Transfer of Development Rights

Similar documents
SECTION 1 Introduction...1. SECTION 2 Regional Context Criteria for Planning Districts Description of Planning District...

Warren County/Bowling Green Focus 2030 Comprehensive Plan VOLUME 1 INDEX

Section 9 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN

Conservation Development

Planning Roles. Responsibilities

Washtenaw County Department of Planning & Environment

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

6.0 Conclusions & Recommendations

3 Development Process 3.1 Stage One page Stage Two page Stage Three page CENTRAL PICKERING DEVELOPMENT PLAN

2018 Northampton Township Comprehensive Plan

6 Growth Management Challenges and Opportunities

Improve Neighborhood Design and Reduce Non Point Source Water Pollution

Envision Skagit 2060 Citizen Committee Briefing Paper

IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

Town of Clinton. New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council. January Prepared for the Town of Clinton by:

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

COPLAY BOROUGH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

GREEN STREETS & INFRASTRUCTURE: A COUNTY APPROACH. Mimicking Nature to Manage Stormwater in Developed Areas

City of Redmond. Urban Holding Area Master Planning Requirements and Approval Process

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES. In This Chapter. Goals & Strategies 182 Project List 183 Future Land Use 186 CHAPTER 11 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

Recommendations for Municipalities

Creating Active, Healthy Communities in Collaboration with Local Government Planning Agencies:

Land Use element LAND USE POLICY AREAS ESTATE AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL AREAS/RURAL SHELDON AREA OLD TOWN ELK GROVE

Arlington, Virginia is a worldclass

Workshop #1 Outcomes. The Planning Partnership

INTRODUCTION. b. The extent to which such problems and objectives have been reduced or have increased subsequent to such date.

SOUTH NATOMAS COMMUNITY PLAN

Complete Streets in Lancaster County

HAMLET OF KINGMAN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN

CHAPTER 4 FUTURE LAND USE AND URBAN SERVICES DISTRICTS

Design for Health Comprehensive Plan Review Checklists. Design for Health,

Land Use & Transportation Primer

COMMISSION ACTION FORM

CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS & SITE DESIGN

Background Summary Report

13. PRELIMINARY PLAT NO MILLS FARM - Vicinity of the southeast corner of 159 th Street and Quivira Road

MUNICIPAL IMPLEMENTATION TOOL #4: Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission

9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

Making Transit Oriented Development Work For Boonton, NJ

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

13. VANDORF-PRESTON LAKE SECONDARY PLAN 13.1 INTRODUCTION

Westbound: A One-day Exploration of Growth

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY 1. PROJECT SUMMARY DATA

City of Chickasaw Land Use Comprehensive Plan 2030 Chapter5-Draft(2)Public review_

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

SUBJECT: LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED AND ADOPTED AMENDMENT CONSENT AGENDA

7,600 Residential Units 1,700,000 SF Non-Res 300-Room ALF 300-Room Hotel University School, Park, Civic parcels 1,889 ac flow-way/preservation

4. UTILITIES ELEMENT.

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

Request for Statement of Interest in Implementation of the Roosevelt Road Redevelopment Plan

Environmental Protection Ordinances (Performance Zoning) Bedminster Township, Bucks County

Purpose of the Master Plan

STEVEN T. MATTAS. Representative Experience

Land Use Element. policy areas are discussed in this Element:

Natomas Vision Plan and PLNP

Appendix 1 Structure plan guidelines

GATEWAY AREA STRUCTURE PLAN

7 PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT

Rural Conservation. Rural Conservation. Moving Forward ~ Planning Ahead. Introduction

Clarksburg Master Plan Concept and the Clarksburg Town Center. Planning Regulating Building

Green Infrastructure Policies and Ordinances

Green Infrastructure. NYS Department of Environmental Conservation

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018

General Reexamination of the Master Plan

implementation10 Village of Greendale Comprehensive Plan: Greendale, Wisconsin. Revisiting a Greenbelt Community

Implementation Vision

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building. Land Use Review- Former Parkway Belt West Lands- Fieldgate Drive and Audubon Boulevard

GUIDEBOOK ON LOCAL PLANNING FOR HEALTHY COMMUNITIES (2014)

SECTION II SECTION II STATEMENT OF GOALS, OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES, ASSUMPTIONS, POLICIES AND STANDARDS

AREASTRUCTURE PLAN AMENDMENT COCHRANE NORTH

ORDINANCE NO. City of Bellingham City Attorney 210 Lottie Street Bellingham, Washington INFILL HOUSING ORDINANCE Page 1

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2016 November 03. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

Somers Point Master Plan

An Integrated Green Infrastructure Plan to Address Combined Sewer Overflow, Stormwater and Nutrient Reductions in Lancaster City, PA

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE ISSUES MEETING. January 21, 2010 City Hall Mitchell Room 6:00 pm 9:00 pm

A citizen s guide to the. Comprehensive Plan. City of Lakeville, Minnesota 1

Presentation Item C Annotated Model Outline for a Framework for a Green Infrastructure Plan

The Neighbourhood Unit

NASSAU COUNTY TOWN HALL NEW YORK & CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES. A Unique Bi-State Partnership to Improve Jobs, Housing and Transportation

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis March 19, 2018

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

2.0 Hi s t o r y & Existing Co n d i t i o n s

Executive Summary Purpose of the Plan Defining Open Space and Greenways

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

Chapter 8: Land Use. Key Issues. Introduction. Stakeholders. Survey Results. Purpose

Three Decades of Smart Growth: Arlington s Urban Village

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 February 09. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ITEM # _ 41 _ DATE: COUNCIL ACTION FORM MAJOR FINAL PLAT FOR MENARDS SUBDIVISION BACKGROUND:

PRELIMINARY REPORT. HIGHWAY 18 CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN VILLAGE OF DOUSMAN November, 2014

12.A: Prepare and update a full parks and recreation master plan regularly.

APPENDIX II: PROJECT GLOSSARY

Plan Overview. Manhattan Area 2035 Reflections and Progress. Chapter 1: Introduction. Background

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

Comprehensive Plan ADOPTED APRIL 2014

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 16, 2016

Public may provide comments on the GDP within the next two weeks (December 24)

Transcription:

Transfer of Development Rights Chesterfield Township: A Case Study New Jersey Highlands Council March 5, 2009

Chesterfield Township s Old York Village Transfer of Development Rights and Traditional Neighborhood Design

Background 1989, 2004 Enabling legislation Windfall & Wipeout of traditional zoning TDR balancing the scales of equity County s role in TDR State s role in TDR????

What is TDR? Clustering of development on a township-wide, not parcel specific, basis Transfer of development potential from one parcel to another Effects: Preservation of land from which development potential is transferred Increased development density on land to which development potential is transferred

Elements of a TDR Program Resource Protection ( Sending Area ) Identify the resource to be protected Allocation of Development Potential Existing zoning and environmental constraints Transfer Mechanism Deed Restrictions, enrollment procedure, appeals

Elements of a TDR Program (cont d) Planning for Development ( Receiving Area ) Size of the Receiving Area: gross vs. net densities, environmental constraints, open space Infrastructure plan & financing Site planning & Architectural design standards

Voluntary vs. Mandatory Mandatory TDR Sending Area significantly downzoned: TDR is the only equity opportunity for landowners Voluntary TDR Sending Area NOT downzoned; landowners retain underlying zoning/development opportunities TDR is an option, not a requirement, to access land equity

A Chesterfield Township Profile 924 dwellings 2,614 residents 21.61 square miles 121 residents/sq. mi. Flemington Trenton Philadelphia Burlington County New York City 2000 Census

New Jersey 2004 State Plan Designations

Centers Crosswicks Planned Village Chesterfield Sykesville

Chesterfield TDR Program Township planning initiative Preservation goal: farmland preservation Development goal: Neotraditional village TDR ordinance adopted 1998 Voluntary TDR program Pre-existing zoning: 3.3 acre lot average Leading PDR municipality: 4,670 acres

Sending Area Statistics 7,525 acres; 1,408 associated TDR credits Land must be farmland assessed; > 10 acres Can build up to 1 unit per 50 acres after enrollment in TDR program (lot size of 1 acre or more) Credit allocation formula: (1:2.7 + 1:6 + 1:50) + 10%

Preserved Lands PDR Preserved: 4,670 acres TDR Preserved: 2,142 acres TDR Contracts: ~ 600 acres TOTAL to date: 7,412 acres 755.75 credits enrolled or under contract (53.7% of allocated credits)

Receiving Area Context Crosswicks Village 1990 s Large-Lot Development Existing Single-Lot Patterns

Receiving Area Crosswicks Creek Tributary

Receiving Area Statistics 570 acres; 122 associated TDR credits Gross density = 2.2 TDRs/acre Total build out: ~1250 units Design for neo-traditional village Sewer provided through NJDOC facility

Village Plan for Receiving Area Single-Family Three-Family Mixed-Use Civic / Institutional Recreation Open Space

Street Hierarchy Boulevard Parkway Neighborhood Alley Parking

Street Hierarchy Boulevard

Recreation and Open Space Active Recreation Open Space Bike Path Foot Trail

Stormwater Management Design Principles

Site Planning Standards

Historic Homes of Chesterfield Georgian Federal Victorian Greek Revival Italianate Second Empire

Architectural Standards

Architectural Standards

Streetscape Design and Furnishings

Implementing TDR 1997 - Master Plan Identifies Sending and Receiving Areas 1998 - Land Development Ordinance Creates TDR Zoning 1999 - Wastewater Management Plan Approved by NJDEP Planned Village 2000 - NJ State Planning Commission Designates Receiving Area as a Center 2002 - Master Plan Amendment Creates Village Plan & Architectural Standards 2003 - Construction Commences on First Subdivision 2004 - First CO s Issued 2006-115 CO s Issued 212 Building Permits Issued Subdivision Approvals for 813 Units Subdivision Pending for 357 Units 2,060 acres enrolled and preserved

Implementation Status Developers control 100% of the receiving area 66.5 % of the Township s ultimate development capacity (1,170 units) is either approved, under construction or completed Construction commenced by four developers on 580 units (526 COs issued) School location has been designated as the hub of the community Recreation Improvement District created to fund $3.9 million in common facilities Transportation Improvement District created to fund $8.9 million in collector roads

The Bottom Line TDR is a growth management tool, not a shield to prevent growth Planning Board/Developer dynamic changed TDR creates a center design opportunity: Old York Village embodies principles of Traditional Neighborhood Design as found in local examples, such as historic Crosswicks Village TDR can successfully preserve farmland and open space by substituting private capital and the operation of the real estate market for public funding

Awards American Planning Association 2004 Outstanding Planning Program New Jersey Planning Officials 2004 Achievement in Planning Award New Jersey Future 2003 Smart Growth Award American Society of Landscape Architects NJ Chapter 2003 Landscape Planning and Analysis Merit Award American Planning Association NJ Chapter 2002 Outstanding Planning Implementation Award