Municipal Obligations Archaeological Heritage Screening. Heritage Conservation Branch Ministry of Parks, Culture and Sport November 14, 2018

Similar documents
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BYLAW NO A bylaw to adopt Amendment No. 6 to the Official Plan for The Regional Municipality of York

Cultural Heritage Resources

APPENDIX G. Historical Resources Overview Documentation

Chapter 8: Cultural Heritage Assessment

STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF RATHBURN ROAD, FROM DUKE OF YORK BOULEVARD TO SHIPP DRIVE, CITY OF MISSISSAUGA. Submitted to:

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLANS (OCPs) AND ZONING BYLAWS (ZBs): PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE

Municipal Heritage Bridges Cultural, Heritage and Archaeological Resources Assessment Checklist Revised April 11, 2014

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

4. What are the goals of the Kawarthas, Naturally Connected project? 7. What are watersheds and why are they being used as the project boundaries?

PROJECT INFORMATION. The type of development

What is the EDPA? The EDPA has three objectives: 1. Protect biodiversity. 2. Mitigate damage during development. 3. Restore degraded ecosystems

Better Cycling. The City will update the cycling master plan (London ON Bikes) based on the approved BRT network.

Proposed St. Vital Transmission Complex

Development Reviews. An overview of the Commission s review process, primarily in Klickitat County. March 13, 2018

Cultural Heritage Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Managing our heritage resources: impact assessment.

Provincial Heritage Places Recognition Program

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

ARCHEOWORKS INC. Project Number: Licence/CIF#: P June 2006

Land Use Regional Planning in Alberta Collaborating with Stakeholders

F2. Draft Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Net Effects Analysis & Comparative Evaluation Report

Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

Revised License Report

STAGE 1 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF YONGE STREET SUBWAY EXTENSION, LOTS 37-41, CONCESSION EYS, TOWNSHIP OF MARKHAM, CITY OF TORONTO, YORK COUNTY

Alternative Routes. St. Vital to La Verendrye Station - Southern Loop Transmission Corridor. 20 different segments 4 segments common to all routes

Non-Metallic Mining Reclamation Checklist

150 Eighth Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

TRCA Field Staking Protocol December 2016

The MSII reports for the bridge indicate that the Annual Average Daily Traffic at the bridge is 100. The road can be considered a low volume road.

Summary of Other State Archeological Guidelines

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

APPENDIX 1: SCOPED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) FORM

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

STORM SEWER OUTFALLS AND CONNECTING OUTFALL CHANNELS. General Submission Requirements

2.0 REGULATORY CONTEXT

Alternative Route Selection

Original License Report. Submitted to: New Horizon Development Inc. 69 John Street South, Suite 304 Hamilton, Ontario L8N 2B9 Phone (905)

SUMMER VILLAGE OF SUNRISE BEACH

THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND HISTORICAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES

McKay Road Interchange and Salem / Lockhart Crossing

APPENDIX K WINDSOR OFFICIAL PLAN

Baby Point Heritage Conservation District Study. Kick-off Community Meeting March 27, 2017 Humbercrest United Church

HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES POLICIES

GEOMETRIC IMPROVEMENTS AND WATERMAIN LOOPING MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

A Technical Guideline for Cultural Heritage Resources. for Projects Planned Under the

CEQA and Historic Preservation: A 360 Degree Review

High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands)

1 STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETING INFORMATION REPORT PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO 6 TO THE YORK REGION OFFICIAL PLAN, 2010 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES

9 Archaeology & Cultural Heritage

112 College Street Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Station Street/Haig Road Extension Environmental Assessment (EA)Study. Welcome

Archaeological Monitoring of Land at 29 Royal Pier Road, Gravesend, Kent

Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Land at Kent Cottage, 19 Chapel Street, Hythe, Kent

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Zone: I-3. Tier:

PA Conservation Explorer. June 2015

Scarborough Waterfront Project

Alberta policy and regulations for grassland reclamation criteria, evolution of the criteria from the 1995 version to today

STORMWATER SITE PLAN INSTRUCTIONS AND SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE Medium and Large Projects

PennDOT. single spann lanes and 3- mayy need to be to accommodate. any bridge. addition to III. Date: CRP 07/27/2015 CRP.

HERITAGE WESTERN CAPE. 10 June 2015 Version 13 for Comment

Purpose of Report...1. Planning Framework Provincial Policy Statement Draft PPS...2. Ontario Heritage Act...3

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR Office of the City Solicitor Planning Department

STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE MISSISSAUGA BRT (EAST), CITY OF MISSISSAUGA. Submitted to:

PANSHANGER QUARRY, Hertfordshire

PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ERF 3 ROBERTSON WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE

Burloak Drive Grade Separation

April 4, 2013 Rana Ahmadi San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94103

Minnesota Department of Natural Resource - Natural Resource Guidance Checklist Conserving Natural Resources through Density Bonuses

Bostwick Road. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. Public Information Centre #2 June 14, City of London

HURON COMMUNITY PLAN

TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM STRATEGY APPENDIX F: MODEL POLICIES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TARGET TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT THE PROPOSED SWARTLAND SHOPPING MALL

2.1.8 Cultural Resources Regulatory Setting. Affected Environment, Environmental

Archaeology and Planning in Greater London. A Charter for the Greater London Archaeology Advisory Service

BC Soil Information Finder Tool

Final Initial Study. Chalice Unitarian Universalist Congregation Conditional Use Permit

Paul D. Ralph, BES, RPP, MCIP, Commissioner, Development Services Department. Proposed Storm Water Pond Maintenance Fee

9.1 ISSUES OBJECTIVES RULES - Class B - Heritage Items RULES - Class C - Heritage Items RULES - Old Town Overlay Area 18

Detritus Consulting Ltd.

Subject: Identification and Confirmation Procedure for Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest Compiled by Branch Ontario Parks

Fire and Emergency Services Newfoundland and Labrador. Public Hearings Proposed Lower Churchill Hydroelectric Generation Project March 2011

Describing the Integrated Land Management Approach

PUBLIC MEETING SEPTEMBER 19, 2012

8 Oak Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Submitted: July 23, 2009

SPG 1. * the northern and western sections which are open fields used for pasture and grazing;

TABLE OF CONTENTS HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT I. INTRODUCTION HP. A. Purpose HP B. Assessment and Conclusions...

Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Stevens County Partnership Shoreline Master Program Update

OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE PLANNING ACT SECTION 26

NORTHEAST RIVER CROSSING FUNCTIONAL PLANNING STUDY

APPENDIX A. Proposed Guidance and LID checklists for UConn and Town of Mansfield

THE FUTURE OF THE MCABEE FOSSIL BEDS HERITAGE SITE - Aligning the management of the site with fossil management approaches

MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF ROCKY VIEW NO.

Leaside to Main Infrastructure Refurbishment Project

Section 4 Review of Development Applications

Transcription:

Municipal Obligations Archaeological Heritage Screening Heritage Conservation Branch Ministry of Parks, Culture and Sport November 14, 2018

Legislative Authority: The Heritage Property Act, 1980 Impact Assessment and Mitigation (s.63) An archaeological impact assessment may be required for development or works likely to damage heritage property; The cost of the assessment by a qualified archaeologist is a developer responsibility; Developments include municipal works such as road construction, water and sewer projects, gravel extraction, etc.

Archaeological Heritage in Saskatchewan Currently over 24,500 archaeological sites are on the Provincial Archaeological Site Inventory, including First Nations, Metis, Fur Trade and Settler sites; First Nations sites are up to 13,000 years old; Some sites are visible on the ground surface and some have deposits that are deeply buried (to 4m or more); Approximately 300 archaeological sites are discovered and recorded each year, mostly through the land development review and approval process; these are found especially along creeks, rivers, lakes and sloughs and on undisturbed native prairie, forest, and sand dunes.

Does the Online Screening Tool indicate any of the quarter-sections planned for development are heritage sensitive? No Submit development proposal to HCB for heritage resource review Is a Heritage Resource Impact Assessment (HRIA) required by the HCB? Developer employs qualified heritage consultant to undertake HRIA Were heritage site(s) found by the HRIA? Are heritage sites avoided / adverse impacts mitigated / all concerns addressed? No No No Development Proceeds Further site assessment / impact mitigation / other action is required by HCB

Move to Saskatchewan.ca

Move to Saskatchewan.ca

Heritage Screening, Sensitivity, Reviews and Assessment 1. Heritage sensitivity mapping was initially developed in Saskatchewan to provide a screening tool for oil and gas developments, to help developers identify which oil and gas projects needed to be referred to the HCB for heritage resource review and which did not need any further heritage review or assessment. 2. This screening capability was welcomed by the oil and gas industry as it eliminated the need to refer all developments to the HCB, thus reducing unnecessary paperwork, cost uncertainty and generally speeding up the process of heritage resource reviews, as the HCB could focus on reviewing proposals in areas of sensitivity. 3. Over time, heritage screening has been applied to other types of development and heritage sensitivity mapping was also extended over the southern half of the province, not just the oil and gas producing areas. 4. Identification of heritage sensitivity is based on two things: (1) the known presence of archaeological sites; (2) the potential of a location to contain undisturbed archaeological sites. Locations that have known archaeological sites are sensitive. Locations that do not have any known archaeological sites (and have not been searched for archaeological sites in the past by archaeologists), but have a high or moderate potential to contain undisturbed archaeological sites, are considered sensitive. All other locations are not considered sensitive, including disturbed land, land surveyed by archaeologists and found to not contain archaeological sites, and land that has a low potential to contain undisturbed archaeological sites.

Heritage Screening, Sensitivity, Reviews and Assessment, cont. 5. If a location is identified as sensitive, the proposed development is referred to the HCB for a detailed review. This is where an archaeologist at the HCB does a desktop review of the proposed development to decide if a Heritage Resources Impact Assessment (HRIA) is required. Major considerations include the development footprint and location, and the results of previous archaeological work in the area. In many cases an HRIA is not required and the development can proceed with no further heritage review or assessment. 6. The Developers Online Screening Tool is a free, web-accessible database of quarter-sections that have been reviewed for archaeological heritage sensitivity. This Tool and instructions for its use are available on the HCB website: http://www.saskatchewan.ca/residents/parks-recreationheritage-and-arts/heritage/developers-online-heritage-screening-tool 7. Recently, an Exempt Activities Checklist for Private Landowners was developed by the HCB, in conjunction with guidance from SARM, to advise landowners that if they are applying to an RM for an approval to undertake private, small scale activities that constitute improvements to, or maintenance of, their private property, these activities are exempt from heritage screening. This checklist is also available on the HCB website. The purpose of the Exempt Activities Checklist for Private Landowners is to avoid landowners unnecessarily going through the heritage review process and to provide a guide for RMs to understand which applications should be subject to heritage screening (and which should not).

Move to Saskatchewan.ca

Move to Saskatchewan.ca

Move to Saskatchewan.ca

Move to Saskatchewan.ca

Does the Online Screening Tool indicate any of the quarter-sections planned for development are heritage sensitive? No Submit development proposal to HCB for heritage resource review Is a Heritage Resource Impact Assessment (HRIA) required by the HCB? Developer employs qualified heritage consultant to undertake HRIA Were heritage site(s) found by the HRIA? Are heritage sites avoided / adverse impacts mitigated / all concerns addressed? No No No Development Proceeds Further site assessment / impact mitigation / other action is required by HCB

This presentation is for information and discussion purposes only. It is not intended for publication, reproduction or any form of distribution without permission in advance from the Heritage Conservation Branch.

Move to Saskatchewan.ca