Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts fax

Similar documents
Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts fax

APPENDIX G: TOWN ORDINANCE REVIEW

understanding Green Infrastructure In Zoning

NEPONSET WATERSHED TOWN BYLAWS AND REGULATIONS THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH PROPER STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY REGULATORY IMPEDIMENT GAP ANALYSIS TOOL

Prepared for: Central Coast Low Impact Development Initiative centralcoastlidi.org

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE

Low Impact Development

LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT TOOLS FOR VERMONT TOWNS

Introduction to Low Impact Development. Dr Kathy Chaston Coral & Coastal Management Specialist NOAA Office of Ocean & Coastal Resource Management

Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Standards Manual. RIDOT Workshop. Design Strategies: How to Meet Minimum Standard No. 1 July 13, 2011

Appendix D - Technical Design Criteria for BMPs

APPENDIX A. Proposed Guidance and LID checklists for UConn and Town of Mansfield

Importance of Master Planning Marcy Colclough

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

NEWPORT NEWS/WILLIAMSBURG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DESIGN AND SUSTAINABILTY GUIDELINES

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

Community LID Workgroup Issue Paper #6

A LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT MANUAL FOR COASTAL SOUTH CAROLINA TABLE OF CONTENTS

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

STORMWATER GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLANNING/ZONING BOARDS

GREEN ON THE HORIZON. Challenges of Integrating LID into New Development. Southeast Stormwater Association

Landscaping Standards

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES

Tennessee Stormwater Management Program. Stormwater Management Site Assessment and Inventory Checklist. Quick Check o Vicinity Map within Watershed

WAYNE GLEN (also known as the Richter Property) A model Low Impact Development (LID) community.

Map Reading 201: Where Does the Water Go?? Map Reading Map Reading 201. Interconnected Systems

STORM WATER UTILITY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

COMPLETE GREEN STREET CHECKLIST

Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2007 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 1967

Retrofitting Commercial Shopping Centers

Guidelines and Princi les FINANCIAL ACTION SUMMARY

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

DRAFT DESIGN CRITERIA STORMWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS CITY OF OVERLAND PARK

Presented By: Matt Roberts and Cass Chapman The University of Minnesota Law School Environmental Sustainability Clinic

Charles County, MD Low Impact Development (LID)/ Environmental Site Design (ESD) Ordinance & Design Manual

PREPARED UNDER. The 319 Nonpoint Source Pollution Grant Program FUNDED BY. MA Department of Environmental Protection Boston, MA PREPARED BY

4. CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT

Chapter 2: Strategies for Local Governments Chapter 3: Site Assessment and Design for Low Impact Development. Break Out Group 10:30 am to 12 pm

Introduction to Low Impact Development. Fred Milch. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council

Appendix 3-D LOCAL CODE AND ORDINANCE REVIEW AND EVALUATION

Michael Clark, P.E. & Michael Moonan, RLA Weston and Sampson Engineers & David Lachance Woodbury Ridge Developer

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 2, 2016

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT. MEMORANDUM To: From:

Title 11 Streets and Sidewalks

J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A.

Wrentham Planning Project 2013

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

F. Driveways. Driveways which provide access to off-street parking or loading from public streets shall comply with the following:

LID CASE STUDY DESIGN WORKSHOP HSG B/D SOIL EXAMPLE SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION WITH OUTPARCEL

Urban Stormwater: Best Practice Environmental Management Guidelines. CSIRO This electronic edition published by CSIRO PUBLISHING, 2006.

City of Yelm. Tahoma Terra Final Master Plan Development Guidelines. Table of Contents

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS

Appendices: Glossary. General Terms. Specific Terms. Low Impact Development Approaches Handbook

Town of Windham. Planning Department 8 School Road Windham, ME voice fax

Zoning Design Standards. Low Impact Development Code Update Thurston County Planning Commission March 2, 2016

Low Impact Development Guidance Manual

SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES Drainage Design Options for street right of ways.

Kittson Parkway / Watershed Park Parking Lot

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

PAVING PARKING AREAS AND ROADS DESCRIPTION. Alternate Names: Pavement Practices, Impervious Paving

Chapter 6. Green Streets

12/7/2007. Christopher B. Burke Engineering West, Ltd Aux Sable Creek Watershed Plan Update 1

City of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods

Appendix G. Detailed Design

The open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape..

Review of Northwood s Stormwater Management Regulations Northwood, New Hampshire

Green Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Technologies

Stormwater Management Techniques WMPF LAND USE TRAINING INSTITUTE MARCH 14, 2018

Low Impact Development. Charlene LeBleu Auburn University Landscape Architecture (334)

Costs Design Construction Operation Maintenance

D. Landscape Design. 1. Coverage Intent: To provide adequate landscaping materials that enhance the appearance of development projects.

Scorecard. WaterQuality. Appendix B USEPA WATER QUALITY SCORECARD APPENDIX B

CHAPTER 11 SITE DESIGN AND LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT

Nonpoint Education for Municipal Officials. Linking Land Use to Water Quality. Partnership for Environmental Technology Education

New Development Stormwater Guidelines

Stormwater Control Plan: Small (Tier 1) Land Development Project

Reducing Runoff with Green Infrastructure. Lake George, NY May 5, 2011

Cost Effective Low Impact Development

County of Fairfax, Virginia

PROP. 84 REMOVING BARRIERS TO LID: MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATE ASSISTANCE CASE STUDY: CODE UPDATES IN ARCATA

Low Impact Development Code Update and Integration Training

Christopher J. Webb, PE. Chris Webb & Associates, Inc., PS, Bellingham, WA

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

Green Infrastructure Overview

From and

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

ATTACHMENT A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES Cahill Associates Environmental Consultants

Interpreting and Using the RI Site Specific Soil Mapping Standards and Procedures

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

CHAPTER 26 LANDSCAPING (Chapter added in its entirety 05-08)

Collaborating on Environmental Conservation

Response to Comments (July 28, 2010 Oregon City Determination of Application Completeness Memo)

92 Minnesota Stormwater Manual

Coffee Creek Park Development Low Impact Development (LID)

Costs Design Construction Operation Maintenance

Exercises: Using LID Feasibility Worksheets

Transcription:

Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02111 617-451-2770 fax 614-482-7185 www.mapc.org Serving the 101 Cities and Towns in the Metropolitan Boston Region MEMORANDUM TO: Elaine Lazarus, Planning Director, Town of Hopkinton FROM: Christine Wallace, P.E., Senior Regional Planner, MAPC DATE: RE: Low Impact Development Evaluation: Suggested Revisions to Existing Bylaws and Regulations As the final component of MAPC s stormwater technical assistance project funded by MET, this memorandum evaluates the town of Hopkinton s existing local bylaws and regulations to assess their consistency with Low Impact Development (LID) principles. This review is intended to identify areas of the town s local codes that could be modified to promote stormwater management that encourages recharge and employs techniques such as LID. In addition, this memorandum also provides recommendations on how to modify existing codes in the event that design standards or criteria conflict with the recently adopted Stormmwater Bylaw. MAPC has reviewed the following Town of Hopkinton Bylaws and Regulations for this memorandum: Town of Hopkinton Bylaw (Chapter 210 of the Hopkinton General Bylaws), last revised May 5, 2008 Town of Hopkinton Rules and Regulations Relating to the Subdivision of Land, last revised June 16, 2003 Town of Hopkinton Wetlands Protection Bylaw (Chapter 206 of the Hopkinton General Bylaws), last revised May 5, 2008 Town of Hopkinton Wetlands Protection Regulations, last revised June 16, 2003 Town of Hopkinton Board or Health Code of Regulations, last revised August 9, 2007 The Subdivision Rules and Regulations and the Bylaw would benefit from modifications designed to promote the use of lower impact site design and stormwater management techniques. In general such modifications would reduce impervious area, incorporate more LID stormwater practices (such as bioretention, infiltration, vegetated swales, and filter strips), and better preserve open space. The Open Space and Landscape Preservation Development (OSLPD)for subdivisions allowed in the Town s follows many LID principles, but these principles are not required for subdivisions if clustering is not chosen by the developer. The review also found that the Bylaw, Subdivision Rules and Regulations, and Wetlands Regulations have statements that do not necessarily conflict with the new Bylaw, but do not reflect the fact that the stormwater bylaw exists. Table 1 below provides more specific recommendations on how to further promote LID in the town of Hopkinton. Please note that the order of the list is based on general categories and not necessarily the order in the codes. Jay Ash President Michelle Ciccolo Vice President Grace S. Shepard Treasurer Marilyn Contreas Secretary Marc D. Draisen, Executive Director

Table 1: Suggested Revisions to Hopkinton s Bylaws and Regulations to Further Promote Low- Impact Development Principles Reference Topic Existing Requirement Recommendations 8.2.3 8.2.2 8.2.3 8.2.5.B. 8.2.5.C. 8.2.5..1.1. Edge Treatment ROW Design Layout Non-Residential street width required is 30 feet. Major street is 24 feet. Minor street is 22 feet. Rural street is 20 feet. Granite curb or cape cod berm required on all streets and cul-de-sacs. The minimum width of street rights-of-way shall be 50 feet unless otherwise specifically allowed by the Board. The Board may require street rights-of-way, which in its judgment, may become major or nonresidential streets to be more than 50 feet in width. Minimum paved diameter required is 90 feet for industrial and commercial, and 80 feet for residential. Landscaped islands in culde-sacs are allowed, but there are no provisions allowing for stormwater management. alternate layouts of 5 feet required. Grass strip of at least 3.5 feet required between pavement and sidewalk. No provisions for alternate walkway networks No provisions for permeable sidewalk materials No provisions in the Subdivision Regulations for driveway widths pervious materials two-track driveways Residential road widths should be minimized as much as possible. Lowdensity residential should be 18-22 feet wide. Allow narrow widths where there are no houses, buildings, intersections, or where on-street parking is not anticipated. Curb and gutters should not be required for residential streets. If protection of the roadway edge is a concern, permit alternate methods such as perforated curbs, flush curbs, or other mechanisms. 50 feet is appropriate for a ROW width, but consider making it a maximum rather than a minimum. Utilities should be allowed underneath the pavement. Minimum diameter should ideally be 70 feet, but up to 90 feet is also acceptable. A landscaped island inside should be permitted for all cul-de-sacs, and should allow for vegetated stormwater management in the island. Alternative layouts, such as hammerheads or one-way loop streets, should be allowed on short streets in low-density residential areas. Minimum sidewalk width should be 4 feet or less. Consider removing this requirement to reduce ROW width and to allow for alternate drainage options. Alternate pedestrian networks should be allowed to substitute for sidewalks where applicable. Permit use of permeable surfaces for sidewalks. Minimum driveway width should be 9 feet for one-way and 18 feet for two-way. Pervious materials should be allowed for single-family home driveways. Two-track driveways should be allowed for single-family driveways. Page 2 of 5

7.4.4. 8.4.2 8.4 8.4.10 8.4.10.B.3. 210-119.1.A 11.C. Shared Open Space Lot Driveways Common shared driveways in the Subdivision Regulations Park land required. The minimum amount of land to be reserved shall consist of 1 acre for each subdivision under 25 acres, and for subdivisions over 25 acres in area, reservations of open space shall total 1 acre plus 4% of the total land area over 25 acres. Systems Catch basins, manholes, and piping required for conveyance. Basins shall be designed Basins shall be designed access driveways from the street to parking lots shall not be less than 24 feet in width. If the access driveway will be one-way, a narrower dimension may be proposed A driveway within a wetland resource area shall be a minimum of 12-feet in width Common driveways may be permitted in an open space and landscape preservation development, provided that each common drive serves no more than two lots. Shared driveways should be allowed in residential developments. Add language such as: Low impact stormwater management techniques such as bioretention areas, rain gardens, vegetated swales, and filter strips may be located within the open space area and count towards the requirement. If the Bylaw jurisdiction ever consider adding the language: criteria and design standards shall also be in accordance with the Town of Hopkinton and Erosion Control Bylaw where applicable. Alternate, open-section drainage methods and materials should be allowed. Design criteria should be established for swales alongside the road for stormwater treatment. Consider revising the size of the stormwater basin to be not for the 100-year storm event, but for the 10-year and to be evaluated for the 100-year in accordance with the MA Regulations. This section only specifies for the design of stormwater basins, however, there should also be design standards for low-impact development stormwater practices such as bioretention, vegetated swales, filter strips, and rain gardens. Minimum driveway width should be 9 ft. for 1-way and 18 ft for 2-way. Minimum driveway width should be 9 ft. for 1-way and 18 ft for 2-way. Consider allowing the use of common driveways for up to four residences in any residential district. Page 3 of 5

.A.(2). Article XVII 106 Ratios Ratios Compact Spaces Pervious Setbacks and Frontages Lawn Impervious Area Limits Clustering Required spaces are minimums. No provision for reduction if near mass transit for standard subdivisions in parking lots containing more than 50 parking spaces, 20% of such parking spaces may be for small car use pervious parking lot materials Standard dimensional requirements for varying zoning districts. Open Space and Landscape Preservation Developments (OSLPD) ( Article XVII) and the Open Space Mixed Use Development Overlay District (OSMUD) ( Article XXVI) allow reduced dimensions and lot areas. lawn extent limits impervious limits in lowdensity areas. However, a special permit is required in the Water Resource Protection District if a lot has the greater of15% or 2500 SF of impervious area. ( 70.C.1) Open Space and Landscape Preservation Development (OSLPD) is allowed in place of standard subdivisions. It may be required by the Board for subdivisions larger than 10 acres (per 126.1 Consider having parking ratios be a maximum rather than a minimum Ratio should be reduced if mass transit nearby Commercial parking lots should recommend or require at least 30% compact spaces. Consider lowering threshold to less than 50 parking spaces. Pervious materials should be allowed for stalls and spillover areas. Add language such as: Pervious materials such as porous pavers, paving stones, reinforced grass, and pervious pavement may be allowed in lower volume stalls or overflow parking areas. For standard subdivisions and some commercial areas, minimize setback distances in order to increase flexibility for building location and permit reduction in frontage where appropriate (such as OSRD, around cul-de-sacs, at outside sideline of curved streets) to reduce road length and paved areas, and increase open space. Establish limits of extent of lawn area on residential lots, either by area or by percentage of lots. In low-density areas, consider establishing limits on impervious lot coverage (i.e. 15 %). (Not appropriate for town centers or moderate density neighborhoods where compact development should be encouraged). Should be a by-right form of development (no special permit required). Page 4 of 5

210..D. 210.121.1.D. Article XX Site Plan Review Wetlands Regulations 5.3 Wetlands Regulations 5.9 Landscaping for Lots Landscaping for nonresidential uses in residential areas Conservation: Incentives Landscaping and Screening Buffers are required for a non-residential use in Residence A, B, Lake Front or Agricultural district. Pedestrian and bicycle trails may be located within buffer areas. No current provisions of conservation incentives No stormwater provisions Performance Criteria for Subdivision Roadways and Lots All stormwater runoff systems shall practices in parking islands, landscaped areas and setbacks should be allowed or required. Add language such to this section as: Low impact stormwater management techniques such as bioretention areas, rain gardens, vegetated swales, and filter strips may be located within the landscaped areas and count towards the requirement. practices in buffers should be allowed. Add language such to this section as: Low impact stormwater management techniques such as bioretention areas, rain gardens, vegetated swales, and filter strips may be located within the landscaped areas and count towards the requirement. Should be incentives to developers or landowners to conserve non-regulated land (i.e. open space design, density bonuses, stormwater credits, lower property tax rates) If the Bylaw jurisdiction ever consider adding another section with the language: criteria and design standards shall also be in accordance with the Town of Hopkinton and Erosion Control Bylaw where applicable. If the Bylaw jurisdiction ever consider adding another section after 5.3.4 with the language: criteria and design standards shall also be in accordance with the Town of Hopkinton and Erosion Control Bylaw where applicable. If the Bylaw jurisdiction ever this section may need to be revised. Language should be added such as: criteria and design standards shall also be in accordance with the Town of Hopkinton and Erosion Control Bylaw where applicable. Page 5 of 5