Similar documents
iii. Visioning framework

CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Transportation Element Focus Group Meeting #3

This is the East Carolina University Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Final Draft Plan Review. This workbook reviews the campus draft master plan

New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario

CAL POLY MASTER PLAN UPDATE, March 2015

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

Neighborhood Districts

U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u t h C a r o l i n a A i k e n. Land Plan Study

University of Minnesota. MINNEAPOLIS CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK February 11, 2016

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

UCSF Parnassus Heights Re-Envisioning Process

University of the District of Columbia Van Ness Campus Master Plan Community Open House 3. December 8, 2010

C. Westerly Creek Village & The Montview Corridor

Phase 1 : Understanding the Campus Context. Phase 2 : APPROACHES - Alternates & Preferred Plan

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

Figure 3-1: Public Realm Plan

Welcome. Community Consultation Meeting November 28, Review and discuss the Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Plan Framework

Preci nct P l ans Figure 56 Campus Aerial Photo, 2008 CAL STATE EAST BAY, HAYWARD CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

Existing Conditions. Planning and Design Principles

THE 355/270 CORRIDOR:

12 February CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Wayfinding & Signage

LOS ANGELES MISSION COLLEGE MASTER PLAN Master Plan DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES

V. Gateways GATEWAYS / V-1

St. Louis Park Wooddale LRT Station Site development guidelines

4- PA - LD - LIVELY DOWNTOWN. LD - Background

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE

THE LANDMARK PROJECT: ST. GEORGE CAMPUS BEFORE AND AFTER

264 neighborhoods NEIGHBORHOOD 6: WOODLAWN AND TENTH STREET

11 February CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Design Guidelines

K. SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED

01 the vision NEW LYNN IS WAITING FOR THE GREAT LEAP FORWARD

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Silverdale Regional Center

Transportation. Strategies for Action

Subcampus Recommendations

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Academics Efficient use of space will be used to enhance investments in new pedagogies such as active learning classrooms.

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

Table L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

10 February CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Focus Group - Landscape & Hensel Park

hermitage town center

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

Guiding Principles for the SR 520 Replacement Project

Garden edges provide vertical plantings to buffer the neighbors from the building facilities around the entire campus.

NEIGHBORHOOD 3: UNIVERSITY EDGE

EXISTING CONDITIONS 41. Existing Conditions

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

The University of Vermont #AMPUSª-ASTERª0LAN. & Design Guidelines. May 2006

18 May 2016 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE

A Vibrant Downtown. Chapter 5 Cary Public Art Opportunities 31

CONNECTING CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY

8.0 Built Form Framework

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

ANC 2A Presentation. November 9, 2006

Small Area Plan. South Gateway

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

University of Pennsylvania, Neural and Behavioral Sciences Building

City of Heath. Town Center Concept

NEIGHBORHOOD 7: FEE LANE AREA. Aerial View of Briscoe and McNutt Dormitories

University of Saskatchewan CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. Senate Meeting Preliminary Presentation. April 21, 2018 DIALOG ECS DA WATT

Plan Framework Report. Attachment A

Ivywild On The Creek PRELIMINARY CREEK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN

Wadsworth Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

Queensborough Eastern Neighbourhood Node. Community Open House

11.0 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

Colchester Northern Gateway Master Plan Vision Review Draft. July 2016

The following principles guide the development of goals and strategies to protect and promote these amenities:

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study. Courthouse Square Working Group #13 October 15, 2014

The transportation system in a community is an

CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

DRAFT ROOSEVELT ROAD. District Recommendations. Figure 5.23 The Roosevelt Road Corridor

GUIDELINES EXHIBITION PLACE LOCATION: OBJECTIVES. Structure Plan URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Hockessin Community Redevelopment Plan

1 Welcome! UBC Okanagan Master Plan Update - Open House

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

01 Welcome! About Ontario Shores

PROJECT NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION. Special Use Permit Modification Application

2.0 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE VISION

SECTION TWO: Urban Design Concepts

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

Regional Context Statement

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

Status Report: MD 355 Project

Albert Lea. Redevelopment Plan. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN Tel: (763) Fax: (763) wsbeng.

DRAFT Land Use Chapter

REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER

AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK

Sign System Recommendations

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

THEMES, VISION, + PRINCIPLES

section five BEAUTIFICATION PLAN

Transcription:

Health Sciences City The available land area, although limited, combined with the unique partnership between the primary institutions and the supporting partnerships of the development interests within the adjacent Bioscience Park and the City of Aurora, has presented the opportunity to create an integrated clinical, academic, research and professional community. To support the idea of Health Sciences City, a town center environment with a variety of commercial and residential uses was established at the heart of the site focusing on the existing historic Red Cross building and nearby post chapel, and extending to the historic Building 500, the former FAMC hospital, now an administrative center. Planning Guidelines Campus planning, landscape and architectural guidelines allow development to occur in a unified and ordered manner without sacrificing the opportunity for diversity in the buildings or exterior spaces. The architecture of the campus is largely organized to form strong, coherent edges to functional open spaces and streets - buildings are positioned, not as individual elements, but as elements that form a series of edges that reinforce the organization of open space and circulation. The philosophy of the Master Plan is based on the positioning of potential building sites around defined open spaces and inter-related pedestrian and vehicular corridors. A physical master plan created in 1998, has served to guide the development of the campus by providing a development framework within which to grasp the programmatic opportunities and potential of a new campus. Planning Process The framework of the master plan provides an ongoing structure of circulation for pedestrians, transit, and vehicular access and service to guide the campus development. These elements are contained within a framework of open spaces and circulation routes that define, and give access to, the major development areas. Individual projects apply the principles of planning and physical development to their specific site and the surrounding sites, both existing and future, to create a micromasterplan that ensures the optimum development pattern in the continuing evolution of a campus complex that reflects those fundamental guiding principles. Physical Development Individual projects ultimately determine the way the campus operates and develops and are of the utmost importance. Key considerations include: Building for the future Flexibility of Use Expandability and Adaptability Building to appropriate density appropriate to the idea that the available land is a finite quantity and that our development opportunities must be carefully preserved Economy of construction and operation and the incorporation of sustainable design principles to reduce short term impacts and long term costs Design that supports the idea of an inviting and welcoming campus environment, with sheltered, transparent building entrances and circulation spaces configurations that present a welcoming identity for the environment at nighttime and during the day. Creating and maintaining future opportunities for connectivity with pedestrian routes, shuttle circulators and bridges. Connections between buildings and functions are critical to the concept of campus integration, interdisciplinary work, and shared resources. These connections can take on a variety of forms from underground tunnels, open walkways at grade level, bridges, enclosed building sections, or a combination of these. In some cases, these connections may occur through buildings or structures. Developing working, learning and patient spaces to take advantage of natural light and views wherever possible, reducing lighting loads and contributing to individual orientation and comfort. Creating within the open space framework and architecture, variety in expression and character appropriate to individual uses - healing and restful environments, areas for collaboration and contemplation, as well as ceremonial spaces and places for gatherings and active play. Developing exterior spaces to accommodate an active, healthful lifestyle appropriate to a health sciences campus with areas of informal recreation, jogging and walking trails, bike and pedestrian routes. Minimizing the impact of the development on the natural environment by reducing and controlling storm runoff, maintaining efficient lighting levels and reducing light pollution, reducing vehicular traffic, and in general, designing structures and landscapes responsive to the unique nature of the Colorado environment. To ensure consistent development reflecting the highest quality in planning and design, the University Design Review Board conducts periodic reviews of projects being developed on the Anschutz Medical Campus. Similar development reviews occur within the surrounding development areas.

Planning and Design Principles The development framework and guidelines for planning and design reflect those over-arching principles and inform daily, short-term decisions with a long-range perspective. Create a Patient/Visitor friendly- welcoming and approachable campus. Provide connections to community amenities and resources, such as the adjacent Respect the landscape legacy of the site the concept of buildings in a park. open space of Sand Creek, as natural extensions of the open space of the campus. Respect the fact that the land is a finite resource use it efficiently. Promote interaction between the campus community and the surrounding Create a campus where buildings achieve a unified image beyond individual public/private communities. function. Incorporate a common palette of materials and elements of design that Build a system of efficient roadways including a ring road near the perimeter to are appropriate to Colorado and our unique climate. augment the system of surrounding arterial streets and highways minimize Maintain symbolic historic gateway from Colfax Avenue to Building 500. interior roadways to allow an efficient, connected, pedestrian core. Enhance image and identity of campus edge with a pattern of landscape elements Provide multiple points of vehicular entry to the campus to increase accessibility and features that create a memorable campus identity. for patients, faculty, staff, students and visitors, thereby reducing congestion and Provide flexibility for new opportunities; allow for building expansion and logical better accommodating the volume and variety of traffic generated by the academic new building sites. health center. Provide a land bank for future development opportunities and growth. Develop a multi-modal landscape and transit corridor along Montview Boulevard Create utility corridors that underlie major pedestrian and vehicular routes to that acts as a seam between the academic health sciences campus and the serve all areas of the campus. neighboring Bioscience Park. Program needs drive the physical development create a flexible, responsive Develop pathways and service connections linking the RTD light rail and bus development framework. transit stations to the activities of the campus. Define overall campus zones for research, education and clinical facilities that Utilize a system of perimeter parking structures and facilities to provide for an overlap to promote interdisciplinary development and activities, and sharing of efficient mode transition for visitors, patients, and employees. resources. Provide parking facilities near arrival points and treatment centers within the Create and preserve open spaces that give identity to campus zones. clinical zone. Primary open spaces within the campus include the research and clinical commons, Encourage combined use of parking facilities to increase efficiency. the education (Boettcher) commons, the informal open space connecting General s Integrate appropriate alternative and supplemental uses within parking structures to Park and the historic post chapel, the commons connecting the Red Cross building increase efficiency and convenience. and Building 500, and the historic parade grounds. Utilize land for designated for future development as surface parking areas to Create a network of open spaces that create opportunities for interaction between reduce initial development costs. faculty, students, and staff. Encourage the development of parking below grade and below buildings to use land Connect buildings and institutions with common open spaces that facilitate more efficiently. pedestrian and alternative mode movements. Integrate transit and other alternative modes of travel and access that reduce the use The research and clinical commons link the UCH and Anschutz Medical Center of single occupancy vehicles. with the teaching and research complex of the UC Denver. The educational Ensure that bike routes and pedestrian pathways are integrated with patterns in the (Boettcher) commons link the CHC with the teaching and clinical areas of the surrounding community. education zone. And, the commons north of Building 500 link the academic and Develop in a logical sequence. administrative areas with the town center. Enhance movement within the campus through the network of open spaces with views connecting architectural and landscape landmarks that provide orientation and facilitate wayfinding.