PRINCE. APPROVED Transit District Development Plan. and Transit District Overlay Zoning Map Amendment

Similar documents
Preliminary Port Towns Sector Plan and Proposed Sectional Map Amendment March 2009

Subregion I. Proposed Sectional Map Amendment, August Preliminary Master Plan and

Largo Town Center. Approved Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment. December 2013

Branch Avenue Corridor

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

Resource Conservation Plan

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA TRANSIT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TRANSIT DISTRICT OVERLAY ZONE UPDATE

Seabrook Lanham & VICINITY. March Approved Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment $9.00

ABSTRACT. Approved Sector Plan and Sectional Map Amendment for the Greenbelt Metro Area. The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

master plan of highways bus rapid transit amendment

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on January 14, 2010, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

Comprehensive Blueprint for Our Future. Adopted 4/2/18

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ORDER OF APPROVAL

RECOMMENDED GOALS, CONCEPTS, GUIDELINES PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

FROM METRO STATIONS TO GREAT URBAN PLACES

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL FINAL DECISION APPROVAL OF DETAILED SITE PLAN

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2017 Legislative Session

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL CORRECTED ORDER AFFIRMING PLANNING BOARD DECISION, WITH CONDITIONS

Morgan Boulevard and Largo Town Center Metro Areas

CHAPTER VIII Implementation

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT KILLARNEY/GLENGARRY (WARD 8) NW CORNER OF RICHMOND ROAD AND 33 STREET SW BYLAWS 1P2015 AND 7D2015

Transit / Housing Oriented Redevelopment

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

MOUNT BAKER TOWN CENTER: THE 2014 REZONE AND TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT. By Talis Abolins

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

NEC of Central Avenue and Indian School Road

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 January 25. That Calgary Planning Commission recommend APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

Chapter Master Planned Communities (MPC) District

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

Urban Development Area (UDA) Process in Virginia: History & Requirements

Urban Planning and Land Use

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

Town of Oakville Streetscape Strategy

GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Joint Public Hearing. Preliminary Subregion 5 Master Plan and Proposed Sectional Map Amendment

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

LAND USE ELEMENT. Purpose. General Goals & Policies

S C O P E O F W O R K A P R I L

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES. In This Chapter. Goals & Strategies 182 Project List 183 Future Land Use 186 CHAPTER 11 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Local Growth Planning in North Central Green Line Communities

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Plan Overview. Manhattan Area 2035 Reflections and Progress. Chapter 1: Introduction. Background

UAA School of Engineering Parking Garage Master Plan Amendment. 1. Purpose

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

LAND USE OVERVIEW WHAT YOU WILL FIND IN THIS CHAPTER

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

Joint Meeting City Council and the Plan Commission. September 1st, 2015

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

ANC 2A Presentation. November 9, 2006

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Executive Summary. The Mebane CLP is not a regulatory document, but is intended to guide land development decisions. The plan includes:

Staff Report and Recommendation

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

D-O LRT Zoning Discussion. Chapel Hill Boards & Commissions October 16, 2017

Northwest commuter rail station US 36 BRT. Westminster Station

R E S O L U T I O N. Zones R-20/T-D-O R-20/T-D-O Use Vacant Single-family Attached (Townhouses) Acreage: Townhouse lots - 131

Preliminary Transit District Development Plan and Proposed Transit District Overlay Zoning Map Amendment. March 2009

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

LAND USE AMENDMENT CORNERSTONE (WARD 3) 60 STREET NE AND COUNTRY HILLS BOULEVARD NE MAP 26NE BYLAW 22D2017

Status Report: MD 355 Project

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

CITY OF COLWICH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE LAND USE 1

MEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ORDER AFFIRMING PLANNING BOARD DECISION, WITH AMENDED CONDITIONS

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

Preliminary Recommendations Tk Takoma/Langley Crossroads Sector Plan

Public may provide comments on the GDP within the next two weeks (December 24)

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PLAN CONCEPT... 3

City of Woodinville Planning Commission Study Session. Development Regulations 101: An Overview of Specific Regulatory Items To Help You in 2012

Approved Countywide Master Plan of Transportation. November 2009

West Ocala Vision & Community Plan City Council Work Session. Presented by West Ocala Community Plan Steering Committee

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO ADD A NEW SECTION 4.N. IN THE ZONING CODE FOR THE TOWN OF MIDDLETOWN, RELATING TO MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

Transcription:

PRINCE $25.00 GEORGE S PLAZA APPROVED Transit District Development Plan and Transit District Overlay Zoning Map Amendment July 2016 The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department www.pgplanning.org

Abstract TITLE: AUTHOR: SUBJECT: The Approved Prince George s Plaza Transit District Development Plan and Transit District Overlay Zoning Map Amendment The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission The Approved Transit District Development Plan and Transit District Overlay Zone for the Prince George s Plaza Regional Transit District within Planning Area 68 in Prince George s County, Maryland DATE: July 2016 SOURCE OF COPIES: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive Upper Marlboro, Maryland 20772 SERIES NUMBER: 214152306 NUMBER OF PAGES: 376 ABSTRACT: This document is the Transit District Development Plan (TDDP) and Transit District Overlay Zoning Map Amendment (TDOZMA) for the Prince George s Plaza Regional Transit District. The plan contains a comprehensive vision to guide future development within the area along with implementation strategies to help realize the development vision. The Plan replaces the 1998 Prince George s Plaza Approved Transit District Development Plan for the Transit District Overlay Zone. It also amends portions of the Plan Prince George s 2035 Approved General Plan, the 1983 Adopted and Approved Functional Master Plan for Public School Sites, the 1994 Planning Area 68 Approved Master Plan and Sectional Map Amendment, the 2009 Countywide Master Plan of Transportation, and Formula 2040: Functional Master Plan for Parks, Recreation and Open Space (2014) for the portion of Planning Area 68 within the Prince George s Plaza Regional Transit District and the Prince George s County Zoning Map for that portion of Planning Area 68 within the Regional Transit District. Developed with extensive stakeholder and community input, including a community planning charrette and follow-up community meetings, the TDDP and TDOZ are intended to help create a compact, walkable transit-oriented community around the Prince George s Plaza Metro Station that will promote greater use of public transit, serve as a regional destination and economic engine for the County, and increase local tax revenues.

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA APPROVED Transit District Development Plan and Transit District Overlay Zoning Map Amendment July 2016 The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive Upper Marlboro, MD 20772 www.pgplanning.org

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Elizabeth M. Hewlett, Chairman Casey Anderson, Vice Chairman Officers Patricia Colihan Barney, Executive Director Joseph Zimmerman, Secretary-Treasurer Adrian R. Gardner, General Counsel The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC) is a bicounty agency, created by the General Assembly of Maryland in 1927. The Commission s geographic authority extends to the great majority of Montgomery and Prince George s Counties: the Maryland-Washington Regional District (M-NCPPC planning jurisdiction) comprises 1,001 square miles, while the Metropolitan District (parks) comprises 919 square miles, in the two counties. The Commission has three major functions: The preparation, adoption, and, from time to time, amendment or extension of the General Plan for the physical development of the Maryland-Washington Regional District. The acquisition, development, operation, and maintenance of a public park system. In Prince George s County only, the operation of the entire county public recreation program. The Commission operates in each county through a Planning Board appointed by and responsible to the County government. All local plans, recommendations on zoning amendments, administration of subdivision regulations, and general administration of parks are responsibilities of the Planning Boards. The Prince George s County Planning Department: Our mission is to help preserve, protect and manage the County s resources by providing the highest quality planning services and growth management guidance and by facilitating effective intergovernmental and citizen involvement through education and technical assistance. Our vision is to be a model planning department of responsive and respected staff who provide superior planning and technical services and work cooperatively with decision makers, citizens, and other agencies to continuously improve development quality and the environment and act as a catalyst for positive change. Prince George s County Planning Board Montgomery County Planning Board Elizabeth M. Hewlett, Esq., Chairman Casey Anderson, Chairman Dorothy F. Bailey, Vice Chair Norman Dreyfuss Manuel R. Geraldo Natali Fani-Gonzalez John P. Shoaff Amy Presley A. Shuanise Washington Marye Wells-Harley ii

Prince George s County Rushern L. Baker, III, County Executive County Council The County Council has three main responsibilities in the planning process: (1) setting policy, (2) plan approval, and (3) plan implementation. Applicable policies are incorporated into area plans, functional plans, and the general plan. The Council, after holding a hearing on the plan adopted by the Planning Board, may approve the plan as adopted, approve the plan with amendments based on the public record, or disapprove the plan and return it to the Planning Board for revision. Implementation is primarily through adoption of the annual Capital Improvement Program, the annual Budget, the water and sewer plan, and adoption of zoning map amendments. Council Members Mary A. Lehman, 1st District Deni Taveras, 2nd District Dannielle Glaros, 3rd District, Council Vice Chairman Todd M. Turner, 4th District Andrea C. Harrison, 5th District Derrick L. Davis, 6th District, Council Chair Karen R. Toles, 7th District Obie Patterson, 8th District Mel R. Franklin, 9th District Clerk of the Council Redis C. Floyd iii

Table of Contents 1. Blueprint for Tomorrow... 1 Introduction...3 Plan Themes...8 Plan Organization...9 Plan Vision: Imagine...10 2. Defining the Context... 13 National Urbanization Trends: Implications for the Future of Prince George s County...14 Responding to Change: Plan Prince George s 2035...17 Community Engagement...18 The Transit District Today: Regional Setting and Existing Conditions...24 Planning Context...26 Area Demographic and Economic Profile...27 Context and Existing Conditions...30 Challenges, Assets, and Opportunities...64 3. Plan Elements... 67 Growth Policy...68 Land Use...70 Economic Prosperity...77 Transportation and Mobility...79 Natural Environment...98 Housing and Neighborhoods...100 Community Heritage, Culture, and Design...102 Healthy Communities...110 Public Facilities...112 Parks and Recreation...114 4. Implementation...119 Implementation Plan and Priority Strategies...120 5. Transit District Overlay Zoning Map Amendment...145 Comprehensive Rezoning Policies...146 Public Rezoning Requests...149 Comprehensive Rezoning Changes...150 6. Transit District Overlay Zone and Transit District Standards...187 Transit District Overlay Zone...188 General Applicability and Administration...189 Exemptions...198 Transit District Standards...201 Key Definitions...203 Streets and Frontage...207 iv

Bulk and Height...235 Site Elements...244 Architectural Elements...249 Parking and Loading...258 Transportation Adequacy...263 Downtown Core Standards...265 Neighborhood Edge Standards...270 7. Transit District Use Tables...275 8. Appendices...349 Acknowledgments...363 List of Maps Map 1. Transit District in Context... 2 Map 2. Prince George s Plaza Transit District... 3 Map 3. Growth Policy Map... 4 Map 4. Strategic Investment Map... 5 Map 5. Existing Land Use... 31 Map 6. Existing Streets... 38 Map 7. Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities... 41 Map 8. Existing Bus and Shuttle Service... 43 Map 9. Existing Parking Facilities... 45 Map 10. Green Infrastructure Network... 48 Map 11. Watershed... 49 Map 12. 1989 County Floodplain Study... 51 Map 13. Amendment to the Prince George s Plaza Regional Transit District... 69 Map 14. Character Areas... 71 Map 15: Future Land Use... 74 Map 16. Existing and Proposed Master Planned Street and Road Facilities... 83 Map 17. Recommended Street Connections... 85 Map 18. Recommended Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities... 91 Map 19. Suggested Termini, Visually Interesting Features, and Special Corner Locations...107 Map 20. Recommended Park and Recreation Facilities...115 Map 21. Existing Zoning...151 Map 22. Proposed Zoning...152 Map 23. Zoning Change 1: Superimpose the T-D-O Zone...167 Map 24. Zoning Change 2 and 3: R30C to R-18, and Zoning Change 4: R-18 to R-10...169 Map 25. Zoning Change 5: R-10 to R-20...171 Map 26. Zoning Change 6: M-X-T to M-U-I...173 v

List of Maps (continued) Map 27. Zoning Change 7: C-S-C, C-O, and R-18 to M-U-I...177 Map 28. Zoning Change 8: M-X-T to M-U-I...179 Map 29. Zoning Change 9: C-S-C and M-X-T to M-U-I...181 Map 30. Zoning Change 10: C-S-C to O-S and Zoning Change 11: C-S-C to M-U-I...183 Map 31. Zoning Change 12: R-18 to R-20...185 Map 32. Character Area Map...202 Map 33. Existing A and B Streets...204 Map 34. Maximum Building Heights...237 Map 35. Existing Parking Facilities...262 Map 36. Intersection Level of Service (2014)...352 Map 37. Future Intersection Level of Service (2035)...353 Map 38. Annual Average Daily Traffic (2014)...354 List of Tables Table 1. Demographic Snapshot... 28 Table 2. Recent Development in the Downtown Core... 32 Table 3. Recent Development in the Neighborhood Edge... 33 Table 4. Prince George s Plaza Transit District Market Absorption... 35 Table 5. Parking Inventory... 44 Table 6. Existing Multifamily Developments... 53 Table 7. Public Schools Serving the Transit District... 59 Table 8. School Facility Conditions: 2012 Parsons 3DI Study... 60 Table 9. School Enrollment and Capacity... 61 Table 10. Pupil Yield Rates (2014)... 61 Table 11. 2035 Projected School Enrollment and Buildout Capacity (Total)... 62 Table 12. Properties Amended into the Prince George s Plaza Regional Transit District... 68 Table 13. Anticipated 2035 Buildout (Net New Development)... 73 Table 14. Existing and Proposed Master Planned Street and Road Facilities... 84 Table 15. Recommended On-Street Bicycle Accommodations... 87 Table 16. Recommended Off-Street Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities... 89 Table 17. Recommended Park and Recreation Facilities...116 Table 18. Proposed Legislative Actions...123 Table 19. Action Items: Land Use...129 Table 20. Action Items: Economic Prosperity...130 Table 21. Action Items: Transportation and Mobility...131 Table 22. Action Items: Natural Environment...138 Table 23. Action Items: Housing and Neighborhoods...139 Table 24. Action Items: Community Heritage, Culture, and Design...140 Table 25. Action Items: Public Facilities...142 Table 26. Action Items: Parks and Recreation...143 vi

List of Tables (continued) Table 27. Comprehensive Rezoning Changes...150 Table 28. Zoning Inventory (in Acres)...150 Table 29. Zoning Change 1: Superimpose the T-D-O Zone...153 Table 30. Zoning Change 2: R30C to R-18...168 Table 31. Zoning Change 3: R30C to R-18...168 Table 32. Zoning Change 4: R-18 to R-10...168 Table 33. Zoning Change 5: R-10 to R-20...170 Table 34. Zoning Change 6: M-X-T to M-U-I...172 Table 35. Zoning Change 7: C-S-C, C-O, and R-18 to M-U-I...174 Table 36. Zoning Change 8: M-X-T to M-U-I...178 Table 37. Zoning Change 9: C-S-C and M-X-T to M-U-I...180 Table 38. Zoning Change 10: C-S-C to O-S...182 Table 39. Zoning Change 11: C-S-C to M-U-I...182 Table 40. Zoning Change 12: R-18 to R-20...184 Table 41. Landscape...194 Table 42. Downtown Core (DC) and Neighborhood Edge (NE) Frontage/Build-To Zone Standards: Existing Public Streets...211 Table 43. Downtown Core (DC) and Neighborhood Edge (NE) Frontage/Build-To Zone Standards: New Streets...212 Table 44. Downtown Core (DC) and Neighborhood Edge (NE) Street Design Standards: New Streets...213 Table 45. Construction Bonuses...243 Table 46. Land Bonuses...243 Table 47. Table of Permitted Uses: Transit District Overlay/Mixed-Use Infill (T-D-O/M-U-I) Zone...277 Table 48. Table of Permitted Uses: Transit District Overlay/Mixed-Use Transportation-Oriented (T-D-O/M-X-T) Zone...295 Table 49. Table of Permitted Uses: Multifamily Residential Zones...302 Table 50. Table of Permitted Uses: Open Space and Single-Family Residential Zones...322 vii

List of Figures Figure 1. 2035 Illustrative Vision... 11 Figure 2. Post-2035 Illustrative Concept Plan... 12 Figure 3. Prince George s Plaza Transit District Development Activity Timeline, 1950-2015... 32 Figure 4. Proposed Toledo Road Extension Illustrative Street Section... 82 Figure 5. Proposed MD 410 (East West Highway) Road Diet Concept... 86 Figure 6. Belcrest Road (Toledo Terrace to Metro Entrance) Off-Street Cycle Track Illustrative... 90 Figure 6. Downtown Core Frontage Zones...206 Figure 7. Neighborhood Edge Frontage Zones...206 Figure 8. MD 410 (East West Highway) Illustrative Street Section...214 Figure 9. Belcrest Road (Toledo Terrace To Metro Entrance) Illustrative Street Section...215 Figure 10. Toledo Terrace Illustrative Street Section...216 Figure 11. Toledo Road (Existing) Illustrative Street Section...217 Figure 12. Toledo Road (Extended) Illustrative Street Section...218 Figure 13. New Downtown Core A Street Illustrative Street Section...219 Figure 14. Downtown Core A Street Frontage Standards (Excluding Belcrest Road)...220 Figure 15. New Downtown Core B Street Illustrative Street Section...221 Figure 16. Downtown Core B Street Frontage Standards...222 Figure 17. New Downtown Core Pedestrian Street Illustrative Street Section...223 Figure 18. Pedestrian Street Frontage Standards...224 Figure 19. New Downtown Core Promenade Illustrative Street Section...225 Figure 20. Existing Northwest Drive, Dean Drive, New Neighborhood Edge A Street Illustrative Street Section...227 Figure 21. Northwest Drive, Dean Drive, Adelphi Road and New Neighborhood Edge A Streets Frontage Standards...228 Figure 22. New Neighborhood Edge B Street Illustrative Street Section...229 Figure 23. Neighborhood Edge B Streets Frontage Standards...230 Figure 24. New Alley Section Illustrative Street Section...231 Figure 25. Downtown Core: One-Story Commercial-Institutional Standards...268 Figure 26. Downtown Core Multistory: Commercial, Residential, Institutional Standards...269 Figure 27. Downtown Core: Townhomes and Two-Family Attached Standards...269 Figure 28. Neighborhood Edge: Multifamily Standards...272 Figure 29. Neighborhood Edge: Townhomes and Two-Family Attached Standards...272 Figure 30. Neighborhood Edge: Single-Family Detached Residential...272 Figure 31. Plan 2035: Regional Transit Districts...357 Figure 32: Plan 2035 Generalized Future Land Use Categories...358 viii

Foreword The Prince George s County Planning Board is pleased to announce that the Prince George s County Council, sitting as the District Council, approved the Prince George s Plaza Transit District Development Plan (TDDP) and Transit District Overlay Zoning Map Amendment (TDOZMA) on July 19, 2016. This collaborative, communitybased plan provides a clear vision for the future of the Prince George s Plaza Regional Transit District, which contains the Prince George s Plaza Metro Station. This TDDP and TDOZMA replaces the 1998 Prince George s Plaza Approved Transit District Development Plan for the Transit District Overlay Zone and, pursuant to Section 27-548.04(b) of the Prince George s County Zoning Ordinance, is the applicable area master plan for the Prince George s Plaza Regional Transit District. It amends portions of the Plan Prince George s 2035 Approved General Plan (Plan 2035), the 1983 Adopted and Approved Functional Master Plan for Public School Sites, the 1994 Planning Area 68 Approved Master Plan and Sectional Map Amendment, the 2009 Countywide Master Plan of Transportation, and Formula 2040: Functional Master Plan for Parks, Recreation and Open Space (2014) for the portion of Planning Area 68 within the Prince George s Plaza Regional Transit District. Plan 2035 designates the Prince George s Plaza Metro Station as a Regional Transit District and as one of three Downtowns, or priority investment centers, for Prince George s County. The TDDP envisions a medium- to high-density mix of complementary uses incorporating a variety of retail offerings, connected public spaces, and a range of transportation and housing options. Community participation and input began in February 2014, culminating in a three-day community planning charrette plus follow-up report-out and open houses in fall 2014 and spring 2015. Additional community and stakeholder input was solicited through a series of small stakeholder group and property owner meetings, email, and web-based solicitations, agency worksessions, surveys, municipal briefings, and information gathering sessions. Continued coordination and active participation is the cornerstone for successful implementation of the plan. This plan establishes the vision for the area and contains Prince George s County s policies for land use, economic prosperity, transportation and mobility, the natural environment, housing and neighborhoods, community heritage, culture, and design, healthy communities, public facilities, parks and recreation, and implementation within the Prince George s Plaza Regional Transit District. It also includes design guidelines and zoning regulations, and permitted uses for future development to facilitate implementation of the plan vision. The TDOZMA reclassifies properties into appropriate zoning categories for the creation of the envisioned regional transit district. I applaud the contributions and active involvement of the community and stakeholders in this comprehensive planning effort. We look forward to your further participation in the implementation of this plan. Sincerely, Elizabeth M. Hewlett, Chairman ix

x