L 4-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Kodors House. 35 Rosedale Avenue West

Similar documents
L 2-1 HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. Cheyne Family Cemetery. Main Street South

HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. 62 Union Street. Prepared By:

L 1-1. Reason. ns for Heritage Designa

L 3-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Peter Archdekin Farmhouse Mayfield Road

HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. 37 Church Street East. Prepared By:

Authority: North York Community Council Item 31.7, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No.

L 3-1. Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation. Wiley Bridge Gorewood Drive, Claireville Conservation Area

Memo. B R A Y H e r i t a g e

Morgan s Subdivision Historic District Character-defining Features

Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Roncesvalles Avenue

Baker Historic District

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE34.30, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014 CITY OF TORONTO

2154 Dundas Street West Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION

Historic Resources Inventory Evaluation Form

Architectural Inventory Form

This property contributes to the historic streetscape of Colborne Street and its striking architecture makes it a landmark along the street.

Architectural Inventory Form (page 1 of 5)

Tazewell Pike. Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Design Guidelines

THE AVENUES HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT STUDY BUILDING INVENTORY SHEET

NEW EDINBURGH HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

Heritage Designation Brief. Bonner Worth Mill: Administration Building

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Study Public Consultation March 26, 2013

GUIDELINES REPLACEMENT HOUSING GUIDELINES LOCATION INTRODUCTION URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

BENSON / HUNT TERTIARY PLAN

IMPORTANT NOTICE. Architectural Inventory Form COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY I. IDENTIFICATION th Street 5WL.5601

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON MONDAY AUGUST 28, 2017 JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

Historic Yonge Street HCD Plan Community Consultation October 14, 2015

Adversely impact the cultural heritage value of properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA).

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

Cookstown Heritage Conservation District Plan Heritage Workshop Public Open House September 10, 2013

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

HOMEWOOD. Architectural Style Guide

Duplex Design Guidelines

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

Part A. District Overview. Thornhill-Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan 1

THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LOCAL LANDMARK NOMINATION INSTRUCTIONS

Urban Design Brief 1576 Richmond Street City of London

Architectural Inventory Form

Design Guidelines. High Point Estates Design Guidelines April Gomberoff Bell Lyon Architects Group Inc.

Architectural Inventory Form

Housing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner

4.3 Dudley Area Plan. Introduction. History and Existing Character. Desired Future Character for Dudley

Baby Point Heritage Conservation District Study. Kick-off Community Meeting March 27, 2017 Humbercrest United Church

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

RE: Report CDS (Municipal Heritage Committee Minutes May 8, 2018) Randwood Estate

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

11.1 INTRODUCTION. The characteristics of these areas are briefly discussed below.

CITY OF VAUGHAN REPORT NO. 5 OF THE HERITAGE VAUGHAN COMMITTEE

Conservation Area Designation, amendments and Review

Attachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH. Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report

EAST OF ENGLAND OFFICE

Name / Date of Reason for Designation. 1. Ball s Mill c.1842 A good example of a mill in neo-classical style

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Heritage Property 70 Liberty Street (Central Prison Chapel)

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement Queen's Park

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

Ordnance Street 110 Plan OS Lot 413 B202; parts of Lot 412 and portion of Lot 413

Royal Thai Embassy Ottawa. Major Zoning Amendment Proposal for 180 Island Park Drive. Planning Rationale

UPPER GORDON ROAD TO CHURCH HILL, CAMBERLEY CONSERVATION AREA

YONGE STEELES CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN. Young + Wright / IBI Group Architects Dillon Consulting Ltd. GHK International (Canada) Ltd.

Historic Yonge Street HCD Study Public Meeting #2

2: Bond Street, I.O.F Orphanage

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Focused Area - Official Plan Amendment Status Report

The NWX American Foursquare

PRESENTED: April 15, 2008 FILE: DP No. 273/ Development Permit No Government Road Townhomes

Architectural Inventory Form

MOMENTUM. Design Brief. Site Plan Control and Minor Variance Applications. 59 Russell Avenue

ROCKCLIFFE PARK HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN DRAFT

Broadview Avenue Properties Inclusion on Heritage Inventory

Authorization to Study Potential Heritage Conservation Districts (HCD) under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act

Analysis of Environs of 1000 New York Street, German Methodist Episcopal Church

Chapter 8: BEACH SOUTH OF ATLANTIC AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA ANALYSIS

D18. Special Character Areas Overlay Residential and Business

SOLOMONS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN MANUAL

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

Draft Part 11 Heritage Area Plans West Wallsend / Holmesville


CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS

Ottawa Historic Resources Inventory: Commercial Historic District Building Information. Significance and Potential Eligibility

Chapel Hill Historic District Commission MILES RESIDENCE. Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness 240 Glandon Drive PIN

Part 11 Heritage Area Plans West Wallsend / Holmesville

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

GUIDELINES TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL LOCATION. INTRODUCTION Existing College Wing Buildings and Site Plan - Figure 1A and Figure 1B.

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

West Slope Neighborhood Design Guidelines. Kick-off Meeting February 5, 2015 Titlow Lodge 6:00 8:00 pm

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS

429 Lansdowne Road Building or Property Name. Original owner

58: 1285 Sedgewick Crescent, Rotary Gardens

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

2 Nelson City Council Dear Cottages

APPENDIX MATAKANA COMMERCIAL URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

APPENDIX K WINDSOR OFFICIAL PLAN

Planning Justification Brief

KEY MAP DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA MAP. Sunnymede North Sub-Area Plan

Conservation Area Designation, amendments and Review

APPENDIX 9 HERITAGE CHARACTER

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT

Transcription:

L 4-1 Brampton Heritage Board Date: January 17, 2012 Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation Kodors House 35 Rosedale Avenue West December 2011 1

L 4-2 Profile of Subject Property Municipal Address 35 Rosedale Avenue West PIN Number 1412-20127 Roll Number 10-04-0-035-09300-0000 Legal Description Plan D12, Part Lot 53, 54 Ward Number 5 Property Name Kodors Home Current Owner Brent Peters and Heidi Philips Owner Concurrence Yes Current Zoning Current Use(s) Residential Construction Date Circa 1924 Notable Owners or Occupants Heritage Resources on Subject Property Relevant Council Resolutions James Knapman; George Burrows; Walter and Waultraud Kodors Building; miniature castle garden feature; contributing contextual value Additional Information 2

L 4-3 1. Introduction The property at 35 Rosedale Avenue West is worthy of designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value or interest. The property meets the criteria for designation prescribed by the Province of Ontario under Ontario Heritage Act, Regulation 9/06 for the categories of design/physical value and contextual value. 2. Description of Property 35 Rosedale Avenue West is within a residential plan of subdivision known as D-12, registered in August 1912 and known as the Rosedale plan of subdivision. The focal point of the subject property is a single detached, one-and-a-half storey brick masonry house with a prominent front gabled dormer widow and full-length open verandah. The home is situated on a prominent south-west corner lot shared with Lowes Avenue. The house has a rectangular plan and faces Rosedale Avenue West. Also of note is a whimsical and prominent garden feature in the form of a miniature castle with towers and stone walls. The feature is located along the Lowes Avenue side of the property toward the rear portion of the lot and is surrounded by gardens. The property appears to be partially situated within the creek bed created by the long dormant Mains Creek. The creek once ran in a north-south direction along what is today Lowes Avenue and through a portion of downtown Brampton. A new detached single car garage with a paved driveway out to Rosedale Avenue is located on the west side of the property. 3. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest The cultural heritage value of 35 Rosedale Avenue West is related primarily to the design or physical value of the house, along with contextual value. Design/Physical Value From a design perspective, the subject property is a good and generally well-preserved example of a one-and-a-half storey, side gabled bungalow exhibiting design influences of the American Arts and Crafts style (more typically known as the Craftsman style). In this instance, the Craftsman influences are seen in the overall massing of the house with its sloped low pitched roofline, as well as the large front dormer window and full front open verandah. Also of note are two leaded, stained glass windows on the east façade of the house. The house also exhibits Edwardian influence in the prominent rectangular stone lintels over most windows and rusticated stone foundation. 3

L 4-4 The house retains considerable original and early heritage fabric including massing, fenestration, unpainted hard-pressed Brampton red brick cladding and squared brick verandah columns, stone lintels and sills. The property is distinguished by the unusual and whimsical miniature castle garden structure located along the rear, east side of the property facing Lowes Avenue. In 1961, property owner Joseph (Jozeps) Kodors built the castle as the focal point of a colourful enchanted garden. It was built to amuse his family and the neighborhood children. It features copper capped towers, field stone walls, a variety of windows and dormers, wood shingles, finials and a bell tower. A concrete date stone displaying 1961 is visible on the front façade of the feature. This structure is presumably a oneof-a kind in Brampton. It is well-known in the neighbourhood and remains a popular attraction. Historical/Associative Value The property is situated in the heart of one of Brampton s downtown residential plans of subdivision known as the Rosedale Plan or the D-12 plan of subdivision. Title search data suggests that the subject house was built around 1924 when the Craftsman style of architecture was still popular albeit less so than the previous decade. The subject property is associated initially with James S. Knapman, the first registered owner of the lot. He purchased the property in 1920 for $700 and sold it in October 1923 to George Burrows, presumably with the subject house completed since the assessed value of the property had increased significantly to $6300. In December 1954, the property was purchased by the Kodors family. Joseph (Jozeps) Kodors (1915-2004) and his wife Waultraud (1925-2009) were Polish immigrants. Joseph Kodors worked for the Town of Brampton as a carpenter, and Waultraud worked at the local Dixie Cup factory. In 1961, Mr. Kodors built the miniature castle garden feature. According to the current owners, it is believed that the design is a fanciful representation of typical castles Mr. Kodors would have seen as in his native Poland, and not a scaled replica of a specific European castle. Contextual Value The cultural heritage value of the property is also linked to its contextual value. The property is physically and historically linked to its surroundings. It has helped define and maintain this well-established residential neighbourhood since the early 20th century. 4

L 4-5 The property contributes much to the prevailing character and identity of the Rosedale Plan, which is generally defined by a compatible blend of late 19th century and early to mid-20th century detached, single family homes on large, heavily treed lots. The house is a conspicuous and familiar building along the street, being on a corner lot. The miniature castle garden feature remains a highly visible and popular landmark piece that is evidently very well-known in the neighbourhood. The castle is also directly integrated and associated with the surrounding shade gardens and trees, helping to form what was believed to be an enchanted garden along the Lowes Avenue portion of the subject property. The property also helps interpret the residential growth and development that began to take shape during and after the First World War period. The gradual expansion of residential growth along the northern edges of the town commenced in this period as developers identified new growth areas outside the traditional built-up core that immediately surrounded Queen and Main Streets. When first built, the subject property was close to fringes of the urban boundary, already dominated by the Dale Estate greenhouse complexes, just north of Lorne Avenue and along the east side of nearby Main Street North. The landscape elements on the grounds contribute to the character of the house and neighbourhood and they include the lawns, mature trees and flower beds along Lowes Avenue. 4. Description of Heritage Attributes Unless otherwise indicated, the reason for designation apply generally to all exterior elevations, facades, foundation, roof and roof trim, all doors, windows, other structural openings and associated trim, all architectural detailing, construction materials of wood, stone, brick, plaster parging, metal and glazing and related building techniques, fencing, all trees, shrubs, hedgerows, other vegetation and the grounds and vistas generally. To ensure that the cultural heritage value of this property is conserved, certain heritage attributes that contribute to its value have been identified specifically and they include: Scale, form and massing of a typical one-and-a half storey, side gabled American Craftsman style bungalow; Prominent front gabled dormer widow Edwardian Classicism influences exhibited in stone lintels, sills, open front verandah with squared brick columns and rusticated stone foundation; Exterior, unpainted brick masonry; All existing windows, doors and structural openings, along with associated trim; Existing leaded, stained glass windows; Unique miniature castle garden structure facing Lowes Avenue Relationship between miniature castle garden structure and surrounding planting beds and trees along Lowes Avenue portion of the lot which contributes to what 5

L 4-6 remains of the original shaded enchanted garden designed by the Kodors family 5. Alteration History and Heritage Integrity 5.1 Alteration History The property has a new detached garage that contributes to the prevailing character of the property as a whole. The front verandah has a new, wood balustrade railing that is not compatible, but also a wood lattice apron around the base of the verandah that is in keeping with the period of construction. Most windows have been replaced but do not detract from the heritage fabric. New historically compatible wood shingles clad the dormer and side gables. 5.2 Recommended Restoration Measures None. 6. Archaeological Potential The subject property has no known archaeological value. 7. Policy Framework In the context of land use planning, the Province of Ontario has declared that the wise use and management of Ontario s cultural heritage resources is a key provincial interest. A set of Provincial Policy Statements (PPS) provides planning policy direction on matters of provincial interest in Ontario. These statements set the policy framework for regulating the development and use of land. The current set of policies was last reviewed in 2005. At that time, the cultural heritage policies were strengthened considerably. The relevant heritage policy statement is PPS 2.6.1, which states that significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. PPS 2.6.1 is tied to Section 3 of the Ontario Planning Act which stipulates that land use planning decisions by municipalities shall be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statements. The policy is also integrated with the Ontario Heritage Act. This piece of legislation grants municipalities powers to preserve locally significant cultural heritage resources through heritage designation. Decisions as to whether a property should be designated heritage or not is based solely on its inherent cultural heritage value or interest. 6

L 4-7 City Council prefers to designate heritage properties with the support of property owners. However, Council will designate a property proactively, without the concurrence of a property owner as required. These principles are reflected in Brampton s Official Plan. The relevant policies are as follows: 4.9.1.3: All significant heritage resources shall be designated as being of cultural heritage value or interest in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act to help ensure effective protection and their continuing maintenance, conservation and restoration. 4.9.1.5: Priority will be given to designating all heritage cemeteries and all Class A heritage resources in the Cultural Heritage Resources Register under the Ontario Heritage Act. 4.9.1.6: The City will give immediate consideration to the designation of any heritage resource under the Ontario Heritage Act if that resource is threatened with demolition, significant alterations or other potentially adverse impacts. These principles are also guided by recognized best practices in the field of heritage conservation. 8. Acknowledgments 7

L 4-8 9. Appendix Figure 1: Aerial map of 35 Rosedale Avenue West 8

L 4-9 Figure 2: Front façade with a prominent front gabled dormer widow, and full-length open verandah with squared brick columns Figure 3: View from to corner of Rosedale and Lowes Avenues 9

L 4-10 Figure 4: Leaded, stained glass windows with stone lintel and sill Figure 5: Rusticated stone foundation 10

L 4-11 Figure 6: View of property from Lowes Ave, including miniature castle and surrounding gardens Figure 7: Miniature castle with copper capped towers, field stone walls, a variety of windows and dormers, wood shingles, finials and a bell tower 11

L 4-12 Figure 8: Date stone on the miniature castle reading 1961. Figure 9: The miniature castle surrounded by plantings helped created an enchanted garden. 12

L 4-13 Figure 10: Miniature castle viewed from Rosedale Avenue West 13