Appendix 3 Photographs of Surveyed Trees

Similar documents
Date Received: File Number: Staff Reviewer: 1. PROPERTY OWNER: Name: Address: Telephone: Fax:

Tree Risk Assessment. San Leandro Creek Location 2 Cary Dr. Alameda County Flood Control

PROTECTED TREE REPORT

Chaska Oaks Preservation Plan September 29, 2017

NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DECLINING CITY STREET TREES

City of Sebastopol Tree Board Staff Report

ACADEMY OF MONTESSORI EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION PLANS

CMG GardenNotes #613 Structural Training of Young Shade Trees

TREE INVENTORY LIST. Treatment Tag Dbh Height Dripline Species Condition Notes

Second Wednesdays 1:00 2:15 pm ET USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Enclave at Regal Oak Minnetonka, MN November 4, 2016 AE#14300

Appendix 1 Using the ISA Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY

CHAPTER 14.18: PROTECTED TREES

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

OAK TREE CARE. Care of California s Native Oaks

RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON THE ALMOND GROVE PHASE II PROJECT

Basic Pruning Techniques

City of Seaside Tree Maintenance and Inspection Policy

Identify and Manage Hazardous Defects in Your Trees

Tree Removal Application and Instructions

June 7, Mr. Brian. 150 North. Third Streett. Foote. On behalf. Master Plan Project. Disney Studios. I. Final EXHIBIT Q-1

Arroyo Grande Creek Flood Control Channel Vegetation Management: A Photo Series

Why be an advocate for street trees?

DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 2016

Imua Landscaping Co. Inc.

Pruning trees and shrubs: Getting started

SITE PREPARATION GRADING

Selecting Quality Trees from the Nursery. Created from research by Dr. Edward F. Gilman and Traci Partin (University of Florida)

How to Recognize - and Prevent - Hazard Trees By Tree City USA

DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 27, 2016 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR THE REMOVAL OF FIVE HERITAGE TREES AT 95 MERCEDES LANE (APN )

trunks. The main difference between shrubs and trees is size; trees are typically larger than shrubs.

Request for an Exception to the Napa County Road and Street Standards

Haywood County Historic Courthouse

Planting Containerized Trees

Description of Preferred Alternative

APPENDIX 4. 5 ST AGNES LOCAL LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT TABLE ST AGNES BEACON

MEMORANDUM OF BOG TURTLE HABITAT INVESTIGATION

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

Pruning of Mature Trees. Some Basic Principles

SOD Disease Management

Training and Pruning Peach Trees

Natural Target Pruning. Making Proper Pruning Cuts

Examination of South Cambridgeshire Local Plan

This Hazard Tree Recognition Training is dedicated to Gwen Saltis Trail Crew Leader, Inyo National Forest. July 19, 2003 Think about the future but

Hazard Tree Awareness

Triangle Land Conservancy Conservation Area Monitoring Report Carolina North

Staff Review Date: February 8, 2017 HDC PID#

Tree Compartmentalization: CODIT Model

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Zone: I-3. Tier:

Choosing the right Tree?

Considerations for Diagnosis of Ornamentals in the Landscape

Institutional Master Plan The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University

Middlebury RS 0174(8)

Planting and Establishment of Apple Trees A Quick Reference Guide

When to Prune? Late Winter-Early Spring

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. Proposed Land Use: 120 single-family lots. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

ADDENDUM TO BIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY REPORT, BOTANICAL SURVEY AND WETLAND DELINEATION

How Not to Prune Your Trees

IPED Inventory Pest Detection Initiative

Ci.ty e>f -V--:1rgi.rria Beach

Growing Raspberries in Southern Wisconsin. Lisa Johnson, Dane County UWEX

Unit E: Urban Forestry. Lesson 4: Pruning Trees in Urban Settings

Guideline Specifications for Nursery Tree Quality

Pruning Blueberry Plants in Florida 1

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 February 09. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

SFF Project Milestone M06 Regional Field Days Report March Increasing the Market Share for New Zealand Olive Oil

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

May 23, EIR. On behalf. eligible. the adoption

2016 Annual Inspection Report

Cottonwood. Pest Damage on. Plant Problem. September September 1 10 October September November November November 1 10

Pruning Timing Options to Avoid Wood Diseases in Young Almonds. Carolyn DeBuse, Farm Advisor Solano & Yolo Counties

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department KENNEDY DEVELOPMENTS LTD. OUTLINE PLAN OP-09-01

Abiotic (Non-infectious) Tree Problems


49 Broughton Avenue London N3 3EN

Tree Survey Report For:

MASTER DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE PLAN FOR MONUMENT HEIGHTS

LANTw26 - SQA Unit Code H2SP 04 Use a pole mounted pruner

Reconstruction Project. Wayzata Task Force Meeting September 3, 2009

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING

LAND USE AMENDMENT CORNERSTONE (WARD 3) COUNTRY HILLS BOULEVARD AND STONEY TRAIL NE BYLAW 9D2017

A.A.R.F.P. Pruning Workshop Arnold Heuver Consulting April 2018

Arborist Report. Prepared for. Elaine and Jeff Klemzak 2861 Piedmont Ave. La Crescenta, CA 91214

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: March 17, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 5I

PROTECTIVE MEASURES FOR TREES DURING CONSTRUCTION

Select the location: Dig a wide planting hole: Place the tree in the hole at the proper height: Backfill with soil around the rootball:

Memorandum. DATE October 27, Lambert Giessinger, Historic Preservation Architect Office of Historic Resources

STORMWATER REPORT FOR WALMART SUPERCENTER STORE # SIOUX FALLS, LINCOLN COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA BFA PROJECT NO

ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Proposed Relocation for Ninth Line, Markham and Whitchurch-Stouffville. Environmental Screening Report

Heron Glen Wetland Buffer Enhancement Project. Progress Report. August 10, 2004 (resent October 19, 2004)

Tree Inventory Plan and Appendices

Arborist Structural failure profile: Monterey Cypress (Hesperocyparis macrocarpa)

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums1

Planting and Establishment

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

TREES AND VIEWS: TREE MANAGEMENT + PRUNING

Crossroads Hollywood, ENV EIR 1 message

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Review Process

PRUNING LANDSCAPE TREES. By Larry Figart, Urban Forestry Extension Agent Duval County Extension Service

Transcription:

Appendix 3 Photographs of Surveyed Trees

Tree #302 Tree #303 Tree #301 Tree #304 Tree #305 Tree #306 Tree #307 AGOURA ROAD HOTEL OAKS Photos of Surveyed Trees PLATE 1

Tree #310 Tree #308 Tree #309 Tree #311 Tree #312 Tree #313 Tree #314 Tree #315 AGOURA ROAD HOTEL OAKS Photos of Surveyed Trees PLATE 2

#320 #319 Tree #316 Tree #317 Tree #318 Trees #319 & #320 Tree #327 Tree #321 Tree #334 Tree #335 AGOURA ROAD HOTEL OAKS Photos of Surveyed Trees PLATE 3

#340 #339 #338 #341 #337 #336 Tree #342 Trees #336 & #337 Trees #338, #339, #340 & #341 Tree #343 Tree #344 Tree #345 Tree #346 Tree #347 Tree #246 AGOURA ROAD HOTEL OAKS Photos of Surveyed Trees PLATE 4

November 24, 2015 City of Agoura Hills Department of Planning and Community Development 3001 Ladyface Court Agoura Hills, CA 93065 Attn: Mr. Greg Ainsworth Subj: Response to Memorandum: CUP-01150, VAR-01153-2015, OAK-01153-2015, SIGN-01152-2015 - Kruse Huntington Hotel Group - APN 2062-004-030 Dear Mr. Ainsworth: Envicom Corporation is providing this letter in response to your comments presented in the memorandum dated October 27, 2015 regarding CUP-01150, VAR-01153-2015, OAK-01153-2015, SIGN-01152-2015 - Kruse Huntington Hotel Group - APN 2062-004-030. A summary of our responses to your comments is provided below. In addition, based on the Grading and Drainage Plan prepared by Stantec provided on November 23, 2015, response #6 addresses additional updates to the impact analyses provided in the Agoura Road Oak Tree Report dated August 2015. 1. Four (4) 36-inch box trees will be provided to offset the removal of Tree 342. 2. Based on my conversation with you, we agreed that Trees 301 and 302 remain outside the 4-foot construction buffer proposed for the retaining wall. Thus, proposed construction activities will not encroach into the TPZ associated with either of these trees. 3. No encroachments will occur within the TPZ associated with Tree 335. Based on our conversation, I understand that your comment more specifically relates to whether the proposed development would provide adequate drainage for trees 334-341, 343, 346, and 348. As indicated on the revised Tree Location and Project Impacts Map, the existing grades and topography in the area surrounding the subject trees will be retained. The existing topography provides drainage to the northeast away from the trees to a low area outside the TPZs of the subject trees that is approximately four feet lower in elevation. Here, water will enter a storm drain located along the eastern edge of the property designed to convey flows away from the subject trees and into the existing Los Angeles County storm drain. 4. We concur and the Tree Location and Project Impacts Map has been revised to reflect this change and has been provided on Figure 1. 5. A total of 17 additional trees, one (1) onsite and 16 offsite, were included in this survey and the Tree Location and Project Impacts Map has been revised accordingly. Based on this update, the TPZ of one additional tree, Tree #220, will be encroached into during construction of the retaining wall along the western edge of the property. Specifically, the

November 24, 2015 Response to Memorandum: CUP-01150, VAR-01153-2015, OAK-01153-2015, SIGN-00152-2015 - Kruse Huntington Hotel Group - APN 2062-004-030 Page 2 of 2 construction buffer of the 4 retaining wall is located approximately 4 east outside the dripline, encroaching into approximately 8% of the TPZ. This minor encroachment will not require the existing grade within the dripline nor the height of the canopy to be altered. Based on these assumptions it is not anticipated that these TPZ encroachments will significantly affect the health or vigor of the tree. The proposed Project activities will remain outside the TPZ associated with the other 16 trees. The Tree Survey Data Forms and Photos of Surveyed Trees have been provided as Appendix 1 and Plates 1 and 2. 6. Based upon the updated Grading and Drainage Plan, the limits of grading in the southwest corner of the property will no longer encroach into the TPZ associated with Tree #327. The Tree Location and Project Impacts Map has been revised to reflect these changes (Figure 1). In summary, the proposed project would result in removal of one (1) landmark tree (Tree # 342) and anticipated encroachments within the TPZ of five (5) trees, including four (4) coast live oaks (Tree #s 220, 303, 304, and 347) and one (1) scrub oak (Tree # 345). This analysis does not address potential impacts resulting from construction activities associated with the Agoura Road widening along the southern edge of the property. If you have further questions, please contact me at Envicom Corporation at (818) 879-4700. Sincerely, Erin Roberts Biologist / Certified Arborist WE-10365A Attachments: Figure 1 - Revised Tree Location and Project Impacts Map Appendix 1 - Tree Survey Data Forms Plates 1 and 2 - Photos of Surveyed Trees

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts SPECIES FORM TREE NUMBER 218 Quercus agrifolia X X X Quercus lobata Quercus berberidifolia Other TREE HEIGHT (~ FEET) 23.0 20.0 23.0 LEAN S W TRUNK DIAMETER / CIRCUMFERENCE (INCHES) 220 247 9.9/31.0 8.0/25.0 7.5/23.5 PHYSICAL CONDITION TREATMENT RATING TRUNK CAVITY TRUNK EXUDATION TRUNK DAMAGE BURIED ROOT COLLAR EXPOSED ROOTS WEAK CROTCH FUNGAL DISEASE INSECT DAMAGE X FIRE DAMAGE (NEW/OLD) BRANCH CAVITIES MAINSTEM DIEBACK TWIG/BRANCH DIEBACK EPICORMIC GROWTH X THIN FOLIAGE DROUGHT STRESSED UNBALANCED CROWN EXC. HORIZONTAL BRANCH. VIGOR (GOOD/MOD/POOR) GOOD GOOD GOOD TERRAIN (SLOPE/LEVEL) SLOPE LEVEL SLOPE REMOVE DEADWOOD INSECT TREATMENT DISEASE TREATMENT SAFETY PRUNE HERITAGE HEALTH A A A AESTHETICS & CONFORMITY A A A Located on a slight slope; Scale insects present on underside of leaves.

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts SPECIES FORM TREE NUMBER 248 Quercus agrifolia X X X Quercus lobata Quercus berberidifolia Other TREE HEIGHT (~ FEET) 20.0 15.0 15.0 LEAN N S S TRUNK DIAMETER / CIRCUMFERENCE (INCHES) 249 250 5.1/16.0 3.8/12.0 3.5/11.0 PHYSICAL CONDITION TREATMENT RATING TRUNK CAVITY TRUNK EXUDATION TRUNK DAMAGE BURIED ROOT COLLAR EXPOSED ROOTS WEAK CROTCH FUNGAL DISEASE INSECT DAMAGE X FIRE DAMAGE (NEW/OLD) BRANCH CAVITIES MAINSTEM DIEBACK TWIG/BRANCH DIEBACK EPICORMIC GROWTH X THIN FOLIAGE X X DROUGHT STRESSED UNBALANCED CROWN EXC. HORIZONTAL BRANCH. VIGOR (GOOD/MOD/POOR) GOOD GOOD GOOD TERRAIN (SLOPE/LEVEL) SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE REMOVE DEADWOOD INSECT TREATMENT DISEASE TREATMENT SAFETY PRUNE HERITAGE HEALTH B A B AESTHETICS & CONFORMITY B A B Galls

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts SPECIES FORM TREE NUMBER 251 Quercus agrifolia X X X Quercus lobata Quercus berberidifolia Other TREE HEIGHT (~ FEET) 15.0 15.0 18.0 LEAN S S SE TRUNK DIAMETER / CIRCUMFERENCE (INCHES) 252 253 3.5/11.0 4.5/14.0 11.8/37.0 PHYSICAL CONDITION TREATMENT RATING TRUNK CAVITY TRUNK EXUDATION TRUNK DAMAGE BURIED ROOT COLLAR EXPOSED ROOTS WEAK CROTCH FUNGAL DISEASE INSECT DAMAGE FIRE DAMAGE (NEW/OLD) BRANCH CAVITIES MAINSTEM DIEBACK TWIG/BRANCH DIEBACK EPICORMIC GROWTH THIN FOLIAGE X X X DROUGHT STRESSED UNBALANCED CROWN EXC. HORIZONTAL BRANCH. VIGOR (GOOD/MOD/POOR) GOOD GOOD GOOD TERRAIN (SLOPE/LEVEL) SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE REMOVE DEADWOOD INSECT TREATMENT DISEASE TREATMENT SAFETY PRUNE HERITAGE HEALTH B B B AESTHETICS & CONFORMITY B B C Heavy lean

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts SPECIES FORM TREE NUMBER 348 Quercus agrifolia X X X Quercus lobata Quercus berberidifolia Other TREE HEIGHT (~ FEET) 8.0 20.0 14.0 LEAN SE NE & N N TRUNK DIAMETER / CIRCUMFERENCE (INCHES) 349 350 2.2/7.0 11.8/37.0 2.9/9.0 PHYSICAL CONDITION TREATMENT RATING TRUNK CAVITY TRUNK EXUDATION TRUNK DAMAGE BURIED ROOT COLLAR EXPOSED ROOTS WEAK CROTCH FUNGAL DISEASE INSECT DAMAGE X X FIRE DAMAGE (NEW/OLD) BRANCH CAVITIES MAINSTEM DIEBACK TWIG/BRANCH DIEBACK EPICORMIC GROWTH THIN FOLIAGE X X DROUGHT STRESSED UNBALANCED CROWN EXC. HORIZONTAL BRANCH. VIGOR (GOOD/MOD/POOR) MOD GOOD GOOD TERRAIN (SLOPE/LEVEL) LEVEL SLOPE SLOPE REMOVE DEADWOOD INSECT TREATMENT DISEASE TREATMENT SAFETY PRUNE HERITAGE HEALTH C B A AESTHETICS & CONFORMITY C B A Scale insects present on underside of leaves. Slight dieback of understory branches. Galls

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts SPECIES FORM TREE NUMBER 351 Quercus agrifolia X X X Quercus lobata Quercus berberidifolia Other TREE HEIGHT (~ FEET) 20.0 10.0 16.0 LEAN TRUNK DIAMETER / CIRCUMFERENCE (INCHES) W 352 353 11.1/35.0 4.1/13.0 4.8/15.0 3.8/12.0 5.4/17.0 2.5/8.0 PHYSICAL CONDITION TREATMENT RATING TRUNK CAVITY TRUNK EXUDATION TRUNK DAMAGE BURIED ROOT COLLAR EXPOSED ROOTS WEAK CROTCH FUNGAL DISEASE INSECT DAMAGE X X FIRE DAMAGE (NEW/OLD) BRANCH CAVITIES MAINSTEM DIEBACK TWIG/BRANCH DIEBACK EPICORMIC GROWTH X THIN FOLIAGE X X DROUGHT STRESSED UNBALANCED CROWN EXC. HORIZONTAL BRANCH. VIGOR (GOOD/MOD/POOR) GOOD GOOD GOOD TERRAIN (SLOPE/LEVEL) SLOPE SLOPE LEVEL REMOVE DEADWOOD INSECT TREATMENT DISEASE TREATMENT SAFETY PRUNE HERITAGE HEALTH A B A AESTHETICS & CONFORMITY A B A Evidence of leaf miners. Scale insects present on underside of leaves.

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts TREE NUMBER 354 355 SPECIES Quercus agrifolia X X Quercus lobata Quercus berberidifolia Other TREE HEIGHT (~ FEET) 15.0 20.0 LEAN S FORM TRUNK DIAMETER / CIRCUMFERENCE (INCHES) 6.4/20.0 12.1/38.0 TRUNK CAVITY TRUNK EXUDATION TRUNK DAMAGE BURIED ROOT COLLAR EXPOSED ROOTS WEAK CROTCH FUNGAL DISEASE PHYSICAL CONDITION TREATMENT RATING INSECT DAMAGE FIRE DAMAGE (NEW/OLD) BRANCH CAVITIES MAINSTEM DIEBACK TWIG/BRANCH DIEBACK EPICORMIC GROWTH THIN FOLIAGE X DROUGHT STRESSED UNBALANCED CROWN EXC. HORIZONTAL BRANCH. VIGOR (GOOD/MOD/POOR) GOOD GOOD TERRAIN (SLOPE/LEVEL) SLOPE LEVEL REMOVE DEADWOOD INSECT TREATMENT DISEASE TREATMENT SAFETY PRUNE HERITAGE DBH measured below fork approximately 2.4 from base. HEALTH B A AESTHETICS & CONFORMITY B A

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts DRIPLINE MEASUREMENTS TREE NUMBER NORTH NE EAST SE SOUTH SW WEST NW 218 7 0 5 0 4 0 7 0 6 0 11 0 11 0 10 0 220 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 247 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 6 0 6 0 248 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 249 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 250 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 251 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 252 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 253 5 0 4 0 8 0 15 0 18 0 18 0 4 0 4 0 348 2 0 7 0 7 0 8 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 349 11 0 11 0 7 0 8 0 6 0 4 0 5 0 7 0 350 6 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 351 6 0 6 0 5 0 5 0 7 0 9 0 7 0 5 0 352 3 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 353 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 354 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 355 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0

Tree #218 Tree #220 Tree #247 Tree #248 #252 #251 #250 Tree #249 Trees #252, #251, #250 Tree #253 Tree #348 AGOURA ROAD HOTEL OAKS Photos of Surveyed Trees PLATE 1

Tree #349 Tree #350 Tree #352 Tree #353 Tree #354 Tree #355 AGOURA ROAD HOTEL OAKS Photos of Surveyed Trees PLATE 2

November 24, 2015 City of Agoura Hills Department of Planning and Community Development 3001 Ladyface Court Agoura Hills, CA 93065 Attn: Mr. Greg Ainsworth Subj: Response to Memorandum: CUP-01150, VAR-01153-2015, OAK-01153-2015, SIGN-01152-2015 - Kruse Huntington Hotel Group - APN 2062-004-030 Dear Mr. Ainsworth: Envicom Corporation is providing this letter in response to your comments presented in the memorandum dated October 27, 2015 regarding CUP-01150, VAR-01153-2015, OAK-01153-2015, SIGN-01152-2015 - Kruse Huntington Hotel Group - APN 2062-004-030. A summary of our responses to your comments is provided below. In addition, based on the Grading and Drainage Plan prepared by Stantec provided on November 23, 2015, response #6 addresses additional updates to the impact analyses provided in the Agoura Road Oak Tree Report dated August 2015. 1. Four (4) 36-inch box trees will be provided to offset the removal of Tree 342. 2. Based on my conversation with you, we agreed that Trees 301 and 302 remain outside the 4-foot construction buffer proposed for the retaining wall. Thus, proposed construction activities will not encroach into the TPZ associated with either of these trees. 3. No encroachments will occur within the TPZ associated with Tree 335. Based on our conversation, I understand that your comment more specifically relates to whether the proposed development would provide adequate drainage for trees 334-341, 343, 346, and 348. As indicated on the revised Tree Location and Project Impacts Map, the existing grades and topography in the area surrounding the subject trees will be retained. The existing topography provides drainage to the northeast away from the trees to a low area outside the TPZs of the subject trees that is approximately four feet lower in elevation. Here, water will enter a storm drain located along the eastern edge of the property designed to convey flows away from the subject trees and into the existing Los Angeles County storm drain. 4. We concur and the Tree Location and Project Impacts Map has been revised to reflect this change and has been provided on Figure 1. 5. A total of 17 additional trees, one (1) onsite and 16 offsite, were included in this survey and the Tree Location and Project Impacts Map has been revised accordingly. Based on this update, the TPZ of one additional tree, Tree #220, will be encroached into during construction of the retaining wall along the western edge of the property. Specifically, the

November 24, 2015 Response to Memorandum: CUP-01150, VAR-01153-2015, OAK-01153-2015, SIGN-00152-2015 - Kruse Huntington Hotel Group - APN 2062-004-030 Page 2 of 2 construction buffer of the 4 retaining wall is located approximately 4 east outside the dripline, encroaching into approximately 8% of the TPZ. This minor encroachment will not require the existing grade within the dripline nor the height of the canopy to be altered. Based on these assumptions it is not anticipated that these TPZ encroachments will significantly affect the health or vigor of the tree. The proposed Project activities will remain outside the TPZ associated with the other 16 trees. The Tree Survey Data Forms and Photos of Surveyed Trees have been provided as Appendix 1 and Plates 1 and 2. 6. Based upon the updated Grading and Drainage Plan, the limits of grading in the southwest corner of the property will no longer encroach into the TPZ associated with Tree #327. The Tree Location and Project Impacts Map has been revised to reflect these changes (Figure 1). In summary, the proposed project would result in removal of one (1) landmark tree (Tree # 342) and anticipated encroachments within the TPZ of five (5) trees, including four (4) coast live oaks (Tree #s 220, 303, 304, and 347) and one (1) scrub oak (Tree # 345). This analysis does not address potential impacts resulting from construction activities associated with the Agoura Road widening along the southern edge of the property. If you have further questions, please contact me at Envicom Corporation at (818) 879-4700. Sincerely, Erin Roberts Biologist / Certified Arborist WE-10365A Attachments: Figure 1 - Revised Tree Location and Project Impacts Map Appendix 1 - Tree Survey Data Forms Plates 1 and 2 - Photos of Surveyed Trees

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts SPECIES FORM TREE NUMBER 218 Quercus agrifolia X X X Quercus lobata Quercus berberidifolia Other TREE HEIGHT (~ FEET) 23.0 20.0 23.0 LEAN S W TRUNK DIAMETER / CIRCUMFERENCE (INCHES) 220 247 9.9/31.0 8.0/25.0 7.5/23.5 PHYSICAL CONDITION TREATMENT RATING TRUNK CAVITY TRUNK EXUDATION TRUNK DAMAGE BURIED ROOT COLLAR EXPOSED ROOTS WEAK CROTCH FUNGAL DISEASE INSECT DAMAGE X FIRE DAMAGE (NEW/OLD) BRANCH CAVITIES MAINSTEM DIEBACK TWIG/BRANCH DIEBACK EPICORMIC GROWTH X THIN FOLIAGE DROUGHT STRESSED UNBALANCED CROWN EXC. HORIZONTAL BRANCH. VIGOR (GOOD/MOD/POOR) GOOD GOOD GOOD TERRAIN (SLOPE/LEVEL) SLOPE LEVEL SLOPE REMOVE DEADWOOD INSECT TREATMENT DISEASE TREATMENT SAFETY PRUNE HERITAGE HEALTH A A A AESTHETICS & CONFORMITY A A A Located on a slight slope; Scale insects present on underside of leaves.

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts SPECIES FORM TREE NUMBER 248 Quercus agrifolia X X X Quercus lobata Quercus berberidifolia Other TREE HEIGHT (~ FEET) 20.0 15.0 15.0 LEAN N S S TRUNK DIAMETER / CIRCUMFERENCE (INCHES) 249 250 5.1/16.0 3.8/12.0 3.5/11.0 PHYSICAL CONDITION TREATMENT RATING TRUNK CAVITY TRUNK EXUDATION TRUNK DAMAGE BURIED ROOT COLLAR EXPOSED ROOTS WEAK CROTCH FUNGAL DISEASE INSECT DAMAGE X FIRE DAMAGE (NEW/OLD) BRANCH CAVITIES MAINSTEM DIEBACK TWIG/BRANCH DIEBACK EPICORMIC GROWTH X THIN FOLIAGE X X DROUGHT STRESSED UNBALANCED CROWN EXC. HORIZONTAL BRANCH. VIGOR (GOOD/MOD/POOR) GOOD GOOD GOOD TERRAIN (SLOPE/LEVEL) SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE REMOVE DEADWOOD INSECT TREATMENT DISEASE TREATMENT SAFETY PRUNE HERITAGE HEALTH B A B AESTHETICS & CONFORMITY B A B Galls

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts SPECIES FORM TREE NUMBER 251 Quercus agrifolia X X X Quercus lobata Quercus berberidifolia Other TREE HEIGHT (~ FEET) 15.0 15.0 18.0 LEAN S S SE TRUNK DIAMETER / CIRCUMFERENCE (INCHES) 252 253 3.5/11.0 4.5/14.0 11.8/37.0 PHYSICAL CONDITION TREATMENT RATING TRUNK CAVITY TRUNK EXUDATION TRUNK DAMAGE BURIED ROOT COLLAR EXPOSED ROOTS WEAK CROTCH FUNGAL DISEASE INSECT DAMAGE FIRE DAMAGE (NEW/OLD) BRANCH CAVITIES MAINSTEM DIEBACK TWIG/BRANCH DIEBACK EPICORMIC GROWTH THIN FOLIAGE X X X DROUGHT STRESSED UNBALANCED CROWN EXC. HORIZONTAL BRANCH. VIGOR (GOOD/MOD/POOR) GOOD GOOD GOOD TERRAIN (SLOPE/LEVEL) SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE REMOVE DEADWOOD INSECT TREATMENT DISEASE TREATMENT SAFETY PRUNE HERITAGE HEALTH B B B AESTHETICS & CONFORMITY B B C Heavy lean

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts SPECIES FORM TREE NUMBER 348 Quercus agrifolia X X X Quercus lobata Quercus berberidifolia Other TREE HEIGHT (~ FEET) 8.0 20.0 14.0 LEAN SE NE & N N TRUNK DIAMETER / CIRCUMFERENCE (INCHES) 349 350 2.2/7.0 11.8/37.0 2.9/9.0 PHYSICAL CONDITION TREATMENT RATING TRUNK CAVITY TRUNK EXUDATION TRUNK DAMAGE BURIED ROOT COLLAR EXPOSED ROOTS WEAK CROTCH FUNGAL DISEASE INSECT DAMAGE X X FIRE DAMAGE (NEW/OLD) BRANCH CAVITIES MAINSTEM DIEBACK TWIG/BRANCH DIEBACK EPICORMIC GROWTH THIN FOLIAGE X X DROUGHT STRESSED UNBALANCED CROWN EXC. HORIZONTAL BRANCH. VIGOR (GOOD/MOD/POOR) MOD GOOD GOOD TERRAIN (SLOPE/LEVEL) LEVEL SLOPE SLOPE REMOVE DEADWOOD INSECT TREATMENT DISEASE TREATMENT SAFETY PRUNE HERITAGE HEALTH C B A AESTHETICS & CONFORMITY C B A Scale insects present on underside of leaves. Slight dieback of understory branches. Galls

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts SPECIES FORM TREE NUMBER 351 Quercus agrifolia X X X Quercus lobata Quercus berberidifolia Other TREE HEIGHT (~ FEET) 20.0 10.0 16.0 LEAN TRUNK DIAMETER / CIRCUMFERENCE (INCHES) W 352 353 11.1/35.0 4.1/13.0 4.8/15.0 3.8/12.0 5.4/17.0 2.5/8.0 PHYSICAL CONDITION TREATMENT RATING TRUNK CAVITY TRUNK EXUDATION TRUNK DAMAGE BURIED ROOT COLLAR EXPOSED ROOTS WEAK CROTCH FUNGAL DISEASE INSECT DAMAGE X X FIRE DAMAGE (NEW/OLD) BRANCH CAVITIES MAINSTEM DIEBACK TWIG/BRANCH DIEBACK EPICORMIC GROWTH X THIN FOLIAGE X X DROUGHT STRESSED UNBALANCED CROWN EXC. HORIZONTAL BRANCH. VIGOR (GOOD/MOD/POOR) GOOD GOOD GOOD TERRAIN (SLOPE/LEVEL) SLOPE SLOPE LEVEL REMOVE DEADWOOD INSECT TREATMENT DISEASE TREATMENT SAFETY PRUNE HERITAGE HEALTH A B A AESTHETICS & CONFORMITY A B A Evidence of leaf miners. Scale insects present on underside of leaves.

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts TREE NUMBER 354 355 SPECIES Quercus agrifolia X X Quercus lobata Quercus berberidifolia Other TREE HEIGHT (~ FEET) 15.0 20.0 LEAN S FORM TRUNK DIAMETER / CIRCUMFERENCE (INCHES) 6.4/20.0 12.1/38.0 TRUNK CAVITY TRUNK EXUDATION TRUNK DAMAGE BURIED ROOT COLLAR EXPOSED ROOTS WEAK CROTCH FUNGAL DISEASE PHYSICAL CONDITION TREATMENT RATING INSECT DAMAGE FIRE DAMAGE (NEW/OLD) BRANCH CAVITIES MAINSTEM DIEBACK TWIG/BRANCH DIEBACK EPICORMIC GROWTH THIN FOLIAGE X DROUGHT STRESSED UNBALANCED CROWN EXC. HORIZONTAL BRANCH. VIGOR (GOOD/MOD/POOR) GOOD GOOD TERRAIN (SLOPE/LEVEL) SLOPE LEVEL REMOVE DEADWOOD INSECT TREATMENT DISEASE TREATMENT SAFETY PRUNE HERITAGE DBH measured below fork approximately 2.4 from base. HEALTH B A AESTHETICS & CONFORMITY B A

PROJECT: Agoura Rd. Hotel DATE: November 2015 PREPARER: E. Roberts DRIPLINE MEASUREMENTS TREE NUMBER NORTH NE EAST SE SOUTH SW WEST NW 218 7 0 5 0 4 0 7 0 6 0 11 0 11 0 10 0 220 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 247 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 6 0 6 0 248 4 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 249 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 250 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 251 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 252 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 253 5 0 4 0 8 0 15 0 18 0 18 0 4 0 4 0 348 2 0 7 0 7 0 8 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 349 11 0 11 0 7 0 8 0 6 0 4 0 5 0 7 0 350 6 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 351 6 0 6 0 5 0 5 0 7 0 9 0 7 0 5 0 352 3 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 353 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 354 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 355 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0

Tree #218 Tree #220 Tree #247 Tree #248 #252 #251 #250 Tree #249 Trees #252, #251, #250 Tree #253 Tree #348 AGOURA ROAD HOTEL OAKS Photos of Surveyed Trees PLATE 1

Tree #349 Tree #350 Tree #352 Tree #353 Tree #354 Tree #355 AGOURA ROAD HOTEL OAKS Photos of Surveyed Trees PLATE 2