Retrofit of the Gwinnett County DWR Facility Using Low Impact Development Practices SESWA 2012 Annual Conference October 19, 2012

Similar documents
Green Infrastructure & Low Impact Development

Appendices: Glossary. General Terms. Specific Terms. Low Impact Development Approaches Handbook

NEORSD Green Infrastructure Grant (GIG) Program Opening Remarks

Green Infrastructure Overview

Post-Construction BMPs

Selecting Appropriate Stormwater Control Measures for Your Development Project

Using Runoff Reduction Practices to Shrink the Water Quality Volume (WQv) September 18, 2018 Jay Dorsey

Sustainable Stormwater Retrofit Best Practices

GREEN ON THE HORIZON. Challenges of Integrating LID into New Development. Southeast Stormwater Association

Stormwater BMP and Stream Restoration in a City Park. Jeff Herr P.E., D.WRE Jill Stachura

Types and Basic Design of Post-Construction BMPs

C.3 STORMWATER TECHNICAL GUIDANCE. Table of Contents. Glossary... viii. Chapter 1 Introduction/How to Use this Handbook

Appendix D - Technical Design Criteria for BMPs

Stormwater Control Plan: Small (Tier 1) Land Development Project

Attachment 2: Permeable Pavement Design Guidelines

Structural Stormwater Best Management Practices

Post Construction BMP Inspection. Scott Taylor, P.E. Stormwater

Preparing a Stormwater Control Plan for a Small Land Development Project

SMALL PROJECTS SIMPLIFIED APPROACH

Time Value of Money and Optimization Process

Page 19 L.L.C. (Previously the United Salad Co. Garage) 939 SE Alder St.

Rain Gardens Water Quality the Way Mother Nature Intended

Karen Wiggen, RLA PGM/Planning Bob Harrington, P.E. PGM/CPIS Michael Clar, P.E. - ECOSITE

NON-PRIORITY PROJECT WATER QUALITY PLAN (NPP)

Green Infrastructure in the Greater Lansing Area

4. CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT

12/31/2014 County of Mendocino s Low Impact Design Standards Manual v1.0 A P P E N D I X 8. Site Design Measures. 32 P a g e

6.1 Bioretention Areas

Green Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Technologies

SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR SMALL PROJECTS

Site Design for Protecting Water Quality 2013 Award Winning Projects

Case Study: Dallas Green Infrastructure for Stormwater

WEFTEC.06. ** City of Caldwell, Idaho

County of Prince Edward. Stormwater Management Plan. Agreement in lieu of a Stormwater Management Plan

6.2 Flow-Through Planter

Retrofitting Low Impact Development (LID) for Stormwater at Sacramento State. City of Sacramento Sacramento State Facilities Management

My Soil Won t Drain, Can I Still Use LID? Rob Buchert, John Knutson, Erik Pruneda

Highlights from WERF Stormwater Research and Future Opportunities

Low Impact Development at Naval Facilities: Opportunities and Constraints

Planning, Design, and Construction of Green Infrastructure.

Slow it, Spread it, Sink it using Green Stormwater Infrastructure

Retrofitting Commercial Shopping Centers

Intentionally Left Blank

State Water Board s Post Construction Stormwater Calculator. Instructions for El Centro

Impervious Cover Assessment and Reduction Action Plan for Woodstown, New Jersey

J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A.

Post-Construction Stormwater Management Checklist* (5,000 SF or Greater)

2014 Southeast NY Stormwater Conference October 15, John Dunkle, PE, CPESC, CMS4S

Stormwater Technical Guide

Stormwater Management Techniques WMPF LAND USE TRAINING INSTITUTE MARCH 14, 2018

Can Urban Redevelopment Restore Aquatic Resources

Chapter 6. Green Streets

Small Town Sustainable Stormwater Solutions

Why and How to Evaluate the Feasibility of Infiltrating or Harvesting and Using Stormwater. Laura Prickett, EOA, Inc.

CHAPTER 11 SITE DESIGN AND LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT

Urban Rain Gardens: Capturing our local water. Martha Berthelsen The Watershed Project

Bioretention cell schematic key

Going Green with the NYS Stormwater Design Standards

Introduction to Low Impact Development. Fred Milch. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council

Costs Design Construction Operation Maintenance

LID/GI and BMP Case Studies

County of Fairfax, Virginia

INTRODUCTION TO GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE HOW WE CAN PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES AND OUR WATERS Maywood Public Library Bergen County, New Jersey

3. Are there any projects exempt from the definition of Regulated Projects?

Two Sides of the Green Infrastructure Coin. Jaren Hiller, PE, LEED AP Nathan Guequierre

Local Stormwater Retrofit Case Studies. Westmoreland County Conservation District Updated 11/2011

Development of LID Design Guide in Edmonton

Charles County, MD Low Impact Development (LID)/ Environmental Site Design (ESD) Ordinance & Design Manual

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

Ken Kortkamp, PE San Francisco Public Utilities Commission San Francisco, CA

Green Infrastructure Stormwater Management Options in an Ultra-Urban Redevelopment. Sandy Doyle-Ahern

Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Best Management Practices

Planning and Design: Applied LID Techniques Redevelopments, Housing, Mixed Use, Infrastructure

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY DRAINAGE FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS WITH ONE OR TWO UNITS REVISED JANUARY 4, 2018

Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for City of Vineland, Cumberland County, New Jersey

Homeowners Guide to Stormwater BMP Maintenance

Rebecca Dohn October 13, 2017

Managing Stormwater within the Road Right-of-Way: An Urban NAI Approach

Building Green: An Update on Atlanta's Green Infrastructure Approach

West Virginia Stormwater Management Manual: Methods.

Horsley Witten Group Sustainable Environmental Solutions. Rich Claytor, P.E. Janet Bernardo, P.E. horsleywitten.com

Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Newark, Essex County, New Jersey Volume 3

Stormwater Low Impact Development - A Natural Solution

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE

Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for West New York, Hudson County, New Jersey

Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for West Long Branch Borough, Monmouth County, New Jersey

Jill Stachura STORMWATER BMP AND STREAM RESTORATION IN A CITY PARK. October 2013 Southeast Stormwater Association Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC

Putting a LID on Stormwater Pollution. Michele Loudenback, RPES Stormwater Enforcement Water Quality Division

Small Project Guidance Document

Proposed Credit Program

RETAINING RUNOFF AT ITS SOURCE

New Tools/Resources for

Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Newark, Essex County, New Jersey Volume 2

From and

Green Infrastructure Incentives. Abby Hall EPA Headquarters Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation

HEALTH SCIENCES BUILDING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Storm Water Managament at the University of Michigan

Example Stormwater Control Plan For a Residential Subdivision Project. Whispering Pines Lane Anytown, USA. February 21, 2018

Monitoring Flow and Quality for Stormwater Control Measures

LID Permit Requirements. Lisa Austin. Geosyntec Consultants

Transcription:

Retrofit of the Gwinnett County DWR Facility Using Low Impact Development Practices SESWA 2012 Annual Conference October 19, 2012 Jeff Herr, P.E., D.WRE National Stormwater Leader jherr@brwncald.com

Acknowledgements Steve Leo, Director, Stormwater Management Division, Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources Pete Wright, Stormwater Management Division, Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources Chuck Graham, Stormwater Management Division, Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources Jill Stachura, Project Manager, Brown and Caldwell

Federal LID Requirements are Expected New EPA stormwater treatment requirements will likely include volume reduction (use of LID practices). Requires newly developed and redeveloped federal facilities (> 5000 sq ft) to provide MEP volume reduction (focus on LID practices) for the 95 th percentile storm, typically 1.5 2.0 inches.

Project Objectives Determine if it is possible to infiltrate and store/reuse on-site the runoff from the 95 th percentile storm event Determine effectiveness of different LID practices Determine construction and operation and maintenance requirements for infiltration and storage/reuse facilities Determine capital, O&M and life cycle costs for different types of LID practices Use constructed project to educate developers, engineers, and the public on the use of LID practices Promote the use of viable LID practices in Gwinnett County

Project Site Aerial Photograph ~31 acres total, 18.5 acres impervious, 60% impervious. Decided only the immediate site would be used for treatment; no off-site treatment. Wanted to demonstrate LID can be used for any level of imperviousness allowed by County code; residential, commercial, or industrial.

Completed Project Site Drainage Sub-Basin Delineation

Developed Historical Annual Rainfall Probability Distribution for Atlanta 1.73 inch event = 95 th % Total average annual rainfall = 49.6 inches.

Performed Subsurface Testing and Evaluated Site Soil Types

Completed In-Situ Infiltration Testing at Proposed Bottom of Engineered Soils Measured infiltration rate = 1 to 6 inches per hour at 6-8 ft below existing grade; proposed bottom elevation of infiltration practices.

Goal to Include at Least One of Each of These LID Practices in the Design

Initially Evaluated Three Different LID BMPs per Sub- Basin Evaluated effectiveness for runoff volume reduction and cost.

Developed Three Alternative Overall Site Retrofit Plans- Alternative A

Unit Capital, O&M, and Life Cycle Costs Units Capital Cost ($) Annual O&M Cost ($) LID Practice Bioretention area $/sq.ft. 5 40 0.2 2.00 Rain garden $/sq.ft. 5 40 0.28 2.00 Green roof $/sq.ft. 15 25 0.54 1.00 Vegetated swale $/sq.ft. 2 7 0.05 0.50 Filter strip $/LF 40 400 10 40 Planter boxes $/box 2,500 10,000 250 1,000 Cisterns HDPE $/gal 0.70 1.40 0.05 0.20 Cisterns Concrete $/gal 1.50 5.00 0.05 0.40 Permeable asphalt $/sq.ft. 5 15 0.05 0.50 Porous concrete $/sq.ft. 6 20 0.05 0.50 Grass pavers $/sq.ft. 5 10 0.05 0.50 Concrete paver blocks $/sq.ft. 8 15 0.05 0.50 Planting Trees/Urban forestry $/tree 200 1,000 10 30 Hydrodynamic devices $/device 10,000 100,000 2,000 8,000

Preliminary Plan LID Practices Utilized

Estimated Runoff Volumes and Load Reductions for Sub-Basins and Project Site

Final Preliminary Plan Met with all DWR Department Managers and incorporated comments.

Moving Forward Estimated Construction Cost = $1,000,000 Estimated Annual O&M cost = $90,000 Submitted 319 (h) grant application to GA EPD; Requested $600,000 with $400,000 local match Post construction monitoring proposed for each type of LID practice Construction of Phase I (bioretention area and roof rainwater harvesting system) completed in July 2011 using another 319 (h) grant

Rain Barrel and Garden

Phase I Construction Completed in one month, July 2011

Pre-Construction Site Area Drainage area = 1 ac Impervious area = 0.7 ac (parking area) Parking drains to one curb inlet. 0.3 acre raised grass area available. Curb inlet for parking area

Excavation and Underdrain Installation Excavated area for engineered soils (3-4 ft) and loosened soil to a depth 2 ft. below proposed bottom of engineered soils. Installed 6-inch HDPE underdrain and gravel trench with 15-inch risers.

Engineered Soils and Gravel Backfill Installed engineer soils in 1 ft lifts and watered to consolidate. Installed gravel trenches across area to aid in runoff distribution.

Backfill Completion and Final Grading Installed remaining engineered soils in 1 ft lifts and watered to consolidate. Final surface grading 3-5H:1V slopes.

Surface Treatment Cobble, mulch, plants and sod

Completed Project Frequent watering was initially required due to sandy soils. Installed a 5,000 gallon tank next to building and roof rainwater harvesting system in September for watering bioretention. (1-inch rain = 1,000 gallons of water)

Completed Project Rainwater Harvesting 5,000 Gallon Storage and Irrigation Reuse

Completed Project 3-inch tall curb around inlet; runoff overflows into curb inlet when pond is full. Underdrain and risers have closed valve; Installed to be used only if pond does not infiltrate naturally. Construction cost = $100,000 Primary cost was engineered soil purchase. New curb Existing Inlet New curb cuts

May 2012

Monitoring WERF LID Study

Plan Refinement and 319 Grant Application Submitted new 319 grant application for retrofit of remaining front portion of site $666,000 total/$400,000 grant Announcement March 2013 Contract awarded October 2013

Questions Jeff Herr, P.E., D.WRE jherr@brwncald.com 770-673-3673