Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment

Similar documents
CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT TERMS OF REFERENCE

Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

Cultural Heritage Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

Long Branch Neighbourhood Character Guidelines Final Report

DESIGN REVIEW PANEL TERMS OF REFERENCE AND PROTOCOL

City of Kingston Heritage Commemoration Program Guidelines: 7 May 2010

280 Manse Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

Planning and Building Department APPLICATION FOR CEMETERY EXPANSION BAYVIEW CEMETERY, 720, 726 AND 740 SPRING GARDENS ROAD

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

DESIGN REVIEW PANEL PROCEDURES AND PROTOCOL

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

Heritage Permit Application for 255 Mill Street (Town File #D )

MONITORING STRATEGY. CRM Lab Archaeological Services

Queen Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

523, 525 and 525A Adelaide Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

TOWN OF AURORA ARCHITECTURAL SALVAGE PROGRAM GUIDE

The Manager of Urban Design and Cultural Heritage recommends:

150 Eighth Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

8 Oak Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Focused Area - Official Plan Amendment Status Report

APPENDIX M. Correspondence with the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. Continued

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Planning and Growth Management Committee. Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division. Pg12013 (File No NNY 34 OZ)

Cultural Heritage Impact Statement SoBa Catherine Street, Ottawa

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

646 Kingston Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

C-I-10. The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: B. Reduce the cluttered aspects of current development by:

P art B 10 HERITAGE VALUES. Community Enablement and Physical Resources ISSUE

Planning Primer Legislative Background, Policy Documents and Development Review Processes. Presented by: Planning Services Date: April 6, 2017

Cultural Heritage Resources

112 College Street Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

PDS June 1, 2016 Page 1. Planning and Development Committee. MEETING DATE: Wednesday, June 01, 2016

Highway Oriented Commercial Development Criteria

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR Office of the City Solicitor Planning Department

Municipal Heritage Awards Program

Adversely impact the cultural heritage value of properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA).

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

Yonge Street Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Elfrida Growth Area Study

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

1296 Kennedy Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Wellington Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Planning Justification Brief

Purpose of Report...1. Planning Framework Provincial Policy Statement Draft PPS...2. Ontario Heritage Act...3

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

49 to 51 Camden St - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

BUD Brampton Urban Design Awards CELEBRATING DESIGN EXCELLENCE

9.1 ISSUES OBJECTIVES RULES - Class B - Heritage Items RULES - Class C - Heritage Items RULES - Old Town Overlay Area 18

10 Park Lawn Rd - Zoning Amendment Application- Preliminary Report

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

Summary of Heritage Input

Historic Yonge Street HCD Plan Community Consultation October 14, 2015

DRAFT Regional Implementation Guideline. Conserving Regionally Significant Cultural Heritage Resources

CELEBRATING DESIGN EXCELLENCE

and Richmond Street West - Official Plan Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

WQW Study Community Meeting June 26, 2017

Bloor St. W. Rezoning - Preliminary Report

Urban Design Review Panel Terms of Reference

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement Queen's Park

CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS

Public Storage Self-storage Facility (Warehouse)

141 GEORGE STREET PLANNING RATIONALE

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

11 Charlotte Street - Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Applications- Request for Direction Report

Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Variance from Chapter 297, Signs, of the Former City of Toronto Municipal Code Bloor Street West (High Park)

North York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, North York District. Ward No. 26, Don Valley West

Memo. B R A Y H e r i t a g e

6 PORT SYDNEY SETTLEMENT AREA

2450 Victoria Park Avenue Official Plan Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Memorials, Plaques & Interpretive Signs Policy

TOURIST AREA DESIGN GUIDELINES

Cultural Heritage Landscapes Strategy

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Study Public Consultation March 26, 2013

KING-SPADINA COMMERCIAL HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN COMMUNITY CONSULTATION MEETING #1

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BYLAW NO A bylaw to adopt Amendment No. 6 to the Official Plan for The Regional Municipality of York

3 TOWN OF WHITCHURCH-STOUFFVILLE OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NOS. 116 & 117

I539. Smales 2 Precinct

Study Process / Planning Policy Issues

Figure 1- Site Plan Concept

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

333 College Street and 303 Augusta Avenue - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

11 and 33 Centre Avenue and 80 Chestnut Street Zoning Amendment Final Report

QUEEN-RIVER SECONDARY PLAN

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS

Yonge-Summerhill: Urban Square Design (Midtown)

and services The protection and conservation of environmentally significant and sensitive natural heritage features and functions.

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

Transcription:

Revised: March 2012 Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville 1. Purpose of a Heritage conservation involves identifying, protecting and promoting buildings, structures or other elements that have been deemed to have local, Provincial or National significance. A (CHIA) is the Study that assesses, reviews and confirms the potential heritage significance of the resource; considers the impact of any proposed site development or alteration on the identified resource; and recommends an overall approach that best conserves the cultural heritage resource. The CHIA forms an integral part of the Municipal planning and building framework. Its rationale emerges from a range of Provincial and Municipal policies, namely: Provincial Policy Statement, 2005 Section 2.6.3 Ontario Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990 Part 1, 2(d) Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O., 1990 Part IV, Sections 29 and 34 Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Official Plan Section 6.4 Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Built Heritage Inventory 2. Town Objectives Arising from the Town Council, in consultation with the Whitchurch-Stouffville Heritage Advisory Committee, review all CHIA documents. It is the objective of the Town to identify, protect, and where possible, enhance the built heritage and other related heritage resources of the Municipality. It is the stated preference of the Town that the built heritage and other resources be incorporated into the emerging development fabric (if a plan of subdivision, site plan or similar matter) or as an integral component of site development (either as a stand-alone structure or as part of a larger building addition).

If as a result of the CHAI the Owner can demonstrate to the satisfaction of Town Council that the building or heritage resource cannot be incorporated into the development or redevelopment proposal, then the next step would be to list the building for sale by the Owner. The sale of the building would allow for the structure to be moved to another location on the development property, or, off-site to another property. The objective of the sale of the building to a third party would be to preserve the structure and ensure that it is restored. The final option is that if the Owner can demonstrate to the satisfaction of Council through the CHAI that the building is in a state of disrepair, or, has been significantly altered such that the architectural value of the building has been diminished, and as such it is beyond the ability to renovate, then Council may agree to the issuance of a Demolition Permit under the authority of the Ontario Building Code. As a companion component of the Demolotion permit, Council typically requires the ability of the Whitchurch-Stouffville Heritage Advisory Committee be able to enter onto the property and premise to catalogue/photograph the building. The Owner, if a Demolition Permit is issued, will be requested to preserve as many of the key architectural elements of the building as practically feasible with the objective to make them available to purchasers for inclusion in other restoration/renovation projects. 3. When is a Required? A CHIA shall be completed by the Owner when the property is included on the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Built Heritage Inventory, and, one or more of the following applications is submitted to the Municipality: Demolition Permit; Official Plan and/or Zoning By-law Amendment; Plan of Subdivision or Condominium; Site Plan Control; Consent; Minor Variance 4. Who Can Prepare a? All CHAIs shall be prepared by a qualified heritage professional such as a heritage planner or heritage architect with demonstrated knowledge of accepted heritage conservation standards, and who has undertaken historical research and identification/ evaluation of cultural heritage value. 2 P age

Where potential archeological resources have been identified, under Provincial Law only a licensed professional archeologist may carry out an Archeological Assessment using specific Provincial standards and guidelines. 5. What Elements should be contained in the Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment Study The CHIA will include, but is not limited to the following information: A. Introduction to the Development Site A Location Plan indicating the subject property; A concise written and visual description of the property identifying significant features, buildings, landscape and vistas; A concise written and visual description of the cultural heritage resource(s) contained within the development site identifying significant features, buildings, landscape, vistas and any heritage recognition of the property; A concise written and visual description of the surrounding context of adjacent properties, their landscapes and any potential undesignated or designated cultural heritage resource(s); and, Present Owner contact information B. Background Research and Analysis Comprehensive written and visual research and analysis related to all potential cultural heritage value or interest of the site (both identified and unidentified) including: physical or design, historical or associative, and contextual values; A development history of the site including original construction, additions and alterations with substantiated dates of construction; and Research material to include relevant historic maps and atlases, drawings, photographs, sketches/renderings, permit records, land records, assessment rolls, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville directories, etc. C. Statement of Significance 3 P age A statement of significance identifying the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the cultural heritage resource(s). This statement will

be informed by current research and analysis of the site as well as preexisting heritage descriptions. This statement is to follow the Provincial guidelines set out in the Ontario Heritage Took Kit; The statement of significance will be written in a way that does not respond to or anticipate any current or proposed interventions. The Town may, at its discretion and upon review, reject or use the statement of significance, in whole or in part, in crafting its own statement of significance (Reasons for Listing or Designation) for the subject property; and Professional quality record photographs of the cultural heritage resource in its present state. D. Assessment of the Existing Condition A comprehensive written description accompanied with high quality colour photographic documentation of the cultural heritage resource(s) in its current condition and physical context (location, streetscape, etc.) E. Description of the Proposed Development or Site Alteration A written and visual description of the proposed development or site alteration. F. Impact of Development or Site Alteration An assessment identifying any impact(s) the proposed development or site alteration may have on the cultural heritage resource(s). Impacts on a cultural heritage resource(s) as stated in the Ontario Heritage Took Kit and Burra Charter include, but are not limited to: o Removal of any, or part of any, significant heritage attributes or features; o Alteration that impact on the historic fabric and appearance; o Shadow impacts that alter the appearance and/or setting of a heritage attribute, or change the viability of an associated natural feature or plantings, such as a garden; o Isolation of a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context or a significant relationship; 4 P age

o Direct or indirect obstruction of significant views or vistas within, from, or of built and natural features; o A change in land use (such as rezoning a church to a multi-unit residence) where the change in use negates the property s cultural heritage value; o Land disturbances such as a change in grade that alters soils, and drainage patterns that adversely affect a cultural heritage resource, including archaeological resources; and o Relocation (to be considered under the conditions described in Article 9 of the Burra Charter). G. Considered Alternatives and Mitigation Strategies An assessment or alternative options, mitigation measures, and conservation methods that may be considered in order to avoid or limit the negative impact on the cultural heritage resource(s). Methods of minimizing or avoiding a negative impact on a cultural heritage resources(s) as stated in the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit include, but are not limited to: o Alternative development and approaches; o Isolating development and site alteration from significant built and natural features and vistas; o Design guidelines that harmonize mass, setback, setting, and materials; o Limiting height and density; o Allowing only compatible infill and additions; o Reversible alterations; and o Relocation (to be considered under the conditions describe in Article 9 of the Burra Charter). H. Conservation Strategy The preferred strategy based on best-practice conservation principles that protect and enhance the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the cultural heritage resource(s) including, but not limited to: 5 P age o A mitigation strategy including the proposed methods; o A conservation scope of work including the proposed methods;

o An implementation and monitoring plan; o Recommendations for additional studies/plans related to, but not limited to: conservation, interpretation and/or commemoration. If removal of the Cultural Heritage Resource was recommended, the CHIA must provide site-specific design guidelines to address: lighting, signage, landscaping, site stabilization/sedimentation, and photographic documentation prior to demolition. Referenced conservation principles and precedents 6. How Many Copies of a CHIA are to be provided to the Town of Whitchurch- Stouffville? Please provide the following to the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Planning & Building Services Department: Five (5) bound hard copies; One (1) CD copy in PDF format Contact Information Isa James, MCIP, RPP Planner, Urban Design Planning & Building Services Department Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Telephone: 905-640-1910 ext. 2314 Fax: 905-640-7957 isa.james@townofws.ca 6 P age