Brief Synopsis of the Japanese MOE Sponsored Evaluation of Wind Turbine Noise

Similar documents
Wayside horn noise investigation

Room Acoustics, PA Systems and Speech Intelligibility for Voice Alarm Systems using the example of the Cruise Center Steinwerder

The development history of sound level meter in Japan

S TAR-ORION S OUTH D IAMOND P ROJECT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT S TATEMENT APPENDIX A FUNDAMENTALS OF ACOUSTICS

Measuring Sound Pressure Level with APx

Study and Assessment of Low Frequency Noise in Occupational Settings

1 Introduction - The rating level. 3 Subjective or objective analysis? 2 Determination of the adjustment for annoying tones

Changes in Ecma standards for measurement of noise from IT products

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

QUANTIFICATION OF TONAL PENALTIES IN ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENTS

Analysis of a Condenser in a Thermal Power Plant for Possible Augmentation in its Heat Transfer Performance

The advantages of using waveguides in Hi-Fi loudspeakers

A Study of Low Frequency Noise and Infrasound from Wind Turbines

OPTIMIC System Components SOUND SOLUTIONS FROM LIGHT TECHNOLOGY

Acoustics in open-plan offices A laboratory study

MASTER PLAN KICK-OFF Open House #1A, April 28, 2015

Loudspeaker s frequency response was measured in-room, using windowed MLS techniques. The 0.5m set-up and results are presented on the pictures below.

Effects of hearing protection on detection and reaction thresholds for reverse alarms

First Revision No. 82-NFPA [ Section No ] Submitter Information Verification. Committee Statement. 2 of /21/2013 1:03 PM

COURSE NAME: ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES FOR UNDERGRADUATES PAPER TITLE: ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES FOR UNDERGRADUATES

A Survey Study of Today s Monitoring Conditions

Technical Note. Noise emission from Dehumidifier Type C65E TC Project no.: I Page 1 of July 2016

draft dated 9/17/2015 page 1

Preparation of response measurements for crossover simulation with VituixCAD

AFMG. Design for Speech Intelligibility Using Software Modeling. Stefan Feistel, Bruce C. Olson AHNERT FEISTEL MEDIA GROUP

In order to ensure that there is a clear interpretation of this report the following meanings should be applied to the acoustic terminology:

TECHNICAL DATA SHEET. FreeSpace DS 100F. Loudspeaker. Product Overview. Product Information. Key Features. Applications

System Using Exhaust Heat from Residential GHPs

Identification of Aberrant Railroad Wayside WILD and THD Detectors: Using Industry-wide Railroad Data. June 10, 2014

Evacuation Tragedies Do Happen Kaprun Scandinavian Star Manchester Dusseldorf Airport Kings Cross

NFPA Changes

Non-destructive inspection method for concrete elements in tunnel linings using laser remote sensing

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Improvement of Detectability of Alar Noisy Environments by Utilizing Spat. Author(s)Uchiyama, Hideaki; Unoki, Masashi; A

TECHNICAL DATA SHEET. FreeSpace DS 16F 1 OF 8. Loudspeaker. Product Overview. Product Information. Key Features. Applications

Test Report Nº B2016 LACUS IN 24

GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTICAL TERMS

Annual environmental performance evaluation of light and heat in daylight harvesting systems using Radiance and NewHASP

Multichannel Audio Technologies. Setting up for Surround Sound. But First. - A little about Codecs

The Use of Public Address System to Improve Tunnel Safety - Current Practices. Lim Hock Tay

Setting up the Versarray System

Vetiver System for Xinchang Railway Embankment Stabilization The First Vetiver Application for Railway in China

TREATMENT AND CONDITIONING OF DISMANTLED MATERIAL AND OPERATION WASTE IN EWN OVERVIEW. Rohde, Mathias

4/8/2015 Item #10D Page 1

OWNERS MANUAL TSUNAMI 10 D

A Guide to Occupational Noise Measurement Terminology

Electro-Voice. Loudspeakers. electrovoice.com

Loudspeaker Test. Report

CYLINDRICAL CASED AXIAL FLOW FANS. Cylindrical cased axial flow fans TCBB. Corrosion resistance. Impeller dynamically balanced.

o Rear HVAC columns (Priority 1: Item 3) the rear ceiling area: be more dead for the organ and traditional music. (Priority 2: Item A)

ISO 7779 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Acoustics Measurement of airborne noise emitted by information technology and telecommunications equipment

Consumer vacuum breast-pumps

HYPER SERIES What you really need

Hemi Anechoic Chamber Number:

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Loudspeaker Test. Report

AcoustiFlo Fans: Retrofit Solutions and Beyond

Comparison Blackberry Production Under High Tunnels and Field Conditions. High Tunnels

Emergency Vehicle Auditory Warning Signals: Physical and Psychoacoustic Considerations

Component Speaker System OWNER S MANUAL

Fire Alarm Intelligibility. Chris Nolan

ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF HOUSES AND LIFESTYLE IN COLD CLIMATIC AREA OF JAPAN

CMA TECHNICAL MANUAL CONDENSING UNITS FOR OUTDOOR INSTALLATION O L S A F RA N

Pre Study for the discussion on Reversing Alarm System" -Japanese current situations-

CHART PERUVIAN TECHNICAL STANDARDS

Planning and Public Consultation Process for the Preparation of a General Land Use Plan for South Port Kells TERMS OF REFERENCE

Emergency Vehicle Siren Noise Effectiveness

Powered Subwoofers. Proficient Protege FS10 vs Proficient PS10 Subwoofer Comparison

ACTIVA SERIES ROOF TOP Air Conditioners 017/040

Chalk, Cheese, Fish and Fowl: Comparing noise criteria - A Northbridge example. Peter Popoff-Asotoff

Compact Horizontal Air-Air Heat Pump Model RTH 07L to 30L. Technical information. Ref.: N

Component Speaker System OWNER'S MANUAL

Packaged air conditioning unit condensed by air model RTC 07L to 30L. Technical information. Ref.: N

Setting A Standard on Fire Safety in Laboratories

TECHNICAL DATA SHEET. FreeSpace DS 40SE 1 OF 8. Loudspeaker. Product Overview. Product Information. Key Features. Applications

Cooling Options for Geothermal and Concentrating Solar Power Plants

Predicting Narrow-band and Wideband Speech Quality with WB-PESQ and TOSQA

Queen St E & Leslie St Noise Analysis Toronto, Ontario. Toronto Transit Commission Streetcar Department 1900 Yonge Street Toronto, ON M4S 1Z2

Fan Laws. Keith Miller. Samuel Tepp Associates. Paul Cenci, P. E.-Principal Brian England-Principal. Samuel Tepp Associates 1/6/10

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Product Application Guide- IEC Medical Alarms. cul On-line Listing of Models Approved to IEC :

Low-noise fans are not a product of chance

Resume Curriculum. Dr Fawzy Mohamed Ahmed El_Behairy] Assistant prof. Civil Eng. Department. Assiut University. Assiut, Egypt

Mobile home became 50 Non-Work

Sound absorption coefficient Equivalent sound absorption area Sound absorption coefficient Sound absorption class

LB3 Premium Cabinet Loudspeakers

PATROL SOUNDERS 110/120 db(a) PA 10 / PA 20

Cable Dehumidification Systems for Suspension Bridges. Daniel Faust, P.E. AECOM, Inc.

Handbook Qualification Quiet Room label

TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON SOUND AND VIBRATION, ICSV10 REAL TIME CONTROL OF SOUND PRESSURE AND ENERGY DENSITY IN A MINING VEHICLE CABIN

National Grid Residential Active Demand Reduction Demonstration Project. MA EEAC Demand Reduction Sub-Committee February 23, 2017

PATROL SOUNDERS 100/105 db(a) PA 1 / PA 5

XEQ Front panel Sub output level control IDX MANUAL AND USER GUIDE 7-BAND EQUALIZER WITH DIRECT SUB INPUT 3-WAY CROSSOVER WITH SUB SONIC FILTER

LC1 Modular Ceiling Loudspeaker Range. en Installation note

In-Situ Roll Balancing A Revolutionary Method for Improving Dryer Section Performance

AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE ADOPTION OF UNIFORM CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND RECIPROCAL RECOGNITION OF APPROVAL FOR MOTOR VEHICLE EQUIPMENT AND PARTS

LB3-PCx50 Premium Cabinet Loudspeakers

PROFESSIONAL SOUND SYSTEM

Performance of Solar Water Heating Systems in the United States

N4H4. Product Specifications 14 SEER HEAT PUMP. ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND R 410A REFRIGERANT 1½ THRU 5 TONS SPLIT SYSTEM 208 / 230 Volt, 1 phase, 60 Hz

Transcription:

Brief Synopsis of the Japanese MOE Sponsored Evaluation of Wind Turbine Noise Principal Investigator: Dr. Hideki Tachibana Presented by Mark Bastasch, PE, INCE Slides Courtesy of Dr. Tachibana

Research on the Evaluation of Human Impact of Low Frequency Noise from Wind Turbine Generators (sponsored by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan) The Ministry of the Environment, Japan Research Committee WG for Field Measurement WG for Social Survey Executive Groups West-Japan Middle-Japan East-Japan Secretariat: Chiba Institute of Technology and INCE/J WG for Auditory Experiments WG for Material Survey Acoust. Lab., I.I.S.,Tokyo Univ. Research group for the study program on wind turbine noise

Double wind-screen wind-screen 2 cm wind-screen 7 cm Naked Mic. 8 Hz in 1/3 octave band 16 Hz in 1/3 octave band Experiments on the performances of the wind-screen

Table 1 Wind farms under the field measurements ID W1 Scale of the wind farms and geographical features 1 turbine of 1.98 MW on a hill of a peninsula Measurement Dec. 21 W2 W3 7 turbines of 2.5 MW in mountainous area 1 turbines of 2 MW in mountainous area Jan. 211 Feb. 211 W4 W5 1 turbines of 1,3 MW in mountainous area 9 turbines of 1.5 MW on a tableland Mar. 211 Feb. 211 W6 W7 6 turbines of 1.5 MW on a tableland 9 turbines of 2.3 MW along the ridge of a mountain Feb. 211 Aug. 211 W8 W9 21 turbines of 2.4 MW in mountainous area 9 turbines of 1.5 MW along a coast Oct. 211 Dec. 211 W1 W11 1 turbine of 1.5 MW in the skirts of a mountain 1 turbine of 1.98 MW on a mountaintop along a coast Dec. 211 Jan. 212 W12 5 turbine s of 1.99 MW in a hilly area Aug. 211 W13 1 turbine of 1 MW in a plain Nov. 211 29 W14 17 wind turbine s of farms 2 MW along the across ridge of a mountainjapan Dec. 211 W15 15 turbines of 2.5 MW along the ridge Jan. 212 W16 5 turbines of 3 MW along a coast Jan. 212 (164 W2 2 turbine measurement s of 4 kw, 4 turbines of 6 kw points and 2 Oct. in 211 turbines of 1.5 MW in flat farmlands W22 1 turbine of 1.95 MW a mountaintop Aug. 212 total W23 1 turbine in of immission 1.955 MW in a plain along areas) a coast Aug. 212 W24 1 turbines of 1.3 MW on a mountaintop Sep.-Oct. 212 W25 W27 8 turbines of 1.3 MW along the ridge of a mountain 2 turbines of 1 MW, 5 turbines of 1.5 MW and 14 Oct. 212 Sep. 212 turbines of 1.65 MW in a vast grassland W28 5 turbines of 1.5 MW and 1 turbine of 2.5 MW (not operated) on a hill along a coast Oct. 212 W29 1 turbine of 1.5 MW in gently sloping mountainous area Oct. 212 W3 1 turbines of 2 MW around a gently sloping mountainous area Nov. 212 W31 W32 1 turbine of 6 kw on a hill 1 turbine of 1 MW between harbor facilities and a Jan. 213 Sep. 212 coastal park W33 1 turbine of 4 kw in a hilly park Sep. 212 W34 1 turbines of 1.95 MW in farmlands Sep. 212

1/3 octave band sound pressure level [db] 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Frequency [Hz] Hearing threshold levels in DIN 4568 Hearing threshold levels in NSG guideline Criterion curve by Moorhouse et al. Hearing thresholds for pure tones (ISO 389-7) 1 2 4 8 16 31.5 63 125 25 5 1k 2k 4k Measurement results of WTN at 164 points around 29 wind farms

4.21 m 4.4 m Sound absorptive finishing (3 cm) 6.72 m Sound absorbing material 16 woofers + full range LS. 3.5 m Listening position Expanded metal + carpet (.9 m height) 6.86 m Power Amplifier (SONY, SRP-P45) Power Amplifiers (Accuphase, Pro-3 4) Multi-channel Interface (RME, Multiface AE) PC (hp) Listener s response Acoustic Lab., IIS, The University of Tokyo Hearing-thresholds for pure-tones at low frequencies (1 Hz 25 Hz) Audibility of low frequency components in WTN Hearing-thresholds for band-limited noise in low frequency range Effect of Amplitude Modulation in WTN Loudness sensation for various kinds of environmental sounds Auditory experiments

1/3-octave-band sound pressure level [db] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Test sounds No.1: WTN near a wind turbine (56 dba) No.2: WTN outside a residence (44 dba) No.3: WTN inside a residence(27 dba) 4 8 16 31.5 63 125 25 5 1k 2k 4k Frequency [Hz] Audibility of low frequency components in WTN

1/3-octave-band sound pressure level [db] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Audible/sensible? No.1: WTN near a wind turbine (56 dba) 4 8 16 31.5 63 125 25 5 1k 2k 4k Frequency [Hz] Over all Audibility of low frequency components in WTN

Test sound No.1, cut-off: 125 Hz on off on Modulation of the test sound subject s response off Time [s] 124 (a) on/off of the test sound and the subject s response Correlation coefficient 1..8.6.4.2. -.2-8 38 ms.979-6 -4-2 2 4 6 8 Time delay [s] (b) Cross-correlation between the two binary signals shown in figure (a) Audibility test by applying the MLS modulation technique

Test sound No.1, cut-off: 2 Hz on Modulation of the test sound off on subject s response off Time [s] 124 (a) on/off of the test sound and the subject s response Correlation coefficient 1..8.6.4.2. -.2-8.31-6 -4-2 2 4 6 8 Time delay [s] (b) Cross-correlation between the two binary signals shown in figure (a) Audibility test by applying the MLS modulation technique

1/3-octave-band sound pressure level [db] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 7/1 4 8 16 31.5 63 125 25 5 1k 2k 4k Frequency [Hz] Over all Audibility of low frequency components in WTN

1/3-octave-band sound pressure level [db] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 3/1 4 8 16 31.5 63 125 25 5 1k 2k 4k Frequency [Hz] Over all Audibility of low frequency components in WTN

1/3-octave-band sound pressure level [db] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 /1 Over all 4 8 16 31.5 63 125 25 5 1k 2k 4k Frequency [Hz] Audibility of low frequency components in WTN

1/3-octave-band sound pressure level [db] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 /1 Over all 4 8 16 31.5 63 125 25 5 1k 2k 4k Frequency [Hz] Audibility of low frequency components in WTN

1/3-octave-band sound pressure level [db] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 /1 Over all 4 8 16 31.5 63 125 25 5 1k 2k 4k Frequency [Hz] Audibility of low frequency components in WTN

1/3-octave-band sound pressure level [db] 9 8 7 6 5 4 2 1 /1 /1 1/1 /1 3/1 1/1 7/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 Background noise in the test room Frequency [Hz] Cutoff frequency 125 Hz 63 Hz 5 Hz 4 Hz 31.5 Hz Over all 25 Hz 2 Hz 16 Hz 12.5 Hz 1 Hz Conclusion: 3 Infrasound in this WTN is not audible/sensible. 4 8 16 31.5 63 125 25 5 1k 2k 4k Audibility of low frequency components in WTN

4.21 m 4.4 m Sound absorptive finishing (3 cm) 6.72 m Sound absorbing material 16 woofers + full range LS. 3.5 m Listening position Expanded metal + carpet (.9 m height) 6.86 m Power Amplifier (SONY, SRP-P45) Power Amplifiers (Accuphase, Pro-3 4) Multi-channel Interface (RME, Multiface AE) PC (hp) Listener s response Acoustic Lab., IIS, The University of Tokyo Hearing-thresholds for pure-tones at low frequencies (1 Hz 25 Hz) Audibility of low frequency components in WTN Hearing-thresholds for band-limited noise in low frequency range Effect of Amplitude Modulation in WTN Loudness sensation for various kinds of environmental sounds Auditory experiments

Relative response [db] +1-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6-7 C A 16 31.5 63 125 25 5 1k 2k 4k 8k 16k 31.5k Frequency [Hz] A-weighted SPL : L A Applicable? Various kinds of environmental noises Wind turbine noise

Categories No. Contents L Aeq,1s [db] (a) Environmental sounds (1) (a) Environmental sounds (1) (b) Transportation noises (5) (b) Transportation noises (5) (c) Cabin noises (7) (c) Cabin noises (7) (d) Other environmental sounds (6) noises(6) (d) Other environmental (e) Wind turbine noises (5) (e) Wind turbine noises (5) (f) Model noises for wind turbine noise (5) (f) Model noises for WTN (4) 1 Environmental sound in a forest 31 2 Sound of soughing through pine trees 61 3 Environmental sound on a seashore : A 61 4 Environmental sound on a seashore : B 54 5 Environmental noise in residential area : A 43 6 Environmental noise in residential area : B 32 7 Environmental noise in residential area : C 38 8 Noise in an industrial estate 49 9 Chirp of cicada in summer 54 1 Chirp of insects in autumn 38 11 Railway noise 76 12 Road traffic noise (distance: 22 m) 76 13 Road traffic noise (distance: 85 m) 63 14 Road traffic noise (distance: 85 m, in house) 43 15 Aircraft noise 65 16 Cabin noise in a jet-plane A 73 17 Cabin noise in a jet-plane B 81 18 Cabin noise in a super-express train 68 19 Cabin noise in a super-express train in a tunnel 71 2 Cabin noise in a conventional train 7 21 Cabin noise in (31 a conventional to train 81 running db on a steel inbridge L 7 22 Cabin noise in a car running on a highway Aeq ) 72 23 Air-conditioning equipment : A 4 24 Air-conditioning equipment : B 61 25 Air-conditioning equipment : C 66 26 Structure-borne sound from a subway truck 45 27 Concourse of a railway station 64 28 Construction noise (concrete breaker) 79 29 Wind turbine noise (near a wind turbine) 56 3 Wind turbine noise (residential area: outside) 43 31 Wind turbine noise (residential area: inside) 27 32 Wind turbine noise (with insects sounds) 41 33 Wind turbine noise (insects sounds were cut off) 37 34 35 35 Artificial noises with a spectrum characteristic of 45 36-4dB/octave in band spectrum modeling general wind 55 37 turbine noises 65 38 75 38 kinds of environmental sounds 38 sounds used in the experiment on the loudness for environmental sounds

(a) Environmental sounds (b) Transportation noises (c) Cabin noises (d) Other environmental noises (e) Wind turbine noises (f) Model noises for WTN 38 sounds used in the experiment on the loudness for environmental sounds

The loudness scores obtained in the experiment were arranged by using four kinds of noise indicators: (i) L Aeq : time-averaged A-weighted SPL (IEC 61672-1) (ii) L Ceq : time-averaged C-weighted SPL (IEC 61672-1) (iii) LL Z : Zwicker loudness level (ISO 532B) (from the time-averaged 1/3-octave-band SPLs from 25 Hz to 12.5 khz) (iv) LL MG : Moore-Glasberg loudness level (ANSI S3.4-27) (from the time-averaged 1/3-octave-band SPLs from 5 Hz to 16 khz) Loudness test by 7-step category

Loudness score (7-step category) 7 6 5 4 3 2 (i) L Aeq (i) L Aeq r=.993 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 L Aeq [db] 7 Loudness score (7-step category) 7 6 5 4 3 2 (ii) L Ceq (ii) L Ceq r=.934 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 L Ceq [db] 7 Loudness score (7-step category) 6 5 4 3 2 (iii) LL ZZ r=.991 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 LL Z [phon] Loudness score (7-step category) 6 5 (iv) LL MG MG 4 3 2 r=.988 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 LL MG [phon] Loudness test by 7-step category

Relative response [db] +1-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6-7 C A 16 31.5 63 125 25 5 1k 2k 4k 8k 16k 31.5k Frequency [Hz] A-weighted SPL : L A Applicable Various kinds of environmental noises Wind turbine noise

CONCLUSIONS (1) Acoustical characteristics of WTN: The frequency components in infrasound region contained in WTN are generally much below the hearing thresholds and hardly audible/sensible. However, most of the frequency components in audible frequency range are above the hearing thresholds and can cause annoyance when the background noise is low. Therefore, WTN should be discussed as an audible environmental noise. 1 8 1/3 octave band sound pressure level [db] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Not Audible/ sensible Frequency [Hz] Hearing threshold levels in DIN 4568 Hearing threshold levels in NSG guideline Criterion curve by Moorhouse et al. Hearing thresholds for pure tones (ISO 389-7) - 4 db/octave Audible 1 2 4 8 16 31.5 63 125 25 5 1k 2k 4k Sound Pressure Level [db] 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 /1 /1 1/1 /1 1/1 3/1 1/1 7/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 8 16 32 63 125 25 5 1k 1/3 octave band center frequency [Hz] Auditory experiment on low frequency components in WTN

CONCLUSIONS (2) Noise indicator: WTN can be assessed by the A-weighted SPL as a primary indicator, in common with general environmental noises. Relative response [db] +1-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6-7 C A 16 31.5 63 125 25 5 1k 2k 4k 8k 16k 31.5k Frequency [Hz] A-weighting Loudness score (7-step category) 7 6 5 4 3 2 (a) L Aeq r=.993 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 L Aeq [db] Loudness test on various noises

Additional NCEJ publications in progress