DCBP Appendix FINAL US Army Garrison, Hawaii October 2015 DCBP APPENDIX B Action Plan for Retrofitting Structural BMPs Storm Water Management Plan DCBP Appendix B
ACTION PLAN FOR RETROFITTING STRUCTURAL BMPs US ARMY GARRISON, HAWAII SEPTEMBER 2014
Action Plan for US Army Garrison, Hawaii Retrofitting Structural BMPs September 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page REQUIREMENT...1 SELECTION OF RETROFIT SITES...1 SUMMARY OF RETROFIT PROJECTS...2 FUTURE RETROFIT PROJECTS...6 ATTACHMENT 1: PROPOSED RETROFIT SITE SUMMARIES... A 1 LIST OF TABLES Number Title Page Table 1 Project Description, Drainage Area, Impervious Area, and Size of LID/BMP Site 3 Table 2 Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects for Various Criteria (Sorted High to Low) 5 Table 3 Estimated Construction Cost, Design Cost, Annual Maintenance Costs for 6 LID Retrofit Projects, and five year implementation schedule
Action Plan for US Army Garrison, Hawaii Retrofitting Structural BMPs September 2014 REQUIREMENT In accordance with the US Army Garrison, Hawaii (USAG HI) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit Number HI S000090 effective April 7, 2014, Part D.1.f.(1)(iv), USAG HI is required to developed the following Action Plan for Retrofitting Structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) within their existing MS4. The MS4 Permit requirements are as follows: Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping D.1.f.(1)(iv) Action Plan for Retrofitting Structural BMPs Provide the DOH with an Action Plan for Retrofitting Structural BMPs within one (1) year of the effective date of this permit, which shall identify retrofits to be implemented, explanation on the basis of their selection and an implementation schedule. The implementation schedule shall cover a five (5) year period and be updated yearly to include additional retrofit projects with water quality protection measures. The annual updates to the implementation schedule shall be included in the Annual Report with a description of the projects status. The Action Plan may include, but not be limited to projects in compliance with any TMDL implementation and monitoring plan. SELECTION OF RETROFIT SITES The purpose of the Action Plan for Retrofitting Structural BMPs is to reduce storm water pollution by designing and constructing/installing appropriate and cost effective BMPs (retrofits) in strategic locations and structures within USAG HI s existing MS4. Potential retrofit sites were selected through a comprehensive study performed by the US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research and Development Center (USACE ERDC). The objective of this study was to identify and rank potential Low Impact Development (LID) projects with the focus at Schofield Barracks and Wheeler Army Airfield. The following tasks were completed to analyze the most appropriate LID projects: 1) Identified potential LID project locations through analysis of available data, such as satellite imagery, drainage maps, and digital elevations maps. 2) Developed a list of preliminary projects. 3) Conducted a series of field visits on USAG HI facilities to evaluate, photograph, and document potential LID projects. 4) Checked potential LID project sites against the latest (2011) Master Development Plan (MDP) obtained from the USAG HI Directorate of Public Work Master Planning Division (DPW MPD). 5) Refined preliminary list of projects based on field visits, including elimination of projects due to issues arising in field checking or conflicts with the MDP, consolidation of some small projects, and the dividing of some large projects. 6) Prepared a table with information on each remaining potential project, including: project description, drainage area divided into three land use areas impervious, disturbed, and natural surface, BMP types and area. 7) Prepared spreadsheets for each potential project to calculate runoff, sediment (total suspended solids (TSS), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) loads from the sites. 8) Calculated the reductions in flow as well as the reductions in TSS, TN, and TP as a result of the BMPs employed in each project. 9) Prepared an aerial view figure of each potential LID project location, along with a photograph of the location and a summary of load reductions and calculations for each site. Page 1 of 6
Action Plan for US Army Garrison, Hawaii Retrofitting Structural BMPs September 2014 10) Prepared a summary and cost analysis of the LID projects. 11) Ranked each project for hydrologic, water quality, aesthetic, and recreation benefits, as well as construction cost, maintenance costs, and constructability. 12) Final selection of five year implementation projects determined by current and projected funding availability. SUMMARY OF RETROFIT PROJECTS A total of 12 individual LID projects were selected for consideration. Projects for consideration were focus at Schofield Barracks because it houses majority of the industrial facilities within USAG HI s existing MS4. Application of LID retrofits would maximize our benefits at this location. These projects were selected based on the opportunity to potentially provide hydrology and water quality, as well as educational, aesthetic, and recreational benefits. We quantitatively analyzed the potential of these projects to provide for hydrologic and water quality benefits. We also calculated the construction and maintenance costs for each potential project. We used this quantitative information along with qualitative information to rank each of the projects. Final selection of five year implementation projects determined by current and projected funding availability Table 1 provides a summary of proposed retrofit projects, drainage areas, impervious areas, and size of LID/BMP site. Table 2 provides the rankings of these proposed retrofit projects based on criteria mentioned in the previous paragraph. Table 3 provides estimated construction cost, design cost, annual maintenance costs, and proposed five year implementation schedule. The implementation year is the year in which the proposed retrofit is scheduled to be completed; however, this schedule is subject to change due to funding availability, permitting delays, or other unforeseen circumstances. Changes to the implementation schedule will be provided in the Annual Report. Page 2 of 6
Action Plan for US Army Garrison, Hawaii Retrofitting Structural BMPs September 2014 Table 1. Project Description, Drainage Area, Impervious Area, and Size of LID/BMP Site Retrofit Number Location BMPs Impervious Surface (m 2 ) Natural Ground (including disturbed land) (m 2 ) Impervious Surface (%) Total Area (m 2 ) LID Site Size (m 2 ) Disturbed Land (m 2 ) Natural Land (m 2 ) S 1 The drainage and grass covered area located in Lyman Gate Bioretention, Sand Trench, vegetated swale, & Pocket Wetland 101,363 49,275 67% 150,638 5,283 3,980 45,296 S 3A A ditch along Lyman Road Geotextile 500,489 102,510 83% 602,999 5,075 12,111 0 S 3B A ditch along Lyman Road Geotextile 464,584 95,156 83% 559,739 1,870 5,098 0 S 3C A ditch along Lyman Road Geotextile 42,617 6,971 86% 49,589 3,102 6,971 0 S 3D S 6 S 7 S 12 S 13 S 14 Ditch on Lyman Rd The eroded channel along Humphries Road A vegetated swale along Trimble Road The eroded culvert along McMahon Road The parking lot along North side of the Menoher Road A badly eroded culvert on the intersection area between McMAHON Rd and Capron Avenue Bioretention, Vegetated Swale, & Gravel Trench 917 175 84% 1,092 197 175 0 Vegetated Swale 43,186 95,219 31% 138,405 1,069 35,070 60,149 Vegetated Swale 45,188 10,717 81% 55,905 2,867 4,505 6,212 Vegetated Swale 29,177 41,154 41% 70,331 1,359 0 41,154 Bioretention, & Gravel Trench 25,404 14,922 63% 40,327 2,457 0 14,922 Vegetated Swale 77,266 2,590 97% 79,856 1,849 4,826 1,849 Page 3 of 6
Action Plan for US Army Garrison, Hawaii Retrofitting Structural BMPs September 2014 Table 1. Project Description, Drainage Area, Impervious Area, and Size of LID/BMP Site (continued) Retrofit Number Location BMPs Impervious Surface (m 2 ) Natural Ground (including disturbed land) (m 2 ) Impervious Surface (%) Total Area (m 2 ) LID Site Size (m 2 ) Disturbed Land (m 2 ) Natural Land (m 2 ) S 21 S 22 The parking lot of Bldg 580 (25 Infantry Division Headquarters) Solomon Elementary School parking lot Bioretention, & Gravel Trench 8,242 3,025 73% 11,268 219 0 3,025 Bioretention, & Gravel Trench 3,680 3,128 54% 6,808 542 87 3,041 Page 4 of 6
Action Plan for US Army Garrison, Hawaii Retrofitting Structural BMPs September 2014 Table 2. Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects for Various Criteria (Sorted High to Low) Retrofit No. Hydrology Water Quality Construction Cost Constructability Long term Operations & Maintenance Cost Educational Aesthetic Recreation (active and/or passive) Total S1 4 4 6 5 4 5 5 5 38 S7 3 4 10 5 5 1 4 1 33 S3C 3 3 10 5 5 1 4 1 32 S14 2.5 3 10 5 5 1 4 1 31.5 S6 2 3 10 5 5 1 4 1 31 S3A 2.5 3 9 5 4 1 4 1 29.5 S12 2.5 3 10 4 4 1 4 1 29.5 S22 4 3.5 6 3 1 5 4 3 29.5 S3B 2 3 8 5 3 1 4 1 27 S3D 3.5 3 6 5 3 1 3 1 25.5 S21 3.5 3.5 3 2 1 5 4 3 25 S13 4.5 4 2 3 4 3 3 1 24.5 Page 5 of 6
Action Plan for US Army Garrison, Hawaii Retrofitting Structural BMPs September 2014 Table 3. Estimated Construction Cost, Design Cost, Annual Maintenance Costs for LID Retrofit Projects, and five year implementation schedule Retrofit No. Construction Cost Cost are Listed in $1,000 of dollars Engineer Design Cost Total Cost Annual Maintenance Cost Implementation Year S1 80 25 105 2 2019 S3A 11 4 15 1 2016 S3B 12 4 16 1 2016 S3C 2 1 3 0.1 2016 S3D 16 5 21 0.1 2017 S6 1 0.4 2 0.1 2015 S7 1 0.3 1 0.1 2015 S12 4 1 6 1 2017 S13 531 170 701 1 2018 S14 2 1 2 0.1 2017 S21 100 32 132 3 2018 S22 45 14 59 3 2019 A detailed description of each retrofit site, including a vicinity map and a summary of the basis for their selection, is provided in Attachment 1. FUTURE RETROFIT PROJECTS As required by Part D.1.f.(1)(iv) of the MS4 Permit, this Action Plan for Retrofitting Structural BMPs will be updated annually to identify additional retrofit projects. Future retrofits will be selected through the review and evaluation of sites identified as potential projects in previous studies and from the review of data collected during ongoing inspections of the MS4. REFERENCES 1. US Army Garrison, Hawaii Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit Number HI S000090, effective April 7, 2014. 2. Stormwater Management LID Retrofit Analysis for US Army Garrison, Hawaii (USAG HI) NPDES Permit, US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research Development Center (USACE ERDC), dated May 24, 2011. Page 6 of 6
Action Plan for US Army Garrison, Hawaii Retrofitting Structural BMPs September 2014 ATTACHMENT 1 PROPOSED RETROFIT SITE SUMMARIES
W1 W5 W6 W4 W3 W2 --------- 1 cm = 183 m Figure 1. Location of LID Retrofit Projects on Wheeler Army Airfield
S15 S16 S23 S24 S14 S12 S13 S8 S9 S10 S11 S11A S22 S7 S19 S21 S18 S17 S17 S6 S17 S4 S3C S3B S3D S17 S3A S5 S17 S2 S1 S20 Figure 2. Location of LID Retrofit Projects on Schofield Barracks --------- 1 cm = 430 m
S1 S1 An undeveloped area near Lyman gate will be used to capture and treat runoff from a large drainage area. The project will consist of bioretention with subsurface gravel/sand trench, pocket wetlands, and a vegetated swale. In addition to treating large amounts of runoff the project will eliminate erosion along a drainage ditch/swale currently circumventing the project area. Retrofit Description/ Location S1 Drainage and grass covered area located in Lyman Gate BMP Bioretention, Sand Trench, vegetated swale, & Pocket Wetland Drainage Area Total Cost $105,000 Flow Reduction (m 3 ) 3,675 TSS Reduction (kg) 398 TP Reduction (kg) 1.1 TN Reduction Rd (kg) 95 9.5 Stream Erosion Reduction/Yr (kg) 4,701 BMPs Area (m 2 ) 5,283 Bioretention (m 2 ) 2,089 Pocket Wetland d( (m 2 ) 1,528 Vegetated Swale (m 2 ) 1,666 Drainage Area (m 2 ) 150,638 Flow BMP Area --------- 1 cm = 70 m
S1, (con t) Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects Long-term Operations & Maintenance Cost Recreation (active and/or passive) Retrofit No. Hydrology Water Quality Construction Cost Constructability Educational Aesthetic Total S1 4 4 6 5 4 5 5 5 38
S3A S3 Ditches along Lyman Road are a major drainage feature at SB. Many of the ditches are eroded, some severely. Due to the varying sizes of the ditches, discharge, and degree of erosion, we propose four separate projects: o S3A Geotextile or other channel stabilizing technology. o S3B Geotextile or other channel stabilizing technology. o S3C Geotextile or other channel stabilizing technology. o S3D Vegetated swale and bioretention with gravel trench. Retrofit Description/ Location S3A Ditches along Lyman Road BMP Geotextile Total Cost $15,000 Flow Reduction (m 3 ) 1,203 TSS Reduction Rd (kg) 1,301 TP Reduction (kg) 1.0 TN Reduction (kg) 7.1 Stream Erosion Reduction/Yr (kg) 57,440 BMPs Area (m 2 ) 5,075 Geotextile (m 2 ) 5,075 Drainage Area (m 2 ) 602,999 BMP Area Drainage Area Flow --------- 1 cm = 153 m
S3A, (con t) Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects Long-term Operations & Maintenance Cost Recreation (active and/or passive) Retrofit No. Hydrology Water Quality Construction Cost Constructability Educational Aesthetic Total S3A 2.5 3 9 5 4 1 4 1 29.5
S3B Retrofit Description/ Location S3B Ditches along Lyman Road BMP Geotextile Total Cost $16,000 Flow Reduction (m 3 ) 443 TSS Reduction (kg) 1,116 TP Reduction (kg) 0.8 TN Reduction (kg) 5.3 Stream Erosion Reduction/Yr (kg) 51,285 BMPs Area (m 2 ) 1,870 Geotextile (m 2 ) 1,870 Drainage Area (m 2 ) 559,739 Drainage Area BMP Area Flow --------- 1 cm = 129 m
S3B, (con t) Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects Long-term Operations & Maintenance Cost Recreation (active and/or passive) Retrofit No. Hydrology Water Quality Construction Cost Constructability Educational Aesthetic Total S3B 2 3 8 5 3 1 4 1 27
S3C Retrofit Description/ Location BMP S3C Ditches along Lyman Road Geotextile Total Cost $3,000 Flow Reduction (m 3 ) 736 TSS Reduction (kg) 189 TP Rd Reduction (kg) 03 0.3 TN Reduction (kg) 1.9 Stream Erosion Reduction/Yr (kg) 24,617 BMPs Area (m 2 ) 3,102 Geotextile (m 2 ) 3,102 Drainage Area (m 2 ) 49,589 Drainage Area Flow BMP Area --------- 1 cm = 42 m
S3C, (con t) Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects Long-term Operations & Maintenance Cost Recreation (active and/or passive) Retrofit No. Hydrology Water Quality Construction Cost Constructability Educational Aesthetic Total S3C 3 3 10 5 5 1 4 1 32
S3D Drainage Area Retrofit S3D Description/ Location BMP Small ditch along Lyman Road Bioretention, i Vegetated Swale, & Gravel Trench Total Cost $21,478 Flow Reduction (m 3 ) 46 TSS Reduction (kg) 5 TP Rd Reduction (kg) 00 0.0 TN Reduction (kg) 0.1 Stream Erosion Reduction/Yr (kg) 3,693 BMPs Area (m 2 ) 197 Bioretention (m 2 ) 79 Vegetated Swale (m 2 ) 119 Drainage Area (m 2 ) 1,092 Flow --------- 1 cm = 7 m BMP Area
S3D, (con t) Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects Long-term Operations & Maintenance Cost Recreation (active and/or passive) Retrofit No. Hydrology Water Quality Construction Cost Constructability Educational Aesthetic Total S3D 3.5 3 6 5 3 1 3 1 25.5
S6 S6 The eroded channel along HumphriesRoad will be retrofitted with a vegetated swale. Retrofit Description/ Location S6 Eroded channel along Humphries Road BMP Vegetated swale Total Cost $2,000 Flow Reduction (m 3 ) 253 TSS Reduction (kg) 384 TP Reduction (kg) 0.3 TN Reduction (kg) 1.5 Stream Erosion Reduction/Yr (kg) 3,077 BMPs Area (m 2 ) 1,069 Vegetated Swale (m 2 ) 1,069 Drainage Area (m 2 ) 138,405 Drainage Area Flow Flow BMP Area --------- 1 cm = 205 m
S6, (con t) Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects Long-term Operations & Maintenance Cost Recreation (active and/or passive) Retrofit No. Hydrology Water Quality Construction Cost Constructability Educational Aesthetic Total S6 2 3 10 5 5 1 4 1 31
S7 S7 An eroding vegetated swale will be reworked to increase conveyance, reduce erosion, and increase infiltration. Retrofit Description/ Location S7 Vegetated swale along Trimble Road BMP vegetated swale Total Cost $1,000 Flow Reduction (m 3 ) 680 TSS Reduction (kg) 174 TP Reduction (kg) 0.2 TN Reduction (kg) 1.7 Stream Erosion Reduction/Yr (kg) 11,471 BMPs Area (m 2 ) 2,867 Vegetated Swale (m 2 ) 2,867 Drainage Area (m 2 ) 55,905 Drainage Area Flow BMP Area --------- 1 cm = 35 m
S7, (con t) Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects Long-term Operations & Maintenance Cost Recreation (active and/or passive) Retrofit No. Hydrology Water Quality Construction Cost Constructability Educational Aesthetic Total S7 3 4 10 5 5 1 4 1 33
S12 S12 Channel erosion near a culvert along McMahon Road will be reduced by retrofitting the channel with a vegetated swale. Retrofit S12 Description/ Location Eroded culvert along Mcmahoh Road BMP Vegetated Swale Total Cost $6,000 Flow Reduction (m 3 ) 322 TSS Reduction (kg) 94 TP Reduction (kg) 0.1 TN Reduction (kg) 0.9 Stream Erosion Reduction/Yr (kg) 14,180 BMPs Area (m 2 ) 1,359 Vegetated Swale (m 2 ) 1,359 Drainage Area (m 2 ) 70,331 Drainage Area Flow BMP Area Flow --------- 1 cm = 60 m
S12, (con t) Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects Long-term Operations & Maintenance Cost Recreation (active and/or passive) Retrofit No. Hydrology Water Quality Construction Cost Constructability Educational Aesthetic Total S12 2.5 3 10 4 4 1 4 1 29.5
S13 S13 The parking along North side of the Menoher Road will be retrofitted with bioretention and gravel trench using open areas between the parking lot and the road. Flow into the bioretention areas will be accomplished by removing the curb in the parking lot adjacent to the BMPs. Retrofit Description/ Location S13 Parking lot along north side of the Menoher Road Drainage Area BMP Bioretention, & Gravel Trench Total Cost $701,000 Flow Reduction (m 3 ) 1,104 TSS Reduction (kg) 91 TP Reduction (kg) 0.3 TN Reduction (kg) 2.3 Flow BMP Area 2 BMPs Area (m 2 ) 2,457 Bioretention (m2) 2,457 Drainage Area (m 2 ) 40,327 --------- 1 cm = 47 m
S13, (con t) Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects Long-term Operations & Maintenance Cost Recreation (active and/or passive) Retrofit No. Hydrology Water Quality Construction Cost Constructability Educational Aesthetic Total S13 4.5 4 2 3 4 3 3 1 24.5
S14 S14 A badly eroded channel will be retrofitted with geotextile to eliminate erosion. Retrofit Description/ Location S14 Badly eroded culvert BMP Geotextile Total Cost $2,000 Flow Reduction (m 3 ) 438 TSS Reduction (kg) 238 TP Reduction (kg) 0.2 TN Reduction (kg) 1.6 Stream Erosion Reduction/Yr (kg) 11,488 BMPs Area (m 2 ) 1,849 Geotextile (m 2 ) 1,849 Drainage Area (m 2 ) 79,856 Flow BMP Area Drainage Area --------- 1 cm = 65 m
S14, (con t) Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects Recreation Retrofit No. Hydrology Water Quality Construction Cost Constructability Long-term Operations & Maintenance Cost Educational Aesthetic (active and/or passive) Total S14 2.5 3 10 5 5 1 4 1 31.5
S21 S21 The parking lot of Bldg 580 (25 th Infantry Division Headquarters) will be retrofitted with bioretenion with gravel trench. The BMP will be located in the SE corner of the parking lot, in a paved area currently not used for parking. This retrofit will require removing this pavement. The retrofit will also encompass a small landscaped area between the paved lot and the building. A walkway through the bioretention area will permit access to the building. This retrofit has very high educational benefit. Retrofit Description/ Location S21 Bldg 580 parking lot BMP Bioretention, & Gravel Trench BMP Area Total Cost $132,000 Flow Reduction (m 3 ) 301 TSS Reduction (kg) 29 TP Reduction (kg) 0.1 TN Reduction (kg) 0.7 BMPs Area (m 2 ) 219 Bioretention (m 2 ) 219 Drainage Area (m 2 ) 11,268 Drainage Area Flow --------- 1 cm = 22 m
S21, (con t) Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects Long-term Operations & Maintenance Cost Recreation (active and/or passive) Retrofit No. Hydrology Water Quality Construction Cost Constructability Educational Aesthetic Total S21 3.5 3.5 3 2 1 5 4 3 25
S22 S22 Landscape areas near the Solomon Elementary School parking lot will be retrofitted with bioretention with gravel trench to reduce and treat runoff from the parking lot. This retrofit has very high educational opportunity. Retrofit Description/ Location S22 Solomon Elementary School parking lot BMP Bioretention, i & Gravel Trench Total Cost $59,000 Flow Reduction (m 3 ) 171 TSS Reduction (kg) 14 TP Rd Reduction (kg) 00 0.0 Drainage Area TN Reduction (kg) 0.3 BMPs Area (m 2 ) 542 Bioretention (m 2 ) 542 Drainage Area (m 2 ) 6,808 Flow BMP Area --------- 1 cm = 15 m
S22, (con t) Ranking of LID Retrofit Projects Long-term Operations & Maintenance Cost Recreation (active and/or passive) Retrofit No. Hydrology Water Quality Construction Cost Constructability Educational Aesthetic Total S22 4 3.5 6 3 1 5 4 3 29.5