APPENDIX G. Historical Resources Overview Documentation

Similar documents
Municipal Obligations Archaeological Heritage Screening. Heritage Conservation Branch Ministry of Parks, Culture and Sport November 14, 2018

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BYLAW NO A bylaw to adopt Amendment No. 6 to the Official Plan for The Regional Municipality of York

Original License Report. Submitted to: New Horizon Development Inc. 69 John Street South, Suite 304 Hamilton, Ontario L8N 2B9 Phone (905)

ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Proposed Relocation for Ninth Line, Markham and Whitchurch-Stouffville. Environmental Screening Report

Northeast Anthony Henday Drive Manning Freeway to Whitemud Drive Welcome to this Construction Information Session

Station Street/Haig Road Extension Environmental Assessment (EA)Study. Welcome

Oweninny Wind Farm. Oweninny Environmental Impact Statement Appendix 13. Cultural Heritage Correspondence

ln the North Saskatchewan River Valley and Ravine System

Aurum Industrial Business Park Area Structure Plan

STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF RATHBURN ROAD, FROM DUKE OF YORK BOULEVARD TO SHIPP DRIVE, CITY OF MISSISSAUGA. Submitted to:

Stage 2: WestConnex M5 King Georges Road Interchange Upgrade. Appendix B5 Construction Heritage Management Plan

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

STAGE 1 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF YONGE STREET SUBWAY EXTENSION, LOTS 37-41, CONCESSION EYS, TOWNSHIP OF MARKHAM, CITY OF TORONTO, YORK COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 February 09. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

24. ARCHAEOLOGY & BUILT HERITAGE

Bostwick Road. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. October 13, City of London. Bostwick Road Municipal Class Environmental Assessment

City of Spruce Grove East Campsite Business Park Area Structure Plan

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department

Cy Becker Neighbourhood Structure Plan

ARCHEOWORKS INC. Project Number: Licence/CIF#: P June 2006

2.1.8 Cultural Resources Regulatory Setting. Affected Environment, Environmental

Revised License Report

BYLAW NO. 3549/2015. Being a Bylaw of The City of Red Deer to provide a uniform levy of off-site costs in respect of previously undeveloped land.

STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE MISSISSAUGA BRT (EAST), CITY OF MISSISSAUGA. Submitted to:

ELLERSLIE AREA STRUCTURE PLAN

Leduc Industrial Outline Plan SE W4

McKay Road Interchange and Salem / Lockhart Crossing

Summerside Neighbourhood Structure Plan

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department KENNEDY DEVELOPMENTS LTD. OUTLINE PLAN OP-09-01

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION 2016 November 03. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

PennDOT. single spann lanes and 3- mayy need to be to accommodate. any bridge. addition to III. Date: CRP 07/27/2015 CRP.

City of Cornwall Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. Proposed Improvement and Extension of Lemay Street

Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre

STAFF REPORT FOR STANDARD COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT #CDP FEBRUARY 26, 2015 CPA - 1 PO BOX 238 APTOS, CA 94001

Appendix I. Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment Report

Edgemont Neighbourhood Area Structure Plan

plan context INTRODUCTION 10 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 16 RELATED PLANS & INITIATIVES 10 CONSULTATION 30

Section 28, Township 52, Range 26, West of the 4th Meridian

Schonsee Neighbourhood Structure Plan of the Edmonton North Area Structure Plan

I 5 South Multimodal Corridor Study. Appendix F. I 5 South Multimodal Corridor Study Cultural Resources Constraints Analysis (February 8, 2010)

FURTHER TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #11/12 To be held on Friday, January 11, 2013

Maple Ridge Industrial Area Structure Plan

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

Cultural Heritage Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

Submitted: July 23, 2009

5: Cross Avenue Bridge, Sixteen Mile Creek Rail Bridge

PROJECT INFORMATION. The type of development

Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre

A Guide to Open Space Design Development in Halifax Regional Municipality

Site Option 3: Te Matai

Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport

Background Summary Report

The Uplands Area Structure Plan. City of Cold Lake, NE & SE W4

Introduction. Public Information Package. Project website. Overview. Class Environmental Assessment Process

OP Council Resolution June 16, Planning and Development Services

Greater London. Greater London 6/42 (D.01.M001) TQ

Bylaw No Page 1

Palisades Outline Plan

Welcome. Mill Creek Ravine Pedestrian Bridges Rehabilitation. Public Information Session #1. Thursday, October 27, :00 8:00 p.m.

Highway 2, Courtice

Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement Terms of Reference

Mistatim Area Structure Plan

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Phase I Ecological Network Report Terms of Reference

11. ISLINGTON ROUTE SECTION ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS OVERVIEW OF ISLINGTON ROUTE SECTION... 2

CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES

City of Larkspur. Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 285

Chappelle Neighbourhood Area Structure Plan

London s Bus Rapid Transit System

AMENDMENT NO. 30 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWN OF MILTON

The MSII reports for the bridge indicate that the Annual Average Daily Traffic at the bridge is 100. The road can be considered a low volume road.

THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND HISTORICAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES

CONCEPTUAL SCHEME FULTON INDUSTRIAL

Keswick Neighbourhood Structure Plan

Creating a Future for Alberta s Historic Places 1

C ity of Grande Prairie Development Services Department

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE RICHARDS, TEXAS FARM-TO-MARKET ROAD 149 FIBER OPTIC CABLE PROJECT IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS

LAND USE AMENDMENT CORNERSTONE (WARD 3) COUNTRY HILLS BOULEVARD AND STONEY TRAIL NE BYLAW 9D2017

Heritage Valley Neighbourhood 12 Neighbourhood Area Structure Plan

Northern Branch Corridor SDEIS March 2017

BANDON FLOOD RELIEF SCHEME

APPENDIX 9: Archaeological Assessment by Ken Phillips

Final Initial Study. Chalice Unitarian Universalist Congregation Conditional Use Permit

Circular L8/08 2 September Water Services Investment and Rural Water Programmes Protection of Natural Heritage and National Monuments

PROJECT STATEMENT LOCATION/DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING. 19 th AVENUE NORTH EXTENSION PROJECT FROM SPRINGDALE DRIVE TO NORTH 2 ND STREET/U.S.

Phase One Archaeological Investigation Results, James Madison Park Master Development Plan Project, City of Madison, Dane County, Wisconsin

Starling Neighbourhood Structure Plan

Proposed Plan Change 55: District Wide Rules. Hearing Report

Upcoming Projects and Emerging Issues

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Preparation of National Register of Historic Places. Nominations for the following:

NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY

M E M O R A N D U M. Chair and Members of North West Planning Advisory Committee

Information for File # ARC

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

GEOMETRIC IMPROVEMENTS AND WATERMAIN LOOPING MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Red Deer County Heritage Management Plan

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

9 Archaeology & Cultural Heritage

COMMUNICATION URBAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA MAY 16, 2017 MEETING

SUMMER VILLAGE OF SUNRISE BEACH

Transcription:

APPENDIX G Historical Resources Overview Documentation

Statement of Justification for Historical Resources Act Requirements for projects other than small-scale oil and gas This document contains sensitive information about Historic Resources that are protected under provisions of the Alberta Historical Resources Act. This information is to be used to assist in planning the proposed project only. It is not to be disseminated, and no copies of this document are to be made without written permission of Historic Resources Management Branch, Alberta Culture. Project Name or Project Identifier 34 Street Upgrade from north of Whitemud Drive to Baseline Road Functional Planning Study Disposition Type & Number Name: Walt Kowal Corporate name of consulting company: The Archaeology Group Address: 2526 Bell Court S.W. Edmonton, Alberta T6W 1J8 Phone number: (780) 438-4262 Fax number: (780) 439-4285 E-mail address: w.kowal@shaw.ca Name of proponent contact: Natalie Lazurko Corporate name of proponent: Transportation Services Department, City of Edmonton Address: 12 th Floor, 9803 102A Avenue Edmonton, T5J 3A3 Phone number: (780) 442-4529 Fax number: (780) 496-4287 E-mail address: Natalie.lazurko@edmonton.ca Name of agent: Ryan Betker Corporate name of proponent: McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. Address: 14904-121A Avenue Edmonton, AB T5V 1A3 Phone number: (780) 809-3200 Fax number: (780) 809-3212 E-mail address: rbetker@mcelhanney.com Lands Affected Legal Description HRV Identifier LSD s 4, 5, 12, 13 Section 18-52-23-W4M LSD s 4, 5, 12, 13 Section 19-52-23-W4M LSD s 4, 5, 12, 13 Section 30-52-23-W4M LSD s 4, 5, 12, 13 Section 31-52-23-W4M LSD s 1, 8, 9, 16 Section 13-52-24-W4M LSD s 1, 8, 9, 16 Section 24-52-24-W4M LSD s 1, 8, 9, 16 Section 25-52-24-W4M LSD s 1, 8 Section 36-52-24-W4M LSD s 9, 16 Section 36-52-24-W4M 5 Palaeontological

2 Activity type and Anticipated Ground Disturbance The proposed project is for the upgrading of 34 th Street from just north of Whitemud Drive to Baseline Road a distance of approximately 6.04 kilometres, in the City of Edmonton (Figures 1 to 4). The new construction will require expanding the existing right-of-way and new lands will be required for this right-of-way expansion. Project size The 34 Street project is approximately 6.04 km in length and it is anticipated that less than approximately 15 ha of lands will be affected. Existing Disturbance Existing disturbance is present in the form of pre-existing roadways, industrial construction, infrastructure construction, agricultural activity, farmsteads, and landscaping. Landscape and Environmental Information Aspen Parkland Ecoregion. Till Blanket sediment: thick and continuous till, and fine grained (Glacio) lacustrine sediment: silt and clay, containing stones and deposited as quiet water sediments, cultivated land, small patches of forested land, and some urban areas. The project area ranges from flat to rolling and except for crossings at Fulton Creek in LSD 4 Section 19-52- 23-W4M and LSD 1 Section 24-52-24-W4M and Gold Bar Creek in LSD 12 Section 30-52-23- W4M and LSD 8 Section 25-52-24-W4M no other hydrologic features are present along the rightof-way. Archaeological Sites in Vicinity = approximately 80 sites within 5 kilometres of project Archaeological Sites Impacted = None Historic Structures in Vicinity = None Historic Structures Impacted = None Registered Historic Structures in Vicinity = None Registered Historic Structures Impacted = None Previous Permits in Impact Area = 96-023, 09-189 Previous Permits in Vicinity: 76-075, 79-039, 80-069, 82-140, 89-093, 96-023, 09-189, Illustrative Materials Figure 1: Map showing the project location (after 1:50,000 NTS Map 83 H/6 Cooking Lake and 83 H/11 - Edmonton). Figure 2: Map showing the project location and the location of previously recorded Historical Resources sites in the project vicinity (after 1:50,000 NTS Map 83 H/6 Cooking Lake and 83 H/11 - Edmonton). Figure 3: Map showing the project location and the location of previously conducted HRIA surveys and previously recorded Historical Resources sites in the vicinity of the 34 Street project (after 1:50,000 NTS Map 83 H/6 Cooking Lake and 83 H/11 - Edmonton). Figure 4: Map showing the locations of the 10 photomosaics of the project area which follow (see Figures 5 to 14). Figures 5 to 14. Photomosaics of the project area (locations identified on Figure 4).

Evaluation Approximately 80 archaeological sites have been previously recorded in the general vicinity of the project area, however no known sites are located within the project impact zone (see Figures 2 and 3). Almost all of these sites were isolated finds except for three which were lithic scatters. In the case of each site, the artifacts found were in a disturbed context, no significant historical remains were found, no palaeontological materials were found, and none of the located sites were considered significant and no further work was recommended for any of these sites. 3 LSD s 9 and 16 Section 36-52-24-W4M have an HRV=5 (palaeontological), but the areas of palaeontological concern are located along Gold Bar Creek on the western edge of these LSD s. All the rest of the study area has an HRV=. Almost all of the lands along the section of 34 Street under review have been previously disturbed by agriculture, industrial development, and railway right-of-way or road construction. The only areas not disturbed are seasonally wet or lower-lying areas not suitable for agriculture in the past and which are considered to have low archaeological potential as a result. Most of the proposed new right-of-way lands had possibly been cultivated for much of the last century, and have since been disturbed further by business development, infrastructure emplacement, or railroad/road construction. The only significant hydrologic features within the project area are Fulton Creek which crosses 34 Street in LSD 4 Section 19-52-23-W4M and LSD 1 Section 24-52-24-W4M and Gold Bar Creek which crosses 34 Street in LSD 12 Section 30-52-23-W4M and LSD 8 Section 25-52-24-W4M. An HRIA survey was conducted of the east side of Fulton Creek area under Permit 09-189, and no sites were found along its margins within the project area at the 34 Street crossing. Further the lands on the west side of the creek crossing appear to be low-lying and poorly-drained and there is no significant bank formation along this part of the creek so this area is considered to have low archaeological potential. The Gold Bar Creek crossing area is similarly low-lying and wet around the creek margins and is also considered to have low archaeological potential The previously disturbed nature of the study area lands suggest that there is little potential for finding undisturbed historical resources sites and no further Historical Resources work is considered warranted for this study area.

4 Recommendations (Recommendations regarding archaeological resources must be made by a professional archaeologist.) The proposed 34 Street upgrade project generally follows previously developed roadways and utility corridors. No previously recorded historic or archaeological sites will be disturbed by the development. Due to intensive previous ground disturbance due to sustained agricultural activity, industrial development, railroad/road construction, and other infrastructure emplacements, this right-of-way area is considered to have low potential for the discovery of intact, previously unrecorded heritage resources, and no further work is recommended for the 34 Street Upgrade from north of Whitemud Drive to Baseline Road Functional Planning Study area. Recommendations made by: Date: January 11, 2013 Walt Kowal

Figure 1. Map showing the project location (after 1:50,000 NTS Maps 83 H/6 Cooking Lake and 83 H/11 Edmonton). 5

Figure 2. Map showing the project location and the location of previously recorded Historical Resources sites in the project vicinity (after 1:50,000 NTS Maps 83 H/6 Cooking Lake and 83 H/11 Edmonton). 6

Figure 3. Map showing the project location and the location of previously conducted HRIA surveys and previously recorded Historical Resources sites in the vicinity of the 34 Street project (after 1:50,000 NTS Map 83 H/6 Cooking Lake and 83 H/11 - Edmonton). 7

8 Figure 4. Map showing the locations of 10 photomosaics of the project area which follow (see Figures 5 to 14).

Figure 5. Photomosaic of the southern end of the project area (location shown on Figure 4). 9

Figure 6. Photomosaic of the 2nd segment of the project area (location shown on Figure 4). 10

Figure 7. Photomosaic of the 3rd segment of the project area (location shown on Figure 4). 11

Figure 8. Photomosaic of the 4th segment of the project area (location shown on Figure 4). 12

Figure 9. Photomosaic of the 5th segment of the project area (location shown on Figure 4). 13

Figure 10. Photomosaic of the 6th segment of the project area (location shown on Figure 4). 14

Figure 11. Photomosaic of the 7th segment of the project area (location shown on Figure 4). 15

Figure 12. Photomosaic of the 8th segment of the project area (location shown on Figure 4). 16

Figure 13. Photomosaic of the 9th segment of the project area (location shown on Figure 4). 17

Figure 14. Photomosaic of the 10th segment of the project area (location shown on Figure 4). 18

Application for Historical Resources Act Clearance Activity Administration Date Received: January 25, 2013 HRM File: 4715-13-0001 Purpose of Application: All New Lands Additional Lands No New Lands Project Category: Transportation - Urban, Municipal and Local Roads and Other Transportation Projects (4715) Project Type: Urban Road ESRI Shapefiles are attached no (yes/no) Approximate Project Area (ha) 15 Project Identifier: Additional Identifier(s): 34 Street Upgrade Functional Planning Study; from North of Whitemud Drive to Baseline Road Key Contact: Mr. Walt A Kowal Affiliation: Archaeology Group Inc. Address: 2526 Bell Court SW City / Province: Edmonton, AB Postal Code: T6W 1J8 Phone: (780) 438-4262 E-mail: w.kowal@shaw.ca Fax: (780) 439-4285 Your File Number: Is the Proponent the same as the Key Contact? Yes No If no, complete the following: Proponent: City of Edmonton Contact Name: Natalie Lazurko Address: 12th Floor, 9803 102A Avenue City / Province: Edmonton, AB Postal Code: T5J 3A3 Phone: (780) 442-4529 E-mail: Natalie.lazurko@edmonton.ca Fax: (780) 496-4287 Proposed Development Area Land Ownership MER RGE TWP SEC LSD List FRH SA CU CT 4 23 52 30 4,5,12,13 4 23 52 31 4,5,12,13 4 24 52 25 1,8,9,16 4 23 52 18 4,5,12,13 4 24 52 13 1,8,9,16 4 24 52 24 1,8,9,16 4 24 52 36 1,8,9,16 4 23 52 19 4,5,12,13 Listed Lands Affected MER RGE TWP SEC LSD HRV Category 4 24 52 36 9 5 p HRM File: 4715-13-0001 Page 1 of 2

4 24 52 36 16 5 p Comments: Due to intensive previous ground disturbance due to sustained agricultural activity, industrial development, railroad/road construction, and other infrastructure emplacements, this right-of-way area is considered to have low potential for the discovery of intact, previously unrecorded heritage resources, and no further work is recommended for the 34 Street Upgrade from north of Whitemud Drive to Baseline Road Functional Planning Study area. Historical Resources Impact Assessment: For archaeological resources: Has a HRIA been conducted? Yes No Permit Number (if applicable): For palaeontological resource: Has a HRIA been conducted? Yes No Historical Resources Act clearance is granted subject to Section 31 of the Resources Act, "a person who discovers an historic resource in the course of making an excavation for a purpose other than for the purpose of seeking historic resources shall forthwith notify the minister of the discovery". The chance discovery of historical resources is to be reported to the contacts identified within the listing. February 19, 2013 Date HRM File: 4715-13-0001 Page 2 of 2