SUBJECT: Comments on Del Mar Fairgrounds Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report

Similar documents
Nob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project EIR

Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures

City of Del Mar. Del Mar Resort Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report Notice of Preparation

4.1 AESTHETICS EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ALAMITOS BAY MARINA REHABILITATION PROJECT CITY OF LONG BEACH

Tips on Writing to the Planning Commission

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR

4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY

CHAPTER 15 AESTHETICS. Setting. Introduction. Impacts and Mitigation Measures of the 2015 Plan Alternatives

Visual and Aesthetics

3.1 AESTHETICS Background and Methodology

Village Specific Plan Visual Impact Assessment

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: March 17, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 5I

3.2 AESTHETICS/VISUAL QUALITY

CHAPTER 10 AESTHETICS

LETTER OF OBJECTION LAND TO THE SOUTH WEST OF FORGE GARAGE, HIGH STREET, PENSHURST, KENT, TN11 8BU

IV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES

CHAPTER 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR 5.11 PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES

5.11 AESTHETICS ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

Road transport activities and infrastructure can have adverse effects on the environment and community.

Preserving Green Streetscape Character on Hillside Drive

4.1 AESTHETICS/VISUAL RESOURCES

DOCKETED 09-RENEW EO-1

Revised Long Range Transportation Plan

The impacts examined herein take into account two attributes of aesthetic values:

CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMORANDUM Date: May 8, 2018

Chapter 5: Recreation

4/8/2015 Item #10D Page 1

County of San Diego Comprehensive General Plan Update and Draft EIR Response LOG No. 02-ZA-001; SCH NO

3.1 Aesthetics, Light, and Glare

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION

5. Environmental Analysis

Agenda Item 1.a.i. April 4, 2014

Glenn Highway MP DSR. Landscape Narrative

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Request Modification of Conditions (Automobile Service Station) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION II OF TITLE 20--COASTAL ZONING CODE

Section 4.11 Traffic and Transportation 4.11 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

AGENDA SAN DIEGUITO RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL OPEN SPACE PARK CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. 10:30 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. Friday, July 12, 2013

VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Planning Commission Report

Attachment No. 8. SUMMARY OF IVY STATION INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS/MND) COMMENTS RECEIVED AND RESPONSES February 2016

PE1564/G. Petitioner Letter of 4 September th September Dear Mr Sharratt,

5.8 Visual Resources and Aesthetic Qualities

RECIRCULATED NOTICE OF PREPARATION/NOTICE OF PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING

4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES

BUSINESS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY AGENDA REPORT

Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District LAKELAND VILLAGE MDP LINE H, STAGE 1

November 9, Lew Jones, Director of Facilities Berkeley Unified School District 1720 Oregon Street Berkeley, CA 94703

HALF MOON BAY LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM. d), JOHN M. St>NGER ASSOCIATES INC S.F.' CA EIOO VISUAL RESOURCES OVERLAY.

SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY MIMP Condition Status Matrix: July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016

Submitted electronically December 1, 2014

SONOMA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION

6.8 SCENIC HIGHWAYS Introduction

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. VIEWS

Biology and Wildlife. Erosion, Drainage, and Storm water. Chavez Ranch Road Project Comment Response Table - Page 1 January 2017

New Stanton Project Update July 3, 2012

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS

Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW. Title: CA/16/02745/ADV. Author: Planning and Regeneration.

SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN. Planning Commission Study Session August 18, 2016

City Council Goals and Priorities

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT DEEP VALLEY DRIVE AND INDIAN PEAK ROAD MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

PARISH OF ASCENSION OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT. Joint Planning and Zoning Meeting

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR 5.12 VISUAL AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES

2.2.2 Mixed Urban/Community Core Districts

CONCLUSION AND IMPLEMENTATION

4.8 Landform Alteration and Aesthetics

5.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES Physical Setting

CHAPTER 2 - AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES AND AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION AND/OR MITIGATION MEASURES

Commercial Development Standards. City of Homestead

Recommendations Affecting the University Heights Neighborhood that Overlap Both the Uptown and North Park Community Planning Areas

Design Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees*

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS 1. VIEWS

February 6, Re: Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit 5590 E. 7 th Street, Angel Food Donuts Sign. Dear Long Beach Planning Commissioners:

This section describes the existing conditions in the project area and identifies the resources that could be affected by the project.

6.3 VISUAL RESOURCES. Landscape Character

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT-2

SECTION 5.1 Aesthetics, Light, and Glare

Development in the setting of the Cotswolds AONB

Appendix C Agency Correspondence

FREEWAY MAINLINE FAIR SHARE WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR

June 7, Mr. Brian. 150 North. Third Streett. Foote. On behalf. Master Plan Project. Disney Studios. I. Final EXHIBIT Q-1

THE STILLWATER BRIDGE STORY

Request Modification of Proffers Approved by City Council on May 8, 2012 Modification of Conditions (Mini- Warehouse) Staff Recommendation Approval

RIVERSIDE, Newton MA June 9, 2011

5.4.6 Cumulative Operational Impacts

3.6 VISUAL/AESTHETICS

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 8B5

North Carolina Department of Transportation Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch

A revised Planning Justification

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON FIRE CODE

Section4 Design Vision & Implementation Plan

Notice of Completion Form A See NOTE BELOW Mail to: State Clearinghouse, 1400 Tenth Street, Sac., CA / SCH #

Views from the Bridge

Appendix E Section 4(f) Evaluation

Section 3.16 Visual Quality

Transcription:

Dustin Fuller, Sr. Environmental Planner 22 nd District Agricultural Association Del Mar Fairgrounds 2260 Jimmy Durante Boulevard Del Mar, CA 92014-2216 February 5, 2010 SUBJECT: Comments on Del Mar Fairgrounds Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report Dear Mr. Fuller, We are San Diego residents who frequently drive round-trip to Huntington Beach, marveling at the scenic beauty provided by the coastal lagoons and river valleys along the way. The views across the recently restored San Dieguito Lagoon toward the Pacific Ocean are particularly special to us because we have been involved with this preservation effort, and because the effort confirms that communities and residents can work together successfully to protect our natural, scenic resources for future generations. Therefore we are disappointed that the DEIR not only fails to describe the unique character of this scenic vista but also provides inappropriate and therefore false representations of the views from both northbound I-5 and southbound I-5 toward the proposed project. Our concern is that the DEIR is deficient as follows: SECTION 4.5 AESTHETICS On page 4.5-1 under Existing Environmental Setting, the DEIR inexplicably excludes the San Dieguito River Valley from its definition of Existing Visual Resources. This is an egregious omission since the River Valley with views toward the Pacific Ocean is the key open space vista in this area and one of the last remaining in San Diego County. The second paragraph goes on to state Land uses surrounding the project site are primarily commercial and/or residential etc. In fact, the project site is surrounded to the west, the south and partially on the east by the newly restored San Dieguito Lagoon and bordered on all sides by trails provided for walkers, hikers and cyclists and a scenic drive designated for the specific purpose of allowing car passengers to enjoy the unique scenic qualities of the Lagoon and River Valley environment. The importance of preserving the visual resources of this restored natural resource is clearly outlined in the San Dieguito River Park Concept Plan, approved by the City of San Diego in 1994, page 40 under Special Design Considerations for the Del Mar Coastal Lagoon Landscape Unit: Due to the special characteristics within the Del Mar Coastal Lagoon landscape unit, the following site specific design recommendations should be considered when reviewing public and private development proposals within this portion of the (River Park s Focused Planning Area) FPA: The sweeping open space views within this landscape should be protected. Future development should be compatible with the open space character of the lagoon area in term of both visual compatibility and intensity of use. View opportunities of the lagoon and ocean from trails and existing circulation routes should be preserved and, where appropriate, enhanced.

SECTION 4.5.3 REGULATORY SETTING In order to be complete, information about the San Dieguito River Valley must be included in the aforementioned Section 4.5.2 Existing Environmental Setting, and the San Dieguito River Park Concept Plan must be included under Section 4.5.3 Regulatory Setting, beginning on page 4.5-15. These inclusions would certainly impact the conclusions reached in Section 4.5.6 (page 4.5-23) Project Impacts and the Threshold of Significance 4.5.1 on page 1-33: Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista and Threshold 4.5.2 on page 4.5-27 Substantially damage scenic resources within. state scenic highway. WITHOUT THESE INCLUSIONS, THE DEIR IS INCOMPLETE AND IT S CONCLUSION THAT THERE ARE NO AESTHETIC OR VISUAL RESOURCES LOCATED ON SITE OR IN THE SURROUNDING VICINITY THAT HAVE BEEN DESIGNATED AS SCENIC VISTAS IN CITY OR COUJNTY POLICIES OR PLANS AND THAT THE IMPACT OF THE PROJECT IS LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IS UNTRUE. Existing Viewsheds Descriptions: Figure 4.5.4 (DEIRViews 5 and 6) At 4.5-2, the DEIR states views were selected to show the view of traffic toward the project site from the adjacent public roads. (and) photographs were taken to analyze the various views and land uses that would potentially be affected by the proposed project. If these photographs were used to analyze the impact of the proposed project on scenic views, the DEIR is clearly deficient since the views selected were not taken from I-5 toward existing views of the Pacific Ocean and the project site. Inexplicably, photographs are taken from the on-ramp at Via de la Valle (View 5 description) and of trees and tent structures on the Surf and Turf lot (View 6 description). Neither could possibly be considered as views from I-5 looking at the impact of the proposed project on existing coastal vistas. Please find attached, photos taken by Stuart Smith from both the northbound and southbound lanes on I-5 clearly showing the unique views of the San Dieguito Lagoon and Pacific Ocean to the west toward the project site. The photos by Mr. Smith are positioned above the photos provided in the DEIR that claim to show that the project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. In fact, the DEIR View 5 and View 6 photos misrepresent completely the existing visual character of the site and its surroundings and the conclusions drawn are untrue. Further, at 4.5-25 (Threshold 4.5.1 Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista), third paragraph, the DEIR states that although views will be punctuated by the Master Plan projects (the) views from I-5 are fleeting as a result of the vehicle speeds and, while public, views from I-5 are not considered to be view of a scenic vista. This is an untrue statement. The views are of such a marvelous scenic quality that they hold our attention for significant periods of time as we travel round-trip from San Diego to Huntington Beach and obviously provide travelers with unparalleled views of a scenic vista. Figure 4.5.3 (DEIR View 4) Finally, View 4 on page 4.5-11 of the DEIR suggests that there is no view of the Pacific Ocean from Jimmy Durante Boulevard facing west. However the view that is seen by hundreds of visitors to the many events at the Fairgrounds, notably the County Fair, is the view of the River, the horizon and the North Bluffs Preserve from the Jimmy Durante Boulevard BRIDGE looking west. Using a view from further north on Jimmy Durante Boulevard is a grievous omission by the DEIR and ignores the purpose of the document, which is to identify environmental impacts and suggest alternatives

that would reduce the impact. Again we have included a photo taken by Mr. Smith that shows a public view from the bridge on Jimmy Durante Boulevard looking west over the River toward the Ocean and the North Bluffs Preserve that would be impacted by the proposed Fairgrounds project. Again the photo provided in the DEIR (View 4) is a misrepresentation of the existing visual character of the site and its surroundings and its conclusion regarding the impact of the proposed project is false. Finally please find attached a modified DEIR Figure 4.5.1 to show the locations from which Stuart Smith s photos were taken: B (View West from Jimmy Durante Blvd. at the Bridge), N (View from the Northbound I-5 Lane) and S (View from the Southbound I-5 Lane) compared to the DEIR View Vantage Location(s 4,5 and 6) that we have discussed. We ask that the DEIR be revised to include a description of the San Dieguito River Valley as an Existing Visual Resource in Section 4.5, and that the San Dieguito River Valley Concept Plan be included as a Regulatory Agency in Section 4.5.3. We are also asking that the DEIR provide photos of the views from northbound and southbound I-5, and from Jimmy Durante Blvd at the Jimmy Durante Bridge toward the Pacific Ocean that are, as suggested by the photos taken by Mr. Smith, more relevant to the Environmental Review process for determining significant impacts on scenic vistas, scenic resources and the existing visual character of the site and its surroundings. Finally additional photo simulations must be prepared using the corrected views to help reviewers better understand and communicate the potential visual changes associated with the proposed Master Plan projects, and to provide a good representation of the overall project character as visible from a variety of land use areas. (Quotes are from the DEIR description of Photo Simulations on page 4.5-22.) We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the 22 nd District Agricultural Association s proposed project, and hope you will respond to the concerns by revising the sections, photos and simulations we have brought to your attention. Sincerely, Ben Nyce and Ann Gardner 12971 Via Latina Del Mar CA 92014 Photos by: Stuart Smith 615 Rimini Road Del Mar CA 92014