HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. 37 Church Street East. Prepared By:

Similar documents
HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. 62 Union Street. Prepared By:

L 2-1 HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. Cheyne Family Cemetery. Main Street South

L 4-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Kodors House. 35 Rosedale Avenue West

HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION

L 1-1. Reason. ns for Heritage Designa

L 3-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Peter Archdekin Farmhouse Mayfield Road

L 3-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Wiley Bridge Gorewood Drive, Claireville Conservation Area

Authority: North York Community Council Item 31.7, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No.

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE ON TUESDAY MARCH 29, 2016

57: 2031 North Service Road West, Hilton Farm

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE34.30, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO

Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan

Heritage Designation Brief. Bonner Worth Mill: Administration Building

Morgan s Subdivision Historic District Character-defining Features

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

This property contributes to the historic streetscape of Colborne Street and its striking architecture makes it a landmark along the street.

Ordnance Street 110 Plan OS Lot 413 B202; parts of Lot 412 and portion of Lot 413

buildings sites structures objects 0 Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register : 0

2154 Dundas Street West Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

HERITAGE REPORT REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION

2: Bond Street, I.O.F Orphanage

Memo. B R A Y H e r i t a g e

REPORT FOR ACTION SUMMARY

L 9-1. ons for Heritage Designatiion. brook Farrm Clarkway Drive

West Virginia Historic Preservation Office

STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF RATHBURN ROAD, FROM DUKE OF YORK BOULEVARD TO SHIPP DRIVE, CITY OF MISSISSAUGA. Submitted to:

Planning Justification Brief

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Study Public Consultation March 26, 2013

Architectural Inventory Form (page 1 of 5)

Ottawa Historic Resources Inventory: Commercial Historic District Building Information. Significance and Potential Eligibility

THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LOCAL LANDMARK NOMINATION INSTRUCTIONS

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East

Historic Resources Inventory Evaluation Form

CITY OF MIAMI CEMETERY 1800 N.E. 2 AVENUE

Authorization to Study Potential Heritage Conservation Districts (HCD) under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act

KING-SPADINA COMMERCIAL HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN COMMUNITY CONSULTATION MEETING #1

Policy Discussion Paper CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES

Baker Historic District

52: 2182 Lakeshore Road East, Horizons

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08) 1 IDENTIFICATION

HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY - BUILDING AND STRUCTURES. Please send completed form to: National Register and State Register Coordinator,

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement Queen's Park

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

1. Description of Property

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

Gateway Corridor Standards

HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08) 1 IDENTIFICATION

Baby Point Heritage Conservation District Study. Kick-off Community Meeting March 27, 2017 Humbercrest United Church

TOWN OF AURORA ARCHITECTURAL SALVAGE PROGRAM GUIDE

1. Description of Property

Eastern Golf Course, Doncaster Road, Doncaster

Architectural Inventory Form

Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment Review Update of the Mayfield West Phase II Secondary Plan TOWN OF CALEDON, ONTARIO.

Meeting Agenda. Business Items

ADDENDUMS CRAFTSMAN The Craftsman style of Architecture was influenced by the English Arts and Crafts movement and East Asia, particularly Japan. In t

Architectural Inventory Form

Long Branch Neighbourhood Character Guidelines Final Report

43: 2165 Dundas St. West, Smith-Carrique Barn and Shed

Commercial Building Cuba Street. Images: Charles Collins, Summary of heritage significance

RE: Report CDS (Municipal Heritage Committee Minutes May 8, 2018) Randwood Estate

Recommended Heritage Designation

Sainte-Catherine Street West

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08) 1 IDENTIFICATION

I 1-1 HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. OSTRANDER FARM 2378 EMBLETON ROAD Lots 5 and 6, Concession 5 WHS CITY OF BRAMPTON, ONTARIO.

50: 1475 Lakeshore Road East, Ryrie Estate

6: 2417 Fourth Line, Sixteen Hollow, Lion Valley Park

Broadview Avenue Properties Inclusion on Heritage Inventory

Purchase Proposal Call for the Former St. Louis School 75 Allen Street East Addendum #3 12-June-2013

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

TAKE NOTICE that the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kingston intends to pass a by-law

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

Part 3 TYPE: BUNGALOW. 1910s 1930s

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

9: 204 & 240 Front Street, George Street Parkette & Dingle Park. 1. Description of Property. Name (if applicable) Legal Description

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE-HISTORY INVENTORY FORM

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08) 1 IDENTIFICATION

Report to Rapport au: Built Heritage Sub-Committee / Sous-comité du patrimoine bâti December 10, 2015 / 10 décembre and / et

7.0 NATIONAL WINE CENTRE

Address: 302 West Main Street PIN: Plan: Rectangular Stories: 2 Original Owner: Roof Type: Flat

Gillingham Hall Norfolk

Architectural Inventory Form

Eastlake/Stick - Common character defining features

Heritage Designation Brief

APPENDIX F CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Architectural Inventory Form

HISTORIC SITE FORM - HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (10-08) 1 IDENTIFICATION

58: 1285 Sedgewick Crescent, Rotary Gardens

King-Spadina HCD Study

CELEBRATING DESIGN EXCELLENCE

10 Park Lawn Rd - Zoning Amendment Application- Preliminary Report

CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT TERMS OF REFERENCE

CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE WHITEBELT VISIONING EXERCISE ADDENDUM TO THE GTA WEST LAND USE STUDY WORK PROGRAM

Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

Heritage Oshawa Meeting

Urban Design Brief Woodland Cemetery Funeral Home 493 Springbank Drive

Transcription:

L 1-1 1 Brampton Heritage Board Date: February 15, 2011 HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION 37 Church Street East Prepared By: Prepared by: Antonietta Minichillo, Heritage Coordinator Planning, Design & Development Urban Design Section Corporation of the City of Brampton, City Hall 2 Wellington Street West Brampton, Ontario L6Y 4R2

L 1-2 2 PROFILE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: ROLL NUMBER 10-01-0-003-09300-0000 PIN NUMBER 141240054 MUNICIPAL ADDRESS 37 Church Street East WARD NUMBER 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLAN BR 13 PT BLK L SECONDARY PLAN PROPERTY NAME The Jennings House CURRENT OWNER Paul Kiss CRITERIA GRADE A CURRENT ZONING OWNER CONCURRENCE? Yes / No CURRENT USES AND FUNCTIONS PREVIOUS OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS CONSTRUCTION OR CREATION DATE RESOURCES ON SUBJECT PROPERTY INCLUDED IN DESIGNATION (circle) RELEVANT COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS Residential The Jennings Family c. 1880 Building Cemetery-Burial site Structure-object Historic site Cultural heritage landscape Council Resolution HB054-2005: that the development of a proactive strategy to ensure heritage designation of all Category A heritage resources be endorsed.

L 1-3 3 1.0 REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION: The property at 37 Church Street East is worthy of designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value or interest. The property meets the criteria for designation prescribed by Province of Ontario (Ontario Heritage Act, Regulation 9/06) under the three categories of design or physical value, historical value and contextual value. 1.1 STATEMENT EXPLAINING THE CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST OF THE PROPERTY The cultural heritage value of 37 Church Street East is related to its design or physical value as a residential structure from the 1860-1880 building boom. It is a unique example of Italianate architecture, reflecting a high degree of craftsmanship. Italianate architecture became popular in the mid-nineteenth century. It combined elements of Tuscan architecture and traditional classical methods. The style often incorporated decorated paired eave brackets, tall and narrow windows, paired windows, moulded window surrounds, quoins, wide overhanging eaves, and belvederes. In terms of form, houses were usually symmetrical, aside from the door which was positioned to one side. Italianate architecture also incorporated various decorative details that enhanced the exterior of the houses. The property also has historical or associative value as it reflects the work of Richard Jennings, a famous resident of Brampton. Richard Jennings was born in England in 1845, and immigrated to the United States in 1871. He moved to Canada in 1876 and settled in Brampton. His wife was Elizabeth Pratley. In 1878, Jennings opened a market garden business on the Etobicoke Creek flats near the southeast corner of Church Street East and Union Street. Within a few years, he specialized in flower culture, erecting greenhouses and producing award-winning chrysanthemums, carnations, violets, and other flower varieties. The Jennings residence, located on the southeast corner of Union Street (BR-13, Part Block L), is believed to have been built in the early 1880s. The Collector s Rolls (1887) note Richard Jennings as the owner of 5 1 /2 acres of Block L valued at $2000.00. The Census Return (1891) notes florist Richard Jennings, wife Elizabeth and eight children as the residents of a brick house. The Assessment Roll (1893) notes Richard Jennings, florist, and Harry B. Jennings, florist, on Block L, Church Street. The Census Return (1901) notes Richard and Elizabeth Jennings and four daughters as the occupants of a seven room brick house located on 8 acres of land in part Lot 6 and 7, Church Street, Block L. As well as the house, there were 19 outbuildings (greenhouses) on the property. Originally, the Jennings house overlooked Jennings greenhouses. Jennings set aside and then maintained about 6 acres of his property for an athletic field, which became the nucleus of Rosalea Park in 1894. Richard Jennings died in 1922, and his wife Elizabeth in 1930. The family of Bert Jennings sold the greenhouse property to Mr. and Mrs. Russell who operated the Russell Conservatories. The Russells sold the land to Decar Developments in 1961, and shortly after, the Parkside Apartments were built to the southeast on the greenhouse site.

L 1-4 4 Jennings was known as one of the province s most prominent horticulturists in the early 1900s. He received the Timothy Eaton Chrysanthemum Trophy permanently in 1905 from the Ontario Horticulture and Honey Exhibition for winning the award three years in a row. Along with other Bramptonians such as Harry Dale, T. W. Duggan, William Fendley, Walter E. Calvert and others, Richard Jennings helped establish Brampton s reputation as The Flower Town of Canada in the early 1900s. Richard Jennings also established Rosalea Park, which was considered one of the most beautiful athletic parks in Ontario. Due to his contributions to the history and physical landscape of Brampton, Jennings can be considered an important early figure in the city s development. The cultural heritage value of the property is also connected to its contextual value as it maintains, supports, and defines the character of Church Street East. The property once overlooked a row of greenhouses, where an apartment building now resides. Therefore, the house is a link to Brampton s prosperous horticultural past. The statement explaining the cultural heritage value or interest of the property, including a description of the heritage attributes of the property along with all other components of the Heritage Report: Statement of Reasons for Heritage Designation, constitute the "reason for heritage designation" required under the Ontario Heritage Act. 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES OF THE PROPERTY: Unless otherwise indicated, the reason for designation apply generally to all exterior elevations, facades, foundation, roof and roof trim, all doors, windows, other structural openings and associated trim, all architectural detailing, construction materials of wood, stone, brick, plaster parging, metal and glazing and related building techniques, fencing, all trees, shrubs, hedgerows, other vegetation and the grounds and vistas generally. To ensure that the cultural heritage value of this property is conserved, certain heritage attributes that contribute to its value have been identified specifically and they include: Design / Physical Value: Appears to be in good condition with only minor repairs needed Archival photographs indicate that the house has been minimally altered since it was been built A unique example of an Italianate style house Front façade has a regal pediment, enhanced by dentils, arched window trim and a significant porch Brackets under cornice of bay window Roof has a truncated hip shape Segmented window with radiating voussoirs Decorative brickwork Open side verandah

L 1-5 5 Historical / Associative Value: Built by Richard Jennings, a prominent figure in Brampton s past Jennings established several greenhouses in Brampton, thereby contributing to its reputation as The Flower City Associated with the housing boom of 1860-1880 Contextual Value: The house is associated with Brampton s reputation as the Flower City 2.0 GENERAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The subject property is within the Peel Plain physiographic region of Southern Ontario (Chapman and Putnam, 1984: 174-176). The land surface of the plain is generally characterized by relatively level topography, within a consistent, gradual slope toward Lake Ontario. The property is situated in the former Toronto Township, surveyed in 1880. Valley land, designated as open space, is situated just to the north-east of the subject property. The lot is rectangular shaped. The house covers 7650 square feet. The plan of the principle structure is a simple rectangular-shape. The principle elevation (main façade) is emphasized by the following elements: Patterned, high-quality brickwork Truncated hip-shaped roof Decorative dentils and brackets Enclosed verandah Landscaping elements include: House is surrounded by bushes and tall trees Adjacent property features include: Corner lot of Church Street St. Andrews Church located across the street, to the North Apartment buildings located to the East 3.0 HERITAGE EVALUATION / CRITERIA NOTE: The subject property meets the criteria for designation prescribed by the Province of Ontario under the Ontario Heritage Act, Regulation 9/06.

L 1-6 6 The property was listed in the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources in the 1980s. It was rated a Category A. 4.0 POLICY FRAMEWORK In the context of land use planning, the Province of Ontario has declared that the wise use and management of Ontario s cultural heritage resources is a key provincial interest. A set of Provincial Policy Statements (PPS) provides planning policy direction on matters of provincial interest in Ontario. These statements set the policy framework for regulating the development and use of land. The current set of policies was last reviewed in 2005. At that time the cultural heritage policies were strengthened considerably. The relevant heritage policy statement is PPS 2.6.1, which states that: significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. PPS 2.6.1 is tied to Section 3 of the Ontario Planning Act which stipulates that land use planning decisions by municipalities shall be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statements. The policy is also integrated with the Ontario Heritage Act. This piece of legislation grants municipalities powers to preserve locally significant cultural heritage resources through heritage designation. Decisions as to whether a property should be designated heritage or not is based solely on its inherent cultural heritage value or interest. City Council prefers to designate heritage properties with the support of property owners. However, Council will designate a property proactively, without the concurrence of a property owner as required. These principles are reflected in Brampton s Official Plan. The relevant policies are as follows: 4.9.1.3: All significant heritage resources shall be designated as being of cultural heritage value or interest in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act to help ensure effective protection and their continuing maintenance, conservation and restoration. 4.9.1.5: Priority will be given to designating all heritage cemeteries and all Class A heritage resources in the Cultural Heritage Resources Register under the Ontario Heritage Act. 4.9.1.6: The City will give immediate consideration to the designation of any heritage resource under the Ontario Heritage Act if that resource is threatened with demolition, significant alterations or other potentially adverse impacts. These principles are also guided by recognized best practices in the field of heritage conservation in Ontario and in Brampton s Heritage Program.

L 1-7 7 Council Resolution HB054-2005: The following recommendation from the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of April 19, 2005 was approved by Planning, Design and Development Committee on May 2, 2005 and by Council on May 9, 2005: that the development of a proactive strategy to ensure heritage designation of all Category A heritage resources be endorsed. 5.0 ALTERATION HISTORYAND HERITAGE INTEGRITY NOTE: 5.1 Recommended Restoration Measures: There are no recommendations for future restoration and conservation at this time. 6.0 RARITY NOTE: None 7.0 NOTE ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL: An archaeological assessment was conducted in the area from Church Street East to Nelson Street East by Archworks Inc. No archaeological remains were encountered and the study area was considered clear of further concern. 8.0 EXCLUSIONS: The reasons for designation apply generally to all exterior elevations, facades, foundation, roof and roof trim, all entrances, windows, structural openings and associated trim, all architectural detailing, construction materials of wood, stone, brick, plaster parging, metal and glazing, their related building techniques, all interior spaces detailing and finishes, along with all contextual and landscaping features as cited. There are no exclusions to the scope of designation. 9.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Assessment Rolls, Brampton, North Ward, 1893. Campbell, Jacy. Jennings Was Prominent Name, The Daily Times (Brampton), 1 May 1973, p.5 Census Return, Brampton, 1891 [A-2, p. 14; and 1901 [Div. 2, p. 8]. Charters, C.V., et. al, Brampton s 100th Anniversary as an Incorporated Town, 1873-1973. Brampton: Town of Brampton, 1973. Chinguacousy Township Cemetery No. 16, Brampton Cemetery, Brampton, Ont. Halton-Peel Ontario Genealogical Society, 1973, rev. 1981.

L 1-8 8 The Conservator Anniversary Number, The Conservator (Brampton), 19 August 1915, p. 32. Collector s Rolls, Brampton, North Ward, 1887. Quinton, Cathy. Building Images: An Architectural Review of Brampton Past. Brampton: Brampton Heritage Board, 1983.

L 1-9 9 10.0 LOCATION MAPS: 37 Church Street East 37 Church Street East

L 1-10 10 37 Church Street East Figure 1: Aerial photograph of central Brampton (1947) 37 Church Street East Figure 2: Township Plan (Source: Historical Atlas of Peel County: 1877)

L 1-11 11 11.0 IMAGES: Figure 3: Archival image of the interior of R. Jennings Conservatory Figure 4: Archival image of R. Jennings Conservatories

L 1-12 Figure 5: Archival image of the Jennings Residence (greenhouses visible to the left) Figure 6: Sketch of the Jennings House, illustrated by C. Erny (Source: Quiton, 1983) 12

L 1-13 Figure 7: View from Church Street East Figure 8: Front façade 13

L 1-14 14 Figure 9: Bay window with decorative brackets and radiating voussoirs Figure 10: Regal pediment

L 1-15 15 Figure 11: Open side verandah Figure 12: Decorative dentils

L 1-16 16 Figure 13: Arched window trim Figure 16: Truncated hip-shaped roof

L 1-17 17 Figure 17: House surrounded by bushes and tall trees