Rod String Design Software Simulation of Sandia Downhole Load Cell Wells

Similar documents
Update on Sandia Downhole Dynamometer Testing

Quick Rod (QROD) String Design Tools

Pumping Unit Gear Reducer Failures

Design Your Rod String to Unseat the Pump But NOT Overload the System

Steel Sucker Rod Fatigue Testing Update on Phase I

System Design & Diagnostic Analysis of Group 2 Systems

Horizontal Well Downhole Dynamometer Data Acquisition

Recording Dynagraph on Bent / Misaligned Polished rod.

Validating Vertical-Hole Diagnostic Models with Measured Sandia Data

Downhole Dynamometer Card Validation Method

11 th Annual Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Renaissance Hotel Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 15-18, 2015

Modified Everitt-Jennings (MEJ) Method and the Gibbs Method: Downhole Card Comparison

Runtimes for Deviated Rod Pump Wells in the Fruitland Coal Formation

Experience Rod Pumping Deviated CBM Wells

Partial History of the Industry

Complete Stress Analysis of Sucker- Rod Pumping Installations

Sucker Rod System Analyst

A Case for Developing a Wear Model for Sucker Rod System Design

Design of Sucker Rod Systems

Sucker Rod Pump Handling and Rig Crew Safety

Double String Pumping Systems *Patent Pending Dennis R. Wilson, Advisor, Artificial Lift Engineering ConocoPhillips, Lower 48, San Juan Business Unit

Hollow Sucker Rods: Development and applications in Beam Pumping

Improving the Reliability & Maintenance Costs of Hydraulically Actuated Sucker Rod Pumping Systems

Development of a High Pressure Gas Gun for H 2 S and CO 2 Service

Interactive 3D Wellbore Viewer

The Horizontal Rod Pumped Well s Ultimate Production System

Pump Stroke Optimization: A Better Way

Ventura Field Rod Well Systems

Casing Gas Separator: A New Gas Separation Technology

Comparing & Validating Deviation Surveys

Horizontal Well Downhole Dynamometer Data Acquisition: Prototype is ready!

Enhance Plunger Lift While Reducing CAPEX and OPEX

A New Sucker Rod Coupling Material: An Economical Solution for Downhole Wear in Deviated Unconventional Wells

Mitigate slug flow to increase the maximum rod pumping rate and allow earlier transition to rod pumping

Better Design and Control of Deviated and Horizontal Wells: HWDDDA

UNDERSTANDING, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF & EFFICIENTLY MITIGATING DOWNHOLE FAILURES

Understanding Hazardous Locations Concepts

Regulatory Roundup and Automation Scott Jackson Regional Sales Manager Mid Continent OleumTechitle

x27 DSP SRP Application Sucker Rod Pump Software. SRP Dynacard Troubleshooting

The Lowest OPEX Producer Wins the Production Game

Unico SRP Downhole Protection VSD System

Tom Miesner Principal Pipeline Knowledge & Development

p?:uam SYSTEMS Technical Progress Report Jane H. Davidson NAllJRAL CONVECTION HEAT EXCHANGERS FOR SOLAR WATER HEATING February 1,1996 to March 31,1996

NATURAL CONVECTION HEAT EXCHANGERS FOR SOLAR WATER HEATING SYSTEMS. Technical Progress Report April 1,1995 to May 31,1995

Embedded Linux with VAR-SOM-MX6 Course

Title Page. Report Title: Downhole Power Generation and Wireless Communications. for Intelligent Completions Applications

ADT Security Website Terms of Use

Experion LX Direct Station Specification

REAL-TIME SOFTWARE TO ESTIMATE FRICTION COEFFICIENT AND DOWNHOLE WEIGHT ON BIT DURING DRILLING OF HORIZONTAL WELLS

19 mm Series Low Cost, Stainless Steel, Isolated Pressure Sensors

Analysis of Eccentric Wear of Sucker Rod and Design of Multi-Stage Flexibility Stabilizer

Energy Efficiency Business Rebates Natural Gas Catalog

19 mm Series. Pressure Sensors Low-Cost, Stainless Steel, Isolated Sensors WARNING WARNING. Sensing and Control

Samsung SDS BMS Ver.2.0. Technical Specification

A Cost Effective Multi-Spectral Scanner for Natural Gas Detection

THERMAL VACUUM TESTS OF A FIVE WATT PSEUDO CHIP SEM-X ELECTRONIC MODULE CLAMPED IN A SATELLITE BOX

SN5446A, 47A, 48, SN54LS47, LS48, LS49 SN7446A, 47A, 48, SN74LS47, LS48, LS49 BCD-TO-SEVEN-SEGMENT DECODERS/DRIVERS

Alternative Crop Suitability Methodology

Emerging Technology Program

ICONE DRAFT Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering ICONE16 May 11-15, 2008, Orlando, Florida, USA

Principles of Cold Insulation

CO2 Sensor User and Installation Guide

Life-Cycle Energy Costs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Gas Turbine Power

GLOW WIRE TESTING FOR THE APPLIANCE INDUSTRY

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Model OP155 Air Dryer

Electronic Refrigerant Leak Detector DE-FG36-98G Micronic, Inc. Elie Talamas, Jr. Period: 10/1/99 to 12/31/99

Catalog. Self-operated Regulators Volume 2 Temperature Regulators

Zenith E-Series ESP gauges

Model Number Structure

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Testing of valves Fire type-testing requirements. Essais des appareils de robinetterie Exigences de l'essai au feu

ISO 2896 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Rigid cellular plastics Determination of water absorption

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Graphical symbols Safety colours and safety signs Part 2: Design principles for product safety labels

ORIGA-SENSOFLEX Displacement Measuring System for Cylinder Series OSP-P

ISO/TR TECHNICAL REPORT. Reaction-to-fire tests Full-scale room tests for surface products Part 2: Technical background and guidance

PlateScrape Plate Pre-Scrapper Test Report

SACKSAFOAM QUICK FILL OPERATIONS MANUAL 2019A

AVIATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES: PIPELINE LEAK DETECTION

CD6102 / CD6102 OC / CD6102-2

New and Unusual Applications for Plunger Lift System

Measurement of Attic Temperatures and Cooling Energy Use in Vented and Sealed Attics in Las Vegas, Nevada

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Safety identification Escape and evacuation plan signs. Identification de sécurité Plans d'évacuation et de secours

E Programmble Smoke Detector Controller. Figure 1. Programmable Smoke Detector Kit

Vertical Uplift Load-Displacement Relationship of Horizontal Anchors in Sand

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Coating powders Part 13: Particle size analysis by laser diffraction

1/24/01 SYLVANIA Process Heat FOR SAFETY AND LONG HEATER LIFE, CAREFULLY READ THIS MANUAL BEFORE USE.

LED HYBRID PATHWAY LIGHTING for The National Park Service

Falcon-II Next Generation, Air Quality Monitor CO2 & Temperature

NEMA Standards Publication ICS (R 2007) Adjustable Speed Electrical Power Drive Systems

CONVECTION OVENS FOR FOOD SERVICE APPLICATIONS BLODGETT SHO-E

Conceptual Design of a Better Heat Pump Compressor for Northern Climates

Seyedeh Sepideh Ghaffari 1 & Seyed Ali Jazayeri 2

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. Leak Detection in MDPE Gas Pipeline using Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet Transform

State-of-the-art Developments to Save Energy in Coating Drying

The green and friendly entrance. Comfort air curtains Model CA 2

J. LINES, Graham Corp., Batavia, New York

Acoustically Determining Plungers Fall Velocity For Different Type Plungers

GLOW WIRE TESTING FOR THE APPLIANCE INDUSTRY

Hot Food Holding Cabinets Test for FWE HLC

INSTALLATION AND OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE VEHICLE-MOUNTED RADIATION DETECTION SYSTEM

Transcription:

10 th Annual Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Renaissance Hotel Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 16-19, 2014 Rod String Design Software Simulation of Sandia Downhole Load Cell Wells by Norman W. Hein, Jr., P.E. Norris/AOT & DAL Lynn Rowlan Echometer Scott Malone Norris DAL

Content Background & prior software simulation comparison Sandia well & operating information Rod string software & results Comparison with actual loads Summary & Conclusions Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 2

Background A Current Comparison of Sucker Rod String Design Programs By Norman W. Hein, Jr., P.E. Oil & Gas Optimization Specialists, Ltd. & Russell Stevens, Norris Paper #7 - Presented at Southwestern Petroleum Short Course (SWPSC), April 21/22, 2004 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 3

Purpose Compared predictive steel, vertical rod string design results to actual dynamometer cards using: Q Rod Rod Star S Rod Lufkin LoadCalB (API) Conoco Modified API (no sinker bars) Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 4

Accuracy Fig. 5. Well #1 Accuracy Comparison 120.00% 110.00% 100.00% 90.00% 80.00% Wrf =SVL (lb) TVL (lb) PPRL (lb) MPRL (lb) Max Rod Stress... Diff. A Diff. B Diff. C Diff D Diff. E Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 5

Accuracy Fig. 8. Well #3b Accuracy Comparison 250.00% 200.00% 150.00% 100.00% 50.00% 0.00% Diff. A Diff. B Diff. C Diff. D Diff. E Wrf =SVL (lb) TVL (lb) PPRL (lb) MPRL (lb) Max Rod Stress (psi) Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 6

Results Comparison showed not all the required loads and nondimensional operating parameters that are required for optimization and troubleshooting were provided by all the programs Inaccuracies may be within 10 to 15% for simple string When sinker bars installed and comparison made, inaccuracies may be from -40% to +25% of actual measurements Maintained belief that programs cannot accurately predict dynamic effects of sinker bars Some programs were changed over time plus new capabilities of designing effect of well bore deviations included Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 7

Sandia well & operating data Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 8

Well No. Depth Casing Tubing Seat Nipple TAC Depth Rod No. Coupling Guides PBD (ft) (in) (in) Depth (ft) (ft) & grade Size Installed 1 2780 5.5 2.875 2710 2647 66/C FS 2/rod 2 7799 7 2.875 7655 6168 1.25" FRP to 4362'; 1.0" D to 7564' 3 9270 5.5 2.875 9220 8968 87/D w 408' 1.0" D SB 4 3090 5.5 2.875 3061 3058 76/D w 300' 1.25" SB 5a 5278 5.5 2.875 5060 4970 86/D w 250' 1.5" SB 5b 5278 5.5 2.875 5060 4970 86/D w 250' 1.5" SB 6 2975 5.5 2.875 2909 2603 77/N-97 w 500' 1.5" SB SHSM - FRP; FSSM - D SHSM - 1"; FSSM 7/8" Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 9 0 0 FS 0 SH - 1"; FS - rest SH - 1"; FS - rest 2/rod on 3/4" 2/rod on 3/4" FSSM 0

Well No. 1 Pump Dia Pump Length Unit Size Motor Tubing Casing Produced Fluid (in) (Ft) (HP) Pressure (psi) Press (psi) G 1.5 12 228-213-86 20 60 0 0.995 2 1.5 30 M640-305-144 75 45 76 1.027 3 2.25 35 Rotoflex 1100-500-306 100 40 40 1.019 4 1.5 26 M640-305-168 40 20 0 1 5a 2 24 M640-305-168 60 205 180 0.982 5b 2 24 M640-305-168 60 205 180 0.982 6 2.25 24 456-305-144 72 43 vacuum 1.015 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 10

Well No. 1 2 3 4 5a 5b 6 N S Fluid Level Tool (spm) (in) FAP (ft) Depths (ft) 11 86 2710 #1- below pump - Not Work (NW); #2 - above pump @2689'; #3-2462' (in 3/4"); #4-1010' (in 3/4"); #5 - Below PR @2' 8.2 144 428' #1 - below pump; #2 - above pump @7566'; #3-7489' (75' above pump) - NW; #4-4362' (FG to Stl x); #5-4285' (75' above x) 3.9 306 86 #1 - above pump 9229'; #2-9087' (in 1" SB); #3-8785' (in 1" SB); #4-7658' (SB to 7 x); #5-7506' (in 7/8") 4.58 168 243 #1 - below pump; #2 - above pump @3010'; #3-2708' (SB to 6 x); #4-1006' (6 to 7 x); #5 - below PR @2' 9.1 168 4767 #1 - below pump; #2 - above pump @4993'; #3-4741' (SB to 7 x); #4-4714' (25' above x); #5 - below PR @2' 6.5 168 4767 #1 - below pump; #2 - above pump @4993'; #3-4741' (SB to 6 x); #4-3114' (6 to 7 x); #5-1512 (7 to 8 x) 7.1 143.5 1054 #1 - below pump; #2 - above pump @2860'; #3-2783' (in SB); Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; #4-2356' DAL/NWH (SB to 7 x); 11 #5 - below PR @2'

Rod Design Software Evaluated Programs considered: QRod RodStar Srod Program defaults used Assumption for pump/plunger friction = -200 pounds While some wells reported with guides, deviation surveys not available so assumption all wells vertical Assumed friction coefficient = 0.2 no guides; 0.3 w/guides One program did not have the Rotoflex geometry in analysis capabilities; so CW Conventional unit used Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 12

Sandia load translation using DHLC Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 13

SANDIA Test AHC SSAU 4115 08/04/96 10:00 AM Sept. 17-20, 2014 14

From L. Rowlan: Update on Sandia Downhole Dynamometer Testing, SRL WS, OKC, 09/18/2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 15

Well 1 Sept. 17-20, 2014 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 16

Well 2 Sept. 17-20, 2014 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 17

Well 3 Sept. 17-20, 2014 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 18

Well 4 Sept. 17-20, 2014 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 19

Well 5A Sept. 17-20, 2014 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 20

Well 6 Sept. 17-20, 2014 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 21

Summary Programs versus actual load Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 22

Tabular Comparison Well 1 Load Sandia Prog 1 % Prog 2 % Prog 3 % PPRL 8815 8661-1.7 8746-0.7 8736-0.9 MPRL 1979 1600-19.1 1797-9.2 2167-0.9 MPL -58-744 +138 0 1-200 +245 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 23

Tabular Comparison Well 2 Load Sandia Prog 1 % Prog 2 % Prog 3 % PPRL 18.613 21,221 +14 20,484 +10.0 20,669 -+11.0 MPRL 5932 6074 +2.4 6224 +4.9 5547-6.5 MPL +217-2838 -1208 0 1-200 -7.8 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 24

Tabular Comparison Well 3 Load Sandia Prog 1 % Prog 2 % Prog 3 % PPRL 39,972 52,459 +31.2 42,639 +10.6 40,799 +2.1 MPRL 16.148 21,457 +32.9 14,134-11.5 14298-11.5 MPL +230-3367 -2710 0 1-200 -13.2 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 25

Tabular Comparison Well 4 Load Sandia Prog 1 % Prog 2 % Prog 3 % PPRL 8,656 8.946 +3.3 10,280 +18.7 8,462-2.2 MPRL 1,977 3,673 +85.8 2,201 +11.3 2,470 +24.9 MPL -93-2,613-2710 0 1-200 +115 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 26

Tabular Comparison Well 5A Load Sandia Prog 1 % Prog 2 % Prog 3 % PPRL 15,507 16,389 +5.68 15,701 +1.25 16.926 +9.1 MPRL 6651 7161 +7.7 7054 +6.1 6980 +4.9 MPL -34-4403 -4502 0 1-254 -647 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 27

Tabular Comparison Well 6 Load Sandia Prog 1 % Prog 2 % Prog 3 % PPRL 13,344 15,276 14.5 12,743-4.5 10,582-20.7 MPRL 7040 4485-36.3 4295-39.9 2793-60.3 MPL +804-2788 -2467 0 1-200 -75.1 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 28

Conclusions & Recommendations Currently program 2 &3 are very close to the same accuracy Program 3 had a consistent -200 pound minimum pump load (MPL) which was related to the 200 pound of assumed pump friction If this friction was removed, then MPL would be very close Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 29

Conclusions & Recommendations - cont Prog 1 had consistently the worse accuracy and dramatically over-estimated MPL Prog 1 & 3 have provided all the load and nondimensional pumping parameters while prog 2 still is missing N/No While there were instances where there was a negative MPL, these loads did not increase nor stay applied over the plunger stroke length Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 30

Copyright Rights to this presentation are owned by the company(ies) and/or author(s) listed on the title page. By submitting this presentation to the Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop, they grant to the Workshop, the Artificial Lift Research and Development Council (ALRDC), and the Southwestern Petroleum Short Course (SWPSC), rights to: Display the presentation at the Workshop. Place it on the www.alrdc.com web site, with access to the site to be as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee. Place it on a CD for distribution and/or sale as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee. Other use of this presentation is prohibited without the expressed written permission of the author(s). The owner company(ies) and/or author(s) may publish this material in other journals or magazines if they refer to the Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop where it was first presented. Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 31

Disclaimer The following disclaimer shall be included as the last page of a Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Course. A similar disclaimer is included on the front page of the Sucker Rod Pumping Web Site. The Artificial Lift Research and Development Council and its officers and trustees, and the Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Steering Committee members, and their supporting organizations and companies (here-in-after referred to as the Sponsoring Organizations), and the author(s) of this Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Training Course and their company(ies), provide this presentation and/or training material at the Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop "as is" without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the information or the products or services referred to by any presenter (in so far as such warranties may be excluded under any relevant law) and these members and their companies will not be liable for unlawful actions and any losses or damage that may result from use of any presentation as a consequence of any inaccuracies in, or any omission from, the information which therein may be contained. The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in these presentations and/or training materials are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Sponsoring Organizations. The author is solely responsible for the content of the materials. The Sponsoring Organizations cannot and do not warrant the accuracy of these documents beyond the source documents, although we do make every attempt to work from authoritative sources. The Sponsoring Organizations provide these presentations and/or training materials as a service. The Sponsoring Organizations make no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the presentations and/or training materials, or any part thereof, including any warrantees of title, noninfringement of copyright or patent rights of others, merchantability, or fitness or suitability for any purpose. Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 32

Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop; DAL/NWH 33