that being implemented by the U. S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, under the Globally Harmonized System for container marking. 7. The Technical Committee reviewed and acted on all public inputs recommending amendments to the 2015 edition of NFPA 37. One Task Group was established to review the proposed new Section 5.6 on overpressure protection. The Task Group is chaired by Mr. Carlisle and includes Messrs. Elovitz, Hildebrandt, and Sun. 8. There was no Old Business requiring the Technical Committee s attention. 9. Under New Business : Use of NFPA 37 in Marine Applications. The Technical Committee discussed this afore-mentioned topic and determined the subject is beyond the scope of NFPA 37. Text was added to Annex Item A.1.3.1 that NFPA 37 s applicability in marine venues is limited to non-propulsion engines and turbines. Clarification of Paragraph 4.3(3) of NFPA 37. This issue was given to a Task Group consisting of Messrs. Danner, Hildebrandt, and Schnee. Performance Criteria for Paragraph 5.3.1.1 of NFPA 37. This was deferred to the next document revision cycle. Mr. Elovitz contends that this paragraph should include allowable flowrates and back pressure for sizing the vent piping. Clarification of Subsection 5.4.3 of NFPA 37. This was addressed by a First Revision that changed the shutdown time from 1 sec. to 2 sec. Clarification of Paragraph 5.4.4.4 of NFPA 37. Deferred to the next document revision cycle. Clarification of Paragraph 6.3.2.2 of NFPA 37. No action necessary. Electrical Area Classification of Interior of Engine Enclosures. Deferred to the next document revision cycle. Definition of Pierced Wall. Term not used in NFPA 37; no need to define. Clarification of Annex Item A.11.3.1 of NFPA 37. The Technical Committee drafted a First Revision to specify the maximum expected temperature within the enclosure. This also corrected an erroneous conversion: 28 C is 50 F. Corrections to ASHRAE References. Handled by First Revisions. Turbine Lube Oil Tanks. Deferred to the next document revision cycle. Proposed Amendment to Paragraph 11.4.5.1 of NFPA 37. Deferred to the next document revision cycle. Normal (Breather) vents for Fuel Tanks. Deferred to the next document revision cycle. Need for Clearance Between Fuel Gas and Electrical Services. Deferred to the next document revision cycle. INT.2015-11 Minutes.doc

10. The Technical Committee tentatively scheduled its next meeting for the week of September 18 or the week of September 25, 2016, in Denver CO. 11. The meeting adjourned at 12:20 PM on November 13. INT.2015-11 Minutes.doc

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES SCOPE STATEMENT This Committee shall have primary responsibility for documents on the fire safety of the installation, operation, and control of internal combustion engines, including gas turbine engines, using all types of fuel, within structures or immediately exposing structures. Responsible for NFPA 37, Standard for the Installation and Use of Stationary Combustion Engines and Gas Turbines. COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP BALANCE Principals: 16 M: 6 (35%)* U: 3 (18%) Voting Alternates: 1 I/M: 0 L/C: 0 Alternates: 4 R/T: 1 (6%) E: 1 (6%) Non-Voting: 0 I: 2 (12%) SE: 4 (24%) Emeritus 0 Task Group: 0 Hold List: 1 Balance: Overbalanced by 1 M *(combustion controls: 1 generator sets: 2 internal combustion engines: 0 fire suppression systems: 1 turbines: 2) INT Scope Statement & Member Balance.doc - 8/12/2016

2017 ANNUAL REVISION CYCLE *Public Input Dates may vary according to standards and schedules for Revision Cycles may change. Please check the NFPA Website for the most up to date information on Public Input Closing Dates and schedules at www.nfpa.org/document # (i.e. www.nfpa.org/101) and click on the Next Edition tab. Process Stage Process Step Dates for TC Dates for TC with CC Public Input Closing Date* 7/6/15 7/6/15 Final Date for TC First Draft Meeting 12/14/15 9/14/15 Public Input Posting of First Draft and TC Ballot 2/1/16 10/26/15 Stage Final date for Receipt of TC First Draft ballot 2/22/16 11/16/15 `(First Draft) Final date for Receipt of TC First Draft ballot recirc 2/29/16 11/23/15 Posting of First Draft for CC Meeting 11/30/15 Final date for CC First Draft Meeting 1/11/16 Posting of First Draft and CC Ballot 2/1/16 Final date for Receipt of CC First Draft ballot 2/22/16 Final date for Receipt of CC First Draft ballot recirc 2/29/16 Post First Draft Report for Public Comment 3/7/16 3/7/16 Public Comment closing date 5/16/16 5/16/16 Final Date to Publish Notice of Consent Standards (Standards that 5/30/16 5/30/16 received no Comments) Appeal Closing Date for Consent Standards (Standards that received 6/13/16 6/13/16 no Comments) Final date for TC Second Draft Meeting 10/31/16 7/25/16 Comment Posting of Second Draft and TC Ballot 12/12/16 9/5/16 Stage Final date for Receipt of TC Second Draft ballot 1/2/17 9/26/16 (Second Final date for receipt of TC Second Draft ballot recirc 1/9/17 10/3/16 Draft) Posting of Second Draft for CC Meeting 10/10/16 Final date for CC Second Draft Meeting 11/21/16 Posting of Second Draft for CC Ballot 12/12/16 Final date for Receipt of CC Second Draft ballot 1/2/17 Final date for Receipt of CC Second Draft ballot recirc 1/9/17 Post Second Draft Report for NITMAM Review 1/16/17 1/16/17 Tech Session Notice of Intent to Make a Motion (NITMAM) Closing Date 2/20/17 2/20/17 Preparation Posting of Certified Amending Motions (CAMs) and Consent 4/17/17 4/17/17 Standards (& Issuance) Appeal Closing Date for Consent Standards 5/2/17 5/2/17 SC Issuance Date for Consent Standards 5/12/17 5/12/17 Tech Session Association Meeting for Standards with CAMs 6/4 7/2017 6/4 7/2017 Appeals and Appeal Closing Date for Standards with CAMs 6/27/17 6/27/17 Issuance SC Issuance Date for Standards with CAMs 8/10/17 8/10/17 Approved: October 30, 2012 Revised

of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 6-NFPA 37-2016 [ New Section after 1.6 ] TITLE OF NEW CONTENT Type your content here... 1.7 Pressure Measurement. All pressures expressed in this document are gauge pressures unless specifically noted otherwise. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment change is being made to coordinate with the proposed revisions to section 5.6. Related Item First Revision No. 11-NFPA 37-2015 [New Section after 5.5] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 06 15:30:13 EDT 2016

of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 37-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.7 ] TITLE OF NEW CONTENT Inlet Gas Pressure: The pressure at the outlet of the equipment isolation valve. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment change is being made to coordinate with the proposed revisions to section 5.6 Related Item First Revision No. 22-NFPA 37-2015 [Global Input] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 06 15:37:38 EDT 2016

of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 8-NFPA 37-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.7 ] TITLE OF NEW CONTENT Line Pressure Regulator: A pressure regulator placed in a gas line between the service regulator and the appliance regulator [ 54, 2015] Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment change is being made to coordinate with the proposed revisions to section 5.6 Related Item First Revision No. 22-NFPA 37-2015 [Global Input] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 06 15:33:20 EDT 2016

of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 9-NFPA 37-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.9 ] Rated Pressure. The maximum internal and external pressures that the materials, devices, or components are designed to contain or control. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment change is being made to coordinate with the proposed revisions to section 5.6 Related Item First Revision No. 22-NFPA 37-2015 [Global Input] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 06 15:36:08 EDT 2016

of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 7-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.9 ] 3.3.9 Protected Pressure. The set pressure of the nearest upstream overpressure protection device or the inlet pressure to the service regulator, whichever is lower. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment change is being made to coordinate with the proposed revisions to section 5.6 Related Item First Revision No. 22-NFPA 37-2015 [Global Input] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 06 15:32:33 EDT 2016

of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 1-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.1.3 ] 4.1.3 Engines Located on Roofs, Platforms, and Other Supporting Structures. 4.1.3.1 Engines, and their weatherproof housings, if provided, that are installed on roofs of structures, on platforms, or on other supporting structures shall be located at least 1.5 m (5 ft) from openings in walls and at least 1.5 m (5 ft) from structures having combustible walls. A minimum separation shall not be required where the following conditions exist: The adjacent wall of the structure has combustible structures except as provided in 4.1.3.1.1 or 4.1.3.1.2 4.1.3.1.1 A clearance less than 1.5 m (5 ft) shall be permitted where all portions of the structure that are closer than 1.5 m (5 ft) from the engine enclosure have a fire resistance rating of at least 1 hour. * The weatherproof enclosure is constructed of noncombustible materials and it has been demonstrated hr. 4.1.3.1.2 A clearance less than 1.5m (5 ft) shall be permitted where it has been demonstrated through testing by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction that a fire within the enclosure will not ignite combustible materials outside the enclosure structures. 4.1.3.2 An oil A liquid containment system consisting of a curb or dike having a capacity at least equal to the total capacity of the lubricating oil system or, the liquid fuel system, whichever is greater and the engine coolant system, shall be provided. This system shall also comply with applicable requirements of Chapter 6 except as provided in 4.1.3.2.1. 4.1.3. 3 * 2.1 Where engines are connected to a Chapter 5 fuel supply system, a liquid containment system shall not be required where engines provided with weatherproof housings have the available capacity to contain the total capacity of the oil lubricating system and engine coolant system within the weatherproof enclosure. 4.1.3.3 The surface beneath the engine and beyond the engine and the oil liquid containment dike shall be noncombustible to a minimum distance of 300 mm (12 in.), except as provided in 4.1.3.3.1. 4.1.3.3.1 The surface beneath the engine and beyond the engine and the liquid containment dike, if provided, shall not be required to be noncombustible where it has be demonstrated through testing by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction that a fire within the enclosure will not ignite the roofs of structures, platforms constructed of combustible materials, or other supporting structures. Additional Proposed Changes File Name 20_kw_residential_generac_on_a_raised_platform_serviced_by_NNG_automatic_standby_generators- 540x272.jpg Generac_air-cooled.gif Description Approved Generac air-cooled generator on a combustible platform air-cooled generator on a combustible platform

of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM kohler-generator-on-a-platform-installed-by-nng-in_richmond_county.jpg Kolher_.jpg 27_kw_kilowatt_generac_generator_on_a_custom_built_platform_by_northern_neck_generator_in_middlesex.jpg generac-48kw-generator-on-raised-platform-and-200-amp-transfer-switch-installed-by-northern-neck-generatorin-kilmarnock.jpg generac-70-kilowatt-generator-installed-on-a-raised-platform-by-nng-standby-generators.jpg Bad_Core_Power.JPG Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Kolher air-cooled generator on a combustible platform air-cooled generator on a combustible platform Generac liquidcooled on a combustible platform Generac liquidcooled generator on a combustible platform Generac liquid cooled on a combustible platform Generac 7 kw installed on a wood deck The placement changes made in FR 1 to 4.1.4 would also apply to 4.1.3 as an engine located on top of a structure (roof) is also an engine located outdoors. The language should be identical for enforcement purposes. With the expansion of the installation of permanently installed residential generators throughout the country, there have been concerns with the placement of these units on combustible supporting structures. NFPA 37, 4.1.3 covered the placement of large scale commercial and industrial generator on roofs, but did not address requirements for residential applications. Areas of the country that are in FEMA flood zones require equipment to be installed above the flood level. A common practice to raise the generator above these FEMA flood levels, has been the placement of the generator on a platform constructed of combustible materials, or on an existing wood deck, porch or other structure suitable for supporting the generator. These small residential generators are then connected to a fixed fuel piping system, either natural gas or LP vapor. The generators installed on platforms in the attached pictures do not have a noncombustible separation installed between the generator and the supporting structure. If the generator were to have a fire within the enclosure, the fire could spread to the combustible platform and the platform could collapse. When this occurs the generator connection to the fixed fuel piping system can be compromised, and now a fuel gas is discharging into atmosphere next to an open flame. The public comment would add clarity to the code that any combustible structure that is utilized to support any generator would be required to be fully protected from a fire within the generator enclosure. The change to liquid containment dike would add clarity that the engine coolant is as important to contain as the engine oil and fuel, and if all systems are compromised the total capacity of all systems shall be contained. Although the concept of a water-based fluid being flammable may be difficult for installers to comprehend, one must recognize that coolant is actually glycol based and only mixed with water. Raised to a high enough temperature, the glycol is still flammable even in the presence of water vapor. The exception to the requirement for the containment dike would allow the weatherproof enclosure of small air-cooled and liquid-cooled generators that are connected to a Chapter 5 fuel supply system to serve this purpose as long as the enclosure has the available capacity. Small air-generator cooled engine generators contain on average 2 quarts of oil or less. SwRI, and OSHA NRTL, has performed enclosure testing on engine enclosures for generator manufacturers. These tests were performed for generators installed at grade level, however if additional testing can demonstrate that the engine enclosure

of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM will not ignite a combustible supporting structure, consideration should be given to the listed engine enclosure serving as the required noncombustible separation and additional noncombustible separations should not be required. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. 4.1.4] Related Item Relationship Public Input No. 1-NFPA 37-2014 [Section No. 5.4.3 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Brian Baughman Organization: Generac Power Systems Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed Mar 02 16:57:11 EST 2016

of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.1.4 ] 4.1.4 Engines Located Outdoors. 4.1.4.1 Engines, and their weatherproof housings, if provided, that are installed outdoors shall be located at least 1.5 m (5 ft) from openings in walls and at least 1.5 m (5 ft) from combustible structures except as provided in 4.1.4.1.1 or 4.1.4.1.2 4.1.4.1.1 A clearance less than 1.5 m (5 ft) shall be permitted where all portions of structures that are closer than 1.5 m (5 ft) from the engine enclosure have a fire resistance rating of at least 1 hour. 4.1.4.1.2 A clearance less than 1.5 m (5 ft) shall be permitted where it has been demonstrated by one of the following methods through testing by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction that a fire within the enclosure will not ignite structures: * Where a full-scale fire test has shown that the complete consumption of the combustibles within the enclosure will not ignite structures, the engine structure. Engines, and their weatherproof housings, if provided, shall be permitted to be placed at a distance no less than that specified during the fire test from a wall constructed of the same material. * Where calculations have shown that a fire within the engine enclosure will not ignite structures, the engine shall be permitted to be placed at a distance no less than that specified in the calculations. combustible materials. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The first draft language does not bring clarity to the code. SwRI, an OSHA NRTL, has performed full scale engine enclosure testing for generator manufacturers and has certified through listing and labeling which generator manufacturer enclosures are approved as meeting the requirement in Clause 1 of 4.1.4.1.2. Clause 2 of 4.1.4.1.2 does not state what approved calculations are acceptable and who is deemed qualified to perform these calculations. The States are required to participate in the OSHA safety programs or substitute their own safety programs. The State is the authority having jurisdiction and the State can approve their own recognized testing laboratory. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 1-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. 4.1.3] Related Item First Revision No. 1-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.1.4] Relationship Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Brian Baughman Organization: Generac Power Systems Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed Mar 02 17:33:47 EST 2016

0 of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 13-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.1.4.1 ] 4.1.4.1 Engines, and their weatherproof housings, if provided, that are installed outdoors shall be located at least 1.5 m (5 ft) from openings in walls and at least 1.5 m (5 ft) from combustible structures except as provided in 4.1.4.1.1 or 4.1.4.1.2 4.1.4.1.1 A clearance less than 1.5 m (5 ft) shall be permitted where all portions of structures that are closer than 1.5 m (5 ft) from the engine enclosure have a fire resistance rating of at least 1 hour. 4.1.4.1.2 A clearance less than 1.5 m (5 ft) shall be permitted where it has been demonstrated by one of the following methods acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction that a fire within the enclosure will not ignite structures: (1)* Where a full-scale fire test has shown that the complete consumption of the combustibles within the enclosure will not ignite structures, the engine shall be permitted to be placed at a distance no less than that specified during the fire test from a wall of the same material. (2)* Where calculations have shown that a fire within the engine enclosure will not ignite structures, the engine shall be permitted to be placed at a distance no less than that specified in the calculations. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment I fully support the proposed language. Related Item First Revision No. 1-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.1.4] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler Organization: GBH International Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 11 19:31:29 EDT 2016

1 of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 20-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.1.4.1.2 ] 4.1.4.1.2 A clearance less than 1.5 m (5 ft) shall be permitted where it has been demonstrated by one of the following methods acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction that a fire within the enclosure will not ignite structures: (1) * Where a full-scale fire test has shown that the complete consumption of the combustibles within the enclosure will not ignite structures, the engine shall be permitted to be placed at a distance no less than that specified during the fire test from a wall of the same material. (2) * Where calculations have shown that a fire within the engine enclosure will not ignite structures, the engine shall be permitted to be placed at a distance no less than that specified in the calculations. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Calculations to predict the results of a fire inside the enclosure of an engine generator are limited in scope. Limited in scope, to the effect of the combustible materials that are a part of the engine generator construction. However, the combustibles that are a part of the engine generator construction are not the only combustibles that can burn inside the enclosure once ignited. In particular, there is a fuel source attached to the engine generator that is routed into the enclosure as well. The most common types of fuel sources are propane (liquid or vapor), natural gas, or diesel fuel. If the fuel source is natural gas the supply is unlimited. Propane and diesel fuel as a fuel source are limited by the size of the supply tank but usually have an adequate supply to flow for many hours. Depending on whether the unit is running or not, the Automatic Safety Shutoff Valves (ASSVs) will be open (engine running) or closed (engine not running). If the engine is running, the ASSVs are open, when the fuel lines and other fuel containing parts are consumed the fuel will enter the compartment and be available to burn. The fuel burning will add a significant amount of energy to the enclosure and heat load that is to be contained within the enclosure. Normally the engine will stop when the fuel lines are consumed due to the lack of fuel to power the engine. The ASSVs will close if they can. The ability of the ASSVs to close is dependent on if the fire has damaged the internal sealing components. The ASSVs sealing components are usually made from rubber or a similar material and melt at a relatively low temperature. Regardless of whether the engine is running or not the fire inside the enclosure can potentially comprise the gas shutoff valve and allow the fuel supply to enter the enclosure and fuel the fire. It would be very difficult to calculate the effect of this additional fuel source, rate of burn, path of burn and the overall effect on the ability of the engine generator enclosure to contain the fire. This is why the calculations to predict the results of a fire inside the enclosure of an engine generator are limited in scope. Since this approach is limited in scope, section 4.1.4.1.2 (2) should be eliminated from the 2018 version of NFPA 37. Related Item First Revision No. 1-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.1.4] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Jeff Jonas Organization: Generac Power Systems Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 18 15:57:48 EDT 2016

2 of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 15-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.3 ] 4.3* Hazardous Locations. In hazardous locations, engines that neither compress a flammable gas nor pump a flammable liquid shall meet the following three criteria: (1) They shall be installed in a an enclosure or room of fire-resistive construction. (2) They shall be ventilated from a nonhazardous outside area. (3) They shall have outside access only defined emergency egress path(s). Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Larger gensets and turbines today are being provided with large, purpose designed free standing enclosures that are not an engine room as used in NFPA 37. Engine room as used in NFPA 37 implies a portion of a building that is walled off to provide a separate space in which an engine / turbine is placed; much like we wall off Office or Bathroom spaces in a building. The task group has provided an expanded discussion of enclosures at Annex section A.3.3.2 that considers and distinguishes between the close fitting weather covers that are provided for small gensets and microturbines; and the large, purpose designed, free standing enclosures, purpose designed packages and containerized assemblies that are provided with larger genset and industrial turbine installations. Recognizing that the free standing purpose designed enclosures, packages and containers for gensets and turbines are being placed as an assembly within a larger building, it is usually not practical (nor is it being provided!) for personnel working within those structures to have a direct exit to outdoors; rather they exit to the larger building from which an exit path to the outdoors must be provided This change recognizes the evolution in installation configurations. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 16-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. 4.5.1] Public Comment No. 17-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. 4.5.2] Public Comment No. 18-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. A.3.3.2] Related Item First Revision No. 20-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.3] Relationship Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Larry Danner Organization: GE Power & Water Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon May 16 08:08:58 EDT 2016

3 of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 16-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.5.1 ] 4.5.1 Electrical installations in rooms, or enclosures containing engines shall comply with NFPA 70. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment enclosures added here for consistency with the changes made to 4.3 and the expanded discussion of enclosures provided in Annex A.3.3.2. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 15-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. 4.3] Related Item First Revision No. 20-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.3] Relationship Change for Consistency between clauses Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Larry Danner Organization: GE Power & Water Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon May 16 08:22:10 EDT 2016

4 of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 17-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 4.5.2 ] 4.5.2 Engine rooms, enclosures, or other locations shall not be classified as hazardous locations as defined in Article 500 of NFPA 70, solely by reason of the engine fuel, lubricating oil, or hydraulic fluid. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment enclosures added here for consistency with the changes made to 4.3 and the expanded discussion of enclosures provided at Annex section A..3.3.2. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Relationship Public Comment No. 15-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. 4.3] Provide consistency with Public Comment 15 Related Item First Revision No. 20-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.3] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Larry Danner Organization: GE Power & Water Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon May 16 08:26:23 EDT 2016

5 of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 4-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 5.1 ] 5.1* Gas Piping Gas Train Materials and Fittings and Gas Piping Systems. 5.1.1 Gas piping system from the point of delivery to the equipment isolation valve shall be installed in accordance with the following methods: (1) All fuel gas piping systems at service pressures equal to or less than a gauge pressure of 860 kpa (gauge pressure of 125 psi) shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 54. (2) All fuel gas p iping systems at service pressures in excess of a gauge pressure of 860 kpa (gauge pressure of 125 psi), other than LP-Gas systems, shall be installed in accordance with ANSI/ASME B31.3, Process Piping. (3) LP-Gas p iping systems, whether liquid or vapor phase, shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of NFPA 58. 5.1.2* Plastic pipe on the gas train or within the gas piping system shall not be used to carry fuel within a room housing an engine(s). 5.1.3 Approved metallic flexible connectors on a gas train or within the gas piping system shall be permitted for protection against damage caused by settlement, vibration, expansion, contraction, or corrosion. 5.1.4 Approved nonmetallic connectors on a gas train or within the gas piping system shall be permitted for protection against damage caused by settlement, vibration, expansion, contraction, or corrosion except for LP-Gas in the liquid phase. 5.1.5* Connectors used on the gas train for vibration dampening shall be properly anchored and installed according to manufacturer's instructions. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The term fuel gas piping system in NFPA 54 is all piping upstream of the equipment isolation valve. NPFA 54 defines piping system as All pipe, tubing, valves, and fittings from the point of delivery to the outlets of the appliance shutoff valve (aka equipment isolation valve). All piping that is downstream of the equipment isolation valve is part of the fuel gas train, which is part of the engine and is not considered fuel gas piping. 2) The NFPA 54 reference is circuitous; NPFA 86 references a standard, whose scope does not cover and should not be applied to a fuel gas train of the oven. Thus, unintentional conflicts can occur. For example, NPFA 54 (2015), 5.6 Acceptable Piping Materials and Joining Methods required that non-ferrous flanged (i.e. aluminum flanged connections) comply with ANSI/ASME B16.24, Cast Copper Alloy Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings: Classes 150, 300, 600. 900, 1500, and 2500 (see NFPA 54, paragraph 5.6.10.1.3). This standard only permits flat face flanges. For design of gas trains, the use of Aluminum valves with raised face flanges has been standard since the 1930 s. Such valves are permitted in NPFA 86, NFPA 85, CDS-1, UJL 795, UL 2200, and a whole host of ANSI standards, and the intent of the NFPA 54 reference is not to prohibit the use of aluminum valves with raised face flanges. Related Item Committee Input No. 10-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 5.1.1] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc. Street Address: City: State:

6 of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Zip: Submittal Date: Wed Mar 16 17:23:27 EDT 2016

7 of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. 5.6 ] 5.6 Overpressure Protection. 5.6.1 Overpressure protection shall be required for any fuel gas train subject to either of the following conditions : LP-Gas piping systems, whether liquid or vapor phase, in accordance with the provisions of NFPA 58. Fuel gas piping systems at service pressures in excess of a gauge pressure of 860 kpa ((gauge pressure of 125 psi), other than LP-Gas systems, in accordance with ANSI/ASME B31.3, Process Piping. Fuel gas piping systems and fuel gas trains, handling pressures equal to or less than a gauge pressure of 860 kpa (gauge pressure of 125 psi), when the supply pressure exceeds a gauge pressure of 14 kpa (gauge pressure of : (1) The inlet gas pressure exceeds both 14 kpa ( 2 psi) and the protected pressure already provided to the fuel gas train is greater than the maximum allowable operating pressure rating of any fuel gas train component. 5.6.1.1 When an overpressure protection device is required in 5.6.1(3), the overpressure protection device shall be set to provide a protected pressure so that the following pressures are not exceeded: (1) If the component s maximum allowable operating pressure rating is a gauge pressure less than 83 kpa (gauge pressure less than 12 psi), the allowable overpressure is 50 percent over the maximum allowable operating pressure rating of the component. (2) If the component s maximum allowable operating pressure rating is a gauge pressure equal to or greater than 83 kpa but less than 414 kpa (gauge pressure equal to or greater than 12 but less than 60 psi), the allowable overpressure is a gauge pressure of 41 kpa (gauge pressure of 6 psi) over the maximum allowable operating pressure rating of the component. (3) If the component s maximum allowable operating pressure rating is a gauge pressure equal to or greater than 414 kpa but less than or equal to 860 kpa (gauge pressure equal to or greater than 60 psi), but less than or equal to 125 psi), the allowable overpressure is 10 percent over the maximum allowable operating pressure rating of the component. (1) rated pressure of any downstream component (2) The failure of a single upstream line pressure regulator results in an inlet gas pressure exceeding the rated pressure of any downstream component

8 of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM 5.6.1.2 1 The overpressure protection device required in 5.6.1.1(3) shall also comply with the following: (1) The overpressure protection device shall be any one device permitted in Section 5.9 of NFPA 54. The gas piping system or fuel gas train shall be designed and installed such that the (1) * There shall be an active or passive means by which the activation of the overpressure protection device is in a continuous pressure protection mode, and the overpressure condition is (2) detectable. Pressure relief valves, where (1) Where a pressure relief valve(s) is used as the overpressure protection device, the relief valve and all connected vent piping shall be sized to fully relieve the required volume of gas in order to provide a protected pressure in accordance with (2) accommodate the maximum anticipated flow due to the failure of the nearest upstream line pressure regulator. Add annex A. 5.6.1.1 under the following conditions: The upstream pressure regulator in the gas piping system has failed in the wide open position. The required relieving pressure of the relief valve is based on the protected pressure to the upstream pressure regulator in the gas piping system. The pressure limits in this section are consistent with 49 CFR Part 192.201, Required Capacity of Pressure Relieving and Limiting Stations A.5.6.1.1.1(2) An example of active means is an alarm or light notification. An example of passive means is a manual reset. Additional Proposed Changes File Name Description Approved NFPA_37_Section_5_6_-_Revisions_FINAL_TASK_GROUP.docx This is the work of the task group Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment New definitions needed in order to know how to apply the requirement, and this resulted in changes to the wording. Also, scope was limited to the gas train since NFPA 37 does not cover gas piping. Therefore, task group feels that failure of a service regulator need not be needed to drive the requirement of an OPD since the issue is really about failure of line regulator within the upstream gas piping system Related Item First Revision No. 11-NFPA 37-2015 [New Section after 5.5] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 06 15:42:38 EDT 2016

9 of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 18-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. A.3.3.2 ] A.3.3.2 Enclosure. An enclosure is not considered to be a room. An enclosure can be a simple weather protection cover (as typically provided for a small outdoor genset) that cannot be entered by a person, UL2200 is often applied for the design of these enclosures. An enclosure can also be a purpose designed structure provided with an engine or a room. turbine by the manufacturer, which may have provisions for personnel entry to facilitate inspection or maintenance. Some gensets and turbines are provided in a fully self-contained package that may be in the form of a purpose designed structure or a standard shipping container. Although purpose designed structures and packages may be placed within a building, they remain independent structures that are not an integral part of the building and, therefore, do not constitute an engine room as used in NFPA 37. These purpose designed structures / packages may provide any of, but are not limited to, the following functions: (1) Environmental protection (2) Noise containment (3) Fire protection (4) Heat rejection / ventilation (5) Human protection (6) Hazardous area classification Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment This expanded discussion for the term enclosure a) recognizes and details the current variety of installations for gensets and turbines, and b) provides clarity on the subject to users of NFPA 37. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 15-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. 4.3] Public Comment No. 19-NFPA 37-2016 [Section No. B.1.2.9] Related Item First Revision No. 20-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.3] Relationship Provides an updated discussion of "enclosur" as used in Public Comment 15 Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Larry Danner Organization: GE Power & Water Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon May 16 08:31:28 EDT 2016

0 of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 12-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. A.4.1.4.1.2(2) ] A.4.1.4.1.2(2) The calculation procedure procedures in Chapter 10 of NFPA 555 is contain a procedure similar to the Radiant Ignition of a Near Fuel algorithm in NIST s Fire Protection Engineering Tools for Hazard Estimation (FPETool) for calculating ignition from a nearby fire. It is a sound, engineering-based method of predicting the risk radiative ignition of ignition from a fire a material not in direct contact with a flame. The values in 4.1.4 and the reference to the NFPA 555 calculation method are the result of the calculations presented to the technical committee in 1996. The calculations treated an engine fire as a vertical cylinder. The values in 4.1.4 changed somewhat in the 1998 edition of NFPA 37 based on those calculations. They are reasonably consistent with the requirements of the Building Officials and Code Administrators (BOCA) National Building Code, which was in effect at the time. The committee wanted to include a performance alternative in NFPA 37. The reference in this annex section to the NFPA 555 method provides guidance on how to evaluate proposed alternatives. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment I fully support the concept in this annex note. The proposed change is basically editorial. Chapter 10 of NFPA 555 contains more than one procedure for evaluating radiative ignition. The procedures do not address risk but hazard, which is the potential for harm. The charging paragraph of Chapter 10 of NFPA 555 is shown below. 10.1 Methods/Tools. A set of analytical methods or tools is needed to provide a means for performing the evaluations embodied by the definitions in Section 8.3. In particular, methods are needed to predict the heating to ignition of materials contained within a fuel package as well as the radiative heat transfer to the material from other fuel packages or the hot gas layer. This chapter focuses on the radiative ignition of a material not in direct contact with a flame. Related Item First Revision No. 1-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 4.1.4] First Revision No. 23-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. A.4.1.4(2)] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler Organization: GBH International Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 11 19:22:21 EDT 2016

1 of 22 9/12/2016 2:51 PM Public Comment No. 5-NFPA 37-2016 [ Section No. A.5.1 ] A.5.1 Gaseous-fueled engines are those engines in which the fuel supply is delivered to the engine in vapor form, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) Natural gas (2) Compressed natural gas (CNG) (3) Propane (4) LP-Gas (5) Mixed gas (6) Manufactured gas and syngas (7) Biogas (e.g., landfill and digester gas) (for biogas applications, see CSA B149.6-15, Code for Digester Gas and Landfill Gas Installations for Piping Materials and Practices) Liquefied natural gas (LNG), for the purpose of Chapter 5, can be considered a gaseous fuel for engines. Piping systems supplying gaseous fuels should be designed to minimize piping failure. Several examples of methods for minimizing piping failure are as follows: (1) Welded pipe joints should be used where practical. Threaded couplings and bolted flanges should be assembled in accordance with the manufacturer's requirements. (2) If rigid metal piping is used, it should be designed to deflect with the engine in any direction. Properly designed flexible connectors are an alternative in high-vibration areas, such as between rigid pipe supply lines and manifolds or other points of connection to the engine. (3) Rigid piping connected directly to the engine should be supported so that failures will not occur due to the natural frequency of the piping coinciding with the rotational speed of the engine. Care should be taken in the design of pipe supports to avoid vibrations. For guidance on the evacuation/purging, charging, and commissioning of the combustible gas supply in the piping upstream of the equipment isolation valve, refer to NFPA 56. During commissioning, the gas train should be inspected for leaks. Typically, inspection and leak tests of a gas train is performed at a pressure not less than their normal operating pressure using the test method detailed in NFPA 54. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Leak testing of a gas piping system is detailed in NFPA 54. I suggest we have some recommendation in the Annex about using NFPA 54 as the method to test a gas train for external tightness. Related Item Public Input No. 23-NFPA 37-2015 [Section No. 5.1.1] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Kevin Carlisle Organization: Karl Dungs, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri Apr 08 16:56:22 EDT 2016