Natural Resources Research Summaries for National Park Service Units within the Southeast Coast Network

Similar documents
GIS inventory of watershed / landscape-scale factors that act as agents of change within SECN parks

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation March 25, 2004 LOS ANGELES GREEN VISION PLAN. File No.: Project Manager: Marc Beyeler

CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

STEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES

Beautification Advisory Committee Mission Statement and Goals & Objectives

Collaborative Conservation across Landscapes: Experiences from the Upper Midwest and Great Lakes LCC 2/29/2016. GreatLakesLCC.org

2014 South Atlantic LCC

Great Lakes Conservation Blueprint for Terrestrial Biodiversity on the Canadian Shield

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

systems is available on the Colorado Wetland Information Center (CWIC) website.

Community Conservation Workshop. Lake Placid

Santa Barbara Restoration Project Database. Cheadle Center for Biodiversity and Ecological Restoration University of California, Santa Barbara

TOWN OF BEDFORD CONSERVATION COMMISSION

OVERMOUNTAIN VICTORY TRAIL BURKE CALDELL CORRIDOR FEASIBLITY STUDY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CALDWELL COUNTY PATHWAYS

Office of Greenways & Trails Providing Statewide Leadership and Coordination. Southeast Greenways and Trails Summit October 1-3, 2017

Florida Forever Conservation Needs Assessment Overview Maps

GIS to Estimate Archaeological Site Loss and Develop Conservation Strategies

Historic Asset Management A Decision Support Process for Balanced Consideration of Mission Utility, Historic Value, and Facility Condition

Ottawa County Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. February, 2006

Master Plan for Preservation and Scenic Conservation (1995)

Infrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services. Natural Heritage Action Plan (NHAP) Project Initiation

Preface. Erie. Scranton. Allentown. Pittsburgh. Harrisburg. Philadelphia

Community Conservation Workshop. Saranac River Basin Communities

Figure 1. Proposed Strategic Habitat Conservation Areas for Florida

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Westside Creeks Restoration Plan Merit Award AECOM, Fort Collins. Planning & Urban Design

The City shall enhance and improve the accessibility of parks and recreational facilities while protecting their quality. by:

I. STAFF POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS. The following RMP policy strategies are proposed by staff in support of a Scenic Resource Protection Program:

Waco Mammoth Site Special Resource Study

Pine Flat Lake Master Plan Update FACT SHEET September 2014

When I came to Colonial National Historical Park in late 1988 as

Project Summary. Rationale

San Francisco Bay Area Upland Habitat Goals Project

Raystown Lake Master Plan Revision. Public Meeting April 25 & 26, 2018 How does the revision process work?

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group September 14, 2017

Cumberland Comprehensive Plan Town Council adopted August 2003, State adopted June 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pinellas County Greenways

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT. The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element:

Summary of Action Strategies

Texas AgriLife Extension Service

Arlington, Virginia is a worldclass

The Conservation Fund The Center for Conservation and Development

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

Environmental Hazards and Risk Management

SCIENCE AND RESEARCH INTERNAL REPORT NO.75 DATABASES AND THEIR APPLICATION TO MANAGEMENT PLANNING. W. Mary McEwen

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Monitoring for Ecological Integrity and State of the Parks Reporting

APPENDIX 1: SCOPED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) FORM

Ecosystem Restoration Business Line Budgeting A Systems Approach

TOWN OF BETHLEHEM OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION PLAN PUBLIC MEETING: OCTOBER 12, 2017

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA CHECKLIST OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION

The Landscape Project. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Fish and Wildlife Endangered and Nongame Species Program

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

Public Review Draft Oceanside Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Communities Conservation Plan

HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

COLORADO S Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning August 15, 2006

Public Hearing. Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO - Meeting Rooms A and B March 14, open house at 4 p.m., formal presentation at 5 p.m.

Intergovermental Coordination

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Preparation of National Register of Historic Places. Nominations for the following:

50-year Water & Wetland Vision for England WORKSHOP DETAILS

SECTION FOUR: MISSION STATEMENT, GOALS & OBJECTIVES

ROLE OF LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION COOPERATIVES IN EVERGLADES RESTORATION

SUMMARY. Support the Southeast Arkansas Regional Intermodal Facility.

Chapter 3: Natural Environment. Proposed Waikato District Plan Stage 1. (Notified version)

Protected Areas: Context for Planning and Management Parks Canada Perspective

Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Dawn Kamalanathan, Director, Planning and Capital Projects

Staff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.

TENDER. Subject of the tender: Field-work on verification of ecological corridors

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR Office of the City Solicitor Planning Department

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

Executive Summary. Essential Connectivity Map (Figure ES-1)

Presentation Item C Annotated Model Outline for a Framework for a Green Infrastructure Plan

FISH RESTORATION PROGRAM AGREEMENT Implementing Habitat Restoration Requirements Of The Biological Opinions

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Ashbridges Bay Erosion and Sediment Control Project

Conservation by Design: Promoting Resilient Coastal Wetlands & Communities. GreatLakesLCC.org

National Association of Conservation Districts. Kris Hoellen Vice President, Sustainable Programs The Conservation Fund September 19, 2013

NJ Department of Environmental Protection

OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2800 Watkins Lake Road, Waterford, Michigan

3-2 Environmental Systems

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

NJ Habitat Connectivity Initiative

Lower Don River West Remedial Flood Protection Project TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Executive Summary

Large Landscape Restoration and the National Park System

Township of Adjala-Tosorontio Official Plan Review. Natural Heritage

Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Clairton & Harrison Community Greening Assessment Projects Request for Proposals July 2018

Support the implementation of Cape Coral's Comprehensive Plan. Protect and utilize the unique natural resources in the City.

Appendices. Contents. Appendices - Sep 1997 CP-1 AP-1

Gulf Islands National Park Reserve Management Plan Newsletter #3

MERIDAN PLAINS SAND RESOURCE AREA

WWF International Danube-Carpathian Programme is seeking to contract an

Increasing Storm Resiliency in Urban Areas Through Ecological Restoration and Design

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

July 9, Adèle Labbé Environmental Planner City of Guelph 1 Carden Street Guelph, Ontario N1H 3A1. Dear Ms. Labbé.

Landscape Conservation Design:

Albion Hills Conservation Area Master Plan. Public Information Session

Resolution XII NOTING also that with the increasingly rapid urbanization, wetlands are being threatened in two principle ways:

Transcription:

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Southeast Coast Network Atlanta, Georgia Natural Resources Research Summaries for National Park Service Units within the Southeast Coast Network Request for Pre-Proposals and Statement of Work

Summary and Request for Pre-Proposals This project seeks to develop Natural Resource Research Summary Reports for twenty parks within the Southeast Coast Network: Canaveral National Seashore (CANA), Cape Hatteras National Seashore (CAHA), Fort Raleigh National Historic Site (FORA), Wright Brothers National Memorial (WRBR), Cape Lookout National Seashore (CALO), Castillo de San Marcos National Monument (CASA), Congaree Swamp National Monument (COSW), Fort Matanzas National Monument (FOMA), Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area (CHAT), Cumberland Island National Seashore (CUIS), Fort Frederica National Monument (FOFR), Fort Pulaski, National Monument (FOPU), Fort Sumter National Monument (FOSU), Charles Pinckney National Historic Site (CHPI), Horseshoe Bend National Military Park (HOBE), Kennesaw Mountain National Military Park (KEMO), Moores Creek National Battlefield (MOCR), Ocmulgee National Monument (OCMU), Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve (TIMU), and Fort Caroline National Memorial (FOCA). To accomplish this, the Southeast Coast Network desires to achieve the following objectives: Phase I Objectives (to be completed by May 2004): 1. Develop a report containing issue-based abstracts that summarize natural history findings, natural resources research, and management issues of importance to each park (or group of parks if jointly managed). 2. Provide a database of scientific literature and topical bibliography for each park in ProCite format. 3. Develop a list of available digital maps, sources, and metadata, and whether those maps are available publicly or for purchase. For all spatial data, this list should include the following information: date, resolution, format, metadata, and price. 4. Develop a list of available publicly available data sets. 5. Develop a list of subject-matter experts / contacts database for each topic. Phase II Objectives (to be completed by December 2004): 1. Acquire relevant GIS data and incorporate into NPS holdings. 2. Acquire relevant data sets and incorporate into relevant NPS data sets (i.e., NPSpecies). 3. Input or convert bibliographic data into NPS NatureBib database format. The Southeast Coast Network hopes to develop one or more cooperative agreements to carry out the above objectives. Interested cooperators should submit a Pre-Proposal by Friday August 8, 2003 that includes the following: 1. A concise description of research methods and proposed work schedule for completing objectives above. 2. Estimated budget itemized by line item and group of parks as outlined below. Potential applicants need not submit a proposal for work on all parks. It is possible that investigators will find it more cost effective or feasible to work on a subset of parks within a smaller geographic area to reduce travel costs, time, ease logistics, etc. (see groupings below). However, selection of final project(s) will be based partly on the cost to accomplish primary objectives at ALL parks, and the ability to achieve some or all of the secondary objectives at one or more of the parks. It is anticipated that funding for cooperative agreements to be funded under this Request for Pre-Proposals will be awarded in FY 2003 so that work can started to coincide with the Fall Semester schedule at partnering CESU schools. Funding for individual projects will be funded through a combination of FY03 and FY04 dollars. All Pre-Proposals should be directed by email to Joe DeVivo at joe_devivo@nps.gov. 2

Inventory and Monitoring Program Background Baseline natural resource data is fundamental to the management of national parks. Natural resource inventories allow us to account for park resources, including the presence, class, distribution, and normal variation of plants and animals, and such important abiotic components as water, soils, landforms, and climate. Inventories contribute to a statement of the condition of park resources in relation to a standard condition, preferably the natural or unimpaired state. Inventories involve the compilation of existing information as well as the collection of new information. During the initial period of the Inventory and Monitoring Program, the National Park Service is collecting information on the diversity of plants and animals in the parks, as well as the distribution of species of special management concern and threatened and endangered species. Maps of selected geophysical features such as soils and geology are being produced. A number of basic water chemistry parameters are being assessed in park wetlands, lakes, and streams. Air quality data also are gathered and evaluated. As a part of the NPS Inventory and Monitoring Program, twelve baseline inventories are to be conducted for each park; one of those baseline inventories is the development of bibliography of existing information, reports, research, and other materials relevant to the management of natural resources on National Parks. Information gathered during this data mining inventory is critical to the development of conceptual models and a consistent framework upon which long-term ecological monitoring plans will be developed. The Southeast Coast Network The Southeast Coast Network (SECN) contains twenty parks, seventeen of which contain significant and diverse natural resources. In total, SECN parks encompass more than 178,000 acres of federally-managed land across North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida. The parks span a wide diversity of cultural missions also, including four National Seashores, two National Historic Sites, two National Memorials, seven National Monuments, two national Military Parks, as well as a National Recreation Area, National Battlefield, and Ecological and Historic Preserve. The parks range in size from slightly more than 20 to nearly 60,000 acres, and when considered with non-federal lands jointly managed with SECN parks the Network encompasses more than 242,000 acres. For information on the Southeast Coast Network of Parks, please see: http://www.nature.nps.gov/im/units/nw14/ To date, a completed Natural Resource Summary Reports have been developed for four parks within the Network (Claxon and Renwick 1987c, b, d, a). Because those reports were written more than 15 years ago, we are looking to update those reports at this time. 3

Table 1 Groups of Parks within the Southeast Coast Network for which Natural Resource Research Summaries will be developed under this request for Pre-Proposals. References for existing research summary reports are given where available. [Park codes in italics are administered by the nearest non-italicized entry above] Park Code Park Available References Group 1 CAHA Cape Hatteras National Seashore (Claxon and Renwick 1987b) FORA WRBR Fort Raleigh National Historic Site Wright Brothers National Memorial CALO Cape Lookout National Seashore (Claxon and Renwick 1987c) Group 2 CANA Canaveral National Seashore (Claxon and Renwick 1987a) CASA FOMA Castillo de San Marcos National Monument Fort Matanzas National Monument Group 3 CHAT Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area HOBE KEMO Horseshoe Bend National Military Park Kennesaw Mountain National Military Park Group 4 FOSU Fort Sumter National Monument CHPI FOPU Charles Pinckney National Historic Site Fort Pulaski National Monument MOCR Moores Creek National Battlefield Group 5 COSW Congaree Swamp National Monument OCMU Ocmulgee National Monument Group 6 CUIS Cumberland Island National Seashore (Claxon and Renwick 1987d) FOFR TIMU FOCA Fort Frederica National Monument Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve Fort Caroline National Memorial Project Objectives 1. Develop a report containing issue-based abstracts that summarize natural history findings, natural resources research, and management issues of importance to each park (or group of parks if jointly managed) to be used as a reference for NPS Natural Resource Managers, and for developing a long-term ecological monitoring program. Topic areas to be included in the report (abstracts and bibliography) will include where appropriate: a. Biological Communities i. Vegetation (species & communities) ii. Mammals iii. Reptiles & Amphibians iv. Birds v. Fish vi. Invertebrates (where appropriate) 4

b. Geology c. Soils vii. Threatened & Endangered Species d. Hydrology (groundwater & surface water) e. Water Quality f. Air Quality g. Ecosystem Studies (i.e., coastal dunes, rivers, wetlands, marine systems, estuaries ) h. Management Issues of Concern i. Exotic Species ii. Off-Road Vehicle Use iii. Adjacent Land Use impacts i. Weather / Climate j. Others as identified on a Park-by-Park basis. 2. Provide a database of scientific literature and topical bibliography for each park in ProCite format. 3. Develop a list of available digital maps, datasets, sources, and metadata, and whether those maps are available publicly or for purchase. For all spatial data, this list should include the following information: date, resolution, format, metadata, and price. 4. Develop a list of 3-5 subject-matter experts for each topic. 5. Acquire and integrate data into NPS data sets (Phase II). Expected Responsibilities of Cooperating Parties 1. NPS contribution to the Project (justification of cooperative agreement): a. Provide substantive input into the development of the study methodology, recognizing that mutual participation is essential to the future success of management recommendations developed pursuant to this research. b. Provide a prioritized list of Management Issues of Concern to the cooperator. c. Assist with data management to facilitate reporting and completion of deliverables. d. Review, in a timely manner, drafts of deliverables at jointly-agreed upon milestones during the period of performance. e. Assist with developing work plan for Phase II of the project in order to prioritize data acquisition and coordinate efforts with other cooperators. 2. Cooperator (to be named) agrees to: a. Accomplish all objectives listed in the statement of work and to provide mutually-agreed upon deliverables following National Park Service specifications. b. Provide drafts of deliverables (abstracts and bibliographies) to NPS for use in developing the Southeast Coast Network long-term monitoring program. c. Enter all bibliographic data into the National Park Service databases provided by the Southeast Coastal Network. 5

d. Others as mutually agreed upon by the Southeast Coast Network and the cooperator. Literature Cited Claxon, P. G., and H. L. Renwick. 1987a. History of scientific research for Canaveral National Seashore. National park Service Cooperative Research Unit. Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Claxon, P. G., and H. L. Renwick. 1987b. History of scientific research for Cape Hatteras National Seashore. National park Service Cooperative Research Unit. Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Claxon, P. G., and H. L. Renwick. 1987c. History of scientific research for Cape Lookout National Seashore. National park Service Cooperative Research Unit. Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Claxon, P. G., and H. L. Renwick. 1987d. History of scientific research for Cumberland Island National Seashore. National park Service Cooperative Research Unit. Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Questions should be directed to Joe DeVivo at: Joe_DeVivo@nps.gov 404-562-3113 x739 6