BOND STRENGTH BEHAVIOR OF HEADED REINFORCEMENT BAR WITH VARYING EMBEDMENT LENGTH

Similar documents
Strength of bonded anchors in concrete in direct tension

Analysis of Pullout Resistance of Soil-Nailing in Lateritic Soil

R-LX-CS-ZP Zinc Plated Countersunk Concrete Screw Anchor

European Technical Approval ETA-08/0035 This ETA replaces ETA-08/0035 with validity from till

Transition of soil strength during suction pile retrieval

Experimental tests for geosynthetics anchorage trenches

R-KEX II with Rebars as an Anchor

R-LX-HF-ZF Zinc flake coated Hex with Flange Concrete Screw Anchor. Applications

Load-Carrying Capacity of Stone Column Encased with Geotextile. Anil Kumar Sahu 1 and Ishan Shankar 2

[Gupta* et al., 5(7): July, 2016] ISSN: IC Value: 3.00 Impact Factor: 4.116

GEOMEMBRANE FIELD INSTALLATION

Experimental Study on Utilization of E -Waste in Cement Concrete

EFFECT OF BOLT CONNECTION OF SQUARE-SHAPED GEOCELL MODEL ON PULLOUT TEST RESULTS

Reinforced FBG Sensors Serve Demanding Applications

Structural shaping of some early concrete structures in Wroclaw

PULLOUT CAPACITY OF HORIZONTAL AND INCLINED PLATE ANCHORS IN CLAYEY SOILS

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

Design Optimization of Evaporator Clip by FEA (ANSYS)

A REVIEW ON HEAT EXCHANGER

European Technical Assessment. ETA-11/0288 of 10 September English translation prepared by DIBt - Original version in German language

Comprehensive Material Characterizations for a Pavement Embankment Installed with Wicking Fabric

SOIL STABILIZATION USING NATURAL FIBER COIR

Effect of harvesting time and moisture on mechanical properties of garlic (Allium sativum L.) skin

Mechanical Behavior of Soil Geotextile Composites: Effect of Soil Type

SUBGRADE IMPROVEMENT OF CLAYEY SOIL WITH THE USE OF GEOTEXTILES

Overall Stability Moving from Service to Strength Limit State: Why? Nick Harman, MS, PE Ani Carignan, PE, LEED AP STGEC Conference October, 2018

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

Technical Supplement 14D. Geosynthetics in Stream Restoration. (210 VI NEH, August 2007)

Cabinet Type Washing and Drying Machine

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-issn: Volume: 04 Issue: 05 May p-issn:

Behaviour of a Strip Footing on Compacted Pond Ash Reinforced with Coir Geotextiles

Experimental Comparison of Natural Convection Heat Transfer from a Blackened V-Fin Array

THE PERFORMANCE OF STRENGTHENING SLOPE USING SHOTCRETE AND ANCHOR BY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD (FEM)

European Technical Assessment. ETA-14/0323 of 10 October General Part. Technical Assessment Body issuing the European Technical Assessment:

Performance Analysis Of Double Inclination Ribbed Solar Air Heater Rectangular Duct By Liquid Crystal Thermography

WASATCH HOLLOW PRESERVE PHASE II RIPARIAN RESTORATION JOB NO

SECTION DUCTWORK. A. Section Painting: Weld priming, weather resistant, paint or coating.

DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF OMNI MULTI AXIS CEILING FAN

RESPONSE OF ANCHOR IN TWO-PHASE MATERIAL UNDER UPLIFT

D-11 OUTLINE SPECIFICATION FOR HTHW (ABOVE GRADE) HYDRONIC PIPING

Fiber Optic Patch Cord and Pigtails

SOLAR TUBE COLLECTORS

--> Buy True-PDF --> Auto-delivered in 0~10 minutes. YD/T Translated English of Chinese Standard: YD/T

PULLOUT RESISTANCE FACTORS FOR INEXTENSIBLE MSE REINFORCEMENTS EMBEDDED IN SANDY BACKFILL. November 16, 2012

Effect of Moisture Content on the Tensile Strength of Jute Geotextile

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 8, August ISSN

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PULL-OUT CAPACITY OF HELICAL PILE IN CLAYEY SOIL

COMPARISON OF SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS OF BLACK COTTON SOIL WITH EFFECT OF RELATIVE COMPACTION

Analysis of Triangle Heating Technique using High Frequency Induction Heating in Forming Process of Steel Plate

Remote Monitoring of Offshore Structures using Acoustic Emission.

Effect of pile sleeve opening and length below seabed on the bearing capacity of offshore jacket mudmats

EVALUATION OF ANCHOR SYSTEMS THROUGH FULL SCALE PULLOUT TESTING

R-XPT-HD Hot Dip Galvanized Throughbolt

Soil Stabilization by Using Fly Ash

EFFECT OF CENTRAL PILE IN INCREASING THE BEARING CAPACITY OF BORED PILE GROUPS

TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD PAGE

European Technical Assessment. ETA-16/0958 of 11 April English translation prepared by DIBt - Original version in German language.

Tunnel Fire Dynamics and Evacuation Simulations

S&T HEAT EXCHANGERS Part II: Main Parts, Conical Transitions, Shell & Heads, Nozzle Design.

Behaviour of Black Cotton Soil Reinforced with Sisal Fibre

Integrated Process Solutions. Series 48 Heaters. heater jackets sizes 1 1/2'' to 4'' (nw 40 to nw 100)

DNVGL-CP-0402 Edition February 2016

Thirty-Year Durability of a 20-Mil PVC Geomembrane. E. J. NEWMAN and T. D. STARK*

NF MARK THERMOPLASTIC MATERIAL DRAIN OR SEWER SYSTEM OPERATING WITHOUT PRESSURE

Title Page. Report Title: Downhole Power Generation and Wireless Communications. for Intelligent Completions Applications

EFFECT OF NATURAL GEOTEXTILE ON UNPAVED AND PAVED ROAD MODELS- A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Effect of Combining Silicate and Silane Type Surface Penetrants on Restraint to Deterioration in Concrete

IRISH STANDARDS BASED ON CEN STANDARDS PUBLISHED ON

PART I - MODELING DRYING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL PULP MOLDED STRUCTURES - EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM

An investigation on the mechanical properties of concrete containing North-Sulawesi s coir fibre

KEE & SEE URAS VIBRATORS

PVC aquaculture liners stand the test of time

Analysis of Surface resistivity behavior of Conductive Woven fabrics made from Copper Jari & S.S./Polyester yarns for ESD control

Standard Specification for Hardened Steel Washers [Metric] 1

PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT OF REFRIGERATED AIR DRYER CANOPY BASE

TOWN OF SPENCER FIRE and EMERGENCY SERVICES

Full Scale Model Test of Soil Reinforcement on Soft Soil Deposition with Inclined Timber Pile

A Study on Anti-Loosening Characteristics of Different 3/8 BSW Threaded Fasteners

COST REDUCTION OF SECTION CHANNEL BY VALUE ENGINEERING

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Analysis of Embankments with Different Fill Materials using Plaxis-2D

Test Report No. AJFS FF Date: OCT.17, 2018 Page 1 of 6

Geotextile Testing Equipment

10/18/2010. Today s presentation will focus on what the construction engineer can do to help deliver a successful bridge project

Miniature Hobby Boiler Inspection and Certification Requirements

Straightening STRAIGHTENING

Reinforcement with Geosynthetics

A Simple Design To Access Additional Energy From Real Resources

A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF SLOPE STABILITY USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD (FEM)

An Experimental Study on Variation of Shear Strength for Layered Soils

Modeling and Simulation of Axial Fan Using CFD Hemant Kumawat

CertainTeed. Finishing Products. Eastern Canada

Consolidation Stress Effect On Strength Of Lime Stabilized Soil

Design and Fabrication of Multipurpose Eco- Friendly Cleaning Machine

Model ESFR-17 Dry Type Pendent Sprinklers Early Suppression Fast Response 16.8 K-factor General Description

MODULUS CHARACTERISTICS OF GEOSYNTHETICS USED IN ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION

GEOTEXTILE DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINERS WITH FEM

Trade name of the construction product Injection system Hilti HIT-HY 110. This version replaces ETA-13/1037 issued on 17 January 2014

SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS GEOTEXTILE TUBES PARAGRAPH TITLE PAGE NOS.

Transcription:

SECM/15/140 BOND STRENGTH BEHAVIOR OF HEADED REINFORCEMENT BAR WITH VARYING EMBEDMENT LENGTH S. Gond 1 and Prof. S. M. Kulkarni 1* 1 Parul Institute of Engineering and Technology, Limda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India *E-Mail:Suhasini.kulkarni@paruluniversity.ac.in Abstract: Headed reinforcement is a relatively new product and has not been used in many applications. Headed reinforcing bars have been extensively used in the construction of offshore oil platforms where hooked bars have traditionally been used to anchor longitudinal reinforcement or bars bent for ties and transverse reinforcement. Hooks and bent-bar ties create a large amount of congestion in the reinforcing cage which leads to difficulties during construction. Using headed reinforcement removes the tail extensions of hooks and allows fewer larger bars to be used, greatly reducing the congestion of the reinforcing cage. It has been found that the use of headed reinforcement can greatly decrease the time needed to erect the reinforcement resulting in large cost savings. Headed reinforcement has also been used in a few projects for strengthening and repairing footings of highway structures. A total 81 Pullout test were performed to the study of Bond behavior of Headed reinforcement bar in concrete with different Embedment length with various diameters of bars, various grade of concrete and various sizes of cubes. In this research project, it is proposed to execute experimental work by using headed reinforcement bars. The effect of different parameters like embedment length, head shapes and concrete grades, threaded headed reinforcement bars can be study. The results will be used to develop design recommendations for the application of headed reinforcement bars. Keywords: headed reinforcement; pullout; embedment length; diameter of bars. 1. Introduction Headed bars are created by the attachment of a plate or nut to the end of a reinforcing bar to provide a large bearing area that can help anchor the tensile force in the bar. Figure 1.2 shows an example of a headed bar. The tensile force in the bar can be anchored by a combination of bearing on the ribs and on the head. This chapter discusses the current state-of-the-art of headed bar technology. Figure 1.1: Anchorage of a headed bar Relative Head Area = A nh = the net head area A gh = the gross head area A b = the nominal bar area defined by ASTM A615 1.1: ASTM Code: Designation A970/A970M 13A Standard Specification for Headed Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement. Specification covers deformed steel reinforcing bars in cut lengths, with a head attached to one or both ends for concrete reinforcement. Heads are forgeformed machined from bar stock, or cut from plate. Attachment can be accomplished through 47

Welding Integrally hot forging of a head from the reinforcing bar end Internal threads in the head mating to threads on the bar end Separate threaded nut to secure the head to the bar. Head dimensions shall define the head geometry including thickness, diameter 2. Preparation for Experiment Heads and Bars 20 mm, 16 mm, and 12 mm For 20 Mm Φ Bars Cube size (300X300X300) Headed bar Size 1. Square (50X50X10) mm, 2. Rect.(105 X30X10) mm, 3. Circular 57 mm dia. Figure 1.2: Headed Reinforcing Bar 1.2 Commentary Section 12.6 IN ACI 318 States The limitation on obstructions and interruptions of the deformations is included in Code Section 3.5.9 because there are a wide variety of methods to attach heads to bars, some of which involve obstructions or interruptions of the deformations that extend more than 2d b from the bearing face of the head. These systems were not evaluated in the tests used to formulate the provisions in Code Section 12.6.2, which were limited to systems that meet the criteria in Code Section 3.5.9. Some of the types of headed bars added to this specification after the 2009 version may have obstructions or interruptions in deformations exceeding the requirements of ACI 318 and thus not comply with the design requirements. Those types of headed bars explicitly satisfying the geometrical requirements in A970/A970M 09 and Annex A1, comply with the minimum requirements provided in ACI 318, Sections 3.5.9 and 12.6. or height and width of the head. For 16 MM Φ Bars Cube size (250X250X250) Headed bar size 1. Square (40X40X8)mm, 2. Rect. (67X30X8) mm, 3. Circular 46 mm dia. For 12 MM Φ Bars Cube size (200X200X200) Headed bar size 1. Square ( 30X30X6)mm. 2. Rect. ( 38X30X6) mm. 3. Circular 34 mm Dia No s of Specimens: Grade of Concrete Shape of Heads Rec. Square Circular Total No s of Specimens M20 9 9 9 81 M30 9 9 9 M40 9 9 9 Diameter of Bar Db mm Area of Bar (A ) b 2 mm Embedment Depth/Length (E ) mm d Thickness of Head (Th)mm 12 113.076 10D 120 160 200 6 b 16 201.024 12D 144 192 240 0.5D 8 b b 20 314.1 14D b 168 224 280 10 Square Size Rectangular Size Circular Dh mm A nh 2 mm 8A b Formwork size (A) 904.608 30x30 904.608 38x30 1152 34 200x200x200 1608.192 40x40 1608.192 67x30 1536 46 250x250x250 2512.8 50x50 2512.8 105x30 1920 57 300x300x300 48

3. Work Done Heads and Bars 12 mm, 16 mm, 20 mm Headed bar length is 1 m for all dia. of bars Specimen s formworks Specimen s castings 4. TESTING OF SPECIMENS : 49

5. Embedment lengths of headed bars 3R1,3R2,3R3 are the M30 Grade of Concrete Rectangular Head with different 5.1 Notifications of Specimens of 20mm 2R1,2R2,2R3 are the M20 Grade of Concrete Rectangular Head with different 50 4R1,4R2,4R3 are the M40 Grade of Concrete Rectangular Head with different 2S1,2S2,2S3 are the M20 Grade of Concrete Square Head with different 3S1,3S2,3S3 are the M30 Grade of Concrete Square Head with different 4S1,4S2,4S3 are the M40 Grade of Concrete Square Head with different 2C1,2C2,2C3 are the M20 Grade of Concrete Circular Head with different 3C1,3C2,3C3 are the M30 Grade of Concrete Circular Head with different 4C1,4C2,4C3 are the M40 Grade of Concrete Circular Head with different. These notifications are also applicable in 16mm dia. of Bars (embedment depth 160mm, 192mm, 224mm ) and 12 mm dia. of bars ( embedment depth 120mm,144mm,168mm) respectively.

5.2 Specimens testing photos (1) 2R1 = M20 Rect. Head with Embedment length 200mm (20mm dia. of Bar) Cracks Develops Specimens Set-up Splitting failure of Cube (SFC) pull out headed bar (2) 2S1 = M20 Square Head with Embedment length 200mm (20mm Dia. of Bar) Specimens Set-up Splitting failure of Cube 51

Pull out headed bar (3) 4R1 = M40 Rect. Head with Emb. Length 200mm (20mm Dia. of Bar) Specimens Set-up Specimens Set-up Crack formation Cracks formation Thread failure 5.3 Results & Conclusion (20mm,16mm,12mm Dia. Of Bars) Bond Stress - Different Embedment Length (a) Rect. Head, 20mm Dia., M20, M30 & M40 Thread failure (4) 3C2 = M30 Circular Head with Emb. Length 240mm (20mm Dia. of Bar) 52

(b) Square Head, 20mm Dia., M20, M30 &M40 (b)square. Head, 20mm Dia., M20, M30 & M40 (c) Circular Head,20mm Dia.,M20,M30& M40 (c)circular. Head, 20mm Dia., M20, M30 & M40 Bond Stress Max load (a) Rect. Head, 20mm Dia., M20, M30 & M40 These kinds of results are also found in 16mm dia. of Bars (embedment depth 160mm, 192mm, 224mm ) and 12 mm dia. of bars ( embedment depth 120mm,144mm,168mm) respectively Bond stress increases with increment in embedment length. 53

Pull out load increases with increment in embedment length. Abbreviations: A brg: Net Bearing Area Of The Head A b: The Bar Area Db: Diameter of Bar Ed: Embedment Length Ah: Area of Head Dh: Diameter of Head La: Anchorage Length Sh: Size of Head Hd:EmbedmentDepth Acknowledgement I would like to gratefully acknowledgement my Guide Prof. S M Kulkarni (PIET VADODARA) and my institutes (PIET VADODARA) for his precious guidance, constant inspiration and encouragement throughout the period of my dissertation. References [1]. ACI CODE A318 08 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete [2]. ASTM A 970/A 970 M 13 Standard Specification for Headed Steel bars for Concrete Reinforce. [3]. Dong uk choi Test of Headed Reinforcement pullout ( IJCSM august 30, 2006. [4]. Dong uk choi. Test 0f Headed Reinforcement pullout KCI JOURNAL SEP 5, 2002. [5]. www.hrc-europe.com [6]. www.erico.com [7]. www.utexas.edu 54