MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

Similar documents
CITY OF CHARLOTTE PID: DB/PG: ZONED: R-5 NC STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION PID: DB/PG: ZONED: R-5

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018

*/ * ELIZABETH AVE AC AC NS O-2 MUDD(O) MUDD(O) COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL

REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional)

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis September 17, 2018

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

PLANNING STAFF REVIEW

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

B. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks

CHAPTER SPECIAL PURPOSE AND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS

*/ * ELIZABETH AVE AC AC NS O-2 MUDD(O) MUDD(O) COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL

Rezoning Petition Post-Hearing Staff Analysis July 31, 2018

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation August 1, 2017

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation May 30, 2017

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

The petition proposes to renovate two existing buildings in order to allow a mix of uses as permitted in MUDD (mixed use development).

Design Guidelines for Residential Subdivisions

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier: , ,

CITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET

Rezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis June 18, 2018

TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF. August, MOUNTLAKE TERRACE TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS August,

BOULEVARD AND PARKWAY STANDARDS

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay

PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BLOCK C OF THE MT. DIABLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Adopted by Design Review Commission February 4, 2004

The petition proposes the development of five townhomes on a vacant parcel between Charlotte Latin School and Providence Presbyterian Church.

3.4 REL: Religious Use District

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018

Urban Design Brief. 875 Wellington Road. Proposed One-Storey Fast Food Restaurant and Two-Storey Restaurant. Wellington Harlech Centre Inc.

MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Division 9 Southwood Ranch (CR 484/475/475A Corridor-Gateway Development Overlay) Purpose and Intent Applicability.

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

U.S. Highway 377 North Overlay District. 1. General Purpose and Description

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

PROMENADE SHOPPING CENTER, LLC RZ-1 REZONING PETITION NO LEGEND: DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY: TECHINCAL DATA SHEET SEAL

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

ARTICLE RRCO RED ROCK CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT

Building and Site Design Standards

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis March 19, 2018

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016

THIRD STREET PROJECT - REZONING PETITION

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on January 14, 2010, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

The petition proposes to rezone 3.17 acres to allow all uses in the TOD-M (transit oriented development mixed-use) district.

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT

CHAPTER 11 HC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT

Prepared by: LCT Design Group, LLC 401 North Franklin Street, Suite 5S Chicago, Illinois 60610

Rezoning Petition Post-Hearing Staff Analysis February 5, 2019

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

CHAPTER FIVE COMMUNITY DESIGN

5.1 Commercial and Industrial Development. (Effective April 1, 2006)

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES

Eastcreek Farm. Planned Development Standards September, 2014

ORDINANCE NO. 14,767

Major Development Plan

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF NORTHVIEW FUNERAL HOME HIGHBURY AVE N, LONDON, ON

CASE NUMBER: 16SN0701 APPLICANT: Hanky, LLC

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

Urban Planning and Land Use

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018

CHAPTER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation October 3, 2017

Central Village Design Guidelines Westport, MA

City of Aurora Planning Department DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL DISPENSING STATION. August 3, 1998

Duplex Design Guidelines

The Highway Overlay District applies to an area within the City of Papillion's zoning jurisdiction described as:

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

ZONING AMENDMENT & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: April 4, 2013

CITY OF GARDEN CITY. Garden City Design Review Committee Staff Contact: Chris Samples STAFF REPORT: DSRFY Page 1

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis October 15, 2018

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier:

Golden Gate Downtown Center Commercial Overlay District (GGDCCO).

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist

5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and,

Request Change in Nonconformity. Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

Morgan s Subdivision Historic District Character-defining Features

Harmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending, Project Development Plan/Final Development Plan - FDP #130021

CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Special Permit Application No.

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier: , ,

LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE PASADENA PLANNING DEPARTMENT (713) FAX (713)

Urban Design Brief December 23, 2015 Southside Construction Group Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment

Urban Design Brief 1576 Richmond Street City of London

Transcription:

N MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C- FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER 04-00 Project No. 496 Issued Revised SCALE: " = 0' N 0 0 0 40 RZ. c

GENERAL PROVISIONS: a. SITE LOCATION. THESE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FORM A PART OF THE TECHNICAL DATA SHEET ASSOCIATED WITH THE REZONING PETITION FILED BY METROPOLITAN RESIDENTIAL, LLC TO ACCOMMODATE DEVELOPMENT OF A BUILDING CONTAINING MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS UNITS AND/OR A HOTEL ON AN APPROXIMATELY ±.0 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH KINGS DRIVE AND METROPOLITAN AVENUE (THE "SITE"). b. ZONING DISTRICT/ORDINANCE. DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE WILL BE GOVERNED BY THE REZONING PLAN AS WELL AS THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE ZONING ORDINANCE (THE ORDINANCE ). UNLESS THE REZONING PLAN ESTABLISHES MORE STRINGENT STANDARDS, THE REGULATIONS ESTABLISHED UNDER THE ORDINANCE FOR THE MUDD-O ZONING CLASSIFICATION SHALL GOVERN ALL DEVELOPMENT TAKING PLACE ON THE SITE, SUBJECT TO THE OPTIONAL PROVISIONS PROVIDED BELOW. c. GRAPHICS AND ALTERATIONS. THE DEPICTIONS OF THE USES, SIDEWALKS, STRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS, AND OTHER SITE ELEMENTS SET FORTH ON THE REZONING PLAN SHOULD BE REVIEWED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THESE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THE ULTIMATE LAYOUT, LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND SITE ELEMENTS DEPICTED ON THE REZONING PLAN ARE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND SITE ELEMENTS PROPOSED, AND THEY MAY BE ALTERED OR MODIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SETBACK, YARD AND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH ON THIS REZONING PLAN AND THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, ANY SUCH ALTERATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS SHALL NOT MATERIALLY CHANGE THE OVERALL DESIGN INTENT DEPICTED ON THE REZONING PLAN. CHANGES TO THE REZONING PLAN NOT PERMITTED BY THE REZONING PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS ALLOWED BY SECTION 6.07 OF THE ORDINANCE. NOTE: THESE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS REPLACE AND SUPERSEDE THE PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPROVED AS PART OF THE PRIOR REZONING PETITION FOR THIS SITE.. OPTIONAL PROVISIONS. a. TO ALLOW THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTED ON THE SITE TO HAVE A BUILDING HEIGHT OF UP TO 85 FEET. b. TO ALLOW UP TO TWO () DETACHED SIGNS FOR THE SITE WITH 6 SQUARE FEET OF SIGN AREA AND UP TO FIVE (5) FEET IN HEIGHT. DETACHED SIGNS MUST BE LOCATED BEHIND THE REQUIRED SETBACK. d. HOW THE BUILDING ON THE SITE WILL ADDRESS THE ADJOINING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES HAS BEEN DIVIDED INTO THREE FRONTAGE TYPES: GREENWAY ENTRY, PARK PROJECTION AND URBAN EDGE. ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES AND CONCEPT IMAGERY FOR EACH OF THESE BUILDING FRONTAGE TYPES HAS BEEN INCLUDED WITH THIS PETITION. e. ON THE AREA OF THE BUILDING LABELED GREENWAY ENTRY ON THE REZONING PLAN THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES SHALL BE APPLIED: PROVIDE AN OPEN, INVITING AND DYNAMIC ARRIVAL EXPERIENCE THROUGH THE USE OF; LARGE PERCENTAGE OF GLASS, DECORATIVE PAVERS, STYLISH CANOPY WITH LIGHTING, LANDSCAPE PLANTERS AND A MIX OF MATERIALS TO DESIGNATE AN ARRIVAL SPACE. A MINIMUM OF 60% OF THE GREENWAY ENTRY FRONTAGE SHALL BE DESIGNED WITH CLEAR GLASS TO ALLOW VISIBILITY OF THE ACTIVITY WITHIN THE BUILDING. ALONG THE GREENWAY ENTRY FRONTAGE SEVERAL AREAS OR ONE AREA FOR OUTDOOR SEATING TOTALING A MINIMUM OF 00 SQUARE FEET WILL BE PROVIDED (THIS WILL BE IN ADDITION TO THE URBAN OPEN SPACE AREA LOCATED ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND GENERALLY DEPICTED ON THE SHEET RZ-.), THESE AREAS WILL BE DESIGNED TO OVERLOOK THE ABUTTING SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY. THE SERVICE SIDE OF THE BUILDING MAY NOT BE LOCATED ALONG THE GREENWAY ENTRY FRONTAGE. DISPLAY CASES/WINDOWS WILL NOT BE PART OF THE GREENWAY ENTRY FRONTAGE FAÇADE TREATMENT. SEVERAL CONCEPT IMAGES INDICATING HOW THIS GREENWAY ENTRY TREATMENT COULD BE ACCOMPLISHED ARE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING PLAN. f. ON THE AREA OF THE BUILDING LABELED PARK PROJECTION A AND B ON THE REZONING PLAN THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES SHALL BE APPLIED: DELIVER AESTHETIC CONTINUITY WITH THE EXISTING MIDTOWN PARK BY PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING TREATMENTS AT THE PEDESTRIAN LEVEL TO ENHANCE THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE: (I) LAYERS OF PLANTINGS AT GRADE; AND (II) ATTRACTIVE AND INTERESTING LOUVERS, THE TREATMENT WILL THEN TRANSITION UP THE FAÇADE INTO STANDARD SCREENING MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MUDD ZONING REGULATIONS. IN ADDITION THE PETITIONER WILL WORK WITH COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION TO PROVIDE AN ARCHITECTURAL RESPONSE TO THE EXISTING ARTWORK IN THE MIDTOWN PARK. CONCEPT IMAGES INDICATING HOW THIS PARK PROJECTION A AND B TREATMENT COULD BE ACCOMPLISHED ARE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING PLAN. 0. AMENDMENTS TO THE REZONING PLAN : a. FUTURE AMENDMENTS TO THE REZONING PLAN (WHICH INCLUDES THESE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) MAY BE APPLIED FOR BY THE THEN OWNER OR OWNERS OF THE APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT AREA PORTION OF THE SITE AFFECTED BY SUCH AMENDMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 6 OF THE ORDINANCE.. BINDING EFFECT OF THE REZONING APPLICATION : a. IF THIS REZONING PETITION IS APPROVED, ALL CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE IMPOSED UNDER THE REZONING PLAN WILL, UNLESS AMENDED IN THE MANNER PROVIDED UNDER THE ORDINANCE, BE BINDING UPON AND INURE TO THE BENEFIT OF THE PETITIONER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS OF THE SITE AND THEIR RESPECTIVE HEIRS, DEVISEES, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES, SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST OR ASSIGNS. N c. TO ALLOW EACH TENANT AND/OR USE LOCATED ON THE SITE TO HAVE UP TO TWO WALL SIGNS WITH UP TO 400 SQUARE FEET OF SIGN SURFACE AREA, LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BUILDING (TOP OF THE BUILDING TO BE DEFINED AS THE UPPER THREE FLOORS OF THE BUILDING INCLUDING THE PARAPET WALL). d. TO ALLOW WALL SIGNS BELOW THE UPPER THREE FLOORS WITH UP TO 00 SQUARE FEET OF SIGN AREA OR 5% OF THE WALL AREA TO WHICH THEY ARE ATTACHED, WHICHEVER IS LESS. THE PETITIONER WILL SUBMIT A SIGNAGE PACKAGE TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AS PART OF THE MUDD APPROVAL PROCESS FOR THE SITE. THE SIGNAGE PACKAGE THAT IS SUBMITTED WILL PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE NUMBER, SIZE AND TYPE OF SIGNS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE SITE. ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS OF DEVIATIONS FROM THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF THE WALL SIGNS SPECIFIED IN THIS SECTION MAY BE GRANTED BY THE PLANNING STAFF, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC SIGN DESIGN, LOCATION AND PLAN, FOR UP TO A 5% INCREASE IN ALLOWED SQUARE FOOTAGE OR WALL SPACE PERCENTAGE IN LIGHT OF UNIQUE, UNUSUAL AND/OR SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR FEATURES. d. TO ALLOW A DIGITAL WALL SIGN ON THE BUILDING WALL ADJACENT TO MID-TOWN PARK WITH UP TO 00 SQUARE FEET OF SIGN AREA. THE DIGITAL WALL SIGN MAY BE USED TO: (I) ADVERTISE AND IDENTIFY TENANTS AND MERCHANDISE LOCATED AND SOLD AT METROPOLITAN (METROPOLITAN TO BE DEFINED AS THE AREA INCLUDED IN REZONING PETITION NO. 005-060); (II) EVENTS OCCURRING AT MID-TOWN PARK AND ON THE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY; (III) AS WELL AS A SCREEN FOR MOTION PICTURES (E.G. MOVIES, TV SHOWS AND THE LIKE); AND (IV) TO PROMOTE MAJOR EVENTS, MAJOR EVENTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, RELIGIOUS, EDUCATIONAL, CHARITABLE, CIVIC, FRATERNAL, SPORTING, OR SIMILAR EVENTS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, GOLF TOURNAMENTS, FESTIVALS, AND MAJOR OR SEASONAL SPORTING EVENTS. THE DESIGN/CONTENT OF SIGNS DISPLAYED ON THE DIGITAL WALL SIGN WILL CONTAIN PREDOMINANTLY GRAPHIC IMAGES (A MINIMUM OF 80% OF THE SIGN MUST BE COMPOSED OF INTERESTING AND UNIQUE ART LIKE GRAPHIC IMAGES); COPY AREA WILL BE LIMITED TO 0% OF THE SIGN AREA. THIS DIGITAL WALL SIGN MUST BE USED TO PROMOTE EVENTS OCCURRING AT MID-TOWN PARK, SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY AND MAJOR EVENTS AS DEFINED ABOVE A MAJORITY OF THE TIME THE SIGN IS IN USE. e. TO ALLOW DIGITAL WALL SIGNS ALONG THE PORTION OF THE BUILDING WALL THAT FACES S. KINGS DRIVE AND THE FIRST 0 LINEAR FEET OF THE BUILDING WALL THAT FACES METROPOLITAN AVENUE. THE DIGITAL WALL SIGNS ALONG THESE BUILDING WALLS WILL BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE SIGN FACE AREA OF 00 SQUARE FEET OF SIGN AREA. THESE DIGITAL WALL SIGNS MAY BE USED TO: (I) ADVERTISE AND IDENTIFY TENANTS AND MERCHANDISE LOCATED AND SOLD AT METROPOLITAN (METROPOLITAN TO BE DEFINED AS THE AREA INCLUDED IN REZONING PETITION NO. 005-060); (II) EVENTS OCCURRING AT MID-TOWN PARK AND ON THE SUGAR CREEK GREENWAY; AND (III) TO PROMOTE MAJOR EVENTS, MAJOR EVENTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, RELIGIOUS, EDUCATIONAL, CHARITABLE, CIVIC, FRATERNAL, SPORTING, OR SIMILAR EVENTS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, GOLF TOURNAMENTS, FESTIVALS, AND MAJOR OR SEASONAL SPORTING EVENTS. THE DESIGN/CONTENT OF THE SIGNS DISPLAYED ON THE DIGITAL WALL SIGN WILL CONTAIN PREDOMINANTLY GRAPHIC IMAGES (A MINIMUM OF 80% OF THE SIGN MUST BE COMPOSED OF INTERESTING AND UNIQUE ART LIKE GRAPHIC IMAGES); COPY AREA WILL BE LIMITED TO 0% OF THE SIGN AREA. NOTE: THE OPTIONAL PROVISIONS REGARDING SIGNS ARE ADDITIONS/MODIFICATIONS TO THE STANDARDS FOR SIGNS IN THE MUDD DISTRICT AND ARE TO BE USED WITH THE REMAINDER OF MUDD STANDARDS FOR SIGNS NOT MODIFIED BY THESE OPTIONAL PROVISIONS.. PERMITTED USES & DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS: a. SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND CONVERSION RIGHTS LISTED BELOW, THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTED ON THE SITE MAY BE DEVELOPED WITH UP TO 55 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS AND/OR A HOTEL WITH UP TO 75 HOTEL ROOMS TOGETHER WITH ACCESSORY USES ALLOWED IN THE MUDD ZONING DISTRICT. g. THE PETITIONER WILL ENDEAVOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION TO PROVIDE CERTAIN SHARED SITE ELEMENTS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO; BATHROOMS, GATHERING SPACE, OUTDOOR SEATING AREAS, AREAS FOR STORAGE AND LANDSCAPING. THE SHARED SITE ELEMENTS MAY BE LOCATED ON THE SITE AND/OR THE ADJOINING PARK PROPERTY. IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THESE SHARED SITE ELEMENTS THE SITE'S PROPERTY LINES MAY BE ADJUSTED OR EASEMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THE ZONING BOUNDARY FOR THE SITE WILL NOT BE MODIFIED BY A SHIFT IN THE PROPERTY LINE TO ACCOMMODATE SHARED SITE ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. h. ON THE AREA OF THE BUILDING LABELED URBAN EDGE ON THE REZONING PLAN THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES SHALL BE APPLIED: PROVIDE AN ARTICULATED FAÇADE WITH A MIX OF MATERIALS INCLUDING MASONRY, PRECAST CONCRETE, LOUVERS AND PANELS, PROVIDE DECORATIVE OPENINGS AT THE GROUND LEVEL AND SCREEN PARKING ON ALL LEVELS. CREATE A PEDESTRIAN SCALE EDGE AT THE GROUND FLOOR WITH DISPLAY CASES/WINDOWS, AWNINGS, INTEGRAL PLANTERS AND OTHER FEATURES THAT WILL COMPLEMENT THE OTHER PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING AND THE FOCAL POINT FEATURE DESCRIBED BELOW. A FOCAL POINT FEATURE WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE URBAN EDGE FRONTAGE AT THE CORNER OF S. KINGS DRIVE AND METROPOLITAN AVENUE; THIS FOCAL POINT FEATURE MAY INCLUDE SIGNAGE, ART WORK, A WATER FEATURE, LANDSCAPING AND OTHER ELEMENTS TO CREATE A POINT OF INTEREST ALONG THE KINGS DRIVE PORTION OF THE URBAN EDGE FRONTAGE. THE DESIGN OF THE FOCAL POINT FEATURE WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT AS PART OF THE MUDD REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE SITE. SEVERAL CONCEPT IMAGES INDICATING HOW THIS URBAN EDGE TREATMENT COULD BE ACCOMPLISHED ARE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING PLAN. i. IF DISPLAY CASES/WINDOWS ARE USED ALONG THE URBAN EDGE OR THE PARK EDGE A AND B THE GRAPHICS WILL BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF THREE () FEET FROM THE BACK OF THE WINDOW. j. BUILDING SERVICE AREAS WILL BE LOCATED INTERNALLY AND SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH MASONRY WALLS A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET IN HEIGHT. k. ALLOWABLE BUILDING MATERIALS WILL INCLUDE: BRICK, NATURAL STONE, ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHED PRECAST CONCRETE, DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS, ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELS, GLAZING, STUCCO AND TILE CLADDING. THE FOLLOWING EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS ARE PROHIBITED: VINYL SIDING, UNFINISHED CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS. l. METER BANKS WILL BE INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING. m. ROOF TOP HVAC AND RELATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW AT GRADE. n. COMPACTOR/DUMPSTER AREAS AND RECYCLING AREAS WILL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING. * DISPLAY CASES/WINDOWS WILL BE DEFINED AS: ANY FENESTRATION (I.E. AN OPENING IN THE EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL ALLOWING LIGHT AND VIEWS BETWEEN THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) ENCASED OR ENCLOSED BY AN INTERIOR WALL FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISPLAYING IMAGES, MERCHANDISE, ART WORK OR OTHER ITEMS OR IMAGES OF INTEREST THAT ARE VISIBLE FROM THE ADJOINING STREET (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE) OR OPEN SPACE AREAS. MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE REZONING NOTES COMPONENT C- FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER 04-00 Project No. 496 Issued b. UP TO 5 ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE SITE BY CONVERTING ONE () ALLOWED HOTEL ROOM INTO ONE () ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL UNIT. 6. STREETSCAPE, BUFFERS, LANDSCAPING, URBAN OPEN SPACE AND UTILITY STRUCTURE SETBACKS: c. UP TO 5 ADDITIONAL HOTEL ROOMS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE SITE BY CONVERTING ONE () ALLOWED RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT INTO ONE () ADDITIONAL HOTEL ROOM. 4. ACCESS, TRAFFIC AND CONSTRUCTION PARKING/STAGING: a. A 6 FOOT SETBACK AS MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF THE EXISTING CURB ALONG SOUTH KINGS DRIVE WILL BE PROVIDED. b. THE PETITIONER WILL PROVIDE A PLANTING STRIP AND A SIDEWALK ALONG THE SITE'S FRONTAGE ON SOUTH KINGS DRIVE AS GENERALLY DEPICTED ON THE REZONING PLAN AND MATCHING EXISTING STREETSCAPE THROUGHOUT METROPOLITAN. Revised a. VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE SITE AND TO THE PARKING FACILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUILDING WILL BE FROM SOUTH KINGS DRIVE AND METROPOLITAN AVENUE AS GENERALLY DEPICTED ON THE REZONING PLAN. c. ALONG METROPOLITAN AVENUE THE PETITIONER WILL PROVIDE A SIDEWALK WITH STREET TREES TO MATCH EXISTING STREETSCAPE TREATMENT IMPLEMENTED THROUGHOUT METROPOLITAN AS GENERALLY DEPICTED ON THE REZONING PLAN. b. THE PLACEMENTS AND CONFIGURATIONS OF VEHICULAR ACCESS POINTS ARE SUBJECT TO ANY MINOR MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE FINAL SITE AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND DESIGNS AND TO ANY ADJUSTMENTS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL BY CDOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PUBLISHED STANDARDS. d. URBAN OPEN SPACE AREAS WILL BE PROVIDED ON THE GROUND FLOOR ALONG THE GREENWAY ENTRY PORTION OF THE BUILDING AS WELL AS ON AN UPPER FLOOR OF THE BUILDING. c. THE ALIGNMENT OF THE INTERNAL VEHICULAR CIRCULATION AND DRIVEWAYS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE PETITIONER TO ACCOMMODATE CHANGES IN TRAFFIC PATTERNS, PARKING LAYOUTS AND ANY ADJUSTMENTS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL BY CDOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PUBLISHED STANDARDS. d. ABOVE GROUND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS WILL BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND WILL BE LOCATED BEHIND THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK OR THE REQUIRED MUDD SETBACK WHICH EVER IS GREATER. d. THE PETITIONER RECOGNIZES THAT DUE TO THE LIMITED SPACE AROUND THE SITE AND EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD CONSTRAINTS, A PORTION OF CONSTRUCTION PARKING AND MATERIAL STAGING WILL NEED TO BE LOCATED OFF-SITE. THE LOCATION(S) FOR CONSTRUCTION PARKING AND MATERIAL STAGING WILL BE SUBMITTED TO CDOT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL AS PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES: a. THE PETITIONER SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CHARLOTTE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED AND ADOPTED POST CONSTRUCTION CONTROLS ORDINANCE. 5. ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES: a. ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES ARE BEEN PROVIDED TO HELP DEFINE THE VISION FOR THE SITE'S ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER. CONCEPT IMAGERY HAS ALSO BEEN PROVIDED TO GIVE EXAMPLES OF BUILDING DESIGN AND QUALITY. THIS CONCEPT IMAGERY IS INTENDED ONLY TO ILLUSTRATE EXAMPLES OF A BUILDING FAÇADE THAT MEETS THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES AND IS NOT A SPECIFIC OR BINDING BUILDING ELEVATION, NOR ARE THEY A FULL LIST OF POSSIBILITIES. b. THE SITE WILL COMPLY WITH THE TREE ORDINANCE. 8. SIGNAGE: a. SIGNAGE AS ALLOWED BY THE ORDINANCE AND BY THE OPTIONAL PROVISIONS LISTED ABOVE MAY BE PROVIDED. b. A RECOGNIZABLE BUILDING BASE SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGH MATERIAL TRANSITIONS AND BUILDING ARTICULATION. c. BUILDING FACADES SHALL BE DESIGNED TO REDUCE THE MASS, SCALE, AND UNIFORM MONOLITHIC APPEARANCE OF LARGE UNADORNED WALLS, WHILE PROVIDING VISUAL INTEREST. LARGE BUILDING FACADES SHALL BE DIVIDED INTO DISTINCT MASSING ELEMENTS. THE PARKING DECK PORTION OF THE BUILDING WILL BE DESIGNED SO THAT OPENINGS INTO PARKING DECK, OTHER THAN DRIVEWAYS, MUST BE FILLED WITH DECORATIVE LOUVERS, LANDSCAPING OR OTHER SIMILAR TREATMENTS SO THAT CARS PARKED WITHIN THE DECK ARE SCREENED. 9. LIGHTING: a. ALL NEW LIGHTING SHALL BE FULL CUT-OFF TYPE LIGHTING FIXTURES EXCLUDING LOWER, DECORATIVE LIGHTING THAT MAY BE INSTALLED ALONG THE DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, AND PARKING AREAS. b. DETACHED LIGHTING ON THE SITE WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 FEET IN HEIGHT. c. NO "WALL PAK" LIGHTING WILL BE ALLOWED, HOWEVER ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SCONCES, UP LIGHTING, ACCENT LIGHTING, INCLUDING COLOR ACCENT LIGHTING AND DECORATIVE LIGHTING ON THE BUILDING FACADES WILL BE PERMITTED. RZ. c

GREENWAY ENTRY Provide an open, inviting and dynamic arrival experience through the use of:. Large percentage of clear glass, minimum of 60%. Decorative pavers, landscape planters. Stylish canopy with lighting 4. Outdoor seating, minimum of 00SF 5. Mix of materials to designate an arrival space 5 5 4 Metropolitan Component C- Parcel Rezoning Petition 04-00

PARK PROJECTION Deliver aesthetic continuity with the existing Midtown Park by using:. Layers of plantings at grade and on lower level building elevation to enhance pedestrian experience (SECTION A). Transitioning up the façade into standard screening materials in accordance with code. Potential for shared site elements with County P&R including bathrooms, gathering space, outdoor seating areas, storage and landscaping (SECTION B) Metropolitan Component C- Parcel Rezoning Petition 04-00

URBAN EDGE Create a stylish, memorable and highly visible element from:. Articulated façade with a mix of materials including masonry, precast concrete, louvers and panels. Decorative openings at ground level, screened parking on all levels. Focal point feature on primary corner Metropolitan Component C- Parcel Rezoning Petition 04-00