Jason Holland 4/8/2015 x. *BOLDED ITEMS ARE REQUIRED* *The more info provided, the more detailed your comments from staff will be.

Similar documents
W Harmony Rd. Group Home

1215 Shields Street Development PDR

Conceptual Review Agenda

*BOLDED ITEMS ARE REQUIRED* *The more info provided, the more detailed your comments from staff will be.* Project Name

Drake Rd & College Ave Spradley Barr Redevelopmentl

Staybridge Suites. Aerial Site Map CCR POL. 1 inch = 17,493 feet. 1 inch = 250 feet. Vicinity Map. Zoning Map RL.

Harmony Commons, Lot 1 Office

Preliminary Design Review. Poudre Garage Mixed Use December 14, 2015

Penny Flats North Mixed-Use Residential

^_ ^_. Sanctuary West UV 14 «1. Aerial Site Map. 1 inch = 16,667 feet. 1 inch RL= 1,042 feet. Vicinity Map. Zoning Map.

Conceptual Review Agenda

PDR /21/15 Noah Beals 1/7/15 xx

MEMORANDUM. I2 District Downtown Parking Overlay District 24,000 square feet /.55 acres. Industrial Employment District North Loop Small Area Plan

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

EYA Presentation to ANC 5A Committee of the Whole. The Josephite Seminary Property Washington, DC. April 13, 2016

OCEANSIDE DEVELOPER S CONFERENCE. 1. 9:30-10:30 a.m. Proposed hotel on a 12,000 sq. ft. site at the northeast corner of Topeka St. and Tremont St.

Downtown / Ballough Road Redevelopment Board

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

M E M O R A N D U M SITE DATA

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES OF COMMUNITY MEETING

CITY OF FORT COLLINS TYPE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FINDINGS AND DECISION. CS Commercial, LLC 1337 Riverside Avenue, Unit 1 Fort Collins, CO 80524

DRAFT Amsterdam/Churchill Community Plan (4/17/08) Adopted By the Gallatin County Commission

The following concept plans and illustrations are the result of this 10 month study of the alley connections from CSU to the River District.

New York Avenue Streetscape and Trail Project Public Meeting #1 Summary

GENERAL INFORMATION What is Stormwater? What is a stormwater utility? What is an impervious surface?

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

Harmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending, Project Development Plan/Final Development Plan - FDP #130021

VILLAGE OF PITTSFORD PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Regular Meeting January 27, 2014 at 7:00 PM. George Wallace Jill Crooker Joe Maxey

AMITY STATION Revised Concept Plan Review West Rosemary Street Chapel Hill, NC September 27, 2016

SITE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO: 5 STAFF: LONNA THELEN FILE NO: CPC CU QUASI-JUDICIAL ART C. KLEIN CONSTRUCTION

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

D ESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE

Allen Street Civic District Redevelopment Area Plan Redevelopment Plan & Proposal State College Planning Commission State College Redevelopment

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Chapter 1 - General Design Guidelines CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

MINUTES TOWN OF HORSEHEADS PLANNING BOARD MEETING August 2, 2017

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Denton. A. Downtown Task Force

Request Change in Nonconformity. Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. TO: Parking and Public Improvements Commission

CONCEPT PLAN APPLICATION

Illustration of Eastlake Farmer s Cooperative Grain Elevator. Chapter 5: implementation 5-1

September 28, 2017 Wentworth Avenue (CR 8) Sidewalk Improvements Open House

REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional)

2016 Comprehensive Plan

People who are members of historically disenfranchised racial, ethnic, cultural, and other identity groups are encouraged to apply.

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP)

MEMO 1. INTRODUCTION PURPOSE & PROCESS REQUEST

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016

CAMPUS PLANNING COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT SAMARITAN SPORTS MEDICINE INSTITUTE AT OSU 10/21/2013

City of Le Sueur DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

NEIGHBORHOOD 7: FEE LANE AREA. Aerial View of Briscoe and McNutt Dormitories

Major Development Order Approval Process. Introduction. In This Handout. Pre-Application Meeting. Meetings

Zoning Technical Review Presented by Camiros. November 10, 2015

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

FRAMEWORK OF DESIGN REVIEW:

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA OCTOBER

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

water that enters our streams during storms. Any water the rain garden can t accept will continue into the storm sewer system.

MEMORANDUM. Planning and Zoning Division Department of Community Development TO: FROM: DATE: July 23, SUBJECT: PLNSUB : Salt City Plaza

Good Design Guidelines for Downtown. Preliminary Findings and Recommendations

Bourne Downtown Site Planning

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

7-PARKS, OPEN SPACE & PUBLIC ART

117 E. Louisa St. #1 Seattle, WA January 29, 2016

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

City of Bristol Route 6 Corridor Implementation Program

2016 WORKSHOP LVR Field Trip

Site Development Plan (SDP) Checklist

PRESENTATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF GLEN COVE

The West College Avenue Corridor Redevelopment Plan

Dyersville Downtown Plan. Open House October 24, 2017

Project phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan

Historic District Commission Staff Report November 4 th & 18 th, 2015

PARKLET PROPOSAL PACKAGE & PROCESS

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018

Planned Development Application 1450 Sherman Avenue Evanston, IL Responses to DAPR Meeting I City Staff Comments

Building Great Neighbourhoods. Strathcona

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

A /19/2017 GAGAN RESIDENCE 1043 CENTINELA AVE. SANTA MONICA, CA CENTINELA AVE

Public may provide comments on the GDP within the next two weeks (December 24)

Re: Keeping Special Area D North of Jensen Lane In the Town Of Windsor s Urban Growth Boundary

Conceptual Review Agenda

RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation August 1, 2017

March 29, Angels Landing Project Angels Landing Partners, LLC

9IMPLEMENTATION AND PHASING

11 March 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: BUDDHIST EDUCATION CENTER OF AMERICA DONG HUNG TEMPLE, INC. PROPERTY OWNER: MOY FAMILY, LLC

Checklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:

Zoning Interface: Districts and Forms for Sioux Falls Zoning Ordinance

4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Transcription:

Development Review Guide STEP 2 of 8 PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW: APPLICATION General Information Preliminary design review is an opportunity for an applicant to discuss the requirements, standards, procedure, and potential modifications of standards or variances that may be necessary for a project and to generally consider the development proposal design which has been evaluated as a part of the conceptual review process. While the conceptual review process is a general consideration of the development proposal, a Preliminary Design Review considers the development proposal in greater detail. Problems of both a major and minor nature can be identified and solved during the preliminary design review before a formal application is made. Preliminary design review applications must be submitted to City Staff no later than 5 pm, two weeks prior to the Wednesday meeting date. Application materials can be e-mailed to currentplanning@fcgov.com or sent to/dropped off at 281 North College Avenue. Representatives of Community Development and Neighborhood Services (Zoning, Environmental Planning, Current Planning, and Development Review Engineering), Light and Power, Stormwater, Water/Waste Water, Advance Planning (Long Range Planning and Transportation Planning), Historic Preservation and Poudre Fire Authority regularly attend preliminary design review meetings. Additionally, other public or quasi-public agencies which may be impacted by the development project are invited and encouraged to attend the preliminary design review. These agencies may include the gas utility, water and/or wastewater utility districts, ditch companies, railroads, cable television service providers and other similar agencies. Upon receipt of a preliminary development proposal for review, and after review of such proposal with the applicant, the staff shall furnish the applicant with written comments and recommendations regarding such proposal in order to inform and assist the applicant prior to preparing components of the development application. The staff shall provide the applicant with a critical issues list, which will identify those critical issues that have surfaced in the preliminary design review as issues that must be resolved during the review process of the formal development application. To the extent that there is a misunderstanding or a misrepresentation of facts, the opinion of the staff may change during the course of development review. Section to be filled out by City Staff Date of Meeting Submittal Date PDR150006 4/22/2015 Jason Holland 4/8/2015 x Project Planner Fee Paid ($500) *BOLDED ITEMS ARE REQUIRED* *The more info provided, the more detailed your comments from staff will be.* Project Name Freedonia Brewing Ltd. at 208 Remington Project Address (parcel # if no address) 208 Remington St. Fort Collins, CO. Contact Name(s) and Role(s) (Please identify whether Consultant or Owner, etc) Ralf Kracke-Berndorff (owner of Freedonia Ltd., David Bartecchi (consultant). Business Name (if applicable) Freedonia Brewing Ltd. Applicant Mailing Address 321 Park St. Fort Collins, Co 80521 Phone Number E-mail 970-443-5632 Address ralfkb@gmail.com Basic Description of Proposal (a detailed narrative is also required) Minor remodel to convert former church into brewery and taproom. Zoning (D) Downtown Proposed Use Brewery/Taproom Existing Use Church Total Building Square Footage 4760 S.F. Number of Stories 1 Lot Dimensions 138' x 102' Age of any Existing Structures Original brick building (brick north portion) 1906. Cinder-block addition @ South 1969. Info available on Larimer County s Website: http://www.co.larimer.co.us/assessor/query/search.cfm *If any structures are 50+ years old, good quality, color photos of all sides of the structure are required. Increase in Impervious Area No increase to impervious area. S.F. (Approximate amount of additional building, pavement, or etc. that will cover existing bare ground to be added to the site) Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580

Development Review Guide STEP 2 of 8 SUBMITTAL INFORMATION: PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW (PDR) 1) Preliminary Design Review Application form and filing fee ($500). 2) Project Narrative Please include the following information: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) What are you proposing/use? What improvements and uses currently exist on the site? Describe the site circulation (auto and pedestrian), parking and how it coordinates with the existing neighborhood. Describe site design and architecture. How is your proposal compatible with the surrounding area? Is water detention provided? If so, where? (show on site plan) How does the site drain now (on and off site)? Will it change? If so, what will change? What is being proposed to treat run-off? How does the proposal impact natural features? Do any existing structures have automatic fire sprinklers? Will the new structures have fire sprinklers? Are there any unusual factors and/or characteristics are present that may restrict or affect your proposal? Have you previously submitted an application? (m) What specific questions, if any, do you want addressed? 3) Site Plan Please consider including the following: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Project site boundary and adjacent property uses Proposed circulation system, and how it ties into existing infrastructure (pedestrian and auto) Existing and proposed landscaping (Will trees be removed?) Existing and proposed buildings (Will they remain? If they will change, how?) Existing natural features (Will these be impacted by the proposal?) On and off site improvements Location of detention, drainage and water quality features Emergency vehicle access and fire hydrant locations Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 N College Ave Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580

Revised January 21, 2010 2 PDP Submittal Requirements

Narrative a. What are you proposing/use? We are proposing to convert the existing former church into a brewery and tap room. Freedonia will brew German style Lagers on a historic, 110 year old, all copper brew system brought over from Germany. The aesthetic appeal of the brew system, and the focus on lager beers, will make Freedonia a high end beer destination, on Remington Street, already home of 2 other iconic breweries (if counting Coopersmith s, which is technically on Mountain, and, unlike Equinox and Freedonia, a brewpub). b. What improvements and uses currently exist on the site? The original, 1906 building consists of a two story brick structure. In 1069, a single floor cinderblock chapel was added to the South. According to records, it was last used as a church. The second floor of the old building is an apartment, and shall remain a separate entity. The present application DOES NOT CONCERN THE SECOND FLOOR! c. Describe the site circulation (auto and pedestrian), parking and how it coordinates with the existing neighborhood. This property is located in the Downtown (D) District, Old City Center Subdistrict. While the site itself is surrounded on three sides by residences, the neighborhood in general consists of a mix of residential and commercial properties. Remington is the primary access to our site, it is a relatively calm section with people using it primarily to access parking along the street and at the Old Town Parking Garage and Oak Street Parking Lot from College Ave. to the West and Mountain Ave. to the North. There is a sidewalk directly West of the proposed site along Remington St. which is used mostly by people accessing nearby business from the parking along Remington St.

d. Describe site design and architecture. Design and architecture shall basically remain unaltered. The Brewery, i.e. area of production, storing, and dispensing the beer, shall be located in the cement floor, cinderblock, 1969 addition (the former Chapel ), while the Tap Room, with required bathrooms, etc., shall be placed on the first floor of the old building (former classrooms, halls, kitchen, and bathrooms). Hence, the changes made to the old portion of the building are limited to bringing the old bathrooms up to code and install a bar (with sinks etc., as required). The Brewery shall be separated with the necessary firewalls (and fire proof glass) from the tap room. The East third of the chapel (the altar or stage ) currently has a wooden floor, covering existing storage rooms in the basement (basement only under such portion, main cement floor without basement). We shall only demolish such storage rooms below, to allow for the construction of the brewing platform in the thusly created dug out. One garage door shall be opened in the South wall, and lead onto the loading ramp between brewery and covered beer garden patio. e. How is your proposal compatible with the surrounding area? According to the 2004 Downtown Strategic Plan our proposed brewery and taproom

will be located within a Transition/Infill Zone and would contribute nicely to the stated goal to utilize the energy from the core to leverage and attract new neighborhood serving businesses to locate in downtown, particularly in areas adjacent to residential neighborhoods. In particular, a second small neighborhood brewery (Freedonia and Equinox) on Remington Street will help establish the area as Fort Collin s downtown Craft Brewery Alley attracting a more mature customership that will transition into either home or into the core of downtown after 10pm. Our historic German brew system will also be an attractor for the growing number of beer tourists visiting Fort Collins from around the world. Remington Street will serve as a quieter, greener area of Old Town with Pete s Fly Shop and three cozy breweries. There is already a parking garage at the corner of Remington and Mountain, ample parking on the street, as well as in parking in the Oak Street Lot across the street from 208 Remington. In the old tradition of German hospitality, Freedonia will be a quiet neighborhood brewery, where locals, students, and visitors come to learn about the ancient craft of brewing, while enjoying one of its three reliable house lagers lighter, more drinkable beers. The historic, yet fully functional copper brew system was chosen, in order to allow for authentic brewing techniques, like decoction mashing, which are hardly found even in its original Germany these days anymore. Lay people and CSU s Brewing Science students alike will be able to follow the ancient process of lager brewing, at walking and biking distance from CSU, the downtown business area, and old town residences. Again, Fort Collins beer aficionados are used to the brewery and taproom model, which, as you know, is very different from brewpubs, and certainly from bars. In other words, the late night bar crowd will continue to enjoy the party zone of College Ave and the core of old town, without pouring into the quieter transition area of Remington. Different target audience, early vs. late crowd. f. Is water detention provided? If so, where? (show on site plan) There are no current water detention structures. g. How does the site drain now (on and off site)? Will it change? If so, what will change? The outfall for the site is the curb & gutter in Remington Street and the alley to the east. There will not be any changes to the drainage pattern of the site. h. What is being proposed to treat run off? Our use of the property should have no impact on the quality of stormwater run off. i. How does the proposal impact natural features? We plan to maintain and protect all trees and existing lawn on west side of building along Remington St. In an effort to enhance the aesthetics of the façade, we will

propose more landscaping features (hops vines, etc.) j. Do any existing structures have automatic fire sprinklers? Will the new structures have fire sprinklers? No, and No. As brewery will be completely, and appropriately, separated from the tap room, we were told that sprinklers will not be required. k. Are there any unusual factors and/or characteristics are present that may restrict or affect your proposal? No. l. Have you previously submitted an application? We submitted one in early March but that was before we were aware of the expedited process. New review scheduled for April 22nd, replacing the older one for May 18th. m. What specific questions, if any, do you want addressed? Will you allow the proposed change of use? This question needs to be answered before we can sign the lease. Site Plan Please consider including the following: a. Project site boundary and adjacent property uses

b. Proposed circulation system, and how it ties into existing infrastructure (pedestrian and auto) As an under utilized area of downtown, our proposed use will help direct traffic, parking, and bike traffic away from the core of downtown while attracting a clientele already focused on alternative modes of transportation. After our 10pm closure, our clientele will likely move into the core on foot or will go home, avoiding the congestion of downtown, by taking one of the main arterials leading away from downtown. c. Existing and proposed landscaping (Will trees be removed?) No trees shall be removed. We shall follow City s recommendations regarding landscaping. We shall try to enhance the appeal of the façade, by growing hops vines. Where landscaped sidewalks are not available, like around (but inside of) the beer garden (under existing, covered driveway), we plan to place potted plants. d. Existing and proposed buildings (Will they remain? If they will change, how?) There will be no buildings added to the site nor will there be any modifications or

additions to the existing buildings. e. Existing natural features (Will these be impacted by the proposal?) As part of the visual improvements of the building (façade, beer garden under existing covered driveway), we plan to enhance and integrate the natural features. In particular, hops vines shall climb the façade, and will, along with potted barley, showcase two of the four ingredients in beer. We appreciate your input on the required landscaping improvements. f. On and off site improvements See APPENDIX A g. Location of detention, drainage and water quality features There will be no increase to the impermeable surfaces and no requirement for additional detention, drainage or water quality features. h. Emergency vehicle access and fire hydrant locations Emergency vehicles have access on Remington St. and from the alley either from Oak St. or from Olive St.