Appendix E Memorandum of Agreement between FHWA and the SHPO

Similar documents
2.1.8 Cultural Resources Regulatory Setting. Affected Environment, Environmental

P-3819 MOA Page 1 of 22

Public Information/Cultural Resources Committee Workshop August 15, Florida Department of Transportation District One

HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES POLICIES

CEQA and Historic Preservation: A 360 Degree Review

WHEREAS, the SI initiated Section 106 consultation with the DC SHPO regarding the Undertaking by letter dated October 9, 2014; and

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

2013 Annual Status Report St. Elizabeths Programmatic Agreement. January 29, 2014 Page 1 of 8. PA Ref. Line Begin End. Description Timeframe Category

STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION

7.0 DRAFT SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION

January 29, 2015 Page 1 of Annual Status Report St. Elizabeths Programmatic Agreement. PA Ref. Line Begin End. Description Timeframe Category

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

APPENDIX F. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Public Hearing. Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO - Meeting Rooms A and B March 14, open house at 4 p.m., formal presentation at 5 p.m.

Lake County West. Lake County East

ER# /22/03

ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS: SECTION 106 AND SECTION 4(F)

7.0 SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

PUBLIC HEARING. Thursday, December 14, 2017 FDOT Urban Office 2198 Edison Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32204

Goal 1 To establish and follow land use patterns for the long-range development of the campus.

Appendix E Section 4(f) Evaluation

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1472

Poinciana Parkway Extension Project Development & Environment Study

DRAFT SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION INTERSTATE 73 FEIS: I-95 to I-73/I-74 in North Carolina

Beckett Bridge PD& E Study. Presentation to: Board of County Commissioners

APPENDIX J SHPO COORDINATION

Intergovermental Coordination

EAST LAKE TARPON COMMUNITY OVERLAY

Summary of Other State Archeological Guidelines

5.0 Historic Resource Survey

SUMMARY. Support the Southeast Arkansas Regional Intermodal Facility.

Page. I. Introduction 1. II. Project Purpose and Need 2. IV. Description of Section 4(f) Property 2. V. Impacts to Section 4(f) property 3

707 HISTORIC LANDMARK (HL), HISTORIC DISTRICT (HD), AND HISTORIC CORRIDOR (HC)

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION. Technical Memorandum Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Proposed VE Pond

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

2017/11/02. Assessment and Resolution of Adverse Effects. Objectives 32 CFR 800

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP)

Beautification Advisory Committee Mission Statement and Goals & Objectives

ARGENTA TRAIL (CSAH 28/63) REALIGNMENT SOUTH PROJECT (CP 63-25)

Designation Information

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

Open House Public Involvement Meeting Howland High School Cafeteria, 200 Shaffer Drive NE, Warren, Ohio. Informational Handout

City of Norwich Policy Regarding Monuments on City Property

1. New development including where permanent in-ground irrigation systems are installed.

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

2.4 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Goals, Objectives and Policies

Request for Proposals (RFP) for: Columbia County Facilities Fire Detection and Security Improvements

COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN

AASHTO SUBCOMMITTEE ON DESIGN. June 15, 2006 MARK ROBINSON, P.E. DISTRICT 5 INTERSTATE PROGRAM MANAGER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

A Guide to Open Space Design Development in Halifax Regional Municipality

Purpose of Report...1. Planning Framework Provincial Policy Statement Draft PPS...2. Ontario Heritage Act...3

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

Procedures IV. V. Rural Road Design Option

12 Intergovernmental Coordination

Historic and Archaeological Resources

TOWN OF AURORA ARCHITECTURAL SALVAGE PROGRAM GUIDE

Request for Qualifications. Knowledge Park Pedestrian/Cyclist Connectivity Planning and Design

PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA

Project Description. Dear Ms. Roland-Nawi:

Orange County EMERGENCY POWER PLAN (EPP) CRITERIA FOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES & NURSING HOMES

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

We d like to thank you for attending this Wekiva Parkway Section 8 Preliminary Design Update hosted by the Florida Department of Transportation.

14. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY PLAN University of Southern Maine Portland Campus

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

PROJECT STATEMENT LOCATION/DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING. 19 th AVENUE NORTH EXTENSION PROJECT FROM SPRINGDALE DRIVE TO NORTH 2 ND STREET/U.S.

I-4 Beyond the Ultimate. Florida Transportation Builders Association February 9, 2018

volume 11 environmental assessment section 2 environmental impact assessment Part 7 ha 218/08

MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM #6c

SCHEDULE 2 - EXHIBIT 1 DATED [ ] NATIONAL GRID ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION PLC (1) and THE CONNECTION AND USE OF SYSTEM CODE

Goal 1: To Encourage the Orderly, Harmonious and Judicious Use of University Resources in the Development of University Land.

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

All inquiries or complaints will be handled according to CFX procedure and in a prompt and courteous manner.

SECTION 5 - SCENIC HIGHWAYS

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-176-AD] Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT AVIATION Airplanes

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Kalama has many areas of timberland and open areas inside its City limits adjacent to residential areas;

CPA , Bristoe Station and Kettle Run Preservation Study Comprehensive Plan Amendment

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

DRAFT Subject to Modifications

Michael D, Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor. This project was originally approved in 2012 by the BOCC and is summarized as follows:

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

Chapter LANDMARKS AND HISTORIC SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICTS A.120 Enforcement A.130 Severability. Tacoma Municipal Code

The MSII reports for the bridge indicate that the Annual Average Daily Traffic at the bridge is 100. The road can be considered a low volume road.

CULTURAL LANDSCAPES: IDENTIFICATION, EVALUATION, IN 106 PROCESS

Draft Environmental Assessment Appendix A. SHPO Correspondence, January 19, 2017

Corridor Management Committee. September 29, 2017

Section 4(f) De Minimis Memorandum for the Hickman Road over Tuolumne River Bridge Replacement Project (Bridge No. 38C 0004)

PennDOT. single spann lanes and 3- mayy need to be to accommodate. any bridge. addition to III. Date: CRP 07/27/2015 CRP.

CEQA and Historic Resources: The Local Government Perspective

CHAPTER BEAUTIFICATION AND LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT

Section 106 Consulting Parties Kick-off Meeting

National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Compliance

Subject: City of Richfield Cedar Avenue Corridor Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No

2.4 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Goals, Objectives and Policies

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Nathhorst Triangle Area Plan

Transcription:

Appendix E between FHWA and the SHPO

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION AND THE FLORIDA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER PURSUANT TO 36 CFR PART 800 REGARDING THE WEKIVA PARKWAY (SR 429)/SR 46 REALIGNMENT PROJECT IN ORANGE, LAKE, AND SEMINOLE COUNTIES, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) proposes to provide financial assistance to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority (OOCEA) for the Wekiva Parkway (SR 429)/SR 46 Realignment Project (FDOT Financial Project Numbers: 238275-1 and 240200-1) located in Orange, Lake, and Seminole Counties, Florida (hereafter referred to as the Project); and WHEREAS, FHWA has consulted with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. (NHPA), and its implementing regulations [36 CFR Part 800.6 (b)(1)] and has determined that the Project will have adverse effects upon the Paul Bock House (8OR7946) and the Strite House (8OR9844), properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP); and WHEREAS, FHWA has consulted with the Apopka Historical Society, the Orange County Regional History Center, the current property owners of record or their designees, and members of the public and considered their input regarding the proposed effects to the Paul Bock House and the Strite House as well as potential minimization and mitigation options; and WHEREAS, the FDOT and OOCEA have participated in the consultation and have been invited to concur in this ; Page 1

NOW, THEREFORE, FHWA and the SHPO agree that the Project shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to take into account the effect of the Project on historic properties. STIPULATIONS FHWA will ensure that the following measures are implemented: I. Project Design and Construction A. The Project will be constructed by OOCEA/FDOT within the rightof-way and elevations delineated on the Wekiva Parkway (SR 429)/SR 46 Realignment PD&E Study Preliminary Concept Plans for the Proposed Build Alternative (hereafter referred to as Plans ) dated July 2010, subject to alterations that may be necessary during the Project design phase to achieve the Project s purpose. B. Should there be any alterations to the Project that could result in adverse effects to historic resources not addressed in this agreement, OOCEA/FDOT shall notify FHWA to advise the SHPO of these alterations and provide the SHPO with an opportunity to review and comment on the Project, in accordance with Stipulation VII.C. II. Mitigation of Adverse Effects to the Paul Bock House A. Prior to initiating any alterations to the Bock House, OOCEA/FDOT shall complete Historic American Building Survey (HABS) Level II documentation and provide it to FHWA for transmittal to the SHPO, Orange County Regional History Center and Apopka Historical Society for their review and comment and for archiving. 1. Pursuant to Section 110(b) of the National Historic Preservation Act, OOCEA/FDOT shall ensure that: a. The documentation shall be completed and submitted to FHWA for transmittal to the SHPO, Orange County Regional History Center, and Apopka Historical Society. b. All documentation shall be completed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards and Page 2

Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering Documentation Level II (68 FR 43159-62). c. For the Paul Bock House, the following HABS Level II documentation shall be prepared: i. Drawings Select existing drawings, where available, should be photographed with largeformat negatives or photographically reproduced on Mylar. If existing drawings are unavailable, an existing floor plan of the main house and site plan of the property, including the outbuildings and landscape features, shall be produced. ii. iii. Photographs Photographs will be prepared with large-format negatives of exterior and interior views, or historic views, where available. Historic outbuildings and landscape features will also be photographed. All negatives and prints will be processed to meet archival standards. Written Data A substantive and detailed report with a narrative description of the historic building, outbuildings, landscape features, discussion of the significance, and historical context will be prepared. 2. The mitigation activities in Stipulation II.A.1 will commence during the design phase of the Project and will be submitted to the SHPO, Orange County Regional History Center, and Apopka Historical Society no later than eighteen (18) months after the completion of the design phase for this portion of the Project. B. In order to mitigate potential visual impacts that may occur with the introduction of the Wekiva Parkway within the historic boundaries of the Paul Bock property, OOCEA/FDOT will ensure that the following activities shall take place in coordination with the property owner of record or their designee: Page 3

1. New doors and windows with appropriate glass thickness shall be installed in the current door and windows openings of the Paul Bock House. Replacement doors and windows shall be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1999) and Preservation Brief #9: The Repair of Wooden Windows (U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1981). 2. Wall insulation shall be installed and any gaps in the walls shall be sealed on the Paul Bock House. Any repairs to the building shall be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1999). 3. Landscape screening shall be installed on the Paul Bock House property, or within the Project right-of-way between the roadway and the Paul Bock House, as a visual buffer between the house and historic outbuildings and the Wekiva Parkway facility. Any landscaping that is installed shall be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1999). 4. The mitigation activities in Stipulations II.B.1-3 will commence, as soon as practical, once the right-of-way acquisition of property from within the Paul Bock House boundaries has been completed. 5. A Preservation Covenant or Easement shall be developed in consultation with OOCEA/FDOT, FHWA, the SHPO, and the property owner of record or their designee to ensure protection of the historic structure following commencement of the improvements listed in Stipulations II.B.1-3. 6. Any documents or information provided to the SHPO by FHWA will be subject to review and comment by the SHPO. Page 4

III. Mitigation of Adverse Effects to the Strite House A. Prior to initiating any alterations to the Strite House, OOCEA/FDOT shall complete Historic American Building Survey (HABS) Level II documentation and provide it to FHWA for transmittal to the SHPO, Orange County Regional History Center and Apopka Historical Society for their review and comment and for archiving. 1. Pursuant to Section 110(b) of the National Historic Preservation Act, OOCEA/FDOT shall ensure that: a. The documentation shall be completed and submitted to FHWA for transmittal to the SHPO, Orange County Regional History Center, and Apopka Historical Society. b. All documentation shall be completed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering Documentation Level II (68 FR 43159-62). c. For the Strite House, the following HABS Level II documentation shall be prepared: i. Drawings Select existing drawings, where available, should be photographed with largeformat negatives or photographically reproduced on Mylar. If existing drawings are unavailable, an existing floorplan of the main building and site plan of the property, including ancillary structures and landscape features, shall be produced. ii. Photographs Photographs will be prepared with large-format negatives of exterior and interior views, or historic views, where available. Historic ancillary structures and landscape features will also be photographed. All negatives and prints will be processed to meet archival standards. Page 5

iii. Written Data A substantive and detailed report with a narrative description of the historic building, ancillary structures, landscape features, discussion of the significance, and historical context will be prepared. 2. The mitigation activities in Stipulation III.A.1 will commence during the design phase of the Project and will be submitted to the SHPO, Orange County Regional History Center, and Apopka Historical Society no later than eighteen (18) months after the completion of the design phase for this portion of the Project. B. In order to mitigate the Project impacts that will occur, OOCEA/FDOT will ensure the following activities are undertaken: 1. Perform a feasibility assessment on the ability to relocate the main Strite House, the historic garage and water tower. Once the feasibility assessment is complete, coordinate with FHWA and the SHPO on the results of the study to confirm the plan as follows: a. If feasible, and in coordination with the property owner of record or their designee, the three historic structures will be moved to a location within the parcel where the structures are currently located; b. If feasible, the new site for the three historic structures must allow for placement and use of the historic structures in a manner similar to those allowed by the original site; c. If feasible, the relocated historic structures shall be sited so that the spacing and relationship of the structures at the new site is compatible with those aspects of the former site; d. The new site must not possess historical and archaeological resources that would be adversely affected by the siting of the historic structures. Page 6

2. Ensure that the historic structures are moved to the new site in accordance with the approaches recommended in Moving Historic Buildings (John Obed Curtis, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1979), by a professional mover who has demonstrated the capability to properly move historic structures. 3. Ensure that the historic structures are rehabilitated on the exterior to meet the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1999). 4. If feasible, historic landscape materials from the original Strite House property should be relocated and placed at appropriate locations on the new site. Any historic landscaping that is installed shall be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1999). 5. Landscape screening shall be installed at the new site as a buffer for potential visual impacts between the historic structures and the Wekiva Parkway facility. Any new landscaping that is installed shall be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1999). 6. The mitigation activities in Stipulations III.B.1-5 will commence within eighteen (18) months of the right-of-way acquisition of property from within the Strite House boundaries. 7. Within ninety (90) days after the historic structures are moved, OOCEA/FDOT will prepare a re-evaluation of their eligibility for inclusion in the National Register in accordance with the applicable provisions of 36 CFR 60 and applicable National Park Service guidelines. This reevaluation will be submitted to FHWA for transmittal to the SHPO for review. Page 7

8. A Preservation Covenant or Easement shall be developed in consultation with OOCEA/FDOT, FHWA, the SHPO, and the property owner of record or their designee to ensure protection of the historic structures following commencement of relocation and rehabilitation. 9. Any documents or information provided to the SHPO by FHWA will be subject to review and comment by the SHPO. C. Should the owner of the Strite House choose to relocate or rehabilitate the structures in a manner that does not meet the requirements listed in Stipulation III.B, public funds will not be expended on the relocation and rehabilitation efforts. In the event that Stipulation III.B cannot be met, OOCEA/FDOT will summarize the issues and submit the information to FHWA for transmittal to the SHPO, pursuant to Stipulation VII.C. D. If it is not feasible for the historic structures to be moved and rehabilitated in accordance with Stipulations III.B.1-5., OOCEA/FDOT shall inform the SHPO through FHWA, and may demolish the structures after providing the SHPO a sufficient opportunity to comment and completing the documentation outlined in Stipulation III.A. IV. Public Recognition and Education A. A historic resources survey shall be conducted by OOCEA/FDOT, which will document the resources located in the historic rural areas of Orange County, including Zellwood, Bay Ridge, and Rock Springs. The boundaries of the survey area, which were developed in consultation with the SHPO, Orange County Regional History Center, and the Apopka Historical Society, are Ponkan Road to the south, Orange County line to the north, U.S. 441 to the west, and C.R. 435 to the east (a map showing the boundaries is provided in Appendix A). As part of this survey, a context of the historic communities will be developed, and historic resources that are fifty (50) years and older will be documented with Florida Master Site File forms and their significance will be evaluated according to criteria established by the National Register. The overall intent of this survey will be the development of a comprehensive inventory and assessment of the survey area s remaining historic rural Page 8

resources. The final report document and associated Florida Master Site File forms will be provided to FHWA for distribution to the SHPO, the Orange County Regional History Center, and the Apopka Historical Society. V. Archaeological Monitoring/Discoveries A. In consultation with the SHPO and FHWA, OOCEA/FDOT will ensure efforts to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to any discoveries of significant archaeological resources during the Project shall be addressed according to 36 CFR 800.13(b). All records resulting from archaeological discoveries shall be in accordance with 36 CFR 79, and shall be submitted to the SHPO through FHWA. B. Should unmarked human remains be encountered during construction of the Project, OOCEA/FDOT will ensure that they are treated in accordance with Chapter 872.05, Florida Statutes. VI. VII. Professional Qualifications A. All documentation of historic properties pursuant to this agreement shall be conducted by or under the direct supervision of a person or persons meeting the Secretary of the Interior s Professional Qualifications Standards (Code of Federal Regulations 36 CFR Part 61) in the fields of History, Architectural History, or Historical Architecture; and that all archaeological work is carried out by or under the direct supervision of a person or persons meeting the Secretary of the Interior s Professional Qualifications Standards (Code of Federal Regulations 36 CFR Part 61) in the field of Archaeology. Administrative Stipulations A. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (Council) will be consulted only when the project activity involves a National Historic Landmark or when there is dispute between review agencies. B. Any party to this agreement may propose to the other parties that it be amended, whereupon the parties will consult and consider the amendment pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(c)(7). Page 9

C. Should any party to this agreement object within thirty (30) days after receipt to any plans, specifications, contracts, or other documents provided for review pursuant to this agreement, or to the manner in which this agreement is being implemented, FHWA shall consult with the objecting party to resolve the objection. If, after initiating such consultation, FHWA determines that the objection cannot be resolved through consultation, FHWA shall forward all documentation relevant to the dispute to the SHPO, and, as appropriate, the Council. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of all pertinent documentation, the SHPO and/or Council will either: 1. Provide FHWA with recommendations, which FHWA will take into account in reaching a final decision regarding the dispute; or 2. Notify FHWA that the SHPO or Council will comment pursuant to 36 CFR 800.7 and proceed to comment. Any comment provided in response to such request will be taken in to account by FHWA in accordance with 38 CFR 800.7(c) with reference to the subject of the dispute. 3. Any recommendation or comment provided by the Council will be understood to pertain only to the subject of the dispute; FHWA s and OOCEA s/fdot s responsibilities to carry out all of the actions under this agreement that are not the subject of the dispute will remain unchanged. Page 10

APPENDIX A: BOUNDARIES OF HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY AREA

Boundaries of Survey Area