Shoreline Plan Briefing

Similar documents
Area Plans. September 18, 2012

Support the implementation of Cape Coral's Comprehensive Plan. Protect and utilize the unique natural resources in the City.

Attachment 4. TRPA Environmental Documentation, IEC/MFONSE

St. Croix County Shoreland Overlay Zoning Districts. Public Hearing Community Development Committee December 19, 2013

India Basin/Hunters Point Shoreline Community Workshop May 21, 2008

Preserving Recreational & Commercial Working Waterfronts. Jennifer Z. Carver, AICP August 2007

Provide and maintain sufficient public parks, recreation facilities, and open space to meet the recreational needs of County residents and visitors.

Planning Charlotte s Future. Planning Committee May 17, 2016

Steering Committee Meeting

ORDINANCE NO. City of Bellingham City Attorney 210 Lottie Street Bellingham, Washington INFILL HOUSING ORDINANCE Page 1

Town of Brookfield Master Plan Implementation Matrix Action

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

NOTICE OF PREPARATION and ANNOUNCEMENT OF SCOPING MEETINGS

East Shore Planning Group P. O. Box 827 Marshall, CA (415)

Community Design. Our Use of Land. Introduction

Planning Charlotte s Future. Transportation & Planning Committee March 14, 2016

San Jose. Memorandum. s lulls, FROM: Kim Walesh Rosalynn Hughey TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN VISION

Ashbridges Bay Erosion and Sediment Control Project

In surveys, Dallas residents say what they want to change most

SOUTH LAKE TAHOE LINEAR PARK LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS

Questions for Carlsbad City Council Members and Candidates (July 1, 2016)

Stevens County Partnership Shoreline Master Program Update

Preliminary Regulatory and Engineering

PLANNING IN ARLINGTON. Briefing to Katie Cristol

TAHOE CITY VISION PLAN June 2012

Summary Community Workshop #1 Fruitvale San Antonio Senior Center Monday, March 23, :00-9:00 p.m.

Hamilton Pier 7&8 Public Meeting and Workshop #1

RESEDA - WEST VAN NUYS COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE WORKSHOP

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

3.9 SCENIC RESOURCES INTRODUCTION REGULATORY BACKGROUND TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD CARRYING CAPACITIES

ARLINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN CHAIR GUIDE

Chapter 3. Community Vision and Goals

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

Village of Fair Haven Goals & Objectives

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLACERVILLE OFFICE:

Whitemarsh Comprehensive Plan Update: Housing & Land Use. Public Workshop #3: September 20, 2018

Preservation of Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfronts

Cohasset Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting #1. Harriman GEI Consultants FXM Associates May 31, 2018

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

1INTRODUCTION. Purpose of the Truckee Railyard Master Plan

Fair Oaks Ranch Homeowners Association Parks and Trails Master Plan & 2019 Budget Planning

EL DORADO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT PRINCIPLE INTRODUCTION STATE AUTHORIZATION

Slot Home Task Force Meeting #5 Phase 2 June 8, 2017

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

MUNICIPAL RESILIENCE PLANNING ASSISTANCE PROJECT

I. STAFF POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS. The following RMP policy strategies are proposed by staff in support of a Scenic Resource Protection Program:

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

5.4 Development Incentives for All Commercial and Industrial Districts (except the TC: Town Center District).

Rogue River Recreation and Access Management Plan- Table Rocks Reach. Jackson County, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, National Park Service

Introduction and Overview

ROCKAWAY BOARDWALK Community Board 14 Parks Committee Meeting June 4, 2014

1. Executive Summary. SECTION 1 Executive Summary. City of Arlington Lake Arlington Master Plan

THAT the attached Terms of Reference for the Thornhill Centre Street Study be approved.

36.1. PURPOSE APPLICABILITY DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES

DISCUSSION TOPIC: ST JOHNS RIVER & ITS TRIBUTARIES (BPII) 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

TASK FORCE MEETING #10 SUMMARY

Workshop #3 June 13, 2016


Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report and Public Scoping Meeting for the Alameda Shipways Residential Project

Agenda. 3. Outstanding Items. How it would work (DRP) Urban Design Guidelines language in Sector Plan (Concepts) vs. Guidelines Document (Detail)

Nick Sigmund, Sr. Zoning Officer

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

{Best Practices. Summary of Tools, Strategies and Best Practices from 11 Michigan Case Study Communities

Sea Level Rise Workshop #4 May 22, 2018 Venice Local Coastal Program SUMMARY

East Central Area Plan

Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Dawn Kamalanathan, Director, Planning and Capital Projects

Exhibit A. 8:9 Scuffletown Rural Conservation District

FORMAT FOR THE SUBMISSION OF STATE OF CONSERVATION REPORTS BY THE STATES PARTIES (in compliance with Paragraph 169 of the Operational Guidelines)

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

LU Encourage schools, institutions, and other community facilities that serve rural residents to locate in neighboring cities and towns.

RESOLUTION NUMBER RESOLUTION SETTING SERVICE FEES FOR OF FIRE & LIFE SAFETY ACTIVITIES.

Planning Commission March 14, Presented by: City of Bellingham Port of Bellingham

Beatties Ford Road & Mt. Holly-Huntersville Road Small Area Plan

CHAPTER 7: ELEMENT F. - SCHEDULE

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

18 May 2016 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Water Efficiency Ordinance ZCA No El Monte City Council June 7, 2016

D2 Subway Project Development. Stakeholder Committee October 24, 2018

Baumgarten MPUD. Exhibit 3 Evaluation Criteria

Route 1 Corridor Study

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

Public/Quasi-Public Facilities and Services Element INTRODUCTION

State Parks and Wildlife Conservation Trust Fund Act

TREASURE ISLAND PHASE ONE PROJECTS PUBLIC ART PROJECT OUTLINE

SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN. Planning Commission Study Session August 18, 2016

Workshop Summary: Neighborhood Character

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

It Takes A Village.. Preserving Rural Character In Standish

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

CHAPTER 13 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

MEMO 1. INTRODUCTION PURPOSE & PROCESS REQUEST

Port of Camas-Washougal Waterfront Trail Master Plan

Today s Agenda. Introduction to Camiros. Introduction to Zoning. Overview of Project Process Current understandings What we ve heard so far

MARINA MARKET & WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT STUDY PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS

Transcription:

Shoreline Plan Briefing Tahoe Lakefront Owners Association June 2, 2017 Working to Enhance + Protect 72 Miles of Lake Tahoe s Shoreline

Agenda Welcome Goals of Session Overview of Lake Tahoe Shoreline Plan So Far Overview of Input Process Stations: Pick 3 to go to every 15 min

Shoreline Stakeholders Community Joint Fact Finding Committee Staff Developing CONSENSUS Recommendations Shoreline Steering Committee Policy Makers Community Workshop Series TODAY Input

Plan Timeline + Process Winter 2016 Planning + Outreach + Data Collection Fall 2016 Winter 2017 Environmental Review Winter 2018 Assessment + Design Spring-Summer 2016 Community Workshops + Planning Summer 2017 TRPA Adoption

Overarching Goal Enhance the recreational experience along Lake Tahoe s shores while protecting the environment and responsibly planning for the future.

Plan Scope Focus on Water Dependent Structures - Ramps - Piers - Buoys - Marinas Low Lake Level Adaptation Permit Streamlining Environmental Thresholds D.L. Bliss

Organizing Principles Create a Fair and Equal System of Access Protect and Enhance the Environment Preserve Quality Recreation and Public Safety on Lake Tahoe Adapt to Changing Lake Levels Implement Predictable + Consistent Rules

Moorings 3 Types Slips Buoys Boat Lifts/Hoists Tahoe City Marina

Buoys Design & Location Single-Use 20 setback change from 25 in prior ordinance Allowance for a deeper water anchor for adaptation during low-lake conditions Location may be up to 600 waterward from elevation 6,220 Setback at least 50 from other buoys In coves or other areas with navigational challenges, TRPA may adjust projection lines on a case-bycase basis but other standards apply Multiple-Use (Buoys Fields) Buoy fields must be in a grid system with same setback and spacing standards as single-uses and structures, but may deviate based on site specific conditions and neighboring uses An additional permanent lakeward row for anchors allowed for low-lake adaptation HOA moorings cannot exceed the total number of units/members

Mooring - Caps 6,316 Total Cap 1,430 Additional Moorings Available 800 of 1430 Initial Release 630 of 1430 Reserve Pool (for Public Agencies + Marinas + Others in Future) 330 of 630 Reserve Pool for Marinas Adaptive Management - Every 5 years revisit Reserve Pool Note: - Under the 2008 Shz Ordinance, TRPA received applications for 4,412 buoys (3,421 were approved with another 981 pending) - During the 2016 Buoy Survey, 4,886 buoys were counted on Lake Tahoe (1,188 in NV & 3,698 in CA)

Mooring Allocations Grandfathering - May continue to keep all legal moorings (including 3 buoys on some parcels) - May wish to modify permit to take advantage of new rules, such as setbacks & low lake adaptation New Moorings Up to 2 moorings per littoral parcel at any one time

Permitting & Allocation of New Buoys First Call Invite all TRPA permittees, approved and pending, to reactivate and/or modify their permits, and reconcile any outstanding permit conditions Second Call An initial 800 new buoys will be allocated Residential owners will be allowed to apply for up to 2 moorings HOAs: only eligible for up to 20% increase in first 5 years. Existing buoys greater than 50% of residential units then not eligible Commercial and Tourist Accommodation buoys will be reviewed under HOA rules Permit Fees - TBD

Buoy Enforcement Nevada TRPA, NDSL, & NDOW conducting buoy enforcement pursuant to an existing MOU California TRPA & CSLC working on an MOU to clarify buoy enforcement procedures

Piers

Piers 3 Types Private Single-Use Serving one residential lakefront parcel Private Multiple-Use Serving 2 or more residential lakefront parcels Homeowner or condo association Commercial Hotel/Motel Public Use Open or available for use by the general public, including marinas or public lands Existing Littoral parcels = 1,572 (1,412 private & 160 public) Piers = 771 (673 private, 42 public, & 56 quasi-public) Pierless parcels = 787 private & 129 public

Piers Principles Go slow Prioritize Multiple-Use and/or Retirement of Pier Development Potential Pier Allocation 10 Public Piers and 128 Private Piers (total) Available for Permitting Initial Release Of the 128 private piers, 96 will be released for the first 16 years of the program, 32 will be held in reserve Up to 6 piers per year will be allocated, and 2 years of allocations will be released every 2 years. Application will be evaluated on: The number of parcels being served or retired Scenic Shoreline Character Type If the parcel is already part of a joint or multiple-use pier, or is otherwise deed restricted from pier development

Existing Piers & Boathouses Maintenance, Repair, & Reconstruction Streamlined permitting for as-is, where-is, no changes Modification Proposed project improves conformity to the location and design standards; Results in a material environmental improvement; and Does not increase non-conformity Transfers Piers may be transferred to other parcels within the same scenic unit, or to a unit in attainment, but not to another unit not in attainment. Expansion Must comply with location & design standards Except Boathouses: The expansion does not increase the functional capacity of the pier; The effect of the expansion is to increase the scenic rating of the structure; and The expansion is the minimum necessary to accomplish the scenic quality improvement Scenic Credit If shorezone structures are removed, the visual mass, or scenic credits, may be banked for future use or mitigation.

Scenic Threshold Shoreline Scenic Status Scenic Units 33 Scenic Shoreline Units 22 in attainment 11 in non-attainment Majority of pier development occurs in nonattainment units

Scenic Shoreline Character Types Visually Modified Visually Sensitive

Piers Design & Location Standards Multiple-Use Incentives First priority for processing Design features allowed to encourage Longer Catwalks Boatlifts (1/parcel, up to 4 allowed) Creative Pierhead Design Design Standards for Single-Use & Multiple-Use Length Width Catwalks Boatlifts Visual Mass

Single-Use Pier

Multiple-Use Pier

Pier Policy Proposals Mitigation For single-use pier one option is to retire pier development elsewhere within the Scenic Unit. Additional considerations would be to join with neighbors to exercise multiple-use for a common pier service multiple residences. The actual visual mass square footage of the pier would be mitigated based on Scenic Shoreline Character Type: Other policy issues under consideration: Private pier density HOA service - Visually Modified - 1:2.0 - Visually Sensitive - 1:3.0

Conceptual Plan Distribution of 128 new private piers around Lake Tahoe a. 86 in California (2/3) i. 58 of the 86 in Placer Quadrant (2/3) ii. 28 of the 86 in El Dorado Quadrant (1/3) b. 42 in Nevada (1/3) i. 21 of the 42 in Washoe Quadrant (1/2) ii. 21 of the 42 in Douglas/Carson Quadrant (1/2)

ShorelinePlan.org SHORELINE PLAN 2017

Breakout Directions 4 topics Pick 3 15 minutes each Bell will indicated time to change Each station: recorder, facilitator Stay after in have more questions!