Trout Lake (DOW # )

Similar documents
Serpent Lake (DOW # )

Latimer Lake (DOW # )

Aquatic Vegetation of Norway Lake (DOW ) Cass County, Minnesota May 27 and 28, 2008

Upper South Long Lake (ID # ) and Lower South Long Lake (ID # )

Farm Island Lake (DOW # )

Aquatic Vegetation Survey of Boy Lake (DOW ) Cass County, Minnesota

Aquatic Vegetation Surveys of Pleasant Lake (DOW ) Cass County, Minnesota

Fish Trap Lake (ID # )

Aquatic Vegetation of Big Swan Lake Todd County, Minnesota (DOW ) June 3, 4, 15, 2004

Aquatic Vegetation of Grace Lake (DOW ) Hubbard County, Minnesota July 24 and 25, 2006

Aquatic Vegetation of Edward Lake Crow Wing County, Minnesota (DOW ) July 8, 9, 14, 26; August 2, 2004

Aquatic Vegetation of Ten Mile Lake (DOW ) Cass County, Minnesota June 2006

Aquatic vegetation of Grand Lake

Aquatic vegetation of Roemhildts Lake

2015 Aquatic Plant Surveys

Aquatic Vegetation Survey of Upper, Middle and Lower Cullen Lakes Crow Wing County, Minnesota 2007

Aquatic vegetation of Cross Lake

To whom it may concern:

Aquatic Vegetation of Big Pine Lake

Aquatic vegetation of Whitefish Lake

Aquatic Vegetation of Round Lake

Lake Mansfield 2012 Aquatic Vegetation Survey

memo Project Name Spider Lake Point Intercept Survey 2017 Date 9/5/17 To / Contact info Jerry Spetzman Cc / Contact info Greg Graske, PE

2017 Assessment of Native Plants in Treatment Plots

Aquatic Vegetation of Little Sand Lake ( ) and Sand Lake ( ) Cass County, Minnesota July 11-12, 2006

Aquatic Vegetation of George Lake

Aquatic vegetation of Pelican Lake

WELCOME. Scott Provost Water Resources Specialist - WDNR Wisconsin Rapids, WI

Aquatic Macrophyte Survey for Lower Turtle Lake Barron County, Wisconsin WBIC:

memo Project Name Little Lake Point Intercept Survey 2017 Date 9/5/17 To / Contact info Jerry Spetzman Cc / Contact info Greg Graske, PE

Aquatic Vegetation of Ban Lake St. Louis County, Minnesota (DOW ) August 3-4, 2004

Aquatic Vegetation of Borden Lake

Designation of Critical Habitat Areas Bear Lake, Portage County. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Eau Claire, WI

Saugus River Watershed Invasive Aquatic Vegetation Assessment

Aquatic Macrophyte Survey of the St. Croix/Gordon Flowage Douglas County, Wisconsin JANUARY 2008

Wycamp Lake Aquatic Plant Survey 2006 by Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council

Fact Sheet Series Potamogeton crispus 1 CURLY LEAF PONDWEED. An Invasive Plant heading towards Manitoba: Potomogeton crispus

Public Information Meeting on Aquatic Plant Management: Lakes Mendota, Monona, Wingra, Waubesa, and Kegonsa. October 2 and 9, :00-8:30 p.m.

Identification and Control of Common Invasive and Nuisance Vegetation in Stormwater Management Systems

APPENDIX E AQUATIC WEED CONTROL. Revision 5

Fact Sheet Series 1 FLOWERING RUSH. An Invasive Plant Found in Manitoba: Butomus umbellatus

Project Initiated by: Burnett County Land and Water Conservation Department, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, and the Ham Lake Association

RappFLOW Pond Workshop

Curly-leaf Pondweed and Full Warm Water Point/Intercept Macrophyte Surveys Fawn Lake Spider Chain (WBIC: ) Sawyer County, Wisconsin

2015 Report. Adirondack Aquatic Regional Response Team. Adirondack Watershed Institute Paul Smith s College P.O. Box 265 Paul Smiths, NY 12970

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes. Introduction. Workshop for Property Owners. Photo by Jane Herbert

Myriophyllum aquaticum. Parrot feather milfoil

Designation of Critical Habitat Areas Jacqueline Lake, Portage County. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Eau Claire, WI

Aquatic Plant Surveys in the Bureau of Land Management, Medford District,

Flowering Rush (Butomus umbellatus)

Phase 1 Habitat Replacement & Reconstruction

Wisconsin NRCS Direct Volume Method Bank Recession Rate Categorizations

The Effects of the Contact Herbicide Diquat on Mixed Stands of Flowering Rush and Hardstem Bulrush in Lake Sallie, Minnesota 2015

Eleanor Burkett. Smart Landscaping to prevent spread of AIS

Lake Nokomis Shoreline Enhancement Project

NW SE 42 wetland

Plant Propagation Protocol for Potamogeton amplifolius ESRM 412 Native Plant Production

1l1nt"erett~of ltoronto Stubtee 16fologfcaI senee, ne. 39

Natural Shorelines. for Inland Lakes. A Landowner s Guide to using. to STABLIZE SHORELINES, Michigan s inland lakeshore.

Module 1 ~ Silent Invaders (MS/HS) Emersed Plants Reading Activity

Guidelines for Designing Wildlife Friendly Ponds

A Field Guide to Common Aquatic Plants of Pennsylvania

A Cooperative Effort Between:

Meadowbrook Condominium Association c/o Mr. Scott Locke 7868 Ashbrook Drive Haslett, MI

NEIGHBORHOOD WATER RESOURCES ENHANCEMENT GRANT OPPORTUNITIES

Lake Ogallala Bathometric Project

Lakefront Revegetation

las vegas wash coordination committee

Maintaining Your Sparkle. Maintenance Issues. by Kathy Danforth

PLANTS FOR LAKEFRONT REVEGETATION

Cold Water Curly-leaf Pondweed and Full Warm Water Point-Intercept Aquatic Macrophyte Surveys Kirby Lake (WBIC: ) Barron County, Wisconsin

2012 Lake Puckaway EPS Planting Report Andrew Sabai November 2012

Common Name: KRAL S WATER-PLANTAIN. Scientific Name: Sagittaria secundifolia Kral. Other Commonly Used Names: Little River water-plantain

Habitat Improvements to the Motor Island Shoreline in the Upper Niagara River, NY: A Collaborative Approach

Hunts Point Landing, Bronx, New York

Quantitative Plant Surveys: Arcadia and Metacomet Lakes

How to Design A Better Wildlife Garden

BASS PONDS, MARSH, & WETLAND HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT

Aquatic Weed Management: Control Methods

Gregory J. Bugbee Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station Department of Environmental Sciences Invasive Aquatic Plant Program

Final Coastal Lakes Aquatic Plant Survey Report

LICENSES FOR UTILITY CROSSINGS OF PUBLIC LANDS AND WATERS ACCORDING TO MINNESOTA RULES CHAPTER [Rules Effective July 1, 2004]

In addition to adding height, color and texture to your pond / water garden...

Problem aquatic plants

Floating Wetlands Pilot Project:

( THE M4 CORRIDOR AROUND NEWPORT )

Water plants. function. management AND

Service Learning Project. Bender Park

Environmental Laboratory. Propagation and Establishment of Native Plants for Vegetative Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems ERDC/EL TR-13-9

BACKYARD POND. Backyard Pond. A pond or water garden will likely become the focal point for all your backyard conservation.

Mosquito Control Guidelines

Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation November 2017

Polpis Bike Path. General Impacts: 1.47 acres forested, marsh, shrub swamp

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Herb Robert (Geranium robertianum) (Family Geraniaceae Geranium Family)

Community Conservation Workshop. Lake Placid

Syfeld Keene Associates

Floating Wetlands EMPACTS

Site Preparation. What to Look for in a Vegetation Implementation Plan. Plant Community Goals (restoration checklist) Plant Community Goals

Community Conservation Workshop. Saranac River Basin Communities

Draft Mayflower Lake Management Plan. Goal: Reach a balance between high quality, unimpeded recreation and a healthy, balanced aquatic plant community

Transcription:

Aquatic Vegetation Survey of Trout Lake OW #31-0216-00) Itasca County, Minnesota 2005 Trout Lake. 2005 COPYRIGHT Minnesota epartment of Natural Resources 2009

Report by: onna Perleberg Aquatic Plant cologist) and Stephanie Loso Aquatic Biologist) Minnesota epartment of Natural Resources ivision of cological Resources 1601 Minnesota r. Brainerd, MN 56401 Phone: 218.833.8727 mail: donna.perleberg@dnr.state.mn.us Lakewide sampling 2005): onna Perleberg, Aquatic Plant cologist Josh Knopik, Student Intern Michele Mattson, Student Intern Cody Peterson, Student Intern Funding: Collection of these data was made possible by support from the Heritage nhancement Fund and Game and Fish Fund. A note to readers: Text that appears in blue underline is a hypertext link to a web page where additional information is provided. If you are connected to the Internet, you can click on the blue underlined text to link to those web pages. This report is also available online at: http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/pubs_aquatics/veg_reports.html This report should be cited as: Perleberg, and S. Loso. 2009. Aquatic vegetation of Trout Lake OW 31-0216-00) and, Itasca County, Minnesota, 2005. Minnesota epartment of Natural Resources, cological Resources ivision, 1601 Minnesota r., Brainerd, MN 56401. 18 pp. Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 2 of 18

Summary An aquatic vegetation survey of Trout Lake 31-0216-00), Itasca County, Minnesota, was conducted in July and August 2005. The survey included a lakewide assessment of vegetation and water depths at 891 sample stations within the shore to 25 feet depth zone. A total of 30 native aquatic plant species were recorded including six emergent, three floatingleaved, three free-floating and 18 submerged plants. Non-native aquatic plants have not been documented in the lake. Aquatic plants occurred around the entire perimeter of the lake and vegetation was present in 74% of the sample sites. mergent and floating-leaved plants were generally restricted to depths of five feet and less. Within that depth zone, 31% of the survey sites contained at least one emergent or floating-leaf plant. Beds of hard-stem bulrush Schoenoplectus acutus) occurred on sandy substrates and waterlily beds Nymphaea odorata and Nuphar variegata) were found within protected bays. Submerged plants were found to 24 feet but plant occurrence was highest in depths from shore to 15 feet zone, where 89% of the sites contained vegetation. In depths of 16 to 25 feet, plant occurrence was 12%. The most frequently occurring species were muskgrass Chara sp.) 35% occurrence), coontail Ceratophyllum demersum) 31%), star duckweed Lemna trisulca) 19%), narrow-leaved pondweeds Potamogeton spp.) 12%), and northern watermilfoil Myriophyllum sibiricum) 11%). Vegetation survey crew on Trout Lake, 2005 Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 3 of 18

Introduction Figure 1. Location of Trout Lake in Minnesota. Trout Lake is located in Itasca County, northeastern Minnesota, in the Mississippi River - Grand Rapids Watershed Figure 1). There are about 270 lakes in this watershed and about 440 lakes in Itasca County that are at least 50 acres in size. Trout Lake is the sixth largest lake in the watershed and the 16 th largest lake in the county, with a surface area of 1890 acres and 13.5 miles of shoreline. Trout Lake receives flow from Trout Creek, which enters the lake on the northeast side and outflows to the southeast where it joins the Swan River Figure 2). The Swan River continues southward about 25 miles and empties into the Mississippi River Figure 2). [_ [_ 0 30 60 Miles Itasca County Mississippi River Grand Rapids Watershed Trout Lake Figure 2. Trout Lake in Mississippi River - Grand Rapids Watershed. Trout Creek Trout Lake Other Lakes Mississippi River - Grand Rapids Watershed Swan Lake Swan River The city of Coleraine is located on the north side of Trout Lake and a city owned public beach and boat ramp are accessible from State Highway 169. A township owned public water access is on the southeast end of the lake. Most of the other shorelines are privately owned and include forested tracts and residential homes Figure 3). Trout Lake agle Wildlife Management Area WMA) connects to Trout Lake on the southeast section of the lake. Big Rice Lake ± 0 7.5 15 Miles sissippir River M is Big Sandy Lake Trout Lake is an ice-block lake with an elongated basin that is about 4.5 miles in length. It has a maximum depth of 135 feet and 23% of the lake basin is less than 15 feet in depth Figure 3). This shallow area that rings the lake shoreline is referred to as the littoral zone. Rooted submerged plants are often common in the littoral zone if Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 4 of 18

Figure 3. epth contours of Trout Lake 20 foot contour based on 2005 data). h h Water epth ft) >100 81 to 100 51 to 80 21 to 50 0 to 20 Public Access ± 0 330 660 Meters h adequate sunlight reaches the lake bottom. Trout Lake water quality, ecology and basin morphometry have been impacted by human disturbances to the watershed Heiskary 1988). From 1907 to 1940, fine ore tailings from mining operations were released into the lake Heiskary 1988). Until 1987, the wastewaters from the cities of Coleraine and Bovey were discharged into the lake Heiskary 1988). Trout Lake water quality was sampled in 1987 and found to have relatively high average total phosphorus concentrations compared to other lakes in the region Heiskary 1988). Blue-green algal blooms were reported in the summer of 1987. Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 5 of 18

The Secchi disc Figure 4) transparency measures the depth to which a person can see into the lake and provides a rough estimate of the light penetration into the water column. Between 1997 and 2006, mean summer water clarity, as measured by Secchi disc readings, was about 17 feet in Trout Lake MPCA, 2008). As a general rule, sunlight can penetrate to a depth of two times the Secchi depth and aquatic plants can grow to a depth of one and half times the Secchi depth. Based on Secchi disk measurements alone, aquatic plants are expected to grow to about 25 feet in Trout Lake. Other factors that may influence the depth of plant growth include substrate type, wind fetch, and plant species composition. Figure 4. Measuring Secchi isc transparency Previous vegetation surveys of Trout Lake found plants growing to a depth of 24 feet MnNR 1999) with abundant plant growth described within the shallow bays in 1975 and 1984. Nearly 40 different aquatic native plant taxa have previously been recorded in Trout Lake and numerous emergent plants occur along the shorelines MnNR 1999 and Myhre 2000). Non-native aquatic plants have not been documented in Trout Lake. Objectives The purpose of this vegetation survey was to provide a quantitative description of the 2005 aquatic plant population of Trout Lake. Specific objectives included: 1. stimate the maximum depth of rooted vegetation 2. stimate the percent of the lake occupied by rooted vegetation 3. Record the aquatic plant species that occur in the lake 4. stimate the abundance of common species 5. evelop distribution maps for the common species Methods Lakewide vegetation survey Trout Lake was surveyed on July 19 and August 2, 3, 2005. A point-intercept survey method was used and followed the methods described by Madsen 1999). Survey waypoints were created using a Geographic Information System GIS) computer program and downloaded into a handheld Global Positioning System GPS) receiver. Survey points were placed across the entire lake and spaced 50 meters 164 feet) apart, resulting in about one survey point per acre. Two field crews, each consisting of two surveyors and one boat, conducted the survey. Within the shore to 25 feet depth zone, a total of 891 sites were surveyed Figure 5, Table 1). Two additional sites were sampled but the data were not included in analyses because the sites occurred in water greater than 25 feet and no vegetation was found. The GPS unit was used to navigate the boat to each sample point. One side of the boat was designated as the sampling area. At each site, water depth was recorded in one-foot increments using a measured stick in water depths less than eight feet and an electronic depth finder in depths greater than eight feet. Surveyors recorded all plant taxa found within a one square meter sample site at the predesignated side of the boat. A double-headed, weighted garden rake, attached to a rope was used Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 6 of 18

to survey vegetation not visible from the surface Figure 6). Plant identification and nomenclature essentially follows The Flora of North America 1993+). Voucher specimens were collected for most plant taxa and are stored at the MnNR in Brainerd or at the University of Minnesota Herbarium in St. Paul. Figure 5. 2005 vegetation survey sites on Trout Lake. Table 1. Sampling effort by water depth. Water depth interval Trout Lake 0 to 5 407 6 to 10 229 11 to 15 81 16 to 20 95 21 to 25 79 Total sample points 891 2005 vegetation survey sites Water depth >25 feet ± 0 350 700 Meters Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 7 of 18

ata were entered into a database and frequency of occurrence was calculated for each taxon as the number of sites in which a taxon occurred divided by the total number of sample sites. Frequency was calculated for the entire area from shore to 25 feet and sampling points were also grouped by water depth and separated into five depth zones for analysis Table 1). Figure 6. Sampling rake. xample: In Trout Lake there were 891 samples sites. Muskgrass Chara sp.) occurred in 312 sites. Frequency of Muskgrass in Trout Lake = 312/891 *100) = 35% Mapping floating-leaf vegetation beds Farm Service Administration FSA) true color aerial photographs 2003-2004) were used to delineate dense beds of waterlilies. Stands of bulrush beds were not visible from photographs and were not delineated. Results istribution of aquatic plants Aquatic plants occurred around the entire perimeter of the lake Figure 7). Bands of vegetation were narrowest on the west shore where, in some areas, water depths increased sharply from shore. Areas of the east shore had broader bands of vegetation that, in some areas, extended more than 400 meters 1300 feet) lakeward. In the south end of the lake, vegetation was occasionally found on offshore, shallow sandbars. Plant distribution by water depth Plants were found to a maximum depth of 24 feet in Trout Lake. Within the shore to 25 feet zone, vegetation occurred in 74% of the sites. Percent of vegetated sites decreased with increasing water depth Figure 8). Vegetation was most common in the shore to 15 feet zone where 89% of the sites contained plants. Number of plant taxa recorded and distribution by water depth A total of 30 native aquatic plant taxa were recorded in Trout Lake in 2005, including six emergent, three floating-leaved, three free-floating and 21 submerged taxa Table 2). Several taxa that were located during the 1999 and/or 2000 surveys were not found in 2005; these species may have been present in 2005 but present in low numbers and not observed, or present but not identified to the species level. Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 8 of 18

Figure 7. istribution of aquatic plants in Trout Lake, 2005. Vegetation absent at sample sites Vegetation present at sample sites mergent and floating-leaf plant beds Water depth >25 feet Figure 8. Frequency of vegetation by water depth interval. Percent of sites with vegetation 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0 to 5 ft 6 to 10ft 11 to 15 ft 16 to 20 ft 21 to 25 ft Water epth ± 0 350 700 Meters Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 9 of 18

Table 2. Frequency of aquatic plants in Trout Lake, July and August 2005. Frequency is the percent of sample sites in which a plant taxon occurred within the shore to 25 ft water depth.) 891 sample sites Life Form Common Name Scientific Name Frequency Located only in previous survey SUBMRG Large Algae Muskgrass Chara sp. 35 plants grow primarily under the water surface. Upper leaves may float near the surface and flowers may extend above the surface. Plants may or may not be anchored to the lake bottom. Grass-leaf rooted plants issectedleaf rooted plants Small-leaf rooted plants Broad-leaf rooted plants cabbage ) Bushyleaved plants FR-FLOATING plants drift freely with current and float near or on water surface. FLOATING plants are rooted in the lake bottom and have leaves that float on the water surface. MRGNT plants extend well above the water surface and are usually found in shallow water, near shore. Wild celery Vallisneria americana 9 Flat-stem pondweed Potamogeton zosteriformis 6 Water stargrass Heteranthera dubia 2 Coontail Ceratophyllum demersum 31 Northern water milfoil Myriophyllum sibiricum 11 Whorled water milfoil Myriophyllum verticillatum --- 2000 White water buttercup Ranunculus aquatilis 9 Water marigold Megaladonta beckii <1 Sago pondweed Stuckenia pectinata 7 Blunt-tipped pondweed Stuckenia filiformis --- 2000 Narrow-leaf pondweed Potamogeton sp.* 7 Fries pondweed Potamogeton friesii 6 Leafy pondweed Potamogeton foliosis <1 Small pondweed Potamogeton pusillus --- 2000 Straight-leaved pondweed Potamogeton strictifolius --- 2000 White-stem pondweed Potamogeton praelongus 4 Variable pondweed Potamogeton gramineus 3 Clasping-leaf pondweed Potamogeton richardsonii 2 Illinois pondweed Potamogeton illinoensis 1 Bushy pondweed Najas flexilis 3 Canada waterweed lodea canadensis 1 Marestail Hippuris vulgaris --- 1999 Star duckweed Lemna trisulca 19 Turion-forming Lemna turionifera <1 duckweed Greater duckweed Spirodela polyrhiza <1 White waterlily Nymphaea odorata 5 Yellow waterlily Nuphar variegata 1 Floating leaf pondweed Potamogeton natans 1 Floating-leaf arrowhead Sagittaria cuneata --- 2000 Hardstem bulrush Schoenoplectus acutus 10 Broad-leaf cattail Typha latifolia <1 Needlegrass leocharis acicularis <1 Spikerush leocharis sp. <1 Horsetail quisetum fluviatile --- 1999 Broad-leaf arrowhead Sagittaria latifolia --- 1999 Giant burreed Sparganium eurycarpum Present Giant cane Phragmites australis Present *Some specimens of narrow-leaved pondweeds were positively identified as Potamogeton freisii Fries pondweed) and Potamogeton foliosis leafy pondweed). However, it is not known whether other look-a-like narrow-leaf pondweed species occurred in the lake. Therefore, a separate group of unidentified narrow-leaf pondweeds Potamogeton sp.) are reported here. = plant taxa not found in 2005; present = plant taxa found in 2005 but occurred outside of sample sites. Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 10 of 18

Most emergent plant and floating-leaf plants occurred in water depths of six feet and less and most rooted submerged plants were restricted to depths of 15 feet and less Figure 9). Only seven taxa occurred in depths greater than 15 feet and only three submerged taxa occurred in depths greater than 20 feet. Figure 9. Number of taxa found at each water depth interval Number of Taxa 30 20 10 Free-Floating Submerged Floating-leaf mergent 0 0 to 5 ft 6 to 10ft 11 to 15 ft 16 to 20 ft 21 to 25 ft Water epth The number of plant taxa found at each one square meter sample site ranged from zero to eight, with a mean of one. Sites with the highest number of taxa occurred near shore, within mixed beds of emergent, floating-leaved and submerged plants Figure 10). In water depths greater than 15 feet, most sites contained fewer than two taxa. Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 11 of 18

Figure 10. Number of plant taxa at each sample site, Trout Lake, 2005 ± 0 375 750 Meters Number of Taxa 0 1 2 3 4 to 5 6 to 8 Waterlily beds Water depth >25 feet Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 12 of 18

Figure 11. Major emergent and floating-leaf beds 2005. Waterlily beds Scattered waterlilies Bulrush mergent and floating-leaf plants mergent and floating-leaf aquatic plants offer food, cover and nesting material for waterfowl, marsh birds and muskrats, and provide shelter and shade for insects and young fish, and amphibians. The root systems of emergent and floating-leaf plants protect shorelines against erosion by buffering the wave action and by holding soil in place. ± Hard-stem bulrush 0 370 740 Meters Within the shore to five feet depth zone, 31% of the survey sites contained at least one emergent or floating-leaf plant. Major plant bed types included bulrush and waterlilies Figure 11). Waterlilies were often associated with soft substrates and bulrush was more typically found on hard substrates. Schoenoplectus acutus) Figure 12) was the most common emergent in Trout Lake and was found in 10% of the sites Table 2). Bulrush was found in 21% of the sample sites between shore and the five feet depth and usually occurred in sand. Figure 12. Mixed bed of bulrush and waterlilies, Trout Lake, 2005. Waterlily beds, or mixed beds of waterlilies and emergents Figure 12), covered about 33 acres in Trout Lake. Floating-leaf plants included yellow waterlily Nuphar variegata), white waterlily Nymphaea odorata), and floating-leaf pondweed Potamogeton natans). Waterlily beds often contained scattered bulrush plants, and submerged plants. Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 13 of 18

Aquatic vegetation of Trout Lake, Itasca County, Minnesota, 2005 Submerged and free-floating plants Within the depth zone from shore to 25 feet, 72% of the sample sites contained at least one submerged or free-floating plant. The four most frequent taxa were muskgrass Chara sp.), coontail Ceratophyllum demersum), star duckweed Lemna trisulca), narrow-leaved pondweeds Potamogeton spp.), and northern watermilfoil Myriophyllum sibiricum). These species occurred in more than 10% of the survey sites Table 2) and were widespread throughout the littoral zone Figure 13). Figure 13. istribution of common submerged species in Trout Lake, 2005. ± Muskgrass 0 450 900 Meters Water depth >25 feet Narrow-leaved pondweeds Coontail Northern watermilfoil Star duckweed Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 14 of 18

Muskgrass Chara sp.) Figure 14) was the most common submerged plant in Trout Lake, occurring in 35% of the sites Table 2). Muskgrass was found around the entire shoreline and was often the only species found on off-shore shallow bars Figure 13). Muskgrass could be found growing in thick beds with no other vegetation and in other areas it co-occurred within mixed beds of pondweeds and other submerged plants. Muskgrass was the dominant plant in depths less than six feet Figure 15). Figure 14. Muskgrass This macroscopic, or large, algae is common in many hard water Minnesota lakes. It has a brittle texture and a characteristic musky odor. Because muskgrass does not form true stems, it is a low-growing plant, often found entirely beneath the water surface where it may form low carpets on the lake bottom. Muskgrass is adapted to variety of substrates and is often the first taxa to colonize open areas of lake bottom where it can act as a sediment stabilizer. Beds of muskgrass can provide important fish spawning and nesting habitat. Figure 15. Frequency of common plants by water depth interval. Trout Lake, July and August 2005. muskgrass Frequency of occurrence 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% coontail star duckweed narrow-leaf pondweeds northern watermilfoil 0 to 5 ft 6 to 10ft 11 to 15 ft 16 to 20 ft 21 to 25 ft Water epth Coontail Ceratophyllum demersum) Figure 16) occurred in 31% of the survey sites Table 2). It occurred at all depths sampled and dominated the six to 20 feet water depth zone Figure 15). Coontail grows entirely submerged and its roots are only loosely anchored to the lake bottom. It is adapted to a broad range of lake conditions and is tolerant of higher turbidity and can grow in muck substrates. Coontail is perennial and can over winter as a green plant under the ice and Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 15 of 18

then begins new growth early in the spring, spreading primarily by stem fragmentation. The finely divided leaves of this plant provide a home for insects valuable as fish food. Star duckweed Lemna trisulca) was present in 19% of the Trout Lake survey sites Table 2). It was most common in the shallow bays Figure 13) and was often found in water depths of ten feet and less Figure 15). Star duckweed Figure 17) is a freefloating species that often occurs submerged near the lake bottom but it does not anchor to the substrate and can float freely with the current. Figure 16. Coontail Figure 17. Star duckweed Narrow leaf pondweeds are rooted, perennial submerged plants with small, thin leaves. Leaves grow entirely below the water surface but flowers extend above the water. There are several species of narrow-leaf pondweeds and they can be difficult to identify if not found in flower or fruit. Fries pondweed Potamogeton friesii) Figure 18) and leafy pondweed Potamogeton Photo credit: r. Robert Freckman, foliosis) were positively identified in the lake, but Univ. Of Wisconsin-Stevens Point additional narrow-leaf species may have also been present. In Trout Lake, all narrow-leaf pondweeds were found in 12% of Figure 18. Fries pondweed the sites and were most frequently found in depths of 6 to 10 feet Figure 15). Fries pondweed was found in 6% and leafy pondweed was found in less than 1% of the sample sites Table 2). Northern watermilfoil Myriophyllum sibiricum) Figure 19) was found in 11% of Trout Lake survey sites. It was common in water depths of ten feet and less Figure 15). Northern watermilfoil was found in scattered shallow locations throughout Trout Lake Figure 13). Northern watermilfoil is a rooted, perennial submerged plant with finely dissected leaves. It may reach the water surface, particularly in depths less than ten feet and its flower stalk extends above the Figure 19. Northern watermilfoil water surface. It spreads primarily by stem fragments and over-winters by hardy rootstalks and winter buds. Northern watermilfoil is not tolerant of turbidity and grows best in clear water lakes. For information on how to distinguish this native plant from the non-native, urasian watermilfoil: identification. Other submerged species were present in less than ten% of the sample sites but their presence contributes to the Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 16 of 18

overall habitat diversity within the lake. iscussion The types and amounts of aquatic vegetation that occur within a lake are influenced by a variety of factors including water clarity, water chemistry, depth, substrate type and wave activity. The 2005 water clarity of Trout Lake was sufficiently high to allow a diversity of aquatic plant growth to a depth of about 15 feet. Beyond that depth, vegetation was sparse and was dominated by species that are more tolerant of low light conditions. The near-shore zone of Trout Lake includes a diversity of substrate types and large areas of undeveloped shorelines. This provides for a mixed habitat of bulrush beds along sandy shores and waterlily and wild rice beds in softer sediments. The abundant and diverse native aquatic plant communities found in these near-shore areas provide critical fish and wildlife habitat and other lake benefits. Click here for more information on: value of aquatic plants ). Monitoring change in the aquatic plant community can be helpful in determining whether changes in the lake water quality are occurring and for estimating the quality of vegetation habitat available for fish and wildlife communities. In general, factors that may lead to change in the aquatic plant communities include: Change in water clarity If water clarity increases, submerged vegetation are expected to expand to deeper water. A greater number of species may be found in depths of 10 to 15 feet and species like coontail may be more frequent in depths of 20 feet and beyond. Change in water level Many aquatic plants are adaptable to water level fluctuations and in low water years, aquatic plants may expand in distribution. The extent and duration of these distribution changes can be difficult to predict. Snow and ice cover Many submerged plants have the ability to grow under the ice, especially if there is little snow cover and sunlight reaches the lake bottom. In years following low snow cover, and/or a reduced ice-over period, some submerged plants may increase in abundance. Water temperatures / length of growing season In years with cool spring temperatures, submerged plants may be less abundant than in years with early springs and prolonged warm summer days. Invasive species Non-native submerged species have not been documented in Trout Lake but if they invade, they may directly or indirectly impact the native plant community. Non-native plant species, such as urasian watermilfoil Myriophyllum spicatum) or curly-leaf pondweed Potamogeton crispus) may form dense surface mats that may shade out native plants. The impact of these invasive species varies among lakes but the presence of a healthy native plant community may help mitigate the harmful effects of these exotics. Natural fluctuation in plant species abundance Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 17 of 18

Many submerged plants are perennial and regrow in similar locations each year. However, a few species such as bushy pondweed Najas flexilis) are annuals and are dependant on the previous years seed set for regeneration. Aquatic plant management activities Humans can impact aquatic plant communities directly in a variety of ways. Motorboat activity in vegetated areas can be particularly harmful for species such as bulrush and wild rice. Shoreline and watershed development can also indirectly influence aquatic plant growth if it results in changes to the overall water quality and clarity. Herbicide and mechanical control of aquatic plants can directly impact the aquatic plant community. For information on the laws pertaining to aquatic plant management, click here: MnNR APM Program or contact your local NR office. Limiting these types of activities can help protect healthy aquatic ecosystems. Literature Cited Flora of North America ditorial Committee, eds. 1993+. Flora of North America North of Mexico. 12+ vols. New York and Oxford. Heiskary S. 1988. Trout Lake MnNR I #31-0216, Itasca County. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, ivision of Water Quality, Program evelopment Section. St. Paul, MN. http://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/lakereport.html accessed February 2009). Madsen, J.. 1999. Point intercept and line intercept methods for aquatic plant management. APCRP Technical Notes Collection TN APCRP-M1-02). U.S. Army ngineer Research and evelopment Center, Vicksburg, MS. www.wes.army.mil/el/aqua MnNR Fisheries Lake Files. Minnesota epartment of Natural Resources. ivision of Fish and Wildlife, Section of Fisheries, Lake Survey Program. 500 Lafayette Rd., St. Paul, MN 55155. MPCA. 2008. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. St. Paul, MN. Lake Water Quality Assessment Program. Lake Water Quality ata Search website: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/lkwqsearch.cfm accessed January 2009) Myhre, K. 2000. Plant survey of Trout Lake 31-0216-00), Itasca County, Minnesota, July 12 and 20, 2000. Minnesota epartment of Natural Resource, cological Resources ivision. Minnesota County Biological Survey Program. unpublished data. Copyright MnNR 2009 Page 18 of 18